Distribution of the Brown Recluse Spider (Araneae: Sicariidae) in Georgia with Comparison to Poison Center Reports of Envenomations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Distribution of the Brown Recluse Spider (Araneae: Sicariidae) in Georgia with Comparison to Poison Center Reports of Envenomations SAMPLING,DISTRIBUTION,DISPERSAL Distribution of the Brown Recluse Spider (Araneae: Sicariidae) in Georgia with Comparison to Poison Center Reports of Envenomations 1,2 3 4 RICHARD S. VETTER, NANCY C. HINKLE, AND LISA M. AMES J. Med. Entomol. 46(1): 15Ð20 (2009) ABSTRACT Georgia is on the southeastern margin of the native range of the brown recluse spider, Loxosceles reclusa Gertsch and Mulaik. The brown recluse is not a common Georgia spider and has limited distribution in the state. Using recent submissions, previously published records, and exam- ination of museum specimens, we document the spiderÕs presence in 31 (19.5%) of GeorgiaÕs 159 counties, with almost all being found in the northern portion. The spider was collected almost exclusively north of the Fall Line (a transition zone separating the Piedmont and the Coastal Plain geological provinces). Only two locations in the southern Coastal Plain province produced L. reclusa specimens; these southern Þnds are considered spiders that were transported outside their range. There were six Þnds of the non-native world tramp species, L. rufescens (Dufour), three south of the Fall Line. In conspicuous contrast, over a 5-yr period, a Georgia poison center database recorded 963 reports of brown recluse spider bites from 103 counties. These Þgures greatly outnumber the historic veriÞcations of brown recluses in the state for both specimen quantity and county occurrence, indicating improbable spider involvement and the overdiagnosis of bites. In the southern half of the state, medical diagnoses of brown recluse spider bites have virtually zero probability of being correct. Bite diagnoses should be made with caution in north Georgia given the spiderÕs spotty distribution with low frequency of occurrence. KEY WORDS Loxosceles reclusa, brown recluse spider, Arachnida, distribution, overdiagnosis The brown recluse spider, Loxosceles reclusa Gertsch Chamberlin and Ivie (1944) listed 350 spider species and Mulaik, is well known for causing dermonecrotic from the “Georgia area” (most of Georgia and South lesions in humans. Its native range is the south and Carolina) with the brown recluse not among them, central midwestern United States (Gertsch and Ennik supporting the notion that the spider is an uncommon 1983, Swanson and Vetter 2005, Vetter 2008), and it is entity in both states. Gorham (1968a) described col- rarely found outside of this distribution (Vetter and lections of L. reclusa from 4 of GeorgiaÕs 159 counties Bush 2002a, b, Vetter 2005, 2008). Despite the infamy (Fulton, Oglethorpe, Spalding, Walton), with a cor- of the spider and exaggerated claims of supposed en- rection of one county locality (Pike not Spalding) and venomations, there is a surprising paucity of informa- one addition (Paulding) in Gorham et al. (1969). A tion regarding its distribution in many states (Vetter nationwide map veriÞes brown recluse spiders in eight 2008). The southeastern margin of the endemic area of Georgia counties (adding Coweta, Douglas, Spalding) L. reclusa runs through central Georgia (Gertsch and (Cooperative Economic Insect Report 1971). Howell Ennik 1983, Swanson and Vetter 2005). It is readily (1974) lists 12 counties (adding Butts, Cobb, Gordon, found in Tennessee to the north and Alabama to the Henry, and Troup but omitting Oglethorpe) from west (Cooperative Economic Insect Report 1971, Vet- which brown recluse spiders have been recovered. In ter 2008) but is not native to nor often found in Florida the most recent taxonomic revision of the genus, to the south (Vetter et al. 2004). Therefore, brown Gertsch and Ennik (1983) mentioned that specimens recluse spiders are likely to be native to north Georgia were collected from 12 Georgia counties but list only but absent in the southern portions, with a zone of 2 (Cobb, Henry). Swanson and Vetter (2005) showed attrition somewhere in between. the range of the brown recluse as including the north- western portion of Georgia based on the sparse infor- mation mentioned above. Reports of envenomations from brown recluse spi- 1 Corresponding author: Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 (e-mail: [email protected]). ders, both diagnoses by the medical community and 2 Division of Biology, San Bernardino County Museum, Redlands, self-assessments by the nonmedical general public, CA 92373. occur throughout North America despite the rarity or 3 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA nonexistence of the spider over much of the continent 30602. 