Dec 2017, Consultation Statement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dec 2017, Consultation Statement Consultation Statement December 2017 1 1.0 Introduction and Background ....................................................................... 4 2.0 Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan and Informal Public Consultation ............................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Informal Consultation .............................................................................. 5 2.2 Community Conversations - Face-to-Face Interviews ............................ 5 2.3 Consultation Questionnaire December 2016 / January 2017 ................. 7 2.4 Community Dialogue – May / June 2017 .............................................. 12 3.0 Formal Consultation on the Glapthorn Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan – 21 August 2017 to 13 October 2017 ................................... 16 4.0 Consultation Responses to the Draft Neighbourhood Plan for the Regulation 14 Consultation 21 August 2017 to 13 October 2017. ...................... 17 Table 1 – Glapthorn Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan Formal Consultation Responses from consultation bodies ........................................ 17 Table 2 Glapthorn Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan Consultation Responses to SEA/ ........................................................................................ 86 5.0 Post Regulation 14 Consultation ................................................................ 89 2 Map 1 Glapthorn Neighbourhood Area 3 1.0 Introduction and Background 1.1 This Consultation Statement has been prepared in accordance with The Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (SI No. 637) Part 5 Paragraph 15 (2)1 which defines a “consultation statement” as a document which: (a) contains details of the persons and bodies who were consulted about the proposed neighbourhood development plan; (b) explains how they were consulted; (c) summarises the main issues and concerns raised by the persons consulted; and (d) describes how these issues and concerns have been considered and, where relevant, addressed in the proposed neighbourhood development plan. 1.2 In April 2016, the Parish Council applied to East Northamptonshire Council for designation as a neighbourhood area. On the 24th June 2016 East Northamptonshire Council (ENC) designated the Civil Parish of Glapthorn as a Neighbourhood Area, under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 – Part 2(5) . 1.3 The Glapthorn Neighbourhood Planning Group was formed, and structured as a Parish Council Advisory Committee, and embarked on the development of a Neighbourhood Plan. Thirteen members of the public, including three Parish Councillors, formed the initial group. 1.4 This Consultation Statement lists the various stages in the consultation process and includes references to all the events and information that it comprised. It also contains feedback from the public in the form of analysis of the questionnaire, and analysis of comments received at the Regulation 14 stage. 1.5 Throughout the preparation of the Glapthorn Neighbourhood Plan all relevant documents were available on the parish website. http://glapthorn.org.uk/index.php/neighbourhood-plan/ 1 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/637/contents/made 4 2.0 Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan and Informal Public Consultation 2.1 Informal Consultation 2.1.1 The Draft of the GNP was prepared by building on the results of the extensive informal consultation and engagement activities undertaken. There have been three major elements to the consultation process prior to Regulation 14 Consultations: Community Conversations August / September involving face to face 2016 interviews Community Consultation December 2016 / Paper and accompanying January 2017 Consultation Questionnaire Plus, associated Call for January 2017 to March Sites from landowners 2017 Community Dialogue and February 2017 to Public Forums on results of June 2017 Questionnaire and Call for Sites culminating in two Exhibition Days and testing Exhibition Days in of Community views on May and June 2017 • vision and objectives for the Plan • draft policies for the Plan • site assessments, and • a village settlement boundary 2.2 Community Conversations - Face-to-Face Interviews 2.2.1 An initial round of face to face interviews (Appendix 1) were carried out in August/September 2016. Glapthorn contains 111 households and 82 responses were received, giving a percentage return of 74%. A full report on these conversations is available as section 1 of the Reports on Consultations on the Parish Council web-site