DOCSLIB.ORG

Cryptoliquidity: the Blockchain and Monetary Stability∗

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cryptoliquidity: the Blockchain and Monetary Stability∗ Cryptoliquidity: The Blockchain and Monetary Stability∗ James L. Catony September 27, 2018 Abstract The development of blockchain and cryptocurrency may alleviate the economic strain associated with recession. Economic recessions tend to be aggregate demand driven, meaning that they are caused by fluctuations in the supply of or demand for money. Holding mone- tary policy as solution assumes that stability must arise from outside of the economic system. Under a policy regime that allows innova- tions in blockchain to develop, blockchain technology may promote a money supply that is responsive to changes in demand to hold money. This work suggests that cryptocurrencies present an opportunity to profitably implement rules that promote macroeconomic stability. In particular, cryptocurrency that is asset-backed may provide a means for cheaply attaining liquidity during a crisis. JEL Codes: E40, E41, E42 Keywords: blockchain, cryptocurrency, endogenous money, liquidity, dise- quilibrium AIER Sound Money Project Working Paper No. 2018{15 ∗I owe gratitude to Cameron Harwick for his comments on an early draft. I also bene- fitted greatly from conversations with attendees at the Fargo Bitcoin meetings. Without help from these individuals, this paper would not have been possible. yDepartment of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102 [email protected] 1 Introduction In the last decade, the value and significance of blockchain technology has gained recognition among entrepreneurs, policy makers, and academics. What appeared to the casual observer to be simply a monetary phenomenon has been recognized as a new means of organizing social activity, particularly exchanges and ownership (Davidson, Filippi, and Potts 2016; Antonopou- los 2016). Blockchain technology enables secure transactions on distributed networks, showing potential to reduce transaction costs and transform the structure of economic activity. Focus has begun to shift from cryptocurrency to other uses of blockchain technology. While this is understandable, the following argument will show that the blockchain has only just begun to change our conception of money, banking, and liquidity. The blockchain has potential enable a money stock that is responsive to fluctuations in demand for money and greatly reduce the cost of monetizing existing or future assets. This can reduce inefficiencies that arise from aggregate-demand driven macroeconomic disequilibrium (Yeager 1956; Leijonhufvud and Clower 1981; Horwitz 2000). In the least, it may prevent extreme macroeconomic fluctuations that are produced by erratic macroeconomic policies, such as those observed during the Great Depression (Glasner 1989; Hawtrey 1947; Sumner 2015a; Vedder and Galloway 1997). 1 I begin by describing money, the blockchain, and the relationship between the two and follow by showing 1) how monetary theory informs our under- standing of money creation through the blockchain, 2) how competitive forces make the creation and adoption of a high-quality cryptocurrency practically inevitable even if one cannot predict beforehand which blockchain structure will be adopted for this purpose, and 3) how regulatory and tax policies can either enable or inhibit these developments. 2 Money and the Blockchain In order to discuss the relationship between money and the blockchain requires an adequate description of both. Money is a commonly accepted medium of exchange. It serves as an intermediate good that is typically accepted by a community of buyers and sellers of goods. Although particular details vary across blockchains, a blockchain can be described generally as an accounting ledger comprised of different nodes { accounts { whose records cannot be altered without approval of at least a majority of votes allocated to nodes in the system. Cryptocurrency is an electronic money. It is produced and secured on a blockchain. 2.1 Money Although money operates fundamentally as a medium of exchange, great benefit lies in its enabling of accounting. Money itself must necessarily have 2 been preceded by reciprocal favors through relatively small networks of social bonds (Bourdieu 1990; Harwick 2017). Such a system does not scale as transaction costs of developing a relationship are relatively high and the span of affiliation is constrained as a result. Before money arises, there exists no low-cost common numeraire { unit of account { that allow economic actors to compare the value of goods in fine detail. Money enables this, allowing producers of goods to compare costs and revenues and thereby evaluate their contribution or diminishment of value in the economy and, therefore, to their own wealth. It allows these same actors to hold their wealth in an asset whose value is highly stable and easily saleable (Menger 1892). By lowering transaction costs, money enables development of a broader network of exchange by lowering the level of trust required to engage in trade (Horwitz 2008). Increases in the efficiency of exchange make society wealthier and allows for the development of more expansive trade networks. Finally, money enables banking. Money lowers the cost of lending since money can be lent to investors who wish to purchase physical assets rather than lending the physical assets themselves, a process much more costly to coordinate. 