Genomic Characterization in Triple-Negative Primary Myelofibrosis and Other Myeloid Neoplasms with Bone Marrow Fibrosis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Genomic Characterization in Triple-Negative Primary Myelofibrosis and Other Myeloid Neoplasms with Bone Marrow Fibrosis Annals of Hematology (2019) 98:2319–2328 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-019-03766-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Genomic characterization in triple-negative primary myelofibrosis and other myeloid neoplasms with bone marrow fibrosis Alberto Alvarez-Larrán1 & Mónica López-Guerra2,3 & María Rozman2 & Juan-Gonzalo Correa1 & Juan Carlos Hernández-Boluda4 & Mar Tormo4 & Daniel Martínez2 & Iván Martín4 & Dolors Colomer2,3 & Jordi Esteve1 & Francisco Cervantes1 Received: 3 June 2019 /Accepted: 20 July 2019 /Published online: 8 August 2019 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Triple-negative primary myelofibrosis (TN-PMF) and other myeloid neoplasms with associated bone marrow fibrosis such as the myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS-F) or the myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN-F) are rare entities, often difficult to distinguish from each other. Thirty-four patients previously diagnosed with TN-PMF (n = 14), MDS-F (n = 18), or MDS/MPN-F (n = 2) were included in the present study. After central revision of the bone marrow histology, diagnoses according to the 2016-WHO classification were TN-PMF (n = 6), MDS-F (n =19),andMDS/MPN-F(n = 9), with TN-PMF genotype representing only 4% of a cohort of 141 molecularly annotated PMF. Genomic classification according to next- generation sequencing and cytogenetic study was performed in 28 cases. Median number of mutations was 4 (range 1–7) in cases with TP53 disruption/aneuploidy or with chromatin-spliceosome mutations versus 1 mutation (range 0–2) in other molec- ular subgroups (p < 0.0001). The number of mutations and the molecular classification were better than PMF and MDS con- ventional scoring systems to predict survival and progression to acute leukemia. In conclusion, TN-PMF is an uncommon entity when the 2016 WHO criteria are strictly applied. Genomic classification may help in the prognostic assessment of patients with myeloid neoplasms with bone marrow fibrosis. Keywords Primary myelofibrosis . Myelodysplastic syndromes . Diagnosis . Prognosis . Genomic classification Introduction Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is the less frequent of the classic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and the one with the worst prognosis, with an estimated median survival around Mónica López-Guerra and María Rozman contributed equally to this 6 years in contemporary series [1–4]. The majority of PMF work. patients have mutations in JAK2V617F, CALR,orMPL genes. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article However, up to 10% of them are negative for these mutations, (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-019-03766-z) contains supplementary with these triple-negative PMF (TN-PMF) patients showing a material, which is available to authorized users. more unfavorable prognosis [2–4]. In such cases, the absence * Alberto Alvarez-Larrán of a driver mutation can often complicate their distinction [email protected] from other myeloid neoplasms with associated bone marrow fibrosis. Myelodysplastic syndrome with associated fibrosis (MDS- 1 Hematology Department, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain F) represents 10–20% of MDS and, despite not being recog- nized as a separate entity, it is associated with an unfavorable 2 Hematopathology Section, Pathology Department, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain outcome [5– 7]. In addition, myelodysplastic/ myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) are rare entities 3 CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain 4 sharing clinical and morphological features with MDS and Hematology Department, Hospital Clínico-INCLIVA, MPN and including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia Valencia, Spain 2320 Ann Hematol (2019) 98:2319–2328 (CMML), atypical BCR-ABL1-negative chronic myeloid leu- paratrabecular localization, megakaryocyte size (small kemia (aCML), MDS/MPN with ring sideroblasts and and/or giant), and nuclear features, including bulbous thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T), and MDS/MPN unclas- morphology, hypolobulation with disperse nuclei, sified (MDS/MPN-U) [1]. In all these entities, if bone marrow hyperlobulation (stag horn-like), and hyperchromatism, fibrosis is present, differential diagnosis with TN-PMF is were also evaluated. Taking into consideration the challenging. above-mentioned features, all cases were finally classified It has recently been