DOCSLIB.ORG

Xerox University Microfilms

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Xerox University Microfilms INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, author and specific pages you wish reproduced. 5. PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print. Filmed as received. Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 75-6513 FINLEY, Robert Lewis, 1942- AN ECONOMIC HISTORY OF THE IMPERIAL VALLEY OF CALIFORNIA TO 1971. The University of Oklahoma, Ph.D., 1974 Economics, general Xerox University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan 4sio6 THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED. THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE AN ECONOMIC HISTORY OF THE IMPERIAL VALLEY OF CALIFORNIA TO 1971 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY ROBERT L. FINLEY Norman, Oklahoma 1974 AN ECONOMIC HISTORY OF THE IMPERIAL VALLEY OF CALIFORNIA TO 1971 APPROVED BY DISSERTATION COMMITTEE ABSTRACT The economic development of the Imperial Valley of California is unique in the history of agricultural areas in the United States. Blessed with a virtual 365 day growing season, an abundance of water diverted from the Colorado River via the All-American Canal and a series of irrigation channels, and a reliable labor supply from Mexico, Imperial County annually ranks in the top five counties in the United States in terms of value in agri­ cultural production. There is an optimal size of an agricultural unit in the Imperial Valley depending on what the individual farm produces. The Federal Reclamation Act of 1902, how­ ever, placed a 160 acre land limitation on all farms re­ ceiving water from Federally sponsored reclamation pro­ jects throughout the United States. Since water was avail­ able in the Imperial Valley from the Alamo Canal before 1902, the Act of 1902 was never seriously enforced there, although throughout the years, several attempts were made to enforce it. A 160 acre farm in the Imperial Valley is far from being large enough to realize economies of scale, regardless of what is produced on the farm. A sizeable number of studies by prominent agricultural experts have demonstrated that economies of scale exist for most operating agricultural units of more than 1,500 acres. Depending on the quality of land, some crop and livestock operations do not become economically optimal until they reach approximately 2,500 acres. In 1933 the U. S. Department of Interior, when pressed for an opinion regarding the applicability of the 160 acre land limitation law to the Imperial Valley ruled that the Act of 1902 did not apply. In 1964 the Depart­ ment reversed itself and the controversy was not settled until 1971 when a United States Federal District Court decided that due to a long period of non-enforcement, the 160 acre limitation did not apply to the Imperial Valley. I l l ACKNOWLEDGMENT A number of people contributed to this disser­ tation. The continuous encouragement provided by Professor Thomas D. Curtis, Chairman of my committee, is very sincerely appreciated. I also wish to express thanks to Professors Arnold Parr, Jim Reese, Paul Brinker and John Hodgson who formed the rest of my committee. In addition I wish to thank agricultural economists Harold Carter, Gerald Dean, Warren Johnston, Herbert Snyder, and C. V. Moore. The research of these men and many of their colleagues significantly improved the study. Many local officials in the Imperial Valley spent large amounts of time assisting me in my personal research. These men include R. F. Carter, H. P. Crow, R. T. De Cristofaro, W. C. Dickey, F. W. Flanagan, Peter Rodens, William Simpson and Adolph Van Maren. For their combined efforts, I am grateful. Very special thanks go to my parents who were an inspiration to me throughout all of my years of formal education. IV TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ................................. ix LIST OF CHARTS ..................................... xi LIST OF F I G U R E S ....................................... XÜ Chapter I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE IMPERIAL VALLEY 10 Land Policies in Colonial America .... 