DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROPOSED REINTRODUCTION OF A MIGRATORY FLOCK OF WHOOPING CRANES IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES June 2001 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 3 in cooperation with Regions 2, 4, 5, and 6 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROPOSED REINTRODUCTION OF A MIGRATORY FLOCK OF WHOOPING CRANES IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES June 2001 Authority: Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended Prepared by: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Region 3), in cooperation with: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Region 2) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Region 4) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Region 5) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Region 6) Abstract: This environmental assessment considers the biological, environmental, and socioeconomic effects of a proposal to establish a self-sustaining population of whooping cranes (Grus americana) separate from the two existing populations. This action has been recommended by the Whooping Crane Recovery Team to contribute to the long-term recovery of the endangered whooping crane. Alternatives considered in this environmental assessment include: (1) No Action; (2) establish a nonessential experimental migratory population of whooping cranes in the eastern United States with introduction of cranes to Wisconsin and migration to a wintering site at Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge in Florida (Preferred Alternative); (3) establish a migratory population of whooping cranes, classified as endangered, in the same locations; (4) establish a nonessential experimental migratory population of whooping cranes with initial reintroduction to Seney National Wildlife Refuge in Michigan and migration to a wintering site at Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge in Florida. Regions 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service are cooperating in this endeavor. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION .......................................1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................1 1.2 Purpose ..........................................................1 1.3 Need ...........................................................2 1.4 Decision that Must be Made ...........................................2 1.5 Issues and Concerns ................................................2 1.6 Scoping ..........................................................3 2.0 ALTERNATIVES, INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION ....................4 2.1 Alternatives Considered But Not Studied In Detail ..........................6 2.1.1 Continue Reintroduction Experiments In the Rocky Mountains ........6 2.1.2 Reintroduce Whooping Cranes to Marsh Island Wildlife Preserve, Louisiana ..................................................7 2.1.3 Reintroduce whooping cranes in Manitoba and/or Saskatchewan ......8 2.1.4 Establish an additional nonmigratory flock of whooping cranes in Florida ..........................................................9 2.2 Alternatives Studied in Detail ..........................................9 2.2.1 Implementation Techniques Common to All Action Alternatives ...........9 2.2.2 Alternative 1 - No Action ......................................11 2.2.3 Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative) - Establish a nonessential experimental migratory population of whooping cranes in the eastern United States with initial reintroduction of captive-reared cranes to Wisconsin and migration to a wintering site at Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge in Florida .................................................12 2.2.4 Alternative 3 - Establish a migratory population of whooping cranes, classified as endangered in the eastern United States with initial reintroduction of captive-reared cranes to Wisconsin and migration to a wintering site at Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge in Florida .........................................................13 2.2.5 Alternative 4 - Establish a nonessential experimental migratory population of whooping cranes in the eastern United States with initial reintroduction of captive-reared cranes to Seney National Wildlife Refuge in Michigan and migration to a wintering site at Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge in Florida ...........................................14 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .............................................14 3.1 Potential Wisconsin Release Areas .....................................15 3.1.1 Physical Characteristics .......................................16 i 3.1.2 Biological Environment ........................................17 Vegetation ................................................17 Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Species ....................19 Other Wildlife Species ........................................20 Disease ...................................................20 3.1.3 Land Use ..................................................20 Agriculture and Industrial Use ...................................21 Residential Use .............................................22 Recreational Use ............................................23 Water Usage ...............................................24 3.1.4 Cultural/Paleontological Resources ...............................25 3.1.5 Local Socio-economic Conditions ...............................25 3.2 Primary Florida Wintering Area .......................................26 3.2.1 Physical Characteristics .......................................26 3.2.2 Biological Environment ........................................27 Vegetation .................................................27 Threatened, Endangered and Candidate Species .....................27 Other Wildlife Species ........................................28 Disease ...................................................29 3.2.3 Land Use ..................................................29 Agriculture and Industrial Use ...................................29 Residential Use .............................................30 Recreational Use ............................................30 Water Usage ...............................................30 3.2.4 Cultural/Paleontological Resources ...............................30 3.2.5 Local Socio-economic Conditions ...............................31 3.3 Seney National Wildlife Refuge Release Area .............................31 3.3.1 Physical Characteristics .......................................32 3.3.2 Biological Environment ........................................32 Vegetation ................................................32 Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Species ..................33 Other Wildlife Species ........................................33 Disease ...................................................33 3.3.3 Land Use ..................................................33 Agriculture and Industrial Use ...................................34 Residential Use .............................................34 Recreational Use ............................................34 Water Usage ...............................................34 3.3.4 Cultural/Paleontological Resources ...............................34 3.3.5 Local Socio-economic Conditions ...............................34 ii 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ..................................35 4.1 Physical Characteristics .............................................35 4.2 Biological Environment ..............................................35 4.2.1 Vegetation .................................................35 4.2.2 Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Species ....................35 Alternative 1 ...............................................35 Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative) ..............................37 Alternatives 3 and 4 ........................................ 40 4.2.3 Other Wildlife Species ........................................41 Alternatives 2, 3 and 4 ........................................41 4.2.4 Disease ...................................................41 Alternatives 2, 3 and 4 ........................................41 4.3 Land Use ........................................................42 4.3.1 Agriculture and Industrial Use ...................................42 Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative) ..............................42 Alternative 3 ...............................................42 Alternative 4 ...............................................43 4.3.2 Residential Use .............................................43 Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative) ..............................43 Alternative 3 ...............................................43 Alternative 4 ...............................................44 4.3.3 Recreational use .............................................44 Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative) ..............................44 Alternative 3 ...............................................46 Alternative 4 ...............................................47 4.3.4 Water Usage ...............................................47 Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative) ..............................47 Alternative 3 ...............................................48 Alternative 4 ...............................................48 4.4 Cultural/Paleontological Resources .....................................48 Alternatives 2, 3 and 4 ........................................48 4.5 Local Socio-economic Conditions .....................................48 Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative) .............................48 Alternative 3 ...............................................50 Alternative 4 ...............................................52 4.6 Logistical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • September 2018 Issue of the Eastern
    September 2018 The Eastern Crane E-bulletin is distributed to those interested in cranes in general, and specifically, the Eastern Populations of Sandhill and Whooping Cranes, as well as the continuing work for the protection of these birds and their habitats. ............................................................................................................................................................. Photo courtesy of H. Ray, Operation Migration Editor: I know I speak for many others when I thank Operation Migration, its staff and volunteers for their dedication for the past 25 years working towards bringing Whooping Cranes back to the eastern United States. While acknowledging this was a joint effort, along with other members of the Whooping Crane Eastern Partnership, Operation Migration dramatically heightened public interest in Whooping Cranes. What better way to capture the imagination and hearts of thousands than with an ultralight wending its way southward, followed closely by a group of young birds from an endangered species, on their first 1 Eastern Crane Bulletin – September 2018 migration south? High in the sky above us all – a delicate, undulating white line of hope – a step on the path to bringing the species back. We thank you Operation Migration for a job well done and wish you all well. (The following three pieces were written by Joe Duff, Co-founder / CEO, Operation Migration, and are reproduced here with his permission.) Operation Migration resigns from WCEP & dissolves organization by Joe Duff, Co-founder / CEO, Operation Migration, August 17, 2018 Operation Migration took flight 25 years ago when two artists-turned-aviators developed a method of teaching birds a new migratory route. The innovative approach helped stabilize the dwindling population of the magnificent Whooping crane.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the North American Crane Working Group
    - Newsletter of the North American Crane Working Group - Vol. 28 No. 2 Fall/Winter 2017-18 President’s Report dues online. We also plan to eventually provide ne of the primary functions of the North indexing of Workshop Proceedings in major search O American Crane Working Group is to engines linked to download of individual articles sponsor a Workshop to provide updates on from our website. current research on cranes and status of populations and their management. Lubbock, The NACWG also addresses specific crane Texas, has been selected as the location of the conservation issues, and we are attempting to next Workshop. Workshop 15 is anticipated in expand our role in this area by offering our January 2020, with Texas Tech University hosting expertise. Current issues involve the consequences and field trips to Muleshoe National Wildlife of the discontinued whooping crane propagation Refuge and local ranches. Start planning. We program at Patuxent Wildlife Research Center and welcome your attendance. transfer of the birds to other facilities. This flock is critical to survival of the species as a source of stock Meanwhile, the major current activity of NACWG for reintroductions, and the latter require rearing by is completion of Proceedings of our most recent rigorous protocols, already difficult in captivity, to Workshop (14) held last year in Chattanooga. All ensure suitability for release into the wild. NACWG manuscripts have been received by Co-editors also has potential for productive review and Jane Austin and Richard Urbanek and most have solution of reintroduction and other crane been reviewed and returned to authors for final management problems.
