DOCSLIB.ORG

Oklahoma Native Plant Record

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oklahoma Native Plant Record ISSN 1536-7738 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society Volume 1, Number 1, December 2001 Premier Issue Oklahoma Native Plant Society The purpose of the ONPS is to encourage the study, protection, propagation, appreciation and use of the native plants of Oklahoma. Membership in ONPS shall be open to any person who supports the aims of the Society. ONPS offers individual, student, family, and life membership. Officers and Board President: Pat Folley Photo Contest: Paul Reimer Vice-president: Chad Cox Ann Long Award Chair: Paul Reimer Secretary: Maurita Nations Harriet Barclay Award Chair: Treasurer: Mary Korthase Connie Taylor Board Members: ONPS Service Award Chair: Sue Amstutz Berlin Heck Newsletter Editor: Chad Cox Iris McPherson Librarian: Bonnie Winchester Sue Amstutz Website Manager: Chad Cox Jim Elder Paul Reimer Larry Magrath Managing editor: Sheila Strawn Technical editor: Pat Folley Northeast Chapter Chair: Jim Elder Technical advisor: Bruce Hoagland Central Chapter Chair: Judy Jordan Cross-timbers Chapter Chair: Ron Tyrl Historian: Lynn Allen Cover: Cercis canadensis (Redbud) Photo courtesy of Charles Lewallen. Conservation Chair: Berlin Heck “That man is truly ethical who shatters no Publicity Co-chairs: ice crystal as it sparkles in the sun, tears no Ruth Boyd & Betty Culpepper leaf from a tree…” Marketing Chair: Larry Magrath Albert Schweitzer Articles (c) The Authors Journal compilation (c) Oklahoma Native Plant Society Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike4.0 International License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-sa/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, not used for commercial purposes, and, if transformed, the resulting work is redistributed under the same or similar license to this one. https://doi.org/10.22488/okstate.17.100001 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Volume 1, Number 1, December 2001 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Volume 1, Number 1 Table of Contents Forward ...................................................................................................................... 2 Ms. Pat Folley, ONPS President The Spermatophyta of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma ....................................... 3 Masters Thesis of Dr. U. T. Waterfall Floristic List for Oklahoma County ..................................................................... 25 Dr. Bruce W. Hoagland Native Orchids of Oklahoma ............................................................................... 39 Dr. Lawrence K. Magrath Galium parisiense var. leiocarpum Tausch, New for Oklahoma ............................ 67 Dr. Lawrence K. Magrath Checklist of the Ferns, Natural Falls State Park ................................................. 68 Dr. Bruce A. Smith ONPS Critic’s Choice Essay : The Limestone Glade ............................................. 72 Mr. Jim Norman 2 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Volume 1, Number 1, December 2001 Foreword The Oklahoma Biological Survey is in the process of making an inventory of the plant specimens that have made their way into the herbaria housed at our universities. They will eventually make that information available on the World Wide Web. All kinds of information will be available, electronically, from those dried specimens. They are a priceless treasure, recording our past and the efforts made to understand it. Putting that data on the Web will be a way of making it accessible to people who have no physical access to the herbaria, and little time to extract it. Other kinds of plant information are stored in the minds of our members and scientists. Possibly, the files stored in computers will outlast them, maybe not. Who knows? One thing we do know: people have been interested in the flora of Oklahoma for more than a hundred years. Some of their observations have been recorded but, for the most part, not in published form. Believing that those records are important for the understanding of our current flora, The Oklahoma Native Plant Society has determined to bring some of those records to your eye in a more durable form. For many years, Dr. U. T. Waterfall’s Keys to the Flora of Oklahoma has been the only statewide source of identification keys. Few know that his first attempt to catalog the plants of Oklahoma was a master’s thesis that includes a list of the plants he found in Oklahoma County in the 1930’s. What a difference there is in Oklahoma County between that time and this! To put that survey into perspective, we are including a working copy of the Biological Survey’s list for Oklahoma County, made in the year 2000. This journal intends to publish in each issue, a previously unpublished historic study, which may serve as a baseline for your own investigations into your local flora. We will also include recent studies, student papers, current plant lists, and essays of permanent value. In the future, we hope to be able to publish either Little’s or Bebb’s catalog of plants of Muskogee County, and other such