Contractor Summary of Award Projects for the Year: West Virginia
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
West Virginia Trail Inventory
West Virginia Trail Inventory Trail report summarized by county, prepared by the West Virginia GIS Technical Center updated 9/24/2014 County Name Trail Name Management Area Managing Organization Length Source (mi.) Date Barbour American Discovery American Discovery Trail 33.7 2009 Trail Society Barbour Brickhouse Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.55 2013 Barbour Brickhouse Spur Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 2.73 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Shortcut Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.46 2013 Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.02 2013 Connector Barbour Double Dip Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.2 2013 Barbour Hospital Loop Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.29 2013 Barbour Indian Burial Ground Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Kid's Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.4 2011 Resources Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.07 2011 Access Resources Barbour Prologue Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.63 2013 Barbour River Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.26 2013 Barbour Rock Cliff Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.21 2011 Resources Barbour Rock Pinch Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.51 2013 Barbour Short course Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.1 2013 Barbour -
Monongahela National Forest
Monongahela National Forest Administrative Correction 15 August 12, 2010 Changes to Management Prescription 8.2 Areas Due to New Information Under the 2000 Planning Rule (36 CFR 219.31), the following administrative corrections and additions may be made at any time, are not plan amendments or revisions, and do not require public notice or the preparation of an environmental document under Forest Service NEPA procedures: (1) Corrections and updates of data and maps; (2) Updates to activity lists and schedules as required by § 219.30(d)(1)-(6); (3) Corrections of typographical errors or other non-substantive changes; and (4) Changes in monitoring methods other than those required in a monitoring strategy. The following corrections are a result of new information from the USDI National Park Service about National Natural Landmarks (NNLs) on the Monongahela National Forest (MNF). During a recent visit to inspect NNLs on the MNF, Carolyn Davis of the NPS compared her list of NNLs on the Forest to the Forest Ecologist’s list, and two discrepancies were found. First, the Falls of Hills Creek area was not on the NPS list as an NNL. Second, the Germany Valley Karst Area was on the NPS list but not on the MNF list of NNLs. Therefore, the following administrative corrections are being made to NNLs, which are identified as Management Prescription 8.2 in the MNF Forest Plan. All acreage figures have been rounded off to the nearest 10 acres. CORRECTIONS Forest Plan Chapter III, page III-40 (originally page III-46) MP 8.0 Special Area Table, seventh -
Backpacking: Bird Knob
1 © 1999 Troy R. Hayes. All rights reserved. Preface As a new Scoutmaster, I wanted to take my troop on different kinds of adventure. But each trip took a tremendous amount of preparation to discover what the possibilities were, to investigate them, to pick one, and finally make the detailed arrangements. In some cases I even made a reconnaissance trip in advance in order to make sure the trip worked. The Pathfinder is an attempt to make this process easier. A vigorous outdoor program is a key element in Boy Scouting. The trips described in these pages range from those achievable by eleven year olds to those intended for fourteen and up (high adventure). And remember what the Irish say: The weather determines not whether you go, but what clothing you should wear. My Scouts have camped in ice, snow, rain, and heat. The most memorable trips were the ones with "bad" weather. That's when character building best occurs. Troy Hayes Warrenton, VA [Preface revised 3-10-2011] 2 Contents Backpacking Bird Knob................................................................... 5 Bull Run - Occoquan Trail.......................................... 7 Corbin/Nicholson Hollow............................................ 9 Dolly Sods (2 day trip)............................................... 11 Dolly Sods (3 day trip)............................................... 13 Otter Creek Wilderness............................................. 15 Saint Mary's Trail ................................................ ..... 17 Sherando Lake ....................................................... -
