Factors Influencing Mountain Lion Kill Rates Across Three Ecosystems in the Americas Steven Cross [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Factors Influencing Mountain Lion Kill Rates Across Three Ecosystems in the Americas Steven Cross Steven.Cross@Umontana.Edu University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers 2017 Factors Influencing Mountain Lion Kill Rates Across Three Ecosystems in the Americas steven cross [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp Part of the Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation cross, steven, "Factors Influencing Mountain Lion Kill Rates Across Three Ecosystems in the Americas" (2017). Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers. 178. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp/178 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Factors Influencing Mountain Lion Kill Rates Across Three Ecosystems in the Americas By Steven Cross Undergraduate Thesis Wildlife Biology Program University of Montana Missoula, MT May 2017 Approved by: Dr. Mark Hebblewhite, Chair, Wildlife Biology Program Dr. Hugh Robinson, Committee Member, Wildlife Biology Program Dr. Jedediah Brodie, Committee Member, Wildlife Biology Program Wildlife Biology Program 1 Abstract Kill rate, defined as the number of prey killed per predator per unit time, is a key component to understanding predator-prey dynamics. A multitude of factors may affect kill rates, including, variation in age, sex, weight, or presence of offspring of either predator or prey species (intraspecific variation) and events such as the theft of a kill made by another animal (kleptoparasitism). These factors may influence the time a predator spends locating prey (search time) and the pursuing, killing, and consumption of prey (handling time). The sum of search time and handling time may be measured as the time between a subsequent kill, a metric I will use to make inferences on what affects mountain lion (Puma concolor) kill rates. Utilizing kill data obtained from Global Positioning System (GPS) collared mountain lions of Colorado, Wyoming, and Patagonia, I investigated the impacts of: 1) mountain lion sex, 2) mountain lion age, 3) accompaniment of offspring with mountain lion females, 4) prey weight, and 5) the presence of bears (habitual kleptoparasites) throughout study periods. Applying these factors, I determined the most parsimonious and biologically sound statistical model, best describing sources of variation in time between kills for mountain lions. Determinant factors were: age of a mountain lion, in which a juvenile (<2 years old) was predicted to killed less often than an adult (>2 years old); presence of offspring, in which a female with accompanying offspring was predicted to kill more often than a mountain lion without; per kg of prey weight, in which time between kills was predicted to increase as the weight of a prey item increased; and based on bear activity, in which a mountain lion was predicted to kill more often when bears were active on the landscape than when they were not active. Further knowledge on this subject may be useful for harvest management of mountain lions regarding the lessening of impacts of predation on ungulate populations of concern, through age class and reproductive status targeting. Furthermore, I show some evidence of the indirect impacts of kleptoparasitism on ungulate populations, through the direct impacts on kill rates of predators such as the mountain lion from kleptoparasitic bear species. 2 Introduction Fundamental to understanding the impacts of predators on prey, is in the investigation of the impacts of predation, how predation is compensated by prey, and which individual prey are killed (Mills 2013). Predation itself is the product of the functional response and the numerical response of a predator in relation to a prey population. Put simply, the numerical response is the number of predators given the number of prey, while the functional response (also known as the kill rate), describes the numbers of prey killed per individual predator per unit time (Holling 1959 and Mills 2013). Adequate understanding of predator-prey systems and population dynamics relies in part on the knowledge of factors causing the kill rate of a predator to vary (Knopff et al. 2010). A multitude of factors may be influential to a predator’s kill rate, including energetic requirements, interspecific competition, and intraspecific variation among both a predator and its prey regarding sex and age (Elbroch et al. 2014, Lima and Dill 1990, Miller et al 2014). For enigmatic species, such as the mountain lion (Puma concolor), quantifying kill rates through field efforts in a natural habitat is extremely challenging. However, kill rates have been hypothesized to be driven by metabolic requirements (Ackerman et al. 1986). Thus, energetic models formed from basal metabolic rate and the energetic costs connected to activity, are utilized to estimate energetic requirements and the kill rates required to meet those energetic demands (Elbroch et al. 2014). However, estimated kill rates for the mountain lion rarely align with kill rates quantified through field observations (Elbroch et al. 2014 and Knopff et al. 2010). Many mountain lion studies have quantified empirical kill and consumption rates that were significantly greater than the rate predicted energetically (Elbroch et al. 2014 and Knopff et al. 2010). The discrepancy between predicted and observed kill rates could be the result of prevalent 3 energetic models relying solely