Arxiv:1507.01093V7 [Cond-Mat.Supr-Con] 13 Sep 2015 Erhfrro Eprtr Uecnutvt Predicted Superconductivity Temperature Room for Search While [20]

Home , BCS theory

arXiv:1507.01093v7 [cond-mat.supr-con] 13 Sep 2015 erhfrro eprtr uecnutvt predicted superconductivity temperature room for search while [20]. 12–19] model [10, superconductivity hole theory the Eliashberg proposes the Hirsh by described is ipooto rm2(H from Disproportion ld httesprodcigpaei rsuie H pressurized in phase superconducting the that clude Xtallogra- [11]. Evolutionary (USPEX) phy algorithm Predictor: high evolutionary Structure the at Universal structures science: material crystalline in predict pressure theoretical to successful al. the used et using Duan approach by obtained of been prediction has theoretical [10] The pressure. high ufrhdiea eyhg rsue[] e eut of results T new with [1], superconductivity pressure temperature high room very near at hydride sulfur e ffc n h rsuedpnetciia tempera- critical dependent H pressure Meiss- of the the ture shows and [2] effect group [4]. Emerets’s ner interest of scientific [3] work high Italy recent very Ischia, The a triggered in have conference they 2015 and Superstripes at 2015 uecnutvt nslu yrd H hydride sulfur in superconductivity pressures high extreme at supercon- hydrides [5–9]. temperature different room in for ductors research materials the .. tol -70 only at i.e., K rsuewspeitdb 1]t cu ntehg pres- high the in H occur to metallic [10] sure by predicted was pressure isiztastosadzr on atc utain in fluctuations lattice point zero and transitions Lifshitz h rmt’ ru eerhwsmtvtdb the by motivated was research group Eremets’s The ayo rcdn hoeia tde nti su con- issue this on studies theoretical preceding of Many olwn al liso 9 uecnutvt in superconductivity K 190 of claims early Following h xeietldsoeyo erro temperature room near of discovery experimental The 1 IMS,Rm nentoa etrfrMtrasSineS Science Materials for Center International Rome RICMASS, 3 2 3 NT,CnozoItrnvriai ainl e aScie la per Nazionale Interuniversitario Consorzio INSTM, n D and S nttt fCytlorpy osgi ainl el R delle Nazionale Consiglio Crystallography, of Institute n on.W ics h edo Bianconi-Perali-Vallett of need H the spots in discuss surface We Fermi superconductivity small point. w a M coexists on and which (located energy) regime Fermi crossover high BEC with surface Fermi large H that propose e ol eddi h erhfrnwro eprtr super temperature 74.20.Pq,74.72.-h,74.25.Jb room numbers: new PACS for search the tempe in critical needed the tools amplify t key to similar contribution gaps, relevant superconducting a in gives resonance shape condens the different Here between interaction configuration the and rniin,btwr elce npeiu aeso h H t the of on topology papers previous the in z of neglected changes and were induce assi pressure but We could by dis transitions, pressure induced in coefficient. that transitions 0.5, isotope known Lifshitz and constant to 0.25 nearly between coefficient a coefficient predicts isotope which the of changes nw uecnutn rtcltemperature critical superconducting known mrt’ xeiet npesrzdslu yrd aes have hydride sulfur pressurized on experiments Emerets’s 4 3 .INTRODUCTION. I. PC nvriyo eea 4Qa retAsre,CH-12 Ernest-Ansermet, Quai 24 Geneva, of University DPMC, hs,with phase, S o 3 2 aebe rsne nJn 17, June on presented been have [2] C .Teerslshv rgee today triggered have results These S. 2 )+H + S) 3 samligpsprodco ihafis odnaei the in condensate first a with superconductor multi-gap a is S 2 Im o2(H to omtmeauesuperconductivity temperature room 3 3 ¯ .I nldsbt h orcino h hmclpotential chemical the of correction the both includes It S. noi Bianconi Antonio m atc symmetry. lattice 3 2 )ocr tvery at occurs S) tvr high very at S c =203 1 3 , T 2 S , c 3 0K h mrt aaso rsueinduced pressure show data Emerets The 203K. = n hmsJarlborg Thomas and oeeg nmtli yrgnadhdie [21–29]. hydrides and hydrogen metallic in emerge to arn,uigasnl au ftedniyo ttsat states of density the of isotropic level value and Fermi single band the a single simple [30] using a a formulas pairing, with for BCS valid crystal, the approximations, homogeneous many theory with BCS Weobtained con- standard the here by mechanism. call mediated phonon-exchange is attractive pairing cou- weak ventional the a where in regime, pairs pling Cooper interacting wave- of body made many function condensate superconducting the of tion nryo h hnnadavr iheeto density electron high very energy Fermi a high and a phonon i.e., small very the a of assumes energy theory BCS standard the Moreover h ciln[2 3 n h laheg[4 formula. [34] by Eliashberg given the coupling and 33] strong [32, to McMillan due the inter- corrections repulsive required and electron-electron has action the of approximations introduction theory the of BCS frame of the standard prediction in the The temperature critical separated. superconducting rigorously the of be degrees ionic can and freedom electronic the where Born-Oppenheimer approximation, adiabatic the within [31] proximation n togeeto-hnnculn 2,2,2] nfact approximation In band 28]. single 24, the [22, in phonons standard coupling energy high of electron-phonon of frame strong role the and the in on only K based 30 theory than BCS larger be cannot ture n lcrnccytl ie hredniywvs spin waves, density charge form- like, space, real crystals the at electronic in liquid order extreme ing to electron for prefers the temperature but low coupling strength electron-phonon coupling strong and energy phonon h C hoy[0 a ie irsoi descrip- microscopic a given has [30] theory BCS The twsrpdywl cetdta h rtcltempera- critical the that accepted well rapidly was It crh,vaSlra 01 otrtno Italy Monterotondo, 00015 Salaria, via icerche, prtie,VadiSbli19,015Rm,Italy Rome, 00185 119A, Sabelli dei Via uperstripes, z enlgadiMtrai oeUr Italy Udr, Rome Materiali, dei Tecnologia e nza aue hrfr hswr rvdssome provides work this Therefore rature. ts elce yteEisbr theory. Eliashberg the by neglected ates, ehahrsnnei lrcl gases, ultracold in resonance Feshbach o BV uecnutvt hoyfor theory superconductivity (BPV) a t eodcnestsi h BCS- the in condensates second a ith 3 onta H that hown r on atc utain.I is It fluctuations. lattice point ero uecnutvt su.Hr we Here issue. superconductivity S ihsalFrieeg)na h Γ the near energy) Fermi small with ntepesr eedn isotope dependent pressure the gn conductors. gemn ihEisbr theory Eliashberg with agreement eFrisrae aldLifshitz called surface, Fermi he N 1Gnv ,Switzerland 4, Geneva 11 ufrhdiesoignear showing hydride sulfur 0 n osatculn constant coupling constant a and 4 3 ea a h highest the has metal S ω C eie(nthe (in regime BCS 0 /E u opairing to due F << T c nrae ihboth with increases aldMga ap- Migdal called 1 λ . 2

