HARMONIC MAPPINGS BETWEEN RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS by Anand Arvind Joshi a Thesis Presented to the FACULTY of the GRADUATE SCHOOL UN
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
HARMONIC MAPPINGS BETWEEN RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS by Anand Arvind Joshi A Thesis Presented to the FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS (MATHEMATICS) August 2006 Copyright 2006 Anand Arvind Joshi Dedication I dedicate this thesis to my parents Arvind and Suvarna Joshi. ii Table of Contents Dedication ii Abstract iv 1 Harmonic Mappings 1 1.1 SpaceofMaps............................... 1 1.2 ConnectionsintheSpaceofMaps . 4 1.3 TheFirstVariationFormula. 11 1.4 HarmonicMaps.............................. 16 2 The Heat Flow Method 18 2.1 TheEellsSampsonTheorem . 18 2.2 TheHeatFlowMethod .......................... 19 3 Existence of Local and Global Solutions 31 3.1 ExistenceofLocalSolutions . 31 3.2 ExistenceofGlobalTime-DependentSolutions . ..... 43 Bibliography 48 Appendices 49 A Holder¨ Spaces and Some Results on PDEs 49 A.1 H¨olderSpaces............................... 49 A.2 SomeResultsonPDEs .......................... 51 A.3 Fr´echetDerivative.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 53 iii Abstract Harmonic mappings between two Riemannian manifolds is an object of extensive study, due to their wide applications in mathematics, science and engineering. Proving the existence of such mappings is challenging because of the non-linear nature of the cor- responding partial differential equations. This thesis is an exposition of a theorem by Eells and Sampson, which states that any given map from a Riemannian manifold to a Riemannian manifold with non-positive sectional curvature can be freely homotoped to a harmonic map. In particular, this proves the existence of harmonic maps between such manifolds. The technique used for the proof is the heat-flow method. iv Chapter 1 Harmonic Mappings In this chapter we define and discuss harmonic mappings. Let (M,g) and (N, h) be m and n dimensional Riemannian manifolds, and let u denote a smooth map from M to N, i.e. u ∈ C∞(M, N). A natural question to ask is: what is the ‘least expanding’ map from M to N? In order to make precise what we mean by ‘least expanding’ map here, we need to analyze the space of maps C∞(M, N). In the sections that follow, we do this analysis and define an energy of maps on this space. A harmonic map will be a critical point of this energy as discussed later. 1.1 SpaceofMaps ∗ Let TxM denote the tangent space of M and let TxM be the dual space of this tan- ∞ gent space. We know that u ∈ C (M, N) implies that dux is a linear map from TxM to Tu(x)N, i.e. dux ∈ Hom(TxM, Tu(x)N). We want to find a metric on Hom(TxM, Tu(x)N) so that we can define energy of maps. We first prove a lemma. ∼ ∗ Lemma 1.1.1. TxM = TxM . The isomorphism is linear and induces a metric on ∗ TxM . 1 Proof. The Riemannian metric g induces a natural linear isomorphism between TxM ∗ m i ∂ and its dual TxM defined as follows. Let Xx = i=0 X (x)( ∂xi )x ∈ TxM and wx = m i ∗ ∗ i=0 wi(x)(dx )x ∈ TxM . Define ♭ : TxM → TxPM and ♯ : TxM → TxM P m m ♭ j i Xx = ( gij(x)X (x))(dx )x, (1.1) i=1 i=1 X X m m ∂ w♯ = ( gij(x)w (x))( ) . (1.2) j ∂xi x i=1 i=1 X X Clearly ♯ and ♭ are linear. Also it can be verified that they are inverse of each other ∗ ∗ resulting in a linear isomorphism between TxM and TxM . Now we define a metric gx ∗ on TxM by ∗ ♯ ♯ ∗ gx(wx, θx)= gx(wx, θx) for wx, θx ∈ TxM . (1.3) ∗ ∗ i j This bilinear form gx is a metric due to linearity of ♯. We can also get gx((dx)x, (dx)x)= ij ij gx where (g ) denotes the matrix inverse of g =(gij). ∼ ∗ Proposition 1.1.2. Hom(TxM, Tu(x)N) = TxM ⊗ Tu(x)N. † ∗ Proof. For every f ∈ Hom(TxM, Tu(x)N) we associate a bilinear map f ∈ TxM ⊗ Tu(x)N by defining † ∗ f (V,w)= w(f(V )), ∀V ∈ TxM,w ∈ Tu(x)N . (1.4) We can see that, given such a bilinear map, we can also associate with it a linear map in Hom(TxM, Tu(x)). We know that dux ∈ Hom(TxM, Tu(x)N) is represented in local coordinates by ∂ m ∂uα ∂ du = (x) . (1.5) x ∂xi ∂xi ∂yα α=1 u(x) X 2 ∗ Since