DOCSLIB.ORG

CLEO Contributions to Tau Physics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CLEO Contributions to Tau Physics CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by CERN Document Server 1 CLEO Contributions to Tau Physics a Alan. J. Weinstein ∗ aCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Representing the CLEO Collaboration We review many of the contributions of the CLEO experiment to tau physics. Topics discussed are: branching fractions for major decay modes and tests of lepton universality; rare decays; forbidden decays; Michel parameters and spin physics; hadronic sub-structure and resonance parameters; the tau mass, tau lifetime, and tau neutrino mass; searches for CP violation in tau decay; tau pair production, dipole moments, and CP violating EDM; and tauphysicsatCLEO-IIIandatCLEO-c. + + 1. Introduction and decay, e.g.,in[3]e e− Υ(nS) τ τ −. In addition to overall rate,→ one can→ search for Over the last dozen years, the CLEO Collab- small anomalous couplings. Rather generally, oration has made use of data collected by the these can be parameterized as anomalous mag- the CLEO-II detector [1] to measure many of the netic, and (CP violating) electric, dipole mo- properties of the tau lepton and its neutrino. Now + ments. With τ τ − final states, one can study that the experiment is making a transition from the spin structure of the final state; this is per- operation in the 10 GeV (B factory) region to the haps the most sensitive way to search for anoma- 3-5 GeV tau-charm factory region [2], it seemed lous couplings. We will return to this subject in to the author and the Tau02 conference organiz- section 9.1. ers to be a good time to review the contributions Measuring the production rate at 10 GeV is of the CLEO experiment to tau physics. We are only interesting if it is precise: < 1%. This has consciously omitting results from CLEO-I (data proven to be difficult at CLEO, for several rea- taken before 1989). The author has chosen to sons. take a semi-critical approach, emphasizing both First, it is desirable to do an inclusive selec- the strengths and weaknesses of tau physics at + tion of τ τ − final states, so that production rates CLEO: past, present, and future. don’t depend on decay branching fractions, which were not measured at the 1% level in the early 2. Tau Production at 10 GeV part of the last decade. It’s difficult to select taus + inclusively, because backgrounds from qq¯, e e−, We begin by discussing a topic on which CLEO + µ µ− and two-photon are less easily distinguish- has not published: tau pair production. + able from τ τ − than at LEP, and they depend on + In e e− collisions, one can study taus in pro- tau decay mode. It’s not really hard, but it’s hard duction and/or decay. The production reac- to get precise selection efficiencies. In the end, tau + + tion e e− γ∗ τ τ − is governed by well- → → selection at CLEO always had smaller efficien- understood QED. As such, it is not terribly inter- cies and/or larger backgrounds, and often also esting (or at least, nowhere near as interesting as larger systematic errors, than analogous analyses + ( ) + studying e e− γ∗/Z ∗ τ τ − at LEP I and → → at LEP. LEP II). CLEO has studied resonance production To measure the production cross-section, one needs a precise luminosity measurement, with an ∗Work supported by the US Department of Energy and National Science Foundation. error << 1%. At CLEO, we selected large angle 2 Table 1 3.1. One-prong problem Main decay modes of the τ lepton. In the early 90’s, the “tau one-prong” problem τ eνν 18% Br, univ, Michel was raging; the branching fractions for exclusively → τ ≈ τ µνν 17% Br, univ, Michel reconstructed tau decays didn’t add up to 1 [6]. → τ ≈ τ πν, Kν 12% Br, univ The resolution of this discrepancy required preci- → τ ≈ τ ππν 25% Br, ρ, ρ0,CVC,Π sion (sub-1%) branching fractions measurements. → τ ≈ τ Kπν 1.4% Br, K∗, K∗0 CLEO-II was a new detector; acceptances, → τ ≈ τ 3πν 18% Br, a , a0 , h in/efficiencies, and detector simulation needed to → τ ≈ 1 1 ντ τ Kππντ 0.8% Br, K1, K1b,W-Z be