route to rise the critical temperature of superconductivity toward the maximum possible energy, KBTc/EF ∼ 1 was proposed in 1994 based on the non standard BCS theories where the control of Tc can be achieved not only by increasing the pairing strength but also by the control of the condensation energy, via a pair exchange mechanism between condensates, called the shape resonance in superconducting gaps [42–45]. It was proposed that cuprates are actually complex inhomogeneous materials with lattice quenched disorder, lattice modulations and short range charge density waves giving multiple Fermi surface arcs where in each Fermi arc there is a different superconducting condensate. One of these condensates is in the polaronic regime, where the Migdal approximation is violated ω0/EF ∼ 1, and the condensate is in the BCS-BEC crossover regime while the other condensates are within the Migdal approximation ω0/EF << 1. In 1996-1998 [46–50] a superconductivity theory was developed by Bianconi, Perali, Valletta (BPV) based on the Blatt [37] and Legget [41] theories. The superconducting critical temperature here is not only controlled only FIG. 1: (Color online) The crystalline structure of H3S with by the cooper pair formation but also by the exchange ¯ Im3m lattice symmetry, with two formula units per unit cell, terms between pairs. These terms control the condensa- with sulfur (yellow large spheres) and hydrogen atoms (red tion energy and phase coherence and are unavoidable in- small spheres). The linear S-H-S hydrogen bonds along the gredients for the formation and stability of high temper- a,b and c axis in the Im3¯m lattice of H3S, form a first 3D network of three linear chains of covalent bonds crossing at ature superconducting condensate with short coherence the sulfur atom at S1(0,0,0,) which coexists with a second 3D length. A similar mechanism, called Feshbach resonance, network of other three linear chains of covalent bonds (solid was proposed later to increase the critical temperature black lines) crossing at the sulfur atom at S1(0.5,0.5,0.5). for the formation of the superfluid condensate in ultracold atoms [51, 52]. Later other many body theories have been proposed aimed to control the condensation energy density waves, which compete with the superconducting and the global phase coherence in superconductors and phase. Moreover if superconductivity survives increasing superfluids [53, 54]. electron-phonon coupling, the critical temperature de- Details of the normal metallic phase become key ingre- creases since the phonon energy is pushed toward zero. dients in these non standard BCS theories: a) the com- In these regime the lattice structure collapses and the plex Fermiology, beyond the single band model; b) the system is in the verge of a catastrophe. Therefore it was formation of charge density waves and polaronic Wigner known that materials research for room temperate su- crystals involving the electronic component in n-th Fermi perconductivity cannot be driven simply by looking to surfaces beyond the Migdal approximation ω0/EnF ∼ 1; increase the phonon energy and coupling strength in the c) the strong electronic correlations in the electron fluid with very low Fermi energy, beyond the usually assumed cooper pairing. The theoretical predictions of high Tc in solid hydrogen and hydrates at high pressure were Fermi gas approximation; e) the anomalous or negative based not only on the high frequency phonons mediat- dielectric response controlling the electron-electron in- ing the pairing in solid hydrogen or hydrates but also on teraction; f) the complex inhomogeneous spatial geom- joint control of the electron electron interaction via the etry in systems with nanoscale phase separation [55] in- changes of the dielectric constant controlling the repul- duced by electron-lattice interaction and lattice misfit sive electron-electron interaction and the Coulomb en- strain [56] which can give also insulator to superconduc- ergy [21–29] which can become negative [22, 24, 28] for tor phase transitions [57]. an electronic system in the low density limit. The self consistent quantum many body theory of superconductivity, avoiding the BCS approximations, was II. SUPERCONDUCTIVITY IN BINARY INTERMETALLICS: A15 AND DIBORIDES made by Bogoliubov [35], giving the fundamental spec- trum of excited quasiparticles. It was developed by Gorkov [36] and Blatt [37] including the contribution to The overall features of superconductivity in H3S show the critical temperature of the condensation energy, re- that it is like other binary intermetallics, as diborides lated with Josephson-like [40] terms, [38, 39] and consid- and A15 systems therefore we shown in figure 2 the evo- ering multiple symmetries of possible multiple conden- lution of the maximum critical temperature of diatomic sates with a single critical temperature [41]. A second intermetallics. 3

tial giving a Lifshitz transition for the appearing of two small hole-like σ Fermi pockets[74]. Moreover because of zero point atomic ﬂuctuations[75, 76], the Fermi energy 0 in the σ bands is time and space dependent therefore the 280 Migdal approximation ω0/E < 1, is violated and the T F S c 3 Eliashberg theory fails, when the Fermi energy is tuned 240 -50 (°C) H over a large energy range of 600 meV above the bottom

200 /X of band edge.[77, 78] Therefore in spite of the conven- 2 -100 tional phonon mediated pairing, the 40 K superconduct- 160 ing phase in magnesium diboride needs a non standard (Kelvin) c CuO -150 BCS theory. Considering all data collected in diborides T 120 2 doped with Sc and Al for Mg or with C for B it was Ge 80 3 -200 possible to give a theoretical interpretation of the vari-

MgB ation of the two superconducting gaps and the critical /X Nb

40 60 -250 temperature as a function of the energy separation be- C

FeAs/X tween the top of the σ band and the chemical potential 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 using the BPV theory[79]. The superconducting σ gaps are much larger than the gaps in the large π Fermi sur- Years faces and evolve as a function of the energy separation of the top of the σ band and the chemical potential[79]. The small percentage of the partial electronic density of FIG. 2: (Color online) The superconducting critical temper- states, DOS(σ), relative to the total DOS(tot), usually ature of superconducting elements, open black circles, binary entering in the standard McMillan formula for T , gives a intermetallics, filled blue triangles, and ternary and quater- c large superconducting σ gap, which drives the full system nary oxide layered perovskites made of CuO2-atomic layers with different X spacer layers (filled red squares) coefficient to the highest critical temperature known in binary inter- as a function of the year of the discovery. metallics, before the recent discovery of Eremets’s group [2]. In a single band metal, where ω0/EF ∼ 1 the Migdal and the adiabatic approximations [76] fail, the system enters in the BCS-BEC crossover [80, 81] and both weak A15 compounds (like Nb3Ge) have the same Im3m lat- coupling BCS [30] and strong coupling Eliashberg theo- tice structure [58] as H3S above 100 GPa (shown in Fig.1) ries breakdown. On the contrary the superconductivity which is made of two intertwined networks of atomic phase in a system with multiple condensates, where only wires running in 3D as noticed by Friedel [59, 60] within one or two of the Fermi surface spots are in the BCS-BEC a 3D density of states [61–63] and superconductivity ap- ctossover while other condensates in the large Fermi sur- pears in highly inhomogeneous phases at the edge of a faces are in the BCS regime, can be described by the lattice catastrophe due incipient structural phase transi- theory of Bianconi Perali Valletta (BPV) [41, 79] cor- tions [64–66] giving complex pattern of defects and local rectly describing the multi-gap superconductivity at the lattice fluctuations [67–69]. BCS-BEC crossover avoiding standard approximations. Following the discovery of superconductivity in MgB2 The condensation energy of the pairs is determined by in 2001 it was first proposed [70] the breakdown of the many body configuration interaction between pairs form- Eliashberg theory and the need of BPV theory including ing the single macroscopic superconducting quantum co- shape resonance to describe this system made of mul- herent phase. The condensation energy [38] is relevant a) tiple condensates and a single critical temperature. The in the BCS-BEC crossover ∆ /E ∼ 1 and in the for- breakdown of the Eliashberg theory was rapidly accepted n F n mation of the superconducting quantum coherent phase by the community. The theoretical assumptions used by with a single T in a system made of multiple gaps ∆ in standard BCS theory, considering a single band and sin- c n different bands with different Fermi energies EF n. The gle gap, fail due to anisotropic pairing in the clean limit. shift of the chemical potential going from the normal to The standard BCS formulas failed to predict accurately the superconducting phase below Tc, becomes a key term the unusually high transition temperature, the effects of in MBBC, while on the contrary it is considered to be isotope substitution on the critical transition tempera- negligible in standard BCS. The results of the BPV the- ture, and the anomalous specific heat of MgB2. While ory applied to doped magnesium diboride [79] show that some authors proposed the multi-band superconductiv- it is in a regime of multiple condensates with different ity theory [71] in the clean limit and weak coupling, it symmetry with the key role of the shape resonance in was rapidly shown the need of strong coupling anisotropic the superconducting gaps between one condensate in the two band Eliashberg theory to describe this unexpected BCS-BEC crossover, in the σ band, and other conden- novel superconducting phase [72, 73]. The isostructural sates in the BCS regime, in the π bands, with an essential AlB2 system with only π electrons at the Fermi level Josephson-like pair exchange term. becomes superconductor only when the chemical doping pushes the top of the σ band above the chemical poten- 4