glapthorn.org.uk 5 Are you happy about living in Glapthorn? What do you like? What could improve Like Concerns Improve Idyllic Village. Encroachment of Oundle Pavements and pathways Sense of community Fear of uncontrolled Lighting Good people development On street parking Good social life Loss of unique identity Internet Great school Fear for life and quality of life Lovely Church from ever increasing volume Safe and speed of traffic Surrounded by open Fear that we are powerless to countryside control development. Proximity to Oundle Housing 2.2.2 The interviewer was invited to ask questions in relation to housing and housing needs as follows: “Needs. What are they? Who has a need? What do you think about how we provide for the young/old/single people in the village? What are your views about design/conservation? What are your views about character and building materials?” “How can the village best contribute to the National and Regional Housing plans that request more building? With this in mind what are your views on Backfilling, Cul de sacs, and Infilling?” “What is your view about potentially altering the Village envelope to accommodate appropriate development?” Housing Responses Whilst there is a fear of over development and the loss of Glapthorn’s unique identity, there is also an acceptance that small scale development, if appropriate and complimentary, is permissible. Only 9% of respondents stated that they did not wish to see any development of housing or expansion of the village envelope. There was support for infill development and expansion of the village envelope with less enthusiasm for cul de sacs and overall opposition to backfill. A significant number of the responses were qualified by comments such as “no big estates”; “small scale”; “sensible”; “sustainable”; “maintain unique identity “ Education 2.2.3 The two Primary Schools which serve Glapthorn (Glapthorn Church of England Primary and Oundle Primary) are held in high regard. However, concern was expressed about the needs of Glapthorn C of E Primary School for a playing field, traffic calming outside the school and a drop off area for parents delivering and picking up children. Traffic and Transport 2.2.4 The community were asked about their views and needs and the absence of public transport. The volume and speed of traffic was identified as a universal concern with suggestions made about a 20mph limit, average speed cameras and traffic calming 6 for the village. Public transport was not raised for many as an issue (reflecting high car ownership). The Connect service was identified as very good and deserving of better usage and support. Facilities and Infrastructure 2.2.5 The community were asked for their views on public transport, internet, children’s play areas, young adult facilities, paths and walkways. The comments were: Internet Poor (a much-improved service is now available) Lighting Poor Shop/Pub. Nice to have. Not sustainable Pavements and Pathways need maintaining/Improving. In village, through fields and to/from Oundle/Southwick 48% in favour of Children’s play area (15% against) and 12% in favour of young adult area (10% against). Businesses 2.2.6 The community were asked for their views on whether they run a business from home? What can be done to help, and what hinders? The comments were: Better Internet needed Better road signs (Horses. Tractors) and 20mph speed limit Consideration of brownfield sites and buildings to attract & develop new businesses Issues beyond the village but within the Parish boundary 2.2.7 Specific questions were asked of the community in relation to housing development on the Oundle boundary, potential development aspirations beyond Glapthorn village, and “how do you view Glapthorn and Oundle”. The responses were: 98% in favour of maintaining separation from Oundle. This is a recurring and dominant theme No appetite for supporting development of land adjacent to Oundle Primary School or the playing field Fear that the Old Farm Lane development could be repeated causing serious encroachment between Oundle and Glapthorn. 2.3 Consultation Questionnaire December 2016 / January 2017 2.3.1 The first round of local conversations was extremely informative in guiding the creation of the Neighbourhood Plan with the high level of participation giving a good cross section of views and opinions. In order to firm up the emerging ideas and test whether they have community support when expressed as draft policies for the Neighbourhood Plan, a Consultation Document with an associated Questionnaire was distributed to every household in December 2016. (Appendix 2) 7 The questionnaire comprising three sections: Section A: Core Policies – This represented proposed core policies to determine the main content of the GNP. Respondents were requested to indicate whether they agreed or disagreed with these. Section B: Where should development, if any occur? Respondents were requested to put forward sites for future development, and identify
