DOCSLIB.ORG

Supercell Radar Signatures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Supercell Radar Signatures OBJECTIVES 1. The student will understand how to use WxScope to access current and archived radar data. 2. The student will understand the reflectivity values frequently associated with hail and heavy rain. 3. The student will understand reflectivity patterns associated with hook echoes and tornadic circulations. 4. The student will understand the fundamentals of supercell storm motion. 5. Given a series of Doppler images from a supercell, the student will be able to identify the hook echo, presence of hail, heavy rain, and tornadic circulation. 6. The student will be able to predict storm locations relative to current radar images. 7. The student will be able to compare predictions to actual storm locations to determine if the storm moved as expected, moved right or left of predicted path. PREREQUISITES MATERIALS Basic understanding of WeatherScope. Computer Completion of Understanding Weather Radar WxScope software lecture in the OCS EarthStorm series Archived radar data VOCABULARY Hook echo: A pendant-shaped echo usually toward the right rear of the echo on a radar screen that indicates the presence of a mesocyclone and possible presence of a tornado. Radar: An electronic instrument used to detect objects (such as precipitation) by their ability to reflect and scatter microwaves back to a receiver. Reflectivity: A measure of the fraction of radiation reflected by a given surface; defined as a ratio of the radiant energy reflected to the total that is incident upon a surface. Generally “reflectivity” is used in place of the phrase “radar reflectivity factor” or “equivalent radar reflectivity factor.” Supercell: A large, long-lived (up to several hours) cell consisting of one quasi-steady updraft- downdraft couplet that is generally capable or producing the most sever weather (tornadoes, high winds, and giant hail). Tornado vortex signature (TVS): The radar “signature” of a vortex indicative of a tornado or tornadic circulation. A small-scale anomalous region of high shear associated with a tornado. Doppler radar: A radar that determines the velocity of falling precipitation either toward or away from the radar unit by taking into account the Doppler shift. Doppler shift: The change in the frequency of waves that occurs when the emitter or the observers is moving toward or away from the other. I. Accessing radar data using WxScope WeatherScope (or WxScope) software makes accessing and viewing weather data simple. Throughout the lab, you will be accessing archived radar data via WeatherScope. The reader should download the WeatherScope software from this website http://climate.ok.gov . While WxScope does not yet have complete radar data archives, you will be accessing specific times that are available. More specifically, you will be studying the reflectivity and velocity signatures associated with the May 3, 1999 tornadoes and thunderstorms as well as tracking the storms. Application 1.1 1. Using WxScope, select the region of interest by choosing Product, New, Shape. From the pull down menu, select a state and click OK. (More than one state may be displayed. Recall from the WxScope tutorial that ↑ Zooms in and ↓ Zooms out) 2. To display radar in the desired regions, choose Product, New, Radar. From the pull down menu, choose the radar site. (use the default Base Reflectivity I radar product) By default the radar data shown will be current. 3. To display archived radar data, double-click on the date display in the legend. 4. Choose the desired date and the duration of data desired. 5. To view a time series of data in specific intervals, choose the interval steps desired. 6. From the Window pull-down menu, select Show Animator. To animate the images, select the Play button. To view the images individually, select the advance button to the right of the play button. Example: To display radar images from the May 3, 1999 from 4:00 pm to 8:00 pm in 15 minute intervals, select Date: 05/03/1999 4:00:00PM Duration: 4 Hours After Date Interval: Step By 15 Minutes II. Vertical Structure of a Supercell Figure 1: Supercell Structure (Church et al., The Tornado, 1993) The schematic in Figure 1 is a vertical cross section of a supercell thunderstorm. As moist air rises in the front of the storm, an updraft forms. When air in the updraft cannot rise anymore it acts similar to water coming from a hose and hitting a wall; it spreads out both toward the front and rear of the storm. Strong winds aloft may cause the updraft to tilt towards the rear of the storm. In the above schematic, a rainy forward-flank downdraft is oriented toward the front of the storm while the rear-flank downdraft is towards the rear. Upper-level winds behind the supercell feeding air into the storm compose the rear inflow jet and reinforce the rear-flank downdraft. With a supercell, the updraft and downdraft are separate and structured in such a way to sustain the supercell