superconductivity. The shape resonance mechanism considers the relevant contribution, near the Lifshitz transition, of the exchange interaction between pairs in the hot spots and in all other points of the Fermi surfaces in the k space. We have learn that the ”Devil is in the details”, in fact for the optimization of a high critical temperature it is necessary to reach particular Lifshitz transitions where a small number of electrons in a new appearing Fermi surface (the hot spot) are in the extreme strong coupling regime in the antiadiabatic ω0/EF n ∼ 1 regime in the normal phase without the lattice catastrophe since the majority of the electron gas is in large Fermi surfaces well in the Midgal approximation ω0/EF n < 1. The shape resonance in superconducting gaps is a Josephson- like term describing a contact interaction between pairs which increases the critical temperature for the pairs condensation, very similar to the Feshbach resonance in ultracold gases [51, 52] driving up the ratio between kBTc and the Fermi energy up to value of 0.2. In the superfluid phase in the hot spot is in the BCS-BEC crossover ∆n/EF n ∼ 1 [86] and the shape resonances in the super- FIG. 3: (Color online) The pressure dependent isotope coef- conducting gaps can be optimized to amplify the critical ficient as a function of pressure (filled circles) calculated by temperature to the highest value [50]. A large zero point interpolation of the experimental data of the critical temper- lattice motion is a key term in the theory of the shape res- ature of H3S (dashed green line) and D3S) solid blue line reported by Droz et al. [2] onance in superconducting gaps whichj is in action in the proximity of the Lifshitz transitions. It was proposed to play a key role in cuprates[42, 46, 49, 87–89], it was veri- fied be in action in diborides[74, 79] and it was confirmed III. LIFSHITZ TRANSITIONS. in iron based superconductors [90–99]. We discuss below the failure of the standard Midgal approximation and of the breakdown of Eliasberg theory in H3S. The large The topological changes of the Fermi surface of the nor- electron-phonon coupling and the high frequencies of H- mal phase caused by the lattice strain (as a response to phonons contribute to rise T [10, 15, 19] but we claim pressure), misfit strain, chemical substitution, variation c the need of theories beyond Eliasberg theory. like the of the electronic density) are called Lifshitz transitions multigap BCS-BEC crossover (MBBC) theory and the [82]. In many cases Lifshitz transitions appear on points BPV shape resonance mechanism to describe the gaps or lines of high symmetry in the Brillouin zone and are as- in the new small Fermi surfaces appearing at the Lifshitz sociated with changes of the symmetry or dimensionality transitions controlled by pressure and their configuration of the wave functions of the electrons at the Fermi level interaction with the gap in the large Fermi surface. in critical Fermi surfaces. The Lifshitz transitions are revealed experimentally by anomalies in lattice parameters, in the density of states near the Fermi energy, in elastic IV. ISOTOPE EFFECT IN H S. properties, in anomalous thermodynamic and transport 3 properties of metallic materials [83]. Lifshitz [82]. noted that at zero temperature, T = 0, Lifshitz transitions are The isotope effect in H3S [1] has provided a direct ev- true phase transitions of order 2.5 (as in Ehrenfest’s clas- idence of the involvement of the lattice degree of free- sification) therefore are called ”2.5 Lifshitz transition”. dom in the pairing process. Therefore the isotope effect A sharp Lifshitz transition at T=0, at high temperature in sulfur hydrate at high pressure H3S has been inter- shows a crossover character. In presence of strong inter- preted as ruling out theories of unconventional supercon- actions the 2.5 phase transition becomes first order with ductivity (based only on spin liquid models or magnetic a phase separation between two phases where the chem- interactions) and supporting conventional theories of su- ical potential in each phase is shifted above and below perconductivity based on the role of lattice fluctuations. the Lifshitz transition respectively[78, 84, 85] driving the However the standard BCS theory predicts a pressure in- system well tuned at a Lifshitz transition on the verge of dependent isotope coefficient 0.5 while in non standard a lattice catastrophe as shown in the case of A15 and di- BCS theories, like in the multigap anisotropic BCS, the borides. While in the early times the interest was focused isotope coefficient deviates from 0.5 as in magnesium di- on Lifshitz transitions in single band metals, now the in- boride where it is 0.26 [100]. From the new results re- terest is addressed to Lifshitz transitions in multi-band ported by Droz et al. [2] we have extracted the isotope metals with different Fermi surfaces showing multi-gap coefficient as a function of pressure shown in figure 3. 5

We can see in figure 3 large variations of the isotope coefficient reaching a minimum of 0.2 and first maximum reaching 0.5 at 170 GPa and a second peak at 240 a=5.6 a.u. GPa. The anomalous pressure dependent isotope coef- 2 a=5.8 a.u. ficient has been found in cuprates superconductors as a a=6.0 a.u. α function of doping [49, 88, 89] with anomalies where the a=6.2 a.u. β chemical potential crosses Lifshitz transitions driven by 1 pressure. Therefore the data in figure 3 indicate the pos- γ δ sible presence of Lifshitz transitions in the pressure range ) (eV) showing near room temperature superconductivity. F 0 (E−E V. BAND STRUCTURE CALCULATION OF −1 H3S AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE

We have performed preliminary band structure −2 calculations[101] of H3S with Im3¯m lattice symmetry made using the linear muffin-tin orbital (LMTO) method [102, 103] and the local spin-density approxima- M Γ tion (LSDA) [104]. We show in Fig. 4 the dispersion of the bands crossing the chemical potential in the Γ − M FIG. 4: (Color online) The dispersion of the bands in the direction. electronic structure of H3S calculated using the simple cubic Self-consistent paramagnetic calculations are made for cell, used for A15 compounds with Im3¯m structure, between a simple cubic unit cell containing 8 sites totally, used M and Γ points. The band dispersion in this direction gives for A15 compounds with the same crystalline structure. the narrow DOS peak near the Fermi energy. Moreover we The details of the method have been published earlier show the variation of this bands at different pressure with [105–108]. The present calculations are in good agree- changing the lattice parameter between a=6.2 a.u and a=5.6. ment with previous band structure calculations [15–19]. We show that there are bands (β and γ ) forming 3 small We confirm the presence of a narrow peak of the occupied Fermi surfaces at the Γ point and another band crosses the zero energy at the point indicated by δ which gives a new total Density of States (DOS) very close to the chemical small hole pocket at high pressure. potential at 200 GPa i.e., for a=5.6 a.u. The narrow peak in the total DOS in a narrow energy range around the chemical potential is shown in Fig. 5. While previous papers have stated that this peak is pinned at the zero energy, we show in Fig. 5 that the energy position of 2.5 this peak relative to the chemical potential shifts with pressure. The narrow peak of the DOS is pushed toward a=5.4 a.u. high energy by pressure and it crosses the chemical po- 2 a=5.6 a.u. tential at the highest P for the lattice constant smaller a=5.8 a.u. than a=5.8 a.u.. a=6.0 a.u. 1 − The narrow peak of the DOS peak is related with the a=6.2 a.u. 1.5 flat dispersion of bands in the Γ − M direction in the en- eV) ergy range of 2 eV below the chemical potential. shown in ⋅ Fig. 4. The band structure shows a first steep band with very large energy dispersion with its band edges at about 1