2.2 Blockchain Like money, a blockchain is a means of accounting. Ownership of money represents a claim to resources in an economic system in light of the prefer- ences of agents who own each. Even without an accounting ledger, a money of stable value enables accounting of claims to value. The blockchain is an 3 accounting ledger whose transactions are public to other nodes in the net- work. A functional blockchain network enables convergence of every account to a true representation of agreements in the system. This is achieved demo- cratically. Nodes are allocated votes, perhaps on a one-to-one basis or on a basis tied to productivity or participation in the network.1 These votes legitimate changes in the public ledger according to whichever standard has been adopted for the system. The ledger allows agents to stake claim to particular assets recognized by the blockchain. The Bitcoin blockchain allows owners to stake claim to Bitcoins and ensures the secure transfer of these assets between exchanging parties (Nakamoto 2008). For Bitcoin's blockchain and many other, the ledger of these nodes are encrypted, with miners competing to ascertain the correct key that grants access to changed ledger for the reward of new currency and for the greater purpose of democratically confirming the new state of the ledger among successful mining nodes. A blockchain may recognize a wide variety of assets. The Ethereum blockchain, for example enables the creation of smart-contracts whose terms are executed once the criteria of the contract are met (Ethereum White Pa- per). Since blockchain ledgers are secure, there is no need for a third party to intermediate the transfer of goods and funds entailed in the contract. More 1The latter two of these mechanisms allocating voting rights concerning legitimacy of new accounting records are referred to as \proof-of-work" and \proof-of-stake". 4 generally, blockchains that securely and automatically manage the exchange of assets are referred to as decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs). 2.3 Cryptocurrency Cryptocurrency is necessarily linked to the blockchain. In the case of Bit- coin, it is the only alienable asset associated with the blockchain. Other blockchains, like Ethereum, operate like Bitcoin but also allow for the regis- tration of other assets on the blockchain. Still others enable the creation of cryptocurrency through the tokenization of assets. Asset owners can register their assets on the blockchain and receive, directly or indirectly, cryptocur- rency in exchange. The growth path of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are constrained by an algorithm that determines that rate at which new currency units are made available. With a predetermined growth path, these cryptocurrencies are un- able to respond to changes in demand for money that accompany changes in the rate of economic growth as well as economic crises. Blockchains that al- low the quantity of currency created to change with demand for the currency will improve the ability of the market to stabilize economic fluctuations. 5 3 Dynamics of Money Creation The quantity of money under a commodity regime is determined in light of demand for money and the elasticity of the supply of money.2 The response of the money supply alleviates pressure that is otherwise placed on prices. For the promotion of macroeconomic equilibrium, the case of economic recession is of special interest. During a depression, demand for money tend to exceed it supply, thus promoting a general fall in prices. This fall in prices may lead to discoordination in credit markets that might be alleviated by the creation of money and money substitutes. Using the theoretical framework below, the role of cryptocurrency as base money as well as near money will be considered. Near money is a catego- rization refers to an asset with a high level of liquidity. Such assets alleviate demand for base money during a crisis and thus serve the function of stabiliz- ing the value of total expenditures (aggregate demand) much as the creation of new money does. 3.1 Money and Macroeconomic Disequilibrium Macroeconomic disequilibrium arises when there is a discrepancy between the value of total expenditures and the aggregate value of goods and services that are available for sale and which would be sold in macroeconomic equilib- rium. For the sake of analytical simplicity, let us assume that there is some 2The foundations of the analysis below are presented in the appendix. 6 level of growth of real income in the long-run.3 This value anchors analysis, allowing for the description of macroeconomic equilibrium, and therefore, macroeconomic disequilibrium. Anlaysis begin again with the equation of exchange. Real level of economic growth in the long-run is defined as y0. The value of the other variables at any time are defined by the subscript t.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Origins of Velocity Functions
