DOCSLIB.ORG

The Development of the Landlord's Hypothec 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Development of the Landlord's Hypothec 1 _______________________________________________________________ THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LANDLORD’S HYPOTHEC Rena van den Bergh* 1 Introduction In ancient Rome personal security was the most common form of security. This may be attributed to the large number of relationships based on fidelity.1 Most substantial transactions on credit were accompanied by such security. Fideiussio (suretyship or a fidelity bond) was concluded by means of stipulatio. In terms of this verbal contract the surety or guarantor pledged himself to fulfil the debtor’s agreement towards the creditor if the debtor could not honour it. The Romans also knew real security. According to Lee “[b]y a real security is meant a real right created to secure the performance of an obligation”.2 Buckland states that the essence of transactions creating real security is to give the creditor some right, essentially a right in rem, over property by way of security for the debt.3 Schulz defines a real security as a right over a thing (movable or immovable) granted to a creditor in order to secure his claim against a debtor.4 Real credit developed slowly and imperfectly in Roman economic life.5 In this article the development of this real right will be explored. Attention will also be given to the development of tacit hypothecs and the differences between rural and urban premises as far as the landlord’s hypothec is concerned. * Professor, Department of Jurisprudence, School of Law, University of South Africa (BA (Hons), MA, LLB, LLD (Unisa)). 1 Schulz Principles of Roman Law (1936) 237. See, further, Schulz Classical Roman Law (1961) 402 who emphasises that in the law of the Republic as well as the classical period, the principal form of credit was personal and not real security: “Roman fides, Roman pedantic accuracy, honesty, and reliability in business matters were the strong pillars of that credit.” Furthermore, execution on the person of the debtor was still in force, and personal credit consequently implied much greater security for the creditor than it provides in modern times. The giving of sureties and pledges, which was obligatory for contracts with the censors, also presupposed friends and patrons ready to step in and undertake the charge. Cf Hallebeek Fons et Origo. Een Historische Inleiding tot het Vermogensrecht (2006) 84; Honsell, Mayer-Maly & Selb Römisches Recht (1987) 195; Thomas Textbook of Roman Law (1981) 328; Nicholas An Introduction to Roman Law (1962) 150-151; Schulz Classical Roman Law 407-408. According to Kaser Das Römische Privatrecht Vol 1 (1971) 457 the fact that it was seen as more important than real security may also be proven by the fact that all the legalities of real securities – even during the classical period – had not yet been finalised and crystallised. 2 The Elements of Roman Law with a Translation of the Institutes of Justinian (1952) 170. 3 A Textbook of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian (1975) 473. 4 Classical Roman Law (n 1) 400. 5 Idem 403. 156 The development of the landlord’s hypothec _______________________________________________________________ 2 Real security In this discussion it is important to keep in mind that real security was always dependent upon an obligation. The relationship between creditor and debtor was essential, and without it there could be no security. When such security was given and the secured obligation ceased to exist, the real right of the secured creditor in principle came to an end.6 In the course of Roman legal development there were three forms of real security namely fiducia, pignus and hypotheca. Fiducia was a form of real security where ownership of the object was transferred to the creditor.7 The next form of security to be introduced was pignus, in which case possession passed to the creditor but ownership remained with the debtor.8 The last form of real security was that of hypotheca where the creditor had the right to take possession, but the thing was not actually handed over.9 In Roman law there was not much difference between pignus and hypotheca: the first term was usually used in those cases where possession of the pledge was transferred to the creditor and the second when the debtor retained possession of the 6 D 20 1 5pr; D 20 4 1; D 20 4 9pr; D 20 6 6pr. See also Buckland (n 3) 317-318; Thomas (n 1) 329; Van Warmelo An Introduction to the Principles of Roman Civil Law (1976) 113. 