National Euro Changeover Plan for the Czech Republic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Euro Changeover Plan for the Czech Republic National Coordination Group for Euro Changeover in the Czech Republic National Euro Changeover Plan for the Czech Republic 2007 Content National Euro Changeover Plan for the Czech Republic Part I Basic Information 1 Introduction . 7. 1 Review of actions undertaken so far . 8. 2 Single-step transition to the euro . 9. 2 Basic principles of the changeover in the Czech Republic . .10 3 The changeover timetable . .13 4 The changeover preparation process . .14 1 Euro area enlargement procedure of EU institutions . .15 2 Updates of the National Changeover Plan . 3 Institutional arrangements for the changeover . .16 1 The National Coordinator and the National Coordination Group . 2 NCG Working Groups . 3 NCG Organisational Committee . .17 4 Method for assessing the changeover preparations . 5 Summary of main tasks in individual sectors . .18 1 Banks and other financial sector institutions . 2 Public finances and central and local government . .19 3 The non-financial sector and consumer protection . .20 4 Legislative requirements for the changeover . .21 1 Summary of the changeover legislation, including judgments . .22 2 Implementation of the changeover into Czech law . .23 5 Information sources and communication . 6 Information and statistical systems . .24 7 The NCG’s main tasks for 2007 . 6 The national coordinator’s recommendations . .26 7 Institutional structure of the changeover preparations . .27 Part II Specification of Tasks in Individual Sectors 1 Introduction . .31 National Euro Changeover Plan 2 for the Czech republic 2007 2 Banks and other financial sector institutions . .31 1 The cash changeover . 1 Delivery of euro banknotes . 2 Production and delivery of euro coins . 3 Frontloading of banks and non-financial corporations . .32 4 Loading and conversion of ATMs . 5 Exchange of banknotes and coins, dual circulation and withdrawal of national currency banknotes and coins . .33 6 Cash transport, storage and protection . 7 Destruction of Czech banknotes and coins withdrawn from circulation . 8 Communication with professionals and the public on changeover issues, exchange of banknotes and coins withdrawn from circulation . .34 2 The changeover for non-cash transactions . 1 CNB membership of TARGET, modification of CERTIS . 2 Conversion of accounts, payment cards and other payment instruments . .35 3 Financial sector institutions and the euro, information systems, consumer protection in the financial sector . .36 1 Conversion of securities and other financial market products . 2 Adjustment of market operators and settlement systems, adjustment of market indices Securities trading . 3 Conversion of information technology . .37 4 Overview of consumer protection-related measures, revaluation of securities . 4 Overview of necessary legislative changes . .38 1 Implementation of changes to Czech law so that the Czech Republic meets the conditions for adopting the euro . 2 Legislative measures for euro adoption itselfa . 5 Conclusions, summary, main recommendations . .39 6 Indicative timetable of changeover-related tasks in the financial sector . .40 3 Public finances and central and local government . .44 1 The state budget, local authority budgets and state funds . 1 Relationship to social security and public health insurance . .45 2 Administration of government debt and state financial assets . 3 Accounting, reporting, taxes, duties, wages and salaries . 1 Accounting . 2 Taxes . .46 3 Duties . 4 Judicial and administrative fees . 5 Local charges . .47 6 Wages and salaries . 4 Prices . 5 Social security and public health insurance . 1 Pension insurance . 2 Sickness insurance . .48 3 Public health insurance . 6 Conversion of information systems . .49 7 The legislative aspect of the changeover in public administration . 4 The non-financial sector and consumer protection . .50 1 Price conversion and the dual display of prices . 2 Dual circulation . .51 Content 3 Ethics of the changeover . .51 4 Price monitoring, inspection work, dispute resolution . .52 5 Main corporate aspects of the changeover . .53 1 The capacity aspect . .54 2 The need to invest in adjusting business reporting, computer systems, data-processing software/hardware and staff training 3 The aspect of financial management, planning and accounting . 4 The frontloading aspect . .55 5 The aspect of redefining a company’s market position in the medium and long run . .56 5 Legislative requirements for the changeover . 1 Characteristics of changeover-related tasks . 1 Preparation of the General Act . 2 Preparation of the new act on the Czech National Bank . .57 3 Preparation of the timetable for legislative work . .58 1 Method of division of legal regulations into groups . .59 2 Recommendations for sponsors of individual bills . 3 Identification of regional and local government legal acts . .60 4 Schedule for legislative work associated with the changeover . .61 1 Preparation of the General Act . 2 Preparation of the new Act on the CNB . 3 Preparation of the Timetable for Legislative Work Associated with the Changeover . 6 Information sources and communication . .62 1 Objectives of the changeover information campaign . 2 System and principles of communication . 3 Institutional arrangements . ..
