DOCSLIB.ORG

Hopwoodlecture-1953 Stephen Spender.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hopwoodlecture-1953 Stephen Spender.Pdf THE YOUNG WRITER, PRESENT, PAST, AND FUTURE BY STEPHEN SPENDER Reprinted from MICHIGAN ALUMNUS QuARTERLY REVIEW August 8, 1953, Vol. LIX, No. 21 The Writer's Calling Endures, Though the Response A1ay Vary THE YOUNG WRITER, PRESENT, PAST. AND FUTURE By STEPHEN SPENDER N THIS, the occasion of giving the tasting the first fruits-I may as well tell annual Hopwood Awards, a few you that, economically speaking, being a O of you must be thinking about the writer is very like being a gambler. The first step in your career signified by receiv­ story or article that earns you $10 might ing an award. In a rather varied life, one equally well earn you $1,000. Sometimes of the things I have never done is to win you are paid a few pennies for a review, a literary prize. My first duty is to congrat­ sometimes enough to keep you for a month. ulate you on an achievement that fills me And what is true of the economics of the with admiration. Rut I must add a word of thing is also true of reputation. Many warning, which you can attribute to sour writers living today who have great repu­ grapes if you wish. You only have to look tations were hardly known during the long at lists of Nobel Prizes, Pulitzer Prizes, years when they were doing their best work. and the rest to realize how changeable-if Anyone who has lived as a writer for ?ot. £allible-is the judgment of literary twenty years or more knows too that one's Junes. stock goes up and down in what is a In a way of course, this is rather con­ fluctuating market of critical opinions. soling. To those of us-who are always in I mention these things in order to get a democratic majority-who have not won them out of the way. The point really is prizes, it shows that we may be better than that, although writers have to get started you who have. There is even more solid in one way or another with earning money consolation to be derived from reflecting and getting work published, these things that those of us who do not deserve prizes are irrelevant. When I say irrelevant, I may well win them, since the example of don't mean just that they don't matter; I many who have won them shows that in mean that part of the struggle of being a the past there has not always been an writer is to watch and to be on guard that absolutely necessary connection between they don't have relevance. To be a failure prize-winning and desert. can be discouraging. To be a success may Now that I'm on this aspect of the mean something much worse: that you feel literary career-of which you are today surrounded by people who want you to go on being one. Your publisher has sold fifty STEPHEN SPENDER., English poet and critic, whose thousand copies of your last book, and is 1953 Hopwood Lecture is presented here, is a graduate of University College, Oxford. He has published appalled when you bring in a manuscript of some eighteen volumes of essaYll and verse. His honors what may be a better book, but of which include a doctorate in letters from the University of he knows he can sell only two thousand Montpelier and honorary membership in the Harvard chapter of Phi Beta Kappa. He has been lecturing this copies. The more you are known the more year at the University of Cincinnati. you discover that you are in some mysterious 302 THE YOUNG WRITER 3°3 way arousing expectations in all sorts of people and behavior very different from individuals and groups of people who, those expected by the readers of his best­ since they read your work, feel that you selling novels. 1 became excited at his idea have a certain responsibility towards them. and pressed him to start writing this book Shortly before he died, the English which 1 felt sure would be his masterpiece. STEPHEN SPENDER The English poet and critic who delivered the 1953 Hop'wood Lecture novelist, Sir Hugh Walpole, outlined to "No," he said, "I shall never write it." me the idea of a novel he wanted to write. "Why not?" "Because 1 could not write it It was on a subject very close to his heart, in a way which would please my best-selling which he felt he understood better than public. It would have to be produced in a others. From the way he spoke it was clear small edition, for not more than two thou­ that this unwritten book was the one work sand readers. And after selling one hun­ in which he could portray his realest ex­ dred thousand copies of each of my novels, perience of life. However, it would describe 1 could not endure that." THE QUARTERLY REVIEW We can assume, I think, that anyone he found himself in another world, even who simply wants to sell a lot of copies of more real to him, of Shakespeare's A Mid­ his books will-if he knows this already­ Ju'mmer Night's Dream. In another letter, plan his career accordingly. He will not be written when he was nursing his brother, a writer, but a businessman who is dealing he complains that the identity of Tom with words as other people deal with any Keats presses on him unendurably, a pres­ other mass-produced commodity. He will sure he resents not out of selfishness but have no illusions, so he will not suffer at because he felt responsible to his world of the end of his life from the kind of heart­ poetry more even than to his brother. There break which makes Sir Hugh Walpole-if was also