Summary of Comments on Microsoft Word - DRAFT Survey Instrument

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Summary of Comments on Microsoft Word - DRAFT Survey Instrument DRAFT 3-21-13 Summary of Comments on Microsoft Word - DRAFT Survey Instrument GROUP 0001 = CHILD SAMPLE (Age 8-10) 3-21-13.docx GROUP 0002 = TWEEN SAMPLE (Age 11-12) GROUP 0003 = TEEN SAMPLE (Age 13-16) Page: 1 GROUP 0004 = SURROGATE SAMPLE (Parents with children ages 8-16) Author: emizrachi Subject: Note Date: 4/2/2013 10:38:41 AM Why limit to parents with kids age 8-16? The top end age of 16 makes sense but why the low end of 8? SURROGATE QUESTIONS SHOW SUR1-SUR3 ONLY TO GROUP NUMBER 0004 (SURROGATE SAMPLE) SUR1. A. Qualifying the Parent 1. Are there any children between the ages of 8 and 16 who live in your household at least one_half of the time? Yes No SKIP TO END. Don’t know SKIP TO END. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2. Are you the parent or guardian in your household who makes at least one_half of the decisions about the child/children’s activities and the products he/she/they buys/buy? Yes SUR1.A.4 No Don’t know _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3. Can the person who is complete this survey? Yes No SKIP TO END _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4. How many children aged 8_16 are living in your household? MAX XXX _____________ (Record Number) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 DRAFT 3-21-13 This page contains no comments B. Qualifying the Child 1. IF SUR1.A.4 = 1: Please indicate the age and sex of your 8_16_year_old child who has used an iPhone, an Android smartphone, an iPod Touch, an iPad, or an Android tablet computer in the past month. Note: Popular models of Android smartphones include the Galaxy, Droid, and Nexus. Smartphones that run the Blackberry or Windows operating systems are not Android smartphones. Popular models of Android tablets include the Google Nexus, Samsung Galaxy Tab, Kindle Fire, Nook HD, and Nook Tablet. The Microsoft Surface and the Blackberry Playbook are not Android tablets, nor are portable gaming devices like a GameBoy or a PSP. Also, devices that are purely e- readers, such as the baseline Kindle or the Nook Simple Touch, are not tablets for purposes of this question. Child’s Age __________ (Record Age) Child’s Sex Boy Girl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2. IF SUR1.A.4>1: In this survey, we want to focus on just one child. To make sure we get a random sample, please indicate the age and sex of the child age 8_16 who has had the most recent birthday and who, in the past month, has used an iPhone, an Android smartphone, an iPod Touch, an iPad, or an Android tablet computer. Note: Popular models of Android smartphones include the Galaxy, Droid, and Nexus. Smartphones that run the Blackberry or Windows operating systems are not Android smartphones. Popular models of Android tablets include the Google Nexus, Samsung Galaxy Tab, Kindle Fire, Nook HD, and Nook Tablet. The Microsoft Surface and the Blackberry Playbook are not Android tablets, nor are portable gaming devices like a GameBoy or a PSP. Also, devices that are purely e- readers, such as the baseline Kindle or the Nook Simple Touch, are not tablets for purposes of this question. Child’s Age __________ (Record Age) Child’s Sex Boy Girl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 DRAFT 3-21-13 Page: 3 3. To make it easier to go through the rest of the survey, please provide the first name or initials of this Author: emizrachi Subject: Note Date: 4/2/2013 10:40:32 AM child. It seems this survey is designed for the parent to answer questions based on the device their child uses most. If true, does this create a potential bias assuming the kids mostly use their smartphone and may use that device differently than a tablet? For example, is there more parent and child interaction with a tablet, which may be under-represented by this self-selection? ______________________________________________ (RECORD THE NAME OR INITIALS OF THE CHILD) If the surrogate refuses to give the child’s name or initials, fill in “your X year-old child” for the name. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ C. Qualifying the Device 1. In the past month, which of the following devices has <CHILD’S NAME OR INITIALS> used? (Select all that apply) iPhone Android smartphone, such as the Galaxy, Droid, or Nexus iPod Touch iPad Android tablet, such as the Google Nexus, Samsung Galaxy Tab, Kindle Fire, Nook HD, or Nook Tablet Don’t know Refused Note: Popular models of Android smartphones include the Galaxy, Droid, and Nexus. Smartphones that run the Blackberry or Windows operating systems are not Android smartphones. Popular models of Android tablets include the Google Nexus, Samsung Galaxy Tab, Kindle Fire, Nook HD, and Nook Tablet. The Microsoft Surface and the Blackberry Playbook are not Android tablets, nor are portable gaming devices like a GameBoy or a PSP. Also, devices that are purely e- readers, such as the baseline Kindle or the Nook Simple Touch, are not tablets for purposes of this question. If the surrogate selects only one device in SUR1.C.1, auto punch and SKIP TO SUR2. If “Don’t know” or “Refused,” skip to END. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2. Which one of those devices has <CHILD’S NAME OR INITIALS> used most in the past month? (Select only one) iPhone Android smartphone, such as the Galaxy, Droid, or Nexus iPod Touch iPad Android tablet, such as the Google Nexus, Samsung Galaxy Tab, Kindle Fire, Nook HD, or Nook Tablet Don’t know Refused If the surrogate answers “Don’t know” or “Refused,” randomly pick one of the selected devices from SUR1.C.1 or C.2, and the remainder of the survey will focus on the child’s use of that device. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3 DRAFT 3-21-13 Page: 4 SUR2. Now we will ask you some questions about your <CHILD’S NAME OR INITIALS>’s use of the <insert device Author: emizrachi Subject: Note Date: 4/2/2013 10:45:13 AM from SUR1.C.1 or C.2>. "Sessions" may be an ambiguous term for parents and kids as relates to smart device use. In this context it seems this question seeks to find out "how many times per day" does the child use this device. But the survey is only interested in "sessions" related to movies, games and music. So picking up the phone to text or take a photo wouldn't count as a "session." This might be made clearer. A. Who is the primary user of the <insert device from SUR1.C.1 or C.2>? Child I /my spouse Child’s brother/sister Other Don’t know Refused ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------­ B. Please indicate whether <CHILD’S NAME OR INITIALS> does any of the following on the <insert device from SUR1.C.1 or C.2 >: (Select all that apply) Watches movies Listens to music Plays games using game apps (e.g., AngryfBirds or the CallfoffDuty app) None of the above Don’t know Refused If “None of the above,” “Don’t know,” or “Refused,” SKIP TO END. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------­ C. Frequency Questions 1. How often, in a typical week, does <CHILD’S NAME OR INITIALS> use the <insert device from SUR1.C.1 or C.2 >? (Select one) 7 days a week 6 days a week 5 days a week 4 days a week 3 days a week 2 days a week 1 day a week Does not use it weekly Don’t know Refused ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------­ 2. On a typical day that <CHILD’S NAME OR INITIALS> uses the <insert device from SUR1.C.1 or C.2 >, how many sessions per day does <CHILD’S NAME OR INITIALS> use it? MAX XXX __________ (Record Number) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 DRAFT 3-21-13 Page: 5 3. How long, in a typical session, does <CHILD’S NAME OR INITIALS> use the <insert device from Author: emizrachi Subject: Note Date: 4/2/2013 10:47:50 AM SUR1.C.1 or C.2>? (Select one) We assume the point here is to determine parental familiarity (or lack thereof) with the titles of the game apps their kids play. Why aren't similar questions related to movies, TV shows and music being asked? Author: emizrachi Subject: Note Date: 4/2/2013 2:49:21 PM Less than 30 minutes We find that "rating system" is sometimes confused with the 5-star ratings that help users determine how popular an app is. We suggest clarifying this by either specifying "age 30 to 45 minutes and/or content rating system" or changing "they do or do not want..." to "they feel are suitable for their child's age" 46 minutes to less than 1 hour Also, this question presumes that the purpose of the app store's rating system is to help parents, which isn't explicitly said by app stores. 