A Crewed Mars Exploration Architecture Using Flyby and Return Trajectories

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Crewed Mars Exploration Architecture Using Flyby and Return Trajectories FISO Telecon 04-08-15 A CREWED MARS EXPLORATION ARCHITECTURE USING FLYBY AND RETURN TRAJECTORIES Andrew S.W. ThomAs NASA Astronaut, Exploraon Branch, Astronaut Office, NASA Johnson Space Center CesAr A. OCAmpo Senior Engineer, Odyssey Space Research LLC., NASA Johnson Space Center DAmon F. LAndAu Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Ins1tute of Technology These are part of the results of an internal NASA-JSC study with NASA-JPL collaboration titled The Mars Lite Study Presentation given by: C. Ocampo and D. Landau This presentation is not a stand-alone presentation document. It requires narration. © 2015 All rights reserved 1 Inspiraon Mars Foundaon Aims to launch a manned mission to fly By Mars in By 2021 Foundaon claims that space explora+on provides a catalyst for growth, na+onal prosperity, knowledge and global leadership. By taking advantage of this window of opportunity, the Inspiraon Mars Foundaon intends to revitalize interest in science, technology, engineering and mathema+cs (STEM) educa+on. hPp://www.inspiraonmars.org/ 2 Figure Only: EME-Inspiration Mars Foundation. (in case next slide video does not work for some) 3 Video: EME-Inspiration Mars Foundation. Click center of screen once to start. 4 Figure Only: EME-Inspiration Mars Foundation Fly Around. (in case next slide video does not work for some) 5 Video: EME-Inspiration Mars Foundation Fly Around. Click center of screen once to start. 6 Single FlyBy Mission: fast in-and-out Ballistic single flyby Pass. dip in and out Δv Speed up Δv Catch up Δv 7 Figure Only: Single Flyby Mission: fAst in-And-out: (in CAse neXt slide video does not work for some) 8 Video: Single Flyby Mission: fAst in-And-out: CliCk Center of sCreen onCe to stArt. 9 Soluon: Use Low Energy FlyBy and Return Trajectories with Two FlyBy Events Inherit natural abort opon The two flyby events separated By months Place massive transit habitat(s) on these trajectories eliminAte inseron and depArture of massive assets into and out of Mars OrBit 1st flyby event is used to drop off a crew taxi 2nd flyby event picks-up and uses a hyperboliC rendezvous for Earth return Assume Mars Stay Habitat has been Pre-deployed at Mars Favor launch, en-route maneuvers, Earth arrival speeds over transit >mes. Assume no new major technology development. 10 Work summarized and presented as paper AAS 15-372 at the 25th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Mee1ng, WilliamsBurg, VA, January 2015 11 Mars Free Returns… Damon Landau 12 Broad Search of Mars Free-Returns Search parameters Launch 2015–2052 Maximum flight 1me: 1200 days Maximum Launch V∞: 7 km/s Maximum Arrival V∞: 9 km/s Minimum Mars flyBy al1tude: 300 km Heliocentric revolu1ons Between encounters: 0 or 1 NumBer of gravity assists: 1 or 2 Parameters specific to “Star” algorithm Time step for encounter dates: 3 days Maximum ΔV at flyBy: 20 m/s V∞ step for 180° transfers: 20 m/s 13 Trajectory Search Methodology Launch Mars Flyby Earth 1. Grid up Earth, Mars, and Earth Dates ΔV < 20 m/s Return encounter 1mes V∞ < 7 km/s Alt > 300 km V∞ < 9 km/s 2. Calculate outbound & inBound legs 2015 independently 3. Filter on low ΔV to match in & out V∞ at Mars 3-day Turns a 3-D search into two 2-D searches increments • 720M sequences considered with only 7.3M trajectory computaons (LamBert fits) • 44,725 trajectories met all constraints 2052 Flight time < 1200 d V∞ constraint violated Time node deleted 14 DouBle-FlyBy Free-Returns • EMME, EMVE, EVME Launch Mars or Mars or Earth Dates Venus Venus Return sequences in single run V∞ < 7 km/s ΔV < 20 m/s ΔV < 20 m/s V∞ < 9 km/s • Transform 4-D search 2015 into three 2-D searches • 280B sequences 3-day assessed with only increments 27M trajectory fits • 1,425 trajectories met all constraints 2052 Flight time < 1200 d 15 Building Mul1ple FlyBys Flyby ΔV calculaon Builds trajectory segments with three encounters: departure Body to flyBy Body (incoming