13 Effect of Revolutionary War . ........... 14 Early Policy of Disposing of the Public Domain.................................. 15 The Land Acts, 1796-1862 ............... 17 Irrigating the Imperial Valley ........ 20 The Aftermath of the 1902 Reclamation Act 25 Early Legal Tests of the 160 Acre Land Controversy ............................ 27 Labor in the Imperial Valley ...... 28 Factors Contributing to Unity Among Mexicans and Mexican Americans .... 30 The Effects of a Changing Agricultural Technology ............................ 32 Problems With Mexico ................... 34 Problems With Excess Salt in the Imperial Valley ................................. 35 Electric Power in the Imperial Valley . 38 A Drive to Consolidation of Power Countries ................................ 43 III. A LEGAL HISTORY OF THE 160 ACRE LAND LIMITA­ TION POLICY AS IT APPLIES TO THE IMPERIAL VALLEY OF CALIFORNIA ................... 50 The Federal Reclamation Act of 1902 . 50 Attempts to Monopolize and Speculate in L a n d ................................. 52 V Chapter Page Section 4 of the Act of 1902 ............. 52 Section 5 of the Act of 1902 ............. 53 Early Administration of The Act of 1902 . 55 An Early Modification of The Act of 1902.. 56 The Fall-Davis Report of 1922 57 Other Notable Events in 1922 ............. 58 The Omnibus Adjustment Act of 1926 .... 60 Section 4 5 ....................... 60 Section 4 6 ....................... 61 Early Problems in Interpretation of Reclamation ....................... 63 The Emergence of Two Philosophies Con­ cerning Land Limitation on Federal Reclamation Projects ................... 64 The Boulder Canyon Project Act of 1928 . 64 The Wilbur L e t t e r .................. 68 The Malan C a s e ....................... 73 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law . 74 Finding No. 2 ....................... 74 Finding No. 3 1 ....................... 74 Finding No. 3 5 ....................... 74 Finding No. 3 8 ....................... 75 Conclusion XI of Malan A c t ............... 75 The State of Arizona, Complainant vs. Imperial Irrigation District et al, Defendants, United States of America, Intervenor, State of Nevada, Intervener, The Supreme Court of the United States . 76 Arizona's Position in the C a s e ........ 77 The Barry Opinion ..................... 79 The United States of America, Plaintiff, vs. the Imperial Irrigation District of California, Defendant, The State of California, Intervening Defendant . 82 IV. AN ANALYSIS OF SELECTED ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS IN THE IMPERIAL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ............ 87 Labor ................... 87 The International Commuter Phenomenon . 88 Population and Labor Force .............. 90 The Role of Mechanization................ 94 The Farm Family.......... 95 Attempts to Organize or Unionize Farm Workers in the Imperial Valley ........ 95 Employment Trends ....................... 113 Agriculture................................. 114 Non-Agriculture . 115 Employment Outlook ... 116 VI Chapter Page <? The Market Faced by the Imperial Valley F a r m e r .................................... 116 The Controversy Involving Electrical Rates .......................... 118 The Imperial Irrigation District's Response to Criticisms of Electrical Rate Irregu l a r i t i e s ..................... 121 Electric Power Rates— General ............ 121 Electric Power Rates— Agricultural .... 122 Absentee Landowners ...................... 124 Cost of Electricity if Hydro-Generations Were Not Available........................124 The Property Structure . ................. 125 Types of Land O w n e r s h i p ................... 127 Private Individual and Corporation Ownership........................ 129 Ownership and Quality of L a n d ............