on physiological values (e.g. mass and energy budgets) to estimate kill rates (Elbroch et al. 2014). Mountain lions often experience interspecific competition and species interactions with those of the scavenger guild (Elbroch et al. 2015b and Elbroch et al. 2014). Studies suggest that mountain lions seem to abandon and/or increase frequency of kills in the face competition and harassment from scavengers and other predators (Knopff et al. 2010, Elbroch et al. 2015a, Elbroch at el. 2015b, Elbroch et al. 2013b). These forms of species interaction seem to significantly affect mountain lion fitness and foraging behavior (Elbroch et al. 2015a). Mountain lions of the Southern Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem experienced increased starvation, altered prey selection, and increased mortality due to competition from reintroduced gray wolves (Elbroch et al. 2015b). In both Colorado and northern California, mountain lions were found to increase the frequency of kills to compensate for kleptoparasitism by black bears (Ursus americanus) (Elbroch et al. 2015a). Mountain lions of Patagonia suffered kleptoparasitism by scavengers in the form of Andean condors (Vultur gryphus), resulting in reduced handling time at kills, abandonment of kills, and increased frequency of kills (Elbroch et al. 2013b). Similarly, ravens (Corvus corax) were revealed to scavenge up to 75% of the edible biomass of kills made by small grey wolf (Canis lupus) packs (2-3 individuals) in the Yukon, thereby increasing kill rates in those packs (Kaczensky et al. 2005). Mountain lions, being solitary ambush hunters, are seemingly limited in their ability to balance both the consumption and defense of kills from scavengers and kleptoparasites (Elbroch et al. 2015a, Elbroch et al. 2013b, Husseman et al. 2003). Thus, mountain lions may need to increase kill rates to counteract biomass acquisition loss. In contrast, Amur tigers (Panthera tigris altaica), a solitary felid who also ambushes prey, demonstrated higher empirical kill rates than energetically predicted despite little to no 4 interspecific competition (Miller et al. 2014). Amur tigers were thought to be using an optimal foraging strategy, in which tigers were actively minimizing risk of starvation instead of simply meeting daily basal energetic minimums. By increasing their kill rates (thereby increasing overall mean consumption rate (kg/day)), Amur tigers were thought to be reducing their chances of starvation over a given time (essentially killing as often as possible), thus prey encounter rate appeared to be a driving factor in determining kill rates (Miller et al. 2014). This coincides with the notion that solitary felids are random predators that kill prey as available within normal prey size limits (Husseman et al. 2003). Mountain lion kill rates have been shown to be variable per age, sex, and reproductive status though the direction and magnitude of variation is inconsistent among various studies (Knopff et al. 2010 and Pierce et al. 2000). Females with kittens often have higher predation rates compared to solitary mountain lions due to higher energetic requirements as kittens grow (Knopff et al. 2010). Adult males often have higher kill rates than adult females, although Knopff et al. (2010) found that though males in their study had lower kill rates, prey size and consequently, biomass acquisition was higher. This may stem from the larger size of males allowing for the take of larger prey with less risk than smaller females (Sunquist and Sunquist 1989). Subadults usually kill less often and rely more on nonungulate prey items compared to adults, possibly due to lack of experience (Murphy 1998). Risk of injury for subadults during a predation event may lead to choosing prey that can be adequately handled (Pierce et al. 2000). Utilizing kill data obtained from GPS-collared mountain lions of Colorado, Wyoming, and Patagonia,
Recommended publications
  • Trade in Andean Condor Vulture Gryphus Feathers and Body Parts in the City of Cusco and the Sacred Valley, Cusco Region, Peru Robert S
    Vulture News 61 September 2011 Trade in Andean Condor Vulture gryphus feathers and body parts in the city of Cusco and the Sacred Valley, Cusco region, Peru Robert S. R. Williams1*, Jose Luis Jara1, Daphne Matsufuiji2 and Anahi Plenge2 1Frankfurt Zoological Society and the Andean Condor Working Group – Peru 2Clorinda Matto de Turner 305, Urb. Magisterio, Cusco, Peru *Corresponding author: [email protected] Summary The sale of Andean Condor feathers and body parts is undertaken openly in the tourist markets of Cusco and the Sacred Valley. This trade is illegal but there is no enforcement of existing legislation. We visited the main tourist markets of the region to ascertain the extent of the trade, reasons motivating it and value. We found condor feathers for sale in 26 establishments. Feathers were sold singly, decorated and incorporated in handicrafts. Prices ranged from 5 soles for a small body feather to 160 soles for a main primary and we found handicrafts for sale at prices of up to 650 soles (featuring 6 feathers). We were offered a whole condor for sale at a market in Cusco for 2,500 soles. Investigations revealed that there are condor hunters working to supply this trade in both the Cordillera Vilcabamba and Cordillera Vilcanota and that the town of Calca is the base of much of the handicraft production. The trade is mainly based on three uses: alternative healing, shamanic ceremonies and souvenirs. It is crucial that the Peruvian authorities honour their commitments under international conventions and act immediately to stop this illegal trade, which is further threatening a species that is already in a precarious situation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Andean Condor: a Field Study ______