7 See Joubert Romeinse Reg vir Regspraktisyns en Akademici (2004) 210-211; Spruit Cunabula Iuris. Elementen van het Romeinse Privaatrecht (2003) 235 237-239; Van Zyl Geskiedenis en Beginsels van die Romeinse Privaatreg (1977) 191-192; Watson The Law of Obligations in the Later Roman Republic (1965) 172; Jolowicz Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law (1954) 318; Van Oven Leerboek van Romeinsch Privaatrecht (1948) 169-173; Sohm The Institutes. A Textbook of the History and System of Roman Private Law (tr by Ledlie) (1935) 352-353; Buckland (n 3) 473-474; Lee (n 2) 171; Thomas (n 1) 329-330; Van Warmelo (n 6) 113-114; Hallebeek (n 1) 85; Honsell, Mayer-Maly & Selb (n 1) 200-201; Kaser Vol 1 (n 1) 460- 463; Schulz Classical Roman Law (n 1) 406-407; Nicholas (n 1) 150-151. Fiducia was the oldest type of real security. It was used to constitute real security for the creditor and consisted in the transfer of ownership of the object which was to serve as security to the creditor. This was done by means of mancipatio or in iure cessio, subject to an agreement of trust (fiducia) that it would be reconveyed once the debt was paid. The transfer was subject to an agreement of trust to the effect that ownership was transferred only for a specific purpose. The inherent dangers of this kind of security, from the debtor’s point of view, were (1) that the debtor would only have a personal action against the creditor if he were to be untrustworthy; (2) that the debtor took all the risk; and (3) that successive mortgages were not possible. It was probably for these reasons that other types of real security evolved. However, in spite of these disadvantages fiducia remained in use throughout the classical period. 8 A term usually used for a pledge delivered to the creditor and which was made possible by the praetor granting protection of possession: see Buckland (n 3) 474-475; Watson (n 7) 179-184; Jolowicz (n 7) 317; Lee (n 2) 171-172; Schulz Classical Roman Law (n 1) 407; Spruit (n 7) 235, 239-240; Hallebeek (n 1) 85; Honsell, Mayer-Maly & Selb (n 1) 201-203; Kaser Vol 1 (n 1) 463- 469; Van Zyl (n 7) 192-193; Thomas (n 1) 330-332; Van Warmelo (n 6) 115-116; Sohm (n 7) 353-354; Van Oven (n 7) 166-181. At 168 Van Oven points out that pledge was a late Roman development. It was a creation of praetorian law and only regarded as a real right because it could eventually be enforced with an actio in rem. Under the word pignus the Romans understood the right as well as the thing itself. The pledgee’s real right was established by (1) the transfer of possession; (2) an agreement by the parties (conventio pignoris) and (3) a debt which was secured by the parties. 9 A term used for a pledge which was not delivered: Kaser Vol 1 (n 1) 463; Buckland (n 3) 475- 476; Jolowicz (n 7) 319; Lee (n 2) 172; Schulz Classical Roman Law (n 1) 407-408; Watson (n 7) 179-180; Spruit (n 7) 235 239-240; Honsell, Mayer-Maly & Selb (n 1) 203-206; Van Zyl (n 7) 193-196; Thomas (n 1) 332-334; Van Warmelo (n 6) 116-119; Sohm (n 7) 354-357. 2009 (15-1) Fundamina 157 _______________________________________________________________ pledge.10 The final development came with an agreement, sometimes tacit, which eventually culminated in a real right for the creditor. The development of this form of security will now be discussed. 3 Development of the (tacit) hypothec 3 1 First appearance The need for a significant change in the field of security, namely a right in rem against the mortgaged property without either possession or ownership passing, must have been felt fairly early.11 Under the Republic the history of the protection of the creditor without possession started with cases in which a landlord was willing to lease his land to a tenant (colonus).12 The landlord obviously wished to collect the rent, but in most cases it could not be paid before the harvest and there was thus a need for credit until such time as the crop was gathered.13 He therefore required some form of security. Usually the only property an agricultural tenant could pledge would be his cattle, slaves and farming equipment, that is, everything he would require to farm. In the case of both fiducia and pignus this would mean that the tenant would lose control of the property pledged and would consequently not be able to farm.14 This impossible situation led to the development of a new form of security.15 The rural hypothec originally arose by special agreement between the parties that the landlord would be entitled to take the pledged property as well as the harvest if the tenant failed to pay the rent when it became due: “A debtor agreed that whatever was brought on the mortgaged land or there arose or was 10 D 13 7 9 2: “Strictly speaking, we use pignus for the pledge which is handed over to the creditor and hypotheca for the case in which he does not even get possession”; D 20 1 5 1: “The difference between pignus and hypotheca is purely verbal”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Formal Requirements of Pledge Under Louisiana Civil Code Article 3158 and Related Articles Valerie Seal Meiners
