DOCSLIB.ORG

Lightning Influence on Ionosphere and Magnetosphere Plasma

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lightning Influence on Ionosphere and Magnetosphere Plasma Lightning Influence on Ionosphere and Magnetosphere Plasma Lightning Whistler Wave Characteristics. High Amplitude Lightning Waves Lightning is one of the most powerful natural Detected. The first vector electric field phenomena, with energy release rates of which experiment on ionospheric rockets, flown can be over 1011 Watts . We have known about directly over thunderstorms, was reported in ionospheric and magnetospheric VLF (Very 1985 (Kelley et al, 1985) where it was reported Low Frequency) plasma whistler waves since that the measured, lightning-generated whistler the 1950s and 1960s (see Helliwell, 1965), and mode waves were much larger in amplitude than even about lightning-generated ion whistler predicted (e.g. Park and Dejnakarintra, 1973). waves since the early years of the space Since then several rocket flights have been program (see Gurnett et al, 1965). The well conducted over thunderstorms to study the developed theory of the coupling of upward coupling of lightning generated electromagnetic waves from lightning into emissions into the ionosphere. Li (1993) whistler mode electromagnetic plasma waves, showed that over 85% of lightning events within and the subsequent propagation in the 1,500 km of a rocket subtract resulted in upward ionosphere and magnetosphere has allowed the going whistler waves detected at the rocket. use of whistlers to study magnetospheric Helliwell (1965) had already shown that these dynamics. For instance, one can use whistler waves, once coupled into a whistler mode duct motion to estimate magnetospheric electric plasma wave, would refract into the vertical fields (Helliwell, 1965). For these studies, it because of the strongly horizontally stratified was shown that the whistlers propagated in ionospheric electron density. Indeed, the plasma ducts within the magnetosphere and then whistler waveforms detected by Kelley et al coupled back into an electromagnetic wave to (1985) and all subsequent such experiments, reach the ground based receiver. It was generally showed that the whistlers were very assumed that this required some wave coherent, having only a single monofrequency amplification process for significant at each moment of time, thus indicating that magnetospheric propagation, so the lightning there had been only one path to the rocket - whistler waves were consider like 'test' waves namely vertically straight up. So, the picture which were amplified in the unstable plasma at emerged that every lightning event generates the expense of free energy in the particle strong electromagnetic wave in the earth- distributions (through strong coupling to the ionosphere waveguide which couples into trapped electron populations, for instance.). whistler mode waves over large areas (at least These ducted whistler waves were relatively 2500 km, see Holzworth et al, 1999.) Indeed, rarely detected (compared to the number of the low frequency part of these waves (between, lightning strokes), and therefore our main say, 500 Hz and 2 kHz, say) can propagate right knowledge of these waves required both a duct out to the magnetopause (Holzworth et al, 1999). and magnetospheric amplification, in order for The vast majority of these waves are found to be the waves to be detected on the ground, or to propagating as oblique whistlers, and are not cause particle pitch angle scattering resulting in necessarily captured in any magnetospheric precipitation such as 'Trimpi' events (Carpenter plasma duct. Note that once inside the et al, 1984). magnetosphere, these whistler mode waves do not easily couple back down to the ground, but rather can bounce around between the (Woodman and Kudeki, 1982) that lightning ionosphere and the magnetopause and become can trigger explosive ionospheric plasma completely phase mixed as they combine with density perturbations called Spread-F (where the other such lightning generated VLF waves. ionospheric radar returns echos from multiple Recent Advancements. Results from the layers simultaneously with the same frequency.) Demeter (cf. Berthelier et al, 2008) and Indeed the study of these ionospheric C/NOFS (Holzworth et al, 2010) are providing irregularities is a major reason for the C/NOFS new evidence for the importance of lightning to satellite (De la Beaujardiere et al, 2004). ionosphere and magnetosphere plasma Now the importance of lightning to the processes. We have known since 1982 irregularities is becoming stronger with results showing that lightning