Journal of Science Volume 67, Issue 1 & 2 Spring/Summer 2016 doi: 10.25778/QY29-TQ49

A New Long-tailed Weasel County Record in

Jason V. Lombardi1, Michael T. Mengak1*, Steven B. Castleberry1, V. K. Terrell1, and Mike Fies2

1Daniel B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602. 2Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Verona, VA 24482 *Corresponding Author - Email: [email protected]

ABSTRACT Though abundant throughout much of its range, the ecology and local geographic distribution of Mustela frenata (Long-tailed Weasel) is not well- known, especially in the central Appalachian Mountains. In 2015, we conducted a camera study in rock outcrop habitats within Shenandoah National Park, Virginia. Our objective was to determine the presence of mammals considered uncommon in these habitats. After 2,016 trap nights, we report eleven photographic captures of Long-tailed Weasels at eight sites. Two of these sites represent the first record of this species in Rappahannock County, Virginia. These detections represent the first record of Long-tailed Weasels in Shenandoah National Park in 60 years and extend their known range within the Park.

Mustela frenata Lichtenstein (Long-tailed Weasel), is abundant throughout most of its geographic range, which extends from southern Canada to northwestern South America (Chapman 2007). Long-tailed Weasels are considered habitat generalists, as they have been found in low-elevation agriculture areas to high-elevation (2,133 m) forests of Colorado (Chapman 2007, Quick 1949). However, their ecology and geographic distribution throughout the eastern United States as compared to other furbearer species is essentially unknown (Richter and Schauber 2006). According to the International Union for Conservation in Nature (IUCN), they are considered Stable-Least Concern throughout their geographic range (Reid and Helgren 2008). In the Central - Southern Appalachian Mountains, they are considered vulnerable in North Carolina and uncommon in West Virginia, but secure in Maryland, Tennessee and Virginia (Webster et al. 1985, Chapman 2007, WVDNR 2001). In the Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GRSM), Linzey (1994) states that this weasel is “fairly common” but lists only eight locations in a park that is nearly twice the size of Shenandoah National Park (SHEN). In SHEN, only five confirmed records of Long-tailed Weasels exist (Manville 1956). Only one other nearby record outside of the Park (e.g. Warren County, Smithsonian Conservation Center, Front Royal; Lat 38 53 42.6, Long -78 09 49.6; live capture – released alive) exists (VDGIF 2013).

Over the course of 18 weeks during the spring-early fall 2015, we conducted a camera study at 48 rock outcrop sites in SHEN. The overall objective of this project was

1

VirginiaVirginia Journal of Science,Journal Vol. of 67,Science, No. 1, 2016 Vol. 67, No. 1, 2016 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol67/iss1http://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol67/iss1 A NEW LONG-TAILED WEASEL COUNTY RECORD 4

to investigate the presence and distribution of Long-tailed Weasels, Spilogale putorius (L.) (Eastern Spotted Skunk), Neotoma magister Baird (Allegheny Woodrats), Mustela nivalis (L.) (Least Weasel), and Martes pennanti Erxleben (Fisher). In the paper, we confine our results to new records of Long-tailed Weasels. Camera sites were primarily located in rock outcrop habitat types (e.g., talus slopes, boulder fields, cliff lines & faces, and rock barrens) in both Mesophylic Quercus sp (L.) (Oak) – Carya sp. Nutt. (Hickory) and Central Oak – Pinus sp. (L.) (Pine) Forests (USGS 2011). We detected Long-Tailed Weasels at eight sites in Warren, Page, Madison and Rappahannock Counties in the North and Central districts of SHEN (Figure 1). Previously recorded locations of Long-Tailed Weasels in SHEN (Manville 1956) include 3 sites in Page County (Park Headquarters, Gravel Ridge, and Rock Spring Shelter) and 2 in Madison County (Limberlost and near Hawksbill Gap).

