DOCSLIB.ORG

Imagereal Capture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Imagereal Capture QUEENSLAND JUDGES ON THE HIGH COURT? Is there something different about Queensland? Is it more than a State but a condition? It remains, according to Bolton and Waterson, a 'long and profitless debate amongst historians whether Queensland is different'.' Certainly visitors have remarked, even before federation, that Queensland was different from the rest of Australia. As the poisoned pen of Beatrice Webb noted in 1898, as the federation movement was in full flight, '[iln short, in Queensland one finds at every turn, a most peculiar reminiscence of the bad manners, sullen insolence, and graspingness of the "man in possession"'.2 Sidney Webb was less scathing than his acerbic wife, but interestingly declared that 'the politicians and the newspapers are in fact, the best product of ~ustralia'.~ Notwithstanding Bolton and Waterson's warning of a 'long and profitless debate' it is worth considering whether Queensland's legal history deserves closer attention in contrast to the rest of the country.4 The publication of Queensland Judges on the High Court provides a vehicle to consider this and many other questions. It is well known that Queensland played a reluctant part in the deliberation of the Commonwealth Constitution. After a promising start at the 1891 Convention Queensland's formal involvement was not until the second referendum in 1899. The bulk of the drafting and politiclung of the 1897 and 1898 Convention had to take place in Queensland's absence. Even after its decision to join the federal movement, its delegate to London, James Dickson, was the first to jump ship under pressure from the imperious Joseph Chamberlain and colonial interests at home. Notwithstanding, or perhaps because of, its internal politics and reluctance, Queensland shares with Western Australia a unique express constitutional footprint. For Queensland it is the regionalism that dominated federation politics that is captured in s 7 of the Constitution relating to the Senate. For Western * Reader, Faculty of Law, Australian National University. 'Michael White and Aladin Rahemtula (eds), Queensland Judges on the High Court, Supreme Court of Queensland Library (2003). Geoffrey Bolton and Duncan Waterson, 'Queensland' in Helen Irving, The Centenary Companion to Australian Federation (1999) 93,94. A. G. Austin (ed), The Webbs' Australian Diary (1965) 40. Ibid 1 15 (emphasis in original). Paul Finn, Laus and Government in Colonial Australia (1987) ch 5. John La Nauze, The Making of the Australian Constitution (1974) 262. 528 Book Reviews Australia it is the absence in the preamble and the long since spent provision dealing with its financial arrangement.6 The book, edited by Michael White and Aladin Rahemtula, has eight chapters with commentaries on the contribution of the five Queensland judges; Sir Samuel Griffith, Sir Harry Gibbs, Sir Gerard Brennan, Sir William Webb and Sir Charles Powers. Spared from this scrutiny in this volume is Justice Ian Callinan who provides an overview. What then is to be made of the disproportionate contribution that Queensland has made to the Australian High Court? For instance of the 11 Chief Justices of the High Court, Queensland has provided three. On this note it is worthy that the first chapter of the work is provided by a South Australian. The title of the collection could have been extended to be Queensland and South Australian Judges on the High Court without the need to print an extra page. Justice Selway in his contribution puts forward a more general treatise on constitutional interpretation. His overarching theme is the need to see constitutional interpretation against fundamental assumptions. The first of these assumptions was the imperial underpinnings of the Constitution. As is known the strength of this imperial connection was to give way to species of legal nationalism. This movement, according to Justice Selway, provides a second contradictory assumption that arises from Australian independence. Against these two competing norms Justice Selway has attempted to create a matrix of the approaches to constitutional interpretation from within the current High Court. In essence, Justice Selway concludes that only Justices McHugh and Kirby have declared themselves as having an avowed interpretative position. He has styled the other members of the Court as the 'flexible five'.7 This group will use history, practicality, convenience and even purpose as a method of interpretation when the constitutional adjudication requires it. What is critical in Justice Selway's discussion is his appreciation that the justification for their approach is external to the Constitution it~elf.~This analysis is consistent with the work of Cass Sunstein who has advanced the view that: any approach to interpretation requires a justification of some kind. That justification must be independent of any texts that are being interpreted. Any understanding of "meaning" of texts depends on judgments and commitments that are independent of the texts themsel~es.