20 eV away from the chemical potential. This first band DOS (cell gives the large Fermi surface shown in [13]. There are three other small Fermi surface pockets centered around 0.5 the Γ point shown in Fig. 4 for different lattice parameter a. The tops of the hole-like bands near the Γ point are be- 0 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5 low EF at low pressure P but they move above the chem- (E−E ) (eV) ical potential above 130 GPa pressure as shown in Fig.4. F The edges of these bands cross the chemical potential as function of P giving topological Lifshitz transitions with FIG. 5: (Color online) The total DOS for H3S at different lat- the appearing of new Fermi surfaces. Moreover there is tice constants. A sharp peak of the DOS crosses the chemical a small Fermi surface hole pocket due to the crossing of potential at high pressure. one band at about 2/3 of the Γ − M distance indicated 6 by δ in Fig. 4 which appears only for lattice parameters smaller than a ∼ 5.8. a.u., i.e. in the pressure range of highest P when Tc is highest. The top of this band goes from -0.2 eV below the chemical potential to +0.1 eV when a decreases from 6.2 to 5.6 a.u.. Finally we asso- ciate the crossing of the chemical potential by this band at δ in Fig. 4 with the Fermi level crossing of the narrow DOS peak in Fig. 5. Let us now consider the fact that because of the zero- point motion (ZPM) the different Fermi energies in the small pockets show large energy fluctuations like in magnesium diboride. The ZPM is large because of the small mass of H atoms and it has large effects on the fluctuations of electronic structure. Such effects have been shown to be important in several different materials, even if their atomic masses are larger [112–114]. Lattice fluctuations can perturb spin waves and phonons in high-Tc cuprates and it cannot be neglected if superconductivity relies on few phonons coupled with particular bands [115]. The Debye temperature for H phonons is high (∼ 1800K) and the amplitude of lattice fluctuations from ZPM is large already at low T . With a force constant K = Mω2 of 7 eV/A˚2 we obtain an average amplitude u of the order 0.15 A.˚ As seen in Fig. 5, the first high ly- ing valence band has a width is about 2 Ry. This makes the band dispersion and Fermi velocities high in the first FIG. 6: (Color online) Energy shift of the tops of the three band forming the Fermi surface centered at the R point. hole-like bands at the Γ point (solid red line, dashed red line The effects of energy band broadening is negligible here and dotted yellow line) crossing the chemical potential at 100 since the chemical potential is far from band edges. The GPa, where the errors bars and the red region indicates the large effect of the zero point motion is on the small Fermi zero point energy fluctuations of the band edges. The filled pockets near the Γ point. The low-T energy band fluctu- black dots and the dotted black line show the energy shift of ations in materials with narrower band widths has been the top of the band crossing the chemical potential at about found to be about 20 meV for u in the range 0.03-0.04 2/3 of the Γ − M distance of the Brillouin zone. The open A[112,˚ 113, 115]. From an extrapolation of these values to circles and the blue dashed line show the energy shift of the narrow peak of DOS near the chemical potential the conditions in H3S we estimate that the band energy fluctuation can be of the order of 160 meV for H-bands. Therefore when the chemical potential is tuned by pressure near a Lifshitz transition, so that the EnF in one VI. BPV THEORY FOR MULTI-GAPS of the bands is of the order of 160 meV the topology of SUPERCONDUCTORS AT THE BCS-BEC the small Fermi surfaces made of small hole- or electron- CROSSOVER pockets shows strong dynamical fluctuations controlled by the zero point lattice fluctuations. The standard BCS theory in undergraduate courses Figure 6 shows the energy position of the top of the 3 considers a homogeneous single band metal and describes bands at the Γ point and the band at about 2/3 of the Γ− the cooper pairing in weak coupling limit as due to quan- M distance as a function of pressure. The energy spread tum exchange of a low energy phonon between two high due to zero point lattice fluctuations is indicated by the energy electrons at the Fermi level in the Migdal approx- red area for states at the Γ point by the yellow area for the imation where the gap energy is much smaller than the states at Γ−M point. The shift of the energy position of Fermi energy and the gap to critical temperature ratio is the narrow peak in the DOS near the chemical potential equal to 1.75. Non standard BCS theories diverge sub- tracks the top of the band at the Γ-M point indicates stantially from the standard BCS theory. Let us simplify that the chemical potential here is tuned at the Lifshitz a long story by classify 7 different non standard BCS transition appearing around 170 GPa for the appearing of theories. Let us start with the first group considering this new Fermi surface. Finally these results show that in a single effective band, in a dirty limit, giving a single superconducting pressurized sulfur hydrate metal is made condensate: 1A) the standard strong coupling Eliash- of one large Fermi surface and four small pockets tuned berg theories considering a high energy phonon or vi- by pressure at Lifshitz transitions like doping tune the bron (a quantum of intramolecular vibration) interacting metal in cuprates at Lifshitz transitions for the appearing with electrons having a large Fermi energy ω0/EF << 1. new Fermi surface arcs [42, 46, 49]. Most of previous theories for high Tc in sulfur hydrates 7 have proposed this approach for a large phonon frequency ing the simplest case of a two dimensional system [49] but and strong coupling; 1B) the theories considering the the extension to three dimensional system [79] is trivial. case of a low density electron gas beyond the Midgal ap- 0 − proximation ω /EF n > 1 where the single condensate is En,ky +ǫkx µ ′ tanh( ) formed by BEC condensation or by BCS-BEC crossover 1 n,n 2Tc ′ ′ ′ ∆n,ky = − Vk,k ∆n ,ky , (1) ∆n/EF ∼ 1; 1C) non standard BCS theories which con- 2N ′ ′ En,k + ǫk − µ nX,k y x sider pairing mediated by electronic excitations, called exciton theories. where the energy dispersion is measured with respect to The second group of non standard BCS theories consid- the chemical potential. ers the anisotropic BCS theory, in the clean limit, there- We consider a superconductor with multiple gaps fore they focus on multi-gap superconductivity where ∆n,ky in multiple bands n with flat band-like dispersion multiple gaps are formed in different in different spots in the y direction and steep free-electron-like dispersion of the k-space. These non standard BCS theories con- in the x direction for a simple model of a two dimensional sider metals with multiple bands with different symme- metal with a one-dimensional superlattice modulation in try crossing the chemical potential: 2A) The multiband the y-direction. The self consistent equation for the gaps BCS model where all multiple Fermi surfaces are in the at (T = 0) where each gap depends on the other gaps is BCS limit; 2B) the Fermi-Bose model where the Fermi given by level of a first band is degenerate with a single level, occu- ′ pied by paired electrons. Here a BCS condensate coexist n,n Vk k′ ∆ ′ ′ with bosons which undergoes a Bose condensation; 2C) 1 , n ,ky ∆n,k = − , y 2 2 the extreme case of superconductivity driven mostly by 2N ′ ′ ′ ′ ′ ′ ′ ′ n ,kX,k (En ,ky + ǫkx − µ) + ∆n ,k exchange like interband pairing with very weak, or no y x q y intraband pairing; 2D) The theory of shaperesonance in (2) superconducting gaps for multi-condensates with a small where N is the total number of wave-vectors in the′ interband pairing, emerging in metals where: a first small n,n discrete summation, µ is the chemical potential, Vk,k′ is charge density in small Fermi surfaces form condensates the effective pairing interaction in the BEC- BCS crossover, beyond Migdal approximation, which coexists with a majority of charges in large ′ ′ n,n n,n Fermi surfaces forming BCS condensates. Vk,k′ = Vk,k′