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 48 | Number 1 September 1987 Formal Requirements of Pledge Under Louisiana Civil Code Article 3158 and Related Articles Valerie Seal Meiners Repository Citation Valerie Seal Meiners, Formal Requirements of Pledge Under Louisiana Civil Code Article 3158 and Related Articles, 48 La. L. Rev. (1987) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol48/iss1/8 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENTS FORMAL REQUIREMENTS OF PLEDGE UNDER LOUISIANA CIVIL CODE ARTICLE 3158 AND RELATED ARTICLES' According to the scholar Denis, "[t]he pledge springs from natural law and is of the farthest antiquity;" it secured debts "in the primitive relations of men." ' 2 Although the specific beginnings are unknown, fre- quent mention of the pledge in ancient texts evidences its early application3 and points to at least one conclusion: that in its earliest stages of development, formalities of pledge were much simpler, albeit more dra- matic, than those of today. Herodotus, in his Histories, explains that a debtor in ancient Egypt would deliver the mummy of his father to his creditor, who was quite willing to make a loan on this basis. 4 Since the mummy was of great religious value to the debtor, he would certainly pay the debt in order to redeem the pledge. In ancient Athens and Rome, the mechanics of pledge were similarly simple: the debtor and creditor contracted that, upon default of the loan, the debtor would become the slave of the creditor until the debt was repaid.
    [Show full text]
  • Law of Property and Security B
    "" LAW OF PROPERTY AND SECURITY B 2010 PROFESSOR R. MQEKE LAW OF PROPERTY AND SECURITY B COURSE OUTLINE 2010 1 Introduction Overview Law of Property and Security B is a semester course which aims to build upon on the content of the Law of Property and Security A course and to introduce students to other aspects of property law, especially the law relating to security and some of the most important South African property law statutes. Credit value 10 credits which translate to 10 hours to be spent on this course per week. There are two 45 minute lectures per week in this course. Students are thus required to do 8 hours and 30 minutes of independent work in this course per week. 1.3 Assumptions of prior learning It is assumed that: . students have the ability to communicate in written and spoken English at least at the levelof NQFlevel4; . students are capable of independent work. students have passed at least one year of law studies. 2 Outcomes 2.1 Critical outcomes This course will contribute to students attaining the following critical outcomes: 2.1.1 organise and manage themselves; 2.1.2 collect, analyse and evaluate information; 2.1.3 recognise problem solving contexts; 2.1.4 identify and solve problems; 2.1.5 communicate effectively; 2.1.6 participate as responsible citizens and 2.1.7 be culturally sensitive. 2.2 Intended specific outcomes A) Knowledge outcomes: It is intended that students know and understand: 1 the purpose and function of real and personal security and the property statutes dealt with in the syllabus.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Interests Under Pledge Agreements
    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL EDITORIAL BOARD ALLEN H. MfERRILL Editor-in-Chief Romwr H. HARRY JAciz M. Giusn4,- RUSSELL G. OLSEN MARSHALL HoatrLoWEfl Comment Editors Note Editors FRANRLN M. SCHULTZ RicrrarD A. SOLO.I0No Article and Book Review Editor Case Editor LEwIs C. BOSE TYLER HULL Txxomis C. MAsoz. ERIc H. HAGER EDWIN P. KAUF73A Do:NALD L SmwmLns HENRY KoHN, JR. Editors in Military Service: Louis F. OBERuoR0ER. Editor-in-Chlef DONALD F. KEEFE. Comwent Editor Subscription price $4.50 per year 80 cents pcr ntzmbcr Canadian subscription price $5.00 per ycar: Foreign. $5.25 per year Yale Law JournalCompany, Inc., Box 401A, Yahk Station, Ncw, Itavcn, Con12. SECURITY INTERESTS UNDER PLEDGE AGREEMENTS THE extent to which security law in responding to the ned of business practice nmust reconcile conflicting commercial foirces is illustrated Iby the doctrinal history of the pledge. Both parties to a credit transaction frequently desire, for reasons of expense or business expediency, that the security reb be retained by the borrower. On the other hand, third persons may demand notice of the lender's security interest in order to guide their course uf dealing with the debtor.' The search for a mean proves particularly difficult when the parties avail themselves of the pledge device. Once borrower and lender select its simple formula in order to avoid the requirements sur- rounding such alternative devices as the chattel mortgage and conditional sale, the courts respond to the demand of third persons for notice by com- pelling the lender to take possession of the property as a condition precedent 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate 2018
