Modelling and Generating Complex Emergent Behaviour

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Modelling and Generating Complex Emergent Behaviour MODELLING AND GENERATING COMPLEX EMERGENT BEHAVIOUR A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Kirsty Kitto B.Sc.(Hons), B.Comp.Sci. The School of Chemistry, Physics and Earth Sciences, The Flinders University of South Australia June 2006 Abstract Despite a general recognition of the importance of complex systems, there is a dearth of general models capable of describing their dynamics. This is attributed to a complexity scale; the models are attempting to describe systems at di®erent parts of the scale and are hence not compatible. We require new models capable of describing complex behaviour at di®erent points of the complexity scale. This work identi¯es, and proceeds to examine systems at the high end of the complexity scale, those which have not to date been well understood by our current modelling methodology. It is shown that many such models exhibit what might be termed contextual dependency, and that it is precisely this feature which is not well understood by our current modelling methodology. A particular problem is discussed; our apparent inability to generate systems which display high end complex- ity, exhibited by for example the general failure of strong ALife. A new model, Process Physics, that has been developed at Flinders University is discussed, and arguments are presented that it exhibits high end complexity. The features of this model that lead to its displaying such behaviour are discussed, and the generalisation of this model to a broader range of complex systems is attempted. Themes: contextuality and complexity; reductive failure; Process Physics; quantum the- ories as models of complexity i I certify that this thesis does not incorporate without acknowledg- ment any material previously submitted for a degree or diploma in any university; and that to the best of my knowledge and belief it does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. Kirsty Kitto ii Acknowledgements This work has involved a long, very interesting, but often rather torturous journey. What began as an examination of the quantum measurement problem quickly increased in scope to the foundations of quantum mechanics, then again to fundamental physics in general, before shifting its emphasis to complex systems. Before long even biology, ecology, eco- nomics and arti¯cial life came into the scope of this project. As such, this work could not have been possible without the assistance of a large number of people from a wide range of ¯elds, whose conversations, criticisms, witticisms and creativity has challenged and extended my knowledge. A special thanks to my supervisor, Reg Cahill, without whose guidance and support this project would have been inconceivable and probably not allowed. His ideas have shaped more than my approach to physics. The ¯nal thesis itself could not have been possible without the assistance of people from a variety of disciplines and ¯elds; I would like to especially acknowledge discussions with, and often assistance from Daniel Kortschak, Susan Gunner, and Peter Wood. Also my family and friends for their patience and support. Finally, I would like to acknowledge the internet. Without the dramatic explosion of readily accessible ideas, theories, articles, preprints and tutorials that it provides, work such as this, at the boundaries of many substantially di®erent disciplines would be di±cult if not impossible; our theories are now in a position to evolve to new levels of complexity thanks to the creation of this vital resource. May it always remain free. iii Contents Abstract i Declaration ii Acknowledgements iii Chapter 1 Reductionism at its Limits 1 1.1 The Scienti¯c Method . 1 1.1.1 Reductive Analysis . 2 1.2 Complex Systems . 7 1.2.1 Contextual Complexity in Biological Systems . 10 1.2.2 Defying Reduction | Very Complex Systems . 12 1.2.3 Emergence . 15 1.2.4 Complexity and Postmodernism . 16 1.3 Contextuality . 17 1.3.1 Complexity and Contextuality . 17 1.4 Object Based Modelling . 18 1.5 The Complexity Scale . 19 1.5.1 High End Complexity . 20 1.6 Objectivity: Contextuality, Subjectivity and Observer Dependence . 