DOCSLIB.ORG

Design and Evaluation of Modular Robots for Maintenance in Large Scientific Facilities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design and Evaluation of Modular Robots for Maintenance in Large Scientific Facilities UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIEROS INDUSTRIALES DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF MODULAR ROBOTS FOR MAINTENANCE IN LARGE SCIENTIFIC FACILITIES PRITHVI SEKHAR PAGALA, MSC 2014 DEPARTAMENTO DE AUTOMÁTICA, INGENIERÍA ELECTRÓNICA E INFORMÁTICA INDUSTRIAL ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIEROS INDUSTRIALES DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF MODULAR ROBOTS FOR MAINTENANCE IN LARGE SCIENTIFIC FACILITIES PhD Thesis Author: Prithvi Sekhar Pagala, MSC Advisors: Manuel Ferre Perez, PhD Manuel Armada, PhD 2014 DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF MODULAR ROBOTS FOR MAINTENANCE IN LARGE SCIENTIFIC FACILITIES Author: Prithvi Sekhar Pagala, MSC Tribunal: Presidente: Dr. Fernando Matía Espada Secretario: Dr. Claudio Rossi Vocal A: Dr. Antonio Giménez Fernández Vocal B: Dr. Juan Antonio Escalera Piña Vocal C: Dr. Concepción Alicia Monje Micharet Suplente A: Dr. Mohamed Abderrahim Fichouche Suplente B: Dr. José Maráa Azorín Proveda Acuerdan otorgar la calificación de: Madrid, de de 2014 Acknowledgements The duration of the thesis development lead to inspiring conversations, exchange of ideas and expanding knowledge with amazing individuals. I would like to thank my advisers Manuel Ferre and Manuel Armada for their constant men- torship, support and motivation to pursue different research ideas and collaborations during the course of entire thesis. The team at the lab has not only enriched my professionally life but also in Spanish ways. Thank you all the members of the ROMIN, Francisco, Alex, Jose, Jordi, Ignacio, Javi, Chema, Luis .... This research project has been supported by a Marie Curie Early Stage Initial Training Network Fellowship of the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program "PURESAFE". I wish to thank the supervisors and fellow research members of the project for the amazing support, fruitful interactions and training events. During the project, I had the opportunity to collaborate and work with three different institutions. I wish to thank Ramviyas, Thomas, Mathieu, Pierre, Keith, Bruno from CERN for their constant help in understanding the challenges and different research collaborations. I wish to thank Enrique, Alan, Simon and Eddie from OTL for their valuable insights with regard to the project and the design of connector mechanism. I wish to thank Jouni, Reza, JP, Liisa, Douzi and Aref from TUT and Helmut and Luis from GSI for coordinating the project, discussions and integration of my research work with other fellows. Family and friends have always greatly motivated me in pursuing the research and have made each day into a memorable one. My sincere thanks to all who have helped me in this endeavour. vii Abstract Robots have constantly been moving towards better design and increased predictability in task execution, leading to expanding and increasing robot presence in several fields and applications. One of which is modular robots in large scientific facilities. Modular robots are characterised for not having a fixed configuration but this presents challenges that need to be overcome, to benefit from the large set of advantages. The large scientific facilities presents a challenging environment for robot deployment due to the presence of hazard like ionising radiation and access controlled complicated environment. This thesis explains, the elements of criteria & constraints, hardware design of the robot system and connector mechanism, applications and RAMS (Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety) approach. The basic applications in maintenance tasks is presented along with advanced applications of cooperation, collaboration and integration with planning tool using robot prototype and simulation results. This work extends the use of modular robotic systems to prevent human interventions for maintenance tasks in workspaces with ionising radiation hazard. The different research performed towards improving the RAMS aspects of robot deployment are presented with experiments and results. They focus on mobile robot energy optimisation, force sensorless estimation of external force and energy perspective for bilateral control in telemanip- ulation. The thesis assesses the use of a modular robot system to perform maintenance and inspection tasks such as, remote inspection, manipulation