the basis for TxM ⊗ Tu(x)N is given by ∂ (dxi) ⊗ ( ) , (1.6) x ∂yα u(x) dux is represented by m n ∂uα ∂ du = (x)(dxi) ⊗ . (1.7) x ∂xi x ∂yα i=1 α=1 u(x) X X ij ∗ We proved that g is an inner product on TxM . Also hu(x) is the induced inner ∗ product in Tu(x). These two inner products induce an inner product on TxM ⊗ Tu(x)N given by ∂ ∂ (dxi) ⊗ , (dxj) ⊗ = gijh (u(x)). (1.8) x ∂yα x ∂yβ αβ * u(x) u(x)+ Since this inner product is defined everywhere on M, we define an inner product on sections by setting ′ ′ ′ ∗ −1 hσ, σ i(x)= hσ(x), σ (x)ix, for x ∈ M; σ, σ ∈ Γ(T M ⊗ u T N). (1.9) With this inner product, we define a norm on dux given by m n ∂uα ∂uβ |du|2 = gijh (u) . (1.10) αβ ∂xi ∂xj i,j=1 X α,βX=1 With this norm defined on Hom(TM,TN), we now define the energy density of a map. Definition 1.1.1. Given u ∈ C∞(M, N), the energy density function of u is defined as 1 e(u)(x)= |du|2 (x), x ∈ M. (1.11) 2 3 Definition 1.1.2. Let (M,g) be a compact Riemannian manifold. Given u ∈ C∞(M, N), the energy or harmonic energy of u is defined as 1 E(u)= e(u)dµ = |dµ |. (1.12) g 2 g ZM ZM The energy density of u can be interpreted in a following way. Let {e1, ..., em}, and ′ ′ {e1, ..., en} be orthonormal bases with respect to gx and hu(x), for tangent spaces TxM and Tu(x)N, respectively. We express dux in these bases as n α ′ dux(ei)= λi eα, i =1, ..., m. (1.13) α=1 X Then, we get m n 2 α 2 |du| (x)= (λi ) . (1.14) i=1 α=1 X X Consequently, we can regard the energy density functional e(u)(x) as the ‘rate of expan- sion’ of the differential dux : TxM → Tu(x)N of u at x ∈ M. This is why we call e(ux) ‘energy density’ of the map. Thus the energy E(u) is defined for each u ∈ C∞(M, N). The energy of maps E can be regarded as a functional E : C∞(M, N) → R, and we want to find maps which are critical points of this functional E. 1.2 Connections in the Space of Maps Having introduced an inner product and norm for u ∈ Hom(M, N) i.e. on Γ(T M ∗ ⊗ u−1T N) we want to know what is the effect on energy if the map u is changed by a small amount. In other words, we want to be able to take directional derivatives in the 4 space Γ(T M ∗ ⊗u−1T N). To do that, we develop the notion of connection for this space. First, we develop connections for T M ∗ and u−1T N. Let ∇ denote the Levi-Civita connection of M which gives us a map ∇ : Γ(T M) → Γ(T M ∗ ⊗ T N) (1.15) which assigns a tensor field ∇Y ∈ Γ(T M ∗ ⊗ T M) of type (1, 1) to Y ∈ Γ(T M), a (0, 1) tensor field. ∇Y is the covariant differential of Y . Let ♯ and ♭ be the isomorphisms between T M and T M ∗ given in (1.1) and (1.2). We can define a connection ∇∗ in T M ∗ by setting ∗ ♯ ♭ ∗ ∇X w(Y )=(∇X w ) (Y ), Y ∈ Γ(T M),w ∈ Γ(T M ) (1.16) ♯ = gx(∇X w ,Y ) (1.17) ♯ ♯ = X(gx(w ,Y )) − gx(w , ∇X Y ) by compatibility of ∇ (1.18) = Xw(Y ) − w(∇X Y ) (1.19) which could also serve as an alternate definition for the connection ∇∗ and also explains that the connection ∇∗ on T M ∗ and connection ∇ on T M can be regarded as dual to each other. ∗ Because of the compatibility of ∇ with gij, we can see that the connection ∇ is compatible with the metric gij on T M ∗ by the following computation. ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ Lemma 1.2.1. Xg (w, θ)= g (∇X w, θ)+ g (w, ∇X , θ). 5 Proof. ∗ ♯ ♯ ♯ ∗ ♯ RHS = g((∇X w) , θ )+ g(w , (∇X θ) ) (1.20) ♯ ♯ ♯ ♯ = g(∇X w , θ )+ g(w , ∇X θ ) (1.21) = Xw(θ♯)= LHS (1.22) Thus ∇∗ is a Riemannian connection. Now that we have introduced the connection ∇∗ in T M ∗, what are the connection coefficients? We use (1.19) to do the computation. ∗ k ∂ ∂ k ∂ k ∂ ∂ ∂ (1.23) (∇ dx )( l )= j dx ( l ) − dx (∇( ) l ) ∂xj ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂xj ∂x ∂ = δk − Γk (1.24) ∂xj l jl k = −Γjl (1.25) Thus we get an expression for ∇∗ as m ∗ k k j ∇ ∂ dx = − Γijdx , 1 ≤ i, k ≤ m. (1.26) ∂xi j=1 X We note that the connection coefficients of ∇∗ induced in T M ∗ from ∇ are negative of the connection coefficients of ∇. Now consider the tangent bundle u−1T N ⊂ T M induced from T N by the map u : M → N. At each point x, ∂ ∂ ◦ u (x), ..., ◦ u (x) (1.27) ∂y1 ∂yn 6 −1 gives rise to a base for the fiber Tu(x)N of u T N over x.