Coleopera: Cryptophagidae) from the Western Palearctic Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coleopera: Cryptophagidae) from the Western Palearctic Region © Entomologica Fennica. 24 June 2013 Species of Cryptophagus Herbst, 1792, belonging to the “dentatus group” (Coleopera: Cryptophagidae) from the Western Palearctic region José Carlos Otero & Colin Johnson Otero, J. C. & Johnson, C. 2013: Species of Cryptophagus Herbst, 1792, belong- ingtothe“dentatus group” (Coleopera: Cryptophagidae) from the Western Palearctic region. — Entomol. Fennica 24: 81–93. Eight species of the genus Cryptophagus Herbst, 1792, belonging to the “dentatus group” from the Palearctic Region are revised. The opinions of differ- ent authors about the value of the characteristics of the external anatomy are con- trasted, and an identification key and figures of the studied species are presented. J. C. Otero, Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, Faculty of Bio- logy, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Correspondent author’s e-mail: [email protected] C. Johnson, 17 Peaknaze Close, Glossop, Derbyshire, SK13 6UN, England; E-mail: [email protected] Received 5 June 2012, accepted 30 October 2012 1. Introduction with sampling made systematically and periodi- cally in different regions of the Iberian Peninsula, Coombs and Woodroffe wrote in 1955: “...the allow us to show natural interspecific variability dentatus group of sibling species has long caused for the species studied in this article, but we in no confusion in the genus... It is possible that they case detected specimens that made us suspect the may be hybrids among the other species...The existence of possible hybridisations. It is true that dentatus group is obviously a complex of incipi- the variability manifests itself as frequent atypical ent species...”. Most of the authors that have stud- shapes in the external anatomy, so it is necessary ied this genus emphasize the high degree of vari- to study the male genital organs in most cases. ability of the species that form part of this genus. The following species are recognised in the Coombs and Woodroffe (1955), Johnson (1988), group “dentatus”: C. dentatus (Herbst), C. denti- and Otero (2011), express the difficulty to recog- culatus Heer (= C. pilosus Gyllenhal, = pseudo- nise the majority of the species by the characteris- dentatus Bruce), C. insulicola Roubal (= acumi- tics of the external anatomy and point out the ne- natus Coombs & Woodroffe), C. puncticollis P. cessity to study the male genital organs. For in- H. Lucas (= rotundatus Coombs & Woodroffe), stance, some species of the genus Cryptophagus C. intermedius Bruce, C. inaequalis Reitter, C. (C. punctipennis Bris. and C. reflexus Rey = C. galilei Otero and C. aurelioi Otero. Three of the pallidus auctt. not Sturm) or those included in the species, C. dentatus, C. denticulatus and C. inter- genus Telmatophilus Heer are good examples of medius, can be recognised for their external anat- this. The study of a large number of specimens omy, even if they show a certain degree of vari- from different zoogeographical regions, together ability. For the other species, those characteristics 82 Otero & Johnson • ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 24 can be misleading, and it is necessary to study the 3.1. Key to species male genital organs. Their study shows that among all the species of this group, there is a great The key was created taking into account the similarity in the shape of the aedeagus and the in- works of Bruce (1936), Coombs and Woodroffe ternal sac and, in general, noticeable differences (1955), Dajoz (1959), Lohse (1967), Johnson in the morphology of the parameres and the (1988, 1992), Reška (1994), Lyubarsky (2002), sclerotized spines of the aedeagus (Reška 1994, Otero (2011) and Moncoutier (2002). All these Lyubarsky 2002, Otero 2011). works give valuable information about different aspects of the morphology and anatomy of the studied species. 2. Material and methods 1. Sides of pronotum (Figs. 1a, 4a, 7a) forming Terminology and measurements follow Otero angles from callosity to lateral tooth, and from (1997, 2011). Structures were measured under a toothtobase 2 Leica M205C stereomicroscope equipped with – Pronotum with parallel sides (Figs. 2a, 3a, 5a, an analysis system Application Suite. 6a, 8a) 4 The abbreviation WL is used for width/length 2. Straight apex of aedeagus (Fig. 7h); scleroti- ratio. The following acronyms are used to refer to zed rods linked in base (Fig. 7j) and endo- the collections, in which the examined specimens phallic orifice rounded and narrowed in apex. are deposited: Narrow parameres (Fig. 7i), 2 times longer than wide in base, sinuated internal margin CA: coll. F. Angelini, Francavilla Fontana, Italy and straight external one. Basal nodules not DA: coll. D. Agüin, Madeira covered by base of paramere. Area of pores HNHM: Hungarian Natural History Museum, without setae, equal to area with setae. 