24 Chapter 2 An Example System: Arti¯cial Life 27 2.1 ALife, Complexity and Emergence . 28 2.1.1 Insu±cient Complexity . 29 2.1.2 The Complexity of Development . 31 2.1.3 Measures of ALife Complexity . 32 2.1.4 ALife: Simulations versus Emergence . 37 2.2 Hierarchical Structure . 40 2.2.1 Hyperstructures . 40 2.2.2 The Ansatz for Dynamical Hierarchies (ADH) . 43 2.3 Towards the Generation of Interesting Emergent Behaviour . 46 Chapter 3 Hierarchical Systems 47 v 3.1 Hierarchical Concepts . 48 3.1.1 The Alphabet of a Hierarchy . 48 3.1.2 Span . 49 3.1.3 Dynamical Rates and Strength of Interaction . 50 3.1.4 Nearly-Decomposable Systems . 50 3.1.5 Scalar and Speci¯cation Hierarchies . 53 3.1.6 Structural and Control Hierarchies . 56 3.1.7 Dynamical Hierarchies . 57 3.1.8 Downward Causation . 59 3.1.9 The Context of a Hierarchy . 59 3.1.10 Evolutionary Transitions . 61 3.2 Theories of Hierarchical Behaviour . 62 3.2.1 Hierarchies and Open Dissipative Systems . 63 3.2.2 Hierarchies and Emergence . 64 3.3 Towards the Dynamical Generation of Emergent Hierarchical Structure . 65 Chapter 4 An Example System: Process Physics 67 4.1 Modelling Reality . 67 4.1.1 The Process Model of Fundamental Physics . 69 4.2 A Hierarchical Analysis of the System . 74 4.2.1 Near-decomposability . 74 4.2.2 Baas hierarchy structure . 74 4.3 The Historical Roots of Process Physics . 77 4.3.1 The Nature of Quantum Theories . 77 4.3.2 The Global Colour Model (GCM) and the Functional Integral Cal- culus (FIC) . 84 4.3.3 The Derivation of the Iterator Equation . 87 Chapter 5 Generalising Quantum Theories 90 5.1 Bell's Theorem and Contextuality . 91 5.1.1 The Assumptions Behind Classical Ontologies . 92 5.1.2 Bell's Theorem and Nonlocality . 96 5.1.3 Nonlocality and Relativity . 100 5.1.4 Contextuality . 103 5.1.5 The Relationship Between Nonlocality and Contextuality . 106 5.1.6 The Meaning of Nonlocal and Contextual Behaviour . 107 5.1.7 Observers in Quantum Theory . 111 5.2 Contextuality is Generic . 114 5.3 Symmetry . 121 vi 5.3.1 Symmetry and Conservation Laws . 123 5.3.2 Symmetry and Interaction . 125 5.3.3 Symmetry Breaking . 127 5.3.4 Goldstone's Theorem . 129 5.3.5 Action Sequencing . 134 5.4 Symmetry is Generic . 136 5.4.1 Economics . 137 5.4.2 Self-Organised Criticality and NG-modes . 140 5.4.3 Biological Modelling . 142 5.4.4 Arts, Crafts and Aesthetics . 143 5.4.5 A Generalised Model of Emergent Behaviour? . 143 5.5 The Structure of the Vacuum . 143 5.6 Modelling Quantum Behaviour . 144 5.6.1 Quantum State Di®usion and Spontaneous Localisation Theories . 145 5.6.2 Towards an Operational and Realistic Framework . 153 Chapter 6 Quantum Field Theoretic Descriptions of Emergent Phenomena 156 6.1 Generating Complex Emergent Behaviour . 156 6.1.1 Generating Interaction among Emergent Phenomena . 157 6.1.2 Generating Hierarchical Behaviour . 157 6.2 The Recursive Gauge Principle (RGP) . 158 6.3 An Example System | Solitons in Cellular Automata . 161 6.4 Emergent Behaviour in Process Physics . 165 6.4.1 QSD in Process Physics . 169 6.4.2 The Structure of Space, Time and Matter . 169 6.4.3 Nambu{Goldstone Modes . 170 6.4.4 Relativity in Process Physics . 171 6.4.5 Gravity in Process Physics . 175 6.4.6 Thermodynamics in Process Physics . 177 6.4.7 Observational Emergence in Process Physics . 178 6.5 Proof of Concept | Sympatric Speciation . 179 6.6 Further Work | Biological Development . 184 Chapter 7 Conclusions: An Emergent Methodology 186 7.1 De¯ning Emergence . 186 7.2 De¯ning Complexity . 187 7.2.1 Modelling the Contexts of Emergent Behaviour . 188 7.2.2 Moving Beyond an Object-Based Methodology . 189 7.2.3 Reductive Paradigms? . 191 vii 7.3 Contextuality and Observer Dependence . 191 7.4 In Conclusion . 192 Appendix A Notation 193 A.1 Observational Emergence . 193 A.2 Quantum Mechanics . 193 A.3 Quantum Field Theory . 194 A.4 Process Physics . 194 A.4.1 Low level relational model . 194 A.4.2 Quantum Homotopic Field Theory (QHFT) . 194 A.4.3 Gravity Model . 195 A.4.4 Model of Sympatric Speciation . 195 A.5 Abbreviations used in the text . 195 Appendix B It^o calculus | a brief summary 196 B.1 The Markov property . 196 B.2 Wiener processes . 196 B.3 It^o's theorem . 197 Appendix C Generalized Master Equations 198 C.1 Solution by Generalized Master Equations . 198 C.2 A derivation of the Quantum State Di®usion equation . 202 References 207 viii List of Tables 2.1 The di®erent classes of evolutionary activity. 36 3.1 The di®erences between a scalar and a speci¯cation hierarchy as de¯ned.
