DOCSLIB.ORG

Island Foxes the Evolution, Behavioural Ecology, and Conservation of Island Foxes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Island Foxes the Evolution, Behavioural Ecology, and Conservation of Island Foxes Zubir-09.qxd 5/13/04 11:37 AM Page 173 CHAPTER 9 Island foxes The evolution, behavioural ecology, and conservation of island foxes Gary W. Roemer A yearling, male Santa Cruz island fox just Urocyon littoralis santacruzae prior to dispersal © G. Roemer. The island fox is (Urocyon littoralis) endemic to the currently recognized as a distinct subspecies, and California Channel Islands, a continental archipel- both the hypothesized colonization scheme and the ago located off the coast of the southwestern United current taxonomic classification are supported by States. A descendent of the mainland gray fox morphological and genetic evidence. (U. cinereo argenteus), it is hypothesized that island An insular existence has had a profound influence foxes first colonized the three northern Channel on the evolution, ecology, and genetic structure of Islands (Santa Cruz, Santa Rosa, and San Miguel) by island foxes. A dwarf form of the gray fox, island chance over-water dispersal. Native Americans then foxes are the smallest canid in North America. transported foxes from these islands to three south- Compared to mainland canids of similar size, island ern Channel Islands (Santa Catalina, San Clemente, foxes have shorter dispersal distances (mean ϭ and San Nicolas). Each island fox population is 1.39 km, SD ϭ 1.26, range ϭ 0.16–3.58 km, n ϭ 8), Zubir-09.qxd 5/13/04 11:37 AM Page 174 174 Biology and conservation of wild canids a smaller average home range size (mean annual home nature would bring a handsome price. Limú, of the range ϭ 0.55 km2, SD ϭ 0.2, n ϭ 14) and higher Chumash Indians of Santa Cruz Island was about to population densities (2.4–15.9 foxes/km2). Although introduce an animal that the Gabrielino Indians of they are distributed as socially monogamous pairs, Santa Catalina Island had never seen. The Gabrielino island foxes are not completely monogamous. Extra- were about to meet the island fox. pair fertilizations (EPFs) accounted for 25% of all Although fictional, this scene may well depict how offspring whose parents were determined through island foxes colonized the southern most Channel paternity analysis. This relatively high rate of EPFs Islands, a continental archipelago located off the may be related to high population density and the coast of southern California, USA (Fig. 9.1). proximity of suitable partners other than social Archaeological, ethnographic, morphological, and mates. Finally, the genetic gradient among fox popu- genetic evidence support the contention that foxes lations appears steeper than mainland populations were brought to the southern Channel Islands (Santa suggesting that smaller dispersal distances on islands Catalina, San Clemente, and San Nicolas) by Native result in increased population structure. Americans between 2,200 and 5,200 YBP (Collins An insular existence coupled with small popula- 1991a,b, 1993; Wayne et al. 1991b; Vellanoweth tion size may have also increased the vulnerability of 1998). Native Americans of the Channel Islands har- the island fox to extinction. Over the past decade, vested foxes to make arrow-quivers, capes, and head- five of the six subspecies have declined and two are dresses from their pelts, they ceremonially buried extinct in the wild. Factors contributing to these foxes, conducted an Island Fox Dance and most likely declines include predation by golden eagles (Aquila kept foxes as pets or semi-domesticates (Collins chrysaetos), the introduction of canine distemper 1991b). Island foxes played a prominent role in the virus and predator control efforts aimed at control- ling foxes to protect an endangered bird. A multi- faceted conservation strategy that includes the N 50 km live-capture and removal of golden eagles, the vacci- Northern Channel Islands nation of foxes against canine distemper virus, the SMI Los Angeles eradication of feral herbivores and the captive prop- SRO SCZ California agation of island foxes is currently underway to avert the impending extinction of this endemic canid. SCA Southern Channel Islands SNI Introduction SCL The bow sliced through the calm waters of the bay and then quietly slid to a stop on the gently sloping Santa Cruz Island beach. Limú was glad the journey was half over. The Fraser Point crossing from Santa Cruz Island to this sheltered bay Central Valley at the west end of Santa Catalina Island had been rough. The swells were half as tall as his tamal was long, and more than once he had felt they would lose 20 km their cargo. Their safety was critical to the success Figure 9.1 Island foxes occur on the six largest California of his trading effort. He was sure they would fetch Channel Islands. The three northern islands are Santa Cruz a handsome price, perhaps a few steatite bowls, (SCZ), Santa Rosa (SRO), and San Miguel (SMI), and the soapstone cookware coveted by all the tribes of the three southern islands are Santa Catalina (SCA), San Channel Islands, or maybe several sea otter pelts. Clemente (SCL), and San Nicolas (SNI). The enlargement of Yes, indeed, he was sure these gentle creatures with Santa Cruz Island shows the relative placement and size their beautiful cinnamon, white and grey coats, their of two trapping grids, Fraser Point and Central Valley, which