DOCSLIB.ORG

PRINCIPAL HOMOGENEOUS SPACES. SELMER GROUP and SHAFAREVICH-TATE GROUP. Introduction the Goal of the Paper Is to Introduce the Se

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PRINCIPAL HOMOGENEOUS SPACES. SELMER GROUP and SHAFAREVICH-TATE GROUP. Introduction the Goal of the Paper Is to Introduce the Se PRINCIPAL HOMOGENEOUS SPACES. SELMER GROUP AND SHAFAREVICH-TATE GROUP. DIMITAR P. JETCHEV Abstract. A proof of the ¯niteness of the weak Mordell-Weil groups is presented as a motiva- tion for the de¯nitions of Selmer and Shafarevich-Tate groups. The two groups are interpreted geometrically in terms of principal homogeneous spaces. We prove the ¯niteness of the Selmer group and then explain how to compute it for the case of elliptic curves. For higher genus curves, it is di±cult to describe explicitly the homogeneous spaces in terms of equation and so we present a slightly di®erent method for computing Selmer groups in terms of functions on the Jacobian of the curve. Several speci¯c examples are considered at the end. Introduction The goal of the paper is to introduce the Selmer group and Shafarevich-Tate group by using the proof of the weak Mordell-Weil theorem as a motivation. This approach allows us to present a more geometric interpretation of the two groups in terms of principal homogeneous spaces and their relation to Galois cohomology. In section 1, we introduce the Kummer pairing and prove its main properties. We compute the left and right kernels and then view the pairing in terms of the coboundary map in a long exact sequence in Galois cohomology. In section 2, we study in details the properties of the right kernel of the pairing, which turns out to be a ¯nite index subgroup of the Galois group Gal(K=K). Several classical results from algebraic number theory are assumed, such as the Dirichlet's S-unit theorem and standard facts about unrami¯ed ¯eld extensions of a number ¯eld. Section 3 is devoted to the classical techniques for computing the weak Mordell-Weil by con- structing a pairing b : E(K)=mE(K) E[m] K¤=K¤m out of the Weil pairing and using explicit description of principal homogeneous£spaces.!In section 4, we illustrate these techniques for the case m = 2, which is known as complete 2-descent. In section 5, we de¯ne Selmer group and Shafarevich-Tate group using Galois cohomology and then interpret the two groups geometrically, in terms of rational points on homogeneous spaces. We state one of the big open problems in number theory - the conjecture about the ¯niteness of X. In section 6, we prove the ¯niteness of the Selmer group and explain the main techniques for computing this group for elliptic curves. In the next section, we illustrate these techniques for the case of 2-isogenies. In the last section, we introduce another method for computing the Selmer group which works in a greater generality and uses rational functions on the Jacobian of the curve. 1. Weak Mordell-Weil Group and Kummer Pairing via Galois Cohomology Suppose that E=K is an elliptic curve over a number ¯eld and m 2 is an integer, such that E[m] E(k). We de¯ne the weak Mordell-Weil group for E=K to¸be the quotient group E(K)=mE(K), where E(K) is the group of rational points on the elliptic curve E. This group is an interesting object to study for each m, since it contains a lot of information about the full Mordell-Weil group E(K). In fact, De¯ne a pairing · : E(K) Gal(K=K) E[m]; £ ! 