understood very well. Important issues in- → ≈ 0 τ 4πν 5% Br, ρ0,CVC cluded the detection of π ’s: they rarely merged → τ ≈ τ rare 2% 5π,6π, ηππ, ... into one shower, and CLEO obtained great m → ≈ γγ τ ηπν, b ν 1% 2nd-class currents resolution ( 6 MeV) with its CsI calorime- → 1 τ τ forbidden 1% neutrinoless decays ter. However,∼ soft photons could get lost; and → “splitoffs” from hadronic showers could fake pho- tons. Overall, ensuring reliable detection of π0’s resulted in a detection efficiency 50(1 0.03)%. Also, CLEO had poor K/π separation∼ over± most + + + Bhabhas (e e−), µ µ−, e e− γγ with rather of the interesting momentum range. We made high statistics. To get the luminosity,→ we need 0 progress using KS, with detection efficiency accurate predictions of the cross-section times se- 50%. Because of all this, it was hard to know the∼ lection efficiency from precision Monte Carlo sim- overall detection efficiency, after backgrounds, to ulations, incorporating accurate QED radiative better than 1%. corrections. Much less effort has gone into this at Ultimately, CLEO’s branching fraction mea- 10 GeV than at LEP! Each of these measurements surements were limited by knowledge of luminos- has small statistical errors, but the systematic er- ity (1%), cross-section (computed to order α with rors are of the order of 2%. CLEO got agree- KORALB [7], 1%), and knowledge of the de- ∼ ment between the 3 QED processes at the level tection efficiency∼ and backgrounds ( 1 2%). ∼+ − of 1% but not much better; the discrepancies are However, with millions of produced τ τ −,what likely to be in the QED Monte Carlos. CLEO we lacked in efficiency we made up for in statis- quotes a 1% systematic error on luminosity [4]. tics. The moral is that further progress in this By 1995, we made (1 2)% measurements of ∼ − 0 topic requires precision QED Monte Carlos. The branching fractions to eνντ , µνντ , π/Kντ , ππ ντ , 0 0 KKMC program [5] promises precision results, πnπ ντ ,3πντ ,3ππ ντ , etc.[8–11]. These mea- but it must be validated with careful computa- surements reduced the “tau one-prong” problem tional and experimental cross-checks. Consistent to insignificance by PDG 1996 [12]. We had also + + + results for e e−, µ µ−, e e− γγ are a good tested e/µ/τ charged-current coupling universal- → first step. Further, measurements of anomalous ity at the 1% level [8]. By then, LEP was mea- moments make use of the spin correlations in tau suring branching fractions with total errors much pair production at 10 GeV, so one must validate smaller than 1%. This came as quite a shock to the correct treatment of spin-dependence in the CLEO! It helped that the LEP experiments knew Monte Carlo. Nττ = σ quite well, as a by-product of their in- crediblyL successful electroweak program. 3. Tau decay physics at CLEO 4. Rare semi-hadronic decay modes CLEO pursued a systematic study of all tau de- cays during the 1990’s, learning much about the Rare semi-hadronic decay modes of the tau pro- tau, its neutrino, and low-energy meson dynam- vide unique laboratories for low-energy meson dy- ics. The main decay modes are listed in Table 1. namics, and tests of conservation laws. With the 3 Table 2 The ηπ− mode is a signature for second-class Measurements of branching fractions for rare (isospin-violating) currents. The ηK− mode pro- semi-hadronic τ decay modes by CLEO-II. 0 ceeds by SU(3)f violation. The ηπ−π mode proceeds by the Wess-Zumino anomalous current. + 0 3 The η3π signals, which are rich in sub-structure, (2π−π 2π ντ )=(5.3 0.4) 10− B ± × areshowninFig.2. (3π 2π+ν )=(7.8 0.6) 10 4 − τ − CLEO also observed the radiative decay modes B + 0 ± × 4 (2π−π 3π ν )=(2.2 0.5) 10− B τ ± × τ − e−ντ γ and τ − µ−ντ γ [22], and made the + 0 4 → → + (3π−2π π ντ )=(1.7 0.3) 10− first observation of the decays τ − e−e e−ν¯ ν B ± × → e τ 0 4 (5 events) and τ µ e+e ν¯ ν (1 event) [23]. (π−2π ων )=(1.5 0.5) 10− − − − µ τ B τ ± × → + 4 (2π−π ωντ )=(1.2 0.3) 10− B + 0 ± × 4 (3π−2π 2π ντ ) < 1.1 10− B × 50 100 0 6 45 (7π±(π )ντ ) < 2.4 10− . B × 40 80 35 60 30 25 40 20 Events/(50 MeV) Events/(50 MeV) Events/(50 15 Table 3 20 10 Measurements of τ decay modes involving kaons 5 0 0 from CLEO-II. 