    _____________________________________ THE ANDEAN CONDOR: A FIELD STUDY _____________________________________ By: Jerry McGahan Box 71 Arlee, MT 59821 (406) 726-3480 [email protected] JerryMcGahan.com With photographs, field, and clerical assistance by: Libby Sale Dedicated to the Memory of Carlos Lehmann V Maria Koepcke Enrique Avila William Millie i Table of Contents PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDMENTS……………………………………………………… 1 1 THE STUDY .............................................................................................................................. 6 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 6 STUDY AREAS .............................................................................................................. 15 Colombia .............................................................................................................. 15 Cerro Illescas ....................................................................................................... 18 Paracas ................................................................................................................ 20 THE SUBJECT ................................................................................................................ 21 Taxonomy ............................................................................................................. 21 Description ........................................................................................................... 22
    [Show full text]
  • Biography of a "Feathered Pig": the California Condor Conservation
    Journal of the History of Biology 37: 557–583, 2004. 557 Ó 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Biography of a ‘‘Feathered Pig’’: The California Condor Conservation Controversy PETER S. ALAGONA Department of History Institute of the Environment University of California, Los Angeles USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. In the early 20th century, after hundreds of years of gradual decline, the California condor emerged as an object of intensive scientific study, an important conservation target, and a cultural icon of the American wilderness preservation movement. Early condor researchers generally believed that the species’ survival de- pended upon the preservation of its wilderness habitat. However, beginning in the 1970s, a new generation of scientists argued that no amount of wilderness could prevent the condor’s decline and that only intensive scientific management - including captive breeding - could save the species from certain extinction. A bitter and highly politicized battle soon developed over how to best preserve the condor. For 5 years the condor was extinct in the wild; however, by the time that officials released the first captive-bred birds the condor recovery program had garnered widespread public support, even among its former critics. Today, condor advocates from the scientific and activist communities work together to manage the species and protect its habitat. The condor’s story illus- trates some of the tensions, problems, and successes that have accompanied the rise of conservation biology as a scientific field and environmental movement in the United States. Keywords: California condor, conservation biology, endangered species, wildlife man- agement Introduction On Easter Sunday 1987, a team of scientists, conservationists, and government officials finally caught up with Adult Condor-9, a 7-year old male California condor (Gymnogyps californianus) that had previously demonstrated an uncanny ability to evade his would-be captors (Fig- ure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • The Andean Condor (Vultur Gryphus) ​ ​
    Meghan Sullivan Sophomore College Final Paper 10/16/16 The Andean Condor (Vultur gryphus) ​ ​ Introduction A common theme throughout our readings in the Patagonia Sophomore College was the negative impact of humans on animals. Indeed, many conservation problems arise because of human carelessness. This is true for the Andean Condor of Patagonia, which in the past has been hunted excessively by humans. Even though this problem has been addressed, the Andean Condor still faces population decline. In recent years, the number of tourists visiting Torres del Paine National Park has risen by 1400% between the years of 1986 and 2006. (Herrmann et al 2010: 6) If humans do negatively impact condors, then now more than ever, measures should be put in place to mitigate the effect. This research paper explores the relationship of humans and Andean Condors today. It will attempt to determine if human impact still negatively affects the Andean Condor population. Background At a wingspan of up to 10 ft, a height of up to 4 ft, and a weight of around 30 lbs, the Andean Condor is the largest flying bird in the world. It is known for it’s bald head, black body feathers, and white feather collar which is found only on the males. (National Geographic 2016) Man compared to Andean Condor (National Geographic 2016) Male Andean Condor (National Geographic 2016) They can be found from the Patagonian region of South America all the way to Ecuador. However, the population is not evenly distributed throughout these areas. As the Andean Condor Condor territory stretches more north, the population decreases.