lists as may be discovered. For that purpose, we challenge the members of Oklahoma Native Plant Society to offer records and observations which they may have available. Not that there will ever be a complete record of the life in any one place, because life refuses to be reduced to a score-card, but because we believe that a knowledge of the plants of a specific location is a fundamental part of understanding other life that may be found there, including our own. You, our readers, will know of current or historic information that should be included in future issues. We hope you will share those with us. Patricia Folley, President Oklahoma Native Plant Society April, 2001 Oklahoma Native Plant Record 3 Volume 1, Number 1, December 2001 THE SPERMATOPHYTA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA EXCLUSIVE OF THE GRASSES, SEDGES AND RUSHES A THESIS APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY AND BACTERIOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE SCHOOL BY U. T. WATERFALL Norman, Oklahoma, 1942 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION collected in Virginia by John Clayton. They were described by This paper represents a the Italian botanist Gronovius preliminary taxonomic study of in his Flora Virginica (1739), the flowering plants indigenous and later given binomial to Oklahoma County. Collections designation by Linneas in the during the springs, summers and Species Plantarum. Thus the type falls of 1939, 1940, and 1941 and locality for these Linnean also during the spring of 1942. species, which are based on After the first general but Clayton's material, is in extensive collections were made southeastern Virginia. a number of special stations of Collections from that region widely varying ecological were often found to differ from structures were selected. the wider-ranging inland plants Collections were made from these referred erroneously, by most at regular intervals of about two botanists, to the Linnean weeks throughout the growing species. Fernald’s restudy of season, or at a corresponding many of these types has shown time during the next year. In that the variety occurring in a addition a search was made for restricted range along the coast stations containing different, is usually the typical one, i.e., ecological elements. Thus the the variety which Gronovius had finding of a maximum number of before him when writing the species over a limited period of description upon which Linneas time was assured by a combination based his generic and specific of extensive and intensive name, while the wide-ranging methods of collection. The plant of the interior must, in specimens were pressed in the the large majority of cases, be standard way used in the leading given a new varietal name. A herbaria. Duplicates were similar situation has been found obtained in nearly every case and to be true for plants collected were deposited in the Bebb along the coast and named by Herbarium of the University of other botanists. This will help Oklahoma. to account for the appearance of Among the most outstanding many of the varietal of the recent investigations, designations in this paper that which may be applied to the flora are not found in the existing of this region, are Fernald's floras and manuals pertaining to series of "Virginia" papers Oklahoma. published annually in Rhodora 1 1 Ferna1d and Griscom, Three since 1935. Fernald reported Days of Botanizing in Southwestern that a number of wide-ranging Virginia, Rhodora 37, pp. 129-13l, continental plants were first 1935. Waterfall, U.T. https://doi.org/10.22488/okstate.17.100003 4 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Volume 1, Number 1, December 2001 CHAPTER II HISTORY also mentioned briefly the "Cross Timbers."8 One of the first Americans A large number of plants to traverse what is now Oklahoma from Oklahoma County have County was Washington Irving, who undoubtedly been collected by with Charles Latrobe and his Thomas R. Stemen and W. Stanley fellow travelers, made a trip Meyers in the course of their through this region in the fall of investigations on which the Oklahoma Flora9 1832. Irving, in his Tour on the is based. These Prairies, recorded the events and have not been available for study his impressions of this trip. His by the author. companion, Latrobe1, may have had 1 Rambler in some botanical training as he Charlee Latrobe, North America mentioned various genera of , (excerpts in Tour on the Prairies plants seen on the journey. Irving's , The Party approached the edited by Joseph B. Thoburn and present site of Edmond on the 23rd George C. Wells. xxv. Harlow of October. Their line of search Pub1ishing Company, Oklahoma took them past the sites Arcadia, City, Oklahoma, 1930). 2 Tour on Spencer, Oklahoma City and, on the Washington Irving, the Prairies 28th, over what is now the , (1.c.), pp. southern boundary of Oklahoma 240-243. 2 3Ibid County in the direction of Moore . ., p 145. 4Ibid Irving gave a good description of ., p. 173. 5Ibid., p. 151. the post oak-blackjack woods, 6 even mentioning the dwarf oak, W. E.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Potential Spray Drift Damage: What Steps to Take?