can be the largest electric Electric field, optical lightning and density measurements on C/NOFS at 450 km Altitude. Blue lines are WWLLN lightning times. Electron density was < 100/cc in the event. equatorial ionospheric depletions, Nature Geoscience V.1, Feb 2008 Field signal in deep density cavities associated de La Beaujardiere, et al, C. ,C/NOFS: a with spread-F. This implies that lightning may mission to forecast scintillations, Journal of be a more important stimulator of ionospheric Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, irregularities than previously anticipated. Such v 66, n 17, Nov. 2004, p 1573-91 perturbations are thought to be a primary driver Carpenter, D.L.; Inan, U.S.; Trimpi, M.L,. for radio scintillation which affects radio Helliwell, R.A.; Katsufrakis, J.P. communication and GPS signals as they pass Perturbations of subionospheric LF and MF through the ionosphere. signals due to whistler-induced electron Suggestion for Future Work. Lightning precipitation bursts, Journal of Geophysical has been shown to be much more important to Research, v 89, n A11, 9857-62, 1 Nov. ionospheric and magnetospheric phenomena 1984 than previously considered. Lightning is very Gurnett, D. A., S. D. Shawhan, N. M. Brice and powerful, happens all the time (40 to 80 strokes R. L. Smith, Ion Cyclotron Whistlers, J. per second globally), penetrates the ionosphere Geophys. Res. 70(7), 1965. with every stroke, and propagates as plasma Helliwell, R. A, Whistlers and related wave energy all the way to the magnetopause. ionospheric phenomena, Stanford U. Press, Yet traditionally, space scientists have not 1965. considered lightning to be energetically Holzworth, R. H., R. M. Winglee, B. H. Barnum and important to ionospheric and magnetospheric YaQi Li, Lightning whistler waves in the high- dynamics. latitude magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 104, Consider that some of the strongest plasma 17369, 1999 waves in the magnetosphere are so called hiss Kelley, M. C, et al, Electrical Measurements waves (banded whistler mode emissions around in the Atmosphere and in the Ionosphere a few kHz.) The plasmaspheric hiss is likely over an Active Thunderstorm, 1. Campaign strongly linked to phase mixed, and multiple Overview and initial ionospheric results, reflected lightning-generated whistler waves. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 9815-23, 1985 Yet, we do not know what is the energy input Li, Ya Qi, Ionospheric VLF waves and optical into the magnetosphere from lightning. These phenomena over active thunderstorms, Ph.D. waves may be the dominant source of pitch thesis, Univ. of Washington, 1993. angle scattering and subsequent precipitation of Park, C.G. Dejnakarintra, M., Penetration of energetic, trapped particles in the thundercloud electric fields into the magnetosphere: i.e. a major loss mechanism for ionosphere and magnetosphere. I. Middle the radiation belts. These strong plasma waves and subauroral latitudes Jl of Geophysical may be important in other wave particle Research, v 78, n 28, p 6623-33, 1 Oct. 1973 interactions such as reconnection at the Turman, B.N., Detection of Lightning magnetopause, or triggering of stimulated Superbolts, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 2566, 1977. emissions in the magnetosphere and ionosphere. Woodman, R. F. And E. Kudeki, A causal relationship between lightning and explosive References: spread F, Geophys. Res. Lett., v 11, n 12, p J.-J. Berthelier*, M. Malingre, R. Pfaff, E. 1165-7, Dec. 1984 Seran, R. Pottelette, J. Jasperse, J.-P. Lebreton and M. Parrot, Lightning-induced plasma turbulence and ion heating in .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Study of the Phenomenon of Whistler Echoes
    RADIO SCIENCE Journal of Research NBS jUSNC- URSI Vol. 69D, No. 3, March 1965 Study of the Phenomenon of Whistler Echoes T. Laaspere, W. C. Johnson, and J. F. Walkup Contribution From the Radiophysics Laboratory, Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H. (Received July 6, 1964; revi sed Nove mbe r 5, 1964) In considering the propagation of long whistle rs and whistle r echo trains, the question arises about where the downcoming whistlers are refle cted. The several s uggestions that have been made include ground reflection and refl ection at the lowe r boundary of the ionosphere. In either case, the echo of a daytime whistler would make several more passes through the absorbing V region than the whistler itself, a nd we should expect whistl ers occurring a round noon to have a much smaller probabil­ ity of havin g echoes than whistlers occurring at ni ght. An analysis of several years of data obt ained a t the Da rtmouth Co ll ege whistl e r stati on yield s the result, however, that although the ave rage whi stl er rate is muc h hi ghe r at ni ght than during the day, the probability of a whi stl er having a n echo shows little cha nge from midnight to midday. Consistent with this observati on are the results of anoth er study showing that the diffe rence in the intensity of a noo ntime whis tle r and its echo may be onl y a few decibels. If th e th eoreti cal predicti ons about absorption of whi s tle r-mode waves a re even nearly correct, our results on whi stl e r echoes a re in compatible with the lowe r-boundary or ground·re fl ecti on model.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Guiding Mechanism of Whistler Radio Waves Saburo Adachi
    RADIO SCIENCE Journal of Research NBSjUSNC-URSI Vol. 69D, No.4, April 1965 Study on the Guiding Mechanism of Whistler Radio Waves Saburo Adachi Deparbnent of Electrical Communications, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (Received October 14, 1964; revised November 23, 1964) A full wave theory is applied to the whistler radio wave propagation along a plasma slab with an enhanced or depressed plasma density which is imbedded in an infinite magnetoplasma. Rigorous dispersion equation is solved for a thin slab in approximate but explicit forms. Three types of propagation modes are found: (a) a completely trapped surface wave mode along the depressed slab in the frequency region above a half of gyrofrequency and below a gyrofrequenc y, (b) a com· pletely trapped surface wave mode along the highly enhanced slab in the frequency region above a half of gyrofrequency and below a certain cutoff frequency less than a gyrofrequency, and (c) a partially trapped (leaky) surface wave mode along th e enhanced slab in the freque ncy region above a certain cutoff frequency and below a half of gyrofrequenc y. Di s· persion properti es, fi eld di stributions and an attenuation of the third mode due to th e leakage of the transmitted power are discussed in detail. The attenuation is found to in crease very rapidly wit.h increasing frequency, thickness and enhancement of ionization of th e slab. The exact numerical solutions are also obtained and compared with the approximate solutions. 1. Introduction A number of theoretical investigations have been made on the propagation of whis tler radio waves since the publication of Storey's famous paper [Storey, 1953], and not a few papers have dealt with the propagation path and the guiding mechanism of the whistlers.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation of Ionospheric Precursors of Earthquakes—Probable Mechanism and Its Substantiation
    Open Journal of Earthquake Research, 2020, 9, 142-169 https://www.scirp.org/journal/ojer ISSN Online: 2169-9631 ISSN Print: 2169-9623 Formation of Ionospheric Precursors of Earthquakes—Probable Mechanism and Its Substantiation Georgii Lizunov1, Tatiana Skorokhod1, Masashi Hayakawa2, Valery Korepanov3 1Space Research Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine 2Hayakawa Institute of Seismo Electromagnetics Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan 3Lviv Center of Institute for Space Research, Lviv, Ukraine How to cite this paper: Lizunov, G., Sko- Abstract rokhod, T., Hayakawa, M. and Korepanov, V. (2020) Formation of Ionospheric Pre- The purpose of this article is to attract the attention of the scientific commu- cursors of Earthquakes—Probable Me- nity to atmospheric gravity waves (GWs) as the most likely mechanism for chanism and Its Substantiation. Open the transfer of energy from the surface layers of the atmosphere to space Journal of Earthquake Research, 9, 142-169. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2020.92009 heights and describe the channel of seismic-ionospheric relations formed in this way. The article begins with a description and critical comparison of sev- Received: October 20, 2019 eral basic mechanisms of action on the ionosphere from below: the propaga- Accepted: March 13, 2020 tion of electromagnetic radiation; the closure of the atmospheric currents Published: March 16, 2020 through the ionosphere; the penetration of waves throughout the neutral at- Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and mosphere. A further part of the article is devoted to the analysis of theoretical Scientific Research Publishing Inc. and experimental information relating to the actual GWs. Simple analytical This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International expressions are written that allow one to calculate the parameters of GWs in License (CC BY 4.0).