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2 M(2π -π + 3π0) (GeV) M(3π-2π+π0) (GeV) 4 (ν ηπ−) < 1.4 10− at 95% CL B τ × (ν ηK )=(2.6 0.5) 10 4 τ − − Figure 1. Mass distributions from τ 6πντ .The B 0 ± × 3 → (ν ηπ−π )=(1.7 0.3) 10− data are shown as data points with error bars, the B τ ± × + 4 lower histograms show various background mod- (ντ ηπ−π π−)=(3.4 0.8) 10− B 0 0 ± × 4 els, and the open solid histogram shows the model (ν ηπ−π π )=(1.4 0.6) 10− B τ ± × of the background plus tau decay signal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tau Electroweak Couplings
    Heavy Flavours 8, Southampton, UK, 1999 PROCEEDINGS Tau Electroweak Couplings Alan J. Weinstein∗ California Institute of Technology 256-48 Caltech Pasadena, CA 91125, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: We review world-average measurements of the tau lepton electroweak couplings, in both 0 + − − − decay (including Michel parameters) and in production (Z → τ τ and W → τ ντ ). We review the searches for anomalous weak and EM dipole couplings. Finally, we present the status of several other tau lepton studies: searches for lepton flavor violating decays, neutrino oscillations, and tau neutrino mass limits. 1. Introduction currents. This will reveal itself in violations of universality of the fermionic couplings. Most talks at this conference concern the study Here we review the status of the measure- of heavy quarks, and many focus on the diffi- ments of the tau electroweak couplings in both culties associated with the measurement of their production and decay. The following topics will electroweak couplings, due to their strong inter- be covered (necessarily, briefly, with little atten- actions. This contribution instead focuses on the tion to experimental detail). We discuss the tau one heavy flavor fermion whose electroweak cou- lifetime, the leptonic branching fractions (τ → plings can be measured without such difficulties: eνν and µνν), and the results for tests of uni- the tau lepton. Indeed, the tau’s electroweak versality in the charged current decay. We then couplings have now been measured with rather turn to measurements of the Michel Parameters, high precision and generality, in both produc- which probe deviations from the pure V − A tion and decay.
    [Show full text]
  • A Measurement of the Michel Parameters in Leptonic Decays of the Tau
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Kenneth Bloom Publications Research Papers in Physics and Astronomy 6-23-1997 A Measurement of the Michel Parameters in Leptonic Decays of the Tau R. Ammar University of Kansas - Lawrence Kenneth A. Bloom University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] CLEO Collaboration Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/physicsbloom Part of the Physics Commons Ammar, R.; Bloom, Kenneth A.; and Collaboration, CLEO, "A Measurement of the Michel Parameters in Leptonic Decays of the Tau" (1997). Kenneth Bloom Publications. 165. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/physicsbloom/165 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Research Papers in Physics and Astronomy at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kenneth Bloom Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. VOLUME 78, NUMBER 25 PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 23JUNE 1997 A Measurement of the Michel Parameters in Leptonic Decays of the Tau R. Ammar,1 P. Baringer,1 A. Bean,1 D. Besson,1 D. Coppage,1 C. Darling,1 R. Davis,1 N. Hancock,1 S. Kotov,1 I. Kravchenko,1 N. Kwak,1 S. Anderson,2 Y. Kubota,2 M. Lattery,2 J. J. O’Neill,2 S. Patton,2 R. Poling,2 T. Riehle,2 V. Savinov,2 A. Smith,2 M. S. Alam,3 S. B. Athar,3 Z. Ling,3 A. H. Mahmood,3 H. Severini,3 S. Timm,3 F. Wappler,3 A. Anastassov,4 S. Blinov,4,* J. E. Duboscq,4 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Tau-Lepton Decay Parameters