shown that a significant proportion according to the current WHO criteria [1]. of patients with MDS and MPN have mutations in a large Twenty-seven cases with available samples for NGS variety of genes associated with myeloid neoplasms [8, study were analyzed. Targeted NGS was performed using 9]. In addition, the presence of mutations in certain genes the Sophia Genetics Myeloid Tumor Solution Panel in- and the number of mutated genes has been associated with cluding the following genes: ABL1, ASXL1, BRAF, a more unfavorable prognosis in both MDS and PMF CALR, CBL, CEBPA, CSF3R, CSNK1A1, DNMT3A, [8–13]. ETV6, EZH2, FLT3, HRAS, IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, KIT, In the present study, we have characterized by next- KMT2A, KRAS, MPL, NPM1, NRAS, PTPN11, RUNX1, generation sequencing (NGS) techniques a cohort of patients SETBP1, SF3B1, SRSF2, TET2, TP53, U2AF1, U2AF2, homogeneously diagnosed with TN-PMF, MDS-F, or MDS/ WT1,andZRSR2. Libraries were sequenced 2 × 300 bp MPN-F according to the 2016 WHO criteria. The aim of the on an Illumina MiSeq. Sequencing data were analyzed study was to evaluate if mutations detected by NGS can help using the commercial software Sophia DDM v4.4 in establishing a definite diagnosis among these entities or (Sophia Genetics). Only variants categorized as highly refining the prognostic assessment of the patients. or potentially pathogenic by Sophia software were consid- ered. The minimum variant allele frequency (VAF) con- sidered was 2%. Synonymous, intronic, and polymorphic Patients and methods variants were discarded. Additionally, selected variants were reviewed in COSMIC and ClinVar databases to se- A search for TN-PMF and other chronic myeloid neoplasms lect clinically relevant mutations. with bone marrow fibrosis was performed in two Spanish Genomic classification combining cytogenetics and institutions. Cases with CMML, aCML, MDS/MPN-RS-T, NGS studies was performed as reported by Grinfeld and MDS with excess blasts type-2 were excluded. Initial et al. For such purpose, patients were hierarchically allo- data, including the main clinical, hematological, and cytoge- cated into eight molecular subgroups as follows: group 1: netic features, as well as the therapies administered during TP53 disruption or aneuploidy (TP53 mutation, follow-up, transformation to acute leukemia, and the causes Chr17pLOH or Chr5-/Chr5q-), group 2: ≥ 1 chromatin of death were collected. or spliceosome mutation (EZH2, IDH1, IDH2, ASXL1, Bone marrow biopsies were performed at diagnosis in PHF6, CUX1, ZRSR2, SRSF2, U2AF1, KRAS, NRAS, all cases. Hematoxylin/eosin and reticulin stained slides GNAS, CBL, Chr7/7qLOH, Chr4q/LOH, RUNX1, and CD34 immunostaining when available of formalin- STAG2,andBCOR), group 3: CALR mutation, group 4: fixed or Bouin’s solution fixed, paraffin embedded tre- MPL mutation, group 5: homozygous JAK2 mutation, phine biopsies were centrally reviewed by two expert group 6: heterozygous JAK2 mutation, group 7: myeloid hematopathologists. The review was performed blindly neoplasm with other driver mutation, and group 8: mye- without knowledge of age, clinical symptoms, original loid neoplasm with no known driver mutation [9]. diagnosis, or gene mutational status. Histological features The clinical and biological data at diagnosis, the cyto- assessed were cellularity (measured as percentage), pres- genetic findings, and the results from NGS analysis were ence of lymphoid aggregates (yes or no), granulocytic included in the statistical analysis. Comparisons among precursors (increased, normal or decreased, left shifted), diagnostic groups were performed after central review of erythrocytic precursors (increased, normal or decreased, bone marrow histology. The prognostic group was calcu- left shifted, megaloblastoid changes), myeloid/erythroid lated according to the International Prognostic Scoring ratio (increased, normal or decreased), presence of sinu- Systems (IPSS) designed for PMF [15]andMDS[16], soidal hyperplasia (yes or no), presence of intrasinusoidal respectively. The probabilities of survival and progression hematopoiesis (yes or no), and grade of reticulin fibrosis to acute leukemia were estimated by the Kaplan Meier according to the European Consensus Grading system method using the log rank test for comparisons. (ranging from MF-0 to MF-3) [14]. An extensive quanti- Informed consent for the scientific use of the patients’ fication and description of the morphology and distribu- clinico-hematological data and biological samples was ob- tion of the megakaryocytes was performed. Presence of tained, and the study was approved by the Ethics dense and loose clusters of megakaryocytes, Committee of the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona. Ann Hematol (2019) 98:2319–2328 2321 Table 1 Main clinical and hematological characteristics at TN-PMF MDS-F MDS/MPN-U-F P value diagnosis in 34 patients with N =6 N =19 N =9 myeloid neoplasms with bone marrow fibrosis Age, year* 61 (48–78) 64 (35–80) 65 (42–79) ns Male sex, n (%) 3 (50) 12 (63) 8 (89) ns Palpable spleen, n (%) 3/6 (50) 6/18 (33) 8/9 (89) 0.02 WBC count, × 109/L* 10.1 (3.8–19) 3 (0.3–11.4) 15.4 (5.1–69) < 0.001 Hemoglobin, g/L* 88 (78–144) 88 (69–140) 110 (50–140) ns Platelets, × 109/L* 241 (26–600) 85 (4–465)