A third group of theories consider the case of sys- ′ ′ ′ × θ(ω0 −e |En,ky + ǫkx − µ|)θ(ω0 − |En ,ky + ǫkx − µ|) tems with relevant electronic and lattice inhomogeneity (3) with insulator to superconductor transitions in presence of nanoscale phase separation where the Josephson-like Here we take account of the interference effects be- interaction between localized condensates play a key role. tween the wave functions of the pairing electrons in the ′ Here we focus on the BPV (Bianconi, Perali, Valletta) different bands, where n and n are the band indexes, ′ ′ theory which correctly inculde the shape resonance (2D) ky(ky) is the superlattice wave-vector and kx(kx) is the mechanism, proposed for cuprates, [42, 46, 49, 50, 87–89] component of the wave-vector in the free-electron-like di- diborides [74, 79] and iron based superconductors [90–92]. rection of the initial (final) state in the pairing process. This mechanism (2D) is proposed here for sulfur hydrides at very high pressure following the reported evidence for ′ ′ n,n λn,n Lifshitz transitions driven by high pressure. Vk,k′ = − S N0 We recall bellow the BPV theory for multi gap super- e (4) conductors at the BCS-BEC crossover including shape × ψ ′ − ′ (y)ψ − (y)ψ (y)ψ ′ ′ (y)dxdy, Z n , ky n, ky n,ky n ,ky resonances. Let us consider a system made of multiple S bands with index n, having a steep free electron like dis- Here N0 is the DOS at EF without the lattice mod- persion in the x direction and a flat band-like dispersion ulation, λn,n′ is the dimensionless coupling parameter, in the y direction. The energy separation between the S = LxLy is the surface of the plane and ψn,ky (y) are chemical potential and the bottom of the n-th band de- the eigenfunctions in the 1D superlattice. The gap equa- fines the Fermi energy of the n-th band. This formula- tion need to be solved iteratively. The anisotropic gaps tion was proposed for complex systems in presence of dependent on the band index and on the superlattice one-dimensional lattice modulation or one-dimensional wave-vector ky. According with Leggett [41] the ground- charge density waves where the chemical potential is state BCS wave function corresponds to an ensemble of tuned near a Lifshitz transition like in magnesium di- overlapping Cooper pairs at weak coupling (BCS regime) borides, A15, cuprates, iron based superconductors and and evolves to molecular (non-overlapping) pairs with we propose here for sulfur hydrate at high pressure. bosonic character and this approach remains valid also if The formula for the superconducting critical temper- a particular band is in the BCS-BEC crossover and be- ature Tc in a anisotronic multi-gap non standard BCS yond Migdal approximation because all other bands are scheme is given by the linearized BCS equation consider- in the BCS regime and in the Migdal approximation. 8

However in this anomalous regime, where Eliashberg The amplitude of the energy fluctuations of this band theory breakdown, on density: by increasing coupling or edge due to atomic zero point motion has been calculated decreasing the density by approaching the band edge, and we have found that it pushes this DOS peak above the chemical potential µ results strongly renormalized the chemical potential. Therefore dynamical energy fluc- with respect to the Fermi energy EF of the non interact- tuations of the band edge due to zero point motion of the ing system, and approaches minus half of the molecular hydrogen atoms is of high relevance. We find a colossal binding energy of the corresponding two-body problem zero point energy fluctuation which induces a 160 meV in the vacuum. In the case of a Lifshitz transition, de- energy fluctuation of the Lifshitz transitions. The present scribed in this paper, all electrons in the new appear- results show that the condensates in the 4 small hole ing Fermi surface condense forming a condensate in the pockets around the Γ point and the small Fermi surface BCS-BEC crossover. Therefore at any chosen value of in the Γ−M direction are beyond the Migdal approxima- the charge density for a number of the occupied bands tion ω0/EF ∼ 1, including lattice dynamical zero point Nb, the chemical potential in the superconducting phase fluctuations. In particular the condensate in the hole-like should be renormalized by the gap opening at any chosen δ Fermi surface pocket, associated with the sharp quasi- value of the charge density ρ using the following formula: 1D peak in the DOS, pushed at the chemical potential by pressure, is clearly in the BCS-BEC crossover regime, coexisting with other condensates in the BCS regime in Nb 1 En,k + ǫk − µ other large Fermi surfaces in the pressure range where ρ = 1 − y x  LxLy 2 2 the superconducting critical temperature is near room Xn kXx,ky (En,ky + ǫkx − µ) + ∆n,k  q y  temperature. Nb π/lp The emerging scenario is pairing in sulfur hydrides at δk ǫmin 2N(ǫ) ǫmax N(ǫ) = y dǫ + dǫ high pressure in a dynamical landscape where key en- Z Z π 0 Lx ǫmin Lx nX=1 kXy =0 ergy parameters have all the same magnitude i.e, of the order of 160 meV: 1. the energy separation between the th En,ky + ǫkx − µ average position of the n band edge and the chemical × 1 −  . th 2 2 potential, defined as the n Fermi energy controlling the (En,ky + ǫkx − µ) + ∆n,k  q y  ”appearing or disappearing Fermi surface spot” Lifshitz (5) transition in the Fermi surface topology, 2. the energy separation of a peak in the Density of States and the taking the increment in ky as δky = 2π/Ly for a size band edge, usually controlling the ”Neck opening” Lif- of the considered surface aLx Ly and in the range shitz transition 3. the amplitude of the energy fluctuation of the critical Fermi surfaces associated with zero ǫmin = max 0,µ − ω0 − En,ky , point lattice fluctuations 4. The energy of the pairing ǫmax = max 0,µ + ω0 − En,ky , interaction defining the energy of the cut-off for the for- L mations of pairs away from the chemical potential N(ǫ)= x , ǫ In this scenario the BCS approximations used in the 2π 2m p standard BCS theory are no more valid and the critical temperature is controlled not only by the energy VII. CONCLUSION. of the changed boson, w0, and the effective electron- phonon coupling (given by the product of the density of In this work we have presented the breakdown of the states times the electron-phonon coupling constant) but Eliashberg theory for H3S, in fact the electronic struc- also by the condensation energy. While in the standard ture of sulfur hydrides H3S with Im3m lattice structure Eliashberg theory, the correction to the chemical poten- as function of pressure shows Lifshitz transitions revealed tial induced by electron-phonon coupling is ignored on the verge of the Lifshitz transition this correction, which by band crossings at EF and by the shift of the narrow peak in the density of states below the chemical potential has much impact, is considered in the Multi-gaps BCS- pushed above it by lattice fluctuations associated with BEC Crossover theory. In this situation the chemical the hydrogen zero point motion. We have discussed the shift from the normal to the condensed phase below Tc presence of two topological Lifshitz transitions at two is no more negligible, and the coupling should be renormalized by a factor, given by the quantum overlap of critical pressures Pc1 = 110 Gpa, and Pc2 = 175 GPa by pressure dependent electronic structure calculations the condensed pairs in cuprates [46, 49, 50, 87] diborides [72, 77, 79] and iron based superconductirs[90–96]. of H3S. At the first Lifshitz transition, around Pc1 = 110 Gpa, three new Fermi surface spots appear at the γ point Finally this paper shows the breakdown of Eliash- pushed up by pressure. These anisotropic bands are char- berg theory for pressurized hydrides, supports the role acterized by a flat dispersion in the Γ − M direction and of phonons [10, 15–19] but the presence of Lifshitz tran- a steep dispersion in the Γ − R direction. The second sitions tuned by pressure need the use of the Multi-gaps Lifshitz transition at Pc2 = 180 GPa is due a new where BCS-BEC Crossover theory including shape resonances. the experimental critical temperature is nearly constant. Further work is needed to investigate i) the divergent 9 amplitude of lattice fluctuations near the R3m to Im3m discovery of superconductivity in sulfur hydrates very 2nd order structural transition around 180 GPa, ii) the near room temperature has narrowed the number of pos- large mass difference between H an S which requires the sible road maps toward new functional superconducting consideration of different amplitudes of u for the two materials. Further fundamental research on the mech- types of atoms, and it should allow for E and k depen- anism of room temperature superconductivity in these dences for the energy fluctuations of Lifshitz transitions. new phase of matter are needed to clarify this emerging The electronic band calculations should be extended to physical scenario and they will allow the definition of a large supercells needed for more precise estimates of en- protocol for the material design of new functional room ergy fluctuations of the electronic structure associated temperature superconductors. with spacial structural fluctuations. We think that the

