Road Map Improving Coordination for Primary and Secondary Infrastructure
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ROAD MAP IMPROVING COORDINATION FOR PRIMARY AND SECONDARY INFRASTRUCTURE Dissemination level: WP: 3 “INSTITUTIONAL PLATFORM AND ADMINISTRATIVE COOPERATION” Author (s): A.U.TH. Status (F: final, D: draft): D Date: DECEMBER 2014 File name: ACROSSEE_3.1.9_final ROAD MAP IMPROVING COORDINATION FOR ACROSSEE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY INFRASTRUCTURE DISCLAIMER This document is property of the ACROSSEE project and its partners. In any case if you are interested to extract some pages from this Publication you have to mention the source: SEE/D/0093/3.3/X_ACROSSEE project, Transnational Cooperation Programme South East Europe. The publication/document reflects the author’s views and the Managing Authority is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Without derogation from the generality of the information of this document, the Managing Authority, the project partners, their officers, employees, agents and contractors shall not be liable for any direct or indirect or consequential loss or damage caused by or arising from any information or inaccuracy or omission herein and shall be not liable for any use of the information contained in this document. page 2 of 37 ROAD MAP IMPROVING COORDINATION FOR ACROSSEE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY INFRASTRUCTURE Table of Contents 1 Executive summary .................................................................................................................................. 5 2 Scope of Action ........................................................................................................................................ 6 3 Methodology............................................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 Considerations on methodology definition ...................................................................................... 8 3.2 Followed approach ............................................................................................................................. 9 4 Obstacles for better performance of secondary/ regional networks .............................................. 13 4.1 Results of ACROSSEE relevant outputs ............................................................................................. 13 4.2 Inputs from Project Partners .............................................................................................................. 17 4.3 Potentials for improvement of regional/international accessibility and mobility ..................... 26 5 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................. 35 References ..................................................................................................................................................... 37 page 3 of 37 ROAD MAP IMPROVING COORDINATION FOR ACROSSEE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY INFRASTRUCTURE List of Figures Δεν βρέθηκαν καταχωρήσεις πίνακα εικόνων. List of Tables TABLE 1. ACROSSEE PARTNERS INPUT PROVISION FOR THE CURRENT REPORT .....................................................11 page 4 of 37 ROAD MAP IMPROVING COORDINATION FOR ACROSSEE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY INFRASTRUCTURE 1 Executive summary The present report “Road Map for improving coordination for primary and secondary infrastructure” has been elaborated according to the description of the activities of Work Package (WP) 3 in the approved Application Form (AF) and Implementation Plan of the ACROSSE project. Specifically, it constitutes a specific output defined in the AF, corresponding to one of the Deliverables foreseen for Action 3.1 and specifically Output 3.1.9. The purpose of this Activity according to the AF is to improve coordination in promoting, planning and operation for primary and secondary infrastructure with the overall aim to promote accessibility in South East Europe (SEE). The main objective of the report is to present the existing situation regarding secondary networks condition and performance and investigate means of their promotion towards better accessibility. It is based on relevant results of the analysis of other technical WPs of the project (WP 4 and 5), the outcomes of WP3 Actions (WP3.1.4-7), information provided from the ACROSSEE Project Partners (PPs) and results of other projects. The structure of the report was agreed through several project and Core Group of PPs meetings. After the current introductory chapter, in the second chapter of the report is presented the scope of the Action and basic considerations regarding “accessibility”. In the third chapter are presented the methodology followed and the activities undertaken and in the fourth chapter the obstacles identified in the region for better coordination and performance of secondary/ regional transport networks, on the basis of the opinions provided by the project partners, per country. Then in the fifth chapter are identified the potentials for improvement of the regional/international accessibility and mobility, i.e. the basis for the formulation of the conclusions of chapter 6, as a Road Map for coordinated development and performance of secondary infrastructure. page 5 of 37 ROAD MAP IMPROVING COORDINATION FOR ACROSSEE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY INFRASTRUCTURE 2 Scope of Action SEE Transnational Cooperation Programme Priority 3 is dedicated to the Improvement of Accessibility. ACROSSEE project contributes to this aim through analysing the existing situation of transport links and nodes in the SEE region and various future scenarios of development, focusing on the border crossings improvement and coordination of projects and investments. The development of the Trans-European Networks and the major trans-national corridors in the region, Core Network Corridors and former Pan-European Corridors and Routes in the Western Balkans SEETO Comprehensive Networks, in combination with the need of many and major projects, the great volume of investment requirements, in contrast with the scarcity of funds, normally create the conditions for the national governments to focus on primary networks development and endangers the neglecting short term rehabilitation and maintenance requirements on the secondary network. As correctly expressed in a draft position paper of the European Union Road Federation contributing to the report of the extension of TEN-T for Networks for Peace and Development (EC, 2005), investment schemes should be balanced and should “take into account the socio-economic aspirations of citizens of the Region in addition to long-term European integration objectives” (ERF-CCBLSEE, 2006). The EU Territorial Agenda 2020 under the chapter 5 of the territorial priorities for EU development “Improving territorial connectivity for individuals, communities and enterprises” declares that “further development of Trans-European networks (TEN-T) linking the main European centres, such as capitals, metropolitan regions and TEN-nodes and improving linkages between primary and secondary systems should be an essential component of the integrated network. Development of secondary networks is important, especially at regional and local level” (EU, 2011). page 6 of 37 ROAD MAP IMPROVING COORDINATION FOR ACROSSEE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY INFRASTRUCTURE This has been a renewed aim further to the EU Territorial Agenda of 2007 which stressed the importance of efficient secondary networks linking with respective hinterland areas (EU, 2007). Action 3.1.9 in the framework of ACROSSEE focuses on the improvement of coordination in planning and operation of primary and secondary infrastructure to improve accessibility. These improvements include, inter alia, better planning for upgrade of infrastructure and services of feeder lines, ensuring efficient connections of ports to the railway network, the definition, hierarchy and integration of intermodal nodes and hubs in WB/ SEE, given the fact that TEN-T indicative maps for Western Balkans do not provide such information. page 7 of 37 ROAD MAP IMPROVING COORDINATION FOR ACROSSEE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY INFRASTRUCTURE 3 Methodology The methodology followed for the elaboration of the current report has been defined by the overall methodology developed by the Core Group of ACROSSEE partners for the elaboration of WP3. This chapter presents the methodology for the elaboration of Action 3.1.9. It briefly describes the approach developed on the basis of the scope of the Action, as described in the previous chapter. 3.1 Considerations on methodology definition On the basis of several meetings and the proposal of the responsible partner for Action 3.1.9 (A.U.Th), several issues were defined to be addressed in the framework of this action. The most important issues were reflected in the questions, which deemed to have answers coming from the results of the other project activities, i.e. the transport model (WP4) and the cross borders analysis (WP5): Which are the obstacles for better regional accessibility and mobility? Which are the missing links, in terms of infrastructure and offered services? Which are the main feeder lines of the Core Network in the region? Which are the multimodal nodal points/ hubs of national and regional importance? Which are the bottlenecks? Furthermore, with relation to the above and the other actions of WP3, several other questions were formulated, in terms of providing their relevant outcomes in relation to: a) what’s expected in the various scenarios examined in WP4 (in terms of infrastructure