4 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, GrifÞn Cam- (Vetter and Bush 2002b, Vetter et al. 2003, 2004, Ben- pus, GrifÞn, GA 30223. nett and Vetter 2004, Swanson and Vetter 2005, Frith- 0022-2585/09/0015Ð0020$04.00/0 ᭧ 2009 Entomological Society of America 16 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 46, no. 1 sen et al. 2007, Vetter 2008). Medical authors cite From museums, one of us (R.S.V.) requested brown spider bite data from the annual report of poisonings recluse spider specimens (either the entire collection and injuries from the American Association of Poison if small or just Atlantic seaboard state specimens if the Control Centers (AAPCC) (see Vest 1996 for an ex- collection was large) from the following: American ample). Although AAPCC data are fairly reliable for Museum of Natural History (New York, NY), National conditions where the causative agent is readily deter- Museum of Natural History (i.e., Smithsonian; Wash- minable (e.g., snake bite, acetaminophen poisoning), ington, DC), Field Museum of Natural History (Chi- the data for spider bite reports are virtually useless cago, IL), California Academy of Sciences (San Fran- (Vetter and Furbee 2006). For example, Florida has no cisco, CA), Denver Museum of Nature and Science native Loxosceles populations of any species and Þnds (Denver, CO), Florida State Collection of Arthropods are both very rare and highly circumscribed. How- (Gainesville, FL), Burke Museum of Natural History ever, from a 6-yr AAPCC database from the three (Seattle, WA), and Clemson University Arthropod Florida poison centers, 85% of the 844 reports of Museum (Clemson, SC). The Georgia Museum of Loxosceles envenomations were made by nonmedical Natural History was also searched. personnel and originated from Ϸ75% of its counties Putative spider bite data were procured from the (Vetter et al. 2004). Unfortunately, medical authors Georgia Poison Center, which provided a 5-yr data set incorrectly use the AAPCC data set to substantiate for brown recluse bite reports in Georgia. The infor- brown recluse spider presence in an area by virtue of mation included data of bite report, county if known, bite reports without realizing that the general public and age and sex of the alleged bite victim. However, makes the majority of the reports to poison centers. this data set did not provide sufÞcient data breakdown Because of the high proÞle status of the brown to separate categories between medical and nonmed- recluse spider and the overdiagnoses of Loxosceles ical sources as was done in other studies for Florida bites by medical personnel from areas of North Amer- (Vetter et al. 2004) and Pennsylvania (Vetter et al., ica lacking the spiders, we performed a survey in unpublished data). Georgia to determine the distribution of the spider in greater detail than has been attempted before. We also Results compared the known distribution and quantity of Loxosceles spiders in Georgia to a 5-yr database for bite We provide evidence of brown recluse spiders in 31 reports made in the state. (19.5%) of GeorgiaÕs 159 counties (Table 1; Fig. 1), with almost all Þnds being restricted to the northern third of the state. Published records indicate brown recluse spiders being veriÞed in 13 counties; we un- Materials and Methods covered L. reclusa in 23 counties, 18 of which were Spider specimens were procured from various previously not listed as having these spiders. Although sources. In 2002, a website was established on the it would be more informative to present information Department of Entomology webpage at the University such as the number of recluse spiders found per of Georgia announcing the Georgia Brown Recluse county compared with the total number of spiders Project and the desire for spider submissions. One of submitted, this is not feasible considering the varied us (N.C.H.) presented seminars to the pest control methods by which the data were generated. Addition- industry throughout Georgia soliciting submissions ally, because of the low Þnal number of recluses (Ϸ100 and, through the media (radio and newspaper inter- specimens), percentages of spiders per county would views), requesting samples from the general public. vary wildly and provide almost no coherent biological Another author (L.M.A.) is the arthropod identiÞca- meaning. tion specialist at the diagnostic laboratory of the Geor- One submission was a male L. reclusa involved in a gia Experiment Station of the University of Georgia veriÞed bite incident near Rome (Floyd County). and receives arthropods from throughout the state. Brown recluse spiders have been veriÞed in two lo- Several Loxosceles datapoints were