for hours. The rainy forward-flank downdraft is associated with heavy rain. This corresponds to the broad region of reflectivity values toward the front of the supercell as seen on radar (discussed more in the following section). In strong updrafts, if an ice nucleus forms, precipitation will freeze around the nucleus and hail can form. Hail generally occurs in the same region as heavy precipitation, near the updraft of the storm. Suspended hail particles fall when their weight can no longer be supported by the updraft. Enhanced areas of reflectivity within regions of reflectivity associated with rain indicate the possibility of hail. III. Reflectivity Structures of a Supercell Supercells often can be identified by viewing Doppler radar images. A classic supercell has several distinctive characteristics on radar including the hook echo, areas of enhanced reflectivity, and a bounded weak echo region. A low-level hook is often present on the right rear side of the storm. The hook is formed by the interaction of the downdrafts with the updraft. In this region, the winds are cyclonic (counter- clockwise) and draw the precipitation into a cyclonic spiral. The hook surrounds a clear “notch” in the echo is caused by precipitation-free, warm, moist air flowing into the storm- the updraft. This is notch is referred to as a weak echo region. Recall from lecture that the dark purple and red regions of the image represent the strongest reflectivities associated with strong rainfall and/or hail. Enhanced Reflectivity Figure 2: Hook Echo and Bounded Weak Echo From http://www.crh.noaa.gov/lmk/soo/docu/supercell.htm Application 3.1 1. Access radar data for May 3, 1999 at 7:00 pm using WxScope. a. Use NEXRAD Level III data; base reflectivity I; OK-Oklahoma City radar. 2. What distinct radar signatures do you note? 3. Of the three main cells, focus on the southeastern cell. Identify the region where likelihood for tornado development is the greatest (hook echo) 4. Identify the bounded weak echo region. 5. In the same cell, where is the heaviest precipitation occurring? 6. Given the reflectivity values, where is hail most likely to occur? IV. Doppler Radar: Target Velocities Recall from lecture that Doppler radar can also sense target velocities, or the speed at which a target is moving horizontally toward or away from the radar. Mesocyclones and tornadic circulations have distinct velocity patterns that produce distinct radar signatures. Cyclonic rotation (counter-clockwise) (below left) is represented by Doppler radar velocity image (below right): Figure 3: Left: Rotational winds within a vortex. Right: Doppler velocity pattern. From http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/(Gl)/wwhlpr/tvs.rxml?hret=/indexlist.rxml In tornado velocity signatures, adjacent regions will have sharply different velocities, typically with one inbound (green- toward the radar) and one outbound (red- away from the radar). In the radar velocity image below, note the highlighted region. The winds blowing toward the radar (green) are in close proximity to those blowing away from the radar (red). A pair questions to motivate scientific inquiry are: (a) What type of circulation is associated with this signature, cyclonic (counter-clockwise) or anticyclonic (clockwise)? and (b) What atmospheric phenomena is associated with this type of signature? Figure 4: Example of Doppler velocity pattern from a WSR-88D. From http://www.crh.noaa.gov/grb/indexphp.php?page=events/082398 The area of variable velocities above is considered a Tornado Vortex Signature (TVS). A TVS indicates cyclonic motion (counter-clockwise) and is associated with favorable conditions for tornado development. The presence of a low-level TVS suggests that a tornado may be occurring or may soon develop. Application: Activity 4.1 The following images show the reflectivity and velocity, respectively, for a storm in Texas in 1995. Figure 5: Reflectivity (left) and velocity (right) imagery. From http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/(Gh)/guides/rs/rad/appl/trndo.rxml 1. Locate the hook echo in the reflectivity image. 2. What do you notice about the velocity patterns in the second image with respect to the hook echo location? 3. What atmospheric phenomena might occur near Newcastle? Activity 4.2 1. Using WxScope, from the Product pull-down menu, select New ! Radar… 2. Select NEXRAD Level III data for the site OK-Oklahoma City radar. Select Product: Base Velocity I and Opacity 100%. 3. Click on the date in the upper-left corner. View the velocity data for May 3, 1999 at 7:00pm, as in the Supercell application. At first it may be difficult to see a Tornado vortex signature. In order to better identify the TVS, overlay the radar for May 3: 4. From the Product menu select New ! Radar. Select NEXRAD Level III radar at the OK-Oklahoma City site using the Product Base Reflectivity I.
Recommended publications
  • 23 Public Reaction to Impact Based Warnings During an Extreme Hail Event in Abilene, Texas