    58. τ -lepton decay parameters 1 58. τ -Lepton Decay Parameters Updated August 2011 by A. Stahl (RWTH Aachen). The purpose of the measurements of the decay parameters (also known as Michel parameters) of the τ is to determine the structure (spin and chirality) of the current mediating its decays. 58.1. Leptonic Decays: The Michel parameters are extracted from the energy spectrum of the charged daughter lepton ℓ = e, µ in the decays τ ℓνℓντ . Ignoring radiative corrections, neglecting terms 2 →2 of order (mℓ/mτ ) and (mτ /√s) , and setting the neutrino masses to zero, the spectrum in the laboratory frame reads 2 5 dΓ G m = τℓ τ dx 192 π3 × mℓ f0 (x) + ρf1 (x) + η f2 (x) Pτ [ξg1 (x) + ξδg2 (x)] , (58.1) mτ − with 2 3 f0 (x)=2 6 x +4 x −4 2 32 3 2 2 8 3 f1 (x) = +4 x x g1 (x) = +4 x 6 x + x − 9 − 9 − 3 − 3 2 4 16 2 64 3 f2 (x) = 12(1 x) g2 (x) = x + 12 x x . − 9 − 3 − 9 The quantity x is the fractional energy of the daughter lepton ℓ, i.e., x = E /E ℓ ℓ,max ≈ Eℓ/(√s/2) and Pτ is the polarization of the tau leptons. The integrated decay width is given by 2 5 Gτℓ mτ mℓ Γ = 3 1+4 η . (58.2) 192 π mτ The situation is similar to muon decays µ eνeνµ. The generalized matrix element with γ → the couplings gεµ and their relations to the Michel parameters ρ, η, ξ, and δ have been described in the “Note on Muon Decay Parameters.” The Standard Model expectations are 3/4, 0, 1, and 3/4, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1801.05670V1 [Hep-Ph] 17 Jan 2018 Most Adequate (Mathematical) Language to Describe Nature
    Quantum Field Theory and the Electroweak Standard Model* A.B. Arbuzov BLTP JINR, Dubna, Russia Abstract Lecture notes with a brief introduction to Quantum field theory and the Stan- dard Model are presented. The lectures were given at the 2017 European School of High-Energy Physics. The main features, the present status, and problems of the Standard Model are discussed. 1 Introduction The lecture course consists of four main parts. In the Introduction, we will discuss what is the Standard Model (SM) [1–3], its particle content, and the main principles of its construction. The second Section contains brief notes on Quantum Field Theory (QFT), where we remind the main objects and rules required further for construction of the SM. Sect. 3 describes some steps of the SM development. The Lagrangian of the model is derived and discussed. Phenomenology and high-precision tests of the model are overviewed in Sect. 4. The present status, problems, and prospects of the SM are summarized in Conclusions. Some simple exercises and questions are given for students in each Section. These lectures give only an overview of the subject while for details one should look in textbooks, e.g., [4–7], and modern scientific papers. 1.1 What is the Standard Model? Let us start with the definition of the main subject of the lecture course. It is the so-called Standard Model. This name is quite widely accepted and commonly used to define a certain theoretical model in high energy physics. This model is suited to describe properties and interactions of elementary particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Results from Cleo
    RECENT RESULTS FROM CLEO Jon J. Thaler† University of Illinois Urbana, IL 61801 Representing the CLEO Collaboration ABSTRACT I present a selection of recent CLEO results. This talk covers mostly B physics, with one tau result and one charm result. I do not intend to be comprehensive; all CLEO papers are available on the web a t http://www.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLNS/CLEO.html. † Supported by DOE grant DOE-FG02-91ER-406677. In this talk I will discuss four B physics topics, and two others: • The semileptonic branching ratio and the “charm deficit.” • Hadronic decays and tests of factorization. • Rare hadronic decays and “CP engineering.” → ν • Measurement of Vcb using B Dl . • A precision measurement of the τ Michel parameters. • The possible observation of cs annihilation in hadronic Ds decay. One theme that will run throughout is the need, in an era of 10-5 branching fraction sensitivity and 1% accuracy, for redundancy and control over systematic error. B Semileptonic Decay and the Charm