    [Show full text]
  • View Entire Issue As
    Vin Diesel on ‘Furious 7’ The action star talks about how Paul Walker’s death changed the hit movie and brought a new level of seriousness to the set — and to his own life. page 36 April 9, 2015 | Vol. 6 No. 10 4 Clash over Walker’s budget Republicans face a lot of tough choices in dealing with a budget that critics call calamitous. 13 Earth Day activities Earth Day arrives on April 22, and WiG presents a short cal- endar of activities that will help you to enjoy it. 31 Jeeves’ final bow Local actor Matt Daniels reprises his role as the perfect valet for the third and last time. Lift off Wisconsin helps steer the whooping 33 Hubbard Street Dance The Chicago troupe returns to one of its favorite performance crane’s comeback page 6 locations, Madison’s Overture Center for the Arts. 2 WISCONSINGAZETTE.COM | April 9, 2015 News with a twist WiGWAG By Lisa Neff, Louis Weisberg & Matthew Reddin APPLE A daY, OR SO who had written that soci- didn’t pay gown himself. He even let He hid 1,000 artworks — Hurricane, Utah. The sculp- A study recently pub- ety would be better without too much, he Izzy wear the crown. A the- each valued at about $500 ture on Barista’s restau- lished in JAMA Internal cops. The La Crosse Tribune just drank too ater employee snapped and — around the city and rant had boasted oversized Medicine raises ques- reported the Rev. David much. shared a picture of the two led people on daily hunts.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Practice Quiz List Report Page 1 Accelerated Reader®: Friday, 12/16/11, 10:12 AM
    Reading Practice Quiz List Report Page 1 Accelerated Reader®: Friday, 12/16/11, 10:12 AM Osceola Elementary Reading Practice Quizzes Int. Book Point Fiction/ Quiz No. Title Author Level Level Value Language Nonfiction 17504 Anansi Does the Impossible! An VernaAshanti Aardema Tale LG 3.2 0.5 English Fiction 7659 Borreguita and the Coyote Verna Aardema LG 3.1 0.5 English Fiction 9758 Bringing the Rain to Kapiti Plain Verna Aardema LG 4.6 0.5 English Fiction 5550 Why Mosquitoes Buzz...Ears Verna Aardema LG 4.0 0.5 English Fiction 39800 City in the Clouds Tony Abbott MG 3.2 1.0 English Fiction 39829 The Hidden Stairs and the Magic CarpetTony Abbott MG 2.9 1.0 English Fiction 39812 Journey to the Volcano Palace Tony Abbott MG 3.1 1.0 English Fiction 101890 Kringle Tony Abbott MG 4.8 10.0 English Fiction 39831 The Mysterious Island Tony Abbott MG 3.0 1.0 English Fiction 57174 The Children We Remember Chana Byers Abells MG 2.1 0.5 English Nonfiction 51951 Ghost Cat Mark Abley LG 4.6 0.5 English Fiction 5490 Song and Dance Man Karen Ackerman LG 4.0 0.5 English Fiction 12456 Dear Peter Rabbit Alma Flor Ada LG 4.2 0.5 English Fiction 60902 I Love Saturdays Y Domingos Alma Flor Ada LG 3.2 0.5 English Fiction 18416 In the Cow's Backyard Alma Flor Ada LG 2.5 0.5 English Fiction 12380 My Name Is Maria Isabel Alma Flor Ada LG 4.9 1.0 English Fiction 54924 With Love, Little Red Hen Alma Flor Ada LG 4.8 0.5 English Fiction 119421 Jessica Simpson Michelle Medlock AdamsMG 6.9 1.0 English Nonfiction 105111 Let's Play Soccer! Heather Adamson LG 1.7 0.5 English Nonfiction 902009 Grandma's Table (HM Edition) Penina Adelman LG 1.9 0.5 English Fiction 6455 The Cat That Was Left Behind C.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 04 Apr-Biknox