~ Justice Selway's chapter concludes that public confidence is best maintained by a return to legalism (though not strict legalism). This conclusion may appear to Commonwealth Constitution s 95. Less obvious are ss 41 and 128 that reflect the state of the franchise in South Australia and Western Australia in 1900. White and Rahemtula (eds), above n t, 15. Ibid 19. Cass Sunstein, Legal Reasoning and Political Conzt (1 996) 170; cf George Winterton, 'Extra-Constitutional Notions in Australian Constitutional Law' (1986) 16 Federal Law Review 223. (2004) 23 The University of Queensland Law Journal 529 be paradoxical. Indeed, one of the justifications for departing from legalism is an adoption of a realist approach to interpretation.'' Such an approach is said to be open and transparent of the choices the judges make, leading to a greater public confidence in the craft. Sir Harry Gibbs in his chapter assesses the judicial career of Sir Samuel Griffith. The chapter is comprehensive in its coverage dealing with the diverse areas of law that came before the High Court. Particular emphasis is placed on the relationship between the High Court and Privy Council. Gibbs notes that 'Griffith was resolute in resisting any encroachment on the jurisdiction or power of the Court, whether from above or below'." Overlooked in this assessment of Griffith was the fact that he, with Sir Samuel Way of the South Australian Supreme Court, was a proponent of the maintenance of the Privy Council in 1900.12 Indeed, Griffith's appointment to the High Court - based on the Privy Council issue and others - was denounced by Senator Keating in 1903. Griffith's actions had, according to Keating, 'disentitled him fiom ever occupying a seat on the ~ench'.'~ Gibbs also endorses the approach that Griffith had to Australian federalism. He argued that 'the mode of interpretation required by the Engineers' Case has resulted in Commonwealth powers being given an effect which virtually obliterates State power.'14 This assessment hints at what might be a theme in Queensland members of the High Court. The point is taken up in greater detail in Nicholas Aroney's chapter on 'The Griffith Doctrine'. For Aroney the contrast between Griffith and Sir Isaac Isaacs is understood in terms of theories of federalism. For a nationalist, like Isaacs, the attraction was towards John Austin. This is in contrast to federalists such as Griffith who viewed the Commonwealth as being founded on limited competencies. Such a view was supported by James ~ryce.'~Ultimately, Aroney concludes that Griffith's approach to the Constitution was influenced by both theories. He concludes, after a penetrating analysis of the earlier case law, that few remnants of Griffith's approach are found in current jurisprudence; though he does suggest that the High Court may need to revisit some of Griffith's views in light of its recent decisions in the area of intergovernmental immunities. Patrick Keane, in his commentary on Gibbs's paper on Griffith, continues the theme of the state of the immunities doctrine. Highlighting, with some relish, the inconsistency and vagaries of the Isaac approach in Engineers ' casel6 and Pirrie v ~c~arlane'~Keane provides a contemporary context as he reflects on the lo Sir Anthony Mason, 'The Role of the Courts at the Turn of the Century' (1993) 3 Journal of Judicial Administration 156, 164. 'I White and Rahemtula (eds), above n f,23. l2 La Nauze, above n 5,262-8. l3 Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 23 September 1903,5372. l4 White and Rahemtula (eds), above n f,25. IS Ibid 227-8. l6 Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (1920)28 CLR 129 ('Engineers ' Case 3. l7 (1925) 36 CLR 170. 530 Book Reviews current state of the doctrine and its application to Australian federalism. He argues that from Melbourne Corporation easel8 to Austin v ~ommonwealth~~ 'the Court has expended a great deal of effort and ink in the pursuit of the notions of "discrimination" and "particular burden or di~ability"'.~'The result has been 'fruitless'. Gibbs is both an author and a subject of this work. The substantive paper is the work of Justice Williams with the commentary fkom David Jackson. Both were associates of Gibbs. As Justice Williams notes, it is a 'daunting task' for an associate to make an assessment of the c~ntribution.~'Justice Williams has undertaken a wide assessment of the work of Sir Harry highlighting not only the constitutional jurisprudence but also criminal, equity, contract and torts. In terms of constitutional interpretation Gibbs found himself on a Court in transition - a point hinted at by Justice Williams in his chapter.22As noted above Gibbs was a federalist at a time when the Commonwealth was in the ascendency. As such Gibbs was in dissent in some significant constitutional cases. He also found himself at the centre of the controversial Lionel Murphy period as Chief Justice; a position that Justice Williams suggests Gibbs had the 'misfortune' to hold.23 For his part David Jackson highlights a number of issues related to Sir Harry such as his decision to resign from the Supreme Court of Queensland to accept an appointment on the Federal Court of Bankruptcy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Executive Power Ofthe Commonwealth: Its Scope and Limits