    ICLG The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Real Estate 2018 13th Edition A practical cross-border insight into real estate law Published by Global Legal Group with contributions from: Attorneys-at-Law Project Law Ltd Machado, Meyer, Sendacz e Opice Advogados BKA Attorneys at Law Maples and Calder Brulc Gaberščik & Partners, Law Firm, Ltd. Meyerlustenberger Lachenal AG BSA Ahmad Bin Hezeem & Associates LLP Nishimura & Asahi Cordero & Cordero Abogados Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc. Cushman & Wakefield Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP Gianni, Origoni, Grippo, Cappelli & Partners PAV Law Offices Greenberg Traurig Grzesiak sp.k Prieto Cabrera & Asociados SRL Greenberg Traurig, LLP Ropes & Gray LLP GSK Stockmann Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP Gürlich & Co. Simon Reid-Kay & Associates Hogan Lovells Tirard, Naudin Howard Kennedy Toronto CREW Konečná & Zacha Tughans Kubes Passeyrer Attorneys at Law Ziv Lev & Co. Law Office The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Real Estate 2018 General Chapters: 1 Real Estate Joint Ventures: New Paradigm or Passing Fashion? – Iain Morpeth, Ropes & Gray LLP 1 2 Serviced Offices: The Changing Face of the Real Estate Market – Rebecca Davison & Nicky Stewart, Howard Kennedy 5 Contributing Editor 3 Toronto CREW and an Outlook on the Canadian Market for 2018 – Rosalyn Wallace, Toronto CREW Iain Morpeth, & Stuart Barron, Cushman & Wakefield 9 Ropes & Gray LLP Sales Director Country Question and Answer Chapters: Florjan Osmani 4 Austria Kubes Passeyrer Attorneys at Law: Dr. David Kubes & Mag. Marko Marjanovic 12 Account Director 5 Brazil Machado, Meyer, Sendacz e Opice Advogados: Maria Flavia Candido Seabra Oliver Smith & Fatima Tadea Rombola Fonseca 20 Sales Support Manager Toni Hayward 6 Canada Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP: Heather McKean & Stella Di Cresce 30 Senior Editors 7 Costa Rica Cordero & Cordero Abogados: Hernán Cordero B.
    [Show full text]
  • Contract of Bailment and Pledge By- Dr Sunita Srivastava, Department of Commerce, University of Lucknow Contract of Bailment and Pledge
    Business law- B.Com II semester Topic- Contract of bailment and pledge By- Dr Sunita Srivastava, Department of commerce, University of Lucknow Contract of Bailment And Pledge Meaning of bailment- The word ‘Bailment’ is derived from French word ‘baillier’ which means to deliver. According to sec 14, a “Bailment’ is the delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, with a condition to return the goods when the purpose is over or otherwise disposed off according to the direction of the person delivering them. Parties in bailment contract Bailor- The person delivering the goods is called the bailor. Bailee- The person to whom the goods are delivered is called the bailee. Example: - 1. Mr. X who is going out of station delivers a dog to Mr. Y for proper care. 2. Mr. A hires a horse for riding. 3. Mr. A deliver watch for repair. 4. Mr. A gives a cloth to his tailor for stitching. Essential Elements of a valid bailment Agreement between bailor and bailee Delivery of goods Ownership not change Only movable goods Delivery for some purpose Change in forms Return of goods There must be an agreement between the bailor and bailee. This agreement may be express or implied. However, a bailment may be implied by law as it happens in the case of finder of lost goods. In bailment, it is necessary that the goods should be delivered to the bailee. It is the essence of the contract of bailment. It is further necessary that the possession of the goods should be voluntarily transferred and is in the accordance with the contract.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rights of a Pledgor on Transfers of a Pledge James Lewis Parks
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 1922 The Rights of a Pledgor on Transfers of a Pledge James Lewis Parks Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Parks, James Lewis, "The Rights of a Pledgor on Transfers of a Pledge" (1922). Minnesota Law Review. 1549. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/1549 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 FEBRUARY, 1922 No. 3 THE RIGHTS OF A PLEDGOR ON TRANSFERS OF A PLEDGE By JAMES LE:wIS PARKS* N certain communities, personal property of one kind or another is frequently deposited by way of pledge or pawn to secure the performance of an obligation. The question as to the rights of the pledgor and pledgee in the property, both before and after the maturity' of the debt is of importance, and the results flowing from an improper and illegal transfer of the pledge by the pledgee are often complicated. It is, accordingly, proposed in the following pages to consider transactions involving transfers of the property by the pledgee, and to endeavor to formulate the rules which regulate the rights and obligations of the parties in this respect. According to Story's definition, which has been universally accepted, a pledge or pawn
