Cover-184 Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA 184 DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY-FOURTH REPORT ON ACTION TAKEN BY THE GOVERNMENT ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FOURTH REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS ON THE DEMANDS FOR GRANTS (2007-2008) OF THE MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS (PRESENTED TO THE RAJYA SABHA ON THE 11TH MARCH, 2008) (LAID ON THE TABLE OF THE LOK SABHA ON THE 11TH MARCH, 2008) RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI MARCH, 2008/PHALGUNA, 1929 (SAKA) Website:http://rajyasabha.nic.in E-mail:[email protected] PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY-FOURTH REPORT ON ACTION TAKEN BY THE GOVERNMENT ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FOURTH REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS ON THE DEMANDS FOR GRANTS (2007-2008) OF THE MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS (PRESENTED TO THE RAJYA SABHA ON THE 11TH MARCH, 2008) (LAID ON THE TABLE OF THE LOK SABHA ON THE 11TH MARCH, 2008) RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI MARCH, 2008/PHALGUNA, 1929 (SAKA) CONTENTS PAGES 1. COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE ......................................................................................... (i)-(ii) 2. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ (iii) 3. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ................................................................................................ 1—24 4. MINUTES OF THE MEETING ................................................................................................... 25—27 COMPOSITION OF THE DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS (2007-08) 1. Dr. V. Maitreyan – Chairman RAJYA SABHA 2. Dr. Prabha Thakur 3. Shri Suryakantbhai Acharya 4. Shri Bhagirathi Majhi 5. Shri Kamal Akhtar 6. Shri Saman Pathak 7. Shri Jabir Husain 8. Shri Ravula Chandra Sekar Reddy 9. Dr. Barun Mukherjee *10. Shri D. Raja LOK SABHA 11. Shri Jasubhai Dhanabhai Barad 12. Dr. Sujan Chakraborty 13. Shri Thupstan Chhewang 14. Shri Pankaj Chowdhary 15. Shri Francis Fanthome 16. Shri Babubhai K. Katara 17. Shri A. Venkatesh Naik 18. Shri Brahmananda Panda 19. Shrimati Neeta Pateriya 20. Shri Jaysingrao Gaikwad Patil 21. Shri Pratik P. Patil 22. Shri Bachi Singh 'Bachda' Rawat 23. Shri K.C. Singh "Baba" 24. Shri Kirti Vardhan Singh #25. Vacant 26. Shri Rampal Singh 27. Shrimati Jayaben B. Thakkar 28. Shri Aruna Kumar Vundavalli 29. Shri Akhilesh Yadav 30. Shri Mitrasen Yadav 31. Shri Sita Ram Yadav * Nominated w.e.f. 28th August, 2007. # Vacancy caused due to resignation of Shri Rakesh Singh from the Committee w.e.f. lst December, 2007. (i) (ii) SECRETARIAT Shrimati Agnes Momin George, Joint Secretary Shri S. Jason, Joint Director Shri V.S.P. Singh, Deputy Director Shri S. Rangarajan, Assistant Director INTRODUCTION I, the Chairman of the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science and Technology, Environment and Forests, having been authorised by the Committee to present the Report on its behalf, present this One Hundred Eighty-fourth Report on the Action Taken by the Ministry of Environment and Forests on the recommendations contained in One Hundred Seventy-fourth Report of the Committee on Demands for Grants (2007-08) of the Ministry of Environment and Forests. 2. The Report of the Committee deals with the Action Taken by the Ministry of Environment and Forests on the recommendations contained in the One Hundred and Seventy-fourth Report of the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science and Technology, Environment and Forests on the Demands for Grants (2007-08) of the Ministry of Environment and Forests which was presented to the Rajya Sabha on 26th April, 2007. 3. There were twenty-three recommendations contained in the One Hundred Seventy-fourth Report of the Committee. Action Taken Notes on the recommendations of the Committee were received from the Ministry on 26th October, 2007. 