DOCSLIB.ORG

Green Mountain Fire Lookout Relocation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA #OR-010-2004-05) AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI) FOR GREEN MOUNTAIN LOOKOUT The Bureau of Land Management, Lakeview District, has analyzed a proposal and several alternatives to replace the existing fire lookout facility located on Green Mountain in northern Lake County, Oregon. An EA and FONSI have been prepared to document the potential impacts of the proposed action. Copies of the documents are available for review by writing to the Lakeview District Office, 1301 South G Street, Lakeview, Oregon 97630, or by calling Bob Crumrine or Paul Whitman at (541) 947-2177. The documents are also available on the BLM‟s website at http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/lakeview/plans/index.php. Those wishing to provide comments on the proposal must do so, in writing, by May 14, 2009. FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Green Mountain Lookout EA# OR-OIO-2004-05 The Bureau of Land Management, Lakeview District, has analyzed a proposal and several alternatives to replace the existing fire lookout facility located on Green Mountain in north Lake County, Oregon. The new lookout would include water and shower systems, security systems, heating, bathroom, structure improvements, fire-finders, and interior furnishings. The alternatives vary in the amount ofnew access road or road realignment work that would be required. The proposed project is in conformance with applicable land use plans and policies. There are no flood plains, wetlands, riparian areas, water quality, fish or aquatic habitat, threatened, endangered, special status or sensitive species, prime or unique farmlands, wild and scenic rivers, areas ofcritical environmental concern, research natural areas, designated wilderness, wilderness study areas, or other lands with wilderness characteristics, or wild horses in the project area. Based on the analysis contained in the attached EA, there would be no impacts to land status, energy or mineral resources, low income/minority populations, or climate. No significant impacts would occur to air quality, geology, soils, vegetation, wildlife, livestock grazing, visual quality, or recreation. Botanical and cultural surveys have been conducted. No special status plant species occur in the project area. Cultural survey found no sites within project area. On the basis ofthe analysis contained in the attached EA and all other available information, my determination is that none of the alternatives analyzed would constitute a major federal action which would adversely impact the quality of the human environment. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is unnecessary and will not be prepared. \1Z <!' ~.~.c. Yd&~ Thomas E. Rasmussen, Manager Date Lakeview Resource Area EA Number: OR-010-2005-05 PROJECT TITLE/TYPE: GREEN MOUNTAIN FIRE LOOKOUT RELOCATION PROJECT LOCATION: Township 25 South, Range 18 East, Section 19 in north central Lake County, Oregon (see attached maps). BLM OFFICE: Lakeview District Bureau of Land Management 1301 South G Street Lakeview, OR 97630 CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAND USE PLAN: The proposed project is subject to one or more of the following BLM land use plans, policies, or programmatic environmental analyses: Lakeview Resource Management Plan/Record of Decision (2003) Lakeview District Fire Management Plan (2004) Integrated Noxious Weed Control Program (2004) Wildland and Prescribed Fire Management Policy (1998) Fort Rock Fire Management Plan (1996) PURPOSE and NEED FOR ACTION: The existing Green Mountain Lookout is located southeast of the Fort Rock Guard Station and overlooks the northern portion of the Lakeview District, BLM, which has a high summer wildfire occurrence. The wildfire occurrence is so high in this area that the Fort Rock Fire Management Plan (1996) was developed to guide fire suppression decisions. The lookout facility directly supports the fire suppression program in north Lake County. The lookout facility was originally constructed in the late 1970's and has been utilized by many inter-agency cooperators. The current condition of the structure is poor and unsafe. Problems exist with a leaking propane system for heating, cooking, and refrigeration. The catwalk, stairway, and second story floor have areas of large cracks, rotted beams, and loose railings. The water system has been damaged by vandalism. The roof is in need of repair. The windows and solar panels have been vandalized. A shower facility is needed. The entire lookout needs new interior furnishings and rodent-proofing. The insulation in the walls and ceiling of the bottom floor were removed due to past rodent damage and to try to reduce the area rodents could occupy in the future. The facility used to house a seasonal employee, but this can no longer be accommodated due to the poor facility conditions. The main areas of concern are: security (protection from vandalism), repair of the damaged propane and water systems, improve the structural soundness, and addition of lavatory facilities. The facility is located directly off of a designated Back Country Byway which invites more people to travel through the area. This has resulted in increased vandalism in recent years due, in large part, to the relative ease of accessibility and the lack of seasonal resident or other security features at the facility. A new lookout facility is needed to replace the current facility to ensure continued fire watch capability over this high-fire occurrence area during the fire season. Costs for basic repair of the deteriorating facility and vandalism have reached the point where it would be more cost effective to construct a new lookout. DESCRIPTION of PROPOSED ACTION: the proposed action is to provide a safe working environment for fire lookout activities in the Green Mountain area. ALTERNATIVES: Alternatives Analyzed in Detail NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE – Under this alternative, the existing structure on Green Mountain would continue to be used for fire lookout activities. During fire season (Memorial Day weekend to the beginning of fall rains (usually in late October)), a seasonal employee would be stationed on-site during the day with the primary responsibility of locating new wildfire ignitions, but the employee would not reside in the facility. Even with annual repair, the facility would continue to age and the condition of the facility would continue to decline and become less functional over time. ALTERNATIVE 1 – Under this alternative, the existing Green Mountain lookout structure would be torn down and a new structure would be constructed on the current site. The new lookout facility would include water and shower systems, security systems, heating, bathroom facilities, structure improvements, fire-finders, and interior furnishings. BLM Road 6109-00 would be re-aligned below the current road alignment so that public traffic would bypass the lookout (Map 2). Cinder material for the road relocation would come from the existing pit located just south of the existing lookout. The existing road to the top of Green Mountain would be left in place, but a security gate would be constructed at the road entrance so the site could be closed to non-administrative vehicle traffic. Public foot access would still be allowed. Prior to demolition of the existing structure, an analysis of possible material hazards would be completed by contractor licensed to handle hazardous materials. Demolition debris would be taken to a licensed landfill. An employee would seasonally reside in the new facility, typically from Memorial Day weekend to the beginning of fall rains (usually in late October), with the primary responsibility of locating new wildfire ignitions. This would aid in facility security and prevent future vandalism. ALTERNATIVE 2 – Under this alternative, a new lookout would be built on a different location on East Green Mountain. The new lookout facility would include water and shower systems, security systems, heating, bathroom facilities, structure improvements, fire-finders, and interior furnishings. A new access route would be constructed from the Green Mountain Cinder Pit (Map 2). If needed, the existing cinder pit access road would be repaired following construction activities. Cinder material for the new access road and/or road repair would come from the existing pit. A security gate would be constructed at the road entrance to close the site to non-administrative vehicle traffic. Public foot access would still be allowed. The existing structure would either be removed, as described for Alternative 1, or turned into a recreation site as part of a program that renovates historic fire lookout facilities and then rents them to people who wish to stay there. This renovation activity would be dependent upon the availability of future recreation funding sources and would require a separate NEPA analysis prior to renovation. An employee would seasonally reside in the new facility, similar to Alternative 1. ALTERNATIVE 3 – Under this alternative, a new lookout would be built on East Green Mountain similar to Alternative 2. A new access route would be constructed from BLM Road 6109-00 (Map 2). Cinder material for the new access road would come from the existing pit. The existing lookout structure would be demolished or renovated as described for Alternative 2. Best Management Practices Common to Alternatives 1-3 There are no riparian areas, perennial stream banks, or other waters of concern that would receive any sediment from the proposed road construction activities. Best Management Practices
Recommended publications
  • The Rising Cost of Wildfire Protection