    DEPARTMENT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY Parliamentary Research Service The Executive Power ofthe Commonwealth: its scope and limits Research Paper No. 28 1995-96 ~ J. :tJ. /"7-t ., ..... ;'. --rr:-~l. fii _ -!":u... .. ..r:-::-:_-J-:---~~~-:' :-]~llii iiim;r~.? -:;qI~Z'~i1:'l ISBN 1321-1579 © Copyright Commonwealth ofAustralia 1996 Except to the extent of the uses pennitted under the Copyright Act J968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any fonn or by any means including infonnation storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members ofthe Australian Parliament in the course oftheir official duties. This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members ofthe Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using infonnation publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Parliamentary Research Service (PRS). Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. PRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members ofthe public. Published by the Department ofthe Parliamentary Library, 1996 Parliamentary Research Service The Executive Power ofthe Commonwealth: its scope and limits Dr Max Spry Law and Public Administration Group 20 May 1996 Research Paper No. 28 1995-96 Acknowledgments This is to acknowledge the help given by Bob Bennett, the Director of the Law and Public Administration Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal of Study
    THE TRIAL WITHIN: NEGOTIATING JUSTICE AT THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL FOR THE FAR EAST, 1946-1948 by JAMES BURNHAM SEDGWICK B.A. (Honours), Acadia University, 2002 M.A., The University of Canterbury, 2004 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) July 2012 © James Burnham Sedgwick, 2012 Abstract This dissertation explores the inner-workings of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE). Commonly known as the Tokyo trial, Tokyo tribunal, or Tokyo IMT, the IMTFE brought Japan’s wartime leadership to justice for aggression, crimes against humanity, and war crimes committed during World War II. Using rare sources in three languages from public and private collections in eight countries, this dissertation presents a multi-perspective experiential history of the IMTFE in operation. By placing the court in a distinct international moment that produced the United Nations, the Nuremberg trial, the Genocide Convention, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, among other outgrowths of global community, this work explores the IMTFE as both a groundbreaking judicial undertaking and a pioneering multilateral institution. Other scholars use overly reductive and judgmental constructs based on outside-looking-in perspectives to assess the court’s legal or moral legitimacy without appreciating or detailing its nuance and complexity. This dissertation prefers an inside-out view to explain the trial, not judge it. It describes the IMTFE as a collective endeavour and experience behind the scenes. Chapters review the personal, emotional, administrative, logistical, legal, political, and global dimensions of internationalism in action.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of the Federal Political Career of Andrew Fisher
    SOME ASPECTS OF THE FEDERAL POLITICAL CAREER OF ANDREW FISHER By EDWARD WIL.LIAM I-IUMPHREYS, B.A. Hans. MASTER OF ARTS Department of History I Faculty of Arts, The University of Melbourne Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degr'ee of Masters of Arts (by Thesis only) JulV 2005 ABSTRACT Andrew Fisher was prime minister of Australia three times. During his second ministry (1910-1913) he headed a government that was, until the 1940s, Australia's most reformist government. Fisher's second government controlled both Houses; it was the first effective Labor administration in the history of the Commonwealth. In the three years, 113 Acts were placed on the statute books changing the future pattern of the Commonwealth. Despite the volume of legislation and changes in the political life of Australia during his ministry, there is no definitive full-scale biographical published work on Andrew Fisher. There are only limited articles upon his federal political career. Until the 1960s most historians considered Fisher a bit-player, a second ranker whose main quality was his moderating influence upon the Caucus and Labor ministry. Few historians have discussed Fisher's role in the Dreadnought scare of 1909, nor the background to his attempts to change the Constitution in order to correct the considered deficiencies in the original drafting. This thesis will attempt to redress these omissions from historical scholarship Firstly, it investigates Fisher's reaction to the Dreadnought scare in 1909 and the reasons for his refusal to agree to the financing of the Australian navy by overseas borrowing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Law, Contemporary Values and Sophocles' Antigone
