DOCSLIB.ORG

Gorge of Kresna - Corridor No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Strasbourg, 3 September 2002 T-PVS/Files (2002) 7 [tpvs2002\file07e_2002] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee 22nd meeting Strasbourg, 2-5 December 2002 Specific File Construction of a Motorway in the Gorge of Kresna - Corridor No. 4 of transport: EU PHARE Project – Connection Bulgaria - Greece (Motorway E79 : Sofia-Kulata) Report of the on-the-spot appraisal (30 May – 1st June 2002) by Mr Guy Berthoud, ECONAT SA, Yverdon-Les-Bains, Sitzerland (e-mail : [email protected]) Secretariat Memorandum Prepared by The Directorate of Culture and Cultural and Natural Heritage This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS/Files (2002) 7 - 2 - CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................3 1.1. Justification of the expertise .................................................................................................3 1.2. Course of the expertise .........................................................................................................4 2. ANALYSE REGIONAL CONTEXT ........................................................................................ 5 2.1. Geographical characteristics of the site .................................................................................5 3. KNOWLEDGE OF THE EXISTING SITUATION...................................................................... 7 3.1. Zone conserned with the project ...........................................................................................7 3.2. Geomorphologic situation ....................................................................................................7 3.3. Vegetation............................................................................................................................8 3.4. Fauna .................................................................................................................................10 3.5. Infrastructures of transport..................................................................................................11 3.6. Villages and isolated dwellings...........................................................................................12 3.7. Transformation of the landscape .........................................................................................12 3.8. Remarkable protected sites .................................................................................................12 3.9. Ecological network in the landscape ...................................................................................13 4. PROBLEMS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF A ROAD WITH STRONG TRAFFIC IN THE GORGE . 15 4.1. Influences...........................................................................................................................15 4.2. Distrubances.......................................................................................................................16 4.3. Preliminary EIA report in the step of selection of the alternatives .......................................17 4.4. Search for alternatives paths ...............................................................................................19 4.5. Choice of a preferential path...............................................................................................20 4.6. Claims of the ONG’s..........................................................................................................24 4.7. Step of consultation and participation .................................................................................24 4.8. Assessment of the current situation.....................................................................................25 5. SEARCH FOR SOLUTIONS................................................................................................ 25 5.1. Integrating the natural constraints .......................................................................................25 5.2. Measures of compensation..................................................................................................26 5.3. Study of alternative paths ...................................................................................................26 5.4. The environmental assessment of the “CORINE-Biotope” site............................................26 5.5. Environmental evaluation...................................................................................................27 5.6. The plan of environmental measures of the motorway project (PEM)..................................27 6. CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................ 27 APPENDIX: DRAFT RECOMMENDATION TO THE STANDING COMMITTEE.......................... 29 - 3 - T-PVS/Files (2002) 7 Expertise concerning the Construction of a Motorway in the Gorge of Kresna Corridor No. 4 of transport: Connection Bulgaria - Greece – 1. Introduction 1.1 Justification of the expertise In September 2001, the Standing Committee of the Convention of Bern was seized by a complaint deposited by a group of ONGs Bulgarian relating to the construction of a motorway through a site of the Network EMERALD, the Gorge of Kresna (Bulgaria), which is likely to be affected by the project in a prejudicial way. Rather than opening a file of procedure for complaint against the government, the committee considered it preferable to answer the proposal of the Bulgarian authorities to organize a visit on the spot and to try a conciliation between the parts. This expert report makes the synthesis of the information collected at the time of this visit and present of the solutions to try to solve the problem. Summary of the situation · In 1997 the investigations for the construction of a motorway in the south of Western Bulgaria begins. It is about the corridor n°4 of transport. The initial path entirely crosses the Gorge of Kresna - sector of exceptional natural value known as a future site selected by the " CORINE- BIOTOPE/NATURA 2000 " program. · During the period 1998-1999, the General Administration of Roads (GRA) prepares several reports/ratios of environmental impact studies (EIA) for the project of motorway, which will be successively rejected by the Ministry of the Environment and Waters (MIAULER). · Between 1999 and the 2001 the Ministry of Environment requests the Ministry for Regional Development and General Administration of Roads to provide several proposal for the realization of realistic alternative routes apart from the gorge. · The conceptual study of the motorway is registered in the financial memoranda 98 and 99 of the program PHARE of the EU. · In April a 2000 contract is signed with Italian company SPEA Ingenerie Europea to carry out the feasibility study of the project. · The pilot project of application of the Network EMERALD in Bulgaria, proposes 7 priority sites of "CORINE-BIOTOPE" zones of special interest for conservation (ZISC) potential. The gorge of Kresna is not included in these seven sites but is registered as a potential "CORINE-BIOTOPE" site. · In November the 2000 outline of EIA report prepared by SPEA is rejected by the Ministry of the Environment and Waters because of significant omissions. · Until May 2001 the evaluation of alternative paths avoiding the gorge is not part of the mandate of the SPEA. · In November 2001, the contractors devoted a few days to the study of solutions of replacement. A documentation of 3 maps and 4 pages of text is prepared by the SPEA. T-PVS/Files (2002) 7 - 4 - · In October 2001 the ONGs1 submit a proposal for the designation of the gorge of Kresna as a protected area in conformity with the concept of designation of a protected sector around the gorge, prepared by the Ministery of the Environment in spring 2001. · In December 2001 an EIA report of the project is deposited with the MIAULER. The ministry immediately files proceedings also the procedure of classification of the protected site is not finished. · The public consultation, included in the procedure of EIA, is carried out between March the 3 and 5 2002 with a preliminary distribution of documentation considered to be insufficient and with a weak participation of the local communities that did not allow any feedback about the project. · The complaint of the ONGs in September 2001, arguing the non respect of the Convention of Bern, follows several requests of collaboration with the Ministry for transport. It asks for an expertise from the Standing Committee of the Commission of Bern in Strasbourg. · A three day visit of the site is organized by the Bulgarian Ministry of Environment between May 30 and June 1 2002 to present the problems to the secretariat of the Commission and to his experts. 1.2 Course of the expertise The expertise consisted of several stages. · Presentation of the technical project by the company SPEA Ingeneria Europea, including: - The process of the study aiming from the beginning to an improvement of the existing road. - The search for alternatives allowing to better satisfy the requirements of a motorway and to avoid the probable impacts on the protected site (basic project + 4 alternatives). - Argumentation aiming at the selection of an acceptable alternative. - Stages of presentation of the project to the village authorities and the ONGs. The SPEA placed
Recommended publications
  • Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Some Bulgarian in This Study Many Longhorn Beetles Were Collected from Different Mountains in Bulgaria

    Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Some Bulgarian in This Study Many Longhorn Beetles Were Collected from Different Mountains in Bulgaria

    ACTA ZOOLOGICA BULGARICA In the Result section, only original materials are presented. Known localities of the Acta zool. bulg., 57 (2), 2005: 131-138 most local and rare longhorn beetles are pointed by literature data in the Discussion section. Biological material is kept in the entomological collection of the Forest Research Institute in Sofia. New and Interesting Records of Longhorn Beetles Results (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Some Bulgarian In this study many longhorn beetles were collected from different mountains in Bulgaria. Among them, the following twenty-eight records from four subfamilies were the most Mountains interesting: Lepturinae Georgi Georgiev1, Nikolai Simov2, Anelia Stojanova3, Danail Doychev4 Anastrangalia sanguinolenta (L INNAEUS, 1761) Abstract: Longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Bulgarian Mountains were stud- Material examined: 1 ex., Pirin Mts., Orelyak Reserve above the Breznitsa vill., ied during the period 2000-2004. As a result, many species were collected, twenty-eight 1300 m, 19.08.2004. records of which belonging to 24 genera and 4 subfamilies (Lepturinae, Spondylidinae, Anoplodera rufipes (SCHALLER, 1783) Cerambycinae, and Lamiinae) are most interesting. Twenty-three cerambycids are new Material examined: 1 ex., Lyulin Mts., opposite to the Vladaya vill., 800 m, records for the Strandzha Mts., the Vitosha Mts., the Pirin Mts., the Lyulin Mts., the Sakar 26.05.2004. Mts., the Slavianka Mts., the Rila Mts., and the Balkan Range. Eleven longhorn beetles are Leptura quadrifasciata L , 1758 local and very rare in Bulgaria. Nine species were reared from host plants. INNAEUS Material examined: 1 ex., Strandzha Mts., Arapya horn near Tsarevo, 80 m, Key words: Cerambycidae, new localities, rare species, host plants, Bulgaria 24.06.2003.
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR

    Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR

    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
  • 1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria

    1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria

    I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo
  • Kresna Gorge and Struma Motorway Lot 3.2 (Bulgaria)

    Kresna Gorge and Struma Motorway Lot 3.2 (Bulgaria)

    Kresna Gorge and Struma Motorway Lot 3.2 (Bulgaria) Malina Kroumova Representative of the Bulgarian Government 38th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Bern Convention November 2018 Struma Motorway . The busiest international road going through Bulgaria in the North-South direction . Part of the core TEN-T network, Orient-East/Med corridor . Located in Southwestern Bulgaria (150 km long) . Top priority infrastructure project for the EU . Site of national importance 2 Kresna Gorge - Issues . Serious and frequent accidents along the existing road . Mortality of wild animals on the road, fragmentation of habitats . Travel time, comfort and reliability of road users . Safety of the population and environmental issues in Kresna Town 3 EIA/AA Decision . Five alternatives were equally and thoroughly assessed . Only Long Tunnel Alternative and Eastern Alternative G10.50 were found to be compatible with the conservation objectives of both protected areas . Eastern Alternative G10.50 has clear advantage over 8 environmental components and factors of human health . The Minister of Environment and Water issued EIA Decision No 3-3/2017 approving Eastern Alternative G10.50 . Mandatory conditions and measures for implementation at all stages of the realization of G10.50 4 EIA/AA Decision - Mitigation Measures . Assessed in the EIA/AA . Fencing and passage facilities – technically feasible . Elimination of the risk of mortality and reduction of the barrier effect . Monitoring of the population (4 of the potentially most affected species) 5 Alternatives addressed in the NGOs’ report . Eastern Alternative G20 . Full Tunnel Alternative . Eastern Bypass (the so called “Votan Project”) . Eastern Tunnel Alternative (combination of Lot 3.2 with the existing railway line) 6 Eastern Alternative G20 .
  • How Does the Council View the Discrepancy Which Exists Between the Rigorous Application of the Need to Respect Certain Fundament

    How Does the Council View the Discrepancy Which Exists Between the Rigorous Application of the Need to Respect Certain Fundament

    C 174 E/20 Official Journal of the European Communities EN 19.6.2001 How does the Council view the discrepancy which exists between the rigorous application of the need to respect certain fundamental rights in the applicant countries, and the blatant failure to observe such rights in certain Member States such as France and Greece? Does the Council intend to mandate Mr Max Van der Stoel to draw up a report reviewing and assessing respect for minorities inside the European Union? Reply (8 March 2001) The Council can only endorse the Honourable Member’s analysis of the attitude to be taken in regard to the applicant countries concerning certain fundamental principles and values which are at the basis of the Union’s very existence. Compliance with the political criteria laid down by the Copenhagen European Council stable institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights, respect for and protection of minorities is a pre-condition for any accession and the Union has the necessary means to verify such compliance on the part of the applicant countries. As is clear from Articles 6 and 7 of the TEU, moreover, the Union is a community of shared values. (2001/C 174 E/019) WRITTEN QUESTION E-3147/00 by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission (6 October 2000) Subject: EU financing of the planning and construction of a motorway through the Kresna gorge nature conservation area in Bulgaria 1. Is the Commission aware of the Bulgarian government’s intention to build a motorway through the valley of the Struma, which flows north to south in Western Bulgaria, to form part of Transeuropean Corridor No 4 leading from Bulgaria’s capital, Sofia, to the Greek port of Thessaloniki? Is the commission aware that Phare (cross-border cooperation programme) and the European Investment Bank are already making a contribution to the planning of this road by the Italian firm SPEA Ingeneria Europea? 2.
  • Rila Monastery Nature Park Management Plan 2004-2013