    [Show full text]
  • Competitive Interactions Within and Between Species in a Guild of Avian Scavengers
    COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS WITHIN AND BETWEEN SPECIES IN A GUILD OF AVIAN SCAVENGERS MICHAEL P. WALLACE AND STANLEY A. TEMPLE Departmentof WildlifeEcology, University of Wisconsin,Madison, Wisconsin 53706 USA ABSTRACT.--Weobserved Andean Condors(Vultur gryphus),King Vultures (Sarcoramphus papa),Black Vultures (Coragypsatratus), Turkey Vultures (Cathartesaura), and CrestedCara- caras(Polyborus plancus) interacting at 217 animal carcassesat two sitesin northern Peru. At 53 carcassesfor which we knew order of arrival, Turkey Vulturesusually arrived first, Black Vulturessecond, and condorsthird. On the basisof our observationsof 8,066 aggressive encountersbetween birds, we constructeddominance hierarchies by calculatingthe propor- tion of encounterswon by an individualof one species,sex, or age during encounterswith an individual of another species,sex, or age. Within each speciesthere was a positive rela- tionship between a bird's dominanceand its age. In condors,males dominatedfemales of the sameage. Interspecificdominance was correlatedpositively with body mass.There are convergentsimilarities between the organizationsof guildsof Old and New World vultures. ReceivedI August1986, accepted24 November1986. WHENlimited resourcesare found in •9idely coramphuspapa), Black Vultures (Coragypsatra- dispersed,rich patchesthat are ephemeral and tus), Turkey Vultures (Cathartes aura), and unpredictable in spatial and temporal occur- Crested Caracaras(Polyborus plancus). We have rence, competition between consumers could shown previously that during
    [Show full text]
  • California Condor (Gymnogyps Californianus) 5-Year Review
    California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region June 2013 Acknowledgement: The Service gratefully acknowledges the commitment and efforts of the California Condor Recovery Program partners for their many on-going contributions towards condor recovery. Our partners were instrumental both in ensuring that we used the best available science to craft our analyses and recommendations in this 5-year review and in providing individual feedback that was used to refine this document. Photo Credit: Unless otherwise indicated, all photos, charts, and graphs are products of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Page | 2 5-YEAR REVIEW California condor (Gymnogyps californianus) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5- year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife, changed in status from endangered to threatened, or changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing as endangered or threatened is based on the species’ status considering the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act. These same five factors are considered in any subsequent reclassification or delisting decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Andean Condor Nesting and Behavior: a Study of a Free-Living Pair and Chick As Well As Population Behavior Near Antisana Ecological Reserve, Ecuador Ian Handler
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Fall 2018 Andean condor nesting and behavior: A study of a free-living pair and chick as well as population behavior near Antisana Ecological Reserve, Ecuador Ian Handler Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Latin American Studies Commons, Poultry or Avian Science Commons, and the Zoology Commons Andean condor nesting and behavior A study of a free-living pair and chick as well as population behavior near Antisana Ecological Reserve, Ecuador Ian Handler Academic Directors: Xavier Silva and Javier Robayo Project Advisor: Vladimir Usheña Duke University Biology, Evolutionary Anthropology Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Ecuador: Comparative Ecology and Conservation, SIT Study Abroad, Spring 2017 Handler | 1 Acknowledgements There are many individuals to thank, without the help of whom this project would not have realized its full potential. I acknowledge Xavier Silva, Javier Robayo, and Ana María Ortega for assistance in project selection and guidance, as well as education and methods assistance. Additional thanks to Diana Serrano for logistical help and guidance. Thank you to Vladimir and Veronica Usheña for help with methods, data collection, guidance, lodging and transportation. Another thanks to all who assisted at Tambo Cóndor during my stay, including Norma and Valentina. A great thanks is due to Sebastián Kohn and Fabricio Narváez for allowing for my involvement in the tagging of the condor chick, as well as help with methods, data, and photography. The data collection and photography contributions of Annet Lems and Tom McNamara were greatly appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecuador Birding the Chocó-Andes Region: Western and Eastern Slopes of Ecuador November 25-December 4, 2018
