Measurements of Electrical Quantities - Ján Šaliga
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Determination of the Magnetic Permeability, Electrical Conductivity
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TII.2018.2885406, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics TII-18-2870 1 Determination of the magnetic permeability, electrical conductivity, and thickness of ferrite metallic plates using a multi-frequency electromagnetic sensing system Mingyang Lu, Yuedong Xie, Wenqian Zhu, Anthony Peyton, and Wuliang Yin, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract—In this paper, an inverse method was developed by the sensor are not only dependent on the magnetic which can, in principle, reconstruct arbitrary permeability, permeability of the strip but is also an unwanted function of the conductivity, thickness, and lift-off with a multi-frequency electrical conductivity and thickness of the strip and the electromagnetic sensor from inductance spectroscopic distance between the strip steel and the sensor (lift-off). The measurements. confounding cross-sensitivities to these parameters need to be Both the finite element method and the Dodd & Deeds rejected by the processing algorithms applied to inductance formulation are used to solve the forward problem during the spectra. inversion process. For the inverse solution, a modified Newton– Raphson method was used to adjust each set of parameters In recent years, the eddy current technique (ECT) [2-5] and (permeability, conductivity, thickness, and lift-off) to fit the alternating current potential drop (ACPD) technique [6-8] inductances (measured or simulated) in a least-squared sense were the two primary electromagnetic non-destructive testing because of its known convergence properties. The approximate techniques (NDT) [9-21] on metals’ permeability Jacobian matrix (sensitivity matrix) for each set of the parameter measurements. -
3.Joule's Experiments
The Force of Gravity Creates Energy: The “Work” of James Prescott Joule http://www.bookrags.com/biography/james-prescott-joule-wsd/ James Prescott Joule (1818-1889) was the son of a successful British brewer. He tinkered with the tools of his father’s trade (particularly thermometers), and despite never earning an undergraduate degree, he was able to answer two rather simple questions: 1. Why is the temperature of the water at the bottom of a waterfall higher than the temperature at the top? 2. Why does an electrical current flowing through a conductor raise the temperature of water? In order to adequately investigate these questions on our own, we need to first define “temperature” and “energy.” Second, we should determine how the measurement of temperature can relate to “heat” (as energy). Third, we need to find relationships that might exist between temperature and “mechanical” energy and also between temperature and “electrical” energy. Definitions: Before continuing, please write down what you know about temperature and energy below. If you require more space, use the back. Temperature: Energy: We have used the concept of gravity to show how acceleration of freely falling objects is related mathematically to distance, time, and speed. We have also used the relationship between net force applied through a distance to define “work” in the Harvard Step Test. Now, through the work of Joule, we can equate the concepts of “work” and “energy”: Energy is the capacity of a physical system to do work. Potential energy is “stored” energy, kinetic energy is “moving” energy. One type of potential energy is that induced by the gravitational force between two objects held at a distance (there are other types of potential energy, including electrical, magnetic, chemical, nuclear, etc). -
Units in Electromagnetism (PDF)
Units in electromagnetism Almost all textbooks on electricity and magnetism (including Griffiths’s book) use the same set of units | the so-called rationalized or Giorgi units. These have the advantage of common use. On the other hand there are all sorts of \0"s and \µ0"s to memorize. Could anyone think of a system that doesn't have all this junk to memorize? Yes, Carl Friedrich Gauss could. This problem describes the Gaussian system of units. [In working this problem, keep in mind the distinction between \dimensions" (like length, time, and charge) and \units" (like meters, seconds, and coulombs).] a. In the Gaussian system, the measure of charge is q q~ = p : 4π0 Write down Coulomb's law in the Gaussian system. Show that in this system, the dimensions ofq ~ are [length]3=2[mass]1=2[time]−1: There is no need, in this system, for a unit of charge like the coulomb, which is independent of the units of mass, length, and time. b. The electric field in the Gaussian system is given by F~ E~~ = : q~ How is this measure of electric field (E~~) related to the standard (Giorgi) field (E~ )? What are the dimensions of E~~? c. The magnetic field in the Gaussian system is given by r4π B~~ = B~ : µ0 What are the dimensions of B~~ and how do they compare to the dimensions of E~~? d. In the Giorgi system, the Lorentz force law is F~ = q(E~ + ~v × B~ ): p What is the Lorentz force law expressed in the Gaussian system? Recall that c = 1= 0µ0. -
Measuring Electricity Voltage Current Voltage Current