    Rila Monastery Nature Park Management Plan 2004-2013

    The Minister of the Environment and Waters D. Arsenova Rila Monastery Nature Park Management Plan 2004-2013 DRAFT Adopted by Decision # ххх of the Council of Ministers dated хх.хх, 2004 Presented by ARD/BCEGP in fulfillment of Terms of Reference commissioned by the Ministry of the Environment and Waters, # хх-хх-хххх, March 2001 The drafting and publication of this Management Plan was made possible through the generous support of the Environment, Energy and Social Transition Department of the Europe and Eurasia Desk of the United States Agency for International Development, pursuant to Contract # LAG-I-00-99-00013-00. All opinions expressed herein are solely at the authors’ discretion and do not necessarily reflect the position of the United States Agency for International Development. February, 2004 Team of Authors The Core Planning Team which drafted the present Management Plan for Rila Monastery Nature Park comprises the following members: Dr. Petar Yankov D.Sc. (ecology/zoology), Dr. Dimitar Peev D.Sc. (ecology/botany), Eng. Ventsisval Velichkov (forest engineer), Mrs. Snezhana Kostadinova (sociologist), as well as the members of the Coordinating Team of the BCEG Project, as follows: Dr. Peter Hetz (team leader), Dimitrina Boteva, MSc. (biodiversity expert) and Gergana Pavlova (administrative support). The Extended Planning Team comprises the following members: Eng. Mihail Mihailov, Director of Rila Monastery Nature Park; Ms. Nikolina Georgieva, biodiversity expert with the Directorate Rila Monastery NP, Eng. Vassil Petrov, acting Director of Rila NP, His Eminence Gabriel, Metropolitan Bishop of Lovech, representative of the Holy Synod of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church; the Most Reverend Bishop John, Abbot of Rila Monastery, Eng.
  • Mineral Composition of Neolithic Nephrite-Bearing Edge Tools from the Kyustendil District, SW Bulgaria

    Mineral Composition of Neolithic Nephrite-Bearing Edge Tools from the Kyustendil District, SW Bulgaria

    СПИСАНИЕ НА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ГЕОЛОГИЧЕСКО ДРУЖЕСТВО, год. 79, кн. 3, 2018, с. 165–166 REVIEW OF THE BULGARIAN GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, vol. 79, part 3, 2018, p. 165–166 National Conference with international participation “GEOSCIENCES 2018” Mineral composition of Neolithic nephrite-bearing edge tools from the Kyustendil District, SW Bulgaria. Preliminary data Минерален състав на неолитни нефритсъдържащи сечива от района на Кюстендил, ЮЗ България. Предварителни данни Irina Marinova, Elena Tacheva, Petya Ivanova Ирина Маринова, Елена Тачева, Петя Иванова Institute of Mineralogy and Crystallography, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia; E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Neolithic, stone edge tool, nephrite, Struma River valley. Introduction Material and methods This short communication presents results of miner- The museum exhibits were investigated in a non- alogical study on two stone edge tools from the sur- destructive way following requirements of museum roundings of Kocherinovo town and Mursalevo vil- officers at the RHM-Kyustendil. A powder sample lage (the Struma River valley), SW Bulgaria. The was taken from each of them by scratching with a stone tools are museum exhibits of the Regional steel blade and investigated under stereomicroscope Historical Museum (RHM) in the town of Kyustendil and scanning electron microscope. Step-scan X-ray and were found in 2014, in cultural layers of Neolithic powder diffraction data were collected over a range settlements. The stone tool from the surroundings of of 3–70° 2θ with CuKα radiation on D2 Phaser- Kocherinovo town has field inv. no. 3 and dimensions Bruker AXS Bragg-Brentano diffractometer (30 kV, of 2.6×2.4×0.65 cm while that one from the surround- 10 mA, step of 0.05° 2θ and a counting time of 1 s/step).
  • Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste

    Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste

    Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Develonment Europe and Central Asia Region 32051 BULGARIA Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION PriorityPublic Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste *t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized IC- - ; s - o Fk - L - -. Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized May 2004 - "Wo BULGARIA ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste May 2004 Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Europe and Central Asia Region Report No. 27770 - BUL Thefindings, interpretationsand conclusions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. Coverphoto is kindly provided by the external communication office of the World Bank County Office in Bulgaria. The report is printed on 30% post consumer recycledpaper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................... i Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................... ii Summary ..................................................................... iiM Introduction.iii Wastewater.iv InstitutionalIssues .xvi Recommendations........... xvii Introduction ...................................................................... 1 Part I: The Strategic Settings for
  • Balkan Wars Between the Lines: Violence and Civilians in Macedonia, 1912-1918

    Balkan Wars Between the Lines: Violence and Civilians in Macedonia, 1912-1918

    ABSTRACT Title of Document: BALKAN WARS BETWEEN THE LINES: VIOLENCE AND CIVILIANS IN MACEDONIA, 1912-1918 Stefan Sotiris Papaioannou, Ph.D., 2012 Directed By: Professor John R. Lampe, Department of History This dissertation challenges the widely held view that there is something morbidly distinctive about violence in the Balkans. It subjects this notion to scrutiny by examining how inhabitants of the embattled region of Macedonia endured a particularly violent set of events: the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War. Making use of a variety of sources including archives located in the three countries that today share the region of Macedonia, the study reveals that members of this majority-Orthodox Christian civilian population were not inclined to perpetrate wartime violence against one another. Though they often identified with rival national camps, inhabitants of Macedonia were typically willing neither to kill their neighbors nor to die over those differences. They preferred to pursue priorities they considered more important, including economic advancement, education, and security of their properties, all of which were likely to be undermined by internecine violence. National armies from Balkan countries then adjacent to geographic Macedonia (Bulgaria, Greece, and Serbia) and their associated paramilitary forces were instead the perpetrators of violence against civilians. In these violent activities they were joined by armies from Western and Central Europe during the First World War. Contrary to existing military and diplomatic histories that emphasize continuities between the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War, this primarily social history reveals that the nature of abuses committed against civilians changed rapidly during this six-year period.
  • Environmental and Social Data Sheet

    Environmental and Social Data Sheet

    Luxembourg, 29/09/2018 Public Environmental and Social Data Sheet Overview Project Name: STRUMA MOTORWAY (LOT 3-1 AND LOT 3-3) Project Number: 2018-0134 Country: Bulgaria Project Description: The project concerns the construction of an approximately 40 km long section of the Struma Motorway, consisting of two motorway sections: Lot 3.1 (including a dual-tube, two-lane Zheleznitsa Tunnel) and Lot 3.3. EIA required: yes Project included in Carbon Footprint Exercise1: no Environmental and Social Assessment Environmental Assessment The route of Struma Motorway is part of TEN-T Core Network Orient/East-Med corridor on the territory of Bulgaria. For implementation purposes, Struma Motorway has been divided into 5 lots, with Lots 0, 1, 2, and 4 already completed and operational. The complexity of the construction works and route selection required splitting of Lot 3 into three sub-sections, where Lot 3.2 (from Krupnik to Kresna, including the Kresna Gorge section) will be a separate project. SEA The project was part of the SOP-T 2007-2013, which was subject to a strategic environmental assessment following Bulgarian legislation in accordance with SEA Directive 2001/42/EC. The Environmental report was approved on 21 February 2007. The project is part of the General Transport Master Plan (2011), which was subject to a SEA procedure finalized with the Decision No 1-1/2010 on 12 March 2010 issued by the Ministry of Environment and Waters (MoEW). EIA The project relates to the construction of a new motorway and falls under Annex I 7b of the EIA Directive 2011/92/EU ‘construction of Motorways and Express Roads’, for which the EIA is mandatory.
  • 12A Natcheva