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciling Maritime Liens and Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims: a Comparison of English Law and Chinese
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND LAW Southampton Law School Reconciling Maritime Liens and Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims: A Comparison of English Law and Chinese Law by Dingjing Huang Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2015 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND LAW Southampton Law School Doctor of Philosophy Reconciling Maritime Liens and Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims: A Comparison of English Law and Chinese Law by Dingjing Huang In maritime law, there are two special regimes for maritime claims, namely maritime liens and limitation of liability for maritime claims. Each of the regimes provides the maritime claimant or the liable person some special rights. It appears that the legal principles underlying maritime liens and limitation of liability are not related, however, they are interconnected in that both of them seek to strike a proper balance in the encouragement of shipping on the one hand and the effective prosecution of maritime claims on the other hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Law on Contractual Pledge
    F.Y.R. Macedonia Law on Contractual Pledge (adopted on 31 January 2003) Important Disclaimer This does not constitute an official translation and the translator cannot be held responsible for any inaccuracy or omission in the translation. The text should be used for information purposes only and appropriate legal advice should be sought as and when appropriate. Chapter I - General Provisions Article 1 This Law regulates the manner, conditions and procedure for creation, existence, realization and termination of the contractual pledge right over moveable property, securities, claims and other rights (pledge on movables) and immovables (mortgage) (in the further text: pledge, right on pledge). Article 2 The pledge serves as a security for monetary and other types of claims, whose value is measurable in monetary terms, that the creditor has with respect to his/hers debtor from certain obligatory relation. For the claims secured by pledge, in case they are not collected within their maturity, the pledgee, can obtain satisfaction from the value of the subject of the pledge, or under conditions and manner prescribed by this Law obtain right on ownership of the subject of the pledge (lex commissaria). The claims described in paragraph 1 are considered as sufficiently identified in case their carrier, debtor, legal basis and the amount, i.e., the type of the claims, are known. Article 3 The pledge on movables can be established by transfer of the subject into possession (possessory pledge) or without its transfer into possession (non-possessory pledge), while the mortgage can only be established as non-possessory. Article 4 Subject of pledge on movables can be any moveable property, security, certain ownership claim or other right, while subject of mortgage can only be certain immovable property or subject expressed as a immoveable property, with this or other law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Practical Lender
    VEDDERPRICE ® Finance and Transactions Group October 2008 The Practical Lender Cross-Border Lending Introduction IRC § 956-The “Deemed subsidiary’s current and accumulated earnings and Globalization of business has Dividend Rule” profi ts are less than the amount accelerated. In order to remain Under Internal Revenue Code of the U.S. obligation, then all competitive, lenders must be (“IRC”) § 956, the obligation of a of the foreign subsidiary’s prepared to structure U.S. corporate parent to a future earnings and profi ts will transactions with cross-border lender will trigger a “deemed be subject to the deemed lending features—loans to dividend” of the controlled distribution up to the amount of foreign borrowers or loans foreign subsidiary’s current and the U.S. loan obligation (after against the value of foreign accumulated earnings and subtracting prior deemed borrowers’ assets. Cross- profi ts up to the amount of the distributions). border lending requires lenders U.S. loan obligation if any one Borrowers and lenders often to address issues related to of the following three events assume that a U.S. parent taxes, security and available occurs: (a) 66⅔ percent or cannot pledge the stock of a remedies. This article briefl y more of the foreign subsidiary’s foreign subsidiary and that a discusses these issues and outstanding voting stock is foreign subsidiary cannot focuses on the laws of Canada pledged to the U.S. parent’s guarantee or pledge its assets and Mexico relative to security lender (accompanied by certain in support of the loan to the and insolvency. Practical tips restrictions on the disposition of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Devices - Pledge - Requirement of Dispossession Stanford O