Measuring Electricity Electricity makes our lives easier, but it can seem like a mysterious force. Measuring electricity is confusing because we cannot see it. We are familiar with terms such as watt, volt, and amp, but we do not have a clear understanding of these terms. We buy a 60-watt lightbulb, a tool that needs 120 volts, or a vacuum cleaner that uses 8.8 amps, and dont think about what those units mean. Using the flow of water as an analogy can make Voltage electricity easier to understand. The flow of electrons in a circuit is similar to water flowing through a hose. If you could look into a hose at a given point, you would see a certain amount of water passing that point each second. The amount of water depends on how much pressure is being applied how hard the water is being pushed. It also depends on the diameter of the hose. The harder the pressure and the larger the diameter of the hose, the more water passes each second. The flow of electrons through a wire depends on the electrical pressure pushing the electrons and on the Current cross-sectional area of the wire. The flow of electrons can be compared to the flow of Voltage water. The water current is the number of molecules flowing past a fixed point; electrical current is the The pressure that pushes electrons in a circuit is number of electrons flowing past a fixed point. called voltage. Using the water analogy, if a tank of Electrical current (I) is defined as electrons flowing water were suspended one meter above the ground between two points having a difference in voltage. -
On the First Electromagnetic Measurement of the Velocity of Light by Wilhelm Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch
Andre Koch Torres Assis On the First Electromagnetic Measurement of the Velocity of Light by Wilhelm Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch Abstract The electrostatic, electrodynamic and electromagnetic systems of units utilized during last century by Ampère, Gauss, Weber, Maxwell and all the others are analyzed. It is shown how the constant c was introduced in physics by Weber's force of 1846. It is shown that it has the unit of velocity and is the ratio of the electromagnetic and electrostatic units of charge. Weber and Kohlrausch's experiment of 1855 to determine c is quoted, emphasizing that they were the first to measure this quantity and obtained the same value as that of light velocity in vacuum. It is shown how Kirchhoff in 1857 and Weber (1857-64) independently of one another obtained the fact that an electromagnetic signal propagates at light velocity along a thin wire of negligible resistivity. They obtained the telegraphy equation utilizing Weber’s action at a distance force. This was accomplished before the development of Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory of light and before Heaviside’s work. 1. Introduction In this work the introduction of the constant c in electromagnetism by Wilhelm Weber in 1846 is analyzed. It is the ratio of electromagnetic and electrostatic units of charge, one of the most fundamental constants of nature. The meaning of this constant is discussed, the first measurement performed by Weber and Kohlrausch in 1855, and the derivation of the telegraphy equation by Kirchhoff and Weber in 1857. Initially the basic systems of units utilized during last century for describing electromagnetic quantities is presented, along with a short review of Weber’s electrodynamics. -
Made to Measure. Practical Guide to Electrical Measurements in Low Voltage Switchboards V
Contact us A 250 500 200 150 V (b) 100 (a) 50 0 t Made to measure. Practical guide to electrical measurements in low voltage switchboards A 250 500 ABB SACE The data and illustrations are not binding. We reserve 200 the right to modify the contents of this document on the 150 Una divisione di ABB S.p.A. basis of technical development of the products, 100 Apparecchi Modulari without prior notice. 50 0 Viale dell’Industria, 18 Copyright 2010 ABB. All rights reserved. - 1.500 - CAL. 20010 Vittuone (MI) Tel.: 02 9034 1 Fax: 02 9034 7609 bol.it.abb.com www.abb.com V 80 V 60 2CSC445012D0201 - 12/2010 (f) 40 50 Hz 20 0 t Made to measure. Practical guide to electrical measurements in low voltage switchboards table of Made to measure. Practical guide to electrical measurements contents in low voltage switchboards 1 Electrical measurements 5.3.2 Current transformers ......................................................... 37 5.3.3 Voltage transformers ......................................................... 38 1.1 Why is it important to measure? .......................................... 3 5.3.4 Shunts for direct current .................................................... 38 1.2 Applicational contexts .......................................................... 4 1.3 Problems connected with energy networks ......................... 4 6 The measurements 1.4 Reducing consumption ........................................................ 7 1.5 Table of charges .................................................................. 8 6.1 TRMS Measurements -
On the Nature of Electric Charge