[1] A.P. Drozdov, M.I. Eremets, I.A. Troyan, Conven- (26 Jan 2015) tional superconductivity at 190 K at high pressures. [14] Shoutao Zhang, Yanchao Wang, Jurong Zhang, Hanyu Preprint arXiv:1412.0460, (1 December 2014) URL Liu, Xin Zhong, Hai-Feng Song, Guochun Yang, Li- http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.0460. jun Zhang, Yanming Ma Phase Diagram and High- [2] A.P. Drozdov, M.I. Eremets, I.A. Troyan, V. Kseno- Temperature Superconductivity of Compressed Sele- fontov, S.I. Shylin, Conventional superconductivity nium Hydrides preprint arXiv:1502.02607 (9 Feb. 2015) at 203 K at high pressures. Nature on-line (2015) [15] D. Papaconstantopoulos, B.M. Klein, M.J. Mehl, W.E. doi:10.1038/nature14964 Pickett, Cubic H3S around 200 GPa: an atomic hydro- [3] M.I. Eremets in ”Superstripes 2015” A. Bianconi (ed.) gen superconductor stabilized by sulfur Phys. Rev. B Science Series Vol. 6, p.286 (Superstripes Press, Rome, 91, 184511 (2015). 2015) ISBN:9788866830382. [16] I. Errea, M. Calandra, C. J. Pickard, J. Nelson, R. J. [4] E. Cartlidge, Superconductivity record bolstered by Needs, Y. Li, H. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Ma, F. Mauri Hydro- magnetic data. Nature (29 June 2015), ISSN 1476-4687, gen sulphide at high pressure: a strongly-anharmonic doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17870 phonon-mediated superconductor Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, [5] Xin Zhong, Hui Wang, Jurong Zhang, Hanyu Liu, 157004 (2015). Shoutao Zhang, Hai-Feng Song, Guochun Yang, Li- [17] N. Bernstein, C.S. Hellberg, M.D. Johannes, I.I. Mazin, jun Zhang, Yanming Ma, Tellurium hydrides at high M.J. Mehl, What superconducts in sulfur hydrides un- pressures: high-temperature superconductors. preprint der pressure, and why Phys. Rev. B 91, 060511 (2015). arXiv:1503.00396 (march 2015) [18] A. P. Durajski, R. Szczesniak, Y. Li, Non-BCS thermo- [6] Changbo Chen, Fubo Tian, Defang Duan, et al. Pres- dynamic properties of H2S superconductor: Supercon- sure induced phase transition in MH2 (M = V, Nb). ductivity and its Applications 515, 1-6(2015) The Journal of Chemical Physics, 140, 114703 (2014). [19] R. Akashi, M. Kawamura, S. Tsuneyuki, Y. Nomura, [7] Pugeng Hou, Xiusong Zhao, Fubo Tian, et al. High pres- and R. Arita First-principles study of the pressure and sure structures and superconductivity of AlH3S (H2) crystal-structure dependences of the superconducting predicted by first principles. RSC Adv. 5, 5096-5101 transition temperature in compressed sulfur hydrides. (2015). Phys. Rev. B, 91, 224513 (2015) [8] L. Paulatto, I. Errea, M. Calandra, F. Mauri First- [20] J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio Hole superconductivity in principles calculations of phonon frequencies, lifetimes H2S and other sulfides under high pressure. Physica and spectral functions from weak to strong anharmonic- C: Superconductivity and its Applications 511, 45-49 ity: the example of palladium hydrides Phys. Rev. B, (2015). 91, 054304 (2015). [21] N. W. Ashcroft, Metallic hydrogen: a high-temperature [9] Yanhui Liu, Fubo Tian, Xilian Jin, et al. Near-edge X- superconductor? Physical Review Letters 21, 1748 ray absorption fine structure of solid oxygen under high (1968) pressure: A density functional theory study. Solid State [22] V. L. Ginzburg and D. A. Kirzhnitz, High temperature Communications, 147, 126-129 (2008). superconductivity. Consultants Bureau, Plenum Press, [10] D. Duan, Y. Liu, F. Tian, et al., Pressure-induced met- (New York, 1982). allization of dense (H2S)2H2 with high-Tc superconduc- [23] C. F. Richardson and N. W. Ashcroft High tempera- tivity. Sci. Rep. 4, 6968 (2014). ture superconductivity in metallic hydrogen: electron- [11] A. O. Lyakhov, A. R. Oganov, H.T. Stokes, Q. Zhu, electron enhancements Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 118 (1997) New developments in evolutionary structure prediction [24] E. G. Maksimov and Savrasov, Lattice stability and su- algorithm USPEX. Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1172 perconductivity of the metallic hydrogen at high pres- (2013). sure. Solid State Communications 119, 569 (2001) [12] D. Duan, X. Huang, F. Tian, D. Li, H. Yu, Y. Liu, Y. [25] N. W. Ashcroft, Hydrogen Dominant Metallic Alloys: Ma, B. Liu, and T. Cui, Pressure-induced decomposi- High Temperature Superconductors? Physical Review tion of solid hydrogen sulfide. Phys. Rev.B 91, 180502 Letters 92, 187002 (2004) (2015). [26] N. W. Ashcroft, Symmetry and higher superconductiv- [13] Jos A. Flores-Livas, Antonio Sanna, E.K.U. Gross High ity in the lower elements. In Bianconi, A. (ed.) Symme- temperature superconductivity in sulfur and selenium try and Heterogeneity in High Temperature Supercon- hydrides at high pressure preprint arXiv:1501.06336v1 ductors. vol. 214 of NATO Science Series II: Mathemat- 10