    23 Public Reaction to Impact Based Warnings During an Extreme Hail Event in Abilene, Texas

    23 PUBLIC REACTION TO IMPACT BASED WARNINGS DURING AN EXTREME HAIL EVENT IN ABILENE, TEXAS Mike Johnson, Joel Dunn, Hector Guerrero and Dr. Steve Lyons NOAA, National Weather Service, San Angelo, TX Dr. Laura Myers University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL Dr. Vankita Brown NOAA/National Weather Service Headquarters, Silver Spring, MD 1. INTRODUCTION 3. HOW THE PUBLIC REACTED TO THE WARNINGS A powerful, supercell thunderstorm with hail up to the Of the 324 respondents, 86% were impacted by the size of softballs (>10 cm in diameter) and damaging extreme hail event. Listed below are highlighted winds impacted Abilene, Texas, during the Children's responses to some survey questions. Art and Literacy Festival and parade on June 12, 2014. It caused several minor injuries. This storm produced 3.1 Survey question # 3 widespread damage to vehicles, homes, and businesses, costing an estimated $400 million. More People rely on various sources of information when than 200 city vehicles sustained significant damage and making a decision to prepare for hazardous weather Abilene Fire Station #4 was rendered uninhabitable. events. Please indicate the sources that influenced your Giant hail of this magnitude is a rare phenomenon decisions on how to prepare BEFORE this severe (Blair, et al., 2011), but is responsible for a thunderstorm event occurred. disproportionate amount of damage. 1) Local television In support of a larger National Weather Service 2) Websites/social media (NWS) effort, the San Angelo Texas Weather Forecast 3) Wireless alerts/cell phones
  • From Improving Tornado Warnings: from Observation to Forecast

    From Improving Tornado Warnings: from Observation to Forecast

    Improving Tornado Warnings: from Observation to Forecast John T. Snow Regents’ Professor of Meteorology Dean Emeritus, College of Atmospheric and Geographic Sciences, The University of Oklahoma Major contributions from: Dr. Russel Schneider –NOAA Storm Prediction Center Dr. David Stensrud – NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory Dr. Ming Xue –Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, University of Oklahoma Dr. Lou Wicker –NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory Hazards Caucus Alliance Briefing Tornadoes: Understanding how they develop and providing early warning 10:30 am – 11:30 am, Wednesday, 21 July 2010 Senate Capitol Visitors Center 212 Each Year: ~1,500 tornadoes touch down in the United States, causing over 80 deaths, 100s of injuries, and an estimated $1.1 billion in damages Statistics from NOAA Storm Prediction Center Supercell –A long‐lived rotating thunderstorm the primary type of thunderstorm producing strong and violent tornadoes Present Warning System: Warn on Detection • A Warning is the culmination of information developed and distributed over the preceding days sequence of day‐by‐day forecasts identifies an area of high threat •On the day, storm spotters deployed; radars monitor formation, growth of thunderstorms • Appearance of distinct cloud or radar echo features tornado has formed or is about to do so Warning is generated, distributed Present Warning System: Warn on Detection Radar at 2100 CST Radar at 2130 CST with Warning Thunderstorms are monitored using radar A warning is issued based on the detected and
  • Chapter-5 Doppler Effect