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Correlation Between Lightning Strikes and Whistler Observations
    234 South African Journal of Science 105, May/June 2009 Research Letters lightning is most prevalent here, whistlers are very rare. At Spatial correlation between medium latitudes whistlers become far more common. Whistlers recorded in this region have the general characteristics of higher lightning strikes and whistler frequencies arriving before the lower frequencies. These whistlers observations from Tihany, propagate mainly through the plasmasphere. At higher latitudes the whistlers have a distinct nose-frequency. This means that Hungary after the initial frequency a signal of both rising and descending frequencies will be recorded. However, due to the rare occurrence of lightning at high latitudes, whistlers are fairly uncommon a,b,c* a,d a J. Öster , A.B. Collier , A.R.W. Hughes , compared to middle latitudes. b e L.G. Blomberg and J. Lichtenberger The specific shape of a whistler is determined by the plasma density and strength of the magnetic field in the duct. Whereas the former principally determines the propagation delay, the latter dictates the frequency of minimum delay. Whistlers A whistler is a very low frequency (VLF) phenomenon that acquires generated at higher latitudes spend more time in the duct thus its characteristics from dispersive propagation in the magneto- experiencing greater dispersion. sphere. Whistlers are derived from the intense VLF radiation The focus of this study was to examine the relationship produced in lightning strikes, which can travel great distances between whistlers and lightning strikes. This was achieved by within the Earth-ionosphere waveguide (EIWG) before penetrating performing correlation calculations between a whistler data set the ionosphere, and exciting a duct.
    [Show full text]
  • Dependence of Whistler Activity on Geomagnetic Latitude* MANORAN]AN RAO
    Indian Journal of Radio & Space Physics Vol. 1, June 1971, pp. 192·194 Dependence of Whistler Activity on Geomagnetic Latitude* MANORAN]AN RAO. LALMANI, V. V. SOMAYA]ULU & B. A. P. TANTRY Electronics & Radio Physics Laboratory, Department of Physics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 5 ManuscriPt received 16 March 1972 It is shown that the couplin~ between the ordinary and extraordinary magneto-ionic waves in the lower ionospheric regions should also be considered as one of the factors which control the dependence of whistler activity on the ~eoma~netic latitude. Introduction In this communication we wish to point out that the coupling between the ordmary and extraordi• nafY magneto-ionic waves in the lOWEr ionsphelic latitudinal variation of the whi:;tler occur• layers siouid also ie considered as one of the factors OUR knowledge of the diurnal, seasonal and rence is derived mainly from the synoptic which control the dependence vf whistler activity observations made at a chain of stations under on the geomagnetic latitude. We also show t.rat the whistler-eastl and whistler-west .networks2,3 the dependmce of the coupling parameter 011 the during the IGY and IGC periods. An important latitude satisfaCtorily exphJins the observed whistler feature of the latitudinal variation of the whistlel activity. Towards this end ",e first derive the ex• activity if:: the high whistler rate occurrence ob· pression for the coupling parameter following the selVed at high geomagnetic latitudes in contrast to treatment given by Budden9 and tben briefly dis• the low rate at low geomagnetic latitudes4•5• A cuss the physical mechanism of the coupling pheno• part of the observed latitudinal variaticn in wbistlEr menon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Properties of Lion Roars and Electron Dynamics in Mirror Mode