    VOLUME 27 • NUMBER 3 APR 2004 through the biKNOXularsbiKNOXulars Newsletter of the Knoxville Chapter of the Tennessee Ornithological Society ‘Whooping Crane Migration in the Eastern Flyway’ is the topic of April 7 program TOS member Vickie (Taylor) Henderson know the Operation Migration pilots and crew mem- presents "Whooping Crane Migration in bers. This past fall, Henderson was in charge of K the Eastern Flyway" on Wednesday, making sure the Whooping Crane pen at April 7 at 7 p.m. Henderson actively Hiwassee Refuge was clear of trash and volunteers for Operation Migration, the was prepared for the Whoopers’ arrival. organization overseeing the reintroduc- Operation Migration has benefited tion of the Whooping Crane Migration from Henderson’s other talents as well. from Wisconsin to Florida. She created the artwork for their new Henderson’s interest was piqued hat. She has created a child’s coloring when she first learned about Operation book for the Whooping Crane Migration and the cranes passing Conservation. though "our back yard," Hiwassee Henderson has also participated Refuge (Meigs County). Since then she in the more mundane, but equally has been present at Hiwassee for all of important, tasks of handing out the ultra-light trained migrations. - (Continued on page 2) During the stopovers she has gotten to ✍ MARK YOUR CALENDAR Friday, April 2 - Sunday, April 4 Southern Illinois and St. Louis. See page 1. April field trips. Thursday, April 15, 22 and 29•8 AM Friday, April 2 - Sunday, April 4 Sharps Ridge, Knox County. See page 1. Southern Illinois and St. Louis. Saturday, April 17•7 AM Leader: David Trently: [email protected]; 974-8664 (w); Oak Ridge Reservation's North 531-1473 (h).
    [Show full text]
  • End of an Era for Ft Gaines and Operation Migration Story and Images by Mike Ramy (
    End of an Era for Ft Gaines and Operation Migration Story and Images by Mike Ramy (www.mikieproductions.com) Operation Migration has played a lead role in the reintroduction of endangered Whooping Cranes into eastern North America since 2001. In the 1940's the species was at the brink of extinction, reduced to just 13 birds world wide. Using ultralight aircraft, Operation Migration pilots act as surrogate parents and guide captive-hatched Whooping Cranes along a planned migration route beginning in Wisconsin and ending at their wintering destination in the St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge in Florida. The idea for Operation Migration began in 1993 by Bill Lishman and Joe Duff who conducted the first ever human-led migration of birds. At the time, Duff was an ultralight pilot and a successful commercial photographer. The two artists-turned-biologists imprinted 18 Canada geese and, in the fall, they used two ultralights to lead them from Purple Hill in Ontario, across Lake Ontario, to the Environment Studies Division of Airlie Center in Warrenton, Virginia. Sixteen of those birds survived the winter and thirteen returned on their own the following spring. In 1995 Lishman and Duff formed a limited company called ‘In The Sky Productions’ and contracted with Columbia Pictures to produce the 1996 film “Fly Away Home”, starring Jeff Daniels and Anna Paquin. In The Sky Productions provided the story rights, the wildlife permits, the geese, the flying and even some of the cinematography for the popular film. For the past 15 years Operation Migration has been instrumental in the reintroduction of the once extinct eastern migratory route that has helped increase the numbers of Whooping Page 1 of 3 Cranes to over 600 today.