large hazel eyes, and their inquisitive and playful were used to capture island foxes. Zubir-09.qxd 5/13/04 11:37 AM Page 175 Island foxes 175 spiritual and personal lives of these island Americans. (Collins 1982; Moore and Collins 1995). Morphology Fossil evidence dates the arrival of foxes to the north- is so distinctive that each fox population can be dis- ern Channel Islands (Santa Cruz, Santa Rosa, and San tinguished from the other solely on osteological Miguel) much earlier, from 10,400 to 16,000 YBP (Orr traits. Using 29 cranial and mandibular characters 1968). Their actual colonization probably occurred measured from 2,207 island and gray fox specimens, between 18,000 and 40,000 years ago, when these Collins (1982, 1993) correctly classified 91% of all northern islands were joined into one large island island fox specimens to their island of origin. known as ‘Santarosae’ (Collins 1982, 1993; Johnson Insularity has also had a profound influence on 1983). At its closest, Santarosae was a mere 6 km from genetic diversity and the phylogeography of the the North American continent, having reached its island fox. Founder events, genetic drift, and selection maximum size 18,000–24,000 YBP. It is hypothesized have played significant roles reducing phenotypic that sometime during this period, mainland gray and genetic variation, and creating six genetically dis- foxes, the progenitor of the island fox, colonized tinct populations. Island foxes contain about 35% of Santarosae by chance over-water dispersal, by either the genetic variation observed in mainland grey foxes, swimming or by rafting on floating debris (Collins and the fox population on San Nicolas Island is one of 1982, 1993). As glaciers retreated and sea levels rose, the most genetically invariant wild populations Santarosae was subdivided into separate islands. Santa known (Table 9.1). Genotype profiles generated from Cruz Island was formed first, some 11,500 YBP. Sea lev- hypervariable minisatellite and microsatellite DNA els continued to rise separating the remaining land were identical for all foxes assayed from San Nicolas mass once again, approximately 9,500 YBP, to form (Gilbert et al. 1990; Goldstein et al. 1999). Of the five Santa Rosa and San Miguel Islands. Native Americans then colonized the Channel Islands 9,000–10,000 YBP, and after establishment of an extensive trade Table 9.1 Genetic diversity at 19 microsatellite loci in route, transported foxes to the southern islands. the island fox and a mainland California population of gray fox Alleles/ % The island syndrome Population n locus Polymorphic He HW-He In general, insular populations differ from their main- San Miguel 17.8 1.7 47.4 0.106 0.155 land counterparts in aspects of form, genetics, (0.8) (0.2) (0.045) (0.048) demography, and behaviour. They may be dwarfed or Santa Rosa 25.4 2.5 57.9 0.198 0.274 gigantic, they typically have lower levels of genetic (0.9) (0.4) (0.056) (0.065) diversity, occur at higher densities, have decreased Santa Cruz 22.4 2.3 57.9 0.209 0.284 dispersal tendencies, and reduced aggression (Stamps (1.1) (0.3) (0.047) (0.058) and Buechner 1985; Adler and Levins 1994; Burness San Nicolas 26.4 1.0 0 0 0 et al. 2001). Island foxes are no exception. A dwarf (0.9) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) form of the mainland gray fox, island foxes are the San Clemente 24.9 2.1 52.6 0.228 0.248 smallest North American canid, varying in body mass (1.1) (0.3) (0.061) (0.064) from 1.4 to 2.5 kg, roughly two-thirds the size of a Santa Catalina 25.4 2.5 89.5 0.341 0.405 mainland grey fox (Moore and Collins 1995; Roemer (1.1) (0.2) (0.046) (0.043) et al. in press). Further, each insular population differs Grey fox 11.9 6.3 94.7 0.700 0.752 in body mass and morphology (Collins 1982, 1993; (0.6) (0.5) (0.045) (0.047) Wayne et al. 1991; Roemer et al. in press). For example, Santa Catalina has the largest island foxes (U. littoralis Note: The San Nicolas island fox population is genetically invariant at all catalinae), San Clemente’s foxes (U. littoralis clementae) loci. n: mean sample size per locus (ϮSD); Alleles/locus: mean number have the smallest craniums and San Miguel foxes of alleles per locus; % Polymorphic: the percentage of loci that had two or (U.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pygmy Hog – 1 Southern Ningaul – 16 Kowari – 9 Finlayson's Squirrel
    Pygmy Hog – 1 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Southern Ningaul – 16 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Kowari – 9 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Finlayson’s Squirrel – 8 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Kodkod – 5 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Least Chipmunk – 12 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Tree Hyrax – 4 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Bank Vole – 13 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Island Fox – 6 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Gray-bellied Caenolestid – 11 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Raccoon Dog – 3 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Northern Short-Tailed Shrew – 14 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Southern African Hedgehog - 7 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Collard Pika - 10 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Pudu – 2 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Seba’s Short-tailed Bat – 15 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Pygmy Spotted Skunk - 16 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Grandidier’s “Mongoose” - 16 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Sloth Bear - 1 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Spotted Linsing - 9 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Red Panda - 8 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size European Badger – 5 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Giant Forest Genet – 12 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size African Civet – 4 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Kinkajou – 13 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense: Size Fossa – 6 Habitat: Diurnal/Nocturnal Defense:
    [Show full text]
  • Double Allee Effects and Extinction in the Island Fox
    Double Allee Effects and Extinction in the Island Fox ELENA ANGULO,∗†† GARY W. ROEMER,† LUDEKˇ BEREC,‡ JOANNA GASCOIGNE,§ AND FRANCK COURCHAMP∗ ∗Ecologie, Syst´ematique et Evolution, UMR CNRS 8079, University of Paris-Sud, Orsay Cedex 91405, France †Department of Fishery and Wildlife Sciences, New Mexico State University, P.O. Box 30003, MSC 4901, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8003, U.S.A. ‡Department of Theoretical Ecology, Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre ASCR, Braniˇsovsk´a 31, 37005 Cesk´ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic §School of Ocean Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, LL59 5AB, United Kingdom Abstract: An Allee effect (AE) occurs in populations when individuals suffer a decrease in fitness at low densities. If a fitness component is reduced (component AE), per capita population growth rates may decline as a consequence (demographic AE) and extinction risk is increased. The island fox (Urocyon littoralis)is endemic to six of the eight California Channel Islands. Population crashes have coincided with an increase in predation by Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos). We propose that AEs could render fox populations more sensitive and may be a likely explanation for their sharp decline. We analyzed demographic data collected between 1988 and 2000 to test whether fox density (1) influences survival and reproductive rates; (2) interacts with eagle presence and affects fox fitness parameters; and (3) influences per capita fox population trends. A double component AE simultaneously influenced survival (of adults and pups) and proportion of breeding adult females. The adult survival AE was driven by predation by eagles. These component AEs led to a demographic AE.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recovery Plan for Four Subspecies of Island Fox (Urocyon Littoralis)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Draft Recovery Plan for Four Subspecies of Island Fox (Urocyon littoralis) Island fox. Daniel Richards, used with permission. Draft Recovery Plan for Four Subspecies of Island Fox Draft Recovery Plan for Four Subspecies of Island Fox (Urocyon littoralis) (May 2012) Region 8 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento, California Approved: _____________________________________________________________ Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, Region 8 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: Draft Recovery Plan for Four Subspecies of Island Fox Draft Recovery Plan for Four Subspecies of Island Fox DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect federally listed species. We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, publish recovery plans, sometimes preparing them with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than our own. They represent our official position only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Notice of Copyrighted Material Permission to use copyrighted illustrations and images in the draft version of this recovery plan has been granted by the copyright holders. These illustrations are not placed in the public domain by their appearance herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Fox Subspecies
    PETITION TO LIST FOUR ISLAND FOX SUBSPECIES San Miguel Island fox (U. l. littoralis) Santa Rosa Island fox (U. l. santarosae) Santa Cruz Island fox (U. l. santacruzae) Santa Catalina Island fox (U. l. catalinae) AS ENDANGERED SPECIES Center for Biological Diversity Institute for Wildlife Studies June 1, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Notice of Petition ..............................................................1 Executive Summary ...........................................................2 Systematics Species Description ...........................................................4 Taxonomy ..................................................................4 Distribution and Evolution .......................................................4 Significance .................................................................6 Natural History Habitat Use and Home Range ....................................................6 Food Habits .................................................................6 Social Organization ............................................................7 Reproduction ................................................................7 Survival and Mortality ..........................................................8 Competition With Other Species ..................................................9 Population Status and Trend San Miguel Island (U. l. littoralis) .................................................9 Santa Rosa Island (U. l. santarosae) .............................................10 Santa Cruz Island (U. l. santacruzae)