Recommended publications
  • Updates in Mastocytosis
    Updates in Mastocytosis Tryptase PD-L1 Tracy I. George, M.D. Professor of Pathology 1 Disclosure: Tracy George, M.D. Research Support / Grants None Stock/Equity (any amount) None Consulting Blueprint Medicines Novartis Employment ARUP Laboratories Speakers Bureau / Honoraria None Other None Outline • Classification • Advanced mastocytosis • A case report • Clinical trials • Other potential therapies Outline • Classification • Advanced mastocytosis • A case report • Clinical trials • Other potential therapies Mastocytosis symposium and consensus meeting on classification and diagnostic criteria for mastocytosis Boston, October 25-28, 2012 2008 WHO Classification Scheme for Myeloid Neoplasms Acute Myeloid Leukemia Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia Myelodysplastic Syndromes MDS/MPN, unclassifiable Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia MDS/MPN Polycythemia Vera Essential Thrombocythemia Primary Myelofibrosis Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia, NOS Hypereosinophilic Syndrome Mast Cell Disease MPNs, unclassifiable Myeloid or lymphoid neoplasms Myeloid neoplasms associated with PDGFRA rearrangement associated with eosinophilia and Myeloid neoplasms associated with PDGFRB abnormalities of PDGFRA, rearrangement PDGFRB, or FGFR1 Myeloid neoplasms associated with FGFR1 rearrangement (EMS) 2017 WHO Classification Scheme for Myeloid Neoplasms Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Acute Myeloid Leukemia Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Juvenile Myelomonocytic
    [Show full text]
  • Mutation Analysis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms AHS - M2101
    Corporate Medical Policy Mutation Analysis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms AHS - M2101 File Name: mutation_analysis_in_myeloproliferative_neoplasms Origination: 1/1/2019 Last CAP review: 8/2021 Next CAP review: 8/2022 Last Review: 8/2021 Description of Procedure or Service Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of clonal disorders characterized by overproduction of one or more differentiated myeloid lineages (Grinfeld, Nangalia, & Green, 2017). These include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The majority of MPN result from somatic mutations in the 3 driver genes, JAK2, CALR, and MPL, which represent major diagnostic criteria in combination with hematologic and morphological abnormalities (Rumi & Cazzola, 2017). Related Policies: BCR-ABL 1 Testing for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia AHS-M2027 ***Note: This Medical Policy is complex and technical. For questions concerning the technical language and/or specific clinical indications for its use, please consult your physician. Policy BCBSNC will provide coverage for mutation analysis in myeloproliferative neoplasms when it is determined to be medically necessary because the medical criteria and guidelines shown below are met. Benefits Application This medical policy relates only to the services or supplies described herein. Please refer to the Member's Benefit Booklet for availability of benefits. Member's benefits may vary according to benefit design; therefore member benefit language should be reviewed before applying the terms of this medical policy. When Mutation Analysis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms is covered 1. JAK2, CALR or MPL mutation testing is considered medically necessary for the diagnosis of patients presenting with clinical, laboratory, or pathological findings suggesting classic forms of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), that is, polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), or primary myelofibrosis (PMF) when ordered by a hematology and/or oncology specialist in the following situations: A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clinical Management of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Eric Padron, MD, Rami Komrokji, and Alan F