something about his love for a failure in his own art-the subject of a Fanny which seemed to him the surrender great biography by Rupert Hart-Davis, of his poetic world to a human one. which has recently been published. The next thing we note about the young Now that the decks have been cleared Keats is that he wanted convivial friends of success and failure, what are the legiti­ who shared his love of poetry, provided mate needs of the young writer? It's bet­ that they did not press on him too much ter, I think, to put the question in a form with their personalities. When he was in which it can be examined by examples. twenty or so, he allowed himself to think \Vhat did the young writer of the past that with Reynolds, Benjamin Robert need, as the pre-conditions necessary to his Haydon, Cowden Clarke, Leigh Hunt and gift? the rest, he had found a circle of enlight­ ened people who recognized the same po­ T ET us consider for instance, John Keats etic values as he did. He wanted to belong L and Ernest Hemingway, two young to a group of friends who correspond very men; one in London at the beginning of much to the group of French writers the nineteenth and the other in Paris at who will frequent the same Parisian cafe. the beginning of this century. Perhaps, in America today, this function What of Keats? Well, first of all, he of literary companionship is being fulfilled wanted to write poetry for no reason ex­ rather self-consciously, and with not cept that he wanted to write poetry. His enough frivolity to accompany the serious­ concept of poetry was formed from reading ness, by the creative writing courses. Spenser, Shakespeare, and, later, Milton. Brandy and coffee ought to be compul­ To him, poetry was the means of entering sory at all the creative writing seminars. the world of other poets and then creating The next thing Keats wanted was to his own poems. Besides being a poet, he was chart his course among the currents of lit­ a medical student, he was devoted to his erature and thought in his time. He dis­ brother Tom (whom he nursed through liked Pope's poetry, which he regarded the consumption that he himself was very as mere versification. He had very clearly soon to die of), to his sister, Fanny Keats, developed ideas of his own about the world and in the last months of his life, to Fanny of pure imagination which poetry should Brawne, with whom he fell so hopelessly create. He found precedents for his con­ in love. cept of poetry in Shakespeare. He was Poetry was for him a separate world critical, though admiring, of Wordsworth. from the real world of his medical studies, He was a not very generous rival of Shel­ his brothers and sisters, even his love. Thus, ley. He came to sneer at Leigh Hunt, in one of his letters he describes an occasion and he grew out of the circle of his Hamp­ when the classroom or laboratory where stead friends into the isolation of genius. he was studying suddenly disappeared, and Although he wrote that he had never THE YOUNG WRITER 30 5 allowed a shadow of public thought to en­ doubtless drive out the china and chippen­ ter his work, Keats was not without opin­ dale, just as much as the world of A Mid­ ions. He was what we would call a liberal. summer Nighrs Dream came dancing He loved freedom (by which he meant down on a beam of sunlight into the room Liberal Freedom) and hated Napoleon where Keats was learning medicine and and the British government of his day.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards a Poetics of Becoming: Samuel Taylor Coleridge's and John Keats's Aesthetics Between Idealism and Deconstruction
    Towards a Poetics of Becoming: Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s and John Keats’s Aesthetics Between Idealism and Deconstruction Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Philosophischen Fakultät IV (Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaften) der Universität Regensburg eingereicht von Charles NGIEWIH TEKE Alfons-Auer-Str. 4 93053 Regensburg Februar 2004 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Rainer EMIG Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Dieter A. BERGER 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE DEDICATION .............................................................................................................. I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................... II ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................... VI English........................................................................................................................ VI German...................................................................................................................... VII French...................................................................................................................... VIII INTRODUCTION Aims of the Study......................................................................................................... 1 On the Relationship Between S. T. Coleridge and J. Keats.......................................... 5 Certain Critical Terms................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Why Memorialize? Stephen Spender's Aesthetics of Remembrance in Vienna