Deficit Do we understand the gross features of B decay? The answer to this question is important for two reasons. First, new physics may lurk in small discrepancies. Second, B decays form the primary background to rare B processes, and an accurate understanding of backgrounds will b e important to the success of experiments at the upcoming B factories. Compare measurements of the semileptonic branching fraction at LEP with those at the Υ(4S) (see figure 1) and with theory. One naïvely expects the LEP result to be 0.96 of the 4S result, because LEP measures Λ an inclusive rate, which is pulled down by the short B lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Michel Parameters Averages and Interpretation
    1 Michel Parameters BONN-HE-98-04 Averages and Interpretation a A. Stahl a Physikalisches Institut, Nussallee 12, 53115 Bonn, Germany e-mail: [email protected] onn.de The new measurements of Michel parameters in decays are combined to world averages. From these mea- (26-October-1998) surements mo del indep endent limits on non-standard mo del couplings are derived and interpretations in the Preprint - Server framework of sp eci c mo dels are given. Alower limit of 2:5 tan GeV on the mass of a charged Higgs b oson in mo dels with two Higgs doublets can b e set and a 229 GeV limit on a right-handed W -b oson in left-right symmetric mo dels (95 % c.l.). the two sections following these are dedicated to 1. INTRODUCTION an interpretation of the results in terms of two Now that you have seen several presentations sp eci c mo dels. I will not giveanintro duction to of new exp erimental results on the Lorentz struc- Michel Parameters in decays. There are excel- ture of the charged current mediating decays, lent reviews in the literature [1]. it is my task to present up dated world averages and interpretations. The question b eing what we 2. LEPTONIC DECAYS can learn from these numb ers in terms of new physics, what can we exclude or are there hints In the most general case the matrix elementof ab out where to go. This motivation is quite dif- the leptonic decays ! e and ! e ferent from what was driving p eople to study the can b e describ ed by the following Lorentz invari- Lorentz structure of muon decays.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University Schreyer Honors College
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS STUDYING THE USE OF MICHEL ELECTRONS TO CALIBRATE PINGU DYLAN D. LUTTON SPRING 2015 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for baccalaureate degrees in Physics with honors in Physics Reviewed and approved* by the following: Douglas Cowen Professor of Physics Thesis Supervisor Richard Robinett Professor of Physics Honors Adviser *Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i Abstract The IceCube Neutrino Detector System, located in the South Pole, is the largest neutrino detec- tor system ever made. A proposed addition to it is the Precision IceCube Next Generation Upgrade (PINGU), which would use more densely spaced detectors to allow for measurements of lower energy neutrinos, making it more sensitive to the neutrino mass hierarchy. A simulation of the PINGU detector system is used to determine its ability in making these measurements and to cali- brate its reconstruction of neutrino events. The muon neutrino is one of the three different flavors of neutrino, and will, upon undergoing a charged current interaction, release a muon that will later decay into a Michel electron. In this thesis we use the simulation of PINGU to see whether the Michel electron can be used to calibrate its reconstructions. Using ROOT to perform analysis on the data returned from our simulation, I found that we can expect that 0.2% of νµ events in PINGU should be highly suitable for use in calibration via the Michel electron. If a muon from a νµ charged current event stops beneath one of our DOMs, then the Michel electron that it later decays into will give light to this DOM.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications (Selected List from 467 Publications)
