Visual Culture in the Context of Turkey: Perceptions of Visual
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
VISUAL CULTURE IN THE CONTEXT OF TURKEY: PERCEPTIONS OF VISUAL CULTURE IN TURKISH PRE-SERVICE ART TEACHER PREPARATION Nur Balkir, B.A, M.F.A. Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2009 APPROVED: Jacqueline Chanda, Major Professor and the Associate Dean for the College of Art at the University of Arizona Jack Davis, Co-Major Professor and NTIEVA Director Christina Bain, Committee Member Kelly Donahue-Wallace, Chair of the Department of Art Education/Art History Robert Milnes, Dean of the School of Visual Arts Michael Monticino, Interim Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Balkir, Nur, Visual Culture in the Context of Turkey: Perceptions of Visual Culture in Turkish Pre-Service Art Teacher Preparation. Doctor of Philosophy (Art Education), May 2009, 207 pages, 1 table, references, 168 titles. This study explored the state of art education in Turkey as revealed by pre-service art education university instructors, and the potential of incorporating visual culture studies in pre- service art education in Turkey. The instructors’ ideas about visual culture, and popular culture, the impact it might have, the content (objects), and the practices within the context of Turkey were examined. Visual culture was examined from an art education perspective that focuses on a pedagogical approach that emphasizes the perception and critique of popular culture and everyday cultural experiences, and the analysis of media including television programs, computer games, Internet sites, and advertisements. A phenomenological human science approach was employed in order to develop a description of the perception of visual culture in pre-service art education in Turkey as lived by the participants. In-person interviews were used to collect the data from a purposive sample of 8 faculty members who offered undergraduate and graduate art education pedagogy, art history, and studio courses within four-year public universities. This empirical approach sought to obtain comprehensive descriptions of an experience through semi-structural interviews. These interviews employed open-ended questions to gather information about the following: their educational and professional background; their definitions of art education and art teacher education and what it means for them to teach pre-service art education; critical reflections on the educational system of Turkey; perceptions of visual and popular culture; and finally individual approaches to teaching art education. This study was conducted for the purpose of benefiting pre-service art teacher education in general and specifically in Turkey. It provided the rationale, the nature, and pedagogy of visual culture as well as the why and how of visual culture art education in the context of Turkey. Furthermore, it provided insights into the potential contribution of the concept of visual culture to the understanding of art and improvement of art teacher training in the context of Turkey. Copyright 2009 by Nur Balkir ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to thank the members of the committee for their support and guidance. Thank you to my committee chair, Dr. Jacqueline Chanda for helping me focus on the problem to be examined and for guiding me through this phenomenological study. She was always encouraging, while also helping me to conceptualize the findings. The journey would not have been as pleasant without her as the guide. Thank you to my co-chair Dr. Jack Davis who helped me to improve the quality of the research by asking tough questions which made me rethink the important points in the research. Thank you to Dr. Christina Bain for her great insights, her support and encouragement throughout my studies and through the research. Thank you to my husband, Ali Kuru, who had to share the sacrifices with me, who supported and encouraged me all those years in the program, and who was always there when I felt discouraged, reminding me that I could do this. He was right. Thank you to my brother, Sedat Balkir, for his support and for reminding me of the importance of what I was doing. To my daughter, Selen Balkir Kuru, thank you for helping me keep in focus what is really important in life. I am especially grateful to my friend, Dr. Ruth Aspy, who patiently proof-read my dissertation, and provided me the strength and stamina to endure the journey. She always took the time to listen, and laugh as well as counsel and comfort. Many thanks you to my friend, my colleague, Lori Santos, who shared treats, ideas, sympathy and empathy. Thank you to the eight Turkish art teacher education instructors who agreed to participate in the study by sharing their thoughts and experiences. I have earnestly tried to represent your truths and I acknowledge the stories of your experiences as the heart of the study. iii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Background of the Problem This study grew out of a both personal and a larger concern about the state of art teacher education in Turkey and the potential of visual culture to produce