    The common law, contemporary values and Sophocles' Antigone Robert French Oration Hellenic Australian Lawyers' Association (WA Chapter) The Honourable Justice Peter Quinlan Chief Justice of Western Australia 31 October 2019 2 It is a great honour to be asked to deliver this year's Robert French Oration to the WA Chapter of the Hellenic Australian Lawyers Association. May I begin by acknowledging the Whadjuk people of the Noongyar nation, the traditional owners of the land on which we gather tonight, and pay my respects to their Elders past, present and emerging. The importance of such an acknowledgement at the commencement of the Robert French Oration will be obvious to anyone with even a passing knowledge of the contribution made by the Hon Robert French AC to the law in Australia over a legal and judicial career spanning almost 50 years. As the twelfth Chief Justice of Australia, Robert French was the first Western Australian to hold that office, the highest judicial office in this country. It is fitting, then, that the Robert French Oration should be hosted by the Western Australian branch of the Hellenic Australian Lawyers Association. Any attempt to summarise or encapsulate a career as diverse, and a contribution as significant, as that of Robert French to the law and the administration of justice would, of course, fall well short of the mark. I do not propose to make such an attempt this evening. It will, I hope, suffice for me to acknowledge Robert French's conspicuous service to the people of Australia over so many decades, including over 30 years as a judge.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealanders and the International Military Tribunal for the Far East
    New Zealanders and the International Military Tribunal for the Far East THE RECENT DEATH of Japanese Emperor Hirohito has sparked renewed controversy as to whether or not he should have been tried as a war criminal. The comments of those New Zealanders who have offered easy and frequently grotesque solutions to this question have mostly shown complete ignorance of the legal problems surrounding the war crimes trials which were held after the Second World War, and particular ignorance of the major trial held in Tokyo from 1946 to 1948. This ignorance is by no means unique. Some years ago an American scholar writing about the Tokyo war crimes trial began his book with the sentence, 'Few Americans know much about the Tokyo trial',1 while a more recent writer on the subject claimed that the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE) had 'simply been swallowed up by the biggest black hole of the twentieth century'.2 There are a number of reasons for ignorance about the trial. One of them is the intimidating quantity of the material relating to it. The University of Canterbury holds one of the few complete collections of the transcript in the world. It consists of380 volumes of, it is claimed, at least 10 million words. The majority judgment alone runs into 1200 pages.3 Moreover, apart from Premier Tojo, the names of those who were tried are now, and were then, largely unfamiliar in the West, which predictably has taken little interest in the fate of these unknowns. As the one Japanese wartime figure that many non-Japanese knew of, it is not perhaps surprising that the Emperor should have become a focus of bitterness immediately after the war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Expediency Queensland
    THE POLITICS OF EXPEDIENCY QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT IN THE EIGHTEEN-NINETIES by Jacqueline Mc0ormack University of Queensland, 197^1. Presented In fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts to the Department of History, University of Queensland. TABLE OP, CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION SECTION ONE; THE SUBSTANCE OP POLITICS CHAPTER 1. The Men of Politics 1 CHAPTER 2. Politics in the Eighties 21 CHAPTER 3. The Depression 62 CHAPTER 4. Railways 86 CHAPTER 5. Land, Labour & Immigration 102 CHAPTER 6 Separation and Federation 132 CHAPTER 7 The Queensland.National Bank 163 SECTION TWO: THE POLITICS OP REALIGNMENT CHAPTER 8. The General Election of 1888 182 CHAPTER 9. The Coalition of 1890 204 CHAPTER 10. Party Organization 224 CHAPTER 11. The Retreat of Liberalism 239 CHAPTER 12. The 1893 Election 263 SECTION THREE: THE POLITICS.OF EXPEDIENCY CHAPTER 13. The First Nelson Government 283 CHAPTER Ik. The General Election of I896 310 CHAPTER 15. For Want of an Opposition 350 CHAPTER 16. The 1899 Election 350 CHAPTER 17. The Morgan-Browne Coalition 362 CONCLUSION 389 APPENDICES 394 BIBLIOGRAPHY 422 PREFACE The "Nifi^ties" Ms always" exercised a fascination for Australian historians. The decade saw a flowering of Australian literature. It saw tremendous social and economic changes. Partly as a result of these changes, these years saw the rise of a new force in Australian politics - the labour movement. In some colonies, this development was overshadowed by the consolidation of a colonial liberal tradition reaching its culmination in the Deakinite liberalism of the early years of the tlommdhwealth. Developments in Queensland differed from those in the southern colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pacific War Crimes Trials: the Importance of the "Small Fry" Vs. the "Big Fish"