    [email protected] • (479) 575-7646 www.nationalaglawcenter.org An Agricultural Law Research Publication Potential Spray Drift Damage: What Steps to Take? by Tiffany Dowell Lashmet Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service This material is based upon work supported by the National Agricultural Library, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. An Agricultural & Food Law Consortium Project Potential Spray Drift Damage: What Steps to Take? Tiffany Dowell Lashmet Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service As many farmers know all too well, applications of various pesticides can result in drift and cause damage to neighboring property owners. In recent years, incidences of spray drift damage have been frequent and well-publicized. In the event a farmer discovers damage to his or her own crop, it is important for the injured producer to know some steps to take. Document, Document, Document First and foremost, any farmer who suspects possible injury from drift should document all potential evidence, including taking photographs or samples of damaged crops or foliage, keeping a log of spray applications made by neighboring landowners, noting any custom applicators applying pesticide in the area, documenting environmental conditions like wind speed, direction, and temperatures, and getting statements from any witnesses who might have seen recent pesticide applications. Photographs should be taken continually for several days, as the full extent of damage may not occur for several weeks after application. The more documentation a landowner has, the better his chances of recovery will be; whether it is from the offender, the offender’s insurance or potentially even the injured party’s insurance.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the Mary K. Oxley Nature Center, Tulsa County, Oklahoma
    Oklahoma Native Plant Record 29 Volume 13, December 2013 A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE MARY K. OXLEY NATURE CENTER, TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA Amy K. Buthod Oklahoma Biological Survey Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory Robert Bebb Herbarium University of Oklahoma Norman, OK 73019-0575 (405) 325-4034 Email: [email protected] Keywords: flora, exotics, inventory ABSTRACT This paper reports the results of an inventory of the vascular flora of the Mary K. Oxley Nature Center in Tulsa, Oklahoma. A total of 342 taxa from 75 families and 237 genera were collected from four main vegetation types. The families Asteraceae and Poaceae were the largest, with 49 and 42 taxa, respectively. Fifty-eight exotic taxa were found, representing 17% of the total flora. Twelve taxa tracked by the Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory were present. INTRODUCTION clayey sediment (USDA Soil Conservation Service 1977). Climate is Subtropical The objective of this study was to Humid, and summers are humid and warm inventory the vascular plants of the Mary K. with a mean July temperature of 27.5° C Oxley Nature Center (ONC) and to prepare (81.5° F). Winters are mild and short with a a list and voucher specimens for Oxley mean January temperature of 1.5° C personnel to use in education and outreach. (34.7° F) (Trewartha 1968). Mean annual Located within the 1,165.0 ha (2878 ac) precipitation is 106.5 cm (41.929 in), with Mohawk Park in northwestern Tulsa most occurring in the spring and fall County (ONC headquarters located at (Oklahoma Climatological Survey 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc. Info