leg) and flyBy Body to arrival Body (outgoing leg). The outgoing legs for one trajectory segment match with the incoming legs to another trajectory segment. Launch Mars or Mars or Dates Venus Venus Launch Mars or Mars or Earth Dates Venus Venus Return = Earth + Return 16 Flight Times Trajectories in black also satisfy Trans-Mars Injection ΔV < 4.5 km/s and Earth entry < 12.5 km/s 17 Launch Opportuni1es Trajectories in black also satisfy Trans-Mars Injection ΔV < 4.5 km/s and Earth entry < 12.5 km/s 18 3:2 Resonance Free Returns 19 2:1 Resonance Free Returns 20 Short Flight Time 21 DouBle Mars FlyBy 22 Venus Flybys 23 …connue Using Free Returns for extended Human Mars Exploraon missions 24 Determine how to use 2 flyBy events ? 25 Solu1on 1: Dual Habitat Concept Sketch credited to Ryan Whitley (JSC) OTH = Outbound Transit Habitat RTH = Return Transit Habitat 26 Solu1on 2: Loiter Habitat Concept Sketch credited to Ryan Whitley (JSC) 27 Used… Copernicus: A GenerAlized Trajectory Design and Opmizaon System Developed jointly Between the University of Texas and the NASA Johnson Space Center (2001-present) Hosted at NASA-JSC Current Development at JSC Current Lead Developer: JacoB Williams, ERC-NASA- JSC, Houston, Texas http://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/copernicus/ 28 Impulsive Gravity Assist to Real FlyBy Conversion 29 Impulsive Gravity Assist to Real FlyBy Conversion 30 Figure Only: Initial Guess for An Earth-Venus-Mars-Earth Free Return. Animation on next slide. Earth Depart Mars Flyby Venus Flyby Earth Arrive 31 Video: EVME Trajectory Construction Iteration Sequence. Click center of screen once to start. 32 Dual Habitat Model Uses an Earth-Mars conjunc1on class trajectory for the Outbound Habitat and an Earth-Mars-Earth FlyBy and Return Trajectory for the Return Habitat Crew Taxi 1-Sol OrBit Drop-off and Departure and Transfer to a HyperBolic 1-Sol OrBit Rendezvous with Return Habitat Low energy conjunc1on class 3:2 Resonant Earth-Mars-Earth Free Return Trajectory Earth-Mars (Habitat orBits Sun twice while the Earth orBits Sun 3 1mes 33 33 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 Earth Mars Earth Dep. Fly by Arr. RTH Crew at Mars OTH Earth Mars Dep. Fly by RTH Mars Flyby 10/21/2041 RTH E-M-E TrajeCtory (3:2 Resonant w/Earth) OTH Earth Departure OTH 10/13/2039 Mars Arrival 06/21/2040 RTH Earth Departure 06/04/2039 RTH Earth Arrival 05/13/2042 34 Figure Only: Dual Habitat Model RTH Mars Flyby Pickup, Hyperbolic Animation on next slide Rendezvous OTH Mars Arrive OTH Earth Depart RTH Earth Arrive RTH Earth Depart 35 Video: Dual Habitat Model Animation. Click center of screen once to start. 36 DuAl HAbitAt Model 37 Loiter Habitat Model Uses an Earth-Mars-Mars-Earth FlyBy and Return Trajectory Mars FlyBy 1 to Mars FlyBy 2 “Loiter Leg” Crew Taxi 1-Sol OrBit Drop-off and Departure and Transfer to a HyperBolic 1-Sol OrBit Rendezvous with Loiter Habitat 38 In live discussion point out the key features/pros/cons 39 39 Video: Loiter Hab Mars Centered Iteration Sequence. Click center of screen once to start. 40 Figure only: Converged Solution of previous slide video. 41 Figure: Mars Arrival FlyBy-Loiter-Mars Departure FlyBy 42 Figure only: Loiter Hab Mode;. (in case next slide video does not work for some) 43 Video: Loiter Hab Model Animation. Click center of screen once to start. 44 Figure Only: Loiter Hab Model Fly Around. (in case next slide video does not work for some) 45 Video: Loiter Hab Model Fly Around. Click center of screen once to start. 