recovered from the cations from the southern half of Georgia. One site was Distance Diagnostics through Digital Imaging system, a woodworking shop in Brunswick (Glynn County) which is a mechanism for University of Georgia ex- with several specimens collected (transported lumber tension specialists to submit electronic images and from Alabama was the suspected mechanism of move- obtain quick identiÞcations. Records are stored in a ment) and the other, from Warner Robins (Houston permanent database; Loxosceles records were re- County), was intercepted from household goods be- trieved along with collection information. Additional ing unpacked by a couple who had moved from Ten- data were generated by a 5-yr study that offered to nessee. Many of the county records that we present identify any spider thought to be a brown recluse here are Þnds of single specimens, each being the only (Vetter 2005).
Recommended publications
  • Katsushika Hokusai and a Poetics of Nostalgia
    ACCESS: CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN EDUCATION 2015, VOL. 33, NO. 1, 33–46 https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.964158 Katsushika Hokusai and a Poetics of Nostalgia David Bell College of Education, University of Otago ABSTRACT KEYWORDS This article addresses the activation of aesthetics through the examination of cultural memory, Hokusai, an acute sensitivity to melancholy and time permeating the literary and ukiyo-e, poetic allusion, nostalgia, mono no aware pictorial arts of Japan. In medieval court circles, this sensitivity was activated through a pervasive sense of aware, a poignant reflection on the pathos of things. This sensibility became the motivating force for court verse, and ARTICLE HISTORY through this medium, for the mature projects of the ukiyo-e ‘floating world First published in picture’ artist Katsushika Hokusai. Hokusai reached back to aware sensibilities, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2015, Vol. 47, No. 6, subjects and conventions in celebrations of the poetic that sustained cultural 579–595 memories resonating classical lyric and pastoral themes. This paper examines how this elegiac sensibility activated Hokusai’s preoccupations with poetic allusion in his late representations of scholar-poets and the unfinished series of Hyakunin isshu uba-ga etoki, ‘One hundred poems, by one hundred poets, explained by the nurse’. It examines four works to explain how their synthesis of the visual and poetic could sustain aware themes and tropes over time to maintain a distinctive sense of this aesthetic sensibility in Japan. Introduction: Mono no aware How can an aesthetic sensibility become an activating force in and through poetic and pictorial amalgams of specific cultural histories and memories? This article examines how the poignant aesthetic sensibility of mono no aware (a ‘sensitivity to the pathos of things’) established a guiding inflection for social engagements of the Heian period (794–1185CE) Fujiwara court in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Practice
    THE JOURNAL OF FAMILY ONLINE EXCLUSIVE PRACTICE Paul K. Carlton, Jr, MD, Brown recluse spider bite? FACS The Texas A&M University Consider this uniquely Health Science Center College Station, Tex conservative treatment [email protected] An antihistamine and observation work as well— and often better—than more intensive therapies. Practice recommendations oped it in 4 phases, which I describe in • Be concerned about brown recluse this article. Not only does this conser- envenomation when a patient vative approach consistently heal con- reports intensifying localized firmed brown recluse bite wounds, but pain disproportionate to physical should a bite be mistakenly attributed findings after a “bite” (C). to the brown recluse (or one of its rela- tives in the Loxosceles genus of spider), • Prescribe an oral antihistamine there is no harm to the patient, nor any alone to control symptoms, even big expense. with a necrotic wound, and mark the IN THIS ARTICLE patient’s progress over 24 hours (C). z Spider bite z Is a brown recluse • If the patient improves dramatically, to blame? or MRSA? continue the antihistamine; with little Due to limited experience among the Page E6 or no improvement, consider giving an wider medical community in identifying antibiotic with the antihistamine (C). spider envenomation,1-4 bite recognition and selection of appropriate therapy can Strength of recommendation (SOR) be difficult. A Good-quality patient-oriented evidence Early findings can be confusing. B Inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence C Consensus, usual practice, opinion, disease-oriented Brown recluse bites typically feel like a evidence, case series pin prick.