    The Clinical Management of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Eric Padron, MD, Rami Komrokji, and Alan F. List, MD Dr Padron is an assistant member, Dr Abstract: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is an Komrokji is an associate member, and Dr aggressive malignancy characterized by peripheral monocytosis List is a senior member in the Department and ineffective hematopoiesis. It has been historically classified of Malignant Hematology at the H. Lee as a subtype of the myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) but was Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute in Tampa, Florida. recently demonstrated to be a distinct entity with a distinct natu- ral history. Nonetheless, clinical practice guidelines for CMML Address correspondence to: have been inferred from studies designed for MDSs. It is impera- Eric Padron, MD tive that clinicians understand which elements of MDS clinical Assistant Member practice are translatable to CMML, including which evidence has Malignant Hematology been generated from CMML-specific studies and which has not. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute This allows for an evidence-based approach to the treatment of 12902 Magnolia Drive CMML and identifies knowledge gaps in need of further study in Tampa, Florida 33612 a disease-specific manner. This review discusses the diagnosis, E-mail: [email protected] prognosis, and treatment of CMML, with the task of divorcing aspects of MDS practice that have not been demonstrated to be applicable to CMML and merging those that have been shown to be clinically similar. Introduction Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hemato- logic malignancy characterized by absolute peripheral monocytosis, ineffective hematopoiesis, and an increased risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Evolving from JAK 2-Positive Primary Myelofibrosis and Concomitant CD5-Negative Mantle Cell
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Case Reports in Hematology Volume 2012, Article ID 875039, 6 pages doi:10.1155/2012/875039 Case Report Acute Myeloid Leukemia Evolving from JAK 2-Positive Primary Myelofibrosis and Concomitant CD5-Negative Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Diana O. Treaba,1 Salwa Khedr,1 Shamlal Mangray,1 Cynthia Jackson,1 Jorge J. Castillo,2 and Eric S. Winer2 1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA 2 Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Miriam Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI 02904, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Diana O. Treaba, [email protected] Received 2 April 2012; Accepted 21 June 2012 Academic Editors: E. Arellano-Rodrigo, G. Damaj, and M. Gentile Copyright © 2012 Diana O. Treaba et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Primary myelofibrosis (formerly known as chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis), has the lowest incidence amongst the chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms and is characterized by a rather short median survival and a risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) noted in a small subset of the cases, usually as a terminal event. As observed with other chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms, the bone marrow biopsy may harbor small lymphoid aggregates, often assumed reactive in nature. In our paper, we present a 70-year-old Caucasian male who was diagnosed with primary myelofibrosis, and after 8 years of followup and therapy developed an AML.
    [Show full text]
  • Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Acute Leukemia Or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
    Leukemia (2016) 30, 325–330 © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0887-6924/16 www.nature.com/leu ORIGINAL ARTICLE Outcomes for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome FP Tambaro1, G Garcia-Manero2, SM O'Brien2, SH Faderl3, A Ferrajoli2, JA Burger2, S Pierce2, X Wang4, K-A Do4, HM Kantarjian2, MJ Keating2 and WG Wierda2 Acute leukemia (AL) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are uncommon in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We retrospectively identified 95 patients with CLL, also diagnosed with AL (n = 38) or MDS (n = 57), either concurrently (n =5)or subsequent (n = 90) to CLL diagnosis and report their outcomes. Median number of CLL treatments prior to AL and MDS was 2 (0–9) and 1 (0–8), respectively; the most common regimen was purine analog combined with alkylating agent±CD20 monoclonal antibody. Twelve cases had no prior CLL treatment. Among 38 cases with AL, 33 had acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), 3 had acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL; 1 Philadelphia chromosome positive), 1 had biphenotypic and 1 had extramedullary (bladder) AML. Unfavorable AML karyotype was noted in 26, and intermediate risk in 7 patients. There was no association between survival from AL and number of prior CLL regimens or karyotype. Expression of CD7 on blasts was associated with shorter survival. Among MDS cases, all International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) were represented; karyotype was unfavorable in 36, intermediate in 6 and favorable in 12 patients; 10 experienced transformation to AML. Shorter survival from MDS correlated with higher risk IPSS, poor-risk karyotype and increased number of prior CLL treatments.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutations and Prognosis in Primary Myelofibrosis