    The Origins of Velocity Functions Thomas M. Humphrey ike any practical, policy-oriented discipline, monetary economics em- ploys useful concepts long after their prototypes and originators are L forgotten. A case in point is the notion of a velocity function relating money’s rate of turnover to its independent determining variables. Most economists recognize Milton Friedman’s influential 1956 version of the function. Written v = Y/M = v(rb, re,1/PdP/dt, w, Y/P, u), it expresses in- come velocity as a function of bond interest rates, equity yields, expected inflation, wealth, real income, and a catch-all taste-and-technology variable that captures the impact of a myriad of influences on velocity, including degree of monetization, spread of banking, proliferation of money substitutes, devel- opment of cash management practices, confidence in the future stability of the economy and the like. Many also are aware of Irving Fisher’s 1911 transactions velocity func- tion, although few realize that it incorporates most of the same variables as Friedman’s.1 On velocity’s interest rate determinant, Fisher writes: “Each per- son regulates his turnover” to avoid “waste of interest” (1963, p. 152). When rates rise, cashholders “will avoid carrying too much” money thus prompting a rise in velocity. On expected inflation, he says: “When...depreciation is anticipated, there is a tendency among owners of money to spend it speedily . the result being to raise prices by increasing the velocity of circulation” (p. 263). And on real income: “The rich have a higher rate of turnover than the poor. They spend money faster, not only absolutely but relatively to the money they keep on hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Money Demand ECON 40364: Monetary Theory & Policy
    Money Demand ECON 40364: Monetary Theory & Policy Eric Sims University of Notre Dame Fall 2017 1 / 37 Readings I Mishkin Ch. 19 2 / 37 Classical Monetary Theory I We have now defined what money is and how the supply of money is set I What determines the demand for money? I How do the demand and supply of money determine the price level, interest rates, and inflation? I We will focus on a framework in which money is neutral and the classical dichotomy holds: real variables (such as output and the real interest rate) are determined independently of nominal variables like money I We can think of such a world as characterizing the \medium" or \long" runs (periods of time measured in several years) I We will soon discuss the \short run" when money is not neutral 3 / 37 Velocity and the Equation of Exchange I Let Yt denote real output, which we can take to be exogenous with respect to the money supply I Pt is the dollar price of output, so Pt Yt is the dollar value of output (i.e. nominal GDP) I Define velocity as as the average number of times per year that the typical unit of money, Mt , is spent on goods and serves. Denote by Vt I The \equation of exchange" or \quantity equation" is: Mt Vt = Pt Yt I This equation is an identity and defines velocity as the ratio of nominal GDP to the money supply 4 / 37 From Equation of Exchange to Quantity Theory I The quantity equation can be interpreted as a theory of money demand by making assumptions about velocity I Can write: 1 Mt = Pt Yt Vt I Monetarists: velocity is determined primarily by payments technology (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Theory of Money of David Ricardo
    Lecturas de Economía ISSN: 0120-2596 [email protected] Universidad de Antioquia Colombia Takenaga, Susumu Theory of Money of David Ricardo: Quantity Theory and Theory of Value Lecturas de Economía, núm. 59, julio-diciembre, 2003, pp. 73-126 Universidad de Antioquia .png, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=155218004003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative . El carro del heno, 1500 Hieronymus Bosch –El Bosco– Jerónimo, ¿vos cómo lo ves?, 2002 Theory of Money of David Ricardo: Quantity Theory and Theory of Value Susumu Takenaga Lecturas de Economía –Lect. Econ.– No. 59. Medellín, julio - diciembre 2003, pp. 73-126 Theory of Money of David Ricardo : Quantity Theory and Theory of Value Susumu Takenaga Lecturas de Economía, 59 (julio-diciembre, 2003), pp.73-126 Resumen: En lo que es necesario enfatizar, al caracterizar la teoría cuantitativa de David Ricardo, es en que ésta es una teoría de determinación del valor del dinero en una situación particular en la cual se impide que el dinero, sin importar cual sea su forma, entre y salga libremente de la circulación. Para Ricardo, la regulación del valor del dinero por su cantidad es un caso particular en el cual el ajuste del precio de mercado al precio natural requiere un largo periodo de tiempo. La determinación cuantitativa es completamente inadmisible, pero solo cuando el período de observación es más corto que el de ajuste.