In Warren County, a Long-tailed Weasel was detected on 9 June 2015 at 0323 h and again on 16 September 2015 at 0003h at Dickey Hill (Elevation 744 m; 38o85’381”N, 78o20’601”W) in a Central Oak-Pine Forest near the edge of a field. Due to the inability to identify individual Long-tailed Weasels, we are uncertain whether these were the same or different individuals. In Page County, a Long-tailed Weasel was first detected at Miller’s Head Viewpoint (Elevation 991 m; 38o59’315”N, 78o39’506”W) on 3 June 2015 in a Mesophylic Oak – Hickory Forest at 0343 h. A Long-tailed Weasel was detected at a second site in Page County on 18 June 2015 at 0410 h in a closed-canopy Oak-Hickory Forest located along 140 m from Hazeltop Overlook (mile marker 52) (Elevation 1006 m; 38o47’824”N, 78o45’644”W).

In Madison County, a Long-tailed Weasel was recorded at three sites. The first detection was a location in a closed canopy Oak-Hickory Forest intermixed with Kalmia latifolia (L.) (Mountain Laurel) (Elevation 1009 m; 38o61’762”N, 78o34’817”W) where weasels were photographed on 19 July 2015 at 0433 h, 6 September 2015 at 0021 h and 9 September 2015 at 0053 h (Figure 2). The second detection was located along a trail that cuts across an exposed talus slope on (elevation 1113.1 m, 38o55’683”N, 78o39’360”W) and occurred on 23 July 2015. Interestingly, this was also the same location where we recorded the first known record of an Eastern Spotted Skunk in Madison County almost two months later (Lombardi et al. In Review). The third site was located under a Pinus rigida Mill (Pitch Pine) on a steep talus slope near the summit of Stony Man Mountain (Elevation 1637 m; 38o59’889”N, 78o37’388”W) and occurred on 8 September 2015 at 2101 hr.

In Rappahannock County, we detected a Long-tailed Weasel at two sites, which represents the first evidence of Long-tailed Weasels in the county. The first record occurred on 3 July 2015 at North Marshall Mountain (Elevation 973 m; 38o77’382”N, 78o20’788”W) along the at 0721 h in a closed canopy Oak-Pine Forest near the edge of a cliff-face heavily dominated by Mountain Laurel and Rhododendron sp. (L.) Rhododendron. The second record was located just below the Mt. Marshall Overlook (mile marker 20) (Elevation 852 m; 38o25’140”N, 78o25’140”W) at the bottom of a steep boulder field near the edge of an Oak-Hickory Forest on 12 July 2015 at 2202 h. The observations reported here represent the first documentation of Long-tailed Weasels in SHEN in sixty years, a new county record in Rappahannock County, VA and

2

Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2016 http://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol67/iss1

Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2016 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol67/iss1 5 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE

extends the known range of this species within the National Park. Given this species’ wide habitat breadth and the spatial extent of the sampling, it suggests that Long-tailed Weasels are more common in the Park than previously thought and further research and monitoring is warranted.

FIGURE 1: Detection sites for Long-tailed Weasels, classified by county, and non-detection sites in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia

3

Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2016 http://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol67/iss1

Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2016 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol67/iss1 A NEW LONG-TAILED WEASEL COUNTY RECORD 6

FIGURE 2: Photographic capture of a Long-tailed Weasel in a closed canopy Oak-Hickory Forest intermixed with Mountain Laurel in Page County, Virginia, USA on 9 September 2015 at 0053h.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the Piedmont-South Atlantic Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit of the National Park Service for providing financial support for this research. We appreciate the valuable logistical support provided by the Daniel B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources at the University of Georgia and Natural Resource Biologists from SHEN. We also thank the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries for sharing specimen records for this species in the area of interest. This project was conducted under a grant to Mengak and Castleberry; Lombardi conducted the field survey work in SHEN; Terrell is the research coordinator who provided logistical support at every stage of the project; and, Fies provided access to previous records of long-tailed weasels and advice on trapping locations.

