DOCSLIB.ORG

Preservice Secondary School Mathematics Teachers' Current Notions of Proof in Euclidean Geometry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preservice Secondary School Mathematics Teachers' Current Notions of Proof in Euclidean Geometry University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2011 Preservice Secondary School Mathematics Teachers' Current Notions of Proof in Euclidean Geometry Michael Ratliff [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons Recommended Citation Ratliff, Michael, "Preservice Secondary School Mathematics Teachers' Current Notions of Proof in Euclidean Geometry. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2011. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1118 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Michael Ratliff entitled "Preservice Secondary School Mathematics Teachers' Current Notions of Proof in Euclidean Geometry." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Teacher Education. P. Mark Taylor, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Vena M. Long, JoAnn Cady, Jerzy Dydak Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Michael L. Ratliff entitled “Preservice Secondary School Mathematics Teachers‟ Current Notions of Proof in Euclidean Geometry.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Education. Dr. P. Mark Taylor, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Dr. Vena M. Long Dr. JoAnn Cady Dr. Jerzy Dydak Accepted for the Council: Dr. Carolyn R. Hodges, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) Preservice Secondary School Mathematics Teachers‟ Current Notions of Proof in Euclidean Geometry A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Michael L. Ratliff August 2011 Copyright © by Michael L. Ratliff All rights reserved. ii Acknowledgements There are many people who are responsible for my education, and I express gratitude to all of them. I could not have completed this degree without the instruction, guidance, encouragement, and support provided by these people. There are a few from this group that I want to acknowledge who are most responsible for the completion of this degree. I want to thank the ACCLAIM Management Team for their belief in me and support, especially Dr. Vena Long, Dr. Bill Bush, Dr. Mike Mays, Dr. Carl Lee, and Dr. Robert Mayes. This opportunity has forever changed my professional life. Also, I want to thank my dissertation committee: Dr. P. Mark Taylor (chair), Dr. Vena Long, Dr. JoAnn Cady, and Dr. Jerzy Dydak. I appreciate the guidance and also patience that each of you demonstrated as I completed this work. In addition, I want to thank a few people from my home institution, Lindsey Wilson College: Dr. Bill Luckey, Dr. William Julian, Dr. Bettie Starr, and my Division colleagues. I could not have finished without the support and encouragement that all of you provided. I‟m thankful for the many life-long friendships that I now have with those from my cohort and the other two cohorts. I hope that all of you achieve your professional and personal goals in life, and I thank all of you for the support and encouragement offered along our doctoral paths. I want to thank my family for their support and encouragement. And, I want to thank my very good friend, Faylene, for your support and encouragement this past year. Lastly, this dissertation is dedicated to my parents, William S. and Katherine L. Ratliff. Thank you for everything (and I think I‟m finished with school now). iii Abstract Much research has been conducted in the past 25 years related to the teaching and learning of proof in Euclidean geometry. However, very little research has been done focused on preservice secondary school mathematics teachers‟ notions of proof in Euclidean geometry. Thus, this qualitative study was exploratory in nature, consisting of four case studies focused on identifying preservice secondary school mathematics teachers‟ current notions of proof in Euclidean geometry, a starting point for improving the teaching and learning of proof in Euclidean geometry. The unit of analysis (i.e., participant) in each case study was a preservice mathematics teacher. The case studies were parallel as each participant was presented with the same Euclidean geometry content in independent interview sessions. The content consisted of six Euclidean geometry statements and a Euclidean geometry problem appropriate for a secondary school Euclidean geometry course. For five of the six Euclidean geometry statements, three justifications for each statement were presented for discussion. For the sixth Euclidean geometry statement and the Euclidean geometry problem, participants constructed justifications for discussion. A case record for each case study was constructed from an analysis of data generated from interview sessions, including anecdotal notes from the playback of the recorded interviews, the review of the interview transcripts, document analyses of both previous geometry course documents and any documents generated by participants via assigned Euclidean geometry tasks, and participant emails. After the four case records were completed, a cross-case analysis was conducted to identify themes that traverse the individual cases. iv From the analyses, participants‟ current notions of proof in Euclidean geometry were somewhat diverse, yet suggested that an integration of justifications consisting of empirical and deductive evidence for Euclidean geometry statements could improve both the teaching and learning of Euclidean geometry. v Table of Contents Chapter 1 : INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1 Background of the Study ............................................................................................................ 1 United States Schools, Geometry and Proof ........................................................................... 1 Learned Societies, Organizations, Committees and Proof.................................................... 12 The Researcher‟s Interest and Motivation ............................................................................ 