    The Rising Cost of Wildfire Protection

    A Research Paper by The Rising Cost of Wildfire Protection Ross Gorte, Ph.D. Retired Senior Policy Analyst, Congressional Research Service Affiliate Research Professor, Earth Systems Research Center of the Earth, Oceans, and Space Institute, University of New Hampshire June 2013 The Rising Cost of Wildfire Protection June 2013 PUBLISHED ONLINE: http://headwaterseconomics.org/wildfire/fire-costs-background/ ABOUT THIS REPORT Headwaters Economics produced this report to better understand and address why wildfires are becoming more severe and expensive. The report also describes how the protection of homes in the Wildland-Urban Interface has added to these costs and concludes with a brief discussion of solutions that may help control escalating costs. Headwaters Economics is making a long-term commitment to better understanding these issues. For additional resources, see: http://headwaterseconomics.org/wildfire. ABOUT HEADWATERS ECONOMICS Headwaters Economics is an independent, nonprofit research group whose mission is to improve community development and land management decisions in the West. CONTACT INFORMATION Ray Rasker, Ph.D. Executive Director, Headwaters Economics [email protected] 406 570-7044 Ross Gorte, Ph.D.: http://www.eos.unh.edu/Faculty/rosswgorte P.O. Box 7059 Bozeman, MT 59771 http://headwaterseconomics.org Cover image “Firewise” by Monte Dolack used by permission, Monty Dolack Gallery, Missoula Montana. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................
  • LOOKOUT NETWORK (ISSN 2154-4417), Is Published Quarterly by the Forest Fire Lookout Association, Inc., Keith Argow, Publisher, 374 Maple Nielsen