46 Loiter Habitat Model 47 Departure Earth Mars Mars Total Earth Mars Mars Earth Total Mars Mars Earth Mission Departure Fly-by1 Fly-by2 Arrival En-route Transit Transit Transit Duration V∞ V∞ V∞ V∞ ∆V date day day day day km/s km/s km/s km/s km/s 6 Aug 2020 399 325 303 1028 3.794 2.550 3.018 4.714 1.676 8 Sep 2022 380 311 320 1010 3.673 2.573 2.887 3.787 0.621 05 Oct 2024 348 305 325 976 3.335 2.555 2.721 3.018 0.000 27 Nov 2026 280 303 358 941 4.000 2.942 2.989 3.546 0.126 29 Dec 2028 252 305 366 923 4.000 3.746 3.505 4.609 0.205 13 Feb 2031 223 321 379 924 4.000 3.804 3.251 4.317 0.515 31 Mar 2033 218 358 346 922 4.000 3.703 3.108 4.410 1.100 22 Jul 2035 364 346 213 923 4.000 3.100 3.737 3.884 0.856 10 Sep 2037 370 317 234 921 4.000 3.178 3.669 4.118 0.195 3 Oct 2039 367 305 267 939 3.530 2.852 3.041 4.045 0.000 21 Oct 2041 341 302 338 981 3.159 2.635 2.647 3.268 0.000 15 Oct 2043 331 303 381 1016 4.000 2.782 2.666 3.630 0.495 22 Jan 2046 244 315 375 934 4.000 3.762 3.289 4.227 0.477 13 Mar 2048 219 343 360 923 4.000 3.877 3.214 4.453 0.775 7 Jul 2050 347 361 209 917 4.000 3.046 3.606 3.721 1.068 Drop-Off from And Rendezvous with TrAnsi_ng (Loiter) HAbitAt 48 Drop-Off from And Rendezvous with TrAnsi_ng (Loiter) HAbitAt 49 1st maneuver: capture, coast to apoapsis 50 2nd maneuver: plane change, coast to periapsis 51 3rd maneuver: capture into op1mal 1-Sol OrBit Mars Stay 52 4th, 5th maneuver: depart and do HyperBolic Rendezvous TotAl “In-And-Out” DV Cost = 2.308 km/s (OCt 2039) (this ranges from 2.1 to 3.1 for all 15 Loiter HabitAt Soluons) 53 Figure Only: Mars centered transfers, iteration sequence.
Recommended publications
  • Human Mars Architecture
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Human Mars Architecture Tara Polsgrove NASA Human Mars Study Team 15th International Planetary Probe Workshop June 11, 2018 Space Policy Directive-1 “Lead an innovative and sustainable program of exploration with commercial and international partners to enable human expansion across the solar system and to bring back to Earth new knowledge and opportunities. Beginning with missions beyond low-Earth orbit, the United States will lead the return of humans to the Moon for long-term exploration and utilization, followed by human missions to Mars and other destinations.” 2 EXPLORATION CAMPAIGN Gateway Initial ConfigurationLunar Orbital Platform-Gateway (Notional) Orion 4 5 A Brief History of Human Exploration Beyond LEO America at DPT / NEXT NASA Case the Threshold Constellation National Studies Program Lunar Review of Commission First Lunar Architecture U.S. Human on Space Outpost Team Spaceflight Plans Committee Pathways to Exploration Columbia Challenger 1980 1990 2000 2010 Bush 41 Bush 43 7kObama HAT/EMC MSC Speech Speech Speech Report of the 90-Day Study on Human Exploration of the Moon and Mars NASA’s Journey to National Aeronautics and November 1989 Global Leadership Space Administration Mars Exploration and 90-Day Study Mars Design Mars Design Roadmap America’s Reference Mars Design Reference Future in Reference Mission 1.0 Exploration Architecture Space Mission 3.0 System 5.0 Exploration Architecture Blueprint Study 6 Exploring the Mars Mission Design Tradespace • A myriad of choices define
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Exploration: an Overview of Indian and International Mars Missions Nayamavalsa Scariah1, Dr
    Taurian Innovative Journal/Volume 1/ Issue 1 Mars exploration: An overview of Indian and International Mars Missions NayamaValsa Scariah1, Dr. Mili Ghosh2, Dr.A.P.Krishna3 Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi Abstract- Mars is the fourth planet from the sun. It is 1. Introduction also known as red planet because of its iron oxide content. There are lots of missions have been launched to Mars is also known as red planet, because of the mars for better understanding of our neighboring planet. reddish iron oxide prevalent on its surface gives it a There are lots of unmanned spacecraft including reddish appearance. It is the fourth planet from sun. orbiters, landers and rovers have been launched into mars since early 1960. Sputnik was the first satellite The term sol is used to define duration of solar day on launched in 1957 by Soviet Union. After seven failure Mars. A mean Martian solar day or sol is 24 hours 39 missions to Mars, Mariner 4 was the first satellite which minutes and 34.244 seconds. Many space missions to reached the Martian orbiter successfully. The Viking 1 Mars have been planned and launched for Mars was the first lander reached on Mars on 1975. India exploration (Table:1) but most of them failed without successfully launched a spacecraft, Mangalyan (Mars completing the task specially in early attempts th Orbiter Mission) on 5 November, 2013, with five whereas some NASA missions were very payloads to Mars. India was the first nation to successful(such as the twin Mars Exploration Rovers, successfully reach Mars on its first attempt.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars, the Nearest Habitable World – a Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration
    Mars, the Nearest Habitable World – A Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration Report by the NASA Mars Architecture Strategy Working Group (MASWG) November 2020 Front Cover: Artist Concepts Top (Artist concepts, left to right): Early Mars1; Molecules in Space2; Astronaut and Rover on Mars1; Exo-Planet System1. Bottom: Pillinger Point, Endeavour Crater, as imaged by the Opportunity rover1. Credits: 1NASA; 2Discovery Magazine Citation: Mars Architecture Strategy Working Group (MASWG), Jakosky, B. M., et al. (2020). Mars, the Nearest Habitable World—A Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration. MASWG Members • Bruce Jakosky, University of Colorado (chair) • Richard Zurek, Mars Program Office, JPL (co-chair) • Shane Byrne, University of Arizona • Wendy Calvin, University of Nevada, Reno • Shannon Curry, University of California, Berkeley • Bethany Ehlmann, California Institute of Technology • Jennifer Eigenbrode, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center • Tori Hoehler, NASA/Ames Research Center • Briony Horgan, Purdue University • Scott Hubbard, Stanford University • Tom McCollom, University of Colorado • John Mustard, Brown University • Nathaniel Putzig, Planetary Science Institute • Michelle Rucker, NASA/JSC • Michael Wolff, Space Science Institute • Robin Wordsworth, Harvard University Ex Officio • Michael Meyer, NASA Headquarters ii Mars, the Nearest Habitable World October 2020 MASWG Table of Contents Mars, the Nearest Habitable World – A Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Venus Missions
    Appendix 1: Venus Missions Sputnik 7 (USSR) Launch 02/04/1961 First attempted Venus atmosphere craft; upper stage failed to leave Earth orbit Venera 1 (USSR) Launch 02/12/1961 First attempted flyby; contact lost en route Mariner 1 (US) Launch 07/22/1961 Attempted flyby; launch failure Sputnik 19 (USSR) Launch 08/25/1962 Attempted flyby, stranded in Earth orbit Mariner 2 (US) Launch 08/27/1962 First successful Venus flyby Sputnik 20 (USSR) Launch 09/01/1962 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Sputnik 21 (USSR) Launch 09/12/1962 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Cosmos 21 (USSR) Launch 11/11/1963 Possible Venera engineering test flight or attempted flyby Venera 1964A (USSR) Launch 02/19/1964 Attempted flyby, launch failure Venera 1964B (USSR) Launch 03/01/1964 Attempted flyby, launch failure Cosmos 27 (USSR) Launch 03/27/1964 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Zond 1 (USSR) Launch 04/02/1964 Venus flyby, contact lost May 14; flyby July 14 Venera 2 (USSR) Launch 11/12/1965 Venus flyby, contact lost en route Venera 3 (USSR) Launch 11/16/1965 Venus lander, contact lost en route, first Venus impact March 1, 1966 Cosmos 96 (USSR) Launch 11/23/1965 Possible attempted landing, craft fragmented in Earth orbit Venera 1965A (USSR) Launch 11/23/1965 Flyby attempt (launch failure) Venera 4 (USSR) Launch 06/12/1967 Successful atmospheric probe, arrived at Venus 10/18/1967 Mariner 5 (US) Launch 06/14/1967 Successful flyby 10/19/1967 Cosmos 167 (USSR) Launch 06/17/1967 Attempted atmospheric probe, stranded in Earth orbit Venera 5 (USSR) Launch 01/05/1969 Returned atmospheric data for 53 min on 05/16/1969 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Alactic Observer