1 2 DIMITAR P. JETCHEV in the following way: for each P E(K) choose Q E, such that [m]Q = P and let ·(P; ) := Q Q. 2 2 First¡ of all, this pairing is well-de¯ned. Indeed, suppose that Q0 is another point, such that [m]Q = [m]Q0 = P . We need to check that Q0 Q0 = Q Q. But [m](Q0 Q) = 0, i.e. 0 0 ¡ ¡ ¡ Q Q E[m] E(K), which means that Q Q is ¯xed by the action of Gal(K=K). Hence, (Q¡0 Q)2 = Q0 Q, or Q0 Q0 = Q Q. We¡often call the pairing · the Kummer pairing. The¡ basic prop¡erties of · ¡are summarized¡ in the following proposition: Proposition 1.1. The pairing · is bilinear, with left kernel equal to mE(K) and right kernel equal to Gal(K=L), where L is a ¯eld extension of K obtained by adjoining the coordinates of all points in [m]¡1E(K) (or L = K([m]¡1E(K))). In particular, · induces a perfect bilinear pairing E(K)=mE(K) Gal(L=K) E[m]: £ ! Proof: Bilinearity of · is obvious from the de¯nition. Suppose that P E(K) is in the left 2 kernel of ·. Choose Q E(K), such that [m]Q = P . We will show that Q E(K) and thus, it will follow that P mE(K2). But this is clear from the de¯nition, since ·(P;2) = 0 means precisely that Q is ¯xed2by . Conversely, any P mE(K) is in the left kernel of ·. 2 Let Gal(K=K)(K) be in the right kernel. In this case it su±ces to show that ¯xes the ¯eld extension2L=K. Let P E(K) and Q be a point, such that [m]Q = P . Then ·(P; ) = 0 implies 2 ¡ Q = Q. Since this is true for any point in [m] 1E(K), then L is ¯xed by , i.e. Gal(K=L). 2¡ Conversely, any Gal(K=L) is in the right kernel, because it ¯xes the points in [m] 1E(K). We obtain the p2erfect bilinear pairing by moding out by the left and right kernels of ·. ¤ Next, our goal is to describe the Kummer pairing in terms of Galois cohomology. To begin with, consider the short exact sequence of Gal(K=K)-modules for a ¯xed integer m > 1 [m] 0 E[m] E(K) E(K) 0: ! ¡¡¡¡! ¡¡¡¡! ! This short exact sequence gives a long exact sequence on cohomology [m] 0 H0(Gal(K=K); E[m]) H0(Gal(K=K); E(K)) H0(Gal(K=K); E(K)) ¡¡¡¡! ¡¡¡¡! ¡¡¡¡! [m] ± H1(Gal(K=K); E[m]) H1(Gal(K=K); E(K)) H1(Gal(K=K); E(K)): ¡¡¡¡! ¡¡¡¡! ¡¡¡¡! But H0(G; M) = M G for any group G and a G-module M, so we rewrite the above sequence as [m] 0 E(K)[m] E(K) E(K) ¡¡¡¡! ¡¡¡¡! ¡¡¡¡! [m] ± H1(Gal(K=K); E[m]) H1(Gal(K=K); E(K)) H1(Gal(K=K); E(K)): ¡¡¡¡! ¡¡¡¡! ¡¡¡¡! Next, we obtain a short exact sequence out of this long exact sequence, using the fact that ker ± = mE(K). We call this short exact sequence the Kummer sequence: 0 E(K)=mE(K) ± H1(Gal(K=K); E[m]) H1(Gal(K=K); E(K))[m] 0: ! ¡¡¡¡! ¡¡¡¡! ! Since the left kernel of the pairing · is mE(K), then · induces a homomorphism ± : E(K)=mE(K) Hom(Gal(K=K); E[m]): E ! Using the Galois cohomology discussion from above, the homomorphism ±E is precisely the con- necting homomorphism ± for the long exact sequence, constructed above. PRINCIPAL HOMOGENEOUS SPACES. SELMER GROUP AND SHAFAREVICH-TATE GROUP 3 2. Properties of the Field Extension L = K([m]¡1E(K))=K After introducing the Kummer pairing in the previous section, we will to study in a more detail the ¯eld extension L = K([m]¡1E(K)), which appeared in proposition 1.1 in the previous section. The main result that we prove is that this extension is abelian of exponent m, which is unrami¯ed outside of a ¯nite set of places º. Then, using a general result from algebraic number theory, we prove that L=K is a ¯nite extension. The main properties of the ¯eld extension L=K are summarized in the following Proposition 2.1. (i) The ¯eld extension L=K is an abelian extension of exponent m. In other words, the Galois group Gal(L=K) is abelian and every element has order dividing m. (ii) If S is the ¯nite set of places, at which E has bad reduction, together with the in¯nite places and the places º, for which º(m) = 0, then L=K is unrami¯ed at each º = S. 6 2 The following lemma will be used in the proof of the proposition: Lemma 2.2. Suppose that º is a discrete valuation, such that º(m) = 0 and E=K has a good reduction at º. Then the reduction map E(K)[m] E~ (k ) is injective. ! º º Proof: This is proved in [Sil-1, VIII. 1]. ¤ x We are now ready to prove the proposition: Proof of proposition 2.1: (i) This is a consequence of proposition 1.1. Indeed, the