Best Practices for Change Management in Supply Chain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Best Practices for Change Management in Supply Chain Best Practices for Change Management in Supply Chain Best Practices for Change Management in Supply Chain Most business leaders are well acquainted with the maxim, “Change is the only constant.” The events that kicked off this decade—ranging from the COVID-19 pandemic, to environmental disasters, to socio-economic conflicts, to second-day delivery, to localization—exponentially accelerated the rate at which the world is changing around us. Now more than ever, supply chain leaders are realizing that in order to keep pace with an ever-competitive industry, they will need to adapt or risk being left behind. While supply chain leaders are acutely aware of the need to adapt, they’re also painfully aware of the risks that go along with change. After all, change management is notoriously challenging to accomplish. Harvard Business Review says that 70% of change management efforts eventually fail.1 Moreover, because supply chain resources tend to be spread precariously thin to begin with, supply chain leaders are even more likely to balk at the mere thought of devoting time and energy to adopting a new path forward, especially during a time of heightened volatility. Fortunately, it is possible to update your supply chain without enduring the trials of common change management mistakes and disappointments. This guide will walk you through change management best practices for supply chain, including an in-depth overview of how Starbucks effectively wielded change management best practices at a critical juncture in its company’s history. Why Does Supply Chain Need a Change Management Strategy? It’s no secret among supply chain professionals that the need for change has arrived. A survey of supply chains found that 73% of companies are experiencing pressure to improve and expand their delivery capabilities. Meanwhile, 42% of companies2 answered a resounding “yes” when asked if their experience with the coronavirus pandemic had caused them to change their supply chain strategy, while 28.9% answered “maybe.”3 Those supply chain leaders firmly on board with enacting change are likely inundated with the plethora of options available to them—supply chain is a unique industry, change management is hard, and while many strategies exist for the best way to approach it, there are few tailored specifically towards the needs of supply chain. Those leaders that are on the fence could be so for the simple fact that change management, although ultimately valuable, has a reputation as being both very challenging and often unsuccessful. That oft-quoted statistic of 70% of change programs failing to achieve their goals is well known for a reason. While many things can go wrong within a change managementstrategy, the main reason for failure is usually chalked up to employee resistance: a problem that 72% of leaders4 say they don’t know how to fix, either because they are too disconnected from the work, or out of sync with the cadence for effectively implementing change. That being said, it is possible to align leaders and their employees by implementing a clear-cut change management strategy (which this guide will go on to explain). The next hurdle after aligning an organization is actually implementing the change: a notoriously tedious process that can cause even the most stalwart leaders to balk. 51% of leaders report navigating change fatigue as a main frustration in business transformation, with the ability to generate and sustain momentum being a concern for another 35% of leaders.5 Navigating the challenges associated with change management is well worth it, however: research shows that among projects that effectively apply change management: • 94% meet or exceed project objectives • 81% were at or under budget • 71% were on or ahead of schedule6 These results clearly underscore the efficacy of change management when properly implemented. The question supply chain professionals should be asking themselves isn’t if they should implement change—it’s how to pull it off. 1 “Cracking the Code of Change.” Harvard Business Review, July 15 2021. https://hbr.org/2000/05/cracking-the-code-of-change 2 “Impact of Covid-19 on Shipping and Supply Chain Strategies”Statista, July 15 2021. https://www.statista.com/statis- tics/1129213/covid-19-impact-shipping-supply-chain-strategies/ 3 “Aligning the Supply Chain in the Age of Delivery Economy.” Project 44, July 15 2021, https://www.project44.com/resources/aligning-the-supply-chain-in-the-age-of-the-delivery-economy 4 “3 Change Management Statistics You Need to Know.” Capacity for Health, July 16 2021. https://capacity4health.org/change-management-statistics/ 5 “Nine Business Transformations You Can’t Afford to Ignore in 2019.’ Institute for Public Relations, July 2 16 2021. https://instituteforpr.org/nine-business-transformation-stats-you-cant-afford-to-ignore-in-2019/ 6 “Changing Change Management: an Open-Source Approach.” Gartner, July 16 2021. https://emtemp.gcom.cloud/ngw/globalassets/en/human-re- sources/documents/trends/changing-change-management.pdf Change Management Best Practices for Supply Chain The most fundamental cornerstone in successfully implementing change management is to have a clear-cut strategy that organizations can systematically follow through on. Research shows that companies following a structured change management strategy are 33% more likely to achieve success.7 That being said, here is a two- part change management strategy built out specifically for supply chain and answering its unique challenges. The first step for implementinga supply chain change management strategy involves building out a roadmap that determines the most important processes to update, with clear steps to follow through. The second component of a change management strategy addresses how to implement those changes on a managerial level. First, supply chain leaders will want to: • Pick a high-priority supply chain issue and focus on it: A supply chain manager should start by determining the supply chain’s most pressing pain points, and then selecting a single