    WHY MEMORIALIZE? STEPHEN SPENDER’S AESTHETICS OF REMEMBRANCE IN VIENNA* Esther Sánchez-Pardo González Universidad Complutense de Madrid ASBTRACT Drawing from current theorization on aesthetics and from the heated debates of the repre- sentation of war and violence in arts, humanities and the media, this paper engages with the issue of art (and literature) and its condition in the world today, always at risk of mask- ing the extremity or reality of suffering, either by suffocating it or assimilating it and turn- ing it into an object of pleasure for the reader or spectator. With a reflection on issues on mourning and trauma, and within the domain of cultural memory, we take Stephen Spender’s poetry, and his long poem Vienna (1934), as a prime exponent of cultural production where loss and its aftermath—crucial as well in subject formation—becomes constitutive of the aesthetic, formal, and material properties of a good number of poems. KEY WORDS: War poetry, Stephen Spender, mourning, cultural memory, melancholia, trauma. RESUMEN A partir de la teorización actual sobre estética y de los acalorados debates sobre la represen- tación de la guerra y la violencia en las artes, las humanidades y los medios de difusión, este 39 artículo incide en la problemática de la representación de todas estas cuestiones en el arte y la literatura en la actualidad. Arte y literatura corren el riesgo de enmascarar situaciones extremas de sufrimiento, bien acallándolas, bien asimilándolas y convirtiéndolas en objeto placentero para ser observado y examinado por lectores y espectadores. A través de una reflexión sobre cuestiones de duelo y trauma, y dentro del marco de la memoria cultural, ilustramos estos debates mediante la poesía de Stephen Spender, y en concreto, de su poe- ma largo Vienna (1934) como exponente de primer orden en el que la pérdida y sus secuelas —cruciales también en la formación de la subjetividad—se convierten en constitutivas de la propiedades estéticas, formales y materiales de éste y otros volúmenes del mismo autor.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviews a Congenial Figure
    unconventional deist Mary Wollstonecraft, Reviews a congenial figure. A woman writer who did so little to forward the agenda of contemporary feminism was, apparently, best consigned to silence. But by ignoring Anne Stott, Hannah More: The First More, the scholars of this period Victorian. Oxford University Press, postponed the discovery that her 2003. Pp. 384. £25.00. reputation as a sanctimonious conservative ISBN 0199245320. is not fully deserved. More’s first biographer, William Though an important figure in her own Roberts, whose Memoirs of the Life and time, Hannah More (1745-1833) was Correspondence of Mrs. Hannah More ignored by the generation of feminist appeared in the year after her death, bears scholars who began, during the 1970s, to much responsibility for the distorted rediscover forgotten or depreciated picture of More, which, as Stott notes, was women writers. The degree to which these until very recently ‘firmly embedded in scholars overlooked More is revealed by the historiography’ concerning her (p. ix). the fact that no full-length biography Roberts felt free to alter More’s appeared between 1952, when M. G. correspondence to fit his view of the way Jones’s sensible but rather perfunctory that the founding mother of the Hannah More was published, and the Evangelical movement ought to have appearance of Anne Stott’s Hannah More: written. Since few of More’s letters were The First Victorian in 2003. Yet More in print in any other form, Roberts’s was not only the most widely-read British portrait of More became the standard woman writer of her era, the author of picture, but in the early twentieth century plays, conduct books, tracts for the poor, a that picture, which corresponded to its best-selling novel and a variety of creator’s ideal of pious femininity, devotional works, but also a historical appeared less flattering.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviews 213 Especially Unfortunate for a Collection on Textuality, The
    Especially unfortunate for a collection on textuality, the essays are marred by typographical errors (“David Scan Kastan”, “feministm”, “Sommer- ville College”, “modem” for “modern”, “arid” for “and”). ;WUMWN \PMÅZ[\[M\WN ¹[MUQVITºM[[Ia[[PW_\PMQZIOMJ]\QV[WUM ways this is one of the pleasures in reading the volume. McGann’s essay from 1985 asks, “What is the relevance of textual and bibliographical stud- ies to literary intepretation?” and asserts “This is not a question that has been posed in a systematic way very often”. These statements would be unthinkable in the recent essays in the collection, a change due in a large part to McGann’s own work over the last two decades. He suggests that, faced by the same textual feature, literary historians and editors ask differ- ent questions. The former ask “what does this mean?” while the latter ask “is this right or wrong?” McGann’s essay is not about early modern texts, TM\ITWVMJa_WUMVJ]\Q\Q[QV\MZM[\QVO\WZMÆMK\WV\PM_Ia[QV_PQKPMLQ- tors of early modern women have almost always been literary historians ÅZ[\LZI_V\WMLQ\QVOQVWZLMZ\WUISMQVIKKM[[QJTM\M`\[I^IQTIJTMWomen Editing/Editing Women is both an essential primer for any would-be editor of early modern women and a stimulating statement of enduring ques- \QWV[IVLKPITTMVOM[QV\PMÅMTL1\[]OOM[\[IÅMTL_PQKPPI[LM^MTWXML rapidly over some forty years, and provides an exciting picture of both the many questions which have been answered, and those which remain for editors in this vibrant area. Elizabeth Scott-Baumann Stephen Hebron. John Keats: A Poet and His Manuscripts. London: The Brit- ish Library, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • BTC Catalog 172.Pdf