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Colorado River Imperial Valley Soils
    THE COLORADO RIVER and IMPERIAL VALLEY SOILS I I ' ' '' ' ' '"' ' A CHRONICLE OF IMPERIAL VALLEY'S CONTINUING FIGHT AGAINST SALT FOREW ORD Elsewhere In the Untied States, soil conservation dlstricte - lormed as a result of referendum by landowners - are governed by an elected board ol directors. In Imperial Valley, Imperial lrriqatlon Dlatrict functions a.s the SoU Conservation District under a unique memorandum of aqreement with the U.S. Department of Aqr;culture. Soil conservotlon policy Ia ael by the District board which also aerves as a soli conservation board. Soil scl.ontlata. en91n..•r• and con&41rvatlonlsts provide technical assistance to farmers. Soil engineering lnforma1ton and survey da1a, prepared by either the liD or SCS, are freely interchanged. The Dlatrict provides clerical and office facllJUes lor SCS, as well as pub!Jc Information 01818tance. Silt and Salt Imperial Valley, the winter qreenhouse of the nation. has be&n oonqu.,rtng the pro!> !ems and obstacles tha1 have tendad to discourage Ita formers sin~ 1901. In 1900, thta was a bo11en deMrl. Wllh the construction ol a heading on the Colorado River, 60 mllos east ol the Valley, irrigation wa1er was brought lnto the thirsty d·-rt In 1901. This au~sful dlv"r slon ol water through o con ...... ~«-..l••·•t "' * or· VIIYOnc:e canol, many miles of which were In Mexico, was enJoyed (or the brief period of only four years before trouble developed. Looldnf eouth.. thl• oeriol •lew .atowa the beodworb of tl:•• AJI. A flood on the Colorado River washed out the control wor;ca Amenccm Cc:ma.L Tb• Colorado IU•tr ia ot left.
    [Show full text]
  • Earl Coffman Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt6199s0j9 No online items Earl Coffman Papers Jon M. Fletcher Agua Caliente Cultural Museum 901 E Tahquitz Canyon Way Ste C-204 Palm Springs, California 92262 Phone: (760) 778-1079 Fax: (760) 322-7724 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.accmuseum.org/ (c) 2009 Agua Caliente Cultural Museum. All rights reserved. Earl Coffman Papers 2006.046 1 Earl Coffman Papers Accession number: 2006.046 Agua Caliente Cultural Museum ACCM Archives Palm Springs, California Processed by: Jon M. Fletcher Date Completed: 04/13/2005 Encoded by: Jon M. Fletcher (c) 2009 Agua Caliente Cultural Museum. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Earl Coffman Papers Dates: 1923-1949 Accession number: 2006.046 Creator: Coffman, Earl Collector: Palm Springs Chamber of Commerce Collection Size: 2.1 linear feet500 items Repository: Agua Caliente Cultural Museum Palm Springs, California 92262 Abstract: Correspondence, telegrams, transcripts, and other documentation created and/or collected between the years 1923-1949, pertaining to relations between the Palm Springs Chamber of Commerce and the Agua Caliente Band of Mission Indians. The Indian Affairs Committee, a subcommittee of the Chamber of Commerce, was made up of non-Indian business owners who organized their interests through pooled resources. Phil Swing, the subcommittee's lawyer, pursued the group's interests at the national level in Washington D.C. Earl Coffman, son of Nellie Coffman, acted as president. Notable events recorded include the attempts of the Chamber of Commerce to seize control of the Indian Canyons and Agua Caliente Hot Spring on Section 14, the Indian Affairs Committee's demand for retraction of Indian Canyons entrance and horse riding fees, the arrest of the Agua Caliente Band's traditional leaders, the 1937 federal takeover of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, and other topics pertaining to tribal land rights and sovereignty.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Inventory for the Vega SES LLC Solar Additional 80-Acres Project, Imperial County, California
    Cultural Resource Inventory for the Vega SES LLC Solar Additional 80-Acres Project, Imperial County, California Prepared for: Vega SES, LLC 750 W. Main Street El Centro, California 92243 Prepared by: Joel Lennen, M.A., RPA ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2034 Corte del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 USGS 7.5-minute Mount Signal; approximately 80 acres Keywords: Imperial County, Mount Signal USGS 7.5’ Quad, West Mesa, West Side Main Canal, Fern Canal, Fig Drain, Wormwood Canal and Drain, Drew Road, PN 27970 December 2017 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ................................................................................ iii 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION .................................................................. 1 STUDY PERSONNEL .................................................................................................... 1 2. SETTING ......................................................................................................... 6 NATURAL SETTING ...................................................................................................... 6 Geology and Soils ...................................................................................................... 6 Climate ...................................................................................................................... 6 Topography ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Lining of the All-American Canal