    Leukemia (2013) 27, 1861–1869 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0887-6924/13 www.nature.com/leu ORIGINAL ARTICLE Mutations and prognosis in primary myelofibrosis AM Vannucchi1, TL Lasho2, P Guglielmelli1, F Biamonte1, A Pardanani2, A Pereira3, C Finke2, J Score4, N Gangat2, C Mannarelli1, RP Ketterling5, G Rotunno1, RA Knudson5, MC Susini1, RR Laborde5, A Spolverini1, A Pancrazzi1, L Pieri1, R Manfredini6, E Tagliafico7, R Zini6, A Jones4, K Zoi8, A Reiter9, A Duncombe10, D Pietra11, E Rumi11, F Cervantes12, G Barosi13, M Cazzola11, NCP Cross4 and A Tefferi2 Patient outcome in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is significantly influenced by karyotype. We studied 879 PMF patients to determine the individual and combinatorial prognostic relevance of somatic mutations. Analysis was performed in 483 European patients and the seminal observations were validated in 396 Mayo Clinic patients. Samples from the European cohort, collected at time of diagnosis, were analyzed for mutations in ASXL1, SRSF2, EZH2, TET2, DNMT3A, CBL, IDH1, IDH2, MPL and JAK2. Of these, ASXL1, SRSF2 and EZH2 mutations inter-independently predicted shortened survival. However, only ASXL1 mutations (HR: 2.02; Po0.001) remained significant in the context of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). These observations were validated in the Mayo Clinic cohort where mutation and survival analyses were performed from time of referral. ASXL1, SRSF2 and EZH2 mutations were independently associated with poor survival, but only ASXL1 mutations held their prognostic relevance (HR: 1.4; P ¼ 0.04) independent of the Dynamic IPSS (DIPSS)-plus model, which incorporates cytogenetic risk. In the European cohort, leukemia-free survival was negatively affected by IDH1/2, SRSF2 and ASXL1 mutations and in the Mayo cohort by IDH1 and SRSF2 mutations.
    [Show full text]
  • Myelofibrosis (MF)
    Myelofibrosis (MF) A Guide for Patients Introduction Being diagnosed with myelofibrosis (MF) can be a shock, particularly when you may have never heard of it. If you have questions about MF – what causes it, who it affects, how it affects your body, what symptoms to expect and likely treatments – this booklet covers the basics for you. You will also find useful advice Haematologist at University about how to get the best from Hospital of Wales, Cardiff. We your haematologist, plus practical are also grateful to Chris Rogers, advice on how to help important patient reviewer, for his valuable people in your life understand contribution. The rewrite was put such a rare condition. For together by Lisa Lovelidge and more information talk to your peer reviewed by Professor Claire haematologist or clinical nurse Harrison. This booklet has since specialist. been updated by our Patient Information Writer Isabelle Leach This booklet originally written and peer reviewed by Dr Sebastian by Professor Claire Harrison, Francis. We also appreciate Consultant Haematologist Norman Childs and Amy Cross for at Guy’s and St Thomas’ their input as patient reviewers NHS Foundation Trust, and as well as Samantha Robertson subsequently revised by Dr whose husband had MF. Steve Knapper, Consultant If you would like any information on the sources used for this booklet, please email [email protected] for a list of references. Version 4 Printed: 10/2020 2 www.leukaemiacare.org.uk Review date: 10/2022 In this booklet Introduction 2 In this booklet 3 About Leukaemia Care 4 What is myelofibrosis? 6 What are the signs and symptoms of MF? 9 How is MF diagnosed? 10 What is the treatment for MF? 12 Living with MF 26 Talking about MF 28 Glossary 31 Useful contacts and further support 39 Helpline freephone 08088 010 444 3 About Leukaemia Care Leukaemia Care is a national charity dedicated to ensuring that people affected by blood cancer have access to the right information, advice and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Massive Myelofibrosis with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Akut Masif Myelofibrozis Ve Akut Lenfoblastik Lösemi Birlikteliği