a change in the way art is taught. There is a need for extensive reflection on and debate about the meaning of art teacher education and its expected outcomes in contemporary Turkish society. Thus, it is important to identify best practices as they relate to visual culture to move toward change at a national level. The literature defines visual culture as a field of study that involves a combination of art history, cultural studies, art education, anthropology, and critical theory. From an art historical perspective, for example, the visual culture movement “raises questions about art itself, its definition, genres, forms, history, criticism, and theoretical ruminations” (Camp, 2004). It considers gaining more in-depth knowledge about the lives; social history of artists that help us to identify and better understand the content of their art; focuses on the cultural meaning of a work of art. From an art educational perspective, visual culture is concerned with popular culture and everyday experiences, and, as Tavin (2005) expresses, visual culture represents a “paradigm shift…advocating for the study of an expansive range of objects and images including popular culture” (p. 111). While the two may have different general definitions, they converge on what it studies. Some proponents of visual culture tie visual culture art education to the concept of social reconstruction due to the social, economic, and political embeddedness of artifacts and performances. “Visual culture art education considers how different societies create identity through visual culture” (Anderson & Milbrandt, 2004, p.53) and so creates a social 1 reconstruction through deconstructing “assumptions, values, and mores”, and ultimately finding “contradictions, disjunctions, and dysfunctions”; thereby moving them out of their positions of power (Anderson & Milbrandt, 2004, p.53). In visual culture art education (VCAE), meaning lies not only in the qualities of the visual object itself and not only in the observer’s response, but in the relationship of the object and viewer in their authentic social context (Anderson & Milbrandt, 2004). Paul Duncum (2001), one of the major proponents of visual culture art education, uses visual culture as an umbrella term to incorporate all visual artifacts (high art to low art, fine art to popular and the folk art) through which we make meaning. The focus to the beliefs, values, and attitudes imbued in those artifacts, thus socially grounding in the context of making and viewing as being as important as the artifacts and performances themselves (Anderson, 2003). Furthermore, as Kerry Freedman (2001) and Duncum (1999, 2001, 2002) suggested, the field of art education should promote critical inquiry using critical pedagogy as a key concept to analyze and interpret images within students’ lives. In this study, visual culture primarily serves as a means of examining the perception and critical analysis of popular culture, everyday cultural experiences (Duncum, 1999, 2001, 2002; Freedman, 2003; Tavin, 2000), and media including television programs, computer games, Internet, and advertisements with an art education focus, it is important to examine the concept of visual culture – ideas that teachers have about it, the impact it might have, the content (objects), and the practices within the context of Turkey. Furthermore, the study strives to investigate visual culture as the reflection of culture because visual culture is embedded in local culture and it deals with socio-economic and political ties of artifacts and performances (Anderson & Milbrandt, 2004). Thus, the study examines the 2 variations in the understanding of the social and ritual meanings of visual forms in the context of Turkey. Anderson & Milbrandt (2004) point out that societies create their identities through the creation, understanding, and interpretation of visual culture. Likewise, those identities are created through the combination of internal and external influences. Because visual culture reflected in visual objects bear implications of definition of the specific culture, the researcher feels the tendency to occasionally change the focus from objects to the concept of visual culture. This fact holds significance in this study. Before discussing the problem and the purpose of the study, it is my attempt to examine the history of the art education and art teacher education in Turkey should be discussed. One cannot understand teacher education in modern Turkey without reference to its historical background, starting with how teaching and learning were defined and the content of education during the Ottoman period. Each must be considered in order to understand the current issues in teacher education in Turkey. Historical Overview of Education During the Ottoman reign (1299-1923)1, the state was primarily interested in educating the military and administrative staff and therefore opened Palace Schools to serve that purpose. Palace Schools only trained the ablest children for leadership positions in the Ottoman body politic, either as military leaders or as high administrators in the provinces of the empire (Kazamias, 1966).