    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics RESEARCH ARTICLE The Properties of Lion Roars and Electron Dynamics in Mirror 10.1002/2017JA024551 Mode Waves Observed by the Magnetospheric Special Section: MultiScale Mission Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) Mission Results Throughout the First Primary H. Breuillard1 ,O.LeContel1 , T. Chust1, M. Berthomier1, A. Retino1 , D. L. Turner2 , Mission Phase R. Nakamura3 , W. Baumjohann3 , G. Cozzani1, F. Catapano1, A. Alexandrova1, L. Mirioni1 , D. B. Graham4 , M. R. Argall5 , D. Fischer3 , F. D. Wilder6 , D. J. Gershman7 , A. Varsani3 , Key Points: 8 4 8 6 6 • Intense lion roars are observed in P.-A. Lindqvist , Yu. V. Khotyaintsev , G. Marklund ,R.E.Ergun , K. A. Goodrich , mirror modes by high time N. Ahmadi6 , J. L. Burch9 , R. B. Torbert5 , G. Needell5 , M. Chutter5 ,D.Rau5 , resolution instruments on board I. Dors5 , C. T. Russell10 , W. Magnes3 , R. J. Strangeway10 , K. R. Bromund7 ,H.Wei10 , Magnetospheric MultiScale mission • Nonlinear lion roars are observed up F. Plaschke3 , B. J. Anderson11 ,G.Le7 , T. E. Moore7 , B. L. Giles7 , W. R. Paterson7 , . to 0 4fce due to their high amplitude, C. J. Pollock7 , J. C. Dorelli7,L.A.Avanov7 , Y. Saito12 , B. Lavraud13 , S. A. Fuselier9 , which may have been underestimated 11 11 1 in previous studies B. H. Mauk , I. J. Cohen , and J. F. Fennell • Possible signatures of linear and 1 nonlinear resonant interaction Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas, UMR7648, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Univ. Paris-Sud, between lion roars and electrons,
    [Show full text]
  • Electron Beams As the Source of Whistler‐Mode Auroral Hiss at Saturn A
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 37, L09102, doi:10.1029/2010GL042980, 2010 Click Here for Full Article Electron beams as the source of whistler‐mode auroral hiss at Saturn A. J. Kopf,1 D. A. Gurnett,1 J. D. Menietti,1 P. Schippers,1 C. S. Arridge,2,3 G. B. Hospodarsky,1 W. S. Kurth,1 S. Grimald,4 N. André,4 A. J. Coates,2,3 and M. K. Dougherty5 Received 23 February 2010; revised 26 March 2010; accepted 30 March 2010; published 4 May 2010. [1] Over the last three years, the Cassini spacecraft has been by electron beams associated with the aurora. Initially auroral in a series of high inclination orbits, allowing investigation hiss was believed to be produced by incoherent Cherenkov and measurements of Saturnian auroral phenomena. During radiation [Jørgensen, 1968]. However, this theory later this time, the Radio and Plasma Wave Science (RPWS) proved insufficient to explain the observed intensities, which Investigation on Cassini detected low frequency whistler were far too large for this mechanism [Taylor and Shawhan, mode emissions propagating upward along the auroral field 1974]. Around the same time, sounding rocket experiments lines, much like terrestrial auroral hiss. Comparisons of observed whistler mode plasma waves in conjunction with an RPWS data with Cassini Plasma Spectrometer (CAPS) artificially injected electron beam [Cartwright and Kellogg, plasma measurements during a high‐latitude pass on 17 1974; Monson et al., 1976]. Maggs [1976] first suggested October 2008, show that intense upward moving electron that auroral hiss was generated by a coherent beam‐plasma beams with energies of a few hundred eV were associated interaction at the Landau resonance velocity.