map ·(; ) is an injection Gal(L=K) Hom(E(K); E[m]). Therefore every element of Gal(L=K) is 7!abelian¢ and of order dividing m, !since every homomorphism of Hom(E(K); E[m]) has order dividing m. (ii) Take a point Q [m]¡1E(K) and let P = [m]Q. Consider the extension L = K(Q) over K. It su±ces to show that2this extension is unrami¯ed at each º = S. Let º 0 be an extension of º in K(Q) 2 and Dº0=º and Iº0=º be the inertia and the decomposition groups, respectively. We will be done if we show that each element of Iº0=º acts trivially on K(Q). Indeed, every element of Iº0=º acts triv- ~ 0 0 0 » ~ ~ ~ ially on Eº (kº0 ), where kº0 denote the reduction of K(Q) at º . Therefore (Q Q) = Q Q = 0 ¡1 ¡ ¡ for all Iº0=º . But Q Q E[m], because Q [m] E(K).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:1507.08163V2 [Math.DG] 10 Nov 2015 Ainld C´Ordoba)
    GEOMETRIC FLOWS AND THEIR SOLITONS ON HOMOGENEOUS SPACES JORGE LAURET Dedicated to Sergio. Abstract. We develop a general approach to study geometric flows on homogeneous spaces. Our main tool will be a dynamical system defined on the variety of Lie algebras called the bracket flow, which coincides with the original geometric flow after a natural change of variables. The advantage of using this method relies on the fact that the possible pointed (or Cheeger-Gromov) limits of solutions, as well as self-similar solutions or soliton structures, can be much better visualized. The approach has already been worked out in the Ricci flow case and for general curvature flows of almost-hermitian structures on Lie groups. This paper is intended as an attempt to motivate the use of the method on homogeneous spaces for any flow of geometric structures under minimal natural assumptions. As a novel application, we find a closed G2-structure on a nilpotent Lie group which is an expanding soliton for the Laplacian flow and is not an eigenvector. Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1. Geometric flows on homogeneous spaces 2 1.2. Bracket flow 3 1.3. Solitons 4 2. Some linear algebra related to geometric structures 5 3. The space of homogeneous spaces 8 3.1. Varying Lie brackets viewpoint 8 3.2. Invariant geometric structures 9 3.3. Degenerations and pinching conditions 11 3.4. Convergence 12 4. Geometric flows 13 arXiv:1507.08163v2 [math.DG] 10 Nov 2015 4.1. Bracket flow 14 4.2. Evolution of the bracket norm 18 4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Topics on the Geometry of Homogeneous Spaces
    TOPICS ON THE GEOMETRY OF HOMOGENEOUS SPACES LAURENT MANIVEL Abstract. This is a survey paper about a selection of results in complex algebraic geometry that appeared in the recent and less recent litterature, and in which rational homogeneous spaces play a prominent r^ole.This selection is largely arbitrary and mainly reflects the interests of the author. Rational homogeneous varieties are very special projective varieties, which ap- pear in a variety of circumstances as exhibiting extremal behavior. In the quite re- cent years, a series of very interesting examples of pairs (sometimes called Fourier- Mukai partners) of derived equivalent, but not isomorphic, and even non bira- tionally equivalent manifolds have been discovered by several authors, starting from the special geometry of certain homogeneous spaces. We will not discuss derived categories and will not describe these derived equivalences: this would require more sophisticated tools and much ampler discussions. Neither will we say much about Homological Projective Duality, which can be considered as the unifying thread of all these apparently disparate examples. Our much more modest goal will be to describe their geometry, starting from the ambient homogeneous spaces. In order to do so, we will have to explain how one can approach homogeneous spaces just playing with Dynkin diagram, without knowing much about Lie the- ory. In particular we will explain how to describe the VMRT (variety of minimal rational tangents) of a generalized Grassmannian. This will show us how to com- pute the index of these varieties, remind us of their importance in the classification problem of Fano manifolds, in rigidity questions, and also, will explain their close relationships with prehomogeneous vector spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text (PDF Format)