By Kenneth J. Englund and Wayne R. Sigleo, U.S. Geological Survey and Paul T
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP MF-1271-E PAMPHLET MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE CHEAT MOUNTAIN ROADLESS AREA, RANDOLPH COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA By Kenneth J. Englund and Wayne R. Sigleo, U.S. Geological Survey and Paul T. Behum and Richard W. Hammack, U.S. Bureau of Mines 1983 Studies Related To Wilderness Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and related acts, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a mineral survey of the Cheat Mountain Roadless Area, Monongahela National Forest, Randolph County, West Virginia. The area was classified as a further planning area during the Second Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE n) by the U.S. Forest Service, January 1979. MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL SUMMARY STATEMENT The Cheat Mountain Roadless Area contains approximately 7,720 acres in the Monongahela National Forest, Randolph County, W. Va. All the surface rights are owned by the U.S. -
Gazetteer of West Virginia
Bulletin No. 233 Series F, Geography, 41 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOU A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA I-IEISTRY G-AN3STETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1904 A» cl O a 3. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTEKIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Washington, D. C. , March 9, 190Jh SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for publication as a bulletin, a gazetteer of West Virginia! Very respectfully, HENRY GANNETT, Geogwvpher. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 3 A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA. HENRY GANNETT. DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE. The State of West Virginia was cut off from Virginia during the civil war and was admitted to the Union on June 19, 1863. As orig inally constituted it consisted of 48 counties; subsequently, in 1866, it was enlarged by the addition -of two counties, Berkeley and Jeffer son, which were also detached from Virginia. The boundaries of the State are in the highest degree irregular. Starting at Potomac River at Harpers Ferry,' the line follows the south bank of the Potomac to the Fairfax Stone, which was set to mark the headwaters of the North Branch of Potomac River; from this stone the line runs due north to Mason and Dixon's line, i. e., the southern boundary of Pennsylvania; thence it follows this line west to the southwest corner of that State, in approximate latitude 39° 43i' and longitude 80° 31', and from that corner north along the western boundary of Pennsylvania until the line intersects Ohio River; from this point the boundary runs southwest down the Ohio, on the northwestern bank, to the mouth of Big Sandy River. -
Cheat Mountain Salamander Recovery Plan
CHEAT MOUNTAIN SALAMANDER (Plethodon neftiigi) RECOVERY PLAN Region Five U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service CHEAT MOUNTAIN SALAMANDER (Plethodon nettingi) RECOVERY PLAN Prepared by: Thomas K. Pauley Department of Biological Sciences Marshall University Huntington, WV 25755 for: Northeast Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Newton Corner, MA 02158 Approved: Regional Director, N east Regi U.S. Fish and WildV Service Date: * * * This recovery plan delineates reasonable actions needed to recover and/or protect the threatened Cheat Mountain Salamander. The plan does not necessarily represent the views or official position of any particular individuals or agencies involved in plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The proposals in this plan are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Objectives will be attained and funds expended contingent upon appropriations, priorities, and other budgetary constraints. Literature citations should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1991. Cheat Mountain Salamander Recovery Plan. Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 35 pp. Additional copies may be purchased from: Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 301-492-6403 or 1-800-582-3421 Fees vary according to number of pages. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cheat Mountain Salamander Recovery Plan Current Species Status: The Cheat Mountain salamander is currently known to exist at 68 sites within an approximately 700 square-mile area in West Virginia. Most of these populations are small, with less than ten salamanders observed. Although historical levels are not known, it is likely that the current population represents oniy a small portion of the species’ former distribution and population levels. -
Old Growth in the East, a Survey