    LOOKOUT NETWORK (ISSN 2154-4417), Is Published Quarterly by the Forest Fire Lookout Association, Inc., Keith Argow, Publisher, 374 Maple Nielsen

    VOL. 26 NO. 4 WINTER 2015-2016 LLOOKOOKOUTOUT NETWNETWORKORK THE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE FOREST FIRE LOOKOUT ASSOCIATION, INC. · 2016 Western Conference - June 10-12, John Day, Oregon · FFLA Loses Founding Member - Henry Isenberg · Northeast Conference - September 17-18, New York www.firelookout.org ON THE LOOKOUT From the National Chairman Keith A. Argow Vienna, Virginia Winter 2015-2016 FIRE TOWERS IN THE HEART OF DIXIE On Saturday, January 16 we convened the 26th annual member of the Alabama Forestry Commission who had meeting of the Forest Fire Lookout Association at the Talladega purchased and moved a fire tower to his woodlands; the project Ranger Station, on the Talladega National Forest in Talladega, leader of the Smith Mountain fire tower restoration; the publisher Alabama (guess that is somewhere near Talladega!). Our host, of a travel magazine that promoted the restoration; a retired District Ranger Gloria Nielsen, and Alabama National Forests district forester with the Alabama Forestry Commission; a U.S. Assistant Archaeologist Marcus Ridley presented a fine Forest Service District Ranger (our host), and a zone program including a review of the multi-year Horn Mountain archaeologist for the Forest Service. Add just two more Lookout restoration. A request by the radio communications members and we will have the makings of a potentially very people to construct a new effective chapter in Alabama. communications tower next to The rest of afternoon was spent with an inspection of the the lookout occasioned a continuing Horn Mountain Lookout restoration project, plus visits review on its impact on the 100-foot Horn Mountain Fire Tower, an historic landmark visible for many miles.
  • Prineville Interagency Hotshot Crew Ochoco & Deschutes National Forests and Prineville BLM Central Oregon Fire Management Service

    Prineville Interagency Hotshot Crew Ochoco & Deschutes National Forests and Prineville BLM Central Oregon Fire Management Service

    Prineville Interagency Hotshot Crew Ochoco & Deschutes National Forests and Prineville BLM Central Oregon Fire Management Service OUTREACH NOTICE The Ochoco National Forest will soon be filling 2- GS-0462-04/05 Interagency Hotshot Crew Senior Firefighter positions. These positions are permanent seasonal positions with a tour of duty that includes full-time or less than full-time (guaranteed minimum 6 months/13 pay periods of full-time employment). If on a seasonal schedule, you will be placed in a non-pay status for the rest of the season. Duty station is located in Prineville, Oregon. OCRP-462-IHC/HCREW-4/5DP https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetail/328826500 Demo OCRP-462-IHC/HCREW-4/5G https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetail/328826400 Merit PLEASE NOTE: The purpose of this outreach notice is to determine the potential applicant pool for this position and to establish the appropriate recruitment method and area of consideration for the advertisement. Responses received from this outreach notice will be relied upon to make this determination. Reply due date to this outreach notice is January 28, 2013. THE POSITION: The position is located on a wildland fire crew (Prineville Interagency Hotshot Crew). The purpose of the position is wildland fire suppression/management/control as a specialized firefighter with responsibility for the operation and maintenance of specialized tools or equipment. Other wildland fire related duties may involve fire prevention, patrol, detection, or prescribed burning. These are permanent positions with varying tours of duty and may include weekend work. Some positions may have irregular and protracted hours of work.
  • A History of the Arôhitecture Of