2 or 3 Budapest, Hungary apical setae, 0.75 times longer than paramere. IZRCL: Museo Civico di Zoologia, coll. Length: 2.0–2.1 mm Luigioni, Rome, Italy C. intermedius Bruce, 1934 MHNG: Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneva – Rounded and undulate apex of aedeagus. MNHU: Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt- Sclerotized rods not linked in base (Figs.1j, Universität, Berlin, Germany 4i) 3 NMW: Museo de Wien, Wien, Austria 3. Sclerotized rods (Fig. 1j); triangular para- MNCN: Museo Nacional Ciencias Naturales, meres (Fig. 1i), 2 times longer than wide in Madrid, Spain base. Area of pores without setae larger than MZL: Museum of Zoology, Lund University, area of pores with setae; strongly sinuated in- Lund, Sweden ternal margin and convex external margin. UA: Entomological collection, Universidad de Apical setae shorter than paramere. Length: Alicante, Spain 2.2–2.5 C. aurelioi Otero & López, 2011 USC: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, – Aedeageal apodeme with two sclerotized rods Spain at apex (Fig. 4i). Parameres (Fig. 4h) ex- tremely thin and with curved external edge. Two short apical setae and infrequent pores, 3. Taxonomy (Figs 1–8) latter ones either with or without bristles. Vis- ible endophalic orifice (Fig. 4g). Length: 1.7– The species of this group present the following 2.1 mm C. galilei Otero, 1997 characteristics: Side of the callosity poorly visi- 4. Pronotum slightly narrower than base of ble or not visible dorsally (Figs. 1a, 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a, elytra (Figs. 3b, 5b, 6b, 8b). Lateral tooth in 6a, 7a, 8a); weak dorsal margin, not surpassing middle of side. Long pubescence 5 the lateral margin of pronotum; aedeagus pro- – Pronotum (Fig. 2a,b) as wide as base of elytra, vided with a preputial sac with a structure finely square or slightly transverse (WL= 1.4–1.6). granular and a well-defined cap in the apex. Convergent sides in straight line from lateral ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 24 • Cryptophagus "dentatus group" (Coleopera) 83 tooth to base. Punctation of pronotum (Fig. ing almost entirely the base of paramere, but 2f) much stronger than punctation of elytra internal nodule covering only lateral margin (Fig. 2g). Apex of aedeagus rounded outside of paramere. Length: 2.0–3.0 mm and straight inside (Fig. 2h); preputial sac C. insulicola Roubal, 1919 well defined and granulated, with “cap” in – Simple sclerotized rods (Fig. 5j), dilated in apex; simple sclerotized rods of same width in base. 2 apical setae shorter than 0.75–0.8 × all their length, sharp in apex, and sometimes length of aedeagus. Base of paramere (Fig. 5i) sinuated. Oval parameres (Fig. 2i), elongated with bilateral nodule. Both nodules covered and rounded in apical zone, while with bilat- by base of paramere. Length: 2.3–2.5 mm eral nodule in base; area of pores without C. inaequalis Reitter, 1878 setae equal to area with setae. Numerous api- cal setae, 0.75 times longer than paramere. Length: 2.0–2.8 mm 3.2. Systematic list C. dentatus (Herbst, 1793) 5. Convergent sides of pronotum in straight line 3.2.1. Cryptophagus aurelioi from lateral tooth to base. Simple apex of Otero & López, 2011 aedeagus (Figs. 5h, 6g, 8h), rounded and without projections. Preputial sac readily vis- Cryptophagus aurelii Otero & López, 2011. The ible, with granular aspect and 2 “caps” well Coleop. Bull., 65 (2): 185 (original spelling marked in apex. Inconspicuous endophallic incorrect) orifice; simple sclerotized rods of same width in all their length, sometimes sinuated and Material examined.5ex,P.N.deCabañeros, sharp in one of the ends (Figs. 5j, 6i, 8j) 6 Ciudad Real, Spain (MNCN, UA, USC) – Rounded sides from lateral tooth to base, or Important characteristics. Pronotum slightly slightly convergent (Fig. 3a,b). Apex of transverse (WL= 1.5) (Fig. 1a,b). Anterior callos- aedeagus (Fig. 3h) rounded externally and ity small (1/5 the length of its side), projecting straight internally. Endophallic orifice slightly from lateral edge, forming an obtuse an- rounded and narrowed in apical zone. Simple gle at a 36.5° angle from body axis. Surface sclerotized rods of same width in all their scarcely visible dorsally, glandular pore present, length, sharp in apex, and sometimes sinuated but not visible from above; lateral tooth in the anddilatedinbase(Fig.3j).Ovalparameres middle of the edge; lateral border concave, from (Fig. 3i) elongated and rounded apically. Base callosity to lateral tooth; sides converging from with lateral nodule. Area of pores with setae lateral tooth to base; basal groove present; well- larger than the area without them. 4 apical defined punctation, punctures separated by a dis- setae 0.75 times longer than paramere. tance shoter than their diameter (Ø= 13–15 µm). Length: 2.0–2.8 mm Aedeagus in Fig. 1h, sclerotized rods in Fig. 1j C. denticulatus Heer, 1841 and parameres in Fig. 1i. 6. Oval parameres (Fig. 8i), rounded in apex. Distribution. Spain (Otero & Lopez 2011). Base with external nodule covered by base of paramere. Area of pores without setae larger 3.2.2. Cryptophagus dentatus (Herbst, 1793) than area with setae. 2 or 3 apical setae, 0.75 times shorter than paramere.