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Theses & Dissertations History Summer 2012 The aP cific aW r Crimes Trials: The mpI ortance of the "Small Fry" vs. the "Big Fish" Lisa Kelly Pennington Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds Part of the Asian History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Pennington, Lisa K.. "The aP cific aW r Crimes Trials: The mporI tance of the "Small Fry" vs. the "Big Fish"" (2012). Master of Arts (MA), thesis, History, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/rree-9829 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds/11 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PACIFIC WAR CRIMES TRIALS: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE "SMALL FRY" VS. THE "BIG FISH by Lisa Kelly Pennington B.A. May 2005, Old Dominion University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HISTORY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2012 Approved by: Maura Hametz (Director) Timothy Orr (Member) UMI Number: 1520410 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Brisbane Grammar School Magasine
    Vol. XV. APRIL, 1918. No. 45. BRI S HANEN Ej GRAMMAR SCHOOL MAGAZIN E. 9.I 4 ritbanr : i: OI-TKI;I.;- I'RIN'ING CO., LTD.-98 Ul'K*'-N 8TREKT 1913. |i III I . ,II, I I I TheSel-tilling Outridge 5/- A Genuine I Fountain Pen. Time Save I__ Simle yrtagel Actieon, Actual alegth It inches. 14ct. Gold Nib. Masutactured Ipecially for Outridge Printing Co. Ltd. SPECIAL OFFER t IPrea Trial and Guarastee. 9le Sket Time O ly. This Pen will be lent you P etagel Paid on receipt of Postal Note for 5f- (Stamps winl be accepted if more convlient). You will be Pleased with the pen but we guarantee to send your Mosey back If you are not ktidiedt , rovided you return it within 7 days. ow to r -Just cut out this order, sign it, sad y r rees, sad send it to us with postal order. The Pen will be in your hands by the next mail; but you must Orier Neow as this offer will only lst a few days. Outridge Printing Com pany Ltd @S9 Qqe 8teeIt. ',Iebae.. U - Brisbane Grammar School Magasine. 8 Sehool Institutions. School Committee. SPORTS' MASTER ... ... ... MR. S. STEPHENSON HON. TREASURER ...... ... MR. R. E. HIIWAITES CRICKET CAPTAIN ... ... ... M. D. GRAHAM COMMITTEE ... Mi. W. R. IOWMAN, A. F. PA'TON, R C. TROUT, G. C. C. WII.so DEI.EGATE TO Q.L.T.A. ... ... MR. H. PORTEnR OTHER CAPTAINS 2nd W1RENCH ; 3rd BARN:S, C. G ; 4 th FRASER, K. B.; 5 th BRADFIEI.D, C. A.; 6th KIl ROE Librarians.-N.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Law Conference
    >'-1 ·~·1;': ...::.,1·.. ', .. 't··'··lj.·' ! i ·'.c<'""r;,., ...•-F"I"R:=.s-'-'r--""=~===""""''''''=''''-====~'- ':':C-~-~;~E:~~RA; . :A-;:-~-i'?~:t9 a~ II I. I I I : I I I i I , ; ,~ > • FIRST CANADA-AUSTRALASIAN LAW CONFERENCE CANBERRA APRIL 1988 f I It is timely to note an important law conference which took place in Canberra, Australia in April 1988. The First Canada-Australasia Law Conference was held at the Australian National University in that city. organised by the Canadian , Institute for Advanced Legal Studies, the convenors of the conference were Chief Justice Nathan Nemetz of British Columbia and Justice Michael Kirby, President of the New South Wales I The conference attracted a number of leading Court of Appeal. 1 judges and practitioners from Canada, Australia, New Zealand I and the Pacific region. It was opened on 5 April 1988 by the Governor General of Australia (Sir Ninian Stephen). During the 1 conference, the Governor General hosted a dinner at Government House, Canberra, which was attended uniquely by all of the Chief Justices of Australia, who were meeting in Canberra at I the same time, all of the Chief Justices of the Superior Courtscourts f of Canada (except for the supreme court of ontario), the Chief Justices of New Zealand and Singapore and other distinguished guests. I In his opening remarks to the conference, the Chief f Justice of Canada (the Rt Han RGR G Brian Dickson PC) spoke of the need to further the links between Australian and Canadian - 1 - \ I jurisprudence. The same theme was echoed by the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia (Sir Anthony Mason).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15 the Return of the Repressed