    ASIAN J. MATH. © 2017 International Press Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 397–428, June 2017 001 FUNCTIONAL EQUATION FOR THE SELMER GROUP OF NEARLY ORDINARY HIDA DEFORMATION OF HILBERT MODULAR FORMS∗ † ‡ SOMNATH JHA AND DIPRAMIT MAJUMDAR Abstract. We establish a duality result proving the ‘functional equation’ of the characteristic ideal of the Selmer group associated to a nearly ordinary Hilbert modular form over the cyclotomic Zp extension of a totally real number field. Further, we use this result to establish an ‘algebraic functional equation’ for the ‘big’ Selmer groups associated to the corresponding nearly ordinary Hida deformation. The multivariable cyclotomic Iwasawa main conjecture for nearly ordinary Hida family of Hilbert modular forms is not established yet and this can be thought of as a modest evidence to the validity of this Iwasawa main conjecture. We also prove a functional equation for the ‘big’ Z2 Selmer group associated to an ordinary Hida family of elliptic modular forms over the p extension of an imaginary quadratic field. Key words. Selmer Group, Iwasawa theory of Hida family, Hilbert modular forms. AMS subject classifications. 11R23, 11F33, 11F80. Introduction. We fix an odd rational prime p and N a natural number prime to p. Throughout, we fix an embedding ι∞ of a fixed algebraic closure Q¯ of Q into C and also an embedding ιl of Q¯ into a fixed algebraic closure Q¯ of the field Q of the -adic numbers, for every prime .LetF denote a totally real number field and K denote an imaginary quadratic field. For any number field L, SL will denote a finite set of places of L containing the primes dividing Np.
    [Show full text]
  • Homogeneous Spaces Defined by Lie Group Automorphisms. Ii
    J. DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY 2 (1968) 115-159 HOMOGENEOUS SPACES DEFINED BY LIE GROUP AUTOMORPHISMS. II JOSEPH A. WOLF & ALFRED GRAY 7. Noncompact coset spaces defined by automorphisms of order 3 We will drop the compactness hypothesis on G in the results of §6, doing this in such a way that problems can be reduced to the compact case. This involves the notions of reductive Lie groups and algebras and Cartan involutions. Let © be a Lie algebra. A subalgebra S c © is called a reductive subaU gebra if the representation ad%\® of ίΐ on © is fully reducible. © is called reductive if it is a reductive subalgebra of itself, i.e. if its adjoint represen- tation is fully reducible. It is standard ([11, Theorem 12.1.2, p. 371]) that the following conditions are equivalent: (7.1a) © is reductive, (7.1b) © has a faithful fully reducible linear representation, and (7.1c) © = ©' ©3, where the derived algebra ©' = [©, ©] is a semisimple ideal (called the "semisimple part") and the center 3 of © is an abelian ideal. Let © = ©' Θ 3 be a reductive Lie algebra. An automorphism σ of © is called a Cartan involution if it has the properties (i) σ2 = 1 and (ii) the fixed point set ©" of σ\$r is a maximal compactly embedded subalgebra of ©'. The whole point is the fact ([11, Theorem 12.1.4, p. 372]) that (7.2) Let S be a subalgebra of a reductive Lie algebra ©. Then S is re- ductive in © if and only if there is a Cartan involution σ of © such that σ(ft) = ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do We Do Representation Theory?