    Chapter-5 Doppler Effect

    Chapter-5 Doppler Effect Stationary source Stationary observer Moving source Stationary observer Stationary source Moving observer Moving source Moving observer http://www.astro.ubc.ca/~scharein/a311/Sim/doppler/Doppler.html Doppler Effect The Doppler effect is the apparent change in the frequency of a wave motion when there is relative motion between the source of the waves and the observer. The apparent change in frequency f experienced as a result of the Doppler effect is known as the Doppler shift. The value of the Doppler shift increases as the relative velocity v between the source and the observer increases. The Doppler effect applies to all forms of waves. Doppler Effect (Moving Source) http://www.absorblearning.com/advancedphysics/demo/units/040103.html Suppose the source moves at a steady velocity vs towards a stationary observer. The source emits sound wave with frequency f. From the diagram, we can see that the distance between crests is shortened such that ' vs Since = c/f and = 1/f, We get c c v s f ' f f c vs f ' ( ) f c vs Doppler Effect (Moving Observer) Consider an observer moving with velocity vo toward a stationary source S. The source emits a sound wave with frequency f and wavelength = c/f. The velocity of the sound wave relative to the observer is c + vo. c Doppler Shift Consider a source moving towards an observer, the Doppler shift f is c f f ' f ( ) f f c vs f v s f c v s f v If v <<c, then we get s s f c The above equation also applies to a receding source, with vs taking as negative.
  • A Study of Synoptic-Scale Tornado Regimes

    A Study of Synoptic-Scale Tornado Regimes

    Garner, J. M., 2013: A study of synoptic-scale tornado regimes. Electronic J. Severe Storms Meteor., 8 (3), 1–25. A Study of Synoptic-Scale Tornado Regimes JONATHAN M. GARNER NOAA/NWS/Storm Prediction Center, Norman, OK (Submitted 21 November 2012; in final form 06 August 2013) ABSTRACT The significant tornado parameter (STP) has been used by severe-thunderstorm forecasters since 2003 to identify environments favoring development of strong to violent tornadoes. The STP and its individual components of mixed-layer (ML) CAPE, 0–6-km bulk wind difference (BWD), 0–1-km storm-relative helicity (SRH), and ML lifted condensation level (LCL) have been calculated here using archived surface objective analysis data, and then examined during the period 2003−2010 over the central and eastern United States. These components then were compared and contrasted in order to distinguish between environmental characteristics analyzed for three different synoptic-cyclone regimes that produced significantly tornadic supercells: cold fronts, warm fronts, and drylines. Results show that MLCAPE contributes strongly to the dryline significant-tornado environment, while it was less pronounced in cold- frontal significant-tornado regimes. The 0–6-km BWD was found to contribute equally to all three significant tornado regimes, while 0–1-km SRH more strongly contributed to the cold-frontal significant- tornado environment than for the warm-frontal and dryline regimes. –––––––––––––––––––––––– 1. Background and motivation As detailed in Hobbs et al. (1996), synoptic- scale cyclones that foster tornado development Parameter-based and pattern-recognition evolve with time as they emerge over the central forecast techniques have been essential and eastern contiguous United States (hereafter, components of anticipating tornadoes in the CONUS).
  • Evaluating Operational and Newly Developed Mesocyclone and Tornado Detection Algorithms for Quasi-Linear Convective Systems Thomas James Turnage

    Evaluating Operational and Newly Developed Mesocyclone and Tornado Detection Algorithms for Quasi-Linear Convective Systems Thomas James Turnage