    [Show full text]
  • From Grasping to Emptiness – Excursions Into the Thought-World of the Pāli Discourses (2)
    From Grasping to Emptiness – Excursions into the Thought-world of the Pāli Discourses (2) Anālayo © 2010 Anālayo Published by The Buddhist Association of the United States 2020 Route 301, Carmel, New York 10512 Printed in Taiwan Cover design by Laurent Dhaussy ISBN 978-0-615-25529-3 Introduction 3 1. Grasping / Upādāna 5 1.1 Grasping at Sensual Pleasures 5 1.2 Grasping at Views 7 1.3 Grasping at Rules and Observances 9 1.4 Grasping at a Doctrine of Self 10 1.5 The Five Aggregates [Affected by] Clinging 13 1.6 Grasping and Nibbāna 15 1.7 Freedom from Grasping 16 2. Personality View / Sakkāyadihi 19 2.1 Manifestations of Personality View 19 2.2 Removal of Personality View 24 3. Right View / Sammādihi 27 3.1 Wrong View 27 3.2 Right View and Investigation 29 3.3 Right View as the Forerunner of the Path 31 3.4 Arrival at Right View 33 3.5 Right View and the Four Noble Truths 34 4. Volitional Formations / Sakhārā 39 4.1 Sakhāras as an Aggregate 40 4.2 Sakhāras as a Link in Dependent Arising 44 4.3 Sakhāras in General 48 5. Thought / Vitakka 55 5.1 The Ethical Perspective on Thought 56 5.2 The Arising of Thought 57 5.3 The Vitakkasahāna-sutta 60 5.4 Vitakka in Meditation 64 5.5 Thought Imagery 66 6. Wise Attention / Yoniso Manasikāra 69 6.1 Wise ( Yoniso ) 69 6.2 Attention ( Manasikāra ) 72 6.3 The Implications of Wise Attention 72 6.4 The Importance of Wise Attention 78 7.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT of MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JEFFREY D. BRIDGES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. )
    Case: 4:06-cv-01200-ERW Doc. #: 16 Filed: 07/26/07 Page: 1 of 40 PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JEFFREY D. BRIDGES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case number 4:06cv1200 ERW ) TCM MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of Social Security,1 ) ) Defendant. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of Michael Astrue, the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner"), denying Jeffrey D. Bridges disability insurance benefits ("DIB") under Title II of the Social Security Act ("the Act"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433. Plaintiff has filed a brief in support of his complaint; the Commissioner has filed a brief in support of his answer. The case was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for a review and recommended disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Procedural History Jeffrey D. Bridges ("Plaintiff") applied for DIB in December 2003, alleging he was disabled as of January 2000 by Wegener's disease, stress, aches and pains, memory loss, 1Mr. Astrue was sworn in as the Commissioner of Social Security on February 12, 2007, and is hereby substituted as defendant pursuant to Rule 25(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Case: 4:06-cv-01200-ERW Doc. #: 16 Filed: 07/26/07 Page: 2 of 40 PageID #: <pageID> depression, high blood pressure, and anxiety. (R. at 48-50.)2 This application was denied initially and after a hearing held in November 2004 before Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") James B.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analyses of Venoms from American and African Sicarius Spiders That Differ in Sphingomyelinase D Activity
