A Review Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Review Journal of Anxiety Disorders Journal of Anxiety Disorders 23 (2009) 305–313 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Anxiety Disorders Review The relation between public speaking anxiety and social anxiety: A review Anke W. Blo¨te *, Marcia J.W. Kint, Anne C. Miers, P. Michiel Westenberg Leiden University Institute for Psychological Research, Developmental Psychology Unit, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: This article reviewed the literature on public speaking anxiety in the context of social phobia subtyping. Received 2 April 2008 In total, 18 empirical studies on subtype issues related to public speaking anxiety were analyzed. Results Received in revised form 12 November 2008 of the reviewed studies are discussed in relation to their research method, that is, whether it focused on Accepted 18 November 2008 qualitative or quantitative aspects of subtype differences and whether it used a clinical or community sample. Evidence supported the premise that public speaking anxiety is a distinct subtype, qualitatively Keywords: and quantitatively different from other subtypes of social phobia. The significance of this finding for Public speaking anxiety social phobia studies using speech tasks to assess participants’ state anxiety and behavioral performance Social Phobia is discussed. Subtypes ß 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Contents 1. Introduction . 305 1.1. Short history of subtyping . 306 1.2. Subtype and severity continuum models . 306 2. The present study . 307 2.1. Looking for qualitative differences . 307 2.1.1. Clinical studies. 307 2.1.2. Community studies . 307 2.2. Focusing on quantitative differences. 309 2.2.1. Clinical studies. 309 2.2.2. Community studies . 309 2.3. Behavioral assessment studies. 310 3. Discussion . 311 4. Recommendations for future research . 311 References...................................................................................................... 312 1. Introduction Hope, 2001; Perowne & Mansell, 2002; Wenzel & Holt, 2003). However, given that these situations also cause fear in persons The aim of the present review is to clarify the distinction with solely public speaking fears, it is not really clear how suitable between public speaking anxiety and social anxiety within the they are for studying social anxiety. If anxiety that is restricted to framework of social phobia subtyping. Knowledge about this topic public speaking situations and anxiety that is more widespread to is important not only for clinical practice but might also be useful all kinds of social interaction situations relate to two different to improve the validity of empirical studies on social phobia. The subtypes of social anxiety, studies in this domain could be affected reason for this is that impromptu speech tasks and oral in two ways. (1) Speech-anxious-only individuals who do not meet presentations in front of an audience are frequently used in order the criteria of severe impairment and distress needed for a social to study the correlates of social phobia or social anxiety (e.g., Boone phobia diagnosis would participate in normal control groups but et al., 1999; Hirsch, Clark, Mathews, & Williams, 2003; Norton & might be as anxious as or perhaps even more anxious than socially phobic individuals in this kind of situation. (2) On the other hand, speech-anxious-only individuals who do meet the criteria would * Corresponding author. Tel.: +31 71 527 3673; fax: +31 71 527 3619. be assigned the general label of social phobia and be included in an E-mail address: [email protected] (A.W. Blo¨te). experimental group together with generalized social phobics. In 0887-6185/$ – see front matter ß 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.11.007 306 A.W. Blo¨te et al. / Journal of Anxiety Disorders 23 (2009) 305–313 both cases, the results of studies might present an incorrect picture 1.2. Subtype and severity continuum models of the characteristics of socially anxious individuals and therefore hinder our understanding of the disorder (Levin et al., 1993). The alternative to a subtype model of social phobia is a Consequently, evaluation of the position of public speaking anxiety continuum of severity model. In many empirical studies, sheer in social phobia subtyping is very important to clinical studies. quantitative differences – be it in number of fears, severity of symptoms, or other related variables – between social phobia 1.1. Short history of subtyping subgroups are considered as supporting a continuum model (e.g., Stein, Torgrud, & Walker, 2000; Vriends, Becker, Meyer, Michael, & In the frequently made distinction between social phobia and Margraf, 2007). This is in contrast with a subtype model that performance anxiety, public speaking anxiety pertains to perfor- requires the existence of qualitative differences between sub- mance anxiety. Discussions about