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Backed Cryptocurrency Is Crypto All That Glitters?
    Gold Backed Cryptocurrency Is crypto all that glitters? www.thehutchreport.com Insights, Ideas and Tools for the New Economy THE LURE OF GOLD We take a look at the evolution of gold as a store of value to the advent of digital currencies and the use of gold therein. SWOT ANALYSIS We analyze the current state of gold backed cryptocurrencies by way of a SWOT analysis in order to determine the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats facing them as they move deeper into the consciousness of the financial mainstream. GOLD BACKED CRYPTOS AND EXCHANGES We provide an overview of current, pending and past digital currencies that are backed by gold in addition to new gold blockchain exchanges being introduced. The Hutch Report was founded in 2015. Originally from North America, the founders have lived in Europe for the past 20 years and traveled some of the most amazing places that the world has to offer. In that time, learning some incredible things and living an incredible adventure. Along the way we have met a large number of fascinating people and worked with more than a few technology startups, one which was sold to PayPal and another that was sold to Macrovision. In that time we have compiled an extended network of contacts in the European and North American startup communities as well as the venture capital and private banking sectors. Through research, interviews and analysis we are out to discover next great opportunities, investments and nuggets of knowledge. As we go through this process we thought it would make sense to share our insights, ideas and tools for the new economy so our readers can profit along with us.
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Regimes, Money Supply, and the US Business Cycle Since 1959 Implications for Monetary Policy Today
    Monetary Regimes, Money Supply, and the US Business Cycle since 1959 Implications for Monetary Policy Today Hylton Hollander and Lars Christensen MERCATUS WORKING PAPER All studies in the Mercatus Working Paper series have followed a rigorous process of academic evaluation, including (except where otherwise noted) at least one double-blind peer review. Working Papers present an author’s provisional findings, which, upon further consideration and revision, are likely to be republished in an academic journal. The opinions expressed in Mercatus Working Papers are the authors’ and do not represent official positions of the Mercatus Center or George Mason University. Hylton Hollander and Lars Christensen. “Monetary Regimes, Money Supply, and the US Business Cycle since 1959: Implications for Monetary Policy Today.” Mercatus Working Paper, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Arlington, VA, December 2018. Abstract The monetary authority’s choice of operating procedure has significant implications for the role of monetary aggregates and interest rate policy on the business cycle. Using a dynamic general equilibrium model, we show that the type of endogenous monetary regime, together with the interaction between money supply and demand, captures well the actual behavior of a monetary economy—the United States. The results suggest that the evolution toward a stricter interest rate–targeting regime renders central bank balance-sheet expansions ineffective. In the context of the 2007–2009 Great Recession, a more flexible interest rate–targeting
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Monetary Theory: a Marxist Critique
    Class, Race and Corporate Power Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 1 2019 Modern Monetary Theory: A Marxist Critique Michael Roberts [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower Part of the Economics Commons Recommended Citation Roberts, Michael (2019) "Modern Monetary Theory: A Marxist Critique," Class, Race and Corporate Power: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. DOI: 10.25148/CRCP.7.1.008316 Available at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower/vol7/iss1/1 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts, Sciences & Education at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Class, Race and Corporate Power by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modern Monetary Theory: A Marxist Critique Abstract Compiled from a series of blog posts which can be found at "The Next Recession." Modern monetary theory (MMT) has become flavor of the time among many leftist economic views in recent years. MMT has some traction in the left as it appears to offer theoretical support for policies of fiscal spending funded yb central bank money and running up budget deficits and public debt without earf of crises – and thus backing policies of government spending on infrastructure projects, job creation and industry in direct contrast to neoliberal mainstream policies of austerity and minimal government intervention. Here I will offer my view on the worth of MMT and its policy implications for the labor movement. First, I’ll try and give broad outline to bring out the similarities and difference with Marx’s monetary theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series David Laidler On