Recommended publications
  • Glapthorn Neighbourhood Plan – Appendices
    Glapthorn Neighbourhood Plan – Appendices 1. Community Consultations Prior to Preparation of Page 2 Draft Plan for Regulation 14 Consultations 2. Statements of Principle Pages 3 to 7 The Steering Group produced STATEMENTS OF PRINCIPLE which guided the drafting of the Vision and Objectives and provided the basis of the planning policies and site assessments in the Neighbourhood Plan. These Statements of Principle are expressions of the Glapthorn Community’s wishes for what, why and where development should and should not take place in the Parish over the Plan period. They are the products of the extensive consultations over the last 12 months. 3. Extracts from North Northamptonshire Joint Core Pages 8 and 9 Strategy most relevant to the Glapthorn Neighbourhood Plan 4. Site Identification – all sites submitted in Plan process Pages 10 and 11 and sites granted planning permission 2011 to 2017 5. Site Assessments Pages 12 to 25 Annex Pages 26 and 27 1 APPENDIX 1 COMMUNITY CONSULTATIONS PRIOR TO PREPARATION OF DRAFT PLAN FOR REGULATION 14 CONSULTATIONS 1. The Draft of the GNP was prepared by building on the results of the extensive informal consultation and engagement activities undertaken. There have been three major elements to the consultation process prior to Regulation 14 Consultations: Community Conversations August / Undertaken on a household basis. involving face to face September interviews 2016 85 responses from 114 households 75% participation. Community Consultation December Questionnaire distributed to Paper and accompanying 2016 / January every household. Consultation Questionnaire 2017 Plus, associated Call for 77 household responses Sites from landowners January 2017 (representing 149 individuals) to March 2017 70% participation Community Dialogue and February Public Forums on results 2017 to June of Questionnaire and Call 2017 for Sites culminating in two Exhibition Days and Exhibition 120 attendees at Exhibition Days testing of Community Days in May views on and June 60% participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3 Baseline Information
    Appendix 3 Baseline Information This report sets out the findings to date of the baseline data collection exercise undertaken for the SA process. In particular it was used to gain a fuller understanding of the issues in the Plan Area and to inform the appraisal. However, it is appreciated that there are some omissions in the information base, which in any case will be subject to change over time. These omissions will be addressed as soon as possible and changes will be monitored. A list of the ‘implications for the plan’ is inserted at the end of each section, to show the ways in which the Plan could impact on the matters identified. Demography Population Distribution and Structure Table 1 provides details of the size and distribution of the population, the gender and age structure. It can be seen that small concentrations of population exist in the two towns of Oundle and Thrapston, but with the majority spread across the rural area, mainly resident within the well developed pattern of villages and hamlets. While there are some significant variations in the age structure across the Plan Area it is apparent that as a whole it is comparable with the situation in England and Wales and the Region, with slightly more in the 16-64 age range and a little less in the 65+ range. In many ways the age structure of the population is similar to that for the District of East Northamptonshire as a whole. The age structure for the District is illustrated by Figure 1. The Office of National Statistics has made some population growth predictions for the Plan area (2003 based sub-national predictions).
    [Show full text]
  • North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031