    Why do we do representation theory? V. S. Varadarajan University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Bologna, September 2008 Abstract Years ago representation theory was a very specialized field, and very few non-specialists had much interest in it. This situation has changed profoundly in recent times. Due to the efforts of people like Gel’fand, Harish-Chandra, Lang- lands, Witten, and others, it has come to occupy a cen- tral place in contemporary mathematics and theoretical physics. This talk takes a brief look at the myriad ways that rep- resentations of groups enters mathematics and physics. It turns out that the evolution of this subject is tied up with the evolution of the concept of space itself and the classifi- cation of the groups of symmetries of space. Classical projective geometry • The projective group G = PGL(n + 1) operates on complex projective space CPn and hence on algebraic varieties imbedded in CPn. Classical geometry was concerned with the invariants of these varieties under the projective action. Main problems over C • To study the ring of invariants of the action of G on the graded ring of polynomials on Cn+1. The basic question is: • Is the invariant ring finitely generated? • The spectrum of the ring of invariants is a first ap- proximation to a moduli space for the action. Solutions over C • (Hilbert-Weyl) The ring of invariants is finitely gener- ated if G is a complex semi simple group. This is based on • (Weyl) All representations of a complex semi simple grup are completely reducible. • (Nagata) Finite generation of invariants is not always true if G is not semi simple.
    [Show full text]
  • BOUNDING SELMER GROUPS for the RANKIN–SELBERG CONVOLUTION of COLEMAN FAMILIES Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Modular Curves
    BOUNDING SELMER GROUPS FOR THE RANKIN{SELBERG CONVOLUTION OF COLEMAN FAMILIES ANDREW GRAHAM, DANIEL R. GULOTTA, AND YUJIE XU Abstract. Let f and g be two cuspidal modular forms and let F be a Coleman family passing through f, defined over an open affinoid subdomain V of weight space W. Using ideas of Pottharst, under certain hypotheses on f and g we construct a coherent sheaf over V × W which interpolates the Bloch-Kato Selmer group of the Rankin-Selberg convolution of two modular forms in the critical range (i.e the range where the p-adic L-function Lp interpolates critical values of the global L-function). We show that the support of this sheaf is contained in the vanishing locus of Lp. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Modular curves 4 3. Families of modular forms and Galois representations 5 4. Beilinson{Flach classes 9 5. Preliminaries on ('; Γ)-modules 14 6. Some p-adic Hodge theory 17 7. Bounding the Selmer group 21 8. The Selmer sheaf 25 Appendix A. Justification of hypotheses 31 References 33 1. Introduction In [LLZ14] (and more generally [KLZ15]) Kings, Lei, Loeffler and Zerbes construct an Euler system for the Galois representation attached to the convolution of two modular forms. This Euler system is constructed from Beilinson{Flach classes, which are norm-compatible classes in the (absolute) ´etalecohomology of the fibre product of two modular curves. It turns out that these Euler system classes exist in families, in the sense that there exist classes [F;G] 1 la ∗ ^ ∗ cBF m;1 2 H Q(µm);D (Γ;M(F) ⊗M(G) ) which specialise to the Beilinson{Flach Euler system at classical points.
    [Show full text]
  • Iwasawa Theory of the Fine Selmer Group
    J. ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY 00 (XXXX) 000{000 S 1056-3911(XX)0000-0 IWASAWA THEORY OF THE FINE SELMER GROUP CHRISTIAN WUTHRICH Abstract The fine Selmer group of an elliptic curve E over a number field K is obtained as a subgroup of the usual Selmer group by imposing stronger conditions at places above p. We prove a formula for the Euler-cha- racteristic of the fine Selmer group over a Zp-extension and use it to compute explicit examples. 1. Introduction Let E be an elliptic curve defined over a number field K and let p be an odd prime. We choose a finite set of places Σ in K containing all places above p · 1 and such that E has good reduction outside Σ. The Galois group of the maximal extension of K which is unramified outside Σ is denoted by GΣ(K). In everything that follows ⊕Σ always stands for the product over all finite places υ in Σ. Let Efpg be the GΣ(K)-module of all torsion points on E whose order is a power of p. For a finite extension L : K, the fine Selmer group is defined to be the kernel 1 1 0 R(E=L) H (GΣ(L); Efpg) ⊕Σ H (Lυ; Efpg) i i where H (Lυ; ·) is a shorthand for the product ⊕wjυH (Lw; ·) over all places w in L above υ. If L is an infinite extension, we define R(E=L) to be the inductive limit of R(E=L0) for all finite subextensions L : L0 : K.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introductory Lecture on Euler Systems