    Scientific Name Common Name Region 6 Habit Scientific Name Common Name Region 6 Habit Abies balsamea FIR,BALSAM FACW NT Amaranthus californicus AMARANTH,CALIFORNIA NI ANF Abutilon theophrasti VELVET-LEAF NI AIF Amaranthus crassipes AMARANTH,TROPICAL FAC+ AIF Acacia greggii ACACIA,CATCLAW UPL NST Amaranthus greggii AMARANTH,GREGGIS FAC ANF Acacia smallii HUISACHE FACU NTS Amaranthus obcordatus AMARANTH,TRANS PECOS NI ANF Acalypha rhomboidea COPPER-LEAF,COMMON UPL* ANF Amaranthus palmeri AMARANTH,PALMER'S FACU- ANF Acalypha virginica MERCURY,THREE-SEEDED UPL* ANF Amaranthus retroflexus AMARANTH,RED-ROOT FACU- ANF Acer negundo BOX-ELDER FACW- NT Amaranthus rudis AMARANTH,TALL FAC ANF Acer rubrum MAPLE,DRUMMOND RED FACW NT Amaranthus spinosus AMARANTH,SPINY FACU- ANF Acer rubrum MAPLE,TRIDENT RED NI NT Amaranthus tuberculatus AMARANTH,ROUGH-FRUIT NI ANF Acer rubrum MAPLE,RED FAC NT Ambrosia artemisiifolia RAGWEED,ANNUAL FACU- ANF Acer saccharinum MAPLE,SILVER FAC NT Ambrosia grayi BURSAGE,WOOLLY-LEAF FACW PNF Acer saccharum MAPLE,SUGAR UPL NT Ambrosia psilostachya RAGWEED,NAKED-SPIKE FAC- PNF Achillea millefolium YARROW,COMMON FACU PNF Ambrosia trifida RAGWEED,GREAT FAC ANF Acorus calamus SWEETFLAG OBL PIEF Amelanchier alnifolia SERVICE-BERRY,SASKATOON FAC- NS Adiantum capillus-veneris FERN,SOUTHERN MAIDEN-HAIR FACW+ PNF3 Amelanchier arborea SERVICE-BERRY,DOWNY FACU NT Adiantum pedatum FERN,NORTHERN MAIDEN-HAIR FAC PNF3 Amianthium muscaetoxicum FLYPOISON FAC PNF Adiantum tricholepis FERN,HAIRY MAIDEN-HAIR FAC PNF3 Ammannia auriculata AMMANNIA,RED-STEM
    [Show full text]
  • (Dr. Sc. Nat.) Vorgelegt Der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftl
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2012 Flowers, sex, and diversity: Reproductive-ecological and macro-evolutionary aspects of floral variation in the Primrose family, Primulaceae de Vos, Jurriaan Michiel Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-88785 Dissertation Originally published at: de Vos, Jurriaan Michiel. Flowers, sex, and diversity: Reproductive-ecological and macro-evolutionary aspects of floral variation in the Primrose family, Primulaceae. 2012, University of Zurich, Facultyof Science. FLOWERS, SEX, AND DIVERSITY. REPRODUCTIVE-ECOLOGICAL AND MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY ASPECTS OF FLORAL VARIATION IN THE PRIMROSE FAMILY, PRIMULACEAE Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr. sc. nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Jurriaan Michiel de Vos aus den Niederlanden Promotionskomitee Prof. Dr. Elena Conti (Vorsitz) Prof. Dr. Antony B. Wilson Dr. Colin E. Hughes Zürich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s ist ein zentrales Ziel in der Evolutionsbiologie, die Muster der Vielfalt und die Prozesse, die sie erzeugen, zu verstehen.