    NORTH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE JOINT CORE STRATEGY 2011-2031 JULY 2016 – MAIN MODIFICATIONS TO THE SUBMITTED PLAN AS RECOMMENDED BY THE INSPECTOR NORTH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE JOINT CORE STRATEGY 2011–2031 CONTENTS OF THE JOINT CORE STRATEGY This version of the Joint Core Strategy (JCS) identifies proposed “Main Modifications” (MM’s) to the Plan that have been recommended by the Inspector following the Examination process. These are annotated throughout, with new text in italics and deleted text shown struck through. Modifications that relate to the same issue are given the same MM reference number. The rationale for each MM is set out in the Inspectors schedule of Main Modifications (Appendix 1) which is available on the JPU website at www.nnjpu.org.uk. Please note the wording of the JCS is as recommended in the Inspector’s schedule of main modifications. There may be some presentational differences in how the main modifications are shown within the JCS to assist the user. A clean version of the JCS is currently being prepared to incorporate formatting changes (formatting, layout, paragraph numbering, deletion of references to “draft” and “ consultation” etc. )and factual updates (including those on the JPU’s schedule of minor updates). This document will be published on the JPU web site as soon as possible. Hard copies of the adopted JCS will not be printed until the end of the legal challenge period (25th August). 1. INTRODUCTION 4 SECTION B – SPATIAL POLICIES 72 2. VISION & OUTCOMES 12 1. THE NETWORK OF URBAN & RURAL AREAS 74 Policy 11 The Network of Urban & Rural Areas 80 KEY DIAGRAM 34 Policy 12 Town Centres and Town Centre Uses 87 Policy 13 Rural Exceptions 90 Policy 14 Deenethorpe Airfield Area of Opportunity 93 SECTION A – CORE POLICIES 36 Policy 1 Presumption in favour of Sustainable Development 38 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Tree Health and Tree Populations in England Since C.1550
    The History of Tree Health and Tree Populations in England since c.1550. Tom Williamson Gerry Barnes Toby Pillatt Acknowledgements A large number of people have helped with this project, providing access to documents or providing information and advice. We would like to thank, in particular, the staff at Hertfordshire Archives and Local History, the Northamptonshire Record Office, Norfolk Record Office, and the various Yorkshire Record Offices (at Northallerton, Leeds, Bradford, Calderdale, Kirklees, Sheffield, Doncaster, Barnsley, Hull and Beverley); and Crispin Towell at Boughton House archives, Northamptonshire. Thanks also to Anne Rowe and Peter Austin, for information about Hertfordshire; Tracey Partida, for access to her research on Northamptonshire enclosure; and to Sid Cooper, Teresa Betterton, Rachel Riley, Richard Brooke, Jim Lyon, Andrew Falcon, Rod Pass, John White, Mark Pritchard, Rory Hart, Peter Clarke, Garry Battell, Nicola Orchard, Justin Gilbert, Andrew MacNair, Jack Langton, Rob Liddiard, Steve Scott and Patsy Dallas. Contents Part 1: Report Summary ……………………………………………………………………………… ........................ 4 Part 2: Main Report: ................................................................................................................ 18 1. Introduction: trees, woods and landscapes ….. .................................................................... 18 2. Farmland Trees ..................................................................................................................... 51 3. Woodland and Wood-Pasture
    [Show full text]
  • Glapthorn Neighbourhood Development Plan
    Glapthorn Parish Council Glapthorn Neighbourhood Development Plan A report to East Northamptonshire Council of the Independent Examination of the Glapthorn Neighbourhood Development Plan Independent Examiner Christopher Edward Collison Christopher Edward Collison BA (Hons) MBA MRTPI MIED MCMI IHBC Planning and Management Ltd [email protected] 23 April 2018 Glapthorn Neighbourhood Development Plan Christopher Edward Collison 1 Report of Independent Examination April 2018 Planning and Management Ltd Contents Page Overall Finding 3 Neighbourhood Planning 4 Independent Examination 5 Basic Conditions and other statutory requirements 7 Documents 9 Consultation 10 The Neighbourhood Plan taken as a whole 14 The Neighbourhood Plan policies 24 Policy 1: Site allocations Policy 2: Settlement boundary Policy 3: Housing development within the settlement boundary of Glapthorn Policy 4: Supporting rural diversification Policy 5: Protecting landscape character Policy 6: Green infrastructure Policy 7: Built environment Policy 8: Avoiding coalescence Policy 9: Local green space Policy 10: Design principles Policy 11: Mitigating traffic and road safety issues Policy 12: Protecting existing and supporting new community and recreational services and facilities Summary and Referendum 63 Annex: Minor corrections to the Neighbourhood Plan 64 Glapthorn Neighbourhood Development Plan Christopher Edward Collison 2 Report of Independent Examination April 2018 Planning and Management Ltd Overall Finding This is the report of the Independent Examination of the Glapthorn Neighbourhood Development Plan. The plan area is the entire civil Parish of Glapthorn within the East Northamptonshire Council area. The plan period is 2016-2031. The Neighbourhood Plan includes policies relating to the development and use of land. The Neighbourhood Plan allocates 8 sites for development which with completions and permissions will result in 32 new dwellings, excluding any windfall developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Assessment and Evidence Base Review