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES DAVID LAIDLER ON MONETARISM Michael Bordo Anna J. Schwartz Working Paper 12593 http://www.nber.org/papers/w12593 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 October 2006 This paper has been prepared for the Festschrift in Honor of David Laidler, University of Western Ontario, August 18-20, 2006. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2006 by Michael Bordo and Anna J. Schwartz. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. David Laidler on Monetarism Michael Bordo and Anna J. Schwartz NBER Working Paper No. 12593 October 2006 JEL No. E00,E50 ABSTRACT David Laidler has been a major player in the development of the monetarist tradition. As the monetarist approach lost influence on policy makers he kept defending the importance of many of its principles. In this paper we survey and assess the impact on monetary economics of Laidler's work on the demand for money and the quantity theory of money; the transmission mechanism on the link between money and nominal income; the Phillips Curve; the monetary approach to the balance of payments; and monetary policy. Michael Bordo Faculty of Economics Cambridge University Austin Robinson Building Siegwick Avenue Cambridge ENGLAND CD3, 9DD and NBER [email protected] Anna J. Schwartz NBER 365 Fifth Ave, 5th Floor New York, NY 10016-4309 and NBER [email protected] 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Monetary Policy and Monetary Reform: Irving Fisher’S Contributions to Monetary Macroeconomics
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Loef, Hans E.; Monissen, Hans G. Working Paper Monetary policy and monetary reform: Irving Fisher's contributions to monetary macroeconomics W.E.P. - Würzburg Economic Papers, No. 11 Provided in Cooperation with: University of Würzburg, Chair for Monetary Policy and International Economics Suggested Citation: Loef, Hans E.; Monissen, Hans G. (1999) : Monetary policy and monetary reform: Irving Fisher's contributions to monetary macroeconomics, W.E.P. - Würzburg Economic Papers, No. 11, University of Würzburg, Department of Economics, Würzburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48451 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu W. E. P. Würzburg Economic Papers Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classical Equation of Exchange As It Is Applied Today Equates The
    Copyrighted Material quantity theory of money hold even less of it than they did before the infla- The classical equation of exchange as it is applied tionary process began. There is, in fact, an exact in- today equates the money supply multiplied by the verse relationship between the proportion of income velocity of circulation (the number of times the av- held as money and the velocity of circulation with, erage currency unit changes hands in a given year) say, a halving of average money holdings requiring with the economy’s gross domestic product (the that the currency circulate at double the old rate in quantity of output produced multiplied by the price order to buy the same goods as before. In the extreme level). Although the American economist Irving case of ‘‘hyperinflation’’ (broadly defined as inflation Fisher originally included transactions of previously exceeding 50 percent per month), money holdings produced goods and assets as part of the output plunge and the inflation rate significantly outstrips measure, only newly produced goods are included in the rate of money supply growth. Conversely, under present-daycalculationsof grossdomestic product.If deflation, velocity is likely to fall: people hold onto the velocity of circulation and output are both con- their money longer as they recognize that the same stant, there is a one-to-one relationship between a funds will buy more goods and services over time if change in the money supply and a change in prices. prices continue to decline. Thus money demand rises This yields a ‘‘quantity theory of money’’ under as money supply falls, again exaggerating the effects which a doubling of the money supply must be ac- of the money supply change on the aggregate price companied by a doubling of the price level (or, when level.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Currencies: International Actions and Regulations Last
    Virtual Currencies: International Actions and Regulations Last Updated: January 8, 2021 No Legal Advice or Attorney-Client Relationship: This chart is provided by Perkins Coie LLP’s Decentralized Virtual Currency industry practice group for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Recipient should not act upon this information without seeking advice from a lawyer licensed in his/her own state or country. For questions or comments regarding this chart, please contact [email protected]. Developments Over Time Country Current Summary Date Occurrence Sources 2/20/2020 The Financial Services Regulatory Authority has updated and Guidance expanded its guidance through amendments to its cryptoasset regulatory framework. The amendments change the terminology used in the framework from “crypto asset” to “virtual asset,” a change that aligns with those descriptions used by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) (see Issuers and intermediaries of virtual Financial Action Task Force (below)). The FATF currencies and “security” tokens may be recommendations are an international standard for regulation Abu Dhabi subject to regulation—depending upon of crypto assets including KYC requirements, anti-money the nature of the product and service. laundering and fraud prevention rules, and sanctions and screening controls. The amendments also overhaul regulations to move the applicable rules from a singular category to those respective to the underlying activities. This means that such assets can be regulated according to their idiosyncratic natures and not as a monolithic class. 29032535.40 10/09/2017 The Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) of Abu Supplementary Dhabi issued guidance on the regulation of initial coin/token Guidance – Regulation offerings (ICO) and digital currency as supplemental of Initial Coin/Token guidance to the existing 2015 Financial Services and Markets Offerings and Virtual Regulations (FSMR).