Vol. 9(4), pp. 54-60, 28 February, 2014 DOI: 10.5897/IJPS2013.4091 ISSN 1992 - 1950 International Journal of Physical Copyright © 2014 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article Sciences http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPS Full Length Research Paper On the nature of electric charge Jafari Najafi, Mahdi 1730 N Lynn ST apt A35, Arlington, VA 22209 USA. Received 10 December, 2013; Accepted 14 February, 2014 A few hundred years have passed since the discovery of electricity and electromagnetic fields, formulating them as Maxwell's equations, but the nature of an electric charge remains unknown. Why do particles with the same charge repel and opposing charges attract? Is the electric charge a primary intrinsic property of a particle? These questions cannot be answered until the nature of the electric charge is identified. The present study provides an explicit description of the gravitational constant G and the origin of electric charge will be inferred using generalized dimensional analysis. Key words: Electric charge, gravitational constant, dimensional analysis, particle mass change. INTRODUCTION The universe is composed of three basic elements; parameters. This approach is of great generality and mass-energy (M), length (L), and time (T). Intrinsic mathematical simplicity that simply and directly properties are assigned to particles, including mass, postulates a hypothesis for the nature of the electric electric charge, and spin, and their effects are applied in charge. Although the final formula is a guesswork based the form of physical formulas that explicitly address on dimensional analysis of electric charges, it shows the physical phenomena. The meaning of some particle existence of consistency between the final formula and properties remains opaque. -
Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI)
Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) m kg s cd SI mol K A NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Ambler Thompson and Barry N. Taylor NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Ambler Thompson Technology Services and Barry N. Taylor Physics Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, 1995 Edition, April 1995) March 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology James M. Turner, Acting Director National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 811, 2008 Edition (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, April 1995 Edition) Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 811, 2008 Ed., 85 pages (March 2008; 2nd printing November 2008) CODEN: NSPUE3 Note on 2nd printing: This 2nd printing dated November 2008 of NIST SP811 corrects a number of minor typographical errors present in the 1st printing dated March 2008. Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Preface The International System of Units, universally abbreviated SI (from the French Le Système International d’Unités), is the modern metric system of measurement. Long the dominant measurement system used in science, the SI is becoming the dominant measurement system used in international commerce. The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of August 1988 [Public Law (PL) 100-418] changed the name of the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and gave to NIST the added task of helping U.S. -
Modeling Optical Metamaterials with Strong Spatial Dispersion
Fakultät für Physik Institut für theoretische Festkörperphysik Modeling Optical Metamaterials with Strong Spatial Dispersion M. Sc. Karim Mnasri von der KIT-Fakultät für Physik des Karlsruher Instituts für Technologie (KIT) genehmigte Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines DOKTORS DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN (Dr. rer. nat.) Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29. November 2019 Referent: Prof. Dr. Carsten Rockstuhl (Institut für theoretische Festkörperphysik) Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Michael Plum (Institut für Analysis) KIT – Die Forschungsuniversität in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Erklärung zur Selbstständigkeit Ich versichere, dass ich diese Arbeit selbstständig verfasst habe und keine anderen als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel benutzt habe, die wörtlich oder inhaltlich über- nommenen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht und die Satzung des KIT zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis in der gültigen Fassung vom 24. Mai 2018 beachtet habe. Karlsruhe, den 21. Oktober 2019, Karim Mnasri Als Prüfungsexemplar genehmigt von Karlsruhe, den 28. Oktober 2019, Prof. Dr. Carsten Rockstuhl iv To Ouiem and Adam Thesis abstract Optical metamaterials are artificial media made from subwavelength inclusions with un- conventional properties at optical frequencies. While a response to the magnetic field of light in natural material is absent, metamaterials prompt to lift this limitation and to exhibit a response to both electric and magnetic fields at optical frequencies. Due tothe interplay of both the actual shape of the inclusions and the material from which they are made, but also from the specific details of their arrangement, the response canbe driven to one or multiple resonances within a desired frequency band. With such a high number of degrees of freedom, tedious trial-and-error simulations and costly experimen- tal essays are inefficient when considering optical metamaterials in the design of specific applications. -