    A History of the Arôhitecture Of

    United States Department of Agriculture A History of the I Forest Service Engineering Staff EM-731 0-8 Arôhitecture of the July 1999 USDA Forest Service a EM-731 0-8 C United States Department of Agriculture A History of the Forest Service EngIneering Staff EM-731 0-8 Architecture of the July 1999 USDA Forest Service by John A. Grosvenor, Architect Pacific Southwest Region Dedication and Acknowledgements This book is dedicated to all of those architects andbuilding designers who have provided the leadership and design expertise tothe USDA Forest Service building program from the inception of theagencyto Harry Kevich, my mentor and friend whoguided my career in the Forest Service, and especially to W. Ellis Groben, who provided the onlyprofessional architec- tural leadership from Washington. DC. I salute thearchaeologists, histori- ans, and historic preservation teamswho are active in preserving the architectural heritage of this unique organization. A special tribute goes to my wife, Caro, whohas supported all of my activi- ties these past 38 years in our marriage and in my careerwith the Forest Service. In the time it has taken me to compile this document, scoresof people throughout the Forest Service have provided information,photos, and drawings; told their stories; assisted In editing my writingattempts; and expressed support for this enormous effort. Active andretired architects from all the Forest Service Regions as well as severalof the research sta- tions have provided specific informationregarding their history. These individuals are too numerous to mention by namehere, but can be found throughout the document. I do want to mention the personwho is most responsible for my undertaking this task: Linda Lux,the Regional Historian in Region 5, who urged me to put somethingdown in writing before I retired.
  • Examining Dispatching Practices for Interagency Hotshot Crews to Reduce Seasonal Travel Distance and Manage Fatigue

    Examining Dispatching Practices for Interagency Hotshot Crews to Reduce Seasonal Travel Distance and Manage Fatigue

    CSIRO PUBLISHING International Journal of Wildland Fire 2018, 27, 569–580 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF17163 Examining dispatching practices for Interagency Hotshot Crews to reduce seasonal travel distance and manage fatigue Erin J. BelvalA,D, David E. CalkinB, Yu WeiA, Crystal S. StonesiferB, Matthew P. ThompsonC and Alex MasarieA ADepartment of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA. BUSDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 800 E Beckwith Avenue, Missoula, MT 59801, USA. CUSDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 240 W Prospect Road, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Interagency Hotshot Crews (IHCs) are a crucial firefighting suppression resource in the United States. These crews travel substantial distances each year and work long and arduous assignments that can cause accumulated fatigue. Current dispatching practices for these crews are supposed to send the closest resource while adhering to existing fatigue- management policies. In this research, we designed a simulation process that repeatedly implements an optimisation model to assign crews to suppression requests. This study examines the potential effects of using an optimisation approach to shorten seasonal crew travel distances and mitigate fatigue. We also examine the potential benefits of coordinating crew-dispatch decisions to meet multiple requests. Results indicate there is substantial room for improvement in reducing travel distances while still balancing crew fatigue; coordinating crew dispatching for multiple requests can increase the assignment efficiency, particularly when both fatigue mitigation and travel distances are jointly optimised. This research indicates implementing an optimisation model for dispatching IHCs is promising.
  • 2015 Fire Season and Wildfire Management Program Review

    2015 Fire Season and Wildfire Management Program Review

    Review of Alberta Agriculture and Forestry’s Wildfire Management Program and the 2015 Fire Season Volume 1: Summary Report Prepared By: MNP LLP Suite 1600, MNP Tower 10235 – 101 Street NW Edmonton, AB T5J 3G1 Prepared For: Forestry Division, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry 10th Floor Petroleum Plaza South Tower 9915 - 108 Street Edmonton, AB T5K 2G8 Date: December 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Alberta’s 2015 Wildfire Management Program ................................................. 1 2. The 2015 Fire Season ......................................................................................... 4 3. A Review and Evaluation of Alberta’s Wildfire Management Program .......... 7 3.1 Wildfire Prevention Program ................................................................................... 7 3.2 Wildfire Detection .................................................................................................. 12 3.3 Presuppression Preparedness .............................................................................. 14 3.4 Suppression .......................................................................................................... 16 3.5 Policy and Planning .............................................................................................. 18 3.6 Resource Sharing and Mutual Aid......................................................................... 20 4. Flat Top Complex Recommendations ............................................................ 23 4.1 Evaluation of Fulfillment of the Flat Top Review Recommendations
  • Fire Lookouts Eldorado National Forest