    [Show full text]
  • January - February 2016
    APALACHEE AUDUBON SOCIETY Apalachee Audubon Society Mission Statement: Protection of the environment through education, appreciation, and conservation. NEWSLETTER OF THE APALACHEE AUDUBON SOCIETY, INC. JANUARY - FEBRUARY 2016 January Speaker Series Program ~ Thursday, January 28, 2016 “Whooping Cranes” Colleen Chase, Operation Migration Speaker Series Social from 7 – 7:30 pm with program following Free and open to the public. Social begins at 7 pm & meeting at 7:30 pm (unless otherwise noted). WHO Festival Speaker Series programs are held at the Wildlife Heritage & Outdoors Festival Unitarian Universalist Church, 2810 N. Meridian Rd., Tallahassee. Saturday, February 6, 2016 Directions and more information: St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge www.apalachee.org . 2015-2016 Program Dates Wildlife-Friendly Yards Tour 2015 2016 Apalachee Audubon Chapter Fundraiser September 24 January 28 October 22 February 25 Saturday, February 13, 2016 November 19* March 24 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM April 28 Cost: $10.00 *3rd Thursday May 26 Tickets available at Native Nurseries, 1661 Centerville Road None in December & Wild Birds Unlimited, 1505-2 Governor’s Square Boulevard th Inside This Issue 18 Annual Great Backyard Bird Count, 2016 February 12-15, 2016 President’s Message 3 Officers & Directors 2 http://www.birdsource.org/gbbc Whooping Cranes History 5 Operation Migration 6 WHO Festival 9 February Speaker Series Program ~ Thursday, February 25, 2016 Wildlife-Friendly Yards Tour 11 NOTE -- Change of Location to FSU, King Life Science Bldg. Auditorium Great Backyard Bird Count 12 319 Stadium Drive ~ Free Parking Pollinator Conservation 13 Parking Lot & Garage on Stadium Drive just south of King Building In the Yard 14 “Native Pollinators – Ecology and Identification” Landscape for Life 15 Book Reviews for You 19 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Crane Bulletin, March 2018 Issue, Pp.9-10
    March 2018 The Eastern Crane E-bulletin is distributed to those interested in cranes in general, and specifically, the Eastern Populations of Sandhill and Whooping Cranes, as well as the continuing work for the protection of these birds and their habitats. ............................................................................................................................................................. Eastern Migratory Population of WHOOPERS Tackling Whooping Crane chick mortality Excerpt from the International Crane Foundation, 2017 Annual Report “Reintroduced Whooping Cranes are now nesting in Wisconsin. They are successfully laying eggs and hatching chicks. Unfortunately, we are losing far too many of these chicks to predators. Our biologists are concerned that Whooping Cranes raised by humans may be less adept at protecting their chicks from predators than Whooping Cranes raised by actual cranes. this past year marked the first year we could rear the entire cohort of chicks with their Whooping Crane parents, rather than with surrogate parents (humans) in costumes. Interactions with human handlers were greatly minimized during the captive period prior to release. Our aviculturists helped assess appropriate release locations, conducted the releases, and then monitored the released chicks. They were then tracked with their adult migration guides to learn more about this reintroduction technique. The information we collect from these releases will help us learn more about how chicks fare in the wild, and whether their rearing method is a factor in their survival.” Conservation and cranes From the International Crane Foundation / Notes from the President, December 2017 Conservation is likewise about finding balance in challenging circumstances – that elusive balance that results in win-win solutions for people and wildlife and thereby builds broad public support for conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Whooping Crane Eastern Partnership