    The Lining of the All American Canal: Effects on Mexico Construction of the All-American Canal, 1935 (top), 1939 (bottom), José Luis Castro-Ruiz and Vicente Sánchez- and 1936 (background). Courtesy of Munguía – El Colegio de la Frontera Norte U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. n 1988, the U.S. Congress approved 7.3 million acre-feet (maf) annually in Law 100-675, authorizing the equal parts, creating high expectations for Secretary of the Interior to line the the economic transformation of the region. All-American Canal (AAC) along a I The Alamo Canal experienced a number 23-mile section in the southern Imperial Valley of California. Lining the canal was of difficulties in the years that followed. expected to save an estimated 70,000 acre- An inability to control canal volumes from feet of water per year lost to seepage the Colorado River resulted in a series where the canal traverses sand dunes. The of floods from 1905 to 1907, affecting Mexican government quickly filed an the cities of Mexicali and Calexico and informal complaint through the Mexican agricultural areas on both sides of the section of the International Boundary and border, and creating the Salton Sea. These Water Commission (IBWC), claiming conditions, together with the dependence potential harm to water users in the of the canal operation on Mexican Most evident is a potential decrease in Mexicali Valley, and noting that the United policy changes, moved Imperial Valley static levels of the Mexicali Aquifer, States was legally obligated by Minute 242 users to lobby for their own access to which depends mostly on AAC seepage to notify Mexico of any changes affecting the Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • THE L\IIEXICALI VALLEY \VATER PROBLEM . Jol-IN C
    THE l\IIEXICALI VALLEY \VATER PROBLEM . JOl-IN c. ARCHBOLD San Diego City Schools The Mexicali Valley of Baja California has become a prime producer of cotton and one of the world's great processors of raw cotton. General argiculture has flourished, too. Like a phoenix arisen from the desert this region has been reclaimed from the arid conditions that have gripped the entire area since before the white man arrived. Now, salinity left in the soil by draining irrigation waters threatens to wipe out the progress of half a century. Only salt-tolerant cotton may survive conditions which have become an international issue. North of the border in the summer of 1961 the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation completed the vVellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District project. The $14,000,000 drainage system includes 70 deep drain­ age wells with pumps, and a 50-mile concrete-lined conveyance channel with an outfall on the Gila River above Yuma, Arizona (Figure 1). Drainage water being pumped in the Wellton-Mohawk system is not return Bow in the usual sense of the word, but water accumulated over a long period of tirrie as a result of interior drainage. From before the turn of the century until 1952, Wellton-Mohawk farmers depended upon underground flow of the Gila River for irrigation water.1 The quality of this water was uniformly so poor that it was disclosed in testimony before the United States Senate in 1945 that the irrigated area was down to 8,000 acres (as of 1943; later, even less was in crops) and that samples were taken showing a salt content of 12,000 parts per million.2 In 1952, Colorado River water became available with the completion of the Gila Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Law of the River the Colorado River Compact
    Colorado River Water Users Association: Law of the River . The Colorado River Compact . As the 20th century dawned, the The Colorado River Compact vast domain of the Colorado River lay almost entirely Boulder Canyon Project Act untouched. Though there had been a few early filings for Treaty with Mexico diversion and a "grand ditch" conveying water some 16 miles across the Continental Divide Upper Colorado River Basin into eastern Colorado in the late Compact of 1948 1800s, California's Imperial Valley was among the first areas to tap the river's true potential. In early 1901, the 60 mile long Alamo Canal, Colorado River Storage Project developed by private concerns, was completed to deliver Colorado Act River water for irrigation, and a wasteland was transformed. But the Imperial Valley did not move ahead without problems. About 50 miles Grand Canyon Protection Act of the canal coursed through Mexico, leaving the valley farmers at the mercy of a foreign government. And in 1905, the river, raging with Arizona vs. California floods, eroded the opening to the canal, roared through and created the Salton Sea before the river was pushed back into its normal