criteria for the differential groups. It should be noted that conclusions based on the finding of diagnosis of performance anxiety and social phobia have been either quantitative or qualitative differences between subgroups numerous, especially since Heimberg, Holt, Schneier, Spitzer, and are not symmetrical. Mere quantitative differences do not support Liebowitz (1993) wrote their review on subtypes of social phobia. a subtype model but they do not preclude it either. If a study solely The term social phobia had first been introduced in the third finds quantitative differences a severity model suffices to describe edition of DSM (American Psychiatric Association, 1980), where the data. However, if qualitative differences are found the severity the diagnosis was generally intended for individuals whose fear model no longer suffices and therefore a subtype model is was limited to one specific situation like public speaking, eating or supported. drinking with others, or urinating in public restrooms. The Studies looking for qualitatively different subtypes have mainly diagnostic criteria for social phobia were broadened in DSM-IIIR used factor analyses, cluster, and similarity analyses. Clusters of (American Psychiatric Association, 1987). It was recognized that interrelated fears found by factor analyses, or groups of individuals individuals with social phobia may exhibit fears in various with the same patterns of fears found by cluster analyses are interactional situations and a generalized subtype of social phobia regarded to support a subtype model. If subgroups have different was created. Individuals with primary fears of humiliation, patterns of correlations with secondary variables it is also taken as embarrassment and negative evaluation in most social situations evidence for a subtype model. Another criterion points to were brought together under this subtype. The remainder of differences between subgroups that are not in the expected individuals with social phobia has often been referred to as the direction (Hook & Valentiner, 2002), for example, individuals with nongeneralized group. This group consisted of individuals whose performance anxiety show less fear than people with generalized fears were either limited to performance situations or included social anxiety in most social situations, but in some specific several but not ‘most’ social situations. This subtype was not performance situations show more fear. Any differences in causes formally listed in the DSM-IIIR nomenclature. and prognosis of the subgroups would also support a subtype There has been considerable criticism of the treatment of social model. Finally, a comparison of subgroups with a normal control phobia subtypes in the DSM-IIIR. Heimberg et al. (1993) stated that group can bear evidence on qualitative differences between the the two-part structure of generalized versus nongeneralized subgroups involved. If one subgroup differs quantitatively from a subtypes should be rearranged into a three-part structure. normal control group on a certain secondary variable and another According to Heimberg et al. this structure would include (a) a subgroup does not, it suggests that the two subgroups are generalized subtype for persons whose anxiety is evident in most qualitatively different, one having ‘‘abnormal’’ and the other social situations, (b) a nongeneralized subtype for persons who having ‘‘normal’’ responses. experience anxiety in social interaction situations but demonstrate Two review studies concluded that qualitative differences exist at least one broad domain of social functioning in which they do between the generalized social phobia subtype on the one hand not experience clinically meaningful anxiety, and (c) a circum- and nongeneralized or specific subtypes on the other (Hofmann, scribed subtype for persons whose anxiety is evident in a limited Heinrichs, & Moscovitch, 2004; Hook & Valentiner, 2002). Hook number of specific situations (e.g., speaking, eating, or writing in and Valentiner’s conclusion was based on the fact that some public). Subtype (b) was hence filling the apparent gap between studies present evidence consistent with a qualitative but not with fearing a limited number of specific social situations and fearing an exclusively quantitative distinction: (1) The generalized socially most social situations. anxious individuals fear social interaction situations, whereas Due to insufficient empirical evidence, however, there was individuals with specific social anxiety fear performance situa- not enough support for the adoption of a tripartite model tions. (2) In a speech task, individuals with
Recommended publications
  • Name of Clinician Who Filled out This Form