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 26 | Number 1 December 1965 Security Devices - Pledge - Requirement of Dispossession Stanford O. Bardwell Jr. Repository Citation Stanford O. Bardwell Jr., Security Devices - Pledge - Requirement of Dispossession, 26 La. L. Rev. (1965) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol26/iss1/19 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol. XXVI cause of this, personal privileges and freedoms are receiving more protection from state abuse than they once did. The minority position, as expressed in separate concurring opinions by Justices Harlan and Stewart, was that the state conviction should be reversed because absence of an opportunity to confront and cross-examine the witness, through counsel, was a denial of due process of law guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment, but that the fourteenth amendment should be controlling in- dependently of the sixth. Justice Harlan argued that the Court had not incorporated the first eight amendments in toto was evidence that not all of the provisions of the Bill of Rights are fundamental, 3 2 yet the Court ignored the possibility that all parts of any one provision may not necessarily be fundamental. The traditional and indispensable diversity of the federal system, subject of course to due process of law, was also alluded to by Justice Harlan as a reason not to bind the states rigidly in the area of criminal law enforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Legal System and Procedures for Promoting Enabling Business Environment Final Report
    Study on Legal System and Procedures for Promoting Enabling Business Environment Final Report March 2014 Japan International Cooperation Agency Mitsubishi UFJ Research and Consulting Co. Ltd. KRI International Corp. Study on Legal System and Procedures for Promoting Enabling Business Environment Final Report Study on Legal System and Procedures for Promoting Enabling Business Environment Final Report Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 Outline of the Study ................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1. Background of the Study ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2. Purpose of the Study ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3. Implementation Structure of the Study ................................................................................... 1-2 1.4. Study Schedule ........................................................................................................................ 1-3 CHAPTER 2 Overview of the Current Economic Situations in Myanmar, Cambodia and Bangladesh 2-1 2.1. Overview of the Economy, Investment and Trade in Myanmar .............................................. 2-1 2.1.1. Economic Trends ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.2. Investment Trends ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Definition – Essentials – Kinds – Rights and Duties of Bailor and Bailee – Bailee’S Lien – Termination of Bailment
    UNIT II Bailment and pledge - bailment – definition – essentials – kinds – rights and duties of bailor and bailee – bailee’s lien – termination of bailment. Pledge – definition – rights and duties of Pawnor and Pawnee – Pledge by non – owners Bailment and pledge Secs 148 to 181 of the Contract Act of deal with contracts of bailment and pledge. Bailment the world ‘bailment’ is derived from the French world the French world ‘baillier’ which means “to deliver”, it means any kind of handling over’. In legal sense, it involves change of possession of goods from one person to another for some specific purpose. Definition of Bailment: Sec. 184 defines Bailment as the delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon a contract, that they shall, when the purpose is accomplished, be returned or otherwise disposed of according to the directions of the person delivering them. The person delivering the goods is called the ‘bailor’ and the person the person to whom they are delivered is called the ‘bailee’. Example: A delivers a piece of cloth to B, a bailor, to be stitched into a suit. There is a contract or bailment between A and B. Consideration in a contract of bailment: In a contract of bailment, the consideration is generally in the form money payment either by the bailor or the bailee, as for example, when A gives his bicycle to B for repair, or when A gives his car to B on hire. Such consideration in money form. Essential elements of bailment: To constitute a contract of bailment, the following conditions are to be satisfied.
    [Show full text]