14 Statement of Problem ................................................................................................................ 15 The Research Questions ............................................................................................................ 16 Delimitations and Limitations ................................................................................................... 17 Chapter 2 : REVIEW OF LITERATURE .................................................................................... 19 Defining Proof .......................................................................................................................... 19 Proof Schemes .......................................................................................................................... 21 External Conviction Proof Schemes ..................................................................................... 22 Empirical Proof Schemes ...................................................................................................... 23 Deductive Proof Schemes ..................................................................................................... 23 Functions of Proof..................................................................................................................... 23 Pedagogical Approaches ........................................................................................................... 26 Recommendations and Standards ............................................................................................. 27 Proof and Dynamic Geometry Software ................................................................................... 28 Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 31 Chapter 3 : RESEARCH DESIGN ............................................................................................... 33 Rationale for Case Study .......................................................................................................... 33 Participants ................................................................................................................................ 34 Data Collection ......................................................................................................................... 34 Phase One.............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Specification
    Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations OCR FREE STANDING MATHEMATICS QUALIFICATION (ADVANCED): ADDITIONAL MATHEMATICS 6993 Key Features • replaces Additional Mathematics and Additional Mathematics (MEI); • developed jointly by OCR and MEI; • designed for students who will comfortably achieve Grade A at GCSE; • provides an excellent preparation for AS study for Year 11 students; • qualification at Level 3 attracting points on the UCAS tariff; • content consists of four strands of pure mathematics, each with an associated application providing tasters for A level Applied Mathematics; • single two hour examination and no coursework; • textbook in preparation, to be published by Hodder & Stoughton. Support and In-Service Training for Teachers To support teachers using this specification, OCR will make the following material and services available: • direct access to a mathematics subject team; • specimen question paper and mark scheme, available from the Publications Department (telephone 0870870 6622; fax: 0870 870 6621; e-mail: [email protected]); • a report on the examination, compiled by the senior examining personnel after each examination session; • OCR website(www.ocr.org.uk). This unit has been developed with the support of MEI. The Professional Officers of MEI are always ready and prepared to offer support, extra resource material and INSET training within Centres on request. For further information about MEI, see Section 10. © OCR 2002 Additional Mathematics QAN 100/2548/0 Oxford, Cambridge and RSA Examinations CONTENTS SECTION
    [Show full text]
  • IGCSE Additional Maths 0606 Y20-22
    Syllabus Cambridge IGCSE™ Additional Mathematics 0606 For examination in June and November 2020, 2021 and 2022. Also available for examination in March 2020, 2021 and 2022 for India only. Version 3 Why choose Cambridge? Cambridge Assessment International Education prepares school students for life, helping them develop an informed curiosity and a lasting passion for learning. We are part of the University of Cambridge. Our international qualifications are recognised by the world’s best universities and employers, giving students a wide range of options in their education and career. As a not-for-profit organisation, we devote our resources to delivering high-quality educational programmes that can unlock learners’ potential. Our programmes and qualifications set the global standard for international education. They are created by subject experts, rooted in academic rigour and reflect the latest educational research. They provide a strong platform for learners to progress from one stage to the next, and are well supported by teaching and learning resources. Our mission is to provide educational benefit through provision of international programmes and qualifications for school education and to be the world leader in this field. Together with schools, we develop Cambridge learners who are confident, responsible, reflective, innovative and engaged – equipped for success in the modern world. Every year, nearly a million Cambridge students from 10 000 schools in 160 countries prepare for their future with an international education from Cambridge International. ‘We think the Cambridge curriculum is superb preparation for university.’ Christoph Guttentag, Dean of Undergraduate Admissions, Duke University, USA Quality management Our systems for managing the provision of international qualifications and education programmes for students aged 5 to 19 are certified as meeting the internationally recognised standard for quality management, ISO 9001:2008.