Recommended publications
  • Renewable Energy Partnerships in Development Cooperation: Towards a Relational Theory of Technical Assistance
    Sustainability Research Institute SCHOOL OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Renewable energy partnerships in development cooperation: Towards a relational theory of technical assistance Lena J. Kruckenberg January 2015 Sustainability Research Institute Paper No. 77 Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No. 200 SRI PAPERS SRI Papers (Online) ISSN 1753-1330 A later version of this paper is forthcoming in Energy Policy: Kruckenberg, L.J., 2015. Renewable energy partnerships in development cooperation: Towards a relational understanding of technical assistance. Energy Policy, 77, 11–20. Doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.004 First published in 2015 by the Sustainability Research Institute (SRI) Sustainability Research Institute (SRI), School of Earth and Environment, The University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)113 3436461 Fax: +44 (0)113 3436716 Email: [email protected] Web-site: http://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/sri About the Sustainability Research Institute The Sustainability Research Institute conducts internationally recognised, academically excellent and problem-oriented interdisciplinary research and teaching on environmental, social and economic aspects of sustainability. We draw on various social and natural science disciplines, including ecological economics, environmental economics, political science, policy studies, development studies, business and management, geography, sociology, science and technology studies, ecology, environmental science and soil science in our work. The Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) brings together some of the world's leading researchers on climate change economics and policy, from many different disciplines. It was established in 2008 and its first phase ended on 30 September 2013. Its second phase commenced on 1 October 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Temperature Superconductivity
    SOLITON AND BISOLITON MODEL FOR PAIRING MECHANISM OF HIGH - TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTIVITY Samnao Phatisena* Received: Nov 3, 2005; Revised: Jun 12, 2006; Accepted: Jun 19, 2006 Abstract Soliton is a nonlinear solitary wave moving without energy loss and without changing its form and velocity. It has particlelike properties. The extraordinary stability of solitons is due to the mutual compensation of two phenomena, dispersion and nonlinearity. Solitons can be paired in a singlet state called bisoliton due to the interaction with local chain deformation created by them. Bisolitons are Bose particles and when their concentration is higher or lower than some critical values they can move without resistance. The bisoliton model can be applied for a pairing mechanism in cuprate superconductors due to their layered structure and the relatively small density of charge carriers. Cooper pairs breaking is a result of a paramagnetic effect and the Landau diamagnetic effect. The influence of magnetic impurities and the Meissner effect on cuprate superconductor based on the concepts of the bisoliton model are discussed. Keywords: Soliton, bisoliton, pairing mechanism, cuprate superconductors, paramagnetic effect, diamagnetic effect, Meissner effect Introduction The fascinating nonlinear wave structures known is exactly compensated by the reverse phenomenon, as solitary waves or solitons have become a namely, nonlinear self-compression of the wave subject of deeply interested for physicists in packet, and therefore the soliton propagates recent years. A soliton is a wave packet in which without spreading out and it conservs its shape. the wave field is localized in a limited (generally Thus, soliton is a nonspreading, nonlinear wave propagating) spatial region and is absent outside packet in which the phases and amplitudes of this region.