and cooperation with deployed or existing robotic systems inside the facilities. The proposed heterogeneous modular robotic system is evaluated using simulations and the prototype across selected robot configuration to perform tasks. Re- sults obtained, show the advantages and ability of the modular robot to perform the necessary maintenance tasks, as well as its flexibility to adapt and evolve depending on the future needs. Therefore, proving to be a possible solution for inclusion in large scientific facilities to perform maintenance tasks. ix Resumen Los robots se han ido moviendo constantemente hacia un mejor diseño y una mejor predicción en la ejecución de tareas, lo que ha conllevado a un incremento de su presencia en diferentes áreas y aplicaciones. Una de ellas son los robots modulares en grandes instalaciones científicas. Los robots modulares se caracterizan por no tener una configuración fija, pero esto presenta desafíos que hay que superar, para beneficiarse de la amplia serie de ventajas. Las grandes instalaciones científicas se presentan como un entorno difícil para el despliegue de robots debido a la presencia de radiación y un acceso controlado y restringido al sitio de trabajo. En esta tesis se explican los criterios y limitaciones, el diseño del hardware de robots modu- lares así como un conector de módulos, todo esto utilizando el enfoque RAMS por sus siglas en ingles (Fiabilidad, Disponibilidad, Mantenibilidad y Seguridad). Se presentan aplicaciones básicas en tareas de mantenimiento así como aplicaciones avanzadas de cooperación, colabo- ración e integración utilizando resultados obtenidos tanto en simulación como en los prototipos desarrollados. Este trabajo extiende el uso de sistemas robóticos modulares para evitar la in- tervención humana durante tareas de mantenimiento en los espacios de trabajo con riesgo de radiación ionizante. Los diferentes trabajos de investigación realizados con el fin de mejorar los aspectos del RAMS en el despliegue de robots son presentados junto con los experimentos realizados y los resultados obtenidos. Estas mejoras se centran en la optimización del consumo de energía, la estimación de fuerzas externas sin sensores y la perspectiva energética del control bilateral en telemanipu- lación. La tesis evalúa el uso de un sistema robótico modular para realizar tareas de mantenimiento, tales como la inspección remota, la manipulación y la cooperación con otros sistemas robóticos existentes. El sistema heterogéneo propuesto se ha evalúado mediante simulaciones y diferentes prototipos. Los resultados obtenidos, muestran las ventajas y la capacidad de los robots modu- lares para realizar las tareas de mantenimiento, así como su flexibilidad para adaptarse a medida que las necesidades cambian. Por lo tanto, han demostrando ser una posible solución para su inclusión en grandes instalaciones científicas para realizar tareas de mantenimiento. xi xii Contents Acknowledgements vii Abstract ix Resumen xi Contents xiii List of Figures xvii List of Tables xxi Terms and Definitions xxiii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Goals ....................................... 1 1.2 Motivation ..................................... 1 1.3 Outline ...................................... 2 2 Background and Related Work 5 2.1 Modular robots .................................. 5 2.1.1 History .................................. 7 2.1.2 Advantages of modular robotic system .................. 8 2.1.3 Classifications .............................. 9 2.2 Particle accelerators ................................ 13 2.2.1 Environment constraints ......................... 14 2.2.2 Requirements and tasks .......................... 16 2.3 Radiation protection ................................ 18 3 Heterogeneous Modular Robotic System 23 3.1 Constraints and task requirement ......................... 24 3.2 Modular robot system and ionising radiation ................... 25 3.2.1 Prototype ................................. 26 3.3 System architecture ................................ 30 3.3.1 Robot configurations and simulation ................... 36 3.4 Applications and advantages ........................... 42 3.5 Summary ..................................... 46 3.6 Connector mechanism .............................. 46 xiii xiv Contents 3.6.1 Related work ............................... 47 3.6.2 Requirements to analyse ......................... 48 3.6.3 Previous connectors ........................... 51 3.6.4 Connector mechanism .......................... 53 3.7 Summary ..................................... 