Recommended publications
  • The Scandinavian Argument for Multi-Level Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)
    Running head: THE SCANDINAVIAN ARGUMENT FOR MULTI-LEVEL EMU Looking North: The Scandinavian Argument for Multi-Level Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) Malcolm Thomson University of Victoria Paper Submitted for the “Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union” Scripps College, Claremont, California April 5-6, 2018 THE SCANDINAVIAN ARGUMENT FOR MULTI-LEVEL EMU 1 The European Union (EU) is undergoing a significant period in its existence marked by various crises at both member state and supranational levels. While previous literature has stated, “it is difficult to remember a time when the EU or its predecessors were not facing a crisis of one sort or another” (Hodson & Puetter, 2016, p. 365), it can be argued that the various crises that the European Union has faced over the past fifteen years have shifted the collectively-held conception of an integrated and cooperative European Union into a splintered and divided institution. The global financial crisis, the subsequent sovereign debt crisis, and the migrant crisis are causing member states to re-evaluate their position within the EU (Verdun, 2016). This re- evaluation is taking form in multiple iterations and at various levels of intensities, and is forcing the EU to look at ways in which it can adapt and evolve in order better accommodate the quickly changing needs of the elements that compose it. One of the most visible occurrences of this evolution in European integration is seen within the EU’s Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). EMU played a large role in the sovereign debt crisis, as its “incomplete” structure not only helped to create the crisis, but also prevented quicker action from being taken in order to help those most affected (Verdun, 2016, p.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBOR Transition Faqs ‘Big Bang’ CCP Switch Over
    RED = Final File Size/Bleed Line BLACK = Page Size/Trim Line MAGENTA = Margin/Safe Art Boundary NOT A PRODUCT OF BARCLAYS RESEARCH LIBOR Transition FAQs ‘Big bang’ CCP switch over 1. When will CCPs switch their rates for discounting 2. €STR Switch Over to new risk-free rates (RFRs)? What is the ‘big bang’ 2a. What are the mechanics for the cash adjustment switch over? exchange? Why is this necessary? As part of global industry efforts around benchmark reform, Each CCP will perform a valuation using EONIA and then run most systemic Central Clearing Counterparties (CCPs) are the same valuation by switching to €STR. The switch to €STR expected to switch Price Aligned Interest (PAI) and discounting discounting will lead to a change in the net present value of EUR on all cleared EUR-denominated products to €STR in July 2020, denominated trades across all CCPs. As a result, a mandatory and for USD-denominated derivatives to SOFR in October 2020. cash compensation mechanism will be used by the CCPs to 1a. €STR switch over: weekend of 25/26 July 2020 counter this change in value so that individual participants will experience almost no ‘net’ changes, implemented through a one As the momentum of benchmark interest rate reform continues off payment. This requirement is due to the fact portfolios are in Europe, while EURIBOR has no clear end date, the publishing switching from EONIA to €STR flat (no spread), however there of EONIA will be discontinued from 3 January 2022. Its is a fixed spread between EONIA and €STR (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission Cover Sheet
    SUBMISSION COVER SHEET Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional) LCH Date: March 16, 2012 IMPORTANT : CHECK BOX IF CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT IS REQUESTED. ORGANIZATION LCH.Clearnet Limited FILING AS A: DCM SEF DCO SDR ECM/SPDC TYPE OF FILING Rules and Rule Amendments Certification under § 40.6 (a) or § 41.24 (a) “Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” under § 40.4 (b)(5) Notification under § 40.6 (d) Request for Approval under § 40.4 (a) or § 40.5 (a) Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change under § 40.10 (a) Products Certification under § 39.5(b), § 40.2 (a), or § 41.23 (a) Swap Class Certification under § 40.2 (d) Request for Approval under § 40.3 (a) Novel Derivative Product