    Publications (selected list from 467 publications): 1) M. Ambrosio et al. MACRO Collaboration. SEARCH FOR DIFFUSE NEUTRINO FLUX FROM ASTROPHYSICAL COURSES WITH MACRO. Astroparticle Phys. 19, 1 (2003). 2) M. Ambrosio et al. MACRO Collaboration. SEARCH FOR COSMIC RAY SOURCES USING MUONS DETECTED BY THE MACRO EXPERIMENT. Astroparticle Phys. 18, 615 (2003). 3) M. Ambrosio et al. MACRO Collaboration. SEARCH FOR THE SIDEREAL AND SOLAR DIURNAL MODULATIONS IN THE TOTAL MACRO MUON DATA SET. Phys. Rev. D67: 042002 (2003). 4) M. Ambrosio et al. MACRO Collaboration. FINAL RESULTS OF MAGNETIC MONOPOLE SEARCHES WITH THE MACRO EXPERIMENT. Eur.Phys.J.C25:511-522 (2002). 5) B. C. Barish. THE SCIENCE AND DETECTION OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVES. Braz.J.Phys.32:831-837 (2002). 6) B.C. Barish, G. Billingsley, J. Camp, W.P. Kells, G.H. Sanders, S.E. Whitcomb, L.Y. Zhang, R.Y. Zhu (Caltech, Kellogg Lab), P.Z. Deng, Jun Xu, G.Q. Zhou, Yong Zong Zhou (Shanghai, Inst. Optics, Fine Mech.). DEVELOPMENT OF LARGE SIZE SAPPHIRE CRYSTALS FOR LASER INTERFEROMETER GRAVITATIONAL- WAVE OBSERVATORY. Prepared for IEEE 2001 Nuclear Science Symposium (NSS) and Medical Imaging Conference (MIC), San Diego, California, 4-10 Nov 2001. Published in IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci.49:1233-1237, 2002. 7) M. Ambrosia, et. al. MACRO Collaboration. NEUTRINO ASTRONOMY WITH THE MACRO DETECTOR. Astrophys. J. 546, 1038 (2001). 8) M. Ambrosio et al. MACRO Collaboration. MATTER EFFECTS IN UPWARD GOING MUONS AND STERILE NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS. Phys.Lett.B517:59- 66 (2001). 9) B. C. Barish. TAU NEUTRINO PHYSICS: AN INTRODUCTION. Prepared for 6th International Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics (TAU 00), Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of the Muon Decay Parameter 
    RAPID COMMUNICATIONS PHYSICAL REVIEW D 71, 071101(R) (2005) Measurement of the muon decay parameter A. Gaponenko,1 R. Bayes,7,* Yu. I. Davydov,7,† P. Depommier,4 J. Doornbos,7 W. Faszer,7 M. C. Fujiwara,7 C. A. Gagliardi,6 D. R. Gill,7 P. Green,1 P. Gumplinger,7 M. D. Hasinoff,2 R. S. Henderson,7 J. Hu,7 B. Jamieson,2 P. Kitching,1 D. D. Koetke,8 A. A. Krushinsky,3 Yu. Yu. Lachin,3 J. A. Macdonald,7,‡ R. P. MacDonald,1 G. M. Marshall,7 E. L. Mathie,5 L. V. Miasoedov,3 R. E. Mischke,7 J. R. Musser,6 P.M. Nord,8 M. Nozar,7 K. Olchanski,7 A. Olin,7,* R. Openshaw,7 T. A. Porcelli,7,x J.-M. Poutissou,7 R. Poutissou,7 M. A. Quraan,1 N. L. Rodning,1,‡ V. Selivanov,3 G. Sheffer,7 B. Shin,7,k F. Sobratee,1 T. D. S. Stanislaus,8 R. Tacik,5 V.D. Torokhov,3 R. E. Tribble,6 M. A. Vasiliev,6 and D. H. Wright7,{ 1University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2J1, Canada 2University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada 3Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, 123182, Russia 4University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada 5University of Regina, Regina, SK, S4S 0A2, Canada 6Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA 7TRIUMF, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2A3, Canada 8Valparaiso University, Valparaiso, Indiana 46383, USA (Received 17 October 2004; published 4 April 2005) The muon decay parameter has been measured by the TWIST collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of the Michel Parameters and the Τ Neutrino Helicity in Τ Decay
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Kenneth Bloom Publications Research Papers in Physics and Astronomy 11-1-1997 Determination of the Michel parameters and the τ neutrino helicity in τ decay J. P. Alexander Cornell University Kenneth A. Bloom University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] CLEO Collaboration Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/physicsbloom Part of the Physics Commons Alexander, J. P.; Bloom, Kenneth A.; and Collaboration, CLEO, "Determination of the Michel parameters and the τ neutrino helicity in τ decay" (1997). Kenneth Bloom Publications. 170. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/physicsbloom/170 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Research Papers in Physics and Astronomy at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kenneth Bloom Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. PHYSICAL REVIEW D VOLUME 56, NUMBER 9 1 NOVEMBER 1997 Determination of the Michel parameters and the t neutrino helicity in t decay J. P. Alexander, C. Bebek, B. E. Berger, K. Berkelman, K. Bloom, D. G. Cassel, H. A. Cho, D. M. Coffman, D. S. Crowcroft, M. Dickson, P. S. Drell, K. M. Ecklund, R. Ehrlich, R. Elia, A. D. Foland, P. Gaidarev, R. S. Galik, B. Gittelman, S. W. Gray, D. L. Hartill, B. K. Heltsley, P. I. Hopman, J. Kandaswamy, P. C. Kim, D. L. Kreinick, T. Lee, Y. Liu, G. S. Ludwig, J. Masui, J. Mevissen, N. B. Mistry, C. R. Ng, E. Nordberg, M. Ogg,* J. R. Patterson, D. Peterson, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of the Michel Parameters in Leptonic Tau Decays
    EUROPEAN LABORATORY FOR PARTICLE PHYSICS CERN-EP/98-104 June 29, 1998 Measurement of the Michel Parameters in Leptonic Tau Decays The OPAL Collaboration Abstract The Michel parameters of the leptonic τ decays are measured using the OPAL detector at LEP. The parameters ρ`, ξ`,(ξδ)` (with ` =e,µ)andηµ are extracted from the energy spectra of the charged decay leptons and from their energy-energy correlations. A new method involving a global likelihood fit of Monte Carlo generated events with complete detector simulation and background treatment has √ been applied to the data recorded at center-of-mass energies close to s = mZ0 corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 155 pb−1.Ife-µuniversality is assumed and inferring the τ polarization from neutral current data, the measured Michel parameters are: ρ =0.781 ± 0.028 ± 0.018, ξ =0.98 ± 0.22 ± 0.10, η =0.027 ± 0.055 ± 0.005, ξδ =0.65 ± 0.14 ± 0.07, where the value of η has been constrained using the published OPAL measurements of the leptonic branching ratios and the τ lifetime. Limits on non-standard coupling constants and on the masses of new gauge bosons are obtained. The results are in agreement with the V−A prediction of the Standard Model. (Submitted to The European Physical Journal C) The OPAL Collaboration K. Ackerstaff8, G. Alexander23, J. Allison16,N.Altekamp5, K.J. Anderson9, S. Anderson12, S. Arcelli2, S. Asai24, S.F. Ashby1,D.Axen29, G. Azuelos18,a, A.H. Ball17, E. Barberio8, R.J. Barlow16, R. Bartoldus3, J.R. Batley5, S. Baumann3,J.Bechtluft14, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of the Michel Parameters and the Average $\Tau
    EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CERN-PPE/96{46 March 26, 1996 Measurement of the Michel parameters and the average + + neutrino helicity from decays in e e ! The L3 Collab oration Abstract The Michel parameters , , and , the chirality parameter and the h p olarization P are measured using 32012 pair decays. Their values are extracted from the energy sp ectra of leptons and hadrons in ! l and ! l decays, the energy and decay angular distributions in ! decays, and the correlations in the energy sp ectra and angular distributions of the decay pro ducts. Assuming universality in leptonic and semileptonic decays, the results are =0:794 0:039 0:031, =0:25 0:17 0:11, =0:94 0:21 0:07, = 0:81 0:14 0:06, =0:970 0:053 0:011, and P = 0:154 0:018 0:012. h The measurement is in agreement with the VAhyp othesis for the weak charged current. Submitted to Phys. Lett. B Intro duction The sub ject of this pap er is an investigation of the Lorentz structure of the charged currentin leptonic and semileptonic decays. The undetected neutrinos and the unmeasured p olarization of the outgoing lepton allow the measurement of only four Michel parameters [1] in the leptonic 1) decays, ! l (l =e,). Of these four parameters, and describ e the isotropic part l of the lepton energy sp ectrum, while and describ e the angular distribution asymmetry of the sp ectrum with resp ect to the spin direction. In semileptonic decays, ! h 2) (h = ; K or ) the chirality parameter is interpreted as twice the average neutrino h helicity.
    [Show full text]