56 4 RAMS Approach 59 4.1 Case 1: Energy management for mobile robots ................. 64 4.1.1 Related work ............................... 64 4.1.2 Methodology ............................... 66 4.1.3 Experimental setup ............................ 70 4.1.4 Results and discussions .......................... 73 4.1.5 Summary ................................. 74 4.2 Case 2 : External force estimation using robot model and current sensing .... 76 4.2.1 Requirements ............................... 77 4.2.2 Hypothesis ................................ 79 4.2.3 Preliminary results ............................ 81 4.2.4 Setup ................................... 81 4.2.5 Experiment design ............................ 82 4.2.6 Results .................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modeling and Control of Underwater Robotic Systems
    Modeling and Control of Underwater Robotic Systems Dr.ing. thesis Ingrid Schj0lberg Department of Engineering Cybernetics Norwegian University of Science and Technology March 1996 Report 96-21-W Department of Engineering Cybernetics Norwegian University of Science and Technology N-7034 Trondheim, Norway OBmetmoN of im doombst b mwia DISCLAI R Portions of tins document may be Illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document Preface This thesis is submitted for the Doktor ingenipr degree at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). The research was carried out at the Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH), Department of Engi ­ neering Cybernetics, in the period from January 1991 to March 1996. The work was funded by The Research Council of Norway (NFR) through the MOBATEL project. Professor Dr.ing. Olav Egeland was my supervisor. During the academic year 1992-1993 I worked at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN). This stay was funded by TOTAL Norge. The work performed during this stay has not been included in this thesis. I am indebted to Professor Egeland for giving me the opportunity to take this study. I am also grateful for advice and comments during the writing of scientific articles and for the introduction to the fields of force control and vibration damping. I am thankful to the administrator of the MOBATEL project, Professor Jens G. Balchen, for letting me take part in this project. I am grateful to Professor Dr.ing. Thor I. Fossen for useful discussions on hydrodynamics. I want to express my gratitude to Dr.ing.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning for Microrobot Exploration: Model-Based Locomotion, Sparse-Robust Navigation, and Low-Power Deep Classification
    Learning for Microrobot Exploration: Model-based Locomotion, Sparse-robust Navigation, and Low-power Deep Classification Nathan O. Lambert1, Farhan Toddywala1, Brian Liao1, Eric Zhu1, Lydia Lee1, and Kristofer S. J. Pister1 Abstract— Building intelligent autonomous systems at any Classification Intelligent, mm scale Fast Downsampling scale is challenging. The sensing and computation constraints Microrobot of a microrobot platform make the problems harder. We present improvements to learning-based methods for on-board learning of locomotion, classification, and navigation of microrobots. We show how simulated locomotion can be achieved with model- Squeeze-and-Excite Hard Activation System-on-chip: based reinforcement learning via on-board sensor data distilled Camera, Radio, Battery into control. Next, we introduce a sparse, linear detector and a Dynamic Thresholding method to FAST Visual Odometry for improved navigation in the noisy regime of mm scale imagery. Locomotion Navigation We end with a new image classifier capable of classification Controller Parameter Unknown Dynamics Original Training Image with fewer than one million multiply-and-accumulate (MAC) Optimization Modeling & Simulator Resulting Map operations by combining fast downsampling, efficient layer Reward structures and hard activation functions. These are promising … … SLIPD steps toward using state-of-the-art algorithms in the power- Ground Truth Estimated Pos. State Space limited world of edge-intelligence and microrobots. Sparse I. INTRODUCTION Local Control PID: K K K Microrobots have been touted as a coming revolution p d i for many tasks, such as search and rescue, agriculture, or Fig. 1: Our vision for microrobot exploration based on distributed sensing [1], [2]. Microrobotics is a synthesis of three contributions: 1) improving data-efficiency of learning Microelectromechanical systems (MEMs), actuators, power control, 2) a more noise-robust and novel approach to visual electronics, and computation.