1 hour to less than 2 hours 2 hours to less than 3 hours 3 hours to less than 4 hours 4 hours to less than 5 hours 5 hours or more Don’t know Refused ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------­
Recommended publications
  • Money from Music: Survey Evidence on Musicians’ Revenue and Lessons About Copyright Incentives
    MONEY FROM MUSIC: SURVEY EVIDENCE ON MUSICIANS’ REVENUE AND LESSONS ABOUT COPYRIGHT INCENTIVES Peter DiCola* According to the incentive theory of copyright, financial rewards are what the public trades for the production of creative works. To know whether this quid pro quo is working, one needs to know how much the creators are getting from the bargain. Based on an original, nationwide survey of more than 5,000 musicians, this Article addresses one of the key links in the incentive theory’s chain of logic. For most musicians, copyright does not provide much of a direct financial reward for what they are producing currently. The survey findings are instead consistent with a winner-take-all or superstar model in which copyright motivates musicians through the promise of large rewards in the future in the rare event of wide popularity. * Associate Professor, Northwestern University School of Law. A.B. 1998, Princeton University; J.D. 2005, Ph.D. (Economics) 2009, University of Michigan. I am grateful to my colleagues Jean Cook and Kristin Thomson of the Future of Music Coalition. We worked together to develop and analyze the Internet survey of musicians discussed in this Article, and I have benefited greatly from our discussions as a research team. The views expressed in this Article are my own, however, and not those of Jean, Kristin, or Future of Music Coalition. My thanks to Ken Ayotte, Scott Baker, Shari Diamond, Zev Eigen, Josh Fischman, Ezra Friedman, William Hubbard, Jessica Litman, Anup Malani, Mark McKenna, Tom Miles, Max Schanzenbach, and Avishalom Tor for helpful comments and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut DEEP's List of Compliant Electronics Manufacturers Notice to Connecticut Retailersi
    Connecticut DEEP’s List of Compliant Electronics manufacturers Notice to Connecticut Retailersi: This list below identifies electronics manufacturers that are in compliance with the registration and payment obligations under Connecticut’s State-wide Electronics Program. Retailers must check this list before selling Covered Electronic Devices (“CEDs”) in Connecticut. If there is a brand of a CED that is not listed below including retail over the internet, the retailer must not sell the CED to Connecticut consumers pursuant to section 22a-634 of the Connecticut General Statutes. Manufacturer Brands CED Type Acer America Corp. Acer Computer, Monitor, Television, Printer eMachines Computer, Monitor Gateway Computer, Monitor, Television ALR Computer, Monitor Gateway 2000 Computer, Monitor AG Neovo Technology AG Neovo Monitor Corporation Amazon Fulfillment Service, Inc. Kindle Computers Amazon Kindle Kindle Fire Fire American Future Technology iBuypower Computer Corporation dba iBuypower Apple, Inc. Apple Computer, Monitor, Printer NeXT Computer, Monitor iMac Computer Mac Pro Computer Mac Mini Computer Thunder Bolt Display Monitor Archos, Inc. Archos Computer ASUS Computer International ASUS Computer, Monitor Eee Computer Nexus ASUS Computer EEE PC Computer Atico International USA, Inc. Digital Prism Television ATYME CORPRATION, INC. ATYME Television Bang & Olufsen Operations A/S Bang & Olufsen Television BenQ America Corp. BenQ Monitor Best Buy Insignia Television Dynex Television UB Computer Toshiba Television VPP Matrix Computer, Monitor Blackberry Limited Balckberry PlayBook Computer Bose Corp. Bose Videowave Television Brother International Corp. Brother Monitor, Printer Canon USA, Inc. Canon Computer, Monitor, Printer Oce Printer Imagistics Printer Cellco Partnership Verizon Ellipsis Computer Changhong Trading Corp. USA Changhong Television (Former Guangdong Changhong Electronics Co. LTD) Craig Electronics Craig Computer, Television Creative Labs, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Music Industry in the Social Networking Era
    THE MUSIC INDUSTRY IN THE SOCIAL NETWORKING ERA By Xi Yue A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Telecommunication, Information Studies and Media 2011 Abstract THE MUSIC INDUSTRY IN THE SOCIAL NETWORKING ERA By Xi Yue Music has long been a pillar of profit in the entertainment industry, and an indispensable part in many people’s daily lives around the world. The emergence of digital music and Internet file sharing, spawned by rapid advancement in information and communication technologies (ICT), has had a huge impact on the industry. Music sales in the U.S., the largest national market in the world, were cut in half over the past decade. After a quick look back at the pre-digital music market, this thesis provides an overview of the music industry in the digital era. The thesis continues with an exploration of three motivating questions that look at social networking sites as a possible major outlet and platform for musical artists and labels. A case study of a new social networking music service is presented and, in conclusion, thoughts on a general strategy for the digital music industry are presented. Table of Contents List of Figures................................................................................................................................ iv List of Tables................................................................................................................................... v Introduction....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Illegal File Sharing
    ILLEGAL FILE SHARING The sharing of copyright materials such as MUSIC or MOVIES either through P2P (peer-to-peer) file sharing or other means WITHOUT the permission of the copyright owner is ILLEGAL and can have very serious legal repercussions. Those found GUILTY of violating copyrights in this way have been fined ENORMOUS sums of money. Accordingly, the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted materials is PROHIBITED at Bellarmine University. The list of sites below is provided by Educause and some of the sites listed provide some or all content at no charge; they are funded by advertising or represent artists who want their material distributed for free, or for other reasons. Remember that just because content is free doesn't mean it's illegal. On the other hand, you may find websites offering to sell content which are not on the list below. Just because content is not free doesn't mean it's legal. Legal Alternatives for Downloading • ABC.com TV Shows • [adult swim] Video • Amazon MP3 Downloads • Amazon Instant Video • AOL Music • ARTISTdirect Network • AudioCandy • Audio Lunchbox • BearShare • Best Buy • BET Music • BET Shows • Blackberry World • Blip.fm • Blockbuster on Demand • Bravo TV • Buy.com • Cartoon Network Video • Zap2it • Catsmusic • CBS Video • CD Baby • Christian MP Free • CinemaNow • Clicker (formerly Modern Feed) • Comedy Central Video • Crackle • Criterion Online • The CW Video • Dimple Records • DirecTV Watch Online • Disney Videos • Dish Online • Download Fundraiser • DramaFever • The Electric Fetus • eMusic.com
    [Show full text]
  • Compatible Ebook Devices