    HOME HEALTH RE-REGISTRATION/CONCURRENT REVIEW TEMPLATE ALL FIELDS WITH * ARE REQUIRED Provider EDS/CMAP ID # (Medicaid 9-digit ID) Name of clinician who filled out this form Credentials/Title Contact number _________________________________Ext: _________________ Facility/Provider Name Telephone Number Facility/Provider Service Location Member Name Medicaid/Consumer ID# DOB: AND/OR SSN: ________________ 1) *Is this a new registration for a client already in outpatient treatment within your agency/practice? YES NO If APPLICABLE, PLEASE INDICATE IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING NEED TO BE UPDATED 2) *Behavioral Diagnoses (Primary is Required) *Diagnosis Code: _______________ *Description_________________________________________________ *Diagnostic Category: _____________________________________________________________________ Diagnosis Code: _______________ Description_________________________________________________ Diagnostic Category: _______________________________________________________________________ 3) *Primary Medical Diagnoses (Primary is required or indicate “None” or “Unknown”) *Diagnosis Code: _______________ *Description_________________________________________________ *Diagnostic Category: _____________________________________________________________________ Diagnosis Code: _______________ Description_________________________________________________ Diagnostic Category: _____________________________________________________________________ 4) *Social Elements Impacting Diagnoses (Required - Check all that apply) None Educational problems
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook of Medical Psychiatry
    I II III Handbook of Medical Psychiatry SECOND EDITION David P. Moore M.D. Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, University of Louisville School of Medicine; Frazier Rehab Institute, Louisville, Kentucky James W. Jefferson M.D. Distinguished Senior Scientist, Madison Institute of Medicine, Inc.; Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison IV ELSEVIER MOSBY An Affiliate of Elsevier 170 S Independence Mall W. 300E. Philadelphia, PA 19106-3399 HANDBOOK OF MEDICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2nd Edition•ISBN 0-323-02911-6 Copyright © 2004, 1996,Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Health Sciences Rights Department in Philadelphia, PA, USA: phone: (+1) 215 238 7869, fax: (+1) 215 238 2239, e-mail: [email protected]. You may also complete your request on-line via the Elsevier homepage (http://www.elsevier.com.proxy.hsclib. sunysb.edu), by selecting ‘Customer Support’ and then ‘Obtaining Permissions’. NOTICE Medicine is an ever-changing field. Standard safety precautions must be followed, but as new research and clinical experience broaden our knowledge, changes in treatment and drug therapy may become necessary or appropriate. Readers are advised to check the most current product information provided by the manufacturer of each drug to be administered to verify the recommended dose, the method and duration of administration, and contraindications. It is the responsibility of the licensed physician, relying on experience and knowledge of the patient, to determine dosages and the best treatment for each individual patient.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Phobia and Personality Disorders: Comorbidity and Treatment Issues
    Social phobia and personality disorders: comorbidity and treatment issues Van Velzen, Catharina, Johanna, Maria Social phobia and personality disorders: comorbidity and treatment issues/ Catharina, Johanna, Maria (Carol) van Velzen Thesis Groningen – With ref. – With summary in Dutch. ISBN: 90-901-5987-8 Subject headings: social phobia / personality disorder/ exposure in vivo/ comorbidity Cover design: Marbles on Ruby Red Carol van Velzen & Robert Mijdendorp Printed by: Grafisch centrum, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen RIJKSUNIVERSITEIT GRONINGEN Social Phobia and Personality Disorders: Comorbidity and Treatment Issues PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van het doctoraat in de Psychologische, Pedagogische en Sociologische Wetenschappen aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen op gezag van de Rector Magnificus, dr. F. Zwarts, in het openbaar te verdedigen op donderdag 12 september 2002 om 16.00 uur door Catharina Johanna Maria van Velzen geboren op 10 maart 1967 te Schipluiden Promotor : Prof. dr. P.M.G. Emmelkamp Co-promotor : Dr. A. Scholing Referent : Dr. F. Luteijn Beoordelingscommissie : Prof. dr. A.R. Arntz : Prof. dr. C.P.D.R. Schaap : Prof. dr. Ph. Spinhoven Dankwoord Bij mijn afscheid van de afdeling Klinische Psychologie, inmiddels alweer zeven jaar geleden, heb ik gezegd dat ik zeer veel geleerd had, zowel professioneel als persoonlijk, en dat niemand me dat meer kon afnemen, ook al zou het proefschrift er nooit komen. Nu kan ik zeggen: het proefschrift is er wel gekomen! Aan zowel dit resultaat als aan mijn “leerproces” hebben een groot aantal mensen een bijdrage geleverd. Dit is de plek om ze te bedanken. Allereerst wil ik Agnes Scholing en Paul Emmelkamp bedanken voor de eerste – prettige - kennismaking met het doen van onderzoek.