    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2007 Evaluating Operational and Newly Developed Mesocyclone and Tornado Detection Algorithms for Quasi-Linear Convective Systems Thomas James Turnage Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES EVALUATING OPERATIONAL AND NEWLY DEVELOPED MESOCYCLONE AND TORNADO DETECTION ALGORITHMS FOR QUASI-LINEAR CONVECTIVE SYSTEMS By THOMAS JAMES TURNAGE A thesis submitted to the Department of Meteorology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Degree Awarded: Summer Semester, 2007 The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Thomas J. Turnage defended on April 5th, 2007. ____________________________________ Henry E. Fuelberg Professor Directing Thesis ____________________________________ Jon E. Ahlquist Committee Member ____________________________________ Paul H. Ruscher Committee Member ____________________________________ Andrew I. Watson Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I first want to thank the Lord. Without His blessings, none of this would have been possible. Next, I want to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to my major professor Dr. Henry Fuelberg for working with me to complete this thesis in spite of rotating shift work at the National Weather Service (NWS) in Tallahassee and a subsequent move to Michigan. His high standards of integrity and academic excellence have been an inspiration to me. I also wish to thank the members of my thesis committee, Mr. Irv Watson of the NWS in Tallahassee, and Drs. Jon Ahlquist and Paul Ruscher for their advice and support.
  • The Montague Doppler Radar, an Overview June 2018

    The Montague Doppler Radar, an Overview June 2018

    ISSUE PAPER SERIES The Montague Doppler Radar, An Overview June 2018 NEW YORK STATE TUG HILL COMMISSION DULLES STATE OFFICE BUILDING · 317 WASHINGTON STREET · WATERTOWN, NY 13601 · (315) 785-2380 · WWW.TUGHILL.ORG The Tug Hill Commission Technical and Issue Paper Series are designed to help local officials and citizens in the Tug Hill region and other rural parts of New York State. The Tech- nical Paper Series provides guidance on procedures based on questions frequently received by the Commis- sion. The Issue Paper Series pro- vides background on key issues facing the region without taking advocacy positions. Other papers in each se- ries are available from the Tug Hill Commission. Please call us or vis- it our website for more information. The Montague Doppler Weather Radar, An Overview Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Who owns the Montague radar? ................................................................................................................. 1 Who uses the Montague radar? .................................................................................................................. 1 How does the radar system work? .............................................................................................................. 2 How does the radar predict lake-effect snowstorms? ................................................................................ 2 How does the
  • Glossary Compiled with Use of Collier, C

    Glossary Compiled with Use of Collier, C

    Glossary Compiled with use of Collier, C. (Ed.): Applications of Weather Radar Systems, 2nd Ed., John Wiley, Chichester 1996 Rinehard, R.E.: Radar of Meteorologists, 3rd Ed. Rinehart Publishing, Grand Forks, ND 1997 DoC/NOAA: Fed. Met. Handbook No. 11, Doppler Radar Meteorological Observations, Part A-D, DoC, Washington D.C. 1990-1992 ACU Antenna Control Unit. AID converter ADC. Analog-to-digitl;tl converter. The electronic device which converts the radar receiver analog (voltage) signal into a number (or count or quanta). ADAS ARPS Data Analysis System, where ARPS is Advanced Regional Prediction System. Aliasing The process by which frequencies too high to be analyzed with the given sampling interval appear at a frequency less than the Nyquist frequency. Analog Class of devices in which the output varies continuously as a function of the input. Analysis field Best estimate of the state of the atmosphere at a given time, used as the initial conditions for integrating an NWP model forward in time. Anomalous propagation AP. Anaprop, nonstandard atmospheric temperature or moisture gradients will cause all or part of the radar beam to propagate along a nonnormal path. If the beam is refracted downward (superrefraction) sufficiently, it will illuminate the ground and return signals to the radar from distances further than is normally associated with ground targets. 282 Glossary Antenna A transducer between electromagnetic waves radiated through space and electromagnetic waves contained by a transmission line. Antenna gain The measure of effectiveness of a directional antenna as compared to an isotropic radiator, maximum value is called antenna gain by convention.
  • Downloaded 09/30/21 06:43 PM UTC JUNE 1996 MONTEVERDI and JOHNSON 247