    [Show full text]
  • A 1 Case-PR/ }*Rciofft.;Is Report
    .A 1 case-PR/ }*rciofft.;is Report (a) This eruption site on Mauna Loa Volcano was the main source of the voluminous lavas that flowed two- thirds of the distance to the town of Hilo (20 km). In the interior of the lava fountains, the white-orange color indicates maximum temperatures of about 1120°C; deeper orange in both the fountains and flows reflects decreasing temperatures (<1100°C) at edges and the surface. (b) High winds swept the exposed ridges, and the filter cannister was changed in the shelter of a p^hoehoc (lava) ridge to protect the sample from gas contamination. (c) Because of the high temperatures and acid gases, special clothing and equipment was necessary to protect the eyes. nose, lungs, and skin. Safety features included military flight suits of nonflammable fabric, fuil-face respirators that are equipped with dual acidic gas filters (purple attachments), hard hats, heavy, thick-soled boots, and protective gloves. We used portable radios to keep in touch with the Hawaii Volcano Observatory, where the area's seismic activity was monitored continuously. (d) Spatter activity in the Pu'u O Vent during the January 1984 eruption of Kilauea Volcano. Magma visible in the circular conduit oscillated in a piston-like fashion; spatter was ejected to heights of 1 to 10 m. During this activity, we sampled gases continuously for 5 hours at the west edge. Cover photo: This aerial view of Kilauea Volcano was taken in April 1984 during overflights to collect gas samples from the plume. The bluish portion of the gas plume contained a far higher density of fine-grained scoria (ash).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Ontology of Spacetime: Substantivalism, Relationism, Eternalism, and Emergence
    Found Sci DOI 10.1007/s10699-015-9476-1 On the Ontology of Spacetime: Substantivalism, Relationism, Eternalism, and Emergence Gustavo E. Romero1 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015 Abstract I present a discussion of some issues in the ontology of spacetime. After a characterisation of the controversies among relationists, substantivalists, eternalists, and presentists, I offer a new argument for rejecting presentism, the doctrine that only present objects exist. Then, I outline and defend a form of spacetime realism that I call event substantivalism. I propose an ontological theory for the emergence of spacetime from more basic entities (timeless and spaceless ‘events’). Finally, I argue that a relational theory of pre-geometric entities can give rise to substantival spacetime in such a way that relationism and substantivalism are not necessarily opposed positions, but rather complementary. In an appendix I give axiomatic formulations of my ontological views. Keywords Ontology Á Physics Á Spacetime For there neither is nor will be anything else besides what is, since Fate has fettered it to be whole and changeless. Parmenides (Fragment 8. From the translation in Kirk et al.1983). 1 Introduction Discussions and controversies about the nature of space and time in Western thought can be traced to the early Pre-Socratic philosophers (Graham 2006; Jammer 2012; Romero 2012). The position of Aristotle, who understood time as a measure of motion, and its contrast with the Platonic view, shaped the ontological controversy of the Hellenistic period, the Late Antiquity, and even the Middle Ages (see Sorabji 1983). It was not, however, until the development of Newtonian physics and the Leibniz–Clarke corre- spondence (Leibniz and Clarke 2000), that what is now called relationism-substantivalism & Gustavo E.