    Between the Covers Rare Books, Inc. ~ Catalog 172 ~ First Books & Before 112 Nicholson Rd., Gloucester City NJ 08030 ~ (856) 456-8008 ~ [email protected] Terms of Sale: Images are not to scale. All books are returnable within ten days if returned in the same condition as sent. Books may be reserved by telephone, fax, or email. All items subject to prior sale. Payment should accompany order if you are unknown to us. Customers known to us will be invoiced with payment due in 30 days. Payment schedule may be adjusted for larger purchases. Institutions will be billed to meet their requirements. We accept checks, VISA, MASTERCARD, AMERICAN EXPRESS, DISCOVER, and PayPal. Gift certificates available. Domestic orders from this catalog will be shipped gratis via UPS Ground or USPS Priority Mail; expedited and overseas orders will be sent at cost. All items insured. NJ residents please add 7% sales tax. Member ABAA, ILAB. Artwork by Tom Bloom. © 2011 Between the Covers Rare Books, Inc. www.betweenthecovers.com After 171 catalogs, we’ve finally gotten around to a staple of the same). This is not one of them, nor does it pretend to be. bookselling industry, the “First Books” catalog. But we decided to give Rather, it is an assemblage of current inventory with an eye toward it a new twist... examining the question, “Where does an author’s career begin?” In the The collecting sub-genre of authors’ first books, a time-honored following pages we have tried to juxtapose first books with more obscure tradition, is complicated by taxonomic problems – what constitutes an (and usually very inexpensive), pre-first book material.
    [Show full text]
  • BYRON, SHELLEY and KEATS
    THE ROMANTIC AGE THE SECOND GENERATION OF ROMANTIC POETS: BYRON, SHELLEY and KEATS - they all left England, visited Italy and died young - return to complex forms of versification and richer language - interest in the world of ancient Greece - more interest in Politics (especially Byron) - different view of Nature (less idealistic) George Gordon Byron 1. Life (1788 – 1824) • In 1809 he set out on a tour of Spain, Portugal, Malta, Albania, Greece and the Middle East. • After his return to England in 1812, he published the first ‘two cantos’ of Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage. • He became a literary and social celebrity, but then he left England in 1816, never to return. • He lived in Geneva, where he became a friend of the poet Percy Bysshe Shelley. • He moved to Venice, where he began his masterpiece, the mock-epic Don Juan. • In 1819 he moved to Milan where he became involved H. Meyer, Lord Byron, 1816, Victoria in the patriotic plots against Austrian rule. and Albert Museum, London • He committed himself to the Greek struggle of independence from Turkey. • His heart is buried in Greece, his body is interred in England. Performer - Culture & Literature George Gordon Byron 2. Main works • Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage (1812-1818). • The Giaour (1813), The Corsair, and Lara (1814): a series of verse narratives. • Manfred, a tragedy (1817). • Don Juan (1819-24). Jonny Lee Miller is Byron, in the BBC drama Byron. Performer - Culture & Literature George Gordon Byron 4. The Byronic hero • A moody, restless and mysterious romantic rebel. • Hides some sin or secret in his past.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Rise and Progress of Popular Disaffection,” in Es- Says, Moral and Political, 2 Vols
    Notes Introduction 1. Robert Southey, “On the Rise and Progress of Popular Disaffection,” in Es- says, Moral and Political, 2 vols. (1817; London: John Murray, 1832), II, 82. The identity of Junius remained a mystery, and even Edmund Burke was suspected. For an argument that he was Sir Philip Francis, see Alvar Ellegård, Who Was Junius? (The Hague, 1962). 2. Byron, “The Vision of Judgment” in Lord Byron: The Complete Poetical Works, ed. Jerome J. McGann and Barry Weller, 7 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980–92), VI, 309–45. 3. M. H. Abrams, Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Ro- mantic Literature (New York: W. W. Norton, 1971), p. 13. 4. See Anne K. Mellor, English Romantic Irony (Cambridge: Harvard Univer- sity Press, 1980). 5. Jerome J. McGann, The Romantic Ideology: A Critical Investigation (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1983), pp. 23–24. 6. Jerome J. McGann, Towards a Literature of Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), p. 39. 7. McGann, Towards a Literature of Knowledge, p. 39. 8. McGann, “Literary Pragmatics and the Editorial Horizon,” in Devils and Angels: Textual Editing and Literary Theory, ed. Philip Cohen (Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 1991), pp. 1–21 (13). 9. Marilyn Butler, “Satire and the Images of Self in the Romantic Period: The Long Tradition of Hazlitt’s Liber Amoris,” in English Satire and the Satiric Tradition, ed. Claude Rawson (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984), 209–25 (209). 10. Stuart Curran, Poetic Form and British Romanticism (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp. 12–13. 11. Gary Dyer, British Satire and the Politics of Style, 1789–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Poetic Models in Novalis, Keats, and Stagnelius Folkmann, Mads Nygaard