    12A Natcheva

    PHYTOLOGIA BALCANICA 14 (3): 425 – 428, Sofia, 2008 425 New bryophyte records in the Balkans: 5 Compiled by Rayna Natcheva Institute of Botany, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. Gerorgi Bonchev St., bl. 23, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. New chorological data are presented for 20 species of bryophytes from Bulgaria. Four taxa are liverworts (Marchantiophyta) belonging to the families Jungermanniaceae (11), Ricciaceae (9, 10), and Scapaniaceae (1). Sixteen taxa are mosses (Bryophyta) belonging to the families Amblystegiaceae (6, 17, 18), Anomodontaceae (8), Brachytheciaceae (7), Grimmiaceae (2), Hypnaceae (19), Neckeraceae (20), Orthotrichaceae (5, 14, 15, 16), Pottiaceae (3, 13), Sphagnaceae (12), and Splachnaceae (4). The publication includes contributions by A. Ganeva (1-8) and R. Natcheva (9-20). RReportseports 1–81–8 Kresna gorge (Stefanoff & Petrov 1962; Šmarda Anna Ganeva 1970; Ganeva & Düll 1999; Ganeva 2002; During Institute of Botany, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. Georgi Bonchev St., bl. 23, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria, 2008). e-mail: [email protected] Pottiaceae Scapaniaceae 3. Crossidium squamiferum (Viv.) Jur. var. squamiferum 1. Scapania aspera Bernet & M.Bernet Bu Pirin Mts: S slopes of the hill NE of Nova Lovcha Bu Balkan Range (Central): Nature Park Bulgarka, village, 717 m, GL-29, 31.03.2007, coll. A. Ganeva on calcareous rocks in the SE part of the park, & R. Natcheva, det. A. Ganeva (SOM-B 9843). LH-63, 22.07.2008, coll. V. Roussakova, det. A. This taxon was reported from the Rhodopi Mts Ganeva (SOM-B 9872). (Velenovsky 1902), Mt Konyavska and Kresna gorge New to the Balkan Range and the N part of Bulgaria.
  • Waste-Cluster Relationship on the Example of Regional Waste Landfill in Blagoevgrad

    Waste-Cluster Relationship on the Example of Regional Waste Landfill in Blagoevgrad

    ECOLOGIA BALKANICA 2019, Special Edition 2 pp. 181-185 Waste-cluster Relationship on the Example of Regional Waste Landfill in Blagoevgrad Stefka K. Tsekova, Veselina H. Dalgacheva*, Nikolinka K. Atanasova South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Department of Geography, Ecology and Environmental Protection, 66 Ivan Mihailov Str., 2700 Blagoevgrad, BULGARIA *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract. Bulgaria is facing serious challenges about environmentally friendly way of waste management. Commissioning of the Regional Waste Management System - Blagoevgrad is going to ensure their environmentally friendly utilization and disposal, which is in close relation with the defined hierarchy in Bulgarian Waste management act - prevention, utilization, final disposal. The attempt to be created relation between regional waste management and cluster policy is related to the development of a cluster model, named by authors "Waste utilization and mitigation of climate change”. The implementation of the model will contribute to sustainable and efficient waste management in Blagoevgrad region, as well as in the territory of Bulgaria, in relation with the requirements of European legislation. In other side this contributing to the realization of the main Community priorities for Cohesion Policy: sustainable development and increasing the attractiveness of regions, by improving accessibility, ensuring adequate quality and level of services and preserving their environmental potential. Key words: regional waste management, cluster model, resource utilization, climate change, mitigation, Blagoevgrad, municipality. Introduction which includes municipalities from Environmentally friendly waste Blagoevgrad and Kyustendil province. management is a priority for the European (Ministry of environment and water, List of countries in transition, especially for the last Regional associations of waste management in 10-15 years.