Old Growth in the East (Rev. Ed.) Old Growth in the East A Survey Revised edition Mary Byrd Davis Appalachia-Science in the Public Interest Mt. Vernon, Kentucky Old Growth in the East (Rev. Ed.) Old Growth in the East: A Survey. Revised edition by Mary Byrd Davis Published by Appalachia-Science in the Public Interest (ASPI, 50 Lair Street, Mount Vernon, KY 40456) on behalf of the Eastern Old-Growth Clearinghouse (POB 131, Georgetown, KY 40324). ASPI is a non-profit organization that makes science and technology responsive to the needs of low-income people in central Appalachia. The Eastern Old-Growth Clearinghouse furthers knowledge about and preservation of old growth in the eastern United States. Its educational means include the Web site www.old-growth.org . First edition: Copyright © 1993 by the Cenozoic Society Revised edition: Copyright © 2003 by Mary Byrd Davis All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without written permission from the author. ISBN 1-878721-04-06 Edited by John Davis. Design by Carol Short and Sammy Short, based on the design of the first edition by Tom Butler Cover illustration by William Crook Jr. Old Growth in the East (Rev. Ed.) To the memory of Toutouque, companion to the Wild Earthlings Old Growth in the East (Rev. Ed.) C O N T E N T S Introduction 5 Northeast Connecticut 7 Maine 9 Massachusetts 19 New Hampshire 24 New Jersey 32 New York 36 Pennsylvania 52 Rhode Island 63 Vermont 65 Southeast Alabama 70 Delaware 76 Florida 78 Georgia 91 Maryland 99 Mississippi 103 North Carolina 110 South Carolina 128 Tennessee 136 Virginia 146 Ohio Valley Indiana 156 Kentucky 162 Ohio 168 West Virginia 175 Southern Midwest Arkansas 179 Kansas 187 Louisiana 189 Missouri 199 Oklahoma 207 Texas 211 Northern Midwest Illinois 218 Iowa 225 Michigan 227 Minnesota 237 Wisconsin 248 Appendix: Species Lis t 266 Old Growth in the East (Rev. -
The West Virginia Scenic Trails Association's First 40
“A PATH IN THE WOODS”: THE WEST VIRGINIA SCENIC TRAILS ASSOCIATION’S FIRST 40 YEARS Research and recollections by Doug Wood, December 2020. Without the assistance of Bob Tabor, Nick Lozano, Charlie Dundas, Carolyn Welcker, Shirley Schweizer, Bruce Bond, and Arthur Foley, this compilation of memories would be sparse and suspect. Watch for updated versions in the future. In 1958, members of Explorer Scout Post 4, sponsored by Kanawha Presbyterian Church in Charleston, West Virginia was backpacking on the Appalachian Trail in the Great Smoky Mountains. The Post Advisor, Doug McGrew was an inspiring leader of young men. McGrew was a Union Carbide chemical engineer. One Explorer Scout in particular, remembers the positive influence McGrew had on his charges. Nicolas (correct spelling) B. Lozano, who was 15 years old at the time and is now a retired insurance executive, refers to his former Post Advisor as “the Grandfather of the Allegheny Trail.” According to Lozano, McGrew’s leadership inspired his Scouts and led them into life-changing outdoor experiences, such as that backpack trip in 1958. Nick remembers thinking upon his return home to West Virginia after that trip, “Why should we West Virginia scouts have to travel to other states to experience the adventure of long-distance backpacking? We have the Allegheny Mountains with all their natural splendor and wildness to rival the Great Smoky Mountains. Why can’t we have a trail like the Appalachian Trail running through the mountains of The Mountain State?” So, Doug McGrew is the “Grandfather” of the Allegheny Trail, because Nick Lozano is one of the “Founding Fathers” of the Allegheny Trail. -
Proceedings from the Conference on the Ecology and Management of High-Elevation Forests in the Central and Southern Appalachian Mountains
United States Department of Agriculture Proceedings from the Conference Forest Service on the Ecology and Management Northern Research Station of High-Elevation Forests in the General Technical Report NRS-P-64 Central and Southern Appalachian Mountains Abstract Proceedings of the Conference on the Ecology and Management of High-Elevation Forests in the Central and Southern Appalachian Mountains held May 14-15, 2009, at Snowshoe Mountain Resort, near Slatyfork, WV. The proceedings includes 18 peer-reviewed papers and 40 abstracts pertaining to acid deposition and nutrient cycling, ecological classification, forest dynamics, avifauna, wildlife and fisheries, forests pests, climate change, old-growth forest structure, and regeneration, and restoration. The findings and conclusions of each article in this publication are those of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service. All articles were received in digital format and were edited for uniform type and style. Each author is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her paper. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. Cover photo: An old-growth red spruce-northern hardwood forest as seen from Gaudineer Scenic Area on the Monongahela National Forest. Photo used with permission by David Ede, U.S. Forest Service, Monongahela National Forest. -