    [Show full text]
  • Selftrapping, Biomolecules and Free Electron Lasers
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCL Discovery INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING JOURNAL OF PHYSICS: CONDENSED MATTER J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 (2003) V5–V9 PII: S0953-8984(03)61522-5 VIEWPOINT Selftrapping, biomolecules and free electron lasers Per-Anker Lindgård1,2 and A Marshall Stoneham3 1 Materials Research Department, Risø National Laboratory, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark 2 QUPCentre, Danish Technical University, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark 3 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6 BT, UK Received 1 April 2003 Published 28 April 2003 Online at stacks.iop.org/JPhysCM/15/V5 Forasolid-state physicist, the controlled movement of energy and charge are central phenomena. Novel materials have often pointed to new mechanisms: self-trapping in halides giving energy localization, the incoherent motion of small polarons in colossal magnetoresistance oxides, solitons in conducting polymers, magnetic polarons in magnetic semiconductors, the quantum motion of electrons in mesoscopic metals, the regimes of both coherent and incoherent quantum propagation of muons in solids, and so on. The issues of energy and charge transport are equally crucial in living matter, but are understood less well. How can the energy from light or chemical processes be moved around and used efficiently? The important paper by Austin et al (2003) in this special issue shows that new experimental tools, using the ultra short, tunable laser pulses from free electron lasers, open up the possibility of resolving outstanding problems in understanding the energy and charge processes which underpin life itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Considerations on Undistorted-Progressive X-Waves
    Brazilian Journal of Physics ISSN: 0103-9733 [email protected] Sociedade Brasileira de Física Brasil Mesquita, Marcus V.; Vasconcellos, Áurea R.; Luzzi, Roberto Considerations on undistorted-progressive X-Waves and davydov solitons, Fröhlich-Bose-Einstein condensation, and Cherenkov-like effect in biosystems Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 34, núm. 2A, june, 2004, pp. 489-503 Sociedade Brasileira de Física Sâo Paulo, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=46434227 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 34, no. 2A, June, 2004 489 Considerations on Undistorted-Progressive X-Waves and Davydov Solitons, Frohlich-Bose-Einstein¨ Condensation, and Cherenkov-like effect in Biosystems Marcus V. Mesquita,1 Aurea´ R. Vasconcellos,2 and Roberto Luzzi2 1. Instituto de F´ısica, Universidade Federal do Ceara,´ 60455-760, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil 2. Instituto de F´ısica ‘Gleb Wataghin’, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Unicamp, 13083-970 Campinas, SP, Brazil Received on 3 June, 2003 Research in ultrasonography has evidenced the propagation of a peculiar kind of excitation in fluids. Such excitation, dubbed a X-wave, has characteristics resembling that of a solitary-wave type. We reconsider the problem in a medium consisting of a biological material of the like of ®-helix proteins. It can be shown that in this case is expected an excitation of the Davydov’s solitary wave type, however strongly damped in normal conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Alwyn C. Scott
    the frontiers collection the frontiers collection Series Editors: A.C. Elitzur M.P. Silverman J. Tuszynski R. Vaas H.D. Zeh The books in this collection are devoted to challenging and open problems at the forefront of modern science, including related philosophical debates. In contrast to typical research monographs, however, they strive to present their topics in a manner accessible also to scientifically literate non-specialists wishing to gain insight into the deeper implications and fascinating questions involved. Taken as a whole, the series reflects the need for a fundamental and interdisciplinary approach to modern science. Furthermore, it is intended to encourage active scientists in all areas to ponder over important and perhaps controversial issues beyond their own speciality. Extending from quantum physics and relativity to entropy, consciousness and complex systems – the Frontiers Collection will inspire readers to push back the frontiers of their own knowledge. Other Recent Titles The Thermodynamic Machinery of Life By M. Kurzynski The Emerging Physics of Consciousness Edited by J. A. Tuszynski Weak Links Stabilizers of Complex Systems from Proteins to Social Networks By P. Csermely Quantum Mechanics at the Crossroads New Perspectives from History, Philosophy and Physics Edited by J. Evans, A.S. Thorndike Particle Metaphysics A Critical Account of Subatomic Reality By B. Falkenburg The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time By H.D. Zeh Asymmetry: The Foundation of Information By S.J. Muller Mindful Universe Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer By H. Stapp Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition By M. Schlosshauer For a complete list of titles in The Frontiers Collection, see back of book Alwyn C.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Social Processes of Leadership and Organizing