    [Show full text]
  • Robot Learning
    Robot Learning 15-494 Cognitive Robotics David S. Touretzky & Ethan Tira-Thompson Carnegie Mellon Spring 2009 04/06/09 15-494 Cognitive Robotics 1 What Can Robots Learn? ● Parameter tuning, e.g., for a faster walk ● Perceptual learning: ALVINN driving the Navlab ● Map learning, e.g., SLAM algorithms ● Behavior learning; plans and macro-operators – Shakey the Robot (SRI) – Robo-Soar ● Learning from human teachers – Operant conditioning: Skinnerbots – Imitation learning 04/06/09 15-494 Cognitive Robotics 2 Lots of Work on Robot Learning ● IEEE Robotics and Automation Society – Technical Committee on Robot Learning – http://www.learning-robots.de ● Robot Learning Summer School – Lisbon, Portugal; July 20-24, 2009 ● Workshops at major robotics conferences – ICRA 2009 workshop: Approachss to Sensorimotor Learning on Humanoid Robots – Kobe, Japan; May 17, 2009 04/06/09 15-494 Cognitive Robotics 3 Parameter Optimization ● How fast can an AIBO walk? Figures from Kohl & Stone, ICRA 2004, for the ERS-210 model: – CMU (2002) 200 mm/s – German Team 230 mm/s Hand-tuned gaits – UT Austin Villa 245 mm/s – UNSW 254 mm/s – Hornsby (1999) 170 mm/s – UNSW 270 mm/s Learned gaits – UT Austin Villa 291 mm/s 04/06/09 15-494 Cognitive Robotics 4 Walk Parameters 12 parameters to optimize: ● Front locus (height, x pos, ypos) ● Rear locus (height, x pos, y pos) ● Locus length ● Locus skew multiplier (in the x-y plane, for turning) ● Height of front of body ● Height of rear of body From Kohl & Stone (ICRA 2004) ● Foot travel time ● Fraction of time foot is on ground 04/06/09 15-494 Cognitive Robotics 5 Optimization Strategy ● “Policy gradient reinforcement learning”: – Walk parameter assignment = “policy” – Estimate the gradient along each dimension by trying combinations of slight perturbations in all parameters – Measure walking speed on the actual robot – Optimize all 12 parameters simultaneously – Adjust parameters according to the estimated gradient.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Review of Research Trends in Robotics Education for Young Children
    sustainability Review Systematic Review of Research Trends in Robotics Education for Young Children Sung Eun Jung 1,* and Eun-sok Won 2 1 Department of Educational Theory and Practice, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA 2 Department of Liberal Arts Education, Mokwon University, Daejeon 35349, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-706-296-3001 Received: 31 January 2018; Accepted: 13 March 2018; Published: 21 March 2018 Abstract: This study conducted a systematic and thematic review on existing literature in robotics education using robotics kits (not social robots) for young children (Pre-K and kindergarten through 5th grade). This study investigated: (1) the definition of robotics education; (2) thematic patterns of key findings; and (3) theoretical and methodological traits. The results of the review present a limitation of previous research in that it has focused on robotics education only as an instrumental means to support other subjects or STEM education. This study identifies that the findings of the existing research are weighted toward outcome-focused research. Lastly, this study addresses the fact that most of the existing studies used constructivist and constructionist frameworks not only to design and implement robotics curricula but also to analyze young children’s engagement in robotics education. Relying on the findings of the review, this study suggests clarifying and specifying robotics-intensified knowledge, skills, and attitudes in defining robotics education in connection to computer science education. In addition, this study concludes that research agendas need to be diversified and the diversity of research participants needs to be broadened. To do this, this study suggests employing social and cultural theoretical frameworks and critical analytical lenses by considering children’s historical, cultural, social, and institutional contexts in understanding young children’s engagement in robotics education.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Leapmotion Sensor Based Demonstration for Robotic Refine Tabletop Object Manipulation Task