    October 2016 2 Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 5 2.0 National Planning Policy 6 2.1 National Planning Policy Framework 6 2.2 National Planning Practice Guidance 12 2.3 Ministerial Statements 13 3.0 East Northamptonshire Planning Policy 15 3.1 North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy, 2016 15 3.2 East Northamptonshire Local Plan (1996) 36 3.3 Rural North, Oundle and Thrapston Plan, 2011 39 3.4 Emerging East Northamptonshire Replacement District Wide Local Plan 47 4.0 Evidence Base 48 4.1 Housing 48 4.2 Flood Risk 53 4.3 Landscape and Environment 58 4.4 Infrastructure 81 5.0 Supplementary Planning Documents 85 6.0 Built Heritage in Glapthorn 93 7.0 Conclusion 94 October 2016 3 Document Overview The Parish of Glapthorn is in East Northamptonshire, and lies about 2 miles north west of Oundle and 8.5 miles east of Corby. Glapthorn Brook, a tributary of the River Nene, divides the parish, separating it into Upper and Lower Glapthorn. The neighbourhood development plan area covers 598 hectares and the population of the Parish was recorded as 271 in the 2011 Census (Neighbourhood Statistics). The key policy documents which are relevant to the area are: o National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) o The adopted North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy, 2016 o The adopted East Northamptonshire Local Plan, 1996 o The adopted Rural North, Oundle and Thrapston Plan, 2011 o The emerging East Northamptonshire Replacement District Wide Local Plan The adopted Rural North, Oundle and Thrapston Plan identifies Glapthorn as a Category A Network Village, which is subject to Policy 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Corby Housing Site Schedule East Northamptonshire Housing Site Schedule Kettering Housing Site Schedule Wellingborough Housing Site Schedule
    NORTH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE AUTHORITIES’ MONITORING REPORT 1st April 2016 - 31st March 2017 May 2018 1 Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction 2. Local Development Scheme 3. Overall Spatial Strategy 4. Economy and Town Centres 5. Housing 6. Assessment of Housing Land Supply, 2018-23 7. Environment 8. Infrastructure Appendices A. Local Authority Housing Trajectories assessing past and projected performance relative to the Joint Core Strategy, 2011-31 B. Calculation of the five year housing land requirement relative to the JCS, 2018-23 C. Local Authority Housing Site Schedules D. Average House Prices – 1st April 2016 – 31st March 2017 List of Tables 1. Distribution of Housing Development, 2011-31, by settlement category 2. Housing Completions by Local Authority, 2015/17-2016/17 3. The number and % of new developments built on Brownfield land by LPA 16/17 4. Number of sites which have been deallocated/had planning permission not renewed due to developer inertia 16/17 5. % of completed residual development within 0.4km of a bus stop 6. % of completed residual development within 1km of a health centre 7. % of completed residual development within 2km of a sports centre 8. % of completed residual development within 0.6km of a primary school 9. % of completed residual development within 1.5km of a secondary school 10. Total amount of additional employment floorspace by type 11. Total amount of employment floorspace on previously developed land – by type 12. Employment Land Available by Type 13. B-class employment areas lost to other (non-B) uses 16/17 14. The number and scale of retail developments approved outside of the defined town centre areas 15.
    [Show full text]
  • North Northamptonshire Partners North Northamptonshire Market Towns and Rural Regeneration
    North Northamptonshire Partners North Northamptonshire Market Towns and Rural Regeneration Final Report May 2004 Entec UK Limited "Produced with funding from the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and the East Midlands Development Agency" Report for North Northamptonshire North Northamptonshire Partners c/oKaren Horner Partners Planning Policy Manager Strategy and Policy Directorate East Northamptonshire Council North Northamptonshire Cedar Drive Thrapston Market Towns and Rural Northants Regeneration NN14 4LZ Final Report Main Contributors Nigel Stuart-Baker Alan Chaplin May 2004 Neil Hall Gareth Smith Entec UK Limited Emma Moore Issued by ………………………………………………………… Neil Hall Approved by ………………………………………………………… Alan Chaplin Entec UK Limited Gables House Kenilworth Road