    Current as of 5/1/2012. For the most up-to-date list, visit overdrive.com/eBookdevices. Library Compatible eBook Devices eBooks from your library’s ‘Virtual Branch’ website powered by OverDrive® are currently compatible with a variety of readers, computers and devices. eBook readers Amazon® Kindle Sony® Other devices (U.S. libraries only) • Kindle • Daily Edition • Aluratek LIBRE • Kindle 2 • Pocket Edition Air/Color/Touch • Kindle 3 • PRS-505 • En Tourage Pocket eDGe™ • Kindle DX • PRS-700 • iRiver Story HD • Kindle Touch • Touch Edition • Literati™ Reader • Kindle Keyboard • Wi-Fi PRS-T1 • Pandigital® Novel ® ™ • PocketBook Pro 602 Barnes & Noble Kobo • Skytex Primer • NOOK™ 3G+Wi-Fi • Kobo eReader The process to download • NOOK Wi-Fi • Kobo Touch or transfer eBooks to these • NOOKcolor™ devices may vary by device, most require Adobe • NOOK Touch™ Digital Editions. • NOOK Tablet Mobile devices ™ Get the FREE OverDrive Media Console app for: Other devices BlackBerry® iPad®, iPhone® & iPod touch® Android™ • Acer Iconia • Nextbook™ Next 2 ™ ® • Agasio Dropad • Pandigital Nova Windows ™ ™ Phone 7 • Archos Tablets • Samsung Galaxy Tab • ASUS® Transformer • Sony Tablet S • Coby Kyros • Sylvania Mini Tablet • Cruz™ Reader/Tablet • Toshiba Thrive™ • Dell Streak • ViewSonic gTablet • EnTourage eDGe™ • Kindle Fire ...or use the FREE Available in Mobihand™ Available in the Available in • Kobo Vox Kindle reading app on ™ SM & AppWorld App Store Android Market • Motorola® Xoom™ many of these devices. Computers Install the FREE Adobe Digital Editions software to download and read eBooks on your computer and transfer to eBook readers. Windows® XP, Vista or 7 Mac OS X v10.4.9 (or newer) OverDrive and your library are not affiliated with and do not endorse any of the devices or manufacturers listed above.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing Violent Entertainment to Children Report
    MARKETING VIOLENT ENTERTAINMENT TO CHILDREN: A REVIEW OF SELF-REGULATION AND INDUSTRY PRACTICES IN THE MOTION PICTURE, MUSIC RECORDING & ELECTRONIC GAME INDUSTRIES REPORT OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 2000 Federal Trade Commission Robert Pitofsky, Chairman Sheila F. Anthony Commissioner Mozelle W. Thompson Commissioner Orson Swindle Commissioner Thomas B. Leary Commissioner TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................1 A. President’s June 1, 1999 Request for a Study and the FTC’s Response ........................................................1 B. Public Concerns About Entertainment Media Violence ...................1 C. Overview of the Commission’s Study ..................................2 Focus on Self-Regulation ...........................................2 Structure of the Report .............................................3 Sources .........................................................4 II. THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY SELF-REGULATORY SYSTEM .......4 A. Scope of Commission’s Review ......................................5 B. Operation of the Motion Picture Self-Regulatory System .................6 1. The rating process ..........................................6 2. Review of advertising for content and rating information .........8 C. Issues Not Addressed by the Motion Picture Self-Regulatory System .......10 1. Accessibility of reasons for ratings ............................10 2. Advertising placement
    [Show full text]
  • A Future Projection of Hardware, Software, and Market Trends of Tablet Computers
    A Future Projection of Hardware, Software, and Market Trends of Tablet computers Honors Project In fulfillment of the Requirements for The Esther G. Maynor Honors College University of North Carolina at Pembroke By Christopher R. Hudson Department of Mathematics and Computer Science April 15,2013 Name Date Honors CoUege Scholar Name Date Faculty Mentor Mark Nfalewicz,/h.D. / /" Date Dean/Esther G/Maynor Honors College Acknowledgments We are grateful to the University of North Carolina Pembroke Department of Computer Science for the support of this research. We are also grateful for assistance with editing by Jordan Smink. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract........................................................................................................................................... 1 Background..................................................................................................................................... 2 Materials and Methods.................................................................................................................... 3 Results……..................................................................................................................................... 5 Discussion...................................................................................................................................... 8 References..................................................................................................................................... 10 iii List of Tables Table 1 Page 7
    [Show full text]
  • The Spotify Paradox: How the Creation of a Compulsory License Scheme for Streaming On-Demand Music Platforms Can Save the Music Industry
    UCLA UCLA Entertainment Law Review Title The Spotify Paradox: How the Creation of a Compulsory License Scheme for Streaming On-Demand Music Platforms Can Save the Music Industry Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7n4322vm Journal UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 22(1) ISSN 1073-2896 Author Richardson, James H. Publication Date 2014 DOI 10.5070/LR8221025203 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Spotify Paradox: How the Creation of a Compulsory License Scheme for Streaming On-Demand Music Platforms Can Save the Music Industry James H. Richardson* I. INTRODUCTION �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������46 II. ILLEGAL DOWNLOADING LOCALLY STORED MEDIA, AND THE RISE OF STREAMING MUSIC ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������47 A. The Digitalization of Music, and the Rise of Locally Stored Content. ......47 B. The Road to Legitimacy: Digital Media in Light of A&M Records, Inc. ..48 C. Legitimacy in a Sea of Piracy: The iTunes Music Store. ...........................49 D. Streaming and the Future of Digital Music Service. ���������������������������������50 III. THE COPYRIGHT AND DIGITALIZATION �������������������������������������������������������������������51 A. Statutory Background ................................................................................51 B. Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings Act ................................52
    [Show full text]
  • 3 of 9 1 Guitar Techniques, Rythms, Chords, New Songs
    Q2. What new thing has aroused your curiosity in the last month? 1 Guitar techniques, rythms, chords, new songs May 29, 2012 2:25 AM 2 Jewelled Squid. May 29, 2012 12:35 AM 3 Jazz music May 28, 2012 6:21 PM 4 Floating collections, Freegal, RDA, etc. May 28, 2012 2:38 PM 5 Animal boarding services May 27, 2012 7:25 AM 6 Genealogy May 22, 2012 9:40 AM 7 Sharepoint May 21, 2012 4:44 PM 8 Pinterest May 21, 2012 12:51 PM 9 Geysers in Yellowstone, bumblebee nests, the Catholic Pope granting May 18, 2012 1:23 PM overlordship of Ireland to the English as a way to ensure that the Irish Catholic Church would be reformed. 10 What is borage and how to you use ti? What and when to harvest? May 18, 2012 11:56 AM 11 History of china May 17, 2012 2:22 PM 12 Google Analytics May 17, 2012 2:33 AM 13 What is the history and purpose of the Alpha Theta fraternity? Are there tutorials May 16, 2012 1:58 PM for using Audacity to edit recordings? 14 LibGuides/LibAnswers use at different colleges May 16, 2012 12:12 PM 15 iPad May 14, 2012 6:23 AM 16 e-readers May 12, 2012 2:41 PM 17 Online magazines May 12, 2012 11:32 AM 18 vapassina meditation May 11, 2012 9:42 AM 19 nodding disease May 11, 2012 6:57 AM 20 Slyvia Plath May 10, 2012 4:09 PM 21 online education May 10, 2012 3:41 PM 22 songs for children to sing to their mothers in front of the Church congregation on May 10, 2012 12:58 PM Mother's Day 23 Microsofts deal with Barnes and Noble May 10, 2012 12:43 PM 24 What is a sardonic expression and the definition for facetious.