    [Show full text]
  • Aza Board & Staff
    The Perfect Package. Quality, Value and Convenience! Order online! Discover what tens of thousands of customers — including commercial reptile breeding facilities, veterinarians, and some of our country’s most respected zoos www.RodentPro.com and aquariums — have already learned: with Rodentpro.com®, you get quality It’s quick, convenient AND value! Guaranteed. and guaranteed! RodentPro.com® offers only the highest quality frozen mice, rats, rabbits, P. O . Box 118 guinea pigs, chickens and quail at prices that are MORE than competitive. Inglefield, IN 47618-9998 We set the industry standards by offering unsurpassed quality, breeder Tel: 812.867.7598 direct pricing and year-round availability. Fax: 812.867.6058 ® With RodentPro.com , you’ll know you’re getting exactly what you order: E-mail: [email protected] clean nutritious feeders with exact sizing and superior quality. And with our exclusive shipping methods, your order arrives frozen, not thawed. We guarantee it. ©2013 Rodentpro.com,llc. PRESORTED STANDARD U.S. POSTAGE American Association of PAID Zoological Parks And Aquariums Rockville, Maryland PERMIT #4297 8403 Colesville Road, Suite 710 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 (301) 562-0777 www.aza.org FORWARDING SERVICE REQUESTED MOVING? SEND OLD LABEL AND NEW ADDRESS DATED MATERIAL MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE 10TH CONNECT This Is Your Last Issue… Renew your AZA membership TODAY (see back panel for details) Connect with these valuable resources for Benefits Professional Associate, Professional Affiliate Available and Professional Fellow
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Predator
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PREDATOR DAMAGE MANAGEMENT IN THE UVALDE DISTRICT OF TEXAS Prepared by: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE WILDLIFE SERVICES in cooperation with: TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE EXTENSION SERVICE OF THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM November 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................................................. iii CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION 1.1 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 NEED FOR ACTION ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 SCOPE OF THIS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................. 19 1.4 RELATIONSHIP OF THIS EA TO OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS .................................. 22 1.5 AUTHORITY OF FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES ........................................................................... 22 1.6 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND STATUTES ....................................................................................... 24 1.7 DECISIONS TO BE MADE ......................................................................................................................... 28 CHAPTER 2: ISSUES AND AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 2.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying the Foxes of North America
    Identifying the Foxes of North America fox coyote Species: gray fox island fox red fox kit fox swift fox arctic fox coyote EARS Rounded, no black Rounded, no black Pointy with black Relatively large Smaller rounded Small rounded ears Pointy, leaning tips tips tips ears ears outward MUZZLE Pointy, but shorter Short on a dainty Long and pointy Narrow Narrow Relatively short Long, slender and than red fox face pointy FUR (PELAGE) Cinnamon-rufous Cinnamon-rufous Reddish brown Grizzled to tawny Pale yellowish-red Winter phase - Grayish cinnamon, with white on the with white on the with white chest gray with buff and gray, with pure white; “blue” brown or a face, throat, belly face, throat, belly and upper lip highlights on neck, wide gray stripe phase in spring/ combination and hind legs and hind legs. Can (color can range sides and legs down back summer - dark to be somewhat from pale to black) dull slate gray darker overall TAIL Black tip Black tip White tip (always) Black tip Black tip Entirely one color Coloration varies SIZE 7–13 pounds 3–6 pounds 7–18 pounds 4–7 pounds 4–6 pounds 6–15 pounds 25–45 pounds Identifying Black stripe down Black stripe down Black tips on ears Tail is long and Only small fox on Changes coloring Dog like in Characteristics tail, generally back and tail, and black feet bushy; dens under- no. Great Plains; seasonally; only appearance and stocky with short diminutive size ground year-round dens underground fox found in high stance legs year-round arctic tundra HABITAT Southern Canada Found in the wild Across North Arid regions of CA Formerly the Great Arctic tundra from North America, to Central America; ONLY on six America; in every and US Southwest, Plains, reduced to Alaska across south of the tundra absent from Channel Islands of state, but absent into Mexico and western NB, KS, northern Canada to Central America northern Rockies So.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptile and Amphibian Enforcement Applicable Law Sections