    Downloaded 09/30/21 06:43 PM UTC JUNE 1996 MONTEVERDI and JOHNSON 247

    246 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 11 A Supercell Thunderstorm with Hook Echo in the San Joaquin Valley, California JOHN P. MONTEVERDI Department of Geosciences, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California STEVE JOHNSON Association of Central California Weather Observers, Fresno, California (Manuscript received 30 January 1995, in ®nal form 9 February 1996) ABSTRACT This study documents a damaging supercell thunderstorm that occurred in California's San Joaquin Valley on 5 March 1994. The storm formed in a ``cold sector'' environment similar to that documented for several other recent Sacramento Valley severe thunderstorm events. Analyses of hourly subsynoptic surface and radar data suggested that two thunderstorms with divergent paths developed from an initial echo that had formed just east of the San Francisco Bay region. The southern storm became severe as it ingested warmer, moister boundary layer air in the south-central San Joaquin Valley. A well-developed hook echo with a 63-dBZ core was observed by a privately owned 5-cm radar as the storm passed through the Fresno area. Buoyancy parameters and ho- dograph characteristics were obtained both for estimated conditions for Fresno [on the basis of a modi®ed morning Oakland (OAK) sounding] and for the actual storm environment (on the basis of a radiosonde launched from Lemoore Naval Air Station at about the time of the storm's passage through the Fresno area). Both the estimated and actual hodographs essentially were straight and suggested storm splitting. Although the actual CAPE was similar to that which was estimated, the observed magnitude of the low-level shear was considerably greater than the estimate.
  • Meteorology – Lecture 19

    Meteorology – Lecture 19

    Meteorology – Lecture 19 Robert Fovell [email protected] 1 Important notes • These slides show some figures and videos prepared by Robert G. Fovell (RGF) for his “Meteorology” course, published by The Great Courses (TGC). Unless otherwise identified, they were created by RGF. • In some cases, the figures employed in the course video are different from what I present here, but these were the figures I provided to TGC at the time the course was taped. • These figures are intended to supplement the videos, in order to facilitate understanding of the concepts discussed in the course. These slide shows cannot, and are not intended to, replace the course itself and are not expected to be understandable in isolation. • Accordingly, these presentations do not represent a summary of each lecture, and neither do they contain each lecture’s full content. 2 Animations linked in the PowerPoint version of these slides may also be found here: http://people.atmos.ucla.edu/fovell/meteo/ 3 Mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) and drylines 4 This map shows a dryline that formed in Texas during April 2000. The dryline is indicated by unfilled half-circles in orange, pointing at the more moist air. We see little T contrast but very large TD change. Dew points drop from 68F to 29F -- huge decrease in humidity 5 Animation 6 Supercell thunderstorms 7 The secret ingredient for supercells is large amounts of vertical wind shear. CAPE is necessary but sufficient shear is essential. It is shear that makes the difference between an ordinary multicellular thunderstorm and the rotating supercell. The shear implies rotation.
  • ESSENTIALS of METEOROLOGY (7Th Ed.) GLOSSARY

    ESSENTIALS of METEOROLOGY (7Th Ed.) GLOSSARY

    ESSENTIALS OF METEOROLOGY (7th ed.) GLOSSARY Chapter 1 Aerosols Tiny suspended solid particles (dust, smoke, etc.) or liquid droplets that enter the atmosphere from either natural or human (anthropogenic) sources, such as the burning of fossil fuels. Sulfur-containing fossil fuels, such as coal, produce sulfate aerosols. Air density The ratio of the mass of a substance to the volume occupied by it. Air density is usually expressed as g/cm3 or kg/m3. Also See Density. Air pressure The pressure exerted by the mass of air above a given point, usually expressed in millibars (mb), inches of (atmospheric mercury (Hg) or in hectopascals (hPa). pressure) Atmosphere The envelope of gases that surround a planet and are held to it by the planet's gravitational attraction. The earth's atmosphere is mainly nitrogen and oxygen. Carbon dioxide (CO2) A colorless, odorless gas whose concentration is about 0.039 percent (390 ppm) in a volume of air near sea level. It is a selective absorber of infrared radiation and, consequently, it is important in the earth's atmospheric greenhouse effect. Solid CO2 is called dry ice. Climate The accumulation of daily and seasonal weather events over a long period of time. Front The transition zone between two distinct air masses. Hurricane A tropical cyclone having winds in excess of 64 knots (74 mi/hr). Ionosphere An electrified region of the upper atmosphere where fairly large concentrations of ions and free electrons exist. Lapse rate The rate at which an atmospheric variable (usually temperature) decreases with height. (See Environmental lapse rate.) Mesosphere The atmospheric layer between the stratosphere and the thermosphere.
  • An Implementation of Real-Time Phased Array Radar Fundamental Functions on a DSP-Focused, High-Performance, Embedded Computing Platform