    204 Case Report Acute massive myelofibrosis with acute lymphoblastic leukemia Akut masif myelofibrozis ve akut lenfoblastik lösemi birlikteliği Zekai Avcı1, Barış Malbora1, Meltem Gülşan1, Feride Iffet Şahin2, Bülent Celasun3, Namık Özbek1 1Department of Pediatrics, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey 2Department of Medical Genetics, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey 3Department of Pathology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey Abstract Acute myelofibrosis is characterized by pancytopenia of sudden onset, megakaryocytic hyperplasia, extensive bone mar- row fibrosis, and the absence of organomegaly. Acute myelofibrosis in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia is extremely rare. We report a 4-year-old boy who was diagnosed as having acute massive myelofibrosis and acute lym- phoblastic leukemia. Performing bone marrow aspiration in this patient was difficult (a “dry tap”), and the diagnosis was established by means of a bone marrow biopsy and immunohistopathologic analysis. The prognostic significance of acute myelofibrosis in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia is not clear. (Turk J Hematol 2009; 26: 204-6) Key words: Acute myelofibrosis, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, dry tap Received: April 9, 2008 Accepted: December 24, 2008 Özet Akut myelofibrozis ani gelişen pansitopeni, kemik iliğinde megakaryositik hiperplazi, belirgin fibrozis ve organomegali olmaması ile karakterize bir hastalıktır. Akut myelofibrozis ile akut lenfoblastik lösemi birlikteliği çok nadir görülmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes Overview and Types
    cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 About Myelodysplastic Syndromes Overview and Types If you have been diagnosed with a myelodysplastic syndrome or are worried about it, you likely have a lot of questions. Learning some basics is a good place to start. ● What Are Myelodysplastic Syndromes? ● Types of Myelodysplastic Syndromes Research and Statistics See the latest estimates for new cases of myelodysplastic syndromes in the US and what research is currently being done. ● Key Statistics for Myelodysplastic Syndromes ● What's New in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Research? What Are Myelodysplastic Syndromes? Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are conditions that can occur when the blood- forming cells in the bone marrow become abnormal. This leads to low numbers of one or more types of blood cells. MDS is considered a type of cancer1. Normal bone marrow 1 ____________________________________________________________________________________American Cancer Society cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 Bone marrow is found in the middle of certain bones. It is made up of blood-forming cells, fat cells, and supporting tissues. A small fraction of the blood-forming cells are blood stem cells. Stem cells are needed to make new blood cells. There are 3 main types of blood cells: red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. Red blood cells pick up oxygen in the lungs and carry it to the rest of the body. These cells also bring carbon dioxide back to the lungs. Having too few red blood cells is called anemia. It can make a person feel tired and weak and look pale. Severe anemia can cause shortness of breath. White blood cells (also known as leukocytes) are important in defending the body against infection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolving Understanding of Prognosis in Post–Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis and Post–Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis Vs Primary Myelofibrosis
    The Evolving Understanding of Prognosis in Post–Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis and Post–Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis vs Primary Myelofibrosis Lucia Masarova, MD, and Srdan Verstovsek, MD Dr Masarova is an assistant professor Abstract: Myelofibrosis (MF) is the most aggressive of the classic and Dr Verstovsek is a professor in Philadelphia chromosome–negative myeloproliferative neoplasms the Department of Leukemia at The (MPNs). In some patients with essential thrombocytopenia or poly- University of Texas MD Anderson cythemia vera, which are relatively benign MPNs, MF develops Cancer Center in Houston, Texas. as a natural evolution of their disease, resulting in post–essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (PET-MF) or post–polycythemia Corresponding author: vera myelofibrosis (PPV-MF). Presenting with the same clini- Srdan Verstovsek, MD, PhD cal features, including debilitating symptoms and signs of bone MD Anderson Cancer Center marrow failure, PET/PPV-MF has traditionally been considered Department of Leukemia akin to primary myelofibrosis (PMF). However, recent observa- 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 428 Houston, TX 77030 tions that PET/PPV-MF may be a distinct clinical entity from PMF Tel: (713) 745-3429 have triggered efforts to improve prognostication in these diseases. E-mail: [email protected] Novel predictive models that incorporate rapidly emerging clini- cal and molecular data are being developed to improve outcomes in patients with PMF or PET/PPV-MF. This review focuses on the major clinical features and prognostic classification systems used in PMF and PET/PPV-MF. Introduction Myelofibrosis (MF) is one of the chronic Philadelphia chromosome– negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). It is characterized by the clonal proliferation of myeloid cells, leading to extramedullary hematopoiesis, hepatosplenomegaly, constitutional symptoms (ie, fatigue, night sweats, weight loss, and fever), and cytopenia, along with bone marrow fibrosis and an increased risk for evolution into acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