    Reptile and Amphibian Enforcement Applicable Law Sections Environmental Conservation Law 11-0103. Definitions. As used in the Fish and Wildlife Law: 1. a. "Fish" means all varieties of the super-class Pisces. b. "Food fish" means all species of edible fish and squid (cephalopoda). c. "Migratory fish of the sea" means both catadromous and anadromous species of fish which live a part of their life span in salt water streams and oceans. d. "Fish protected by law" means fish protected, by law or by regulations of the department, by restrictions on open seasons or on size of fish that may be taken. e. Unless otherwise indicated, "Trout" includes brook trout, brown trout, red-throat trout, rainbow trout and splake. "Trout", "landlocked salmon", "black bass", "pickerel", "pike", and "walleye" mean respectively, the fish or groups of fish identified by those names, with or without one or more other common names of fish belonging to the group. "Pacific salmon" means coho salmon, chinook salmon and pink salmon. 2. "Game" is classified as (a) game birds; (b) big game; (c) small game. a. "Game birds" are classified as (1) migratory game birds and (2) upland game birds. (1) "Migratory game birds" means the Anatidae or waterfowl, commonly known as geese, brant, swans and river and sea ducks; the Rallidae, commonly known as rails, American coots, mud hens and gallinules; the Limicolae or shorebirds, commonly known as woodcock, snipe, plover, surfbirds, sandpipers, tattlers and curlews; the Corvidae, commonly known as jays, crows and magpies. (2) "Upland game birds" (Gallinae) means wild turkeys, grouse, pheasant, Hungarian or European gray-legged partridge and quail.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility and Strategies for Translocating San Joaquin Kit Foxes to Vacant Or Restored Habitats
    FEASIBILITY AND STRATEGIES FOR TRANSLOCATING SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOXES TO VACANT OR RESTORED HABITATS PREPARED FOR THE CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT CONSERVATION PROGRAM U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION AND U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE SACRAMENTO, CA 95825 Prepared by: Samantha Bremner-Harrison and Brian L. Cypher California State University, Stanislaus Endangered Species Recovery Program 1900 N. Gateway #101 Fresno, CA 93727 November 2007 FEASIBILITY AND STRATEGIES FOR REINTRODUCING SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOXES TO VACANT OR RESTORED HABITATS Samantha Bremner-Harrison and Brian L. Cypher California State University, Stanislaus Endangered Species Recovery Program TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ...............................................................................................................i 1. Introduction................................................................................................................... 1 2. Literature review of animal reintroductions and translocations ............................. 2 2.1. Introduction and definitions ............................................................................................. 2 2.2. Common issues associated with reintroduction programs............................................. 3 2.2.1. Expense....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.2. Available habitat ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pathogen Exposure in Endangered Island Fox (Urocyon Littoralis) Populations: Implications for Conservation Management
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 131 (2006) 230– 243 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Pathogen exposure in endangered island fox (Urocyon littoralis) populations: Implications for conservation management Deana L. Clifforda,*, Jonna A.K. Mazeta, Edward J. Dubovib, David K. Garcelonc, Timothy J. Coonand, Patricia A. Conrada, Linda Munsona aWildlife Health Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA bDiagnostic Laboratory, New York State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, PO Box 786, Ithaca, NY 14851, USA cInstitute for Wildlife Studies, PO Box 1104, Arcata, CA 95518, USA dNational Park Service, Channel Islands National Park, 1901 Spinnaker Drive, Ventura, CA 93001, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Island fox (Urocyon littoralis) populations on four California Channel Islands have declined Island fox severely since 1994. Canine distemper (CDV) was suspected to be responsible for the decline Urocyon littoralis of the Santa Catalina Island fox, so knowledge of infectious disease exposure in the remain- Canine diseases ing island fox populations was urgently needed. This study reviewed previous pathogen Canine distemper virus exposure in island foxes and investigated the current threat by conducting a serologic survey Serosurvey of foxes on all islands and sympatric feral cats on three islands from 2001 to 2003 for antibod- Feral cats ies against canid pathogens. Before the decline, foxes had evidence of exposure to CDV, canine adenovirus (CAV), canine parvovirus (CPV), and Toxoplasma, with exposure to these five pathogens differing greatly by island. Exposure to canine coronavirus (CCV), canine her- pesvirus (CHV), and Leptospira was rare. In 2001–2003, wild-born foxes had evidence of expo- sure to CDV (5.2–32.8%) on 5 of 6 islands, CPV (28–100%) and CAV (4.7–100%) on five islands, and Toxoplasma gondii (2.3–15.4%) on four islands.