    HOOPING WW HOOPING CC RANE EE ASTERN ARTNERSHIP PP 2005 ANNUAL REPORT U.S.G.S. NATIONAL WILDLIFE HEALTH CENTER FOUNDING MEMBERS U.S.G.S. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center International Whooping Crane Recovery Team Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Wisconsin Natural Resources Foundation U.S.G.S. National Wildlife Health Center United States Fish & Wildlife Service National Fish & Wildlife Foundation International Crane Foundation Operation Migration USA & Operation Migration Canada Inc. T ABL E OF C ONT ENT S CHAPTER PAGE PROJECT OVERVIEW……………………………………….……. 1 2005 PROJECT YEAR IN SUMMARY……………….…………..…. 2 - 4 John Christian, Kelley Tucker, Project Direction Team Co-Chairs RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT…………..…… 5 - 6 Bob Lange, Charlie Luthin, Co-Chairs CHICK REARING AND EARLY CONDITIONING REPORT…….……. 7 - 10 Dr. Glenn H. Olsen EARLY CONDITIONING AND ULTRALIGHT TRAINING REPORT..…. 11 - 21 Joseph Duff, Chair HEALTH TEAM REPORT…………………….……………….…… 22 - 25 Dr. Barry Hartup, Chair TRACKING AND DIRECT AUTUMN RELEASE REPORT 26 - 46 Dr. Richard Urbanek, Sara Zimorski, Co-Chairs Dr. Richard Urbanek, Marianne Wellington, Co-Chairs (DAR) COMMUNICATIONS AND OUTREACH TEAM REPORT………..…… 47 - 55 Charles Underwood, Rachel Levin, Co-Chairs MANAGEMENT PLAN & MONITORING DATA BASE FOR 56 - 57 WHOOPING CRANES IN WISCONSIN….…………………….……. Beth Goodman, Chair CHAIRS AND AUTHORS’ AFFILIATIONS….……………..…….…. 58 PROJECT OVERVIIEW T he fundamental purpose for the formation of the Whooping Crane Eastern Partnership (WCEP) was to plan and guide the reintroduction of a self-sustaining population of migratory Whooping cranes (Grus americana) in eastern North America. The project also focuses strongly on efforts to promote environmental education. WCEP partners promote the development of public awareness and support for the protection and restoration of Whooping crane habitat to decision-makers and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • It Was a Time to Celebrate
    2 Wood Buffalo/Aransas Flock of Peace Point and Garden River. Another smaller fire was burning along the Klewi River in the territory of one of the nesting pairs. The lack of rain in June had mixed blessings: Water levels throughout the whooping crane breeding The Good is that recently hatched young are not exposed to grounds in the northeastern corner of Wood Buffalo cool wet weather and survival in the first few weeks is high, National Park and adjacent areas were very poor during the however; The Bad is that the wetlands dry out and the area fall of 2006. At weather stations on either side of the nesting becomes more accessible to predators, resulting in reduced area, below-normal snowfall levels were reported long term survival of the young. Habitat conditions were so throughout the winter, so things were not looking good for bad (see photo) in the Sass River nesting area that most of the 2007 breeding season. When we began our nest surveys the wetlands were dry resulting in only 4 of 16 nesting pairs in May, we discovered higher than expected water levels, producing young in that area. and near normal habitat conditions, however once the frost left the ground water levels began to drop rapidly. We We would like to thank Tom Stehn and Jim Bredy for carried out whooping crane breeding pair surveys between survey assistance in June and our pilots Ivan Bourke, Brent May 16 and 23, chick hatching success surveys June 13-18 Macdonald and J. Pauls from Northwestern Air Lease for with the assistance of the United States Fish and Wildlife May and August surveys.
    [Show full text]