    [Show full text]
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Mimicking Primary Myelofibrosis: a Case Report
    ISSN: 2640-7914 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/ahcrr CLINICAL GROUP Received: 02 November, 2020 Case Report Accepted: 01 February, 2021 Published: 02 February, 2021 *Corresponding author: Anju S, Junior Resident, Gov- Chronic myeloid leukemia ernment Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India, Tel: 91 9496057350; E-mail: mimicking primary Keywords: Chronic myeloid leukemia; Primary myelo- fi brosis; Blast crisis; Myeloproliferative neoplasms myelofi brosis: A case report https://www.peertechz.com Anju S*, Jayalakshmy PL and Sankar Sundaram Junior Resident, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India Abstract Bone marrow fi brosis leading to dry tap aspiration and often associated with blast crisis has previously been reported in both Chronic myeloid leukemia and Primary myelofi brosis. The similarities between these two conditions in terms of clinical presentation and morphology can really create a diagnostic dilemma. Here we present a case of Chronic myeloid leukemia in fi brosis and blast crisis in a 32 year old lady which closely resembled Primary myelofi brosis in transformation. All myeloproliferative neoplasms can undergo blast transformation. In this case, the detection of Philadelphia chromosome helped to distinguish Chronic myeloid leukemia from other myeloproliferative neoplasms. Introduction diffi cult to distinguish the different MPNs especially those in blast crisis and fi brosis. The treatment of CML involves targeted Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) results from therapy namely, Imatinib mesylate, which is a tyrosine kinase unchecked proliferation of the cellular elements in the bone inhibitor. Also, JAK1/2 inhibitors administered in PMF patients marrow characterized by panmyelosis and accompanied by show clinical improvement [2]. So, it is Important to distinguish erythrocytosis, granulocytosis, and/or thrombocytosis in every MPNs even in their blastic phase as they have different the peripheral blood.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Profiling of Myeloid Progenitor Cells in Multi-Mutated Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis Identifies KIT D816V As a Distin
    Leukemia (2015) 29, 1115–1122 © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0887-6924/15 www.nature.com/leu ORIGINAL ARTICLE Molecular profiling of myeloid progenitor cells in multi-mutated advanced systemic mastocytosis identifies KIT D816V as a distinct and late event M Jawhar1,8, J Schwaab1,8, S Schnittger2, K Sotlar3, H-P Horny3, G Metzgeroth1, N Müller1, S Schneider4, N Naumann1, C Walz3, T Haferlach2, P Valent5, W-K Hofmann1, NCP Cross6,7, A Fabarius1 and A Reiter1 To explore the molecular profile and its prognostic implication in systemic mastocytosis (SM), we analyzed the mutation status of granulocyte–macrophage colony-forming progenitor cells (CFU-GM) in patients with KIT D816V+ indolent SM (ISM, n = 4), smoldering SM (SSM, n = 2), aggressive SM (ASM, n = 1), SM with associated clonal hematologic non-mast cell lineage disorder (SM-AHNMD, n = 5) and ASM-AHNMD (n = 7). All patients with (A)SM-AHNMD (n = 12) carried 1–4 (median 3) additional mutations in 11 genes tested, most frequently TET2, SRSF2, ASXL1, CBL and EZH2. In multi-mutated (A)SM-AHNMD, KIT D816V+ single-cell-derived CFU-GM colonies were identified in 8/12 patients (median 60%, range 0–95). Additional mutations were identified in CFU-GM colonies in all patients, and logical hierarchy analysis indicated that mutations in TET2, SRSF2 and ASXL1 preceded KIT D816V. In ISM/SSM, no additional mutations were detected and CFU-GM colonies were exclusively KIT D816V−. These data indicate that (a) (A)SM-AHNMD is a multi-mutated neoplasm, (b) mutations in TET2, SRSF2 or ASXL1 precede KIT D816V in ASM-AHNMD, (c) KIT D816V is thus a phenotype modifier toward SM and (d) KIT D816V or other mutations are rare in CFU-GM colonies of ISM/SSM patients, which might explain at least in part their better prognosis.
    [Show full text]