    [Show full text]
  • Relations Among Symptoms of Social Phobia Subtypes, Avoidant Personality Disorder, Panic, and Depression
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Behavior Therapy 41 (2010) 2–13 www.elsevier.com/locate/bt Relations Among Symptoms of Social Phobia Subtypes, Avoidant Personality Disorder, Panic, and Depression Shawn A. Carter Kevin D. Wu Northern Illinois University reflect social fears and avoidance. In DSM-IV-TR This study's primary goal was to examine relations between (APA, 2000), APD and severe GSP are so closely symptoms of specific social phobia (SSP), generalized social related that the following statement summarizes phobia (GSP), avoidant personality disorder (APD), and their differential diagnosis: “There appears to be a panic and depression. Past research has suggested a single great deal of overlap between Avoidant Personality social phobia continuum in which SSP displays less Disorder and Social Phobia, Generalized Type, so symptom severity than GSP or APD. We found SSP much so that they may be alternative conceptuali- symptoms correlated less strongly with depression but zations of the same or similar conditions” (APA, more strongly with panic relative to both GSP and APD 2000, p. 720). symptoms. These findings challenge a unidimensional In addition to significant overlap between social model of social phobia, suggesting a multidimensional phobia and APD, researchers have found broad model may be more appropriate. These findings also inform overlap among all of the anxiety disorders and also current research aimed at classifying mood and anxiety between anxiety and mood disorders (e.g., T. A. disorders more broadly by identifying that the different Brown, Campbell, Lehman, Grisham, & Mancill, factors of fear versus distress appear to underlie different 2001; T. A. Brown, Chorpita, & Barlow, 1998 Clark subtypes of social phobia.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacological Aspects
    Pharmacological aspects Psychopharmacology of anxiety disorders Giovanni B. Cassano, MD; Nicolò Baldini Rossi, MD; Stefano Pini, MD A nxiety disorders are the most common and among the most disabling of mental disorders in adults and adolescents.1 Although many are highly circum- scribed fears of mild-to-moderate severity, it has been estimated by the Epidemiological Catchment Area (ECA) study2 that approximately one quarter of people will experience severe symptoms, disability, and handicap as a consequence of anxiety disorders at some time dur- ing their lifetime.These disorders are associated with sig- nificant morbidity3 and increased mortality, probably as a consequence of increased suicide rates among suffer- Exposure of the general population to a 1:4 lifetime risk of ers.The direct and indirect costs to the health service and disabling anxiety has inspired generations of fundamental economy are considerable.Although persons who suffer and clinical psychopharmacologists, from the era of the from anxiety disorders are high consumers of all types of earliest benzodiazepines (BZ) to that of the selective sero- health services, only a minority receive specific help.4 tonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and related compounds, The spectrum of anxiety disorders includes generalized eg, the serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors anxiety disorder (GAD), panic disorder (PD) and ago- (SNRIs). This comprehensive practical review summarizes raphobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), phobic current therapeutic research across the spectrum of indi- disorder (including social phobia), and posttraumatic vidual disorders: generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), panic stress disorder (PTSD). With the discovery of new psy- disorder (PD) and agoraphobia (social anxiety disorder), chotropic medications, specific diagnosis within this spec- compulsive disorder (OCD), phobic disorder (including trum is essential because each of these disorders social phobia), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming Social Anxiety and Shyness Extract.Pdf
    CR007 – Overcoming Anxiety UK prelims:CR006 7/2/08 12:16 Page i GILLIAN BUTLER is a Fellow of the British Psychological Society and a founder member of the Academy of Cognitive Therapy. She works both for the NHS and for Oxford Cognitive Therapy Centre. Through ten years of clinical research with the University of Oxford, she helped to develop and evaluate cognitive behavioral treatments for social phobia and for Generalized Anxiety Disorder. She has a special clinical interest in the use of CBT during recovery from traumatic experiences in childhood and runs training workshops on a wide variety of topics relevant to practitioners of CBT, in the UK and other countries. She is particularly interested in making the prod- ucts of research available to the general public and, in addi- tion to being the author of Overcoming Social Anxiety and Shyness, she is co-author of Manage Your Mind: The Mental Fitness Guide and of Psychology: A Very Short Introduction. CR007 – Overcoming Anxiety UK prelims:CR006 7/2/08 12:16 Page ii The aim of the Overcoming series is to enable people with a range of common problems and disorders to take control of their own recovery program. Each title, with its specially tailored program, is devised by a practising clinician using the latest techniques of cognitive behavioral therapy – techniques which have been shown to be highly effective in changing the way patients think about themselves and their problems. The series was initiated in 1993 by Peter Cooper, Professor of Psychology at Reading University and Research Fellow at the University of Cambridge in the UK whose original volume on overcoming bulimia nervosa and binge-eating continues to help many people in the USA, the UK and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Stress Associated with the Onset of Panic Disorder and Social Phobia
    Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects Psychology 1994 Types of Stress Associated with the Onset of Panic Disorder and Social Phobia Diana L. Johnson '94 Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/psych_honproj Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Johnson '94, Diana L., "Types of Stress Associated with the Onset of Panic Disorder and Social Phobia" (1994). Honors Projects. 79. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/psych_honproj/79 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. • Types of Stress 1 Types of Stress Associated with the Onset of Panic Disorder and Social Phobia Diana L. Johnson Illinois Wesleyan University ticl c' \ , ' Running Head: TYPES OF STRESS Types of Stress 2 Abstract The present study examined the association of different types of stress with the onset of both panic disorder and social phobia. Twenty-three subjects who met the DSM-III-R criteria for panic disorder and twenty-three subjects who met the DSM-III-R criteria for social phobia were matched on the variables of sex, race, level of education, and time of retrospection.