use case to focus on. That use case can be either a process in supply chain that needs improvement (such as the amount of time it takes for employees to resolve an incident), or an operation that requires correction (such as chronic part shortages). Leaders should be clear on the value of making that improvement by naming the benefits it will bring to their supply chain. Once that understanding has been reached, they can move forward by making contact with the business unit and team responsible for that process or operation. If a supply chain manager is unsure where to start, know that any team that has been asking for help or is known to be receptive to new technologies will make great candidates. After making contact, supply chain managers will want to document a to-from of the new process with new standard operating procedures (SOPs). This will be the team’s change-management bible. (Note: while most supply chain processes cut across multiple teams and functions, it’s usually still possible to determine an owner of a process. For our purposes here, we’re assuming the process owner is within the selected business unit.) • Choose a technology partner: The next step for supply chain managers is to choose a technology that supports the implementation of their change management strategy. Keep in mind that the best solutions will be able to remedy not just the initial challenge that the team is working to address, but various other pain points to work on over time. In many situations, supply chain operators will likely partner with IT to support the technology roll-out. It’s essential that IT is aligned with the chosen roadmap from step one. While IT can be a great partner that will most likely be called upon if the chosen initiative involves data, keep in mind that IT supports many “important” projects. Supply chain leaders will need to make sure that their operation’s needs are being fully fulfilled. In the most successful projects, Business takes the role of decision maker and owner while IT takes the role of enabler and coach. • Configure the chosen solution to meet your supply chain needs: Take time to learn the technology and align it to answer to the selected process. For example, a platform designed to improve incident resolution rates will need to be customized to include incident types, resolution codes, users, and so on to meet a business’ specific needs. A few extra hours upfront to properly map out the new process and personalize the technology, will go a long way to ensuring effective training and successful adoption. • Train the users: Training includes a general overview of the chosen technology and how to use it, as well as a detailed walk-through of the new SOPs. Every user should be clear on how to use the technology to run the chosen process, as well as receive instruction to personalize the system to see the things they care about. This step is a common pain point, but specificity helps: research shows that change programs clearly identifying roles and responsibilities are 6.4 times more likely to succeed.8 • Cutover: Select a date that the new process goes live. It is critical that the team fully cuts over to the new process in order to avoid errors, delays, and team push-back (no one enjoys redundant work, and having to repeat steps can build up resistance to the entire approach). The first week is a crucial one for reinforcement: management should do daily check-ins to answer questions and encourage adoption. 7 “Best Practices in Change Management.” Prosci, July 16 2021. https://www.prosci.com/resources/articles/change-management-best-practices 8 “How Do We Manage the Change Management Journey?” McKinsey & Company, July 16 2021.
Recommended publications
  • Corporate Culture and Organizational Change- a Study on a Large Pharmaceutical Company in Bangladesh
    Asian Business Review, Volume 4, Number 2/2014 (Issue 8) ISSN 2304-2613 (Print); ISSN 2305-8730 (Online) 0 Corporate Culture and Organizational Change- a Study on a Large Pharmaceutical Company in Bangladesh S.M. Rezaul Ahsan Senior Manager, Organization Development, The ACME Laboratories Ltd, Dhaka, BANGLADESH ABSTRACT This paper investigates the relationship between corporate culture and attitudes toward organizational change from the perspectives of a large pharmaceutical company in Bangladesh. A structured questionnaire was developed on the basis of the competing values framework of culture typology of Cameron and Quinn (2006) and a study of Justina Simon (June 2012), which was distributed to the 55 staff members of the company. The result shows that there is a significant relationship between corporate culture and organizational change. The study reveals that the organization has adopted all four types of organizational culture and the dominant existing organizational culture is the hierarchy culture. The study also shows that the resistance to change is a function of organizational culture. The implications of the study are also discussed. Key Words: Organizational Culture, Organizational Change, Resistance to change, Change Management JEL Classification Code: G39 INTRODUCTION Corporate culture is a popular and versatile concept in investigate the impact of organizational culture on C the field of organizational behavior and has been organizational change. identified as an influential factor affecting the success There has been significant research in the literature to and failure of organizational change efforts. Culture can explore the impact of organizational culture on both help and hinder the change process; be both a blessing organizational change.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Between Innovation and Change Management