ics, Physics and Chemistry, 3-20 (Springer Netherlands, 181 (1996) 2006). [47] A. Valletta, G. Bardelloni, M. Brunelli, A. Lanzara, [27] E. Babaev, A. Sudbo, N. W. Ashcroft A superconductor A. Bianconi, and N. L. Saini, Journal of Super- to superfluid phase transition in liquid metallic hydro- conductivity 10, 383 (1997). ISSN 0896-1107, URL gen. Nature 431, 666-668 (2004) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02765723. [28] E. G. Maksimov and O. V. Dolgov, A note on the possi- [48] A. Valletta, A. Bianconi, A. Perali, and N. L. Saini, ble mechanisms of high-temperature superconductivity. Zeitschrift fur Physik B Condensed Matter 104, 707 Physics-Uspekhi 40, 933 (2007). (1997). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002570050513. [29] Kazutaka Abe, N. W. Ashcroft Quantum disproportion- [49] A. Bianconi, A. Valletta, A. Perali, N.L. Saini, Super- ation: The high hydrides at elevated pressures. Phys. conductivity of a striped phase at the atomic limit. Rev. B, 88, 174110 (2013). Physica C: Superconductivity 296, 269 (1998). [30] J. Bardeen, L.N. Cooper, J.R. Schrieffer Theory of Su- [50] A. Bianconi, Shape resonances in multi-condensate perconductivity Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957) granular superconductors formed by networks of [31] A. B. Migdal, Interaction between electrons and lat- nanoscale-striped puddles, Journal of Physics: Confer- tice vibrations in a normal metal Soviet Physics JETP ence Series 449, 012002 (2013). (Engl. Transl.);(United States) 34, 996 (1958) [51] M. Greiner, C. A. Regal, D. S. Jin, Emergence of a [32] W. L. McMillan, Transition temperature of Strong- molecular Bose Einstein condensate from a Fermi gas, Coupled superconductors. Physical Review 167, 331-344 Nature 426, 537-540 (2003). (1968). [52] A. Perali, P. Pieri, L. Pisani, G. C. Strinati, BCS-BEC [33] R. C. Dynes, McMillan’s equation and Crossover at Finite Temperature for Superfluid Trapped the Tc of superconductors. Solid State Fermi Atoms Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 220404 (2004). Communications 10, 615-618 (1972). URL [53] P. Turner and L. Nottale, The origins of macroscopic http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(72)90603-5. quantum coherence in high temperature superconduc- [34] G. M. Eliashberg, Interactions between electrons and tivity Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applica- lattice vibrations in a superconductor. Sov. Phys.-JETP tions 515, 15 (2015) (Engl. Transl.);(United States) 11.3 (1960). [54] M. A. Continentino, I. T. Padilha, and H. Caldas, Mech- [35] N.N. Bogoliubov. D. V. Shirkov, V.V. Tolmachev, A anism for enhancement of superconductivity in multi- new method in the superconductivity theory Akad. band systems with odd parity hybridization. Journal Nauk. SSSR Moscow, 1958; and Fortschr. Physik 6, 605 of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2014, (1958) P07015+ (2014). [36] L. P. Gor’kov, Developing BCS ideas in the former So- [55] G. Campi et al. Inhomogeneity of charge density wave viet Union, in: BCS: 50 YEARS, edited by Leon N and quenched disorder in a high Tc superconductor Na- Cooper and Dmitri Feldman, World Scientific, (2011) ture (2015). doi: 10.1038/nature14987 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 24, 3835 (2010). [56] A. Bianconi, S. Agrestini, G. Bianconi, D. Di Castro, [37] J. M. Blatt Theory of Superconductivity, Academic N.L. Saini, A quantum phase transition driven by the Press, New York (1964) electron lattice interaction gives high Tc superconduc- [38] James F. Annett Superconductivity, Superfluids and tivity. Journal of alloys and compounds 317, 537-541 Condensates, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004 (2001). [39] B. V. Svistunov, E.S. Babaev, N. V. Prokof’ev Super- [57] G. Bianconi, Superconductor-insulator transition on an- fluid States of Matter CRC Press, 2015 nealed complex networks. Physical Review E 85, 061113 [40] B.D. Josephson, Possible new effects in superconductive (2012) tunelling, Physics Letters 1, 251 (1962) [58] G. R. Stewart, Superconductivity in the A15 structure. [41] A. J. Leggett, in Modern Trends in the Theory of Con- Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications 514, densed Matter, edited by by A. Pekalski and R. Przys- 28 (2015). tawa, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 115 (Springer- [59] J. Friedel, Phase transitions, electron-phonon couplings Verlag, Berlin, 1980), p. 13. in perfect crystals modulated structures. in ”Electron- [42] A. Bianconi, On the Possibility of New High Tc Super- Phonon Interactions and Phase Transitions” Springer conductors by Producing Metal Heterostructures as in Science & Business Media, NATO Advanced Study In- the Cuprate Perovskites. Solid State Communications stitute (1977). 89, 933 (1994). [60] S. Bariic, J. Labb, and J. Friedel Tight Binding and [43] A. Bianconi, On the Fermi liquid coupled with a gener- Transition-Metal Superconductivity Phys. Rev. Lett. alized Wigner polaronic CDW giving high Tc supercon- 25, 919 (1970), ductivity Solid State Communications 91, 1 (1994), [61] T. Jarlborg and G. Arbman, The electronic structure of [44] A. Bianconi, The instability close to the 2D general- some A15 compounds by semiself-consistent band cal- ized wigner polaron crystal density: A possible pairing culations J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 7, 1635, (1977). mechanism indicated by a key experiment Physica C: [62] B. M. Klein, L. L. Boyer, D. A. Papacon- Superconductivity 235-240, 269 (1994) stantopoulos, Superconducting properties of A15 [45] A. Bianconi and M. Missori, The instability of a 2D elec- compounds derived from Band-Structure results. tron gas near the critical density for a Wigner polaron Physical Review Letters 42, 530-533 (1979). URL crystal giving the quantum state of cuprate supercon- http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.42.530. ductors Solid State Communications 91, 287 (1994). [63] T. Jarlborg, A. Junod and M. Peter, Electronic struc- [46] A. Perali, A. Bianconi, A. Lanzara and N.l. Saini The ture, superconductivity, and spin fluctuations in the Gap Amplification at the Shape Resonance in a super- A15 compounds A3B, B: A=V, Nb; B=Ir,Pt,Au, Phys. lattice of quantum stripes. Solid State Commun. 100, Rev. B27, 1558, (1983). 11

[64] W. L. McMillan, Superconductivity, and martensitic Parisiades, D. Lampakis, E. Liarokapis, and A. Bian- transformations in A-15 compounds in Electron-Phonon coni, Isotope effect on the E2g phonon and mesoscopic Interactions and Phase Transitions, Springer Science phase separation near the electronic topological transi- & Business Media, NATO Advanced Study Institute tion in Mg1−xAlxB2. Phys. Rev. B 80, 014520 (2009). (1977). [79] D. Innocenti, N. Poccia, A. Ricci, A. Valletta, S. [65] L. R. Testardi, Structural phase transitions, supercob- Caprara, A. Perali, A. Bianconi, Resonant and crossover ductivity in A15 compounds in ”Electron-Phonon Inter- phenomena in a multiband superconductor: Tuning the actions and Phase Transitions” Springer Science & Busi- chemical potential near a band edge. Phys. Rev. B 82, ness Media, NATO Advanced Study Institute (1977). 184528 (2010). [66] L. R. Testardi, Structural instability and superconduc- [80] Q. Chen, J. Stajic, S. Tan, and K. Levin, BCS-BEC tivity in A-15 compounds. Reviews of Modern Physics crossover: From high temperature superconductors to 47, 637 (1975) ultracold superfluids. Physics Reports 412, 1 (2005), [67] M. Takeda, H. Yoshida, H. Endoh, and H. Hashimoto, [81] A. Perali, P. Pieri, and G.C. Strinati, Quantitative com- High resolution electron microscope observations of mi- parison between theoretical predictions and experimen- crostructures in a15 type Nb3X superconductors. Jour- tal results for the BCS-BEC crossover. Phys. Rev. Lett. nal of Microscopy 151, 147-157 (1988). 93, 100404 (2004). [68] M. Arita, H. U. Nissen, Y. Kitano, and W. Schauer, [82] I. M. Lifshitz, Anomalies of electron characteristics of a Electron Microscopy of Planar Defects in A15 Nb3Ge. metal in the high pressure region Sov. Phys. JETP 11, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 107, 76 (1993) 1130 (1960). [69] N. L. Saini, M. Filippi, Z. Wu, H. Oyanagi, H. Ihara, [83] A. Varlamov, V. Edorov, A. Pantsulaya, Kinetic prop- A. Iyo, S. Agrestini, and A. Bianconi, A study of the erties of metals near electronic topological transitions Nb3Ge system by Ge K-edge extended x-ray absorption (2 1/2 order transitions) Advances in Physics 38, 469 fine structure and x-ray absorption near-edge structure (1989). spectroscopy Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 14, [84] K. I. Kugel, A. L. Rakhmanov, A. O. Sboychakov, 13543 (2002) Nicola Poccia, and Antonio Bianconi Model for phase [70] A. Bianconi, D. Di Castro, S. Agrestini, G. Campi, separation controlled by doping and the internal chem- N. L. Saini, A. Saccone, S. De Negri, and M. ical pressure in different cuprate superconductors Phys. Giovannini, A superconductor made by a metal Rev. B 78, 165124 (2008) heterostructure at the atomic limit tuned at the [85] A. Bianconi, N. Poccia, A. O. Sboychakov, A. ‘shape resonance’: MgB2 Journal of Physics: Con- L. Rakhmanov and K. I. Kugel, Intrinsic arrested densed Matter 13, 7383 (2001). ISSN 0953-8984, URL nanoscale phase separation near a topological Lifshitz http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/13/33/318. transition in strongly correlated two-band metals. Su- [71] H. Suhl, B. T. Matthias, and L. R. Walker, Bardeen- percond. Sci. Technol. 28, 024005 (2015). Cooper-Schrieffer Theory of Superconductivity in the [86] A. Guidini and A. Perali, Band-edge BCS-BEC Case of Overlapping Bands Physical Review Letters 3, crossover in a two-band superconductor: physical prop- 552 (1959). erties and detection parameters. Supercond. Sci. Tech- [72] G. A. Ummarino, R. S. Gonnelli, S. Massidda, and A. nol. 27, 124002 (2014). Bianconi, Two-band Eliashberg equations and the ex- [87] A. Bianconi, Feshbach shape resonance in multiband perimental Tc of the diboride Mg1−xAlxB2. Physica C: superconductivity in heterostructures. Journal of Super- Superconductivity 407, 121 (2004). conductivity 18, 625 (2005). [73] H. J. Choi, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Anisotropic [88] A. Perali, D. Innocenti, A. Valletta, and A. Bianconi, Eliashberg theory and the two-band model for the su- Anomalous isotope effect near a 2.5 lifshitz transition in perconducting properties of MgB2. Physical Review B a multi-band multi-condensate superconductor Super- 73, 104520 (2006). conductor Science and Technology 25, 124002 (2012). [74] A. Bianconi, D. Di Castro, S. Agrestini, G. Campi, N. [89] D. Innocenti and A. Bianconi, Isotope Effect at the Fano L. Saini, A. Saccone, S. De Negri, M. Giovannini, A Resonance in Superconducting Gaps for Multiband Su- superconductor made by a metal heterostructure at the perconductors at a 2.5 Lifshitz Transition. J Supercond atomic limit tuned at the ’shape resonance’: MgB2. Nov Magn 26, 1319 (2013). Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 13, 7383 (2001). [90] R. Caivano, et al. Feshbach resonance and mesoscopic [75] T. Yildirim, O. Glseren, J. W. Lynn, C. M. Brown, T. phase separation near a quantum critical point in multi- J. Udovic, Q. Huang, N. Rogado, K. A. Regan, M. A. band FeAs-based superconductors, Superconductor Sci- Hayward, J. S. Slusky, et al., Giant Anharmonicity and ence and Technology 22, 014004 (2009). Nonlinear Electron-Phonon Coupling in MgB2: A Com- [91] D. Innocenti, A. Valletta, A. Bianconi, Shape Reso- bined First-Principles Calculation and Neutron Scatter- nance at a Lifshitz Transition for High Temperature ing Study Physical Review Letters 87 037001 (2001). Superconductivity in Multiband Superconductor, Jour- [76] L. Boeri, E. Cappelluti, and L. Pietronero, Small Fermi nal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism 24, 1137 energy, zero-point fluctuations, and nonadiabaticity in (2011). MgB2 Physical Review B 71, 012501 (2005). [92] A. Bianconi, Quantum Materials: Shape Resonances in [77] G. Campi, E. Cappelluti, T. Proffen, X. Qiu, E. S. Superstripes Nature Physics 9, 536 (2013). Bozin, Billinge, S. Agrestini, N. L. Saini, and A. Bian- [93] A. A. Kordyuk, et al. Electronic band structure of coni, Study of temperature dependent atomic correla- ferro-pnictide superconductors from ARPES experi- tions in MgB2. The European Physical Journal B - Con- ment Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Mag- densed Matter and Complex Systems, 52, 15 (2006). netism 26, 2837 (2013) [78] L. Simonelli, V. Palmisano, M. Fratini, M. Filippi, P. [94] A. A. Kordyuk, Pseudogap from ARPES experiment: 12