LITERATURE CITED Chapman, B.R. 2007. Long-tailed Weasel. Pp 490-494 in M.K. Trani, W.M. Ford, and B.R. Chapman (ed.), The Land Manager’s Guide to Mammals of the South. Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC. 546 pp.

Lombardi, J.V., M.T. Mengak, and S.B. Castleberry. (In Press). Three New County Records for Eastern Spotted Skunk (Spilogale putorius) in Shenandoah National Park. Banisteria

4

Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2016 http://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol67/iss1

Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2016 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol67/iss1 7 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE

Manville, R. H. 1956. The mammals of Shenandoah National Park. Shenandoah Natural History Association, Bulletin Number 2. 72 pages. Occupancy Rates and Detection Probabilities of Red-Backed Salamanders on the National Park Service. 2015. Full species list of mammals. U.S. Department of Interior, Virginia Fall Line National Park Service, Luray, Virginia, USA. Jay D. McGhee Quick, H.F. 1949. Notes on the ecology of weasels in Gunnison County, Colorado. Journal of Mammalogy 3:281-290. Department of Natural Sciences, Northwest Missouri State University, Maryville, Missouri, 64468 Reid, F. and L. Helgren. 2008. Mustela frenta. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: Available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T41654A10529763.en. ABSTRACT Accessed 23 November 2015. To meet the conservation needs of declining amphibian populations, there is a need to assess monitoring techniques in various habitat types and Richter, S.M., and E.M. Schauber. 2006. Distribution of the Long-tailed Weasel (Mustela seasons. I assessed detection rates and proportion of area occupied via frenata) in Illinois. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science 99:153-160. transect monitoring for red-backed salamanders at a site along the Virginia Fall Line in Doswell, Virginia. I established 24 transects in a 3.2-ha area in US Geological Survey Gap Analysis Program (GAP). 2011. National Land Cover, Version 2. both riparian and upland habitats. Objects providing natural cover along these transects were sampled 3 times a week in fall and spring over a two- year period. Models of occupancy and detection were developed and VDGIF. 2013. Fish and Wildlife Information Service — Obs ID 620919, Obs Date 6 compared using Akaike’s Information Criterion. Based on 113 captures, May 201 3 model selection indicated a low fixed initial occupancy of transects with seasonal changes in colonization and extinction. Detection probability was Webster, W.D., J. F. Parnell, and W.C. Biggs Jr. 1985. Mammals of the Carolinas, Virginia, uniformly low, possibly contributing to model uncertainty in determining and Maryland. Chapel Hill, NC. 255 pp. the best explanatory variables. I infer that the increased colonization of transect cover objects during fall and increased emigration from cover West Virginia Division of Natural Resources-Wildlife Resources Section (WVDNR). objects during spring is a result of changing moisture conditions and feeding 2001. Mammals of West Virginia: A Field Checklist. South Charleston, WV. 2pp opportunities. It is likely that occupancy and detection will vary substantially for survey sites based on habitat, season, or even by transect placement, and thus managers will need to estimate these parameters for any population monitoring program of red-backed salamanders.

INTRODUCTION In view of the worldwide decline of amphibian populations and the increased interest to conserve these populations, biologists have been highly interested in developing robust monitoring methods for specific populations, habitats, or sites of conservation interest (Dodd and Barichivich, 2007; Adams et al., 2013; Petitot et al., 2014). One problem in developing these methods is that, regardless of the sampling technique, there is a possibility that an observer will fail to detect an individual of the population of interest when they are present on the sampling site. Thus, the apparent absence of a taxon could mean that members of the population of interest are truly absent from the sampling site or that they are present but not detected. Because this problem has significant implications for whether management strategies are implemented, any robust monitoring method will require the estimation of detection probabilities, the probability (ranging between 0 – 1) that an individual will be detected by a survey procedure, given that is available to be found (Schmidt, 2003). Unfortunately, the detection probability is likely to vary extensively based on a suite of environmental 5

Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2016 http://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol67/iss1 1

Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2016 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol67/iss1 Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2016 http://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol67/iss1