    International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 6, June 2013 1 ISSN 2250-3153 An Exploratory Study of the Relationship between Innovation and Change Management Kenneth Chukwujioke Agbim, Godday Orziemgbe Oriarewo & Abu Emmanuel Omattah Business Administration Department, College of Management Sciences, University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria Abstract- An organization that innovates its products, services change or adapt in response to changing environment unless they and/or processes has introduced change in the organization and have effective control over their activities. This implies that this change needs to be managed right from the beginning of the there is a need for organizations and their managers to develop innovation process. To be effective and efficient in managing effective and efficient change management strategy for the this change, organizations and their managers need to develop extreme ends stages in the innovation process (idea generation effective and efficient change management strategy for the and implementation). extreme ends stages in the innovation process – idea generation Change management with respect to innovation appears a and implementation. Thus, the study was designed to explore the simple enough term. However, in reality, this is rarely so owing relationship among the various images of managing, the to the varying nature of “managing” (coaching, interpreting, innovation process and change outcomes. The study adopted a nurturing, directing, navigating and caretaking) (Palmer and survey research method, while simple random sampling Dunford, 2002; Palmer et al., 2006) and “change” (Palmer and technique was employed to select the employees that completed Dunford, 2008) and the stages in the innovation process. The the questionnaire.
    [Show full text]
  • ICH Q10 and Change Management: Enabling Quality Improvement
    P10: Change Management By Bernadette Doyle, PhD ICH Q10 and Change Management: Enabling Quality Improvement Bernadette Doyle PhD Vice President and Head of Global Technical Group Global Manufacturing and Supply GlaxoSmithKline Overview . Drivers for Change . ICH Q10 and Change Management . Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9 and Q10 . Case Studies . Management Responsibility . Considerations and Opportunities . Summary P10: Change Management By Bernadette Doyle, PhD WHY CHANGE ? WHY CHANGE ? It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change. ~Author unknown, commonly misattributed to Charles Darwin P10: Change Management By Bernadette Doyle, PhD …. “Double S” curve of Improvement” Improvement Transformational (disruptive intervention) Incremental (continuous improvement) Time P10: Change Management By Bernadette Doyle, PhD ICH Q10 and Change Management .Change Management A systematic approach to proposing, evaluating, approving, implementing and reviewing changes (ICH Q10) . The scope of change management is much broader than change control, which was typically applied to one change at a time .Change management includes the oversight and management of the entire portfolio of changes and the change process, including all the components of change control .In a Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS) developed according to Q10, change management applies across the entire product lifecycle Change Management System . A company should have an effective change management system in order
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on the Effect of Change Management on Organizational Innovation: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Members’ Innovative Behavior
    sustainability Article A Study on the Effect of Change Management on Organizational Innovation: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Members’ Innovative Behavior Wookjoon Sung and Changil Kim * Graduate School of Public Policy and Information Technology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul 139743, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This study is an empirical study on the impact of change management on organizational innovation through innovative behavior in the public sector. The independent variables are the four elements of change management (organizational goal, transformational leadership, participation and communication, education and training), the dependent variable is organizational innovation, and the mediating variable is the innovative behavior of members. The data used for the analysis is the Public Service Recognition Survey 2018 by KIPA (the Korea Institute of Public Administration). Hayes’ Process Macro analysis (Model 4) was performed to verify the mediating variable. As a result of the analysis, it was found that change management factors have a positive effect on innovative behavior and organizational innovation. In addition, public officials’ innovative behavior played a mediating role between change management and organizational innovation. It was confirmed that the innovative behavior of organizational members is essential to achieve organizational innova- tion. Among the factors of change management, participation and communication had the highest influence on innovative behavior and organizational innovation. Citation: Sung, W.; Kim, C. A Study Keywords: on the Effect of Change Management change management; transformational leadership; organizational goal; participation and on Organizational Innovation: communicate; innovative behavior; organizational innovation; hayes process macro Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Members’ Innovative Behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Change Management in the Federal Workforce
    Guidance for Change Management in the Federal Workforce Accelerating the Gears of Transformation TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 Creating Change .............................................................................................................................. 4 1. Develop Strategic Objectives and Specific Future Human Capital Requirements .................. 6 2. Conduct Workforce Analysis ................................................................................................... 8 3. Consider Scenarios and Decide on a Path ............................................................................... 9 4. Plan for Structural and Cultural Change ................................................................................ 12 5. Manage Transformation through Ongoing Human Capital Strategies and Evaluation Processes ................................................................................................................................... 15 Guidance for Change Management in the Federal Workforce 2 INTRODUCTION Under the guidance of M‐17‐22 “Comprehensive Plan for Reforming the Federal Government and Reducing the Federal Civilian Workforce,” Federal agencies are reevaluating how to conduct operations, leveraging technology and automation, reshaping themselves to achieve those goals, and transforming their approach to human capital resources in order to most effectively and efficiently