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Toxicon 55 (2010) 1274–1282 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Toxicon journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/toxicon Comparative analyses of venoms from American and African Sicarius spiders that differ in sphingomyelinase D activity Pamela A. Zobel-Thropp*, Melissa R. Bodner 1, Greta J. Binford Department of Biology, Lewis and Clark College, 0615 SW Palatine Hill Road, Portland, OR 97219, USA article info abstract Article history: Spider venoms are cocktails of toxic proteins and peptides, whose composition varies at Received 27 August 2009 many levels. Understanding patterns of variation in chemistry and bioactivity is funda- Received in revised form 14 January 2010 mental for understanding factors influencing variation. The venom toxin sphingomyeli- Accepted 27 January 2010 nase D (SMase D) in sicariid spider venom (Loxosceles and Sicarius) causes dermonecrotic Available online 8 February 2010 lesions in mammals. Multiple forms of venom-expressed genes with homology to SMase D are expressed in venoms of both genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Depression in Men: a Qualitative Investigation
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Nursing College of Nursing 2015 Factors Influencing Depression in Men: A Qualitative Investigation Lori A. Mutiso University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Mutiso, Lori A., "Factors Influencing Depression in Men: A Qualitative Investigation" (2015). Theses and Dissertations--Nursing. 15. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/nursing_etds/15 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Nursing at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Nursing by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I agree that the document mentioned above may be made available immediately for worldwide access unless an embargo applies.
    [Show full text]
  • Approach and Management of Spider Bites for the Primary Care Physician
    Osteopathic Family Physician (2011) 3, 149-153 Approach and management of spider bites for the primary care physician John Ashurst, DO,a Joe Sexton, MD,a Matt Cook, DOb From the Departments of aEmergency Medicine and bToxicology, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA. KEYWORDS: Summary The class Arachnida of the phylum Arthropoda comprises an estimated 100,000 species Spider bite; worldwide. However, only a handful of these species can cause clinical effects in humans because many Black widow; are unable to penetrate the skin, whereas others only inject prey-specific venom. The bite from a widow Brown recluse spider will produce local symptoms that include muscle spasm and systemic symptoms that resemble acute abdomen. The bite from a brown recluse locally will resemble a target lesion but will develop into an ulcerative, necrotic lesion over time. Spider bites can be prevented by several simple measures including home cleanliness and wearing the proper attire while working outdoors. Although most spider bites cause only local tissue swelling, early species identification coupled with species-specific man- agement may decrease the rate of morbidity associated with bites. © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. More than 100,000 species of spiders are found world- homes and yards in the southwestern United States, and wide. Persons seeking medical attention as a result of spider related species occur in the temperate climate zones across bites is estimated at 50,000 patients per year.1,2 Although the globe.2,5 The second, Lactrodectus, or the common almost all species of spiders possess some level of venom, widow spider, are found in both temperate and tropical 2 the majority are considered harmless to humans.