    University of Southern Denmark The Transfigurative Mode of Romantic Discourse Poetic Models in Novalis, Keats, and Stagnelius Folkmann, Mads Nygaard Published in: Prism(s) Publication date: 2006 Document version: Final published version Citation for pulished version (APA): Folkmann, M. N. (2006). The Transfigurative Mode of Romantic Discourse: Poetic Models in Novalis, Keats, and Stagnelius. Prism(s), 14, 27-56. Go to publication entry in University of Southern Denmark's Research Portal Terms of use This work is brought to you by the University of Southern Denmark. Unless otherwise specified it has been shared according to the terms for self-archiving. If no other license is stated, these terms apply: • You may download this work for personal use only. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying this open access version If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details and we will investigate your claim. Please direct all enquiries to [email protected] Download date: 06. Oct. 2021 The Transfigurative Mode ofRomantic Discourse: Poetic Models in Novalis, Keats, and Stagnelius Mads Nygaard Folkmann 0minant feature of Romantic literature is the wish to. transgress A;he given reality or, more precisely, to cnallenge and alternate the ways to both perceive and conceive reality. The literary text may not per it' change reality, yet it can suggest transformations indirectly by constructing new models or modes of seeing and comprehending. In this essay, I raise the question of the principle of transfiguration as a way of dealing with the Romantic desire for a radical transformation of perception.
    [Show full text]
  • John Keats 1 John Keats
    John Keats 1 John Keats John Keats Portrait of John Keats by William Hilton. National Portrait Gallery, London Born 31 October 1795 Moorgate, London, England Died 23 February 1821 (aged 25) Rome, Italy Occupation Poet Alma mater King's College London Literary movement Romanticism John Keats (/ˈkiːts/; 31 October 1795 – 23 February 1821) was an English Romantic poet. He was one of the main figures of the second generation of Romantic poets along with Lord Byron and Percy Bysshe Shelley, despite his work only having been in publication for four years before his death.[1] Although his poems were not generally well received by critics during his life, his reputation grew after his death, so that by the end of the 19th century he had become one of the most beloved of all English poets. He had a significant influence on a diverse range of poets and writers. Jorge Luis Borges stated that his first encounter with Keats was the most significant literary experience of his life.[2] The poetry of Keats is characterised by sensual imagery, most notably in the series of odes. Today his poems and letters are some of the most popular and most analysed in English literature. Biography Early life John Keats was born in Moorgate, London, on 31 October 1795, to Thomas and Frances Jennings Keats. There is no clear evidence of his exact birthplace.[3] Although Keats and his family seem to have marked his birthday on 29 October, baptism records give the date as the 31st.[4] He was the eldest of four surviving children; his younger siblings were George (1797–1841), Thomas (1799–1818), and Frances Mary "Fanny" (1803–1889) who eventually married Spanish author Valentín Llanos Gutiérrez.[5] Another son was lost in infancy.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 4 Henry Stead Swinish Classics
    Pre-print version of chapter 4 in Stead & Hall eds. (2015) Greek and Roman Classics and the British Struggle for Social Reform (Bloomsbury). 4 Henry Stead Swinish classics; or a conservative clash with Cockney culture On 1 November 1790 Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France was published in England. The counter-revolutionary intervention of a Whig politician who had previously championed numerous progressive causes provided an important rallying point for traditionalist thinkers by expressing in plain language their concerns 1 Pre-print version of chapter 4 in Stead & Hall eds. (2015) Greek and Roman Classics and the British Struggle for Social Reform (Bloomsbury). about the social upheaval across the channel. From the viewpoint of pro- revolutionaries, Burke’s Reflections gave shape to the conservative forces they were up against; its publication provoked a ‘pamphlet war’, which included such key radical responses to the Reflections as Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Man (1790) and Tom Paine’s The Rights of Man (1791).1 In Burke’s treatise, he expressed a concern for the fate of French civilisation and its culture, and in so doing coined a term that would haunt his counter-revolutionary campaign. Capping his deliberation about what would happen to French civilisation following the overthrow of its nobility and clergy, which he viewed as the twin guardians of European culture, he wrote, ‘learning will be cast into the mire, and trodden down under the hoofs of a swinish multitude’. This chapter asks what part the Greek and Roman classics played in the cultural war between British reformists and conservatives in the periodical press of the late 1810s and early 1820s.