Recommended publications
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • From the Mascarene Islands
    58 New species of Cryptophagidae and Erotylidae (Coleoptera) from the Mascarene Islands New species of Cryptophagidae and Erotylidae (Coleoptera) from the Mascarene Islands GEORGY YU. LYUBARSKY Zoological Museum of Moscow State University, Bolshaya Nikitskaya ulica 6, 125009, Moscow, Russia; e-mail: [email protected] LYUBARSKI G.Yu. 2013. NEW SPECIES OF CRYPTOPHAGIDAE AND EROTYLIDAE (COLEOPTERA) FROM THE MASCARENE ISLANDS. – Latvijas Entomologs 52: 58-67. Abstract: А new species Micrambe reunionensis sp. nov. (Cryptophagidae) is described from the island of La Réunion. Cryptophilus integer (HEER, 1841) and Leucohimatium arundinaceum (FORSKAL, 1775) (Erotylidae) proved new for the Mascarene faunal district. Key words: Cryptophagidae, Erotylidae, Cryptophilus, Leucohimatium, Micrambe, La Réunion, Mascarene Archipelago. Mascarene Islands: natural conditions many recent extinctions. Volcanic islands with higher elevations The Mascarenes is an island group are relatively young. The most /ancient lavas in the south-western Indian Ocean, 700 from La Réunion are dated at 2.1 million km east of Madagascar. Commonly, it is years ago. La Réunion has been suitable subdivided into continental and oceanic for life since about 2–3 million years ago islands, and oceanic islands are further (Thébaud et al. 2009). La Réunion possesses divided into volcanic islands and coral one active and three extinct volcanoes. The islands. The archipelago includes three high island is dissected by huge caldera-like volcanic islands (La Réunion, Mauritius and valleys (cirques) created by heavy rainfall Rodrigues). Mauritius was the former home of erosion, with very deep gorges culminating dodo, the universal symbol of human-caused in narrow outlets to the sea. species extinction on the islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Catalogue of the Cryptophagidae of the Madeira Archipelago and Selvagens Islands 1 (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) TP PT
    Mitt. internat. entomol. Ver. Frankfurt a.M. ISSN 1019-2808 Band 33 . Heft 1/2 Seiten 31 - 43 2. Juni 2008 Systematic Catalogue of the Cryptophagidae of the Madeira Archipelago and Selvagens Islands 1 (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) TP PT Jens ESSER Introduction Since T. V. WOLLASTON 1847 visited for first time the Madeiran archipelago he and other entomologists collected a lot of beetles from there. WOLLASTON published a few longer and shorter papers (WOL- LASTON 1854, 1857, 1864, 1871a, 1871b) about the beetles and described a lot of beetles including a few Cryptophagidae. Later, some other authors collected and published about Cryptophagidae from the Madeiran archipelago. One further species was described by BRUCE (1940), which is no longer a valid species. So, all three endemic species from the archipelago were described by WOLLASTON. For further information about the Atlantics see ASSING & SCHÜLKE (2006). The Cryptophagidae on the Madeiras and Selvagens Today we know 17 species of Cryptophagidae recorded from the Madeiran archipelago and no species from the Selvagens Islands. Three of these species are endemic (18 %), known only from Madeira proper. There is no endemic species known from the other islands. The other 14 species are widespread in Europe or in the Mediterrian Region, the most are widespread in the Palaearctic Region, one species is cosmopolitan. There is no doubt that the most or all of the not-endemic species reached 1 TP PT This contribution is dedicated to Dieter ERBER (1933–2004), who inspirated me to this work. 31 the Madeira archipelago together with human settlement. Only Crypto- phagus laticollis P.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Introduction and Key to Families
    Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2012 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON Vol. IV. Part 1. HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS COLEOPTERA INTRODUCTION AND KEYS TO FAMILIES By R. A. CROWSON LONDON Published by the Society and Sold at its Rooms 41, Queen's Gate, S.W. 7 31st December, 1956 Price-res. c~ . HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS The aim of this series of publications is to provide illustrated keys to the whole of the British Insects (in so far as this is possible), in ten volumes, as follows : I. Part 1. General Introduction. Part 9. Ephemeroptera. , 2. Thysanura. 10. Odonata. , 3. Protura. , 11. Thysanoptera. 4. Collembola. , 12. Neuroptera. , 5. Dermaptera and , 13. Mecoptera. Orthoptera. , 14. Trichoptera. , 6. Plecoptera. , 15. Strepsiptera. , 7. Psocoptera. , 16. Siphonaptera. , 8. Anoplura. 11. Hemiptera. Ill. Lepidoptera. IV. and V. Coleoptera. VI. Hymenoptera : Symphyta and Aculeata. VII. Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea. VIII. Hymenoptera : Cynipoidea, Chalcidoidea, and Serphoidea. IX. Diptera: Nematocera and Brachycera. X. Diptera: Cyclorrhapha. Volumes 11 to X will be divided into parts of convenient size, but it is not possible to specify in advance the taxonomic content of each part. Conciseness and cheapness are main objectives in this new series, and each part will be the work of a specialist, or of a group of specialists.
    [Show full text]
  • Faunistic Notes on Cryptophagidae and Latridiidae of Talassemtane National Park, Western Rif, Morocco, with the Description of a New Species (Coleoptera, Cucujoidea)
    Open Archive TOULOUSE Archive Ouverte (OATAO) OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. This is a publisher-deposited version published in : http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/ Eprints ID : 17784 To link to this article : DOI :10.3897/zookeys.668.11347 URL : http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.668.11347 To cite this version : Otero, José Carlos and Benyahia, Yousra and Brustel, Hervé Faunistic notes on Cryptophagidae and Latridiidae of Talassemtane National Park, Western Rif, Morocco, with the description of a new species (Coleoptera, Cucujoidea). (2017) ZooKeys, vol. 668. pp. 69-82. ISSN 1313-2989 Any correspondance concerning this service should be sent to the repository administrator: [email protected] A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 668:Faunistic 69–82 (2017) notes on Cryptophagidae and Latridiidae of Talassemtane National Park... 69 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.668.11347 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Faunistic notes on Cryptophagidae and Latridiidae of Talassemtane National Park, Western Rif, Morocco, with the description of a new species (Coleoptera, Cucujoidea) José Carlos Otero1, Yousra Benyahia2, Hervé Brustel3 1 Departamento de Zoología y Antropología Física, Facultad de Biología, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain 2 Laboratoire d’Ecologie et Environnement, Faculté des Sciences Ben M’sik, Université Hassan II-Casa- blanca, avenue Cdt Driss El Harti, BP 7955, Sidi Othman-Casablanca, 20000 Casablanca, Morocco 3 Uni- versité de Toulouse, École d’Ingénieurs de Purpan, INPT, UMR Dynafor 1201, 75 voie du TOEC, 31076 Toulouse cedex 3, France Corresponding author: José Carlos Otero ([email protected]) Academic editor: M.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Synanthropic Beetle Faunas Over the Last 9000 Years in the British Isles Smith, David; Hill, Geoff; Kenward, Harry; Allison, Enid
    University of Birmingham Development of synanthropic beetle faunas over the last 9000 years in the British Isles Smith, David; Hill, Geoff; Kenward, Harry; Allison, Enid DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105075 License: Other (please provide link to licence statement Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Smith, D, Hill, G, Kenward, H & Allison, E 2020, 'Development of synanthropic beetle faunas over the last 9000 years in the British Isles', Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 115, 105075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105075 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3/ General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain.