    Fire Lookouts Eldorado National Forest

    United States Department of Agriculture Fire Lookouts Eldorado National Forest Background Fire suppression became a national priority around 1910, when the country was stricken by what has been considered the largest wildfire in US history. The Big Blowup fire as it was called, burned over 3,000,000 acres (12,000 km) in Washington, Idaho, and Montana. After the Big Blowup, Fire Lookout towers were built across the country in hopes of preventing another “Blowup”. At this time Plummer Lookout. Can lookouts were primarily found in tall trees with rickety ladders and you see the 2 people? platforms or on high peaks with canvas tents for shelters. This job was not for the faint of heart. This did little to offer long‐term support for the much needed “Fire Watcher”, so by 1911 permanent cabins and cupolas were constructed on Mountain Ridges, Peaks, and tops. In California, between 1933 and 1942, Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) crews reportedly built 250 fire lookout towers. These crews also helped build access roads for the construction of these towers. Fire lookouts were at peak use from the 1930s through the 1950s. During World War II fire lookouts were assigned additional duties as Enemy Aircraft Spotters protecting the countries coastal lines and beaches. By the 1960s the Fire Lookouts were being used less frequently due to the rise in technology. Many lookouts were closed, or turned in to recreational facilities. Big Hill On the Eldorado ... Maintained and staffed 7 days a week The Eldorado Naonal Forest originally had 9 lookouts at the during fire season the Big Hill Lookout is beginning of the century.
  • 1933–1941, a New Deal for Forest Service Research in California

    1933–1941, a New Deal for Forest Service Research in California

    The Search for Forest Facts: A History of the Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1926–2000 Chapter 4: 1933–1941, A New Deal for Forest Service Research in California By the time President Franklin Delano Roosevelt won his landslide election in 1932, forest research in the United States had grown considerably from the early work of botanical explorers such as Andre Michaux and his classic Flora Boreali- Americana (Michaux 1803), which first revealed the Nation’s wealth and diversity of forest resources in 1803. Exploitation and rapid destruction of forest resources had led to the establishment of a federal Division of Forestry in 1876, and as the number of scientists professionally trained to manage and administer forest land grew in America, it became apparent that our knowledge of forestry was not entirely adequate. So, within 3 years after the reorganization of the Bureau of Forestry into the Forest Service in 1905, a series of experiment stations was estab- lished throughout the country. In 1915, a need for a continuing policy in forest research was recognized by the formation of the Branch of Research (BR) in the Forest Service—an action that paved the way for unified, nationwide attacks on the obvious and the obscure problems of American forestry. This idea developed into A National Program of Forest Research (Clapp 1926) that finally culminated in the McSweeney-McNary Forest Research Act (McSweeney-McNary Act) of 1928, which authorized a series of regional forest experiment stations and the undertaking of research in each of the major fields of forestry. Then on March 4, 1933, President Roosevelt was inaugurated, and during the “first hundred days” of Roosevelt’s administration, Congress passed his New Deal plan, putting the country on a better economic footing during a desperate time in the Nation’s history.
  • Umatilla NF Recruitment Info Brochure.Indd

    Umatilla NF Recruitment Info Brochure.Indd

    Seasonal Positions Available The Umatilla National Forest is seeking motivated individuals to fill natural resource and firefighting United States Department of Agriculture positions. These are federal positions that require hard work and dedication. A passion for the outdoors is required. RECRUITMENT INFORMATION Start Your Career Many career Forest Service employees started out as We will being accepting seasonal employees, this is how they “got their foot in applications from the door”. November 14 to Many firefighting jobs look for wildland fire experience November 20! and training. Each seasonal employee will have an opportunity to attend an on-the-job firefighter training. Setup your profile now on This training, called “Guard School”, is a one week school USAjobs.gov! covering the basics of wildland fire suppression, fire behavior, human factors, and the incident command system (S-130, S-190, S-110, I-100, L-180). Upon completion of “Guard School” the employee will be qualified to fight wildland fire as a Fire Fighter Type 2. Applying through USAJOBS Contact Informati on All applications must be submitted through usajobs.gov. htt ps://www.fs.usda.gov/main As with any online job site, the application process /umati lla/about-forest/jobs requires information about you that may not be readily www.facebook.com/Umati llaNF/ available. We recommend gathering information, creating a profile, and giving yourself ample time to Umati lla Nati onal Forest complete the application process. Applications must be Supervisor’s Offi ce 72510 Coyote Road submitted by the time indicated on the closing date. We Pendleton, OR 97801 are unable to accept late applications.
  • Spatial Patterns and Physical Factors of Smokejumper Utilization Since 2004