4. In the meeting held on 4th March, 2008 the Committee considered the draft Action Taken Report and adopted the same. Dr. V. Maitreyan NEW DELHI; Chairman, March 4, 2008 Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science and Technology, Environment and Forests. (iii) 1 REPORT The Report of the Committee deals with the Action Taken by the Ministry of Environment and Forests on the recommendations contained in the One Hundred Seventy Fourth Report of the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science and Technology, Environment and Forests on the Demands for Grants (2007-08) of the Ministry of Environment and Forests, which was presented to both the Houses of Parliament on 26th April, 2007. There were twenty-three recommendations in the Report of the Committee. Action Taken Notes on the recommendations of the Committee were received from the Ministry on 26th October, 2007. The Committee’s recommendations, action taken thereon and comments of the Committee on the Action Taken by the Ministry of Environment and Forests are set out in the succeeding paragraphs:— REVIEW OF PLAN OUTLAY 2006-07 AND PROPOSALS FOR 2007-08 1. Recommendation (Para 5.5) The Committee is concerned with the way the budgetary allocation has been made in respect of the Ministry of Environment and Forests during the year 2007-08. It has been observed that there is just 1.2 per cent increase in overall budget allocations as compared to last year’s allocations. It appears that the Planning Commission has not even considered the normal rate of inflation. At the same time, Committee would like to have clarification from Ministry in this context as to what are the specific reasons due to which the Planning Commission has approved such a tight budgetary allocation to the Ministry. The committee has strong apprehensions that with such tight budget, Ministry would not be able to pursue its ongoing schemes with vigour. The Committee recommends that their allocations be re-examined in view of the increasing need to maintain high quality of environmental inputs. Action Taken by the Government Overall budgetary allocations for the Ministry was increased from Rs. 1520.14 crores in 2006-07 (BE) to Rs. 1539.00 crores in 2007-08, implying an increase of 1.24 per cent. Plan outlay was increased from Rs. 1338.93 crores in 2006-07 to Rs. 1351.00 crores, indicating an increase of 0.90 per cent, and non-plan outlay was enhanced from Rs. 181.21 crores in 2006-07 to Rs. 188.00 crores in 2007-08, a rise of 3.75 per cent. Thus, the low increase in Ministry’s budget in 2007-08 was on account of only a marginal increase in Ministry’s plan budget for 2007-08. Planning Commission, in plan discussions with the Ministry, had approved a plan outlay of Rs. 1421.00 crores for 2007-08, implying a normal step up of 6.1 per cent over the previous year. Subsequently, and as a part of its Zero Based Budgeting Exercise, Planning Commission deducted an amount of Rs. 70 crores from this approved plan outlay, transferring these salary and establishment related expenses from Plan to Non-Plan budget of the Ministry. This recommendation of the Planning Commission to the Finance Ministry resulted in a reduction of Plan Budget of the Ministry to Rs. 1351 crores, while the Non-Plan Budget of the Ministry was required to be correspondingly enhanced by the Finance Ministry. While this reduction in Plan Budget was effected by the Planning Commission while allocating plan outlays to the Ministry, corresponding enhancement of Ministry’s Non-Plan Budget in 2007-08 by the Finance Ministry was not operationalized. Subsequently it was clarified by the Finance Ministry, that such transfers from Plan to Non-Plan budget, as effected by the Planning Commission, were not possible in case of ongoing schemes. The enhanced requirement of the Ministry will, thus, be examined/considered at Revised 2 Estimates stage, keeping in view its plan fund requirements and the actual performance during the first half of the current financial year. Comments The Committee expresses its serious concern over the fact that there has been a severe curtailment of funds for the Ministry, despite the fact that there is a greater need to invest substantially to contain the phenomena of environmental degradation and global warming. The Committee feels that the Ministry has not been able to project its funds requirements to the Planning Commission properly. The Committee recommends that the Planning Commission should be properly sensitized to the issue of funds allocation, during the discussions with the Ministry, keeping in view the urgent need for environmental protection. The Committee desires that the changes effected at the R.E. stage be intimated to the Committee. 2. Recommendation (Para 5.6) The Committee feels, that due importance has not been given to the budgetary demands under heads of Ministry of Environment and Forests by the Planning Commission. The Committee has further noted that expenditure cut during revised estimate stage, sometimes are plainly arbitrary. Very often the budgeted amount is not fully utilized because of the cut imposed in the plan outlays or delays in approval of projects by Expenditure Finance Committee (EFC). In view of