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Leadership Institute Faculty Publications Leadership Institute 12-2006 Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing Mary Uhl-Bien University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/leadershipfacpub Part of the Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Commons Uhl-Bien, Mary, "Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing" (2006). Leadership Institute Faculty Publications. 19. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/leadershipfacpub/19 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Leadership Institute at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Leadership Institute Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in The Leadership Quarterly 17:6 (December 2006), pp. 654-676: The Leadership Quarterly Yearly Review of Leadership; doi 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Used by permission. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10489843 Published online November 16, 2006. Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing Mary Uhl-Bien Department of Management University of Nebraska–Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68588 USA Abstract Relational leadership is a relatively new term in the leadership literature, and because of this, its meaning is open to interpretation. In the present article I describe two perspectives of relational leadership: an entity perspective that fo- cuses on identifying attributes of individuals as they engage in interpersonal relationships, and a relational perspec- tive that views leadership as a process of social construction through which certain understandings of leadership come about and are given privileged ontology.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Theory
    Chapter 1 Theory This chapter reviews the established models of mm-wave absorption in biological systems that are principally related to dielectric heating . Other mechanisms have been postulated where a portion of the energy is not thermalized but channelled into higher processes. A brief description of non-thermal absorption mechanisms, which must be considered conjectural, is also presented. In connection with the absorption mechanisms, a simple model of a prokaryotic cell is described. Features such as the cell membrane , bacterial chromosome and organelles are identified as are some important parameters relating to biological systems. The millimetre wave ( mm-wave ) range is part of the electromagnetic spectrum situated between the microwave and infrared ranges. It spans a frequency range extending from 30 to 300 GHz, which corresponds to an in-vacuo wavelength between 1.0 - 10 mm. This spectral region is also called “ Extremely High Frequency ” or EHF . Mm-wave photons possess less than the minimum energy required to remove an electron from an atom or molecule and are therefore non-ionising. 1.1 Biological systems All living organisms are subject to a background level of mm-wave radiation. The Earth radiates in the mm-wave spectral range. This emission has been exploited in Earth observation technologies, with passive radiometry . Organisms are also subject to solar exposure, although some frequency ranges are strongly attenuated by the atmosphere (see appendix A). The cell forms the basic structural and functional unit of all organisms and may exist as independent units of life or may form colonies or tissues as in higher plants and animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1106.4415V1 [Math.DG] 22 Jun 2011 R,Rno Udai Form