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology 1 (2016) 104e113 http://www.journals.elsevier.com/caai-transactions-on-intelligence-technology/ Original article Multi-LeapMotion sensor based demonstration for robotic refine tabletop object manipulation task* Haiyang Jin a,b,c, Qing Chen a,b, Zhixian Chen a,b, Ying Hu a,b,*, Jianwei Zhang c a Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China b Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China c University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany Available online 2 June 2016 Abstract In some complicated tabletop object manipulation task for robotic system, demonstration based control is an efficient way to enhance the stability of execution. In this paper, we use a new optical hand tracking sensor, LeapMotion, to perform a non-contact demonstration for robotic systems. A Multi-LeapMotion hand tracking system is developed. The setup of the two sensors is analyzed to gain a optimal way for efficiently use the informations from the two sensors. Meanwhile, the coordinate systems of the Mult-LeapMotion hand tracking device and the robotic demonstration system are developed. With the recognition to the element actions and the delay calibration, the fusion principles are developed to get the improved and corrected gesture recognition. The gesture recognition and scenario experiments are carried out, and indicate the improvement of the proposed Multi-LeapMotion hand tracking system in tabletop object manipulation task for robotic demonstration. Copyright © 2016, Chongqing University of Technology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
    [Show full text]
  • Special Feature on Advanced Mobile Robotics
    applied sciences Editorial Special Feature on Advanced Mobile Robotics DaeEun Kim School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Shinchon, Seoul 03722, Korea; [email protected] Received: 29 October 2019; Accepted: 31 October 2019; Published: 4 November 2019 1. Introduction Mobile robots and their applications are involved with many research fields including electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, computer science, artificial intelligence and cognitive science. Mobile robots are widely used for transportation, surveillance, inspection, interaction with human, medical system and entertainment. This Special Issue handles recent development of mobile robots and their research, and it will help find or enhance the principle of robotics and practical applications in real world. The Special Issue is intended to be a collection of multidisciplinary work in the field of mobile robotics. Various approaches and integrative contributions are introduced through this Special Issue. Motion control of mobile robots, aerial robots/vehicles, robot navigation, localization and mapping, robot vision and 3D sensing, networked robots, swarm robotics, biologically-inspired robotics, learning and adaptation in robotics, human-robot interaction and control systems for industrial robots are covered. 2. Advanced Mobile Robotics This Special Issue includes a variety of research fields related to mobile robotics. Initially, multi-agent robots or multi-robots are introduced. It covers cooperation of multi-agent robots or formation control. Trajectory planning methods and applications are listed. Robot navigations have been studied as classical robot application. Autonomous navigation examples are demonstrated. Then services robots are introduced as human-robot interaction. Furthermore, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) are shown for autonomous navigation or map building.