    [Show full text]
  • L Dependence of Energetic Electron Precipitation Driven by Magnetospherically Reflecting Whistler Waves J
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 107, NO. A8, 1150, 10.1029/2001JA000303, 2002 L dependence of energetic electron precipitation driven by magnetospherically reflecting whistler waves J. Bortnik, U. S. Inan, and T. F. Bell Space, Telecommunications, and Radioscience Laboratory, Electrical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA Received 19 September 2001; revised 16 November 2001; accepted 30 November 2001; published 1 August 2002. [1] Ray tracing analysis and a first-order treatment of the wave frequency and electron energy dependence of gyroresonant pitch angle scattering reveals the L shell dependence of the time-integrated energetic electron (>150 keV) precipitation flux in the drift loss cone due to a single cloud-to-ground lightning stroke. Primary features of the L dependence are determined by the ray paths of magnetospherically reflecting nonducted whistler waves, as well as the refraction of the wave normal vectors due to ionospheric horizontal electron density gradients at low latitudes. Calculations for lightning source latitudes of 25°,35°, and 45°, with an assumed ‘‘average’’ ionospheric electron density profile, as well as an International Reference Ionosphere model profile, indicate that horizontal ionospheric electron density gradients can cause the whistler wave energy to focus near the geomagnetic equator on the first magnetospheric traverse, resulting in a spatially narrow precipitation signature at low L shells (1.4 < L < 1.65). The magnitude of this low-L peak is found to be sensitively dependent on the local ionospheric density gradients. Subsequent magnetospheric reflections result in a broad precipitation peak at higher L shells (1.8 < L < 4.2), which is robustly present, with magnitude being relatively insensitive to lightning source-latitude and ionospheric horizontal gradients.
    [Show full text]
  • A Whistler Radio
    Jon Wallace 111Birden St, Torrington, CT 06790; [email protected] Amateur Radio Astronomy Projects—A Whistler Radio The author takes us for a ride into the amazing world of natural radio signals! [In the author’s Jan/Feb 2010 QEX version of that schematic diagram is repro- and disperse) detect the electromagnetic article, there was an error in Figure 5, the duced here. — Ed.] radiation at about 10 Hz to 20 kHz from schematic diagram of the Gyrator II VLF I wanted to continue my project arti- lightning, aurora, solar flares and other receiver. When our Graphics Department cles with my favorite, a “whistler” radio.1 effects on the Earth as they react with created the schematic, a 0.001 µF capacitor, “Whistler” radios (named for the whistle- the atmosphere. These signals are easily C4, was omitted between sections U1A and like sound heard when radio signals from detected and create a variety of sounds, U1B of the op amp. When I reviewed the lightning travel along magnetic field lines which I will discuss in this article. This gives schematic for accuracy, I failed to notice that the “whistler” radio data a distinctive sound missing capacitor, and I apologize for the quality that no other radio astronomy project error. Several readers wrote to point out the 1Jon Wallace, “Amateur Radio Astronomy has, and makes them much more enjoyable omission, and we thank them. A corrected Projects,” QEX, Jan/Feb 2010, pp 3-8. to use and share with others. Figure 5 from Jan/Feb 2010 QEX, p 5 — This corrected schematic diagram shows the Gyrator II VLF receiver.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Lightning in Saturn's Northern Hemisphere
    Detection of lightning in Saturn's Northern Hemisphere Mohsen H. Moghimi Department of Aerospace Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran; [email protected] Abstract During Cassini flyby of Saturn at a radial distance 6.18푅푠 (Saturn Radius), a signal was detected from about 200 to 430 Hz that had the proper dispersion characteristics to be a whistler. The frequency-time dispersion of the whistler was found to be 81 Hz1/2s. Based on this dispersion constant, we determined, from a travel time computation, that the whistler must have originated from lightning in the northern hemisphere of Saturn. Using a simple centrifugal potential model consisting of water group ions, and hydrogen ions we also determine the fractional concentration and scale height that gave the best fit to the observed dispersion. Keywords: Data Analysis, Lightning, Magnetic Fields, Spectrographs 1 Introduction Whistlers are electromagnetic waves which have frequencies below the electron cyclotron frequency and electron plasma frequency. Lightning also produce this wave and make it possible to propagate along the magnetic field lines from the source of lightning to the detector. In 1935 Eckersley carried out a detailed study 퐷 of whistler and show that the time delay varied as , where 퐷 is dispersion constant and f is frequency. This 푓 relation is called the Eckersley law. He could not explain the long delay time, which was sometimes several seconds or more. In 1953 Storey was the first to confirm that whistlers were produced by lightning. He observed a lightning flash, and heard the whistling tone a few seconds later. Storey was also the first to propose the correct theoretical explanation of whistlers.