    [Show full text]
  • O Level Additional Mathematics Nov 2017
    Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge Ordinary Level *3621984096* ADDITIONAL MATHEMATICS 4037/23 Paper 2 October/November 2017 2 hours Candidates answer on the Question Paper. No Additional Materials are required. READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS FIRST Write your Centre number, candidate number and name on all the work you hand in. Write in dark blue or black pen. You may use an HB pencil for any diagrams or graphs. Do not use staples, paper clips, glue or correction fluid. DO NOT WRITE IN ANY BARCODES. Answer all the questions. Give non-exact numerical answers correct to 3 significant figures, or 1 decimal place in the case of angles in degrees, unless a different level of accuracy is specified in the question. The use of an electronic calculator is expected, where appropriate. You are reminded of the need for clear presentation in your answers. At the end of the examination, fasten all your work securely together. The number of marks is given in brackets [ ] at the end of each question or part question. The total number of marks for this paper is 80. This document consists of 16 printed pages. DC (KS) 155455 © UCLES 2017 [Turn over 2 Mathematical Formulae 1. ALGEBRA Quadratic Equation For the equation ax2 + bx + c = 0, −bb2 − 4ac x = 2a Binomial Theorem n n n n–1 n n–2 2 n n–r r n (a + b) = a + (1 )a b + ( 2 )a b + … + ( r )a b + … + b , n n! where n is a positive integer and = ( r ) (n – r)!r! 2. TRIGONOMETRY Identities sin2 A + cos2 A = 1 sec2 A = 1 + tan2 A cosec2 A = 1 + cot2 A Formulae for ∆ABC a b c sin A = sin B = sin C a2 = b2 + c2 – 2bc cos A 1 ∆ = bc sin A 2 © UCLES 2017 4037/23/O/N/17 3 1 (a) On each of the diagrams below, shade the region which represents the given set.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Mathematics 0606/01
    UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS International General Certificate of Secondary Education ADDITIONAL MATHEMATICS 0606/01 Paper 1 May/June 2004 2 hours Additional Materials: Answer Booklet/Paper Electronic calculator Graph paper (3 sheets) Mathematical tables READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS FIRST If you have been given an Answer Booklet, follow the instructions on the front cover of the Booklet. Write your Centre number, candidate number and name on all the work you hand in. Write in dark blue or black pen on both sides of the paper. You may use a soft pencil for any diagrams or graphs. Do not use staples, paper clips, highlighters, glue or correction fluid. Answer all the questions. Write your answers on the separate Answer Booklet/Paper provided. Give non-exact numerical answers correct to 3 significant figures, or 1 decimal place in the case of angles in degrees, unless a different level of accuracy is specified in the question. At the end of the examination, fasten all your work securely together. The number of marks is given in brackets [ ] at the end of each question or part question. The total number of marks for this paper is 80. The use of an electronic calculator is expected, where appropriate. You are reminded of the need for clear presentation in your answers. This document consists of 5 printed pages and 3 blank pages. MCS UCJ106 S61381/1 © UCLES 2004 [Turn over www.theallpapers.com 2 Mathematical Formulae 1. ALGEBRA Quadratic Equation For the equation ax2 + bx + c = 0, –b ± √b2 – 4ac x = ––––––––––––––. 2a Binomial Theorem n n n (a + b)n = an + an – 1b + an – 2b2 + … + an – rbr + … + bn, ()1 ()2 ()r n n! where n is a positive integer and = –––––––– .
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Academic Standards Mathematics
    Kentucky Academic Standards for Mathematics: Conceptual Category Functions Functions Overview Interpreting Functions Building Functions Linear, Quadratic and Trigonometric Functions Exponential Models • Understand the concept of a • Build a function that models a • Construct and compare linear, • Extend the domain of function and use function relationship between two quadratic and exponential trigonometric functions using notation. quantities. models and solve problems. the unit circle. • Interpret functions that arise • Build new functions from • Interpret expressions for • Model periodic phenomena in applications in terms of the existing functions. functions in terms of the with trigonometric functions. context. situation they model. • Prove and apply trigonometric • Analyze functions using identities. different representations. Modeling Standards: Modeling is best interpreted not as a collection of isolated topics but rather in relation to other standards. Making mathematical models is a Standard for Mathematical Practice and specific modeling standards appear throughout the high school standards indicated by a star symbol (★). The star symbol sometimes appears on the heading for a group of standards; in that case, it should be understood to apply to all standards in that group. Plus (+) Standards: Additional mathematics concepts students should learn in order to take advanced courses such as calculus, advanced statistics or discrete mathematics are indicated by (+) symbol. 194 Functions-Interpreting Functions Standards for Mathematical Practice MP.1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. MP.5. Use appropriate tools strategically. MP.2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. MP.6. Attend to precision. MP.3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. MP.7. Look for and make use of structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Core State Standards for Mathematics
    Common Core State StandardS Grade 10 Mathematics Testing in Washington This document highlights, in yellow, the mathematical practices and high school content standards, clusters, and domains included for 10th grade testing starting in spring 2018. Students should receive instruction toward the entirety of the high school standards, not just the tested standards, throughout their high school experience. Further information about 10th grade testing is available in the Grade 10 Mathematics and ELA Testing and Content document and the Grade 10 Mathematics Testing: Further Focus document. Common Core State StandardS for matHematICS mathematics | Standards for mathematical Practice The Standards for Mathematical Practice describe varieties of expertise that mathematics educators at all levels should seek to develop in their students. These practices rest on important “processes and proficiencies” with longstanding importance in mathematics education. The first of these are the NCTM process standards of problem solving, reasoning and proof, communication, representation, and connections. The second are the strands of mathematical proficiency specified in the National Research Council’s report Adding It Up: adaptive reasoning, strategic competence, conceptual understanding (comprehension of mathematical concepts, operations and relations), procedural fluency (skill in carrying out procedures flexibly, accurately, efficiently and appropriately), and productive disposition (habitual inclination to see mathematics as sensible, useful, and worthwhile, coupled with a belief in diligence and one’s own efficacy). 1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. Mathematically proficient students start by explaining to themselves the meaning of a problem and looking for entry points to its solution. They analyze givens, constraints, relationships, and goals. They make conjectures about the form and meaning of the solution and plan a solution pathway rather than simply jumping into a solution attempt.
    [Show full text]
  • Syllabus Cambridge IGCSE Additional Mathematics (US) 0459
    Syllabus Cambridge IGCSE™ Additional Mathematics (US) 0459 For examination in June and November 2020 and 2021. This syllabus is available only to schools in Arizona in the USA. Version 1 Why Choose Cambridge? Cambridge Assessment International Education prepares school students for life, helping them develop an informed curiosity and a lasting passion for learning. We are part of the University of Cambridge. Our international qualifications are recognized by the world’s best universities and employers, giving students a wide range of options in their education and career. As a not-for-profit organization, we devote our resources to delivering high-quality educational programs that can unlock learners’ potential. Our programs and qualifications set the global standard for international education. They are created by subject experts, rooted in academic rigor, and reflect the latest educational research. They provide a strong platform for learners to progress from one stage to the next, and are well supported by teaching and learning resources. Our mission is to provide educational benefit through provision of international programs and qualifications for school education and to be the world leader in this field. Together with schools, we develop Cambridge learners who are confident, responsible, reflective, innovative, and engaged – equipped for success in the modern world. Every year, nearly a million Cambridge students from 10 000 schools in 160 countries prepare for their future with an international education from Cambridge International. “We think the Cambridge curriculum is superb preparation for university.” Christoph Guttentag, Dean of Undergraduate Admissions, Duke University, USA Quality management Cambridge International is committed to providing exceptional quality.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Additional Mathematics
    ADDITIONAL MATHEMATICS SYLLABUSES Secondary Three to Four Express Course Normal (Academic) Course Implementation starting with 2020 Secondary Three Cohort © 2019 Curriculum Planning and Development Division. This publication is not for sale. Permission is granted to reproduce this publication in its entirety for personal or non-commercial educational use only. All other rights reserved. CONTENT Section 1: Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 Importance of Learning Mathematics ................................................................................ 2 Secondary Mathematics Curriculum ................................................................................... 2 Key Emphases ..................................................................................................................... 3 Section 2: Mathematics Curriculum .................................................................................. 4 Nature of Mathematics ....................................................................................................... 5 Themes and Big Ideas ......................................................................................................... 5 Mathematics Curriculum Framework ................................................................................. 9 21st Century Competencies .............................................................................................. 11 Section 3: O-Level Additional Mathematics Syllabus
    [Show full text]
  • K-12 Standards, Mathematics
    RIGOR • RELEVANCE • RELATIONSHIPS • RIGOR • RELEVANCE • RELATIONSHIPS • RIGOR •RELEVANCE • RELATIONSHIPS • RIGOR • RELEVANCE • RELATIONHIPS • RIGOR • RELEVAN RELATIONHIPS • RIGOR • RELEVANCE • RELATIONHIPS • RIGOR • RELEVANCE • RELATION •RIGOR • • RELEVANCE • RELATIONSHIPS • RIGOR • RELEVANCE • RELATIONSHIPS • RIGOR RELEVANCE • RELATIONSHIPS • RIGOR • RELEVANCE • RELATIONHIPS • RIGOR • RELEVAN Michigan K-12 Standards Mathematics Michigan State Board of Education Kathleen N. Straus, President Bloomfield Township John C. Austin, Vice President Ann Arbor Carolyn L. Curtin, Secretary Evart Marianne Yared McGuire, Treasurer Detroit Nancy Danhof, NASBE Delegate East Lansing Elizabeth W. Bauer Birmingham Daniel Varner Detroit Casandra E. Ulbrich Rochester Hills Governor Jennifer M. Granholm Ex Officio Michael P. Flanagan, Chairman Superintendent of Public Instruction Ex Officio MDE Staff Sally Vaughn, Ph.D. Deputy Superintendent and Chief Academic Officer Linda Forward, Director Office of Education Improvement and Innovation Welcome Welcome to the Michigan K-12 Standards for Mathematics, adopted by the State Board of Education in 2010. With the reauthorization of the 2001 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), commonly known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB), Michigan embarked on a standards revision process, starting with the K-8 mathematics and ELA standards that resulted in the Grade Level Content Expectations (GLCE). These were intended to lay the framework for the grade level testing in these subject areas required under NCLB. These were followed by GLCE for science and social studies, and by High School Content Expectations (HSCE) for all subject areas. Seven years later the revision cycle continued with Michigan working with other states to build on and refine current state standards that would allow states to work collaboratively to develop a repository of quality resources based on a common set of standards.
    [Show full text]
  • O-Level Additional Mathematics Syllabus Assumes Knowledge of O-Level Mathematics
    Additional Mathematics Singapore-Cambridge General Certificate of Education Ordinary Level (2021) (Syllabus 4047) CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 2 AIMS 2 ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES 2 SCHEME OF ASSESSMENT 3 USE OF CALCULATORS 3 SUBJECT CONTENT 4 MATHEMATICAL FORMULAE 7 MATHEMATICAL NOTATION 8 The Common Last Topics highlighted in yellow will not be examined in 2021 O-Level national examination. Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board MOE & UCLES 2019 1 4047 ADDITIONAL MATHEMATICS GCE ORDINARY LEVEL SYLLABUS (2021) INTRODUCTION The syllabus prepares students adequately for A-Level H2 Mathematics, where a strong foundation in algebraic manipulation skills and mathematical reasoning skills are required. The content is organised into three strands, namely, Algebra, Geometry and Trigonometry, and Calculus. Besides conceptual understanding and skill proficiency explicated in the content strand, the development of process skills, namely, reasoning, communication and connections, thinking skills and heuristics, and applications and modelling are also emphasised. The O-Level Additional Mathematics syllabus assumes knowledge of O-Level Mathematics. AIMS The O-Level Additional Mathematics syllabus aims to enable students who have an aptitude and interest in mathematics to: • acquire mathematical concepts and skills for higher studies in mathematics and to support learning in the other subjects, in particular, the sciences • develop thinking, reasoning and metacognitive skills through a mathematical approach to problem- solving • connect ideas within
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Mathematics Syllabus
    ZIMBABWE MINISTRY OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ADDITIONAL MATHEMATICS SYLLABUS FORMS 5 - 6 2015 - 2022 Curriculum Development and Technical Services P. O. Box MP 133 Mount Pleasant Harare © All Rrights Reserved 2015 Additional Mathematics Syllabus Forms 5 - 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education wishes to acknowledge the following for their valued contribution in the production of this syllabus: • National Mathematics panel • Zimbabwe School Examinations Council (ZIMSEC) • United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) • United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) • Representatives from Higher and Tertiary institutions i Additional Mathematics Syllabus Forms 5 - 6 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................i CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................ii 1.0 PREAMBLE ............................................................................................................................1 2.0 PRESENTATION OF SYLLABUS ..........................................................................................1 3.0 AIMS....................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 OBJECTIVES ..........................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics (MA) 1
    Mathematics (MA) 1 MA 135 Basic Statistics: 3 semester hours Mathematics (MA) This course is an introduction to the basics of probability as well as descriptive and inferential statistics. Topics include measures of central Courses tendency, measure of dispersion, histograms, the normal and binomial distributions, hypothesis testing, confidence intervals, chi-square MA 004 Beginning Algebra: 1 semester hour distribution, correlation, and prediction. Prerequisite: two years of high This course is designed to provide remedial work for those students school algebra, MA 006, or departmental approval. who enter college poorly prepared in mathematics. Class will focus on MA 139 Pre-Calculus: 4 semester hours basic computational skills, dimensional analysis, irrational numbers, Pre-Calculus is a collection of topics necessary for the successful scientific notation, interpretation of graphs, basic geometric concepts, completion of a year of calculus. Basically, a good knowledge of pre- and an introduction to basic algebra. Emphasis will be on problem calculus is a comfortable familiarity with the idea of function and with solving and reading for math. most of the basic functions, including polynomials, rational functions, MA 006 Intermediate Algebra II: 2 semester hours exponential, logarithmic and trigonometric functions. This comfortable The class covers the topics of intermediate algebra including familiarity allows one to solve equations and inequalities involving inequalities, linear equations, systems of linear equations, quadratic these various functions and to produce function rules from graphs or equations, exponents, ratio, proportion, variation, and graphing. graphs from function rules. Prerequisite: three years of high school Returning students who have not been in a math class for a number mathematics (including Algebra 2 and Geometry), an A- in MA 006, or of years might find this course a good choice in preparation for their the consent of the instructor.
    [Show full text]