    [Show full text]
  • Yale University Change Management Process Guide
    Yale University Change Management Process Guide Yale University Change Management Process 1 of 29 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Change Management Overview ................................................................................................................... 3 Change Management Key Concepts ......................................................................................................... 4 Change Management Policies ................................................................................................................... 5 Change Management Process Flow .............................................................................................................. 6 Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................................................................. 6 Process Procedures ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 Request Change .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Change in OECD Governments: an Introductory Framework", OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No
    Please cite this paper as: Huerta Melchor, O. (2008), "Managing Change in OECD Governments: An Introductory Framework", OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 12, OECD publishing, © OECD. doi:10.1787/227141782188 OECD Working Papers on Public Governance No. 12 Managing Change in OECD Governments AN INTRODUCTORY FRAMEWORK Oscar Huerta Melchor* *OECD, France OECD Working Papers on Public Governance No.12 Managing Change in OECD Governments An Introductory Framework Oscar Huerta Melchor June 2008 FOREWORD In its programme of work and budget for 2007-2008 the Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development of the OECD (GOV) includes the realisation of a study on managing change in government. The objective is to explore the different ways in which OECD countries are managing the change produced by the introduction of major reform initiatives intended to transform the administrative culture of the public service to make it more efficient and effective. In order to prepare the ground for study, GOV undertook a literature review and formulated a preliminary document submitted for discussion at the meeting of the Public Employment and Management (PEM) Working Party of the OECD in November 2007. Six OECD countries presented their experience on managing change: Finland, France, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Switzerland. This paper draws preliminary conclusions that will require further exploration and discussion which may be part of a future work programme. This project was led by Oscar Huerta Melchor (OECD, Secretariat) and reviewed by Elsa Pilichowski (OECD, Secretariat) under the supervision of Barry Anderson (OECD, Secretariat).The six case studies are revised versions of the reports presented at the PEM working party meeting in 2007 by the following government officials from OECD member countries: Finland: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Steps for Successful Change Management Strategy
    Seven Steps for Successful Change Management Strategy A Workable Process for Change Executive Summary The Association of Change Management Professionals® (ACMP®)1 Standard for Change Management©2 provides a thorough guide to developing a change management strategy. The Standard was built from the ground up by a working group of over 1,100 change management thought leaders and volunteers from 57 countries, each averaging more than 10 years experience. In this document, jTask Inc. unpacks the ACMP Standard elements of change management strategy, and adds our own advice as experts in Change Management, just as we do when working with our clients. The ACMP Standard for Change Management separates the change effort into five major areas that are: 1. Evaluate the Change Impact and Organizational Readiness 2. Formulate the Change Management Strategy 3. Develop the Change Management Plan 4. Execute the Change Management Plan 5. Complete the Change Management Effort At jTask we think Formulate the Change Management Strategy is the most important part of the Change Management process. The strategy needs to be correct for any change implementation. We have explored the issues to help you select the right approach in each key step to build your change management strategy. A New Approach to Change As a leader of your organization, you already know that change is inevitable. Whether it's changing one step of a process, overhauling a department, or making a complete business transformation, change is an important part of growth, development, and success. Of course, change is a complicated process, with the potential for great success or failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Change Management- a Challenge in Supply Chain Management