    An Implementation of Real-Time Phased Array Radar Fundamental Functions on a DSP-Focused, High-Performance, Embedded Computing Platform

    aerospace Article An Implementation of Real-Time Phased Array Radar Fundamental Functions on a DSP-Focused, High-Performance, Embedded Computing Platform Xining Yu 1,*, Yan Zhang 1, Ankit Patel 1, Allen Zahrai 2 and Mark Weber 2 1 School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, 3190 Monitor Avenue, Norman, OK 73019, USA; [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (A.P.) 2 National Severe Storms Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atomospheric Administration, Norman, OK 73072, USA; [email protected] (A.Z.); [email protected] (M.W.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-405-325-2871 Academic Editor: Konstantinos Kontis Received: 22 July 2016; Accepted: 2 September 2016; Published: 9 September 2016 Abstract: This paper investigates the feasibility of a backend design for real-time, multiple-channel processing digital phased array system, particularly for high-performance embedded computing platforms constructed of general purpose digital signal processors. First, we obtained the lab-scale backend performance benchmark from simulating beamforming, pulse compression, and Doppler filtering based on a Micro Telecom Computing Architecture (MTCA) chassis using the Serial RapidIO protocol in backplane communication. Next, a field-scale demonstrator of a multifunctional phased array radar is emulated by using the similar configuration. Interestingly, the performance of a barebones design is compared to that of emerging tools that systematically take advantage of parallelism and multicore capabilities, including the Open Computing Language. Keywords: phased array radar; embedded computing; serial RapidIO; MPAR 1. Introduction 1.1. Real-Time, Large-Scale, Phased Array Radar Systems In [1], we had introduced the real-time phased array radar (PAR) processing based on the Micro Telecom Computing Architecture (MTCA) chassis.
  • Central Region Technical Attachment 95-08 Examination of an Apparent

    Central Region Technical Attachment 95-08 Examination of an Apparent

    CRH SSD APRIL 1995 CENTRAL REGION TECHNICAL ATTACHMENT 95-08 EXAMINATION OF AN APPARENT LANDSPOUT IN THE EASTERN BLACK HILLS OF WESTERN SOUTH DAKOTA David L. Hintz1 and Matthew J. Bunkers National Weather Service Office Rapid City, South Dakota 1. Abstract On June 29, 1994, an apparent landspout occurred in the Black Hills of South Dakota. This landspout exhibited most of the features characteristic of traditional landspouts documented in eastern Colorado. The landspout lasted 3 to 8 minutes, had a width of less than 20 m and a path of 1 to 3 km, produced estimated wind speeds of Fl intensity (33 to 50 m s1), and emanated from a towering cumulus (TCU) cloud located along a quasi-stationary convergencq/cyclonic shear zone. No radar echo was observed with this event; however, a supercell thunderstorm was located 80-100 km to the east. National Weather Service meteorologists surveyed the “very localized” damage area and ruled out the possibility of the landspout being related to microburst, gustnado, or dust devil activity, as winds away from the landspout were less than 3 m s1. The landspout apparently “detached” from the parent TCU and damaged a farm which resulted in $1,000 dollars in expenses. 2. Introduction During the late 1980’s and early 1990’s researchers documented a phe­ nomenon with subtle differences from traditional tornadoes and waterspouts, herein referred to as the landspout (Seargent 1994; Brady and Szoke 1988, 1989; Bluestein 1985). The term “landspout” was actually coined by Bluestein (I985)(in the formal literature) when he observed this type of vortex along an Oklahoma squall line.