    JORDAN STRUCTURES IN MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS Radu IORDANESCU˘ 1 Institute of Mathematics of the Romanian Academy P.O.Box 1-764 014700 Bucharest, Romania E-mail: [email protected] FOREWORD The aim of this paper is to offer an overview of the most important applications of Jordan structures inside mathematics and also to physics, up- dated references being included. For a more detailed treatment of this topic see - especially - the recent book Iord˘anescu [364w], where sugestions for further developments are given through many open problems, comments and remarks pointed out throughout the text. Nowadays, mathematics becomes more and more nonassociative (see 1 § below), and my prediction is that in few years nonassociativity will govern mathematics and applied sciences. MSC 2010: 16T25, 17B60, 17C40, 17C50, 17C65, 17C90, 17D92, 35Q51, 35Q53, 44A12, 51A35, 51C05, 53C35, 81T05, 81T30, 92D10. Keywords: Jordan algebra, Jordan triple system, Jordan pair, JB-, ∗ ∗ ∗ arXiv:1106.4415v1 [math.DG] 22 Jun 2011 JB -, JBW-, JBW -, JH -algebra, Ricatti equation, Riemann space, symmet- ric space, R-space, octonion plane, projective plane, Barbilian space, Tzitzeica equation, quantum group, B¨acklund-Darboux transformation, Hopf algebra, Yang-Baxter equation, KP equation, Sato Grassmann manifold, genetic alge- bra, random quadratic form. 1The author was partially supported from the contract PN-II-ID-PCE 1188 517/2009. 2 CONTENTS 1. Jordan structures ................................. ....................2 § 2. Algebraic varieties (or manifolds) defined by Jordan pairs ............11 § 3. Jordan structures in analysis ....................... ..................19 § 4. Jordan structures in differential geometry . ...............39 § 5. Jordan algebras in ring geometries . ................59 § 6. Jordan algebras in mathematical biology and mathematical statistics .66 § 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology Assessment
    Master thesis Biology Assessment on the feasibility of anticipating Synthetic Biology Wietse Hage Under the supervision of dr. Y. Saghai and dr. M.A.J. MacLeod January 21, 2021 ”It is not down on any map; true places never are.” Moby-Dick, or, the Whale Herman Melville MSc Philosophy of Science, Technology and Society - PSTS Faculty of Behavioural, Management, and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands Acknowledgements Arnhem, January 21, 2021 What a fascinating journey we’ve had. First and foremost, I would like to thank Yashar Saghai. During the one and a half year this thesis took to write, Yashar and I met almost every two weeks! This adds up to 40 plus meet- ings, not including our trip to the Anticipation conference in Oslo. It is hard for me to find words that convey my gratitude towards you Yashar: I hope that my future work shows the influence you had on me, both as a philosopher and a writer. The second person who played a crucial part lifting this thesis up to the level it standstoday is Miles MacLeod. Having someone with your background take a critical look at my work is a true gift: thank you for the insightful comments and the time you took to discuss Robert Rosen’s controversial ideas with me. Another individual who deserves mentioning is Virgil Rerimassie, who took the time to sit down over coffee to explain his work in his own words. I would like to thank my girlfriend Iris, who during all of these months remained patient, caring and loving; thank you for sticking by my side piertje, definitely during my grumpier phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationalism and (General) Relativistic Physics Relationalism and (General) Relativistic Physics
    Relationalism and (General) Relativistic Physics Relationalism and (General) Relativistic Physics Two distinct issues: To what extent is GR a relationalist theory? Can we construct a Leibnizian relational theory with a particle ontology, which is as empirically adequate as GR? General Relativity Einstein’s field equations: G[g] = κT[g; Φ]: G[g] is the Einstein’s tensor. It encodes information about the 4-dimensional spacetime geometry. T[g; Φ] is the stress-energy tensor. It encodes information about the distribution of a matter field Φ in spacetime. A model of GR is a solution of Einstein’s field equation. It is a triple < M; g; T >. General Relativity Einstein’s field equations: G[g] = κT[g; Φ]: Space acts on matter, telling it how to move. In turn, matter reacts back on space, telling it how to curve. (C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne, J.A. Wheeler - Gravitation. Freeman & Co., 1973, p.5) General Relativity It is commonly said that GR unifies gravity and physical geometry. GR describes gravitational forces as curvature effects of spacetime geometry. In this (weak) sense, GR succeeds in “geometrizing away” gravity. However, there is no straightforward reduction here: “spacetime” and “gravitational field” are two ways to refer to the same entity. Two Senses of “Relationalism” in General Relativity 1 Spatiotemporal facts fully reducible to material facts (eliminative relationalism). 2 Spatiotemporal facts fully reducible to facts about spatiotemporal relations instantiated by material relata (non-eliminative relationalism). Against Relationalism in GR GR admits cosmological models of the form < M; g; 0 >, which means that it makes physical sense in GR to think about a universe totally deprived of matter, where still there is spacetime.
    [Show full text]