    Chapter 15 The Return of the Repressed XTINCTION in philosophy is not forever. Any opinion or argument, no matter how finally it seems to have been hunted Edown and refuted into oblivion, has the chance of being redis- covered by a new generation eager for novelties. In this chapter, we examine the revival of two old philosophies once thought well off the agenda: idealism and Catholic natural law philosophy. They have not been seen much in philosophy departments, but have flourished in, respectively, literature departments and the High Court of Australia. As we saw in chapter 6, David Stove wrote that idealism, the doc- trine that everything is mind-dependent, was sustained by what he identified as the ‘Worst argument in the world’: We can know things only as they are related to us/under our forms of perception and un- derstanding/in so far as they fall under our conceptual schemes, etc, so, we cannot know things as they are in themselves. In Berkeley’s version, ‘we cannot have trees-outside-the-mind in mind without them being in mind, so there cannot be trees outside the mind (or if there could be, they could not be thought of). That argument did not vanish with the 1890s. We saw in chapter 11 that John Burnheim adopted an ‘inevitably partisan’ reading of the Sydney disturbances on the grounds that philosophy ‘rests not on ultimate truths, but on a reading of our specific historical situation’ (that is, we cannot know things except through our specific historical situation, therefore we cannot know things as they are in themselves).
    [Show full text]
  • Seeing Visions and Dreaming Dreams Judicial Conference of Australia
    Seeing Visions and Dreaming Dreams Judicial Conference of Australia Colloquium Chief Justice Robert French AC 7 October 2016, Canberra Thank you for inviting me to deliver the opening address at this Colloquium. It is the first and last time I will do so as Chief Justice. The soft pink tones of the constitutional sunset are deepening and the dusk of impending judicial irrelevance is advancing upon me. In a few weeks' time, on 25 November, it will have been thirty years to the day since I was commissioned as a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia. The great Australian legal figures who sat on the Bench at my official welcome on 10 December 1986 have all gone from our midst — Sir Ronald Wilson, John Toohey, Sir Nigel Bowen and Sir Francis Burt. Two of my articled clerks from the 1970s are now on the Supreme Court of Western Australia. One of them has recently been appointed President of the Court of Appeal. They say you know you are getting old when policemen start looking young — a fortiori when the President of a Court of Appeal looks to you as though he has just emerged from Law School. The same trick of perspective leads me to see the Judicial Conference of Australia ('JCA') as a relatively recent innovation. Six years into my judicial career, in 1992, I attended a Supreme and Federal Courts Judges' Conference at which Justices Richard McGarvie and Ian Sheppard were talking about the establishment of a body to represent the common interests and concerns of judges, to defend the judiciary as an institution and, where appropriate, to defend individual judges who were the target of unfair and unwarranted criticisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Former CJ Spigelman Appointed to HK Court of Final Appeal FINAL
    Issued 9 April 2013 Former NSW Chief Justice appointed to Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Former NSW Chief Justice James Spigelman has been appointed to the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal. The appointment was announced yesterday in Hong Kong, jointly by the court’s Chief Justice, Mr Geoffrey Ma Tao-li, and the Chief Executive of Hong Kong, Mr C Y Leung. The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal is the highest appellate court in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Established in 1997, it has the power of final adjudication with respect to the civil and criminal laws of Hong Kong. It comprises permanent Hong Kong judges, non-permanent Hong Kong judges and non- permanent common law judges from other jurisdictions. The Honourable Mr Justice Spigelman has been appointed a non-permanent judge from another common law jurisdiction. He will sit on appeals for a period of time each 12 to 18 months. He joins other distinguished Australian jurists previously appointed including three former Chief Justices of Australia, Sir Anthony Mason, Sir Gerard Brennan and Murray Gleeson, and, also announced yesterday, Justice William Gummow. The Honourable Mr Justice Spigelman was appointed NSW Chief Justice in May 1998 and served until May 2011. He is currently Chair of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (since April 2012). NSW Chief Justice Tom Bathurst congratulated his predecessor on this most recent appointment. "In addition to his significant contribution to the law in this state and country, Mr Spigelman was responsible for engaging with our legal colleagues throughout the Asian region in a way that had never been done before," Chief Justice Bathurst said.
    [Show full text]