Three gaps in cuprates and topological superconductiv- tion in Ce from temperature-dependent band-structure ity. Low Temperature Physics 41, 319-341 (2015). calculations Phys. Rev. B 55, 1288, (1997). [95] C. Liu, et al., Importance of the Fermi-surface topology [107] E.G. Moroni, G. Grimvall and T. Jarlborg, Free Energy to the superconducting state of the electron-doped pnic- Contributions to the hcp-bcc Transformation in Transi- tide Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2 Physical Review B 84, 020509 tion Metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2758, (1996). (2011) [108] T. Jarlborg and A. Bianconi, Fermi surface reconstruc- [96] S. Ideta, T. Yoshida, I. Nishi, A. Fujimori, Y. Kotani, tion of superoxygenated La2Cu O3superconductors K. Ono, Y. Nakashima, S. Yamaichi, T. Sasagawa, M. with ordered oxygen interstitials, Phys. Rev. B 87, Nakajima, K. Kihou, Y. Tomioka, C. H. Lee, A. Iyo, H. 054514, (2013). Eisaki, T. Ito, S. Uchida, and R. Arita, Dependence of [109] D. Pettifor, Theory of energy bands and related proper- Carrier Doping on the Impurity Potential in Transition- ties of 4d-transition metals. II. The electron-phonon ma- Metal-Substituted FeAs-Based Superconductors, Phys. trix element, superconductivity and ion core enhance- Rev. Lett. 110, 107007 (2013) ment, J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 7, 1009, (1977). [97] S. V. Borisenko et al. Direct observation of spin-orbit [110] G.D. Gaspari and B.L. Gyorffy, Electron-Phonon Inter- coupling in iron-based superconductors. preprint (2014) actions, d Resonances, and Superconductivity in Tran- arXiv:1409.8669 sition Metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 801, (1972). [98] Khandker Quader, Michael Widom Lifshitz Transi- [111] M. Dacorogna, T. Jarlborg, A. Junod, M. Pelizzone tions in 122-Pnictides Under Pressure preprint (2014) and M. Peter, Electronic structure and low-temperature arXiv:1401.7349 properties of V(x)Nb(1-x)N alloys J. Low Temp. Phys. [99] A. Charnukha et al. Interaction-induced singular Fermi 57, 629, (1984). surface in a high-temperature oxypnictide. supercon- [112] T. Jarlborg, Electronic structure and properties of pure ductor. Scientific Reports 5, 10392 (2015) and doped epsilon-FeSi from ab initio local-density the- [100] S. L. Bud’ko, G. Lapertot, C. Petrovic, C. E. Cunning- ory, Phys. Rev. B59, 15002, (1999). ham, N. Anderson, P. C. Canfield Boron Isotope Effect [113] T. Jarlborg, P. Chudzinski and T. Giamarchi, Effects in Superconducting MgB2, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 1877 of thermal and spin fluctuations on the band structure (2001). of purple bronze Li2Mo12O34 Phys. Rev. B85, 235108, [101] T. Jarlborg, A. Bianconi, in preparation (2015) (2012). [102] O.K. Andersen, Linear methods in band theory, Phys. [114] T. Jarlborg, Role of thermal disorder for magnetism Rev. B12, 3060 (1975). and the α-γ transition in cerium: Results from density- [103] B. Barbiellini, S.B. Dugdale and T. Jarlborg, The functional theory, Phys. Rev. B89, 184426 (2014). EPMD-LMTO program for electronpositron momen- [115] T. Jarlborg, Electronic structure and properties of su- tum density calculations in solids, Comput. Mater. Sci. perconducting materials with simple Fermi surfaces J. 28, 287 (2003). of Supercond. and Novel Magn., 28, 1231 (2014) DOI: [104] O. Gunnarsson and B.I. Lundquist, Exchange and cor- 10.1007/s 10948-014-2897-1 relation in atoms, molecules, and solids by the spin- [116] G. Grimvall, Thermophysical properties of materials. density-functional formalism Phys. Rev. B 13, 4274 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986). (1976). [117] T. Jarlborg, A model of the T-dependent pseudogap [105] T. Jarlborg, A.A. Manuel and M. Peter, Experimental and its competition with superconductivity in copper and theoretical determination of the Fermi surface of oxides, Solid State Commun. 151, 639, (2011). V3Si, Phys. Rev. B27, 4210, (1983). [106] T. Jarlborg, E.G. Moroni and G. Grimvall, α γ transi-