Techniques for Mitigating Human/Beaver Conflicts in Urban and Suburban Environments
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Beaver Subcommittee Report
Beaver Subcommittee Report Report of the Beaver Subcommittee To the Martinez City Council April 16, 2008 FINAL REPORT 1 4/11/2008 Beaver Subcommittee Report TABLE OF CONTENTS HYDROLOGY/FLOOD MANAGEMENT............................................ 3 WATER QUALITY ......................................................................... 9 CREEK CLEAN-UP....................................................................... 14 CREEK WALK............................................................................. 15 BANK STABILIZATION/ Burrowing................................................ 16 IMPACTS ON OTHER SPECIES & ENVIRONMENT......................... 20 POPULATION, CONTROL, DISPERSAL ......................................... 26 EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES................................................. 28 VOLUNTEER ENGAGEMENT ....................................................... 32 PROJECT COSTS ......................................................................... 35 GRANTS & OTHER FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES ............................ 36 LIABILITY .................................................................................. 36 ECONOMIC IMPACTS.................................................................. 38 PUBLIC RELATIONS.................................................................... 39 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY ......................................................... 44 OTHER OPTIONS/ Relocation......................................................... 51 FINAL REPORT 2 4/11/2008 Beaver Subcommittee Report HYDROLOGY/FLOOD -
Animal Alliance Beaver Manual 2015
Techniques for Mitigating Human/Beaver Conflicts in Urban and Suburban Environments June 2015 Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada Illustration: Barry Kent MacKay Lethal measures are the most common approach to resolving human/beaver conflicts in Canada. Beavers are trapped or shot and their lodges and dams destroyed. The purpose of this manual is to provide parks and wildlife personnel, government officials, advocates of wildlife preservation and restoration ecology, city engineers and planners, wildlife managers, and individuals facing human/beaver interactions and conflicts with information on the best management practices and techniques for mitigating conflict. This manual provides the tools that will allow wildlife managers to maintain beavers and their contributions to healthy ecosystems, while mitigating conflicts and ensuring public safety. These approaches are most applicable to North American ecosystems. Techniques for Mitigating Human/Beaver Conflicts in Urban and Suburban Environments June 2015 Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada Table of Contents 1 Purpose and Intent of this Manual 2 Acknowledgements 3 Introduction 3.1. Information About Beavers 3.1.1. Physical Characteristics 3.1.2. Communication and Social Interactions 3.1.3. Habitat and Range 3.1.4. Lifespan and Habits 3.1.5. Feeding 3.1.6. Breeding 3.1.7. Population Self-Regulation 3.1.8. Predators 3.1.9. Construction – What Beavers Build and Why 3.2. Conservation Plans in Effect and Existing Framework 4 Ecological and Environmental Importance of Beavers 4.1. Wetlands and Water Quality 4.1.1. Maintaining Boreal Wetlands During Climate Change 4.2. Biodiversity 5 Human/Beaver Conflicts 5.1. -
BEAVER in CALIFORNIA Creating a Culture of Stewardship
BEAVER IN CALIFORNIA Creating a Culture of Stewardship KATE LUNDQUIST with BROCK DOLMAN Occidental Arts and Ecology Center WATER Institute DEDICATION To the beaver, for their patience and perseverance; to all of the people working to promote the benefits of beaver and restore them to their former range; and to this great biosphere without which we could not engage in any of these endeavors. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many thanks go to Kevin Swift of Swift Water Design (www.swiftwaterdesign.com) for copy-editing and to Toby Cowan of Performance Design Group (www.pdg1.com) for design and layout of this publication. We are deeply grateful for the following contributors who provided images, content and/or reviewed the document: Eli Asarian (Riverbend Sciences - www.riverbendsci.com); Dr. Jeff Baldwin (Sonoma State University); Philip K. Bairrington, Justin Garwood and Marisa Parish (CA Department of Fish and Wildlife); Anna Blackshaw (www. kitchenandtheegg.com); Mike Callahan (Beaver Solutions – www.beaversolutions.com); Rusty Cohn; Jim Coleman, Cooper Freeman and Olivia Rathbone (Occidental Arts and Ecology Center – www.oaec.org); Carol Evans (Elko Bureau of Land Management); Charnna Gilmore and Betsy Stapleton (Scott River Watershed Council - www. scottriverwatershedcouncil.com); Sherry Guzzi (Sierra Wildlife Coalition - www.sierrawildlife.org); Will Harling (Mid-Klamath Watershed Council - http://www.mkwc.org); Christopher Lanman and Dr. Richard Lanman (The Institute for Historic Ecology); Rachel Lundquist Diaz (copy-editor and sister extraordinaire); Zoltan Matica (CA Department of Water Resources); Mark Miyoshi and Luisa Navejas (Winnemem Wintu Tribe); Mary O’Brien (Grand Canyon Trust); Dr. Heidi Perryman and Cheryl Reynolds (Worth A Dam - www.martinezbeavers.org); and Dr. -
BEAVER in CALIFORNIA Creating a Culture of Stewardship
BEAVER IN CALIFORNIA Creating a Culture of Stewardship KATE LUNDQUIST with BROCK DOLMAN Occidental Arts and Ecology Center WATER Institute DEDICATION To the beaver, for their patience and perseverance; to all of the people working to promote the benefits of beaver and restore them to their former range; and to this great biosphere without which we could not engage in any of these endeavors. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many thanks go to Kevin Swift of Swift Water Design (www.swiftwaterdesign.com) for copy-editing and to Toby Cowan of Performance Design Group (www.pdg1.com) for design and layout of this publication. We are deeply grateful for the following contributors who provided images, content and/or reviewed the document: Eli Asarian (Riverbend Sciences - www.riverbendsci.com); Dr. Jeff Baldwin (Sonoma State University); Philip K. Bairrington, Justin Garwood and Marisa Parish (CA Department of Fish and Wildlife); Anna Blackshaw (www. annablackshaw.com); Mike Callahan (Beaver Solutions – www.beaversolutions.com); Rusty Cohn; Jim Coleman, Cooper Freeman and Olivia Rathbone (Occidental Arts and Ecology Center – www.oaec.org); Carol Evans (Elko Bureau of Land Management); Charnna Gilmore and Betsy Stapleton (Scott River Watershed Council - www. scottriverwatershedcouncil.com); Sherry Guzzi (Sierra Wildlife Coalition - www.sierrawildlife.org); Will Harling (Mid-Klamath Watershed Council - http://www.mkwc.org); Christopher Lanman and Dr. Richard Lanman (The Institute for Historic Ecology); Rachel Lundquist Diaz (copy-editor and sister extraordinaire); Zoltan Matica (CA Department of Water Resources); Mark Miyoshi and Luisa Navejas (Winnemem Wintu Tribe); Mary O’Brien (Grand Canyon Trust); Dr. Heidi Perryman and Cheryl Reynolds (Worth A Dam - www.martinezbeavers.org); and Dr. -
On the Acceptance of Urban Beavers in Martinez, California
ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF URBAN BEAVERS IN MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA By Zane Eddy A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Natural Resources: Environmental Science & Management Committee Membership Dr. Laurie Richmond, Committee Chair Dr. Erin Kelly, Committee Member Dr. Barbara Clucas Committee Member Dr. Erin Kelly, Graduate Coordinator July 2021 ABSTRACT ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF URBAN BEAVERS IN MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA Zane Eddy As ecosystem engineers, beavers construct complex riparian and wetland habitats that benefit many other species, including endangered salmonids. Through their landscape alterations, beavers also promote increased groundwater recharge and provide refugia during wildfires and high flow events by impounding water and allowing it to spread across the landscape. Prior to the North American colonial fur trapping campaigns, there were between 60 and 400 million beavers in North America. By the beginning of the 20th century, beavers were extirpated from many parts of the continent, however through human efforts, their population has since rebounded to between 10 and 15 million. The loss of beavers has significantly affected the arid west, including California where beavers had played an important role by impounding water in the surface and water on the landscape. Human tolerance of beaver behavior has been found to be one of the biggest barriers to increasing the number of beavers in California. Starting in the early 20th century, if beavers caused a disruption in human dominated areas in California, the most common action was to depredate the ii animal in order to prevent potential flooding or vegetation damage.