    [Show full text]
  • Money As 'Universal Equivalent' and Its Origins in Commodity Exchange
    MONEY AS ‘UNIVERSAL EQUIVALENT’ AND ITS ORIGIN IN COMMODITY EXCHANGE COSTAS LAPAVITSAS DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS SCHOOL OF ORIENTAL AND AFRICAN STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF LONDON [email protected] MAY 2003 1 1.Introduction The debate between Zelizer (2000) and Fine and Lapavitsas (2000) in the pages of Economy and Society refers to the conceptualisation of money. Zelizer rejects the theorising of money by neoclassical economics (and some sociology), and claims that the concept of ‘money in general’ is invalid. Fine and Lapavitsas also criticise the neoclassical treatment of money but argue, from a Marxist perspective, that ‘money in general’ remains essential for social science. Intervening, Ingham (2001) finds both sides confused and in need of ‘untangling’. It is worth stressing that, despite appearing to be equally critical of both sides, Ingham (2001: 305) ‘strongly agrees’ with Fine and Lapavitsas on the main issue in contention, and defends the importance of a theory of ‘money in general’. However, he sharply criticises Fine and Lapavitsas for drawing on Marx’s work, which he considers incapable of supporting a theory of ‘money in general’. Complicating things further, Ingham (2001: 305) also declares himself ‘at odds with Fine and Lapavitsas’s interpretation of Marx’s conception of money’. For Ingham, in short, Fine and Lapavitsas are right to stress the importance of ‘money in general’ but wrong to rely on Marx, whom they misinterpret to boot. Responding to these charges is awkward since, on the one hand, Ingham concurs with the main thrust of Fine and Lapavitsas and, on the other, there is little to be gained from contesting what Marx ‘really said’ on the issue of money.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There a Stable Relationship Between Money Supply and Price Level? Arguments on Quantity Theory of Money Hongjie Zhao Business School, University of Aberdeen
    January, 2021 Granite Journal Open call for papers Is There a Stable Relationship between Money Supply and Price Level? Arguments on Quantity Theory of Money Hongjie Zhao Business School, University of Aberdeen A b s t r a c t Inflation rate nowadays is one of the main concerns for governments. Having a low and stable inflation rate is beneficial for the whole economy. Quantity Theory of Money provides a direct explanation about the cause and consequences of inflation rate or price level. It relates money supply to the general price level by using a simple multiply equation, which is popular among economists and government officials. This article tries to summarize the origin of money, development of Quantity Theory of Money, and the counterarguments about this theory. [Ke y w o r d s ] : Money; Inflation; Quantity Theory of Money [to cite] Zhao, Hongjie (2021). " Is There a Stable Relationship between Money Supply and Price Level? Arguments on Quantity Theory of Money " Granite Journal: a Postgraduate Interdisciplinary Journal: Volume 5, Issue 1 pages 13-18 Granite Journal Volume 5, Issue no 1: (13-18) ISSN 2059-3791 © Zhao, January, 2021 Granite Journal INTRODUCTION Money is something that is generally accepted by the public. It can be in any form, like metals, shells, papers, etc. Money is like language in some ways. You have to speak English to someone who can speak and listen to English. Otherwise, the communication is impossible and inefficient. Gestures and expressions can pass on and exchange less information. Without money, the barter system, which uses goods to exchange goods, is the alternative way.
    [Show full text]