SA09CV00082 DOC(Anx).Pdf
1 O/JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Captain Pamela Barnett, et al., ) CASE NO. SACV 09-0082 DOC (ANx) ) 12 Plaintiffs, ) ) O R D E R REGARDING 13 v. ) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO ) DISMISS 14 Barack H. Obama, et al., ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 ) ) 18 ) ) 19 ________________________________ ) 20 Before the Court is Defendants President Barack H. Obama (“Obama” or “President”), 21 Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton (“Clinton”), Joseph Biden (“Biden”), and Robert Gates’ 22 (“Gates”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. After considering the moving, 23 opposing, reply, and sur-reply papers, as well as the parties’ oral argument, the Court hereby 24 rules as follows. 25 I. BACKGROUND 26 A. Introduction 27 On January 20, 2009, the day on which Barack Obama was sworn in as President and 28 1 took office, Plaintiffs brought this suit. The action was filed at 3:26 p.m. Pacific standard time, 2 following President Obama’s formal assumption of office. The suit alleges, in pertinent part, 3 that President Obama does not meet the qualifications required for the Office of the President, as 4 specified by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution, which reads, “No 5 Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the 6 Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.” More specifically, 7 Plaintiffs allege that the President has not shown that he is a “natural born citizen” of the United 8 States and assert that he should have to establish his citizenship by “clear-and-convincing 9 evidence.” Plaintiffs argue that despite the fact that President Obama has produced a birth 10 certificate from the state of Hawaii, there is evidence to show that the President was actually 11 born in Kenya, thus making him ineligible to be President.
[Show full text]