    [Show full text]
  • Adolescent Females with High-Functioning
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 11-3-2015 Adolescent Females with High-Functioning ASD: Self and Mothers’ Perspectives of Their choS ol and Social Experiences Lindsey Land University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Educational Psychology Commons, Psychology Commons, and the Special Education and Teaching Commons Scholar Commons Citation Land, Lindsey, "Adolescent Females with High-Functioning ASD: Self and Mothers’ Perspectives of Their chooS l and Social Experiences" (2015). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5980 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Adolescent Females with High-Functioning ASD: Self and Mothers’ Perspectives of Their School and Social Experiences by Lindsey Land A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Educational Specialist Department of Educational and Psychological Studies College of Education University of South Florida Major Professor: Linda Raffaele Mendez, Ph.D. Robert Dedrick, Ph.D. Phyllis Jones, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 30, 2015 Keywords: autism, girls, qualitative, education, parents Copyright © 2015, Lindsey Land TABLE OF CONTENTS List
    [Show full text]
  • Social Anxiety Disorder – an Overview
    Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing www.iiste.org ISSN 2422-8419 An International Peer-reviewed Journal Vol.27, 2016 Social Anxiety Disorder – An Overview Portia Osuji 1,2* 1.College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria 2.University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria Abstract Background: Social anxiety disorder (SAD), a type of anxiety disorder, is one of the most common psychiatric disorders. Early SAD symptoms often go undetected in the community. Thus, the disorder tends to run a chronic course.It is important to improve awareness about this disorder and to identify the socio-cultural factors which may affect health-seeking behaviors as well as coping skills in SAD. Methods: A detailed literature review was conducted with a focus on the worldwide prevalence, identification of SAD and how socio-cultural elements influence the health-seeking behavior of sufferers. Factors affecting treatment and current therapeutic methods as well as possible negative coping skills employed and their attendant implications were also identified. Results: SAD has a worldwide distribution. Prevalence rates vary slightly across and within countries. Socio-cultural dynamics significantly influence prevalence rates, health-seeking behaviour of patients and their care-givers as well as factors affecting treatment. Conclusion: There is an imperative need for socio-cultural adaptation of investigative tools used in epidemiological surveys. Clinicians need to be aware of the prevailing socio-cultural dynamics and how it affects clinical presentation, treatment approach and possible outcomes for SAD. This would facilitate the institution of appropriate interventions and enhance patient satisfaction. Keywords: Social Anxiety Disorders, factors, Health-seeking behaviour, Implications, factors affecting therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Macquarie University Researchonline
    Macquarie University ResearchOnline This is the author version of an article published as: Hudson JL and Rapee RM (2000) The Origins of social phobia. Behavior Modification, 24:1, pp. 102‐129. Access to the published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0145445500241006 Copyright: Sage Publications 1 THE ORIGINS OF SOCIAL PHOBIA Jennifer L. Hudson & Ronald M. Rapee Department of Psychology, Macquarie University Sydney. NSW 2109. Australia Hudson , J.L. & Rapee, R.M. (2000). The origins of social phobia. Behavior Modification, 24, 1, 102-129. Reprints requests to Jennie Hudson, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] Running Head: Origins of Social Phobia 2 3 Abstract A greater understanding of the origins of social phobia is much needed. The research to date is limited by the relatively small number of studies that sample clinical populations of individuals with social phobia. There is however, research derived from related areas such as shyness, social anxiety, self-consciousness, peer-neglect and social withdrawal that contribute to a richer understanding of the etiology of social fears. Combining these areas of research, the present review addresses four main factors which may be important to the origins of social phobia: i) genetic factors, ii) family factors, iii) other environment factors and iv) development factors. 4 The Origins of Social Phobia Social phobia has only begun to receive extensive attention in the literature in the last decade. Within that time the focus of research has been on understanding the nature and maintenance of the disorder (Clark & Wells, 1995; Rapee & Heimberg, 1997; Schlenker & Leary, 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Subtypes of Social Phobia: Are They of Any Use? Noortje Vriends A,*, Eni S