    alactic Observer G John J. McCarthy Observatory Volume 14, No. 2 February 2021 International Space Station transit of the Moon Composite image: Marc Polansky February Astronomy Calendar and Space Exploration Almanac Bel'kovich (Long 90° E) Hercules (L) and Atlas (R) Posidonius Taurus-Littrow Six-Day-Old Moon mosaic Apollo 17 captured with an antique telescope built by John Benjamin Dancer. Dancer is credited with being the first to photograph the Moon in Tranquility Base England in February 1852 Apollo 11 Apollo 11 and 17 landing sites are visible in the images, as well as Mare Nectaris, one of the older impact basins on Mare Nectaris the Moon Altai Scarp Photos: Bill Cloutier 1 John J. McCarthy Observatory In This Issue Page Out the Window on Your Left ........................................................................3 Valentine Dome ..............................................................................................4 Rocket Trivia ..................................................................................................5 Mars Time (Landing of Perseverance) ...........................................................7 Destination: Jezero Crater ...............................................................................9 Revisiting an Exoplanet Discovery ...............................................................11 Moon Rock in the White House....................................................................13 Solar Beaming Project ..................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars
    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars Between 1962 and late 1973, NASA’s Jet carry a host of scientific instruments. Some of the Propulsion Laboratory designed and built 10 space- instruments, such as cameras, would need to be point- craft named Mariner to explore the inner solar system ed at the target body it was studying. Other instru- -- visiting the planets Venus, Mars and Mercury for ments were non-directional and studied phenomena the first time, and returning to Venus and Mars for such as magnetic fields and charged particles. JPL additional close observations. The final mission in the engineers proposed to make the Mariners “three-axis- series, Mariner 10, flew past Venus before going on to stabilized,” meaning that unlike other space probes encounter Mercury, after which it returned to Mercury they would not spin. for a total of three flybys. The next-to-last, Mariner Each of the Mariner projects was designed to have 9, became the first ever to orbit another planet when two spacecraft launched on separate rockets, in case it rached Mars for about a year of mapping and mea- of difficulties with the nearly untried launch vehicles. surement. Mariner 1, Mariner 3, and Mariner 8 were in fact lost The Mariners were all relatively small robotic during launch, but their backups were successful. No explorers, each launched on an Atlas rocket with Mariners were lost in later flight to their destination either an Agena or Centaur upper-stage booster, and planets or before completing their scientific missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Comet Inveslgalve Observing Campaign (CIOC) C/Siding Spring
    HST, Li et al. 2014 Comet Invesgave Observing Campaign (CIOC) C/Siding Spring Mars Flyby Results CIOC Team established Jan 2013 at SBAG-8. Team has a mix of experiences, skillsets, and research speciales. Abundant contribuons from early- and mid-SBAG sciensts. Reported monthly to Lindley Johnson, Kelly Fast, & Jim Green. Members chosen from SBAG, MEPAG*: Lisse, Baams, DiSan, Farnham, Fernandez, Kelley, Knight, Lemmon, Li, Seelos, Vervack, Warner, Yanamandra-Fisher. Mantra: Facilitate, facilitate, facilitate. Boom line is to maximize the science returned from Comet Siding Spring by involving every telescope available (mainly Southern on Earth, high sensivty remote, + Mars Fleet) for observaons. CIOC Contact Info: hp://www.cometcampaign.org Jan 7, 2015 CIOC C/Siding Spring Campaign • Observing Opportunies from Ground Limited: Southern Twilight Comet, Brightest from Earth in mid- to late-September => Good opportunies to characterize the comet pre-Mars, pre-perihelion. • Observing focused mainly on (1) Early s/c based hazard related characterizaon; (2) Inside 2 AU Earth-based chacterizaon; and (3) Mars encounter observaons Oct 17 – 21. • Mars Fleet: MRO, Mars Odyssey, MEX, MSL, Opportunity, MOM, MAVEN. 2013’s Comet ISON flyby at 0.07 AU was pracce for Comet C/2013 A1 (Siding Spring)’s VERY close Mars approach on 10/19/14 • Helio Fleet: STEREO, SOHO (?) -- A Message From Our Sponsors -- • Astrophysics Spacecra : SWIFT, WISE, HST, Spitzer, Chandra, Kepler • Websites: CIOC (FAQS, news, lightcurves, schedules/logs) hp://www.cometcampaign.org Mars Program (“ “, mission news) hp://mars.nasa.gov/comets/sidingspring/ • PRO-AM COLLABORATIONS: Facebook, Twier, and Pinterest groups; COBSA & other “professional amateurs”; Jet Morphology campaign; Ion tail campaign • NASA HQ EPO: Ask an Astronomer; FAQS; Media Point of Contact.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Insight Launch Press Kit