Electromagnetism
Electromagnetism Electric Charge Two types: positive and negative Like charges repel, opposites attract Forces come in a matched pair Each charge pushes or pulls on the other Forces have equal magnitudes and opposite directions Forces increase with decreasing separation Charge is quantized Charge is an intrinsic property of matter Electrons are negatively charged (-1.6 x 10-19 coulomb’s each) Protons are positively charged (+1.6 x 10-19 coulomb’s each) Net charge is the sum of an object’s charges Most objects have zero net charge (neutral – equal numbers of + and -) Electric Fields Charges push on each other through empty space Charge one creates an “electric field” This electric field pushes on charge two An electric field is a structure in space that pushes on electric charge The magnitude of the field is proportional to the magnitude of the force on a test charge The direction of the field is the direction of the force on a positive test charge Magnetic Poles Two Types: north and south Like poles repel, opposites attract Forces come in matched pairs Forces increase with decreasing separation Analogous to electric charges EXCEPT: No isolated magnetic poles have ever been found! Net pole on an object is always zero! Most atoms are magnetic, but most materials are not Atomic magnetism is perfectly cancelled Material is indifferent to nearby magnetic poles Some materials do not have full cancellation Ferromagnetic materials respond to magnetic poles Magnetic Fields A magnetic field is a structure in space that pushes on magnetic poles -
Keithley Instrumentation for Electrochemical Test Methods and Applications ––
Keithley Instrumentation for Electrochemical Test Methods and Applications –– APPLICATION NOTE Keithley Instrumentation for Electrochemical Test Methods and Applications APPLICATION NOTE With more than 60 years of measurement expertise, Keithley Cyclic Voltammetry Instruments is a world leader in advanced electronic test Cyclic voltammetry (CV), a type of potential sweep method, instrumentation. Our customers are scientists and engineers is the most commonly used electrochemical measurement in a wide range of research and industrial applications, technique, which typically uses a 3-electrode cell. Figure including many electrochemistry tests. Keithley manufactures 1 illustrates a typical electrochemical measurement circuit products that can source and measure current and voltage made up of an electrochemical cell, an adjustable voltage accurately. Electrochemistry disciplines that employ source (V ), an ammeter (A ), and a voltmeter (V ). The Keithley instrumentation include battery and energy storage, S M M three electrodes of the electrochemical cell are the working corrosion science, electrochemical deposition, organic electrode (WE), the reference electrode (RE), and the counter electronics, photo-electrochemistry, material research, electrode (CE). The voltage source (V ) for the potential sensors, and semiconductor materials and devices. Table 1 S scan is applied between the WE and CE. The potential (E) lists some of the test methods and applications that employ between the RE and WE is measured with the voltmeter, and Keithley products. the overall voltage (VS) is adjusted to maintain the desired Table 1. Electrochemistry test methods and applications potential at the WE with respect to the RE. The resulting Methods and Measurement current (i) flowing to or from the WE is measured with the Capabilities Applications ammeter (AM). -
Topic 0991 Electrochemical Units Electric Current the SI Base
Topic 0991 Electrochemical Units Electric Current The SI base electrical unit is the AMPERE which is that constant electric current which if maintained in two straight parallel conductors of infinite length and of negligible circular cross section and placed a metre apart in a vacuum would produce between these conductors a force equal to 2 x 10-7 newton per metre length. It is interesting to note that definition of the Ampere involves a derived SI unit, the newton. Except in certain specialised applications, electric currents of the order ‘amperes’ are rare. Starter motors in cars require for a short time a current of several amperes. When a current of one ampere passes through a wire about 6.2 x 1018 electrons pass a given point in one second [1,2]. The coulomb (symbol C) is the electric charge which passes through an electrical conductor when an electric current of one A flows for one second. Thus [C] = [A s] (a) Electric Potential In order to pass an electric current thorough an electrical conductor a difference in electric potential must exist across the electrical conductor. If the energy expended by a flow of one ampere for one second equals one Joule the electric potential difference across the electrical conductor is one volt [3]. Electrical Resistance and Conductance If the electric potential difference across an electrical conductor is one volt when the electrical current is one ampere, the electrical resistance is one ohm, symbol Ω [4]. The inverse of electrical resistance , the conductance, is measured using the unit siemens, symbol [S].