    Journal of Anxiety Disorders 21 (2007) 59–75 Subtypes of social phobia: Are they of any use? Noortje Vriends a,*, Eni S. Becker b, Andrea Meyer b, Tanja Michael a, Ju¨rgen Margraf a a Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Basel, Switzerland b Department of Clinical Psychology, Radboud University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands Received 30 January 2006; received in revised form 24 April 2006; accepted 15 May 2006 Abstract This study investigated the existence of DSM-IV social phobia subtype models in the community. Data came from the Dresden Predictor Study of a representative sample of 1877 German women (aged 18–24 years) who completed a diagnostic interview and filled out various self-report questionnaires. The number of feared social situations was distributed continuously without a clear-cut for delineation of subtypes and significantly increased functional impairment, comorbidity, subjective need for psychotherapy, seeking psychotherapeutic help and dysfunctional attitudes, and decreased social support and mental health. Subtype models based on the number (1, 2–4 and >4) and type (‘formal speaking fear’ versus ‘other fears’) of social fear did not have extra value above the continuum model of social phobia. The heterogeneity within social phobia has to be seen as a continuum of severity of social phobia, with a greater number of feared situations associated with more functional, social and psychological disability. # 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Social phobia; Subtypes; Epidemiology; Anxiety disorders; Generalized; Social anxiety disorder 1. Introduction Social phobia (social anxiety disorder) is an anxiety disorder characterized by an intense fear of embarrassment or humiliation in social and performance situations (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Module Content Page Introduction Cognitive Disorders
    M. A. Al-Sughayir - Manual of Basic Psychiatry / Draft 3 - 2013 Introduction Module Content Page 1- Psychiatry: Definition - Scope (Knowledge - Skills- Attitude). 3-4 Importance of Psychiatry Clerkship & Advice. Introduction 2-Diagnosis and Classification in Psychiatry. 5-6 3- Etiology in Psychiatry. 7-9 4- Psychiatric Assessment (History, MSE, MMSE). 10-16 5- Signs and Symptoms (Psychopathology) in Psychiatry. 17-21 Test-1 22-25 Introduction 27 Delirium 28-30 Cognitive Dementia 31-33 Disorders Amnestic Syndrome 34 ------ Alcohol abuse & Delirium Tremens 35-38 Psychosomatic Abuse of Anxiolytics, sedatives & hypnotics 39 Medicine Abuse of inhalants 40 & Abuse of opioids 41 Somatoform Head injury- Neuropsychiatric aspects 42 Disorder Psychosomatic Medicine & C-L Psychiatry 43-51 Somatoform Disorders 52-54 Test-2 56-59 Objectives , Definition , clinical features , & required clinical skills, & DDx 61 Psychotic Disorders 62 Psychotic Schizophrenia 63-66 Disorders Substance-induced psychosis 67 Personality disorders - cluster A 68 Aggressive / violent patient 69 Antipsychotics 70-73 E C T (Electroconvulsive therapy) 74 Test-3 75 Introduction - Definitions-Episodes vs. Disorders 81 Mood Major Depressive Episode(MDE) & Major Depressive Disorder(MDD) 82-85 Disorders Postpartum Depression - Dysthymic Disorder 86 Antidepressants 87-88 Suicide - Parasuicide 89 -90 Manic-Hypomanic-Mixed Episodes 91 Bipolar I & II 92-93 Mood Stabilizers 94 Personality disorders - cluster B 95-96 Test-4 97 -100 Differential diagnosis of anxiety disorders 103-104 Anxiety Panic disorder. 105 Disorders Agoraphobia - Dependent personality disorder 106 - 107 & Social phobia- Avoidant personality disorder- Specific phobia 108 -109 Psychological Generalized anxiety disorder ( GAD) 110 Treatments Obsessive compulsive disorder ( OCD ) - OCPD 111-112 Acute /post traumatic stress disorders(PTSD) - Adjustment d.
    [Show full text]