    Global Journal of Management and Business Studies. ISSN 2248-9878 Volume 3, Number 5 (2013), pp. 549-554 © Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/gjmbs.htm Change Management- A Challenge in Supply Chain Management Jyoti Jindal Former Lecturer, GGS College for Women, Chandigarh. Abstract Ever changing business environment is resulting in an ever increasing need for making corresponding changes in your business system. Entrepreneurs who are slow or who fail in their endeavor to implement change get left behind with fair chances of getting doomed. The biggest challenge is to the supply change management because of ever changing technologies, fast product improvements, and inclination to adopt global perspective for future growth. Consumer has a wide choice today because of high degree of visibility of world markets. There is frequent introduction of innovative products in the market by global competitors forcing various entrepreneurs to find alternative ways to maintain their market share. Increased international trades have changed various systems for material handling and transport etc. As such, there are many such factors which call for changes in supply chain management every now and then. There are various challenges in managing changes, particularly changes in supply chains, which are life line of any organization. Any disruption to it can result in a devastating impact on the health of an organization. No matter how effective a change is designed, it can be undermined by a few disgruntled individuals at some point of supply chain. There is no clear cut methodology that can effectively tackle all changes in supply chains of all organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Successful Implementation of Supply Chain Management Technology Initiatives: Technological Readiness As a Key Indicator
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Fall 2015 The Successful Implementation of Supply Chain Management Technology Initiatives: Technological Readiness as a Key Indicator Scott R. Cox Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Part of the Operations and Supply Chain Management Commons Recommended Citation Cox, Scott R., "The Successful Implementation of Supply Chain Management Technology Initiatives: Technological Readiness as a Key Indicator" (2015). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1351. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/1351 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVES: TECHNOLOGICAL READINESS AS A KEY INDICATOR by SCOTT R. COX (Under the Direction of Stephen M. Rutner) ABSTRACT The emergence of what is modern supply chain management (SCM) can be attributed to the revolutionary advances in information technology over the past three decades. Despite significant investment in supply chain management technology (SCMT) and the implementation process, many companies still experience considerable complications during SCMT implementation. There is a dearth of research concerning the implementation of SCMT. A proven path to supply chain technology implementation has yet to be established. In an effort to address this gap, this dissertation considers the role of technological readiness as a part of a comprehensive model for SCMT implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Organizational Change Management in Higher Education Through the Lens of Executive Coaches
    education sciences Article Organizational Change Management in Higher Education through the Lens of Executive Coaches Dimitrios Vlachopoulos Faculty of Digital Media & Creative Industries, Digital Society School, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, 1091 GM Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] Abstract: This study investigated perceptions of organizational change management among executive coaches working with British higher-education leaders and factors that make leaders effective when managing change. This basic qualitative research used semi-structured interviews with eight executive coaches selected through purposeful sampling. As main challenges to efficient, inclusive change management, participants mentioned leaders’ lack of a strategic vision or plan, lack of leadership and future leader development programs, and lack of clarity in decision-making. They recognized that leaders’ academic and professional profiles are positively viewed and said that, with coaching and support in leadership and strategic planning, these people can inspire the academic community and promote positive change. Additional emphasis was given to the role of coaching in the development of key soft skills (honesty, responsibility, resiliency, creativity, proactivity, and empathy, among others), which are necessary for effective change management and leadership in higher education. The paper’s implications have two aspects. First, the lessons of the actual explicit content of the coaches’ observations (challenges to efficient change management and views of leaders); second, the implications of these observations (how coaching can help and what leaders need). Keywords: higher education; qualitative research; organizational change management; academic Citation: Vlachopoulos, D. leadership development; academic leadership Organizational Change Management in Higher Education through the Lens of Executive Coaches. Educ. Sci.
    [Show full text]
  • Create Real Change by Pulling the Eight Levers
    NANO TOOLS FOR LEADERS® CREATE REAL CHANGE BY PULLING THE EIGHT LEVERS Nano Tools for Leaders® are fast, effective leadership tools that you can learn and start using in less than 15 minutes — with the potential to signifi- cantly impact your success as a leader and the engagement and productivity of the people you lead. Contributor: Greg Shea, Adjunct Professor of Management, Faculty Associate, Center for Leadership and Change Management, The Wharton School; and Cassie Solomon, president and founder of The New Group Consulting, Inc. THE GOAL: Ensure your next change initiative is a success by adapting your work envi- ronment to support it. NANO TOOL: Real change is hard to come by. Studies consistently show that more than half of all change initiatives end in failure. Many of those initiatives rely heavily, even overwhelmingly on leadership skills such as walking the talk and careful communica- tion plans. Yet such an approach by itself often falls short. Success is more likely if leaders take the time to lead change by carefully identifying the new behaviors that change will require from people and then designing the work environment to encourage and reinforce exactly those behaviors. The Visionary Leadership Nano Tool showed you how to identify the end-point behaviors that are the mark a successful transformation. Now, we turn to the work environment — how can you redesign it to make those ideal behaviors and actions more likely to occur? The work system as a whole is composed of eight environmental aspects, each of which can become a powerful lever for change.
    [Show full text]