    Spatial Patterns and Physical Factors of Smokejumper Utilization Since 2004

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2014 SPATIAL PATTERNS AND PHYSICAL FACTORS OF SMOKEJUMPER UTILIZATION SINCE 2004 Tyson A. Atkinson University of Montana - Missoula Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Forest Management Commons, and the Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Atkinson, Tyson A., "SPATIAL PATTERNS AND PHYSICAL FACTORS OF SMOKEJUMPER UTILIZATION SINCE 2004" (2014). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4384. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4384 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPATIAL PATTERNS AND PHYSICAL FACTORS OF SMOKEJUMPER UTILIZATION SINCE 2004 By TYSON ALLEN ATKINSON Bachelor of Science, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 2009 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Forestry The University of Montana Missoula, MT December 2014 Approved by: Sandy Ross, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Dr. Carl A. Seielstad, Chair Department of Forest Management Dr. LLoyd P. Queen Department of Forest Management Dr. Charles G. Palmer Department of Health and Human Performance Atkinson, Tyson Allen, M.S., December 2014 Forestry Spatial Patterns and Physical Factors of Smokejumper Utilization since 2004 Chairperson: Dr. Carl Seielstad Abstract: This research examines patterns of aerial smokejumper usage in the United States.
  • LOOKOUT NETWORK (ISSN 2154-4417), Is Published Quarterly by the ($6.85 + S/H)

    LOOKOUT NETWORK (ISSN 2154-4417), Is Published Quarterly by the ($6.85 + S/H)

    VOL. 22 NO. 2 SUMMER 2011 LLOOKOOKOUTOUT NETWNETWORKORK THE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE FOREST FIRE LOOKOUT ASSOCIATION, INC. · Western Conference - Mt Hood, Oregon September 16-18 · Boucher Hill Coming to Life Soon · Historic Maine Lookout Lost www.firelookout.org ON THE LOOKOUT From the National Chairman Keith A. Argow Vienna, Virginia Summer 2011 WEAR YOUR FIRE LOOKOUT BADGE PROUDLY! IT EXPRESSES BOTH YOUR COMMITMENT AND THE on duty is an employee. Yet of the 12 active lookouts in OPPORTUNITY FOR OTHERS TO SERVE Southern California, only one is staffed by a paid lookout. Our communal efforts and hard work to protect fire YOUR CHANCE TO HAND OUT A FFLA BROCHURE! lookouts comes from a love of these vintage structures as well When folks see these badges with the distinctive FFLA as our enjoyment of the beautiful views they afford. We also logo, they are likely to ask about our association. Voila! Here appreciate the trees and forests they were built to protect. Most is the opportunity to present them with the FFLA brochure! Let of us have spent time as a volunteer or paid fire lookout them know how they can become involved in either observer. Those who haven't had this opportunity likely harbor maintenance or staffing as a volunteer. A select few will even the dream that they may one day wear this badge of honor. If adopt a favorite lookout as the Lookout Steward by making not, at the very least they know they have helped keep these application through their state director, with the approval of the symbols of forestry up on the skyline for future generations of agency confirmed by the national chair.
  • Fire Behaviour As a Factor in Forest and Rural Fire Suppression

    Fire Behaviour As a Factor in Forest and Rural Fire Suppression

    Fire behaviour as a factor in forest and rural fire suppression Martin E. Alexander Forest Research Bulletin No. 197 Forest and Rural Fire Scientific and Technical Series Report No. 5 Other reports printed in the Forest and Rural Fire Scientific and Technical Series (Forest Research Bulletin No. 197) include: 1. Fogarty, L.G. 1996. Two rural/urban interface fires in the Wellington suburb of Karori: assessment of associated burning conditions and fire control strategies. 2. Rasmussen, J.H.; Fogarty, L.G. 1997. A case study of grassland fire behaviour and suppression: the Tikokino Fire of 31 January 1991. 3. Fogarty, L.G.; Jackson, A.F.; Lindsay, W.T. 1997. Fire behaviour, suppression and lessons from the Berwick Forest Fire of 26 February 1995. 4. Pearce, H.G.; Hamilton, R.W.; Millman, R.I. 2000. Fire behaviour and firefighter safety implications associated with the Bucklands Crossing Fire burnover of 24 March 1998. Cover Photographs: Upper left – Fire behaviour during the 1995 Berwick Forest Fire, Otago. Upper right – Whakamaru lookout in Kinleith Forest, Central North Island. Lower left – Aerial suppression during the 1994 Montgomery Crescent Fire, in the suburb of Karori, Wellington. Lower right – Fire suppression during a simulated fire exercise in Kinleith Forest, March 1993. Paper Reprint Fire behaviour as a factor in forest and rural fire suppression* Martin E. Alexander (Senior Fire Research Officer, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) This paper was originally presented at the Forest and Rural Fire Association of New Zealand (FRFANZ) 2nd Annual Conference, 5-7 August 1992, Christchurch, when the author was a Visiting Fire Research Scientist on a 12 month secondment to the New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand.