DOCSLIB.ORG

FY2020 Draft Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FY2020 Draft Report [FULL COMMITTEE PRINT] 116TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 116–XXX ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2020 ll, 2019.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Ms.KAPTUR, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the following R E P O R T [To accompany H.R. ] The Committee on Appropriations submits the following report in explanation of the accompanying bill making appropriations for en- ergy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, and for other purposes. INDEX TO BILL AND REPORT Page Number Bill Report Introduction ................................................................................................ I. Department of Defense—Civil: Corps of Engineers—Civil .................................................................. Investigations ............................................................................... Construction ................................................................................. Mississippi River and Tributaries .............................................. Operation and Maintenance ....................................................... Regulatory Program ..................................................................... Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program ................... Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies .................................... Expenses ....................................................................................... Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) General Provisions .............................................................................. II. Department of the Interior: Central Utah Project ........................................................................... Central Utah Project Completion Account ................................ Bureau of Reclamation: Water and Related Resources ..................................................... Central Valley Project Restoration Fund ................................... California Bay-Delta Restoration ............................................... Policy and Administration .......................................................... 33–992 VerDate Sep 11 2014 23:46 May 15, 2019 Jkt 033992 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6659 E:\HR\OC\A992.XXX A992 2 Page Number Bill Report General Provisions .............................................................................. III. Department of Energy: Introduction ......................................................................................... Committee Recommendations ............................................................ Energy Programs: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy ................................. Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response ..... Electricity ..................................................................................... Nuclear Energy ............................................................................ Fossil Energy Research and Development ................................. Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves .................................. Strategic Petroleum Reserve ....................................................... SPR Petroleum Account .............................................................. Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve ........................................ Energy Information Administration ........................................... Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup ........................................ Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund .......................................................................................... Science .......................................................................................... Advanced Research Projects Agency—Energy ........................... Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program ...... Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program ................................... Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs ........................... Departmental Administration ..................................................... Office of the Inspector General ................................................... Atomic Energy Defense Activities: National Nuclear Security Administration: Weapons Activities ....................................................................... Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation .............................................. Naval Reactors ............................................................................. Federal Salaries and Expenses ................................................... Environmental and Other Defense Activities: Defense Environmental Cleanup ................................................ Other Defense Activities ............................................................. Power Marketing Administrations: Bonneville Power Administration ............................................... Southeastern Power Administration .......................................... Southwestern Power Administration ......................................... Western Area Power Administration ......................................... Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund .......... Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ........................................... Committee Recommendation .............................................................. General Provisions .............................................................................. IV. Independent Agencies: Appalachian Regional Commission ................................................... Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board ........................................... Delta Regional Authority ................................................................... Denali Commission ............................................................................. Northern Border Regional Commission ............................................ Southeast Crescent Regional Commission ........................................ Nuclear Regulatory Commission ....................................................... Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board ........................................... General Provisions .............................................................................. V. General Provisions House of Representatives Report Requirements ..................................... VerDate Sep 11 2014 23:46 May 15, 2019 Jkt 033992 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6659 E:\HR\OC\A992.XXX A992 3 SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Committee has considered budget estimates, which are con- tained in the Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2020. The following table summarizes appropriations for fiscal year 2019, the budget estimates, and amounts recommended in the bill for fiscal year 2020. VerDate Sep 11 2014 23:46 May 15, 2019 Jkt 033992 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\A992.XXX A992 4 VerDate Sep 11 2014 23:46 May 15, 2019 Jkt 033992 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\A992.XXX A992 Insert offset folio 01 here 33992A.001 5 INTRODUCTION The Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Ap- propriations bill for fiscal year 2020 totals $46,413,000,000, $1,773,000,000 above the amount appropriated in fiscal year 2019 and $8,490,703,000 above the budget request. Total defense fund- ing is $23,113,000,000, $673,000,000 above the amount appro- priated in fiscal year 2019 and $107,098,000 below the budget re- quest. Total non-defense funding is $23,300,000,000, $1,100,000,000 above the amount appropriated in fiscal year 2019 and $8,597,801,000 above the budget request. Title I of the bill provides $7,355,500,000 for the Civil Works pro- grams of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, $357,000,000 above fiscal year 2019 and $2,528,500,000 above the budget request. Total funding for activities eligible for reimbursement from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund is estimated at $1,697,000,000, which is an increase of $147,000,000 above fiscal year 2019 and $732,000,000 above the budget request. The bill makes use of all estimated annual revenues from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Title II provides $1,647,849,000 for the Department of the Inte- rior and the Bureau of Reclamation, $82,849,000 above fiscal year 2019 and $528,000,000 above the budget request. The Committee recommends $1,632,849,000 for the Bureau of Reclamation, $82,849,000 above fiscal year 2019 and $523,000,000 above the budget request. The Committee recommends $15,000,000 for the Central Utah Project, the same as fiscal year 2019 and $5,000,000 above the budget request. Title III provides $37,087,431,000 for the Department of Energy, $1,402,114,000 above fiscal year 2019 and $5,585,502,000 above the budget request. Funding for the National Nuclear Security Admin- istration (NNSA), which includes nuclear weapons activities, de- fense nuclear nonproliferation, naval reactors, and federal salaries and expenses, is $15,894,281,000, $665,663,000 above fiscal year 2019 and $590,719,000 below the budget request. Funding for energy programs within the Department of Energy, which includes basic science research and the applied energy pro- grams, is $14,198,415,000, $726,008,000 above fiscal year 2019 and $5,849,150,000 above the budget request. The Committee rec- ommends $6,870,000,000 for the Office of Science, $2,651,713,000
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Committee a Report
    117TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 117–98 ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2022 JULY 20, 2021.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Ms. KAPTUR, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the following R E P O R T together with MINORITY VIEWS [To accompany H.R. 4549] The Committee on Appropriations submits the following report in explanation of the accompanying bill making appropriations for en- ergy and water development for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2022, and for other purposes. INDEX TO BILL AND REPORT Page Number Bill Report Introduction ................................................................................................ ........ 6 I. Department of Defense—Civil: Corps of Engineers—Civil .................................................................. 2 11 Investigations ............................................................................... 2 18 Construction ................................................................................. 3 30 Mississippi River and Tributaries .............................................. 4 40 Operation and Maintenance ....................................................... 4 43 Regulatory Program ..................................................................... 6 71 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program ................... 6 72 Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies .................................... 6 72 Expenses ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Delta Development Plan for the Delta Regional Authority
    Arkansas’s Five-Year Delta Development Plan for the Delta Regional Authority 2009-2014 Mike Beebe, Governor Chris Masingill, Designee and Alternate February 2009 First Edition Special Thanks to the Members of Arkansas’s Five-Year Delta Development Plan Working Group Arkansas Economic Development Southeast Arkansas Economic Commission Development District Morris Jenkins Glenn Bell Kurt Naumann Southwest Arkansas Planning & Jean Noble Development District Delta Regional Authority Terry Sherwood Bill Triplett White River Planning & Delta Center for Economic Development, Development District Arkansas State University Van C. Thomas Alan McVey Office of Governor Mike Beebe Economic Research & Development Center, Christopher A. Masingill University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff Amanda M. Richardson Henry Golatt Office of Senator Blanche Lincoln Institute for Economic Advancement, Cydney Pierce University of Arkansas at Little Rock Donna Kay Yeargan Inderpreet (Sunny) Farmaham Tonya Hass Office of Senator Mark Pryor Susan Jackson Randy Massanelli Jim Youngquist Office of Congressman Vic Snyder Central Arkansas Planning & Dexter Pearson Development District Amanda White Rodney Larson Office of Congressman Marion Berry East Arkansas Planning & Erika Krennerich Development District Richard Spelic Office of Congressman Mike Ross Jeff Weaver Northwest Arkansas Economic Development District Office of Congressman John Boozman J. Mike Norton Stacey McClure STATE OF ARKANSAS MIKE BEEBE GOVERNOR February 13, 2009 Dear Economic Developer: Rural Arkansas and the Delta, in particular, are experiencing fundamental economic changes. The region has suffered for decades from extreme poverty, population migration, and an eroding economic base. Federal programs tend to be inflexible, and local communities are often unable to meet the requirements these programs entail. We are looking at deeply rooted problems that require high-level answers.
    [Show full text]
  • Tech World Series
    www.concordiasentinel.com Concordia Sentinel • November 6, 2019 • 5b Tech World Series se t RUSTON – The Louisiana take-all third game will be played Manny Garcia, Hunter Wells, Tech Bulldogs announced dates Saturday, Nov. 9 at 9 a.m. The Bryce Fagan, and Blake Johnson and times for the annual Fall contests are free and open to the will lead the Red Bulls while World Series, which will take public. Parker Bates, Kyle Griffen, Tyler place over the week of Nov. 6-9 The Red Bulls and Blue Dogs Follis, and Seth White will take at the Ruston High School base - will square off in three in - the reins for the Blue Dogs. ball field. trasquads, managed completely Shemar Page hit a two-run First pitch for the series is by the players. Players on both home run and eleven Bulldog scheduled for Wednesday, Nov. 6 teams were drafted by Tech's pitchers tossed scoreless innings at 4 p.m. with the second game eight seniors, who will manage as Louisiana Tech outscored Delta Charter running baCk tre griffin receives a handoff from quarterback following on Friday, Nov. 8 at 4 their two squads to close out a ULM 7-5 on Sunday's 15-inning Kavarius Whitehead Friday againts Cedar Creek. (Photo by Shanda Sharp) p.m. If necessary, the winner- competitive fall camp. fall scrimmage at Warhawk Field. -.. *!'*/$-$) .#%/$$'$-.,$. .$( *!-' ( +,$-#*!*)*,$ 0$'$ '*/$-$) %$*/%)"-"")""*&(%&(*/*%*)* . ,(-*!-' 8J?1$.#9<E<=@KF=8GGI8@J<D<EK ( *)"-""-*%+*&&()#$*%()%(%*( $%*%)())" &/#$*#*%)&*"*%**.%""*%($"" & )) .## ,$& -# ,$!! *$(#%$/%*+$*)**)$$%$-(($*/) /)$. ($--$--$++$)& 3'8:@8I:<P77777777777777777 )"(**)""))+*%*&+()(%(* <GLKP-?<I@== &(%&(*/ 0--/$.)/( , ;M<IK@J<)FM<D9<I ;M<IK@J<<:<D9<I '/-#3()% ))$)"- ,*2)) *1 )-% ))$)"- )*)' 777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 13) *1 )- $!++'$' 3*/(3)( )++,$- ,.*0'/ .# +,*+ ,.3 .# *0 +.$*) -/$.).*)*.$!3.# -# ,$!!*!3*/,+ *)$%*/&+"*%$)$%**%$**/%+((*)%( 1,$.*!1,$.*!- $4/, )-' +*$).( ).)*'.
    [Show full text]
  • In Our Most Recent Meeting of the Delta Regional Authority (Feb. 3-4), Pete
    INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: GOVERNOR RONNIE MUSGROVE FROM: ARMERITA TELL SUBJECT: DRA MEETING SUMMARY (FEBRUARY 2003) DATE: 2/6/2003 CC: BILL RENICK In our most recent meeting of the Delta Regional Authority (Feb. 3-4), Pete Johnson devoted the majority of time to a discussion of programs, policy, and administrative efforts that he would like to see centralized and operated by the Authority. Before that, however, Hayes Dent brought up several of Mississippi’s still pending proposals. Project Applications : There was a brief discussion of grants that were still “unapproved” and a sheet was passed out detailing that amount of unexpended funds for each state (attached). Mississippi has the most unexpended funds by over $1 million . One Mississippi project ( Delta State Business Retention Center , $255,000 DRA) was recommended by Hayes “and the DRA staff” for approval and was approved by the Authority by voice vote (no opposition). There were no apparent changes to the application and the DRA amount was the same as that originally suggested by us in August of last year. Hayes also indicated that the Bolivar County CAA proposal and the Town of Anguilla proposal were now fundable. There was no vote taken but Hayes indicated that approval ballots would be mailed to Alternates very soon. This type of action (especially when you consider the DRA’s own information regarding unallocated funds) only serves to support the notion that Pete and Hayes had unsupportable reasons for delaying and threatening these projects with disapproval. The Town of Moorhead , Quitman County Rural Transportation , and Seminary Public Library projects were not brought up for discussion by Hayes at this meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mississippi Delta Beyond 2000 Author: N/A Pub
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research, Education, and Economics Agricultural Research Service National Agricultural Library PROJECT TITLE: Rural Information Project DOCUMENT INFORMATION Title: Delta Vision, Delta Voices: The Mississippi Delta Beyond 2000 Author: N/A Pub. Date: 2000 Volume No.: 0006 Publisher: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Call No.: PAGE INVENTORY Pages Not Numbered: Color Plates: 58 Grayscale Halftone Plates: 19 Plate Captions: Total Pages: 144 DIRECTORY INFORMATION Root Directory: ric/group2 Second Level Directory: 0006 IMAGE SPECIFICATIONS Bitonal Resolution: 600 dpi, 1 bit Grayscale Resolution: 300 dpi, 8 bit Color Resolution: 400 dpi, 24 bit Delta VISION yüe ta VOICE i ITelta TWI§5Íi^?:ík5f -^^yond 2001) V,-/ ^»!:¿SS:r^ -^, AV^.i^^ COVER: MS River near Tallulah, LA (Courtesy NASA/UL) • Natchez Bridge: Courtesy Mayor Larry "Butch" Brown • Tomatoes: Courtesy United States Department of Agriculture • House-builders: Courtesy Mayor's Build, New Orleans Area Habitat for Humanity, Lauren Keith • FWS Employee: Courtesy U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Delta VISION, Delta VOICES: The Mississippi Delta Beyond 2000 Table of Contents Statement by President William Jefferson Clinton ¡i Statement by Vice President Al Gore ¡¡i Foreword from Secretary of Transportation Rodney E. Slater îv Executive Summary x Excerpts from President Clinton's 2000 State of the Union Address (related to the Delta Region) . xii Summary of the Clinton-Gore Administration's Budget Proposals for the Delta Region xiii Essay: John M. Barry, Author of Rising Tide 1 The Future of the Delta Region: Federal Actions, Goals and Recommendations Preface 2 I. Improving the Quality of Life 7 Diversity Housing Education Infrastructure Health Care Hunger, Nutrition and Food Security AmeriCorps and Volunteerism Disaster Assistance Community Law Enforcement II.
    [Show full text]
  • Delta Regional Authority 1 Award Agreement Between the Delta
    Award Agreement between the Delta Regional Authority and The Awardee The Following Conditions Apply to all DRA Projects Order of This Agreement is subject to the provisions of the Delta Regional Authority Precedence: Act, the Delta Regional Authority Code, and Administrative Requirements for Awards Awarded by the Delta Regional Authority and this Agreement as well as incorporated supplements, if any. Any conflict among these provisions shall be resolved giving precedence to these authorities in the order which they are listed in. The awardee acknowledges that no such provisions or any interpretations thereof shall be deemed to diminish the rights of DRA. DRA may at its option exhaust its remedies hereunder and under other documents, either concurrently or independently, and in such order as it may determine. Deadline: The Authority may revoke or revise its approval of any project if work intended to be assisted is not underway within 12 months after the date of this Agreement. Awardee’s The awardee shall comply fully with all laws and regulations. Specifically, Compliance to the awardee shall protect his or her employees under all such laws, and all laws and regulations including, but not limited to, Executive Order 11246, Sections regulations: 503 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1963, The Family and Medical Leave of 1993, and applicable workers’ compensation laws of the awardee’s state. DRA Under Run If the project contains only DRA funds, (and a non-federal share, where Policy: applicable), the DRA funds shall be returned to the DRA in the event of an under run.
    [Show full text]
  • Delta Regional Authority 101
    Delta Regional Authority 101 ABOUT The Delta Regional Authority (DRA) works to improve regional economic opportunity by helping to create jobs, build communities, and improve lives for the 10 million people who reside in the 252 counties and parishes of the eight- state Delta region. Led by the Delta Regional Authority Board -- comprised of the Federal Co-Chairman, appointed by the President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate, and the governors of the eight states -- DRA fosters local and regional partnerships that address economic and social challenges to ultimately strengthen the Delta economy and the quality of life for Delta residents. JO DAVIESS MCHENRY WINNEBAGO BOONE LAKE STEPHENSON CARROLL OGLE DE KALB KANE DU WHITESIDE PAGE COOK LEE KENDALL BUREAU LA SALLE ROCK ISLAND WILL HENRY GRUNDY MERCER PUTNAM KANKAKEE DRA REGION STARK MARSHALL KNOX WARREN WOODFORD LIVINGSTON PEORIA Per federal statute, DRA’s region HENDERSON FULTON PUTNAM SCOTLAND MERCER HANCOCK FORD IROQUOIS WORTH TAZEWELL NODAWAY MCLEAN ATCHISON SCHUYLER MCDONOUGH CLARK includes 252 counties and parishes ADAIR DE WITT HARRISON HOLT KNOX MASON GRUNDY SCHUYLER VERMILION GENTRY LOGAN SULLIVAN LEWIS DAVIESS MENARD ANDREW CASS MACON PIATT DE KALB ADAMS CHAMPAIGN LINN BROWN LIVINGSTON MACON SHELBY across eight states, collectively MARION SANGAMON DOUGLAS MORGAN MOULTRIE CLINTON CHARITON EDGAR BUCHANAN CALDWELL CHRISTIAN RALLS PIKE SCOTT MONROE RANDOLPH COLES CARROLL PLATTE CLAY designated the Mississippi River Delta RAY CALHOUN GREENE SHELBY PIKE CUMBERLAND MONTGOMERY CLARK AUDRAIN MACOUPIN SALINE BOONE HOWARD LAFAYETTE LINCOLN EFFINGHAM JASPER MONTGOMERY JERSEY FAYETTE KENTON JACKSON BOND CRAWFORD and Alabama Black Belt regions. BOONE CAMPBELL COOPER ST. CHARLES MADISON PETTIS RICHLAND CALLAWAY WARREN PENDLETON CLAY GALLATIN BRACKEN MARION LAWRENCE JOHNSON CARROLL GRANT TRIMBLE ST.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2001 Newsletter
    Arkansas State University Volume 3, Issue 3 DELTA STUDIES CENTER December 17, 2001 A Message From the Center Peggy R. Wright This year has been one of Our Accomplishments Delta Regional Authority surprises and sorrows have been numerous this hosted by DSC gave us across our country with year, and we are looking the opportunity to see the September 11th trag- forward to another great how important our infor- edy. We, at the Center, year. mation clearinghouse send out our condo- development is to the communities we serve. lences. Because of the Support Special points of interest: Plans are in place for from the East AR RC&D • East Arkansas RC &D Annual Meeting "Partnershipping two more forums and a Happy Kwanzaa, Hanuk- and the NRCS, we will be in the Delta" regional conference on kah, and Merry Christ- able to continue our Oral • DRA Federal Co-Chair Swearing in Ceremony Tourism in the Spring. mas, and a Happy New History efforts in the • Lakeport Plantation - Preserving the Past year to all of our friends Delta Region. Our appre- across the country. ciation to Representa- The forums and confer- • 1st Arkansas Black Mayors Conference tives Boyd and Dangeau ence are all made pos- • The Delta Regional Authority: Roles in African-American and to Burr Swann for sible through our Ford and Multicultural Tourism Economic Development Forum I would like to take this their lobbying on our be- Foundation funded opportunity to thank all of half for additional fund- grant "Project to Build the friends and support- the Delta Tourism In- ers of the Delta Studies ing.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Prosperity Summit Addresses Economic Decline
    Catahoula News Booster Serving Catahoula Parish since 1853 Jonesville, La. 1 Section Wednesday, February 26, 2020 Vol. 173 No. 08 50 Cents Rural Prosperity Summit addresses economic decline Thirty-three out of 64 Louisiana parishes are the federal government and state governments ond fastest growing company in the state, South- in “persistent poverty”, having suffered in that addressing 252 distressed counties and parishes ern Designs in Vidalia, Louisiana, moderated a condition for thirty years or more. This is accord- in six southeastern U.S. states including Louisiana panel on “Rural Entrepreneurship” on the first ing to data presented at the Louisiana Rural Pros- plus Illinois and Missouri. day of the conference. He offered that in a small perity Summit on February 18th and 19th held at Mayor Ceasar drew applause from the crowd community, a small business start-up can em- the Holiday Inn in Alexandria, Louisiana. when discussing schools, a foundational neces- ployee a significant percentage of the available A parish in persistent poverty is defined as sity of prosperous communities, saying, “We’ve local workforce. Hughes said that in a town of one having 20% or more of residents in pover- got to make parents accountable for children’s only a few hundred workers, a couple of dozen ty for thirty years or longer. The 33 parishes, of behavior in schools.” Ceasar complained that, “A jobs could do a lot of good and that means im- which Catahoula is one, averaged a poverty rate lot of them graduate from high school function- provement doesn’t depend on catching a big em- of 24.7% of its citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Regional Commissions and Authorities: Structural Features and Function
    Federal Regional Commissions and Authorities: Structural Features and Function Updated April 29, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45997 SUMMARY R45997 Federal Regional Commissions and Authorities: April 29, 2021 Structural Features and Function Michael H. Cecire This report describes the structure, activities, legislative history, and funding history of seven Analyst in federal regional commissions and authorities: the Appalachian Regional Commission; the Delta Intergovernmental Regional Authority; the Denali Commission; the Northern Border Regional Commission; the Relations and Economic Northern Great Plains Regional Authority; the Southeast Crescent Regional Commission; and the Development Policy Southwest Border Regional Commission. All seven regional commissions and authorities are broadly modeled after the Appalachian Regional Commission structure, which is composed of a federal co-chair appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, and the member state governors, of which one is appointed the state co - chair. This structure is broadly replicated in the other commissions and authorities, albeit with notable variations and exceptions to local contexts. In addition, the service areas for all of the federal regional commissions and authorities are defined in statute and thus can only be amended or modified through congressional action. While the service areas for the federal regional commissions and authorities have shifted over time, those jurisdictions have not changed radically in their respective service lives. Of the seven federal regional commissions and authorities, four could be considered active: the Appalachian Regional Commission; the Delta Regional Authority; the Denali Commission; and the Northern Border Regional Commission. The four active regional commissions and authority received $15 million to $180 million in appropriations in FY2021 for their various activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadbandusa Federal Funding Guide Fiscal Year 2021 Updated: May 28, 2021
    BroadbandUSA Federal Funding Guide Fiscal Year 2021 Updated: May 28, 2021 This guide includes the same information that is found on NTIA’s Federal Funding site, updated with the support of participating agencies, to make it easier for providers and communities to find federal funding and permitting information. Funding opportunities include direct grants, loans, indirect support, and discounts for industry, state and local governments, schools, libraries, small businesses, and other community institutions that are interested in expanding and improving broadband access. Additional programs will be added as provided by agencies. Table of Contents Appalachian Regional Commission………………………...…………………………1 Delta Regional Authority………………………………………………………………10 Denali Commission……………………………………………………...……............15 Department of Agriculture…………………………………………………………….18 Department of Commerce……............................................................................41 Department of Education……………………………………………...……………...51 Department of Housing and Urban Development…………………..…………….112 Department of Labor…………………………………………………………………143 Department of Treasury.…………………………………………………………….153 Federal Communications Commission...……………….………………………….161 Institute of Museum and Library Services…………………………………………177 Northern Border Regional Commission……………………………………………189 National Science Foundation……………………….………………………………192 Appalachian Regional Commission FY21 BroadbandUSA Federal Funding Site Update Department: Appalachian Regional Commission 1 Federal Agency/Bureau Appalachian
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy
    Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 2014 3516 Parliament Court, Alexandria, LA 71303 318-487-5454 ph www.kdelta.org 318-487-5451 fx COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY CONTENTS PROLOGUE What is a CEDS? .................................................................................................................. 4 What is a Planning Organization? ........................................................................................ 4 CEDS Committee and Leadership ....................................................................................... 5 Community and Private Sector Engagement and Participation .......................................... 6 Planning Interaction and Related Planning Activities .......................................................... 9 Reflections on Disaster Continuity ................................................................................... 11 Disaster Resiliency Planning Perspective ........................................................................... 11 SECTION 1: BACKGROUND Understanding your region .............................................................................................. 14 Geography Resources Environment Population Workforce Development and Use Infrastructure Transportation Access Other Concerns Economic foundations and historical perspective ............................................................. 32 SECTION 2: ANALYSIS Unemployment, Job Losses, and Income .......................................................................... 39 Economic
    [Show full text]