    [Show full text]
  • Examination of Phytosanitary Issues Related to Bark on Wood Packaging Material and ISPM 15 Treatments
    Feb 10, 2006 Examination of Phytosanitary Issues related to Bark on Wood Packaging Material and ISPM 15 Treatments International Forest Quarantine Research Group Meeting Rome, November 29 – December 1, 2005 The following series of questions related to phytosanitary issues of bark of ISPM 15 compliant wood packaging material were answered by the November/December, 2005 meeting of the International Forest Quarantine Research Group. The questions answered were as follows: Q1: What is wood packaging? ................................................................................................... 2 Q2: What pests are associated with untreated wood packaging material and to what level? .... 2 Q3: What is the level of pests following ISPM 15 treatment?................................................... 3 Q3b: What is the incidence of infestation on wood packaging material imported into countries requiring ISPM 15 compliance?................................................................................................. 3 Q4: What is the evidence of infestation of treated wood with bark when compared with treated wood without bark?........................................................................................................ 4 Q5: What are the post-treatment levels of infestation (with and without bark) compared with pre-treatment levels? .................................................................................................................. 4 Q6: Do pests both attack and breed in wood with bark?...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Acla Agrophysica, 2002, 67, 15-23 ZOOGEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS
    Acla Agrophysica, 2002, 67, 15-23 ZOOGEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BYELORUSSIAN POLESYE BEETLE FAUNA (INSECTA, COLEOPTERA) l 2 o.R. Aleksandrowicz , SA Kap/sil/h IDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Universily ofWarmia and Mazuria Żo łnierska str. J4, 10-561 , Olsztyn, Poland, [email protected] 2Maxim Tank Byelorussian Stale Pedagogieal University, Oepartment ofZoology Sovietskaya sIr. 18, 220050 Minsk, Byelonlss ia, sergey _1975 @mail,ru A b s t r a c t. UnIi I the present limes the Byeloru5sian Polesye therc arc 2 J 07 species belonging to 87 families one or which 219 species are can be found only herc. The bectle fauna oflhe Polesie is of a mixed origin, with the predominance ors pecies descending from the Ancient Mediterranean Di strict (65,4 %). The speci es from the East-European Sorcal District are less numerOlI S (33,2 %). The beetle fauna can be llsed to allocatc the Polesie as an independent zoogeographical region ofthe East European Province or the European-Ob $ubarea ar the European-Siberian Area ar the Pa­ laearctic Subkingdom ofthe Holarctic Kingdom . K e y w o r d s: Coleoptera, zoogeography , Byelorussi an Polesye INTRODUCTION The speeies diversity and the num ber of the speeimens made beetles the main group among animals. This group oeeupies all bioeenosis and takes part in the funetioning of water and ground eeosystems. Until the present times in the terri­ tory of the Byelorussian Polesye 2107 speeies belonging to 87 famili es out of whieh 2 19 speeies are found out only are known [I]. MATERlAL AND METHODS This researeh is an investigation of fauna (1975-2000 years), earried out in the territory of Byelorussia and the Bryansk distriet of Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea
    Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e8013 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 Taxonomic Paper Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea Natalie Dale-Skey‡, Richard R. Askew§‡, John S. Noyes , Laurence Livermore‡, Gavin R. Broad | ‡ The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom § private address, France, France | The Natural History Museum, London, London, United Kingdom Corresponding author: Gavin R. Broad ([email protected]) Academic editor: Pavel Stoev Received: 02 Feb 2016 | Accepted: 05 May 2016 | Published: 06 Jun 2016 Citation: Dale-Skey N, Askew R, Noyes J, Livermore L, Broad G (2016) Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea. Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e8013. doi: 10.3897/ BDJ.4.e8013 Abstract Background A revised checklist of the British and Irish Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea substantially updates the previous comprehensive checklist, dating from 1978. Country level data (i.e. occurrence in England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland and the Isle of Man) is reported where known. New information A total of 1754 British and Irish Chalcidoidea species represents a 22% increase on the number of British species known in 1978. Keywords Chalcidoidea, Mymarommatoidea, fauna. © Dale-Skey N et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 2 Dale-Skey N et al. Introduction This paper continues the series of checklists of the Hymenoptera of Britain and Ireland, starting with Broad and Livermore (2014a), Broad and Livermore (2014b) and Liston et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 514.1KB .Pdf File
    Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 56(2):659-666 (1997) 28 February 1997 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1997.56.67 BIODIVERSITY OF NEW ZEALAND BEETLES (INSECTA, COLEOPTERA) J. KLIMASZEWSK.I Manaaki Whenua — Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Present address: BC Research. 3650 Weshrook Mall, Vancouver V6S SLS, Canada Abstract Klimaszewski, J., 1 997. Biodiversity of New Zealand beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera). Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 56(2): 659-666. Approximately 5235 species are described for New Zealand, including 354 introduced. They belong to 82 families in two suborders, Adephaga and Polyphaga. The New Zealand beetle fauna is distinguished by the absence of many major lineages, a high level of endem- ism. which in many groups is over 90% at the specific level and over 43% at the generic level (e.g.. Staphylinidae), and the radiation of many groups of genera and species. The origins of New Zealand's beetle fauna are still poorly understood. They are likely to be varied, includ- ing Gondwanan elements and elements which arrived here by short and long-distance dispersal recently and in the remote past. The size of the New Zealand beetle fauna is con- sistent with species number/land area relationships in other areas around the world. Introduction Zealand beetles is that of Kuschel (1990), in the suburb of Lynfield, Auckland, in which 982 The beetles are the largest order of organisms, beetle species were recorded in a diverse veg- with over 350 000 described species world- etation including remnant forest, pastureland, wide. and suburban garden.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklists of Cucujidae, Laemophloeidae, and Silvanidae (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) from Iran Michael C
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 2016 Checklists of Cucujidae, Laemophloeidae, and Silvanidae (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) from Iran Michael C. Thomas Florida State Collection of Arthropods, [email protected] Hassan Ghahari Islamic Azad University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Thomas, Michael C. and Ghahari, Hassan, "Checklists of Cucujidae, Laemophloeidae, and Silvanidae (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) from Iran" (2016). Insecta Mundi. 1002. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/1002 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0498 Checklists of Cucujidae, Laemophloeidae, and Silvanidae (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) from Iran Michael C. Thomas Florida State Collection of Arthropods Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services P.O. Box 147100 Gainesville, FL 32614-7100 Hassan Ghahari Department of Plant Protection Yadegar - e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch Islamic Azad University Tehran, Iran Date of Issue: August 26, 2016 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL Michael C. Thomas and Hassan Ghahari Checklists of Cucujidae, Laemophloeidae, and Silvanidae (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) from Iran Insecta Mundi 0498: 1-12 ZooBank Registered: LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8F4C729F-E604-4E32-B592-E82C3FE0C00A Published in 2016 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P. O.
    [Show full text]
  • BOLD Taxonid Tree
    BOLD TaxonID Tree Title : Tree Result - Search: Marker(COI-5P); Seq Length(500 bp); Tax(Cryptophagus) (74 records returned) (74 records selected) Date : 23-Jul-2019 Data Type : Nucleotide Distance Model : Kimura 2 Parameter Marker : COI-5P Colourization : [blue]=Stop Codons [red]=Contamination or misidentification Label : Sample ID Label : Process ID Label : Taxon Label : Province/State Label : Sequence Length Label : Barcode Cluster (BIN) Filter : length > 200bp only Filter : exclude records flagged as misidentifications Filter : exclude records with stop codons Filter : exclude contaminants Sequence Count : 74 Species count : 22 Genus count : 1 Family count : 1 Unidentified : 0 BIN Count : 31 Cover Page 1/1 Search: Tue Jul 23 18:10:14 2019 Page 1 of 1 5 % Cryptophagus mainensis|SSBRB2064-14|BIOUG12950-H01|Nova Scotia|658[0n]|BOLD:ACN7941 Cryptophagus mainensis|POSPD1193-15|BIOUG21225-B04|British Columbia|634[2n]|BOLD:ACX9118 Cryptophagus mainensis|SSGLA4759-15|BIOUG24595-E06|British Columbia|657[0n]|BOLD:ACX9118 Cryptophagus varus|SMTPM2660-15|BIOUG22035-H03|British Columbia|645[0n]|BOLD:ACU6317 Cryptophagus quadrihamatus|CNPAI004-13|BIOUG04440-F07|Saskatchewan|658[0n]|BOLD:ACD9453 Cryptophagus quadrihamatus|CNKLA472-14|BIOUG17219-C07|Yukon Territory|658[0n]|BOLD:ACD9453 Cryptophagus quadrihamatus|SMTPS409-16|BIOUG31106-F11|Newfoundland and Labrador|631[0n]|BOLD:A... Cryptophagus lapponicus|INRMA2525-15|CCDB-28920-G05|British Columbia|550[89n]|BOLD:ACM3695 Cryptophagus lapponicus|UAMU938-14|UAM:Ento:245350|Alaska|658[0n]|BOLD:ACM3695
    [Show full text]