    [Show full text]
  • Hophornbeam Copperleaf
    Extension W120 Hophornbeam Copperleaf Larry Steckel, Assistant Professor, Plant Sciences Hophornbeam Copperleaf Acalypha ostryifolia Riddell. Also known as pineland three-seeded mercury. Classifi cation and Description Hophornbeam (H) copperleaf is a member of the Euphorbiaceae or spurge family. H copperleaf has a very characteristic heart-shaped serrated leaf. The other cop- perleaf species in Tennessee, Virginia copperleaf, does not have serrations on the leaves. H copperleaf can grow to heights of 1 to 4 feet. Its leaves are alternate; blades simple. Tennessee producers sometimes misidentify it as a pig- weed. The reason for this mistake is that H copperleaf has a similar emergence pattern as pigweed. In addition, it is very tolerant to ALS-inhibiting herbicides such as Envoke®, Classic® and Steadfast®, which is also consistent with the pigweed species Palmer amaranth. H copperleaf typically emerges from June to September and reproduces by seeds Late-emerging copperleaf in cotton numbering as high as 12,500 seeds per plant, according to a Kansas study. The male owers of H copperleaf are found on auxillary spikes, while the female owers are on a long terminal spike. Historical H copperleaf is native to Tennessee and can be found throughout the state in agronomic crops, pastures, or- chards, roadsides and waste areas. H copperleaf was not a major problem in Tennessee agronomic crops until early this decade. The advent of no-till row crop production along with Roundup Ready® crops has become a good niche environment for this weed. The reduction in the use of cultivation and applications of soil-applied residual her- bicides has helped this weed become more established in Tennessee.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants and a Brief History of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands
    United States Department of Agriculture Vascular Plants and a Brief Forest Service Rocky Mountain History of the Kiowa and Rita Research Station General Technical Report Blanca National Grasslands RMRS-GTR-233 December 2009 Donald L. Hazlett, Michael H. Schiebout, and Paulette L. Ford Hazlett, Donald L.; Schiebout, Michael H.; and Ford, Paulette L. 2009. Vascular plants and a brief history of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR-233. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 44 p. Abstract Administered by the USDA Forest Service, the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands occupy 230,000 acres of public land extending from northeastern New Mexico into the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. A mosaic of topographic features including canyons, plateaus, rolling grasslands and outcrops supports a diverse flora. Eight hundred twenty six (826) species of vascular plant species representing 81 plant families are known to occur on or near these public lands. This report includes a history of the area; ethnobotanical information; an introductory overview of the area including its climate, geology, vegetation, habitats, fauna, and ecological history; and a plant survey and information about the rare, poisonous, and exotic species from the area. A vascular plant checklist of 816 vascular plant taxa in the appendix includes scientific and common names, habitat types, and general distribution data for each species. This list is based on extensive plant collections and available herbarium collections. Authors Donald L. Hazlett is an ethnobotanist, Director of New World Plants and People consulting, and a research associate at the Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List For: Valley View Glades NA 418 Species
    Species List for: Valley View Glades NA 418 Species Jefferson County Date Participants Location NA List NA Nomination and subsequent visits Jefferson County Glade Complex NA List from Gass, Wallace, Priddy, Chmielniak, T. Smith, Ladd & Glore, Bogler, MPF Hikes 9/24/80, 10/2/80, 7/10/85, 8/8/86, 6/2/87, 1986, and 5/92 WGNSS Lists Webster Groves Nature Study Society Fieldtrip Jefferson County Glade Complex Participants WGNSS Vascular Plant List maintained by Steve Turner Species Name (Synonym) Common Name Family COFC COFW Acalypha virginica Virginia copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 2 3 Acer rubrum var. undetermined red maple Sapindaceae 5 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple Sapindaceae 2 -3 Acer saccharum var. undetermined sugar maple Sapindaceae 5 3 Achillea millefolium yarrow Asteraceae/Anthemideae 1 3 Aesculus glabra var. undetermined Ohio buckeye Sapindaceae 5 -1 Agalinis skinneriana (Gerardia) midwestern gerardia Orobanchaceae 7 5 Agalinis tenuifolia (Gerardia, A. tenuifolia var. common gerardia Orobanchaceae 4 -3 macrophylla) Ageratina altissima var. altissima (Eupatorium rugosum) white snakeroot Asteraceae/Eupatorieae 2 3 Agrimonia pubescens downy agrimony Rosaceae 4 5 Agrimonia rostellata woodland agrimony Rosaceae 4 3 Allium canadense var. mobilense wild garlic Liliaceae 7 5 Allium canadense var. undetermined wild garlic Liliaceae 2 3 Allium cernuum wild onion Liliaceae 8 5 Allium stellatum wild onion Liliaceae 6 5 * Allium vineale field garlic Liliaceae 0 3 Ambrosia artemisiifolia common ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 3 Ambrosia bidentata lanceleaf ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 4 Ambrosia trifida giant ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 -1 Amelanchier arborea var. arborea downy serviceberry Rosaceae 6 3 Amorpha canescens lead plant Fabaceae/Faboideae 8 5 Amphicarpaea bracteata hog peanut Fabaceae/Faboideae 4 0 Andropogon gerardii var.