    [Show full text]
  • Generation of Whistler Waves by Continuous HF Heating 10.1002/2015RS005892 of the Upper Ionosphere Special Section: 1 2 2,3 1 4 2 Ionospheric Effects A
    Radio Science RESEARCH ARTICLE Generation of whistler waves by continuous HF heating 10.1002/2015RS005892 of the upper ionosphere Special Section: 1 2 2,3 1 4 2 Ionospheric Effects A. Vartanyan , G. M. Milikh , B. Eliasson , A. C. Najmi , M. Parrot , and K. Papadopoulos Symposium 2015 1Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland, USA, 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA, 3Department of Physics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK, Key Points: 4Laboratoire de Physique et Chimie de l’Environnement et de l’Espace, CNRS, Orleans, France • First clear observations of LH-whistler conversion by ionospheric HF heating • Both linear and nonlinear mechanisms for LH-whistler Abstract Broadband VLF waves in the frequency range 7–10 kkHz and 15–19 kHz, generated by conversion are observed F region CW HF ionospheric heating in the absence of electrojet currents, were detected by the DEMETER • LH-whistler mode conversion satellite overflying the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) transmitter during simulations confirm the experimental observations HAARP/BRIOCHE campaigns. The VLF waves are in a frequency range corresponding to the F region lower lybrid (LH) frequency and its harmonic. This paper aims to show that the VLF observations are whistler Correspondence to: waves generated by mode conversion of LH waves that were parametrically excited by HF-pump-plasma A. Vartanyan, interaction at the upper hybrid layer. The paper discusses the basic physics and presents a model that [email protected] conjectures (1) the VLF waves observed at the LH frequency are due to the interaction of the LH waves with meter-scale field-aligned striations—generating whistler waves near the LH frequency; and (2) Citation: the VLF waves at twice the LH frequency are due to the interaction of two counterpropagating LH Vartanyan, A., G.
    [Show full text]
  • Whistler Waves Produced by Monochromatic Currents in the Low Nighttime Ionosphere Vera G
    https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2020-51 Preprint. Discussion started: 26 August 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Whistler waves produced by monochromatic currents in the low nighttime ionosphere Vera G. Mizonova1,2 and Peter A. Bespalov3 1Nyzhny Novgorod State Technical University, Nyzhny Novgorod, Russia 2National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russia 3Institute of Applied Physics RAS, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia Correspondence: Peter A. Bespalov ([email protected]) Abstract. We use a full-wave approach to find the field of monochromatic whistler waves which are excited and propagating in the low nighttime ionosphere. The source current is located in the horizontal plane and can have arbitrary distribution over horizontal coordinates. The ground-based horizontal magnetic field and electric field at 125 km are calculated. The character of wave polarization on the ground surface is investigated. The percentages of source energy supplied to the Earth-ionosphere 5 waveguide and carried upward ionosphere are estimated. Received results are important for the analysis of ELF/VLF emission phenomena observed both on the satellites and on the ground. 1 Introduction ELF/VLF waves, which propagate in the ionosphere in whistler mode, are an important part of the ionosphere dynamics. Such waves can be emitted by various natural phenomena such as atmospheric lightning discharges and volcanic eruptions, 10 magnetospheric chorus and hiss. Artificial ELF/VLF waves have been produced by ground based transmitters and by modulated HF heating of the ionosphere current system responsible for Sq variations or auroral electrojet, which is by a now well known technique. Several numerical methods have been developed for calculating of whistler wave fields in the Earth’s ionosphere (Pitteway, 1965; Wait, 1970; Bossy, 1979; Nygre’n, 1982; Budden, 1985; Nagano et al., 1994 , Yagitani et al., 1994; Shalashov and 15 Gospodchikov, 2011).
    [Show full text]