    AN INTRODUCTORY LECTURE ON EULER SYSTEMS BARRY MAZUR (these are just some unedited notes I wrote for myself to prepare for my lecture at the Arizona Winter School, 03/02/01) Preview Our group will be giving four hour lectures, as the schedule indicates, as follows: 1. Introduction to Euler Systems and Kolyvagin Systems. (B.M.) 2. L-functions and applications of Euler systems to ideal class groups (ascend- ing cyclotomic towers over Q). (T.W.) 3. Student presentation: The “Heegner point” Euler System and applications to the Selmer groups of elliptic curves (ascending anti-cyclotomic towers over quadratic imaginary fields). 4. Student presentation: “Kato’s Euler System” and applications to the Selmer groups of elliptic curves (ascending cyclotomic towers over Q). Here is an “anchor problem” towards which much of the work we are to describe is directed. Fix E an elliptic curve over Q. So, modular. Let K be a number field. We wish to study the “basic arithmetic” of E over K. That is, we want to understand the structure of these objects: ² The Mordell-Weil group E(K) of K-rational points on E, and ² The Shafarevich-Tate group Sha(K; E) of isomorphism classes of locally trivial E-curves over K. [ By an E-curve over K we mean a pair (C; ¶) where C is a proper smooth curve defined over K and ¶ is an isomorphism between the jacobian of C and E, the isomorphism being over K.] Now experience has led us to realize 1. (that cohomological methods apply:) We can use cohomological methods if we study both E(K) and Sha(K; E) at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • THE UNIVERSAL P-ADIC GROSS–ZAGIER FORMULA by Daniel
    THE UNIVERSAL p-ADIC GROSS–ZAGIER FORMULA by Daniel Disegni Abstract.— Let G be the group (GL2 GU(1))=GL1 over a totally real field F , and let be a Hida family for G. Revisiting a construction of Howard× and Fouquet, we construct an explicit section Xof a sheaf of Selmer groups over . We show, answering a question of Howard, that is a universal HeegnerP class, in the sense that it interpolatesX geometrically defined Heegner classes at all the relevantP classical points of . We also propose a ‘Bertolini–Darmon’ conjecture for the leading term of at classical points. X We then prove that the p-adic height of is givenP by the cyclotomic derivative of a p-adic L-function. This formula over (which is an identity of functionalsP on some universal ordinary automorphic representations) specialises at classicalX points to all the Gross–Zagier formulas for G that may be expected from representation- theoretic considerations. Combined with a result of Fouquet, the formula implies the p-adic analogue of the Beilinson–Bloch–Kato conjecture in analytic rank one, for the selfdual motives attached to Hilbert modular forms and their twists by CM Hecke characters. It also implies one half of the first example of a non-abelian Iwasawa main conjecture for derivatives, in 2[F : Q] variables. Other applications include two different generic non-vanishing results for Heegner classes and p-adic heights. Contents 1. Introduction and statements of the main results................................... 2 1.1. The p-adic Be˘ılinson–Bloch–Kato conjecture in analytic rank 1............... 3 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • 18.782 Arithmetic Geometry Lecture Note 26
    18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #26 12/10/2013 26.1 Genus 1 curves with no rational points Let C=k be a (smooth, projective, geometrically irreducible) curve of genus 1 over a perfect field k. Let n be the least positive integer for which Divk C contains an effective divisor D of degree n (such divisors exist; take the pole divisor of any non-constant function in k(C), for example). If C has a k-rational point, then n = 1 and C is an elliptic curve. We now consider the case where C does not have a rational point, so n > 1. We have deg(D) = n > 2g−2 = 0, so the Riemann-Roch theorem implies `(D) = deg(D) + 1 − g = n; and for any positive integer m we have `(mD) = deg(mD) + 1 − g = mn: We now analyze the situation for some specific values of n. 26.1.1 The case n = 2 We have `(D) = 2, so let f1; xg be a basis for L(D). Then `(2D) = 4, so in addition to f1; x; x2g, the Riemann-Roch space L(2D) contains a fourth linearly independent function y. We then have f1; x; x2; y; xy; x3g as a basis for L(3D), but L(4D) is an 8-dimensional vector space containing the 9 functions f1; x; x2; y; xy; x3; x2y; x4; y2g, so there is a linear relation among them, and this linear relation must have nonzero coefficient on both y2 and x4. Assuming we are not in characteristic 2, we can complete the square in y to obtain an equation of the form y2 = f(x) where f is a quartic polynomial over k.