    [Show full text]
  • Lajiluettelo 2019
    Lajiluettelo 2019 Artlistan 2019 Checklist 2019 Helsinki 2020 Viittausohje, kun viitataan koko julkaisuun: Suomen Lajitietokeskus 2020: Lajiluettelo 2019. – Suomen Lajitietokeskus, Luonnontieteellinen keskusmuseo, Helsingin yliopisto, Helsinki. Viittausohje, kun viitataan osaan julkaisusta, esim.: Paukkunen, J., Koponen, M., Vikberg, V., Fernandez-Triana, J., Jussila, R., Mutanen, M., Paappanen, J., Várkonyi, G. 2020: Hymenoptera, pistiäiset. – Julkaisussa: Suomen Lajitietokeskus 2020: Lajiluettelo 2019. Suomen Lajitietokeskus, Luonnontieteellinen keskusmuseo, Helsingin yliopisto, Helsinki. Citerande av publikationen: Finlands Artdatacenter 2020: Artlistan 2019. – Finlands Artdatacenter, Naturhistoriska centralmuseet, Helsingfors universitet, Helsingfors Citerande av en enskild taxon: Paukkunen, J., Koponen, M., Vikberg, V., Fernandez-Triana, J., Jussila, R., Mutanen, M., Paappanen, J., Várkonyi, G. 2020. Hymenoptera, steklar. – I: Finlands Artdatacenter 2020: Artlistan 2019. – Finlands Artdatacenter, Naturhistoriska centralmuseet, Helsingfors universitet, Helsingfors Citation of the publication: FinBIF 2020: The FinBIF checklist of Finnish species 2019. – Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility, Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki Citation of a separate taxon: Paukkunen, J., Koponen, M., Vikberg, V., Fernandez-Triana, J., Jussila, R., Mutanen, M., Paappanen, J., Várkonyi, G. 2020: Hymenoptera, sawflied, wasps, ants and bee. – In: FinBIF 2020: The FinBIF checklist of Finnish species 2019. – Finnish Biodiversity
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, COBRA HERBICIDE, 06/27/2007
    ~,..-. , o~-2r--2()();Z UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 JUN 2 7 2007 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES James Pensyl Valent U.S.A. Corporation 1600 Riviera Avenue P.O. Box 8025 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Dear Mr. Pensyl: I Subject: Add Use on Fruiting Vegetables and Okra. Cobra Herbicide EPA Registration No. 59639-34 Your Submissions Dated May 7,2007 The amendment referred to above, submitted in connection with registration under section 3(c)(7)(8) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), is acceptable provided that you: 1. Submit/cite all data required for registration/reregistration of your product under FIFRA section 3(c)(5) or 4(a) when the Agency requires all registrants of similar products to submit such data .. 2. Submit one (1) copy of your final printed la~elingbefore you release the product for shipment. If these conditions are not complied with, the registration will be subject to cancellation in accordance with FIFRA section 6(e). Your release for shipment of the product bearing the amended labeling constitutes acceptance of these oo~~~ . A stamped copy of the label is enclosed for your records. I,f you have any questions concerning this letter please .contact ML James Stone at 703-305-7391. Sincerely yours, ~. \c . .{.,. Joanne I. Miller Product Manager (23) Herbicide Branch Registration Division (7505P) Enclosure ACCEPTED . with COMMENTS (' c. f. 1'- ') r~ ~~ (. 'J .' (. .~. ,. In EPA L.e. tter Dated: " f n;','.J:"'!' " ,. ,. J u~ 2. 7 2Of§l ,. " " ,. r:, (.0 " " , Uader the Federal Ill!l8etleide. -::'. t, tJ " (' HERBICIDE '-' fuqicide dd Rodentieide Act.
    [Show full text]