Notification under § 40.12 (a) RULE NUMBERS Amended General Regulations, Schedule to the SwapClear Regulations, Part B and Schedule A, Part B to the FCM Regulations DESCRIPTION Introduction of the extension of the eligible maturity of Japanese yen interest rate swaps from 30 years to 40 years. Additionally, the introduction of the extension of the eligible maturity of Overnight Index Swaps from denominated in USD, EUR and GBP to 30 years. There are consequential amendments to General Regulations, Schedule to the SwapClear Regulations, Part B and Schedule A, Part B to the FCM Regulations. LCH.Clearnet Rule Submission SUBMISSION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CLEARINGHOUSE RULES TO THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION SUBMITTED BY LCH.Clearnet Limited an English limited company FILING AS A REGISTERED DERIVATIVES CLEARING ORGANIZATION Pursuant to Commission Regulation § 40.6
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 260, June 2020
    260 Year XXVI • June 2020 BULLETIN 260 PUBLISHER Croatian National Bank Publications Department Trg hrvatskih velikana 3, 10000 Zagreb Phone: +385 1 45 64 555 Contact phone: +385 1 45 65 006 Fax: +385 1 45 64 687 www.hnb.hr Release dates are disseminated on the advance release calendar posted for Croatia on the IMF’s DSBB (http://dsbb.imf.org). Those using data from this publication are requested to cite the source. ISSN 1334-0050 (online) BULLETIN 260 Zagreb, June 2020 General information on Croatia Economic indicators 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Area (square km) 56,594 56,594 56,594 56,594 56,594 56,594 56,594 56,594 56,594 56,594 56,594 Population (million)a 4.303 4.290 4.280 4.268 4.256 4.238 4.204 4.174 4.125 4.089 4.067 GDP (million HRK, current prices)b 330,771 328,824 333,215 330,509 331,209 331,343 339,696 351,169 366,426 382,965 400,102 GDP (million EUR, current prices) 45,067 45,130 44,822 43,966 43,732 43,426 44,640 46,640 49,118 51,654 53,969 GDP per capita (in EUR) 10,474 10,520 10,472 10,301 10,275 10,247 10,619 11,174 11,907 12,632 13,270 GDP – real year-on-year rate of growth –7.4 –1.5 –0.3 –2.2 –0.5 –0.1 2.4 3.5 3.1 2.7 2.9 (in %) Average year-on-year CPI inflation rate 2.4 1.1 2.3 3.4 2.2 –0.2 –0.5 –1.1 1.1 1.5 0.8 Current account balance (million EUR)c –2,959 –974 –799 –789 –461 111 1,452 994 1,679 982 1,571 Current account balance (as % of GDP) –6.6 –2.2 –1.8 –1.8 –1.1 0.3 3.3 2.1 3.4 1.9 2.9 Exports of goods and services 32.7 36.2 38.9 39.6 40.5 43.3 46.4 47.7 50.1 50.5 52.1 (as % of GDP)
    [Show full text]
  • Replacing the LIBOR with a Transparent and Reliable Index of Interbank Borrowing: Comments on the Wheatley Review of LIBOR Initial Discussion Paper
    Replacing the LIBOR with a Transparent and Reliable Index of Interbank Borrowing: Comments on the Wheatley Review of LIBOR Initial Discussion Paper 6 September 2012 * Rosa M. Abrantes-Metz and David S. Evans *Abrantes-Metz is Adjunct Associate Professor at the Stern School of Business, New York University and a Principal of Global Economics Group; Evans is Executive Director of the Jevons Institute for Competition Law and Economics and Visiting Professor at the University College London, Lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, and Chairman, Global Economics Group. The authors thank John H. Cochrane, Albert D. Metz, Richard Schmalensee, and Brian Smith for helpful insights. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to affiliated institutions or their clients. 1 I. Summary 1. The Wheatley Review released its Initial Discussion Paper (the “Discussion Paper”) on August 10, 2012 and has sought comments on its preliminary findings and recommendations on how to reform the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”).1 2. This submission presents an alternative to the LIBOR that would in our view: a. Eliminate or significantly reduce the severe defects in the LIBOR which lead the Discussion Paper to conclude that continuing with the current system is “not a viable option;”2 b. Provide a transparent and reliable measure of interbank lending rates during normal times as well as financial crises; c. Minimize disruptions to the market; and, d. Provide parties relying on the LIBOR with a standard that would maintain continuity with the LIBOR. 3. This alternative, which we call the “Committed” LIBOR (CLIBOR), would: a.