    [Show full text]
  • Arithmetic of L-Functions
    ARITHMETIC OF L-FUNCTIONS CHAO LI NOTES TAKEN BY PAK-HIN LEE Abstract. These are notes I took for Chao Li's course on the arithmetic of L-functions offered at Columbia University in Fall 2018 (MATH GR8674: Topics in Number Theory). WARNING: I am unable to commit to editing these notes outside of lecture time, so they are likely riddled with mistakes and poorly formatted. Contents 1. Lecture 1 (September 10, 2018) 4 1.1. Motivation: arithmetic of elliptic curves 4 1.2. Understanding ralg(E): BSD conjecture 4 1.3. Bridge: Selmer groups 6 1.4. Bloch{Kato conjecture for Rankin{Selberg motives 7 2. Lecture 2 (September 12, 2018) 7 2.1. L-functions of elliptic curves 7 2.2. L-functions of modular forms 9 2.3. Proofs of analytic continuation and functional equation 10 3. Lecture 3 (September 17, 2018) 11 3.1. Rank part of BSD 11 3.2. Computing the leading term L(r)(E; 1) 12 3.3. Rank zero: What is L(E; 1)? 14 4. Lecture 4 (September 19, 2018) 15 L(E;1) 4.1. Rationality of Ω(E) 15 L(E;1) 4.2. What is Ω(E) ? 17 4.3. Full BSD conjecture 18 5. Lecture 5 (September 24, 2018) 19 5.1. Full BSD conjecture 19 5.2. Tate{Shafarevich group 20 5.3. Tamagawa numbers 21 6. Lecture 6 (September 26, 2018) 22 6.1. Bloch's reformulation of BSD formula 22 6.2. p-Selmer groups 23 7. Lecture 7 (October 8, 2018) 25 7.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Normal Homogeneous Space Su(3) So(3) /U•(2) × Has Positive Sectional Curvature 
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 127, Number 4, April 1999, Pages 1191{1194 S 0002-9939(99)04613-4 THE NORMAL HOMOGENEOUS SPACE SU(3) SO(3) =U•(2) × HAS POSITIVE SECTIONAL CURVATURE BURKHARD WILKING (Communicated by Christopher Croke) Abstract. We give a new description of the positively curved seven-dimen- 7 7 sional Aloff-Wallach spaces Mkl. In particular, this description exhibits M11 as a normal homogeneous space, although it does not occur in Berger’s classi- fication (1961). A theorem of Berger [1961] states that a simply connected, normal homogeneous space of positive sectional curvature is either diffeomorphic to a compact rank-one n n 2 symmetric space, Sn, CP , HP ,CaP, or to one of the two following exceptional spaces: 1.) V := Sp(2)=SU(2), where the Lie algebra su(2) sp(2) is given by 1 ⊂ 3 i 0 0 1 √3 0 1 √3 i span 2 ; 2 ; 2 : R 0 1 i 1 √3 j 1 √3 ik 2 − 2 2 2.) V2 := SU(5)=H, where the group H is given by zA 0 1 H := 4 ASp(2) SU(4) ;z S C U(4) SU(5): 0¯z ∈ ⊂ ∈ ⊂ ⊂ ⊂ In particular H is isomorphic to Sp(2) S1 = (id; 1) . × {± } Here normal homogeneous means that the metrics on V and V are induced from 1 2 biinvariant metrics on Sp(2) and SU(5), respectively. This theorem is not correct. We will show that there is a third exception: 3.) V3 := SU(3) SO(3) =U•(2), where U•(2) is the image under the embedding (ι, π): U(2) , ×SU(3) SO(3) given by the natural inclusion → × A 0 ι(A):= 1 for A U(2) 0detA− ∈ 1 1 and the projection π : U(2) U(2)=S ∼= SO(3); here S U(2) denotes the center of U(2).
    [Show full text]