Leamington Spa Warwickshire CV32 6JX England Tel: +44 (0) 1926 439000 Fax: +44 (0) 1926 439010 h:\projects\ea-210\12947 market towns appraisal\reports\final report v.2.doc Certificate No. EMS 69090 Certificate No. FS 13881 In accordance with an environmentally responsible approach, this document is printed on recycled paper produced from 100% post-consumer waste, or on ECF (elemental chlorine free) paper i Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Study Aims 1 1.2.1 Key Issues and Considerations 1 1.3 Report Structure 3 2. Recent Research and Study Approach 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Recent Research and Studies 5 2.2.1 Planning For Sustainable Rural Economic Development (Land Use Consultants for Countryside Agency - March 2003) 5 2.2.2 The Role of Rural Settlements as Service Centres (Land Use Consultants for Countryside Agency - January 2004) 6 2.2.3 Are Villages Sustainable? A Review of Literature (UWE for Countryside Agency - June 2001) 7 2.3 Study Methodology 7 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Glapthorn Community Flood Risk and Mitigation Investigation Community Drainage Maintenance Plan
    D S A ◆ DAVID SMITH ASSOCIATES ◆ Consulting Structural & Civil Engineers ◆ ◆ London ◆ Northampton ◆ Cirencester ◆ Birmingham ◆ www.dsagroup.co.uk GLAPTHORN COMMUNITY FLOOD RISK AND MITIGATION INVESTIGATION & COMMUNITY DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PLAN Project: Northamptonshire Pathfinder 2 Client: Northamptonshire Emergency Planning Team Northamptonshire County Council One Angel Square Angel Street Northampton NN1 1ED Prepared by: Richard Jones Date: July 2018 Reference: 17/28550/GLA Revision: 02 VAT Registration No.: 670 8636 12 Eur Ing David Smith BSc(Hons), CEng, MICE, MIStructE, CMaPS, MFPWS, FCABE, ACIArb, Alison Smith Hitesh Jethwa BScEng(Hons), I.Eng, AMIStructE Steven Ainge BEng(Hons), IEng, AMIStructE Richard Jones HNC, TMICE, Eng.Tech, Thomas Garrod B.Eng.(Hons),, John Mills MA(Cantab), CEng, MICE, MIStructE. London Northampton Cirencester Birmingham 16 Upper Woburn Place 8 Duncan Close Waterloo House The Old Foundry Room No 5 London Moulton Park The Waterloo Bath Street WC1H 0AF Northampton NN3 6WL Cirencester GL7 2PY Walsall WS1 3BZ 0203 7418098 01604 782620 01285 657328 01922 895 305 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] REVISION SCHEDULE Glapthorn Community Flood Risk and Mitigation Investigation Community Drainage Maintenance Plan David Smith Associates Reference : 17/28550/GLA Rev Date Details Author Checked Approved 01 17/05/18 Draft report for stakeholder Richard Jones Ruth Burnham Josie Bateman consultation. (David Smith (Senior Flood & (Senior Project Associates) Water Officer) Manager F&WM) 02 27/07/18 Revision following additional Richard Jones Ruth Burnham Phil Jones (Flood information/consultation (David Smith (Senior Flood & and Water Associates) Water Officer) Manager) CONTENTS REVISION SCHEDULE ........................................................................................................ 1 CONTENTS .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Glapthorn Neighbourhood Plan 2016 – 2031
    GLAPTHORN NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2016 – 2031 Approved by Referendum on 5th July 2018 and “Made” by resolution of East Northamptonshire Council on 30th July 2018 Prepared by the Glapthorn Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group on behalf of the Glapthorn Parish Council with assistance from Kirkwells Planning Consultants This document with additional background material is available on the Glapthorn Parish Council web-site. glapthorn.org.uk Table of Contents Page No. Executive Summary 5 1.0 Introduction and Background 6 2.0 A Portrait of Glapthorn Parish 10 3.0 Planning Policy Context 16 4.0 Vision and Objectives 19 5.0 Glapthorn NP Planning Policies 21 6.0 Housing 23 6.1 Call for Sites 6.2 Site Assessments 6.3 Village Sites 6.4 Housing Numbers in Glapthorn Village 6.5 Settlement Boundary 6.6 Development within the Settlement Boundary 6.7 Sites in the Wider Parish 6.8 Site Assessments on Oundle / Glapthorn Boundary 7.0 Employment 32 8.0 Landscape Character 34 9.0 Design 39 10.0 Community and Leisure Facilities 44 11.0 Monitoring the Plan 46 Glapthorn NP Policies Page No. Policy 1 Site Allocations 26 Policy 2 Settlement Boundary 27 Policy 3 Housing development in Settlement Boundary 29 Policy 4 Supporting Rural Diversification 33 Policy 5 Protecting Landscape Character 35 Policy 6 Green Infrastructure 36 Policy 7 Built Environment 36 Policy 8 Avoiding Coalescence 36 Policy 9 Local Green Space 38 Policy 10 Design Principles 40 Policy 11 Mitigating Traffic and Road Safety Issues 42 Policy 12 Protecting Existing and Supporting New 45 Community and Recreational Facilities Glapthorn Neighbourhood Plan “Made” July 2018 Map 1 Glapthorn Neighbourhood Plan Area and Parish Boundary @Crown copyright and database rights [2015] Ordnance Survey 100055940 Glapthorn Parish Council (Licensee) License No 0100055475 Page 4 Glapthorn Neighbourhood Plan “Made” July 2018 Executive Summary This is the Glapthorn Neighbourhood Plan (GNP) for the Glapthorn Parish Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Settlement Hierarchy for the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy
    Developing a settlement hierarchy for the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy Background Paper FINAL REPORT July 2012 Developing a settlement hierarchy for the North Northamptonshire Core July 2012 Strategy Review CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Stage 1 – Existing settlement hierarchy 7 3.0 Stage 2 – Existing evidence base documents 10 4.0 Stage 3 – Defining the scope of the settlement hierarchy to be 18 included within the Core Strategy review 5.0 Stage 4 – Possible alternative approaches – retention of existing 23 settlement hierarchy (approach 1) or comprehensive review of current hierarchy (approach 2)? 6.0 Stage 5 – Possible alternative approaches – simplified 33 settlement hierarchy (approaches 3 or 4) 7.0 Stage 6 – Conclusions and recommendations: preferred 41 approach APPENDIX 1 – Existing settlement hierarchy (adopted DPDs) 45 APPENDIX 2 – Approach 1: Retention of the current Core 49 Strategy approach, but expansion to define a more comprehensive settlement hierarchy APPENDIX 3 – Approach 2: Full revision to the current Core 54 Strategy settlement hierarchy, but expansion to define more comprehensive settlement hierarchy APPENDIX 4 – Approach 3: Simplified settlement hierarchy – 59 four categories of settlement APPENDIX 5 – Initial list of larger villages assessed as potential 63 “Principal”/ service villages 2 Developing a settlement hierarchy for the North Northamptonshire Core July 2012 Strategy Review 1.0 Introduction 1.1 The North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (CSS)/ “Core Strategy”, was adopted in June 2008. The Examination Inspector, while finding the Core Strategy overall to be a “sound” Development Plan Document (DPD), identified certain criticisms (Report to the North Northamptonshire Joint Planning Unit, 12 May 20081), e.g.: “…concerned about the amount of development proposed for the smaller towns and settlements of North Northamptonshire when compared for the total at Kettering” (paragraph 25); and “…failure to provide a firm long term infrastructure foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Glapthorn Neighbourhood Plan – Appendices
    Glapthorn Neighbourhood Plan – Appendices 1. Community Consultations Prior to Preparation of Page 2 Draft Plan for Regulation 14 Consultations 2. Statements of Principle Pages 3 to 7 The Steering Group produced STATEMENTS OF PRINCIPLE which guided the drafting of the Vision and Objectives and provided the basis of the planning policies and site assessments in the Neighbourhood Plan. These Statements of Principle are expressions of the Glapthorn Community’s wishes for what, why and where development should and should not take place in the Parish over the Plan period. They are the products of the extensive consultations over the last 12 months. 3. Extracts from North Northamptonshire Joint Core Pages 8 and 9 Strategy most relevant to the Glapthorn Neighbourhood Plan 4. Site Identification – all sites submitted in Plan process Pages 10 and 11 and sites granted planning permission 2011 to 2017 5. Site Assessments Pages 12 to 25 Annex Pages 26 and 27 1 APPENDIX 1 COMMUNITY CONSULTATIONS PRIOR TO PREPARATION OF DRAFT PLAN FOR REGULATION 14 CONSULTATIONS 1. The Draft of the GNP was prepared by building on the results of the extensive informal consultation and engagement activities undertaken. There have been three major elements to the consultation process prior to Regulation 14 Consultations: Community Conversations August / Undertaken on a household basis. involving face to face September interviews 2016 85 responses from 114 households 75% participation. Community Consultation December Questionnaire distributed to Paper and accompanying 2016 / January every household. Consultation Questionnaire 2017 Plus, associated Call for 77 household responses Sites from landowners January 2017 (representing 149 individuals) to March 2017 70% participation Community Dialogue and February Public Forums on results 2017 to June of Questionnaire and Call 2017 for Sites culminating in two Exhibition Days and Exhibition 120 attendees at Exhibition Days testing of Community Days in May views on and June 60% participation.
    [Show full text]