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Vision for Service Robots & Surveillance
    Machine Vision for Service Robots & Surveillance Prof.dr.ir. Pieter Jonker EMVA Conference 2015 Delft University of Technology Cognitive Robotics (text intro) This presentation addresses the issue that machine vision and learning systems will dominate our lives and work in future, notably through surveillance systems and service robots. Pieter Jonker’s specialism is robot vision; the perception and cognition of service robots, more specifically autonomous surveillance robots and butler robots. With robot vision comes the artificial intelligence; if you perceive and understand, than taking sensible actions becomes relative easy. As robots – or autonomous cars, or … - can move around in the world, they encounter various situations to which they have to adapt. Remembering in which situation you adapted to what is learning. Learning comes in three flavors: cognitive learning through Pattern Recognition (association), skills learning through Reinforcement Learning (conditioning) and the combination (visual servoing); such as a robot learning from observing a human how to poor in a glass of beer. But as always in life this learning comes with a price; bad teachers / bad examples. 2 | 16 Machine Vision for Service Robots & Surveillance Prof.dr.ir. Pieter Jonker EMVA Conference Athens 12 June 2015 • Professor of (Bio) Mechanical Engineering Vision based Robotics group, TU-Delft Robotics Institute • Chairman Foundation Living Labs for Care Innovation • CEO LEROVIS BV, CEO QdepQ BV, CTO Robot Care Systems Delft University of Technology Content •
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Robot Learning for Manipulation: Challenges, Representations, and Algorithms
    Journal of Machine Learning Research 22 (2021) 1-82 Submitted 9/19; Revised 8/20; Published 1/21 A Review of Robot Learning for Manipulation: Challenges, Representations, and Algorithms Oliver Kroemer∗ [email protected] School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA Scott Niekum [email protected] Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX 78712, USA George Konidaris [email protected] Department of Computer Science Brown University Providence, RI 02912, USA Editor: Daniel Lee Abstract A key challenge in intelligent robotics is creating robots that are capable of directly in- teracting with the world around them to achieve their goals. The last decade has seen substantial growth in research on the problem of robot manipulation, which aims to exploit the increasing availability of affordable robot arms and grippers to create robots capable of directly interacting with the world to achieve their goals. Learning will be central to such autonomous systems, as the real world contains too much variation for a robot to expect to have an accurate model of its environment, the objects in it, or the skills required to manipulate them, in advance. We aim to survey a representative subset of that research which uses machine learning for manipulation. We describe a formalization of the robot manipulation learning problem that synthesizes existing research into a single coherent framework and highlight the many remaining research opportunities and challenges. Keywords: manipulation, learning, review, robots, MDPs 1. Introduction Robot manipulation is central to achieving the promise of robotics|the very definition of a robot requires that it has actuators, which it can use to effect change on the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue On
    FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series: Mechanics, Automatic Control and Robotics Vol. 6, Special Issue, 2007, pp. I - VIII Special Issue on Advanced Controls And Signal Processing in Active And Robotic Systems Foreword by the Guest Editor For quite some time the idea about this special cross-disciplinary issue has been both puz- zling as well as troubling me until finally I came to a positive conclusion. To my joy, Prof. Dr. Katica R. (Stevanović) Hedrih, Madam Editor-in-Chief of Facta Universitaties Series on Mechanics, Automatics Control and Robotics, embraced this idea frankly and not only devoted her efforts and time but also her passionate co-operation in all respects. Furthermore, to even greater joy of mine, a number of distinguished colleagues as well as young researchers have embraced the idea too. They all co-operated with me on this special issue with patience, for which I remain indebted to them for life. Here it is now this special issue before the competent research communities for final evaluation. For indeed their words are the final ones. This special issue begins with the article "Nanorobots for Microfactories to Operations in the Human Body and Robots Propelled by Bacteria" by Professor Sylvain Martel form Ottawa, Can- ada. This article is focused on the exploitation of the properties at the nanoscale that enables novel nanorobotic-based instrumented platforms and techniques. Some unique interdisciplinary examples from his research laboratory are described thus providing certain insights about the possibilities and the huge potentials of nanorobotics with main application areas in medicine and bioengineering. These also include supporting the new robotic platforms for micro- and nano- manufacturing and high-throughput automatic operations at the nanoscale.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Mobile Industrial Manipulator : a Review of System Architecture and Applications