    [Show full text]
  • Barnes & Noble NOOK Tablet User Guide
    Barnes & Noble, Inc. 122 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10011 USA. © 2010-2012 Barnes & Noble, Inc. All rights reserved. NOOK®, NOOK Book™, NOOK Bookstore™, NOOK Developer™, NOOK Friends™, NOOK Kids™, NOOK Magazine™, NOOK Newspaper™, NOOK Newsstand™, NOOK Store™, NOOK Study™, NOOK Tablet™, AliveTouch™, LendMe®, ArticleView™, Daily Shelf™, PagePerfect™, VividView™, Read and Play™, Read and Record™, Read In Store™, Read to Me™, More In Store™, Free Friday™, PubIt!™, Lifetime Library™, Read What You Love. Anywhere You Like™, Read Forever™, and Touch the Future of Reading™ are trademarks of Barnes & Noble, Inc. Patent Pending. Screenshots and product images are simulated and for instructional purposes only. They may differ from the actual product and are subject to change without notice. Content shown may vary from actual available content, which may change without notice. Your use of NOOK is subject to the NOOK Terms of Service located in this User Guide and here: www.nook.com/tablet/legal. Contains Reader® Mobile technology by Adobe Systems Incorporated. All trademarks or registered trademarks that are not the property of Barnes & Noble or its affiliates are the property of their respective owners. Model BNTV250, Model BNTV250A Version: 1.4.3.A Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 9 Contact Us .......................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Censorship of Popular Music: an Analysis of Lyrical Content. PUB DATE Jul 95 NOTE 38P.; Masters Research Paper, Kent State University
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 390 402 IR 055 749 AUTHOR Anthony, Kathleen S. TITLE Censorship of Popular Music: An Analysis of Lyrical Content. PUB DATE Jul 95 NOTE 38p.; Masters Research Paper, Kent State University. PUB TYPE Dissertations/Theses Undetermined (040) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DELCRIPTORS Art; *Censorship; *Content Analysis; Moral Values; Obscenity; *Popular Music; Rock Music; Tables (Data) IDENTIFIERS *Lyrics; Rap Music ABSTRACT This study analyzes the lyrical content of popular music recordings, cited as censored from 1986 through 1995, in order to examine chavacteristics of the recordings that were found to be objectionable and the frequency with which the objections occurred. Out of 60 articles from the music trade magazines, "Billboard" and "Rolling Stone," 77 instances of censorship were recorded and analyzed. The categories for evaluation were the year of citation, music style, and reason for censorship. Nineteen ninety was the year with the highest number of journal articles (21) covering music censorship. Rap (487.) and rock (44.27.) music accounted for a large portion of the total censored recordings and the majority of recordings were censored because of lyrics seen as explicit, profane, obscene or vulgar. In addition, five rock recordings were censored because of objectionable artwork on or inside the covers. Recordings were also censored because of opposition to a view the artist expressed. Two tables depict the years of citation and the reasons for censorship, each according to music styles. Appendices contain a list of the music censorship articles and a coding form for the year of citation, music style, and reason for censorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Client Opportunities
    Client Opportunities Partner Companies □ INgrooves Music Group □ Dropcards (download cards) Indie Extreme A la Carte Services □ DiscMakers (CD Replication) □ Harry Fox Agency Advertising □ April Sound Entertainment Group □ Facebook ad campaigns □ Tom Jackson Productions □ Banner ads, etc □ Amazon Store – physical CDs Consulting/Artist Launch Radio Related □ Strategic Marketing/Business Plan □ Outbound Music □ Pandora Radio Submission Recording Development □ Slacker Radio Submission □ Producer Access □ iTunes Radio Submission □ Song Selection Assistance □ iHeartRadio Submission □ Executive Producer Service Showcase Submission Opportunities Branding Development □ Film Festivals □ CD Artwork □ Music Festivals □ T-shirt Design □ One-sheet Creation Time Savers □ Poster/Postcard Design □ DropBox □ Website Design □ Newsletter Template Design Web Presences □ Logo Design □ All Media Guide Submission □ Banner Ads □ Apple Music □ Print Ad Template □ GraceNote □ Shazam Radio □ Instagram, Twitter, Reverbnation,,etc □ Internet Radio Campaigns □ International Radio Campaigns IE Shopping Cart System □ Radio Campaign Management □ Artist Website integration □ Artist Facebook integration □ Fulfillment on merch/CD sales Sync Licensing □ Play Network Sales/Airplay Tracking □ Music Supervisor.com □ BDS □ Various Music Library submissions □ MediaBase □ SoundScan □ SoundExchange INgrooves Music Publishing Admin Service □ Sync Licensing Opps □ Song catalog Management □ Neighboring Rights Collection Rdio INgrooves Worldwide R2G (China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macao)
    [Show full text]