    [Show full text]
  • From Grasping to Emptiness – Excursions Into the Thought-World of the Pāli Discourses (2)
    From Grasping to Emptiness – Excursions into the Thought-world of the Pāli Discourses (2) Anālayo © 2010 Anālayo Published by The Buddhist Association of the United States 2020 Route 301, Carmel, New York 10512 Printed in Taiwan Cover design by Laurent Dhaussy ISBN 978-0-615-25529-3 Introduction 3 1. Grasping / Upādāna 5 1.1 Grasping at Sensual Pleasures 5 1.2 Grasping at Views 7 1.3 Grasping at Rules and Observances 9 1.4 Grasping at a Doctrine of Self 10 1.5 The Five Aggregates [Affected by] Clinging 13 1.6 Grasping and Nibbāna 15 1.7 Freedom from Grasping 16 2. Personality View / Sakkāyadihi 19 2.1 Manifestations of Personality View 19 2.2 Removal of Personality View 24 3. Right View / Sammādihi 27 3.1 Wrong View 27 3.2 Right View and Investigation 29 3.3 Right View as the Forerunner of the Path 31 3.4 Arrival at Right View 33 3.5 Right View and the Four Noble Truths 34 4. Volitional Formations / Sakhārā 39 4.1 Sakhāras as an Aggregate 40 4.2 Sakhāras as a Link in Dependent Arising 44 4.3 Sakhāras in General 48 5. Thought / Vitakka 55 5.1 The Ethical Perspective on Thought 56 5.2 The Arising of Thought 57 5.3 The Vitakkasahāna-sutta 60 5.4 Vitakka in Meditation 64 5.5 Thought Imagery 66 6. Wise Attention / Yoniso Manasikāra 69 6.1 Wise ( Yoniso ) 69 6.2 Attention ( Manasikāra ) 72 6.3 The Implications of Wise Attention 72 6.4 The Importance of Wise Attention 78 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Toni Morrison's Beloved
    ================================================================= Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 Vol. 18:4 April 2018 India’s Higher Education Authority UGC Approved List of Journals Serial Number 49042 ================================================================ Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Toni Morrison’s Beloved Nidhin Johny, M.Phil. Research Scholar and Subin P. S., Ph.D. Scholar ================================================================== Courtesy: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/117647/beloved-by-toni- morrison/9780307264886/ Abstract Experiencing trauma is an inevitable part of human life, we must go through extremely difficult situation though we like it or not. History is painted in blood. Literature provides an amble medium for venting out certain emotions. Human beings are exposed to worst situation in the course of history and most of the rational race has come out of it without unaltered mental and spiritual sanctity. But not all of them were lucky despite the human ability to adapt and survive some traumatic experience has shaken up the whole composition of physical mental and psychological wellbeing of these people. Post- traumatic stress disorder gives a theoretical framework on how people’s conception of the world and themselves and how personal and shared experience are intertwined. In Toni Morrison’s Beloved we see the psychological effect of the personal and collective trauma of slavery. Each of the characters though out of slavery are still haunted by the ghosts of their past, their ================================================================= Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 18:4 April 2018 Nidhin Johny, M.Phil. Research Scholar and Subin P. S., Ph.D. Scholar Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Toni Morrison’s Beloved 221 bodies are emancipated their minds still carries the burden of memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Note on Suspected Brown Recluse Spiders (Araneae: Sicariidae) in South Carolina
    Faculty Research Note Note on Suspected Brown Recluse Spiders (Araneae: Sicariidae) in South Carolina Robert J. Wolff* South University, 9 Science Court, Columbia, SC 29203 The general public believes that brown recluse spiders (Loxosceles Filistatidae (Kukulcania hibernalis) 22 specimens reclusa) are widespread where they live and that these spiders are Lycosidae 21 (3 in one package, 5 in another) frequent causes of bites resulting in dermonecrosis. Research over the Pholcidae 17 past twenty years shows these reports to be unfounded. Vetter (2005) Miturgidae 8 examined 1,773 specimens sent in from across the U.S. as brown recluse Theridiidae 8 spiders and no specimens were found from areas outside the species Agelenidae 7 range, with the exception of a specimen from California. Araneidae 6 Clubionidae 6 The reported range of the brown recluse spider includes all or major Thomisidae 6 portions of Arkansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana, Alabama, Tennessee, Gnaphosidae 4 Kentucky, Illinois, Missouri and Kansas. Minor portions of the brown Corinnidae 3 recluse range were previously reported in Iowa, Indiana, Ohio, New Philodromidae 3 Mexico, North Carolina, Georgia, and South Carolina. The most recent Amaurobiidae 1 map (Vetter, 2015) does not include South Carolina, and only the far Pisauridae 1 western tip of North Carolina and northwestern corner of Georgia. Scytodidae (Scytodes thoracica) 1 Unidentifiable 4 Schuman and Caldwell (1991) found that South Carolina physicians reported treating 478 cases of brown recluse spider envenomations in 1990 alone. This seems like a very high number, unfortunately all or No brown recluses were identified from the specimens obtained in this almost all of these are probably not brown recluse spider bites.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Kansas Spiders
    A Pocket Guide to Common Kansas Spiders By Hank Guarisco Photos by Hank Guarisco Funded by Westar Energy Green Team, American Arachnological Society and the Chickadee Checkoff Published by the Friends of the Great Plains Nature Center i Table of Contents Introduction • 2 Arachnophobia • 3 Spider Anatomy • 4 House Spiders • 5 Hunting Spiders • 5 Venomous Spiders • 6-7 Spider Webs • 8-9 Other Arachnids • 9-12 Species accounts • 13 Texas Brown Tarantula • 14 Brown Recluse • 15 Northern Black Widow • 16 Southern & Western Black Widows • 17-18 Woodlouse Spider • 19 Truncated Cellar Spider • 20 Elongated Cellar Spider • 21 Common Cellar Spider • 22 Checkered Cobweb Weaver • 23 Quasi-social Cobweb Spider • 24 Carolina Wolf Spider • 25 Striped Wolf Spider • 26 Dotted Wolf Spider • 27 Western Lance Spider • 28 Common Nurseryweb Spider • 29 Tufted Nurseryweb Spider • 30 Giant Fishing Spider • 31 Six-spotted Fishing Spider • 32 Garden Ghost Spider Cover Photo: Cherokee Star-bellied Orbweaver ii Eastern Funnelweb Spider • 33 Eastern and Western Parson Spiders • 34 Garden Ghost Spider • 35 Bark Crab Spider • 36 Prairie Crab Spider • 37 Texas Crab Spider • 38 Black-banded Crab Spider • 39 Ridge-faced Flower Spider • 40 Striped Lynx Spider • 41 Black-banded Common and Convict Zebra Spiders • 42 Crab Spider Dimorphic Jumping Spider • 43 Bold Jumping Spider • 44 Apache Jumping Spider • 45 Prairie Jumping Spider • 46 Emerald Jumping Spider • 47 Bark Jumping Spider • 48 Puritan Pirate Spider • 49 Eastern and Four-lined Pirate Spiders • 50 Orchard Spider • 51 Castleback Orbweaver • 52 Triangulate Orbweaver • 53 Common & Cherokee Star-bellied Orbweavers • 54 Black & Yellow Garden Spider • 55 Banded Garden Spider • 56 Marbled Orbweaver • 57 Eastern Arboreal Orbweaver • 58 Western Arboreal Orbweaver • 59 Furrow Orbweaver • 60 Eastern Labyrinth Orbweaver • 61 Giant Long-jawed Orbweaver • 62 Silver Long-jawed Orbweaver • 63 Bowl and Doily Spider • 64 Filmy Dome Spider • 66 References • 67 Pocket Guides • 68-69 1 Introduction This is a guide to the most common spiders found in Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Recluse Spider Spider Control
    needed to repair the damage caused by the bite. There may be other causes for what appears to be a brown recluse bite such as a bacterial infection rown Recluse Spider or a skin disease. Spiders Brown recluse spiders (Loxoceles reclusa) Brown recluse bites are rarely fatal, but if you think B you have been bitten by a brown recluse spider, are usually light to medium brown in color with a darker violin-shaped marking on their back. see a doctor as soon as possible. Save the spider The base of the violin marking is near the head, if possible, and bring it with you to the doctor. with the neck of the violin pointing toward the Treatment may include a tetanus shot, antibiotics, abdomen. Their bodies are about a quarter of an steroids or certain other medications that prevent inch in length, and the thin legs about one inch the wound from expanding. Removing skin around long. Unlike most spiders, which have eight eyes, the bite may be helpful, if done soon after the bite. the brown recluse has six eyes. As the name implies, brown recluse spiders like to live in dark, protected areas. They can live outdoors pider Control or indoors. In North Carolina, they are most likely It is best to leave spiders alone as they are to be found in a house or storage building. The S typically harmless to people and can even be beneficial. brown recluse builds a small, flat mat of silk in The best way to keep spiders out of your house is to keep which it hides.
    [Show full text]