    This is a repository copy of Collaborative mobile industrial manipulator : a review of system architecture and applications. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/151956/ Version: Accepted Version Proceedings Paper: Yang, M., Yang, E. F., Zante, R. C. et al. (2 more authors) (2019) Collaborative mobile industrial manipulator : a review of system architecture and applications. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Automation & Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Automation & Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 6-7 September 2019 Collaborative mobile industrial manipulator: A review of system architecture and applications Manman Yang1, Erfu Yang1, Remi Christophe Zante1, Mark Post2, Xuefeng Liu3 1Design, Manufacture & Engineering Management University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK Email: {manman.yang, erfu.yang, remi.zante}@strath.ac.uk 2Department of Electronic Engineering University of York, York, UK Email: [email protected] 3School of Electronic and Optical Engineering Nanjing University Of Science And Technology, Nanjing, China Email: [email protected] Abstract—This paper provides a comprehensive review of the carried out in future [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgements Acknowl
    2161 Acknowledgements Acknowl. B.21 Actuators for Soft Robotics F.58 Robotics in Hazardous Applications by Alin Albu-Schäffer, Antonio Bicchi by James Trevelyan, William Hamel, The authors of this chapter have used liberally of Sung-Chul Kang work done by a group of collaborators involved James Trevelyan acknowledges Surya Singh for de- in the EU projects PHRIENDS, VIACTORS, and tailed suggestions on the original draft, and would also SAPHARI. We want to particularly thank Etienne Bur- like to thank the many unnamed mine clearance experts det, Federico Carpi, Manuel Catalano, Manolo Gara- who have provided guidance and comments over many bini, Giorgio Grioli, Sami Haddadin, Dominic Lacatos, years, as well as Prof. S. Hirose, Scanjack, Way In- Can zparpucu, Florian Petit, Joshua Schultz, Nikos dustry, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, and Total Marine Tsagarakis, Bram Vanderborght, and Sebastian Wolf for Systems for providing photographs. their substantial contributions to this chapter and the William R. Hamel would like to acknowledge work behind it. the US Department of Energy’s Robotics Crosscut- ting Program and all of his colleagues at the na- C.29 Inertial Sensing, GPS and Odometry tional laboratories and universities for many years by Gregory Dudek, Michael Jenkin of dealing with remote hazardous operations, and all We would like to thank Sarah Jenkin for her help with of his collaborators at the Field Robotics Center at the figures. Carnegie Mellon University, particularly James Os- born, who were pivotal in developing ideas for future D.36 Motion for Manipulation Tasks telerobots. by James Kuffner, Jing Xiao Sungchul Kang acknowledges Changhyun Cho, We acknowledge the contribution that the authors of the Woosub Lee, Dongsuk Ryu at KIST (Korean Institute first edition made to this chapter revision, particularly for Science and Technology), Korea for their provid- Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • 74. Learning from Humans Fro
    1995 Multimedia Contents Learning74. Learning from Humans fro Aude G. Billard, Sylvain Calinon, Rüdiger Dillmann 74.1 Learning of Robots .............................. 1995 This chapter surveys the main approaches devel- 74.1.1 Principle................................... 1996 oped to date to endow robots with the ability 74.1.2 Brief History.............................. 1996 to learn from human guidance. The field is best 74.2 Key Issues When Learning known as robot programming by demonstration, from Human Demonstrations ............... 1998 robot learning from/by demonstration, appren- 74.2.1 When and Whom to Imitate ....... 1998 ticeship learning and imitation learning. We start 74.2.2 How to Imitate and How to Solve with a brief historical overview of the field. We the Correspondence Problem...... 1999 then summarize the various approaches taken 74.3 Interfaces for Demonstration................ 2000 to solve four main questions: when, what, who 74.4 Algorithms to Learn from Humans ........ 2002 and when to imitate. We emphasize the im- 74.4.1 Learning Individual Motions....... 2002 portance of choosing well the interface and the 74.4.2 Learning Compound Actions ....... 2003 channels used to convey the demonstrations, 74.4.3 Incremental Teaching Methods ... 2004 with an eye on interfaces providing force control 74.4.4 Combining Learning and force feedback. We then review algorith- from Humans with Other mic approaches to model skills individually and Learning Techniques .................. 2005 as a compound and algorithms that combine 74.4.5 Learning from Humans, a Form learning from human guidance with reinforce- of Human–Robot Interaction...... 2006 ment learning. We close with a look on the use 74.5 Conclusions and Open Issues of language to guide teaching and a list of open in Robot LfD .......................................
    [Show full text]