    [Show full text]
  • Bloody Poetry: on the Role of Medicine in John Keats's Life and Art
    Caroline Bertonèche, On the Role of Medicine in John Keat’s Life and Art Bloody Poetry: On the Role of Medicine in JoHn Keats's Life and Art Caroline Bertonèche To see Keats only as yet another British Romantic poet, author of the odes and the Hyperions, who died in exile, after one last fit of tuberculosis, is to forget that he spent as many years – six years to be precise – of his short life studying medicine as he did writing poetry. First a young apprentice to an apothecary, then a medical student from 1811 to 1816, Keats chose to start his career as an artist without completely burying his scientific past, making sure never to get rid of his old books on medicine – these books that were to previously shape his intellect before he even started putting together his collections of poems. Satisfied to have had the ability to distance himself from a rather contrasted form of education in order to favour a unified conception of knowledge, Keats will always seem to go back to those first readings as a source of reference. They are indeed the foundations of this unique rapprochement between medicine and poetry which, in British Romanticism, is certainly specific to him. It takes a visionary painter and a close friend, John Hamilton Reynolds, to remind us, in his very axiomatic letter of 3 May 1818 that Keats will never cease to praise the medical world as a means to keep “every department of knowledge” alive. From this pattern of now two complementary backgrounds, he therefore extracts the binary substance of one “great whole”1: Were I to study physic or rather Medicine again, — I feel it would not make the least difference in my Poetry; when the Mind is in its infancy a Bias is in reality a Bias, but when we have acquired more strength, a Bias becomes no Bias.
    [Show full text]
  • Disquietude Or the Leap Into the Sea
    Disquietude or the Leap into the Sea Teresa F. A. Alves* For João Flor With Whom I Read Novalis and Keats for the First Time There is so much in Night of a Thousand Blossoms (2004) that evokes the lyric voice and the pseudo-urban landscape of Frank X. Gaspar’s previous three volumes of poetry that I again chose disquietude as the undertow that pulls this poet’s imagination in a given direction and offers a focus around which I will tentatively organize my own reading of his creative work.1 This is nowhere more evident than in the ebb and flow of lines patterned upon irregular length and rhythm, which like human breathing are ruled by the cadence of emotion; or in the hitching of the highly visual world of common perception to a dreamlike sense of experience that challenges the reader to a new awareness of things; or, finally, in the spiritual endeavor made language, which weaves lyricism to the vernacular and achieves a complex web of meaning and speculation. The tripartite structure of Night of a Thousand Blossoms is, as in the preceding volumes of poems, the device by means of which Gaspar organizes and entwines intra-and intertextual resonance, each of the sections being introduced by epigraphs. These, when on the same page, make inroads into each other’s significance, and when introducing a section are thematically relevant. Epigraphs from Novalis and Frank O’Hara open this volume. The temporal gap between the Romantic German poet and the Postmodern American one is overcome by their common incidence on revelation, explicit in the passage from Hymnen an die Nacht (1800) and implicit in the revisitation of a dialogue with the sun in “A True Account Of Talking To The Sun At Fire Island” (1958).
    [Show full text]