    Introduction National Aeronautics and Space Administration Mars InSight Launch Press Kit MAY 2018 www.nasa.gov 1 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction 4 Media Services 8 Quick Facts: Launch Facts 12 Quick Facts: Mars at a Glance 16 Mission: Overview 18 Mission: Spacecraft 30 Mission: Science 40 Mission: Landing Site 53 Program & Project Management 55 Appendix: Mars Cube One Tech Demo 56 Appendix: Gallery 60 Appendix: Science Objectives, Quantified 62 Appendix: Historical Mars Missions 63 Appendix: NASA’s Discovery Program 65 3 Introduction Mars InSight Launch Press Kit Introduction NASA’s next mission to Mars -- InSight -- will launch from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California as early as May 5, 2018. It is expected to land on the Red Planet on Nov. 26, 2018. InSight is a mission to Mars, but it is more than a Mars mission. It will help scientists understand the formation and early evolution of all rocky planets, including Earth. A technology demonstration called Mars Cube One (MarCO) will share the launch with InSight and fly separately to Mars. Six Ways InSight Is Different NASA has a long and successful track record at Mars. Since 1965, it has flown by, orbited, landed and roved across the surface of the Red Planet. None of that has been easy. Only about 40 percent of the missions ever sent to Mars by any space agency have been successful. The planet’s thin atmosphere makes landing a challenge; its extreme temperature swings make it difficult to operate on the surface. But if a spacecraft survives the trip, there’s a bounty of science to be collected.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Orbit Transfers for Dawn's Vesta Operations: Navigation and Mission
    Orbit Transfers for Dawn’s Vesta Operations: Navigation and Mission Design Experience Dongsuk Han Senior Engineering Staff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Mail Stop 264-820, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109, Phone: (818) 354-0445, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Dawn, a mission belonging to NASA’s Discovery Program, was launched on September 27, 2007 to explore main belt asteroids in order to yield insights into important questions about the formation and evolution of the solar system. From July of 2011 to August of 2012, the Dawn spacecraft successfully returned valuable science data, collected during the four planned mapping orbits at its first target asteroid, Vesta. Each mapping orbit was designed to enable a different set of scientific observations. Such a mission would have been impossible without the low thrust ion propulsion system (IPS). Maneuvering a spacecraft using only the IPS for the transfers between the mapping orbits posed many technical challenges to Dawn’s flight team at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Each transfer needs a robust plan that accounts for uncertainties in maneuver execution, orbit determination, and physical characteristics of Vesta. This paper discusses the mission design and navigational experience during Dawn’s Vesta operations. Topics include requirements and constraints from Dawn’s science and spacecraft teams, orbit determination and maneuver design and building process for transfers, developing timelines for thrust sequence build cycles, and the process of scheduling very demanding coverage with ground antennae at NASA’s Deep Space Network. Keywords: Dawn, Vesta, Navigation, Ion Propulsion system, Low Thrust, Small Body 1.