    MINDO CLOUD FOREST ECUADOR Birding the Chocó-Andes Region: Western and Eastern Slopes of Ecuador NOVEMBER 25-DECEMBER 4, 2018 Per square mile, Ecuador has the PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS highest biodiversity in the world, including some 1,640 species of birds, • Explore diverse habitats at varying elevations at national and private reserves, including Alambi Cloud Forest Reserve, many of which are rare and endemic. the subtropical rainforest at Milpe Bird Sanctuary, páramo Discover the amazing contrasts of ecosystem at Antisana Ecological Reserve, and more. cloud forest, the Amazon, and Andean landscapes on this 10-day birding • Seek out some of Ecuador’s approximately 130 adventure. With assistance from an hummingbird species, including the Giant Hummingbird, Black-tailed Trainbearer, Sword-billed Hummingbird, expert guide, encounter a variety of Tourmaline Sunangel, and Glowing Puffleg. birds, plants, and other wildlife while traversing a selection of Ecuador’s • Identify other target species like the Andean Condor, 50 different ecosystems. The program Andean Cock-of-the-rock, Long-wattled Umbrellabird, Chocó Trogon, and dozens of tanagers. begins with a journey to Mindo Loma Private Reserve and its 17 acres of primary and secondary recovering cloud forest. Also experience the WHAt’s INCLUDED? Milpe Bird Sanctuary in the Chocó • Bilingual local guide Andean foothills, considered one of • Driver the finest sites in all of Ecuador. Along • Accommodations the way, meet a famous Ecuadorian • Activities ornithologist, view the snow-capped • Private transportation Antisana Volcano, and straddle the • Meals equator at the Middle of the World • Beverages with meals Monument. • Carbon offsetting BUFF-TAILED CORONET BY JULIAN LONDONO holbrooktravel.com | 800-451-7111 ANTISANA VOLCANO BY MARCIO RAMALHO ITINERARY areas of original cloud forest habitat and wildlife, where you will be able to experience the natural beauty and BLD = BREAKFAST, LUNCH, DINNER wonder of this very unique and biologically diverse environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Latitudinal Patterns in the Diet of Andean Condor (Vultur Gryphus) In
    Science of the Total Environment 741 (2020) 140220 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Science of the Total Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv Latitudinal patterns in the diet of Andean condor (Vultur gryphus)in Chile: Contrasting environments influencing feeding behavior Melanie Duclos a,f,⁎, Pablo Sabat a,b, Seth D. Newsome c, Eduardo F. Pavez d, Cristóbal Galbán-Malagón e, Fabian M. Jaksic a, Verónica Quirici f,⁎⁎ a Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES), Santiago, Chile b Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile c Department of Biology, University of New México, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA d Bioamérica Consultores, Avenida Nueva Providencia 1881, Of. 2208, Providencia, Santiago, Chile e Centro GEMA, Genómica Ecología y Medio Ambiente, Universidad Mayor, Huechuraba, Santiago, Chile f Centro de Investigación para la Sustentabilidad (CIS), Universidad Andres Bello, República 440, Santiago, Chile HIGHLIGHTS GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT • Anthropized environments alter avail- ability of resources for Andean condors. • Little evidence as to how condor's diet vary along their large latitudinal range • Introduced domestic and exotic species are common Andean condor prey across Chile. • Condors in anthropized areas use C4- based food from landfills/corn-fed live- stock. • Anthropic subsidies may help stabilize populations, also enhance mortality risks. article info abstract Article history: Human-dominated environments alter the availability and quality of resources for many species, especially for Received 18 April 2020 scavengers that have large home ranges and plastic foraging behaviors that enable them to exploit novel re- Received in revised form 12 June 2020 sources. Along the western slope of the Andes, the modification of natural landscapes have resulted in significant Accepted 12 June 2020 declines in native prey, the introduction of non-native species, and an increase in the availability of anthropo- Available online 21 June 2020 genic resources.
    [Show full text]
  • New World Vultures Vs. Old World Vultures
    New World Vultures vs. Old World Vultures There are two different groups of vultures, New World vultures (from the continents of North and South America) and Old World vultures (from Europe, Africa, and Asia). Vultures are a great example of convergent evolution, or the development of similar animals that occupy the same niche, but are not related. New World vultures include 7 species from 5 different genus; the black vulture, turkey vulture, king vulture, greater and lesser yellow-headed vultures, the Andean condor, and the California condor. Old World vultures include 16 species from 9 different genus; the cinereous vulture, lammergeier (or bearded vulture), palm-nut vulture, griffon vulture, Indian white-rumped vulture, Ruppell’s vulture, long-billed vulture, slender-billed vulture, Himalayan griffon vulture, white-backed vulture, cape vulture, Egyptian vulture, red-headed vulture, lappet-faced vulture, and the white-headed vulture. Vultures have an important role in their habitats because they feed primarily on carrion, or the flesh of dead animals. They are particularly good scavengers as they can fly and cover a greater distance than scavengers that are on foot. There are two main similarities between the two groups of vultures. They both have naked heads, or very few feathers on their heads. This is because they often stick their heads inside carcasses to pull out meat, and they get very messy. It is easier to keep a baldhead clean. This cuts down on bacteria that could grow in their feathers and make them sick. The second similarity is the large wingspan that makes them able to fly at high altitudes and soar on thermals in order to find their next meal.