    [Show full text]
  • EONIA Benchmark Statement
    European Money Markets Institute EONIA Benchmark Statement Document Information Document Title: EONIA Benchmark Statement Status: FINAL Business Area: Benchmarks Governance Date: 18th December 2019 EMMI Reference No. D00429A-2019 Sensitivity: Public Document EONIA Benchmark Statement v.1 1 European Money Markets Institute Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 3 2. GENERAL INFORMATION .................................................................................................................. 4 3. MARKET OR ECONOMIC REALITY ..................................................................................................... 5 4. INPUT DATA AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................... 6 5. EXERCISE OF JUDGEMENT OR DISCRETION BY THE ADMINISTRATOR OR CONTRIBUTORS ............. 8 6. CESSATION AND CHANGE OF THE METHODOLOGY ......................................................................... 9 7. POTENTIAL LIMITATIONS OF THE BENCHMARK .............................................................................11 8. SPECIFIC DISCLOSURES FOR INTEREST RATE AND CRITICAL BENCHMARKS ...................................13 ANNEX 1: KEY TERMS .........................................................................................................................15 ANNEX 2: REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ..................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • 2021: a Defining Moment for the Interest Rates Reform City Week 2020 – London
    21 September 2020 ESMA80-187-627 2021: A Defining Moment for The Interest Rates Reform City Week 2020 – London Steven Maijoor Chair European Securities and Markets Authority Introduction Good morning Ladies and Gentlemen, It is my great pleasure to participate today in the City Week 2020 forum. The interest rates reform is one of the key challenges that the global financial system is currently facing. Therefore, I would like to thank City & Financial Global and the other institutions involved in the organisation of this forum for inviting me and for including in the agenda a panel discussion on this very important matter. Today, before participating in the panel discussion, I would like to speak about recent and expected developments of the global interest rates reform and the crucial role that the cooperation between public authorities and the financial industry is playing in this process. €STR: the new risk-free rate for the euro area As Chair of a European Authority, please allow me to start with an overview of interest rates transition in the euro area and the challenges that lie ahead of us. ESMA • 201-203 rue de Bercy • CS 80910 • 75589 Paris Cedex 12 • France • Tel. +33 (0) 1 58 36 43 21 • www.esma.europa.eu We are soon approaching the first-year anniversary of the Euro Short-Term Rate, or €STR1, which has been published by the ECB since 2nd October 2019. This rate is arguably the core element of the interest rate reform in the euro area, and I will try to explain why this is the case.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Issuing Activity and Currency Circulation
    CHAPTER 3 3 ISSUING ACTIVITY AND CURRENCY CIRCULATION 3.1 CUMULATIVE NET ISSUANCE Euro banknotes accounted for almost the en- tire value of the CNI (98.5%), but only for 19% of The cumulative net issuance (CNI)10 of euro the CNI in terms of volume. Euro coins (includ- banknotes and coins in Slovakia had a total ing euro collector coins) made up the remaining value of €11.02 billion as at 31 December 2016, 81%. with euro banknotes accounting for €10.9 billion of that amount. The CNI increased in The cumulative net issuance as at 31 Decem- 2016 by 7.9% year on year (by €807.2 million), ber 2016 comprised almost 157.2 million euro which represented a slight acceleration com- banknotes and approximately 654 million euro pared with the previous year. The value of the coins, including collector coins. For the first item currency in circulation, corresponding to time, the €100 denomination had the largest Národná banka Slovenska’s allocated share in share of the total number of banknotes includ- the Eurosystem’s production of euro banknotes ed in the CNI, at 24%. The €50 denomination, (Banknote Allocation Key), amounted to around which had held that position in all the previ- €11.4 billion as at 31 December 2016.11 The dif- ous years following Slovakia’s adoption of the ference in value between the euro banknotes euro, saw its share drop to 23%. The coins is- issued in Slovakia and the currency in circulation sued in the highest volumes are the two low- item was €515 million.
    [Show full text]
  • 235 Million 917 Million Euro Banknotes in Euro Coins in the Bank’S Cumula- Slovakia’S Cumulative Tive Net Issuance Net Issuance
    B Issuing activity 4 and cash circulation more than more than 235 million 917 million euro banknotes in euro coins in the Bank’s cumula- Slovakia’s cumulative tive net issuance net issuance almost 231 million 177 million banknotes euro coins processed processed by NBS by the Bank 6 17,523 precious metal counterfeit euro collector coins banknotes and issued coins recovered by the Bank in Slovakia 73 B Issuing activity 4 and cash circulation 2020 saw a year-on-year increase in euro cash issuance growth and a rise in the number of counterfeit banknotes and coins withdrawn from circulation in Slovakia 4.1 Cumulative net issuance developments Euro cash issuance growth was higher in 2020 than in the previous year In 2020 cash circulation in Slovakia was affected by the COVID-19 pan- demic crisis, which when it broke out in March triggered a brief surge in euro cash issuance. Immediately after Slovakia reported its first case of COVID-19, it saw increasing demand for euro banknotes, mainly for the €200 and €100 denominations. As a result, the cumulative net issuance (CNI)12 of euro in Slovakia increased by €0.8 billion during March. In sub- sequent months, the CNI maintained a steady trend. Once the cash started to be returned from circulation to Národná banka Slovenska, cash circula- tion stabilised. Despite a year-on-year reduction in the volume of the cash cycle (the volume of cash issued and returned from circulation), the value of the CNI of euro in Slovakia in 2020 represented a year-on-year increase of 13.2% (€1.96 billion).