    [Show full text]
  • International Student Design Competition for Inspiration Mars Mission Report Summary (Team Kanau)
    International Student Design Competition for Inspiration Mars Mission Report Summary (Team Kanau) Shota Iino1, Kshitij Mall2, Ayako Ono3, Jeff Stuart2, Ashwati Das2, Eriko Moriyama4, Takuya Ohgi5, Nick Gillin6, Koki Tanaka1, Yuri Aida1, Max Fagin2, Daichi Nakajima7 Professor Hiroyuki Miyajima8, Assistant Professor Michael Grant2 1Keio University (Japan), 2Purdue University (USA), 3Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine (Alumnus, Japan), 4International Space University (Alumnus, France), 5Nagoya University (Alumnus, Japan), 6Art Center College of Design (USA), 7Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (Japan), 8Tokyo Jogakkan College (Japan). TEAM KANAU Table of Contents Abstract 1 1. Mission Objectives 1 2. Mission Design 1 2.1 Mission Design Methods 1 2.2 Requirements Generation 2 2.3 Concept Generation 8 2.4 Concept Selection 9 3. Concept of Operations 9 4. Trajectory Design and Launch Vehicle Selection 11 4.1 Overview 11 4.2 Interplanetary Ballistic Free-Return Trajectory 11 4.3 Earth Launch to LEO 13 5. Aerocapture 16 5.1 Sample Analysis 16 5.2 Results 17 6. Key Subsystem Architecture 18 6.1 Environment Control and Life Support System 18 6.2 Kanau Spacecraft’s Interior Design 24 6.3 Facilities for Crew Physical Health 26 6.4 Facilities for Radiation Protection 27 6.5 Command and Data Handling 27 6.6 Communications 29 6.7 Power Systems 31 6.8 Thermal Control System 36 6.9 Payload Mission 37 7. Safety Analysis and Design 38 7.1 Safety Requirements 38 7.2 Abort Options 39 7.3 Risk Acceptability 39 7.4 Risk Assessment 41 8. Crew Selection from US Astronauts 41 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Mer Landing.Qxd
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Mars Exploration Rover Landings Press Kit January 2004 Media Contacts Donald Savage Policy/Program Management 202/358-1547 Headquarters [email protected] Washington, D.C. Guy Webster Mars Exploration Rover Mission 818/354-5011 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, [email protected] Pasadena, Calif. David Brand Science Payload 607/255-3651 Cornell University, [email protected] Ithaca, N.Y. Contents General Release …………………………………………………………..................................…… 3 Media Services Information ……………………………………….........................................…..... 5 Quick Facts ………………………………………………………................................……………… 6 Mars at a Glance ……………………………………………………….................................………. 7 Historical Mars Missions ………………………………………………….....................................… 8 Mars: The Water Trail ………………………………………………………………….................…… 9 Where We've Been and Where We're Going …………………………………................ 14 Science Investigations .............................................................................................................. 17 Landing Sites ............................................................................................................................. 23 Mission Overview ……………...………………………………………..............................………. 28 Spacecraft ................................................................................................................................. 38 Program/Project Management …………………………………………….................................…
    [Show full text]
  • India to Pull Ahead of China with Mangalyaan's Success
    India is set to join the elite list of members after the US, Russia and Europe to have successfully launched termed successful only after the spacecraft manages to insert itself into the Mars orbit on September 21, INDIA TO PULL a spacecraft to Mars. The attempts made by Japan and China (using a Russian rocket) have failed so far. 2014. China had successfully sent two spacecraft, Chang’e 1 and Chang’e 2, into the lunar orbit and is India is banking on its most-successful PSLV rocket, which had put its first spacecraft, Chandrayaan-1, preparing to send a landing and rover mission, Chang’e 3, to the moon in December 2013. Here is a look AHEAD OF into the lunar orbit in 2008. The same rocket flew Mangalyaan on Tuesday. However, the mission will be at all the missions to Mars: LAUNCH DATE Mar 2 LAUNCH DATE Aug. 4 LAUNCH DATE June 10 COUNTRYEurope COUNTRY US CHINA WITH COUNTRYUS LAUNCH DATE May 30 MISSION GOAL Mars SPACECRAFT SPACECRAFT Rosetta SPACECRAFT Phoenix COUNTRY US orbit LAUNCH DATE Mars Exploration Rover A (Spirit) MISSION GOAL Comet MISSION GOAL Mars MANGALYAAN'S SPACECRAFT COMMENTS Aug 5 MISSION GOAL Rover landing COMMENTS Success landing COMMENTS Mariner-9 (Mariner I) Success COUNTRY Success COMMENTS Success LAUNCH DATE LAUNCH DATE Jul 18 LAUNCH DATE USSR LAUNCH DATE LAUNCH DATE LAUNCH DATE SUCCESS LAUNCH DATE Aug. 12 LAUNCH DATE Feb 25 SPACECRAFT Aug 20 Sep 9 Nov 7 LAUNCH DATE LAUNCH DATE July 7 COUNTRY USSR Dec 4 LAUNCH DATE June 2 COUNTRY US Nov.
    [Show full text]