    [Show full text]
  • Enrichments for Captive Andean Condor (Vultur Gryphus) in Zuleta, North Ecuador
    Enrichments for captive Andean Condor (Vultur gryphus) in Zuleta, North Ecuador Yann Potaufeu (2014) 1 Introduction Over recent decades, enrichment has been shown to be an important component for the well-being of animals in captivity. The AZA (Association of Zoos and Aquariums) Behavior Scientific Advisory Group defined enrichment as “a dynamic process for enhancing animal environments within the context of the animals’ behavioral biology and natural history. Environmental changes are made with the goal of increasing the animal’s behavioral choices and drawing out their species-appropriate behaviors, thus enhancing animal welfare”1. In practice, this consists in providing stimulating and/or challenging elements for an animal in order to keep it physically and mentally fit, and to avoid abnormal behaviors that occur due to captivity. The Galo Plaza Lasso Foundation (GPLF) is a NGO involved in conservation, education and social development in Zuleta, a community situated in the Imbabura province of the northern Ecuadorian Andes. Among its activities is the Condor Huasi Project, a rescue and breeding program for Andean Condors (Vultur gryphus). The GPLF is in charge of seven adult condors. Six of these birds were rescued, whilst one female was born in captivity. They are divided in four enclosures, as shown by Table 1. ♀ ♂ Enclosure 1 Reina Pacha Rucu Enclosure 2 Coya Tarishka Enclosure 3 Ayu Inti Enclosure 4 -- Pimampiro Table 1: Enclosures and condors within them In 2013, an effort was made to experiment and find enrichments for the condors. Different environmental (stimulation) and feeding (challenge) ones were tried. This article documents our ideas, success and failures.
    [Show full text]
  • ANDEAN CONDOR (Vultur Gryphus) CARE MANUAL
    ANDEAN CONDOR (Vultur gryphus) CARE MANUAL CREATED BY AZA Andean Condor Species Survival Plan® IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA Raptor Taxon Advisory Group® Andean Condor Care Manual Andean Condor (Vultur gryphus) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Raptor TAG 2010. Andean Condor (Vultur gryphus) Care Manual. Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Spring, MD. Authors and Significant Contributors: Michael Mace, San Diego Zoo’s Wild Animal Park, Andean Condor SSP Coordinator John Azua, Denver Zoological Gardens, Andean Condor SSP Treasurer David Oehler, Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden Dr. Bruce Rideout, San Diego Zoo, Andean Condor SSP Pathology Advisor Dr. Nadine Lamberski, Andean Condor SSP Veterinary Advisor Dr. Michael Schlegel, Andean Condor SSP Nutrition Advisor Mike Taylor, White Oak Conservation Center Darcy Henthorn, Oklahoma City Zoological Park Susie Kasielke, Los Angeles Zoo and Botanical Gardens, Andean Condor Studbook Keeper Chriss Kmiecik, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo, Andean Condor SSP Education Advisor Kim Caldwell, San Diego Zoo’s Wild Animal Park Colleen Lynch, Lincoln Park Zoological Gardens, Andean Condor SSP Population Advisor Courtney Kelly, BREC’s Baton Rouge Zoo Reviewers: Michael Mace, San Diego Zoo’s Wild Animal Park, Andean Condor SSP Coordinator John Azua, Denver Zoological Gardens, Andean Condor SSP Treasurer Barbara Henry, MS, Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Gardens, Nutrition Advisory Group Chair Candice Dorsey Ph.D., AZA, Director, Animal Conservation Debborah Colbert Ph.D., AZA, Vice President, Animal Conservation Paul Boyle Ph.D., AZA, Senior Vice President, Conservation and Education Andean Condor Care Manual Project Consultant: Joseph C.E.
    [Show full text]