Monongahela National Forest
Monongahela National Forest United States Department of Final Agriculture Environmental Impact Statement Forest Service Appendices A-H September 2006 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its program and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202)720- 2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202)720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal Opportunity provider and employer. Final Environmental Impact Statement Appendices A-H Table of Contents Page No. Appendix A – Public Involvement ............................................................................ A-1 Appendix B – Analysis Processes ..............................................................................B-1 Appendix C – Roadless Area Inventory and Wilderness Evaluation.........................C-1 Appendix D – Terrestrial Species Viability Evaluations........................................... D-1 Appendix E – Aquatic Species Viability....................................................................E-1 Appendix F – References........................................................................................... -
Randolph County Trails by Usage Type
Randolph County Trails By Usage Type Trail Name Land Manager Allegheny Highlands Highlands Trail Foundation 24 Y Y NNY Y Y Y NNNN Allegheny Mountain Trail MNF - Potomac District - 12 Y Y NNNNNNNNNN Spruce Knob National Recreation Area Back Ridge MNF - Potomac District - 4.6 Y Y NNNNNNNNNN Spruce Knob National Recreation Area Balsam MNF - Greenbrier District - Y Y NNNNNNNNNN Shavers Mountain Area Bear Hunter MNF - Potomac District - 1 Y Y NNNNNNNNNN Spruce Knob National Recreation Area Bee MNF - Potomac District - 1.6 Y Y NNNNNNNNNN Spruce Knob National Recreation Area Beulah MNF - Greenbrier District - 4.3 Y Y NNNNNNNNNN Middle Mountain Area Big Run MNF - Potomac District - 3.1 Y Y NNNNNNNNNN Spruce Knob National Recreation Area Boars Nest MNF - Potomac District - 2.7 Y Y NNNNY NNNNN Flatrock and Roaring Plains Area Camp Five MNF - Greenbrier District - 1.6 Y Y NNNNNNNNNN Middle Mountain Area Chestnut Ridge MNF - Greenbrier District - 5.5 Y Y NNNNNNNNNN Cheat Mountain Area Clay Run Kumbrabow State Forest 0.8 Y NNNNNNNNNNN Couch Ridge MNF - Greenbrier District - 2.9 Y Y NNNNNNNNNN Cheat Mountain Area County Line MNF - Greenbrier District - 4.1 Y Y NNNNNNNNNN Middle Mountain Area Elza MNF - Potomac District - 2 Y Y NNNNNNNNNN Spruce Knob National Recreation Area Page 1 of 5 Randolph County Trails By Usage Type Trail Name Land Manager Flatrock Run MNF - Potomac District - 5.1 Y Y NNNNY NNNNN Flatrock and Roaring Plains Area Forks MNF - Greenbrier District - 1.1 Y Y NNNNNNNNNN Middle Mountain Area Gatewood MNF - Potomac District - 2 Y N Y -
The Breeding Warblers of the Central Allegheny Mountain Region
December, 1940 THE WILSON BULLETIN 249 Vol. 52. No. 4 THE BREEDING WARBLERS OF THE CENTRAL ALLEGHENY MOUNTAIN REGION BY MAURICE BROOKS OUNTAIN masses, and the interpretation of their plant and M animal life, present a standing challenge to the biologist. The Appalachian mountain system, being of moderate elevation and located in mid-latitude regions, does not exhibit the striking con- trasts to be found in high altitude mountains of more southern regions, where a climb of a few miles may take the observer from the tropical to the arctic-alpine; nevertheless our eastern ranges have been a haven of refuge for land forms since Palaeozoic times and have their fascinating problems of modern, as well as ancient, natural history. THE AREA The area with which this paper deals is centered roughly between the northern and southern extremities of the Appalachian system, and embraces the mountainous poition of western Maryland, all of West Virginia west of the Shenandoah valley, and portions of Frederick, Shenandoah, Rockingham, Augusta, Highland, Bath, Alleghany,r Craig, Giles, Bland, and Tazewell counties, Virginia. Thus it includes all of the Allegheny ridges between the Great Valley of Virginia and the Ohio River, from the Pennsylvania border on the north to the southern extremity of West Virginia. The “Ridge and Valley province” (of F enneman, 1938) lying directly east of this territory, and the high Blue Ridge peaks of southwestern Virginia are excluded, since it is felt that their biotic conditions differ in a number of essentials from those of the area under consideration. From the ornithological standpoint, the region is remarkably homogeneous,, although the boundaries are somewhat arbitrary.