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Economic Outlook on Thin Ice
    ECONOMIC & STRATEGY RESEARCH 04 February 2019 Quarterly report Extract from a report Czech Economic Outlook On thin ice © iStock Czech economy set to continue on a sustainable growth path While strong investment drove growth in 2018, we expect much more balanced growth supported by domestic and external demand this year. We expect tension on the labour market to persist, creating more inflationary pressure, keeping inflation above the CNB’s 2% target. CNB to gear down rate hikes We believe the CNB will take a breather from hiking at the beginning of the year, owing to global uncertainty, but we expect two hikes over the year. Koruna set to appreciate gradually Ongoing excess CZK liquidity likely will impede the koruna’s appreciation, especially given external economic weakness and other looming risks. We expect the CZK to reach EUR/CZK25.20 towards end-2019. Yield curve to stay inverted in near future We see only limited potential for an increase in CZK IRS, with the short end supported by CNB hikes in 2019. In 2020, rates are expected to come under pressure again on the back of a global slowdown. Jan Vejmělek Viktor Zeisel Jakub Matějů Jana Steckerová (420) 222 008 568 (420) 222 008 523 (420) 222 008 524 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Please see back page for important disclaimer Date and time of the compilation: 4 February 2019, 7:37 AM Economic & Strategy Research Czech Economic Outlook Let’s cross that bridge when we come to it Jan Vejmělek Investors will not exactly remember 2018 as a good year because they had difficulty finding (420) 222 008 568 jan [email protected] assets that could offer a positive full year performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Major Interest Rate Benchmarks: Progress Report
    Reforming major interest rate benchmarks Progress report 14 November 2018 The Financial Stability Board (FSB) is established to coordinate at the international level the work of national financial authorities and international standard-setting bodies in order to develop and promote the implementation of effective regulatory, supervisory and other financial sector policies. Its mandate is set out in the FSB Charter, which governs the policymaking and related activities of the FSB. These activities, including any decisions reached in their context, shall not be binding or give rise to any legal rights or obligations under the FSB’s Articles of Association. Contacting the Financial Stability Board Sign up for e-mail alerts: www.fsb.org/emailalert Follow the FSB on Twitter: @FinStbBoard E-mail the FSB at: [email protected] Copyright © 2018 Financial Stability Board. Please refer to: http://www.fsb.org/terms_conditions/ ii Contents Page Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 1. International coordination and key cross-jurisdictional themes ........................... 3 1.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Issues related to divergence between IBORs ............................................................... 4 1.3 Approach to
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study of Czech and Slovak Koruna
    International Journal of Economic Sciences Vol. VI, No. 2 / 2017 DOI: 10.20472/ES.2017.6.2.002 BRIEF HISTORY OF CURRENCY SEPARATION – CASE STUDY OF CZECH AND SLOVAK KORUNA KLARA CERMAKOVA Abstract: This paper aims at describing the process of currency separation of Czech and Slovak koruna and its economic and political background, highlights some of its unique features which ensured smooth currency separation, avoided speculation and enabled preservation of the policy of a stable exchange rate and increased confidence in the new monetary systems. This currency separation was higly appreciated and its scenario and legislative background were reccommended by the IMF for use in other countries. The paper aims also to draw conclusions on performance of selected macroeconomic variables of the two successor countries with impact on monetary policy and exchange rates of successor currencies. Keywords: currency separation, exchange rate, monetary policy, economic performance, inflation, payment system, central bank JEL Classification: E44, E50, E52 Authors: KLARA CERMAKOVA, University of Economics in Prague, Czech Republic, Email: [email protected] Citation: KLARA CERMAKOVA (2017). Brief History of Currency Separation – Case study of Czech and Slovak Koruna. International Journal of Economic Sciences, Vol. VI(2), pp. 30-44., 10.20472/ES.2017.6.2.002 Copyright © 2017, KLARA CERMAKOVA, [email protected] 30 International Journal of Economic Sciences Vol. VI, No. 2 / 2017 1. Introduction Last decade of 20th century was an important period either from political either from economic aspects. Developed market economies mainly in Western Europe and Northern America were on the margin of recession, and in most centrally planned economies the political regimes were collapsing, starting a period of crucial political changes, which resulted, in some cases, into separation of multinational federations and birth of new states.
    [Show full text]