    [Show full text]
  • List of 28 Orders, 129 Families, 598 Genera and 1121 Species in Mammal Images Library 31 December 2013
    What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library LIST OF 28 ORDERS, 129 FAMILIES, 598 GENERA AND 1121 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 DECEMBER 2013 AFROSORICIDA (5 genera, 5 species) – golden moles and tenrecs CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus – Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 4. Tenrec ecaudatus – Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (83 genera, 142 species) – paraxonic (mostly even-toed) ungulates ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BOVIDAE (46 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Impala 3. Alcelaphus buselaphus - Hartebeest 4. Alcelaphus caama – Red Hartebeest 5. Ammotragus lervia - Barbary Sheep 6. Antidorcas marsupialis - Springbok 7. Antilope cervicapra – Blackbuck 8. Beatragus hunter – Hunter’s Hartebeest 9. Bison bison - American Bison 10. Bison bonasus - European Bison 11. Bos frontalis - Gaur 12. Bos javanicus - Banteng 13. Bos taurus -Auroch 14. Boselaphus tragocamelus - Nilgai 15. Bubalus bubalis - Water Buffalo 16. Bubalus depressicornis - Anoa 17. Bubalus quarlesi - Mountain Anoa 18. Budorcas taxicolor - Takin 19. Capra caucasica - Tur 20. Capra falconeri - Markhor 21. Capra hircus - Goat 22. Capra nubiana – Nubian Ibex 23. Capra pyrenaica – Spanish Ibex 24. Capricornis crispus – Japanese Serow 25. Cephalophus jentinki - Jentink's Duiker 26. Cephalophus natalensis – Red Duiker 1 What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library 27. Cephalophus niger – Black Duiker 28. Cephalophus rufilatus – Red-flanked Duiker 29. Cephalophus silvicultor - Yellow-backed Duiker 30. Cephalophus zebra - Zebra Duiker 31. Connochaetes gnou - Black Wildebeest 32. Connochaetes taurinus - Blue Wildebeest 33. Damaliscus korrigum – Topi 34.
    [Show full text]
  • January 11, 2017 Honorable David E. Ryu Los Angeles City Council
    January 11, 2017 Honorable David E. Ryu Los Angeles City Council Room 1010, City Hall 200 North Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Dear Councilmember Ryu: With more than sixty accredited members, the Zoological Association of America (ZAA) is the second largest trade association in the zoological sector; counting among its members some of the finest facilities in the United States. As part of its core mission, ZAA accredits professional zoological facilities. ZAA accreditation is predicated on promoting the highest standards of animal welfare, as well as public and animal safety. Our accreditation standards meet or exceed all accepted industry standards and federal requirements. Our safety record is the best of any of the major zoological trade associations. (As a trusted source of industry information, a ZAA spokesperson was quoted extensively following the tragic incident at the Cincinnati Zoo this last summer.) We believe that any proposed ordinance banning public showings of animals for the benefit of audiences strikes at the heart of the most effective educational programs about the natural world that have yet been devised, and is poor public policy. It is clearly the agenda of animal rights activists and not that of parents who long for wholesome programs for their children. The people dedicating their livelihoods to display and education of animals are concerned that many endangered species are nearing extinction from poaching and destruction of habitats; and their only salvation is to inspire the citizenry to protect them. “Jungle Jack” Hanna, clearly one of ZAA’s best-known professional members, has been on television in major cities hundreds of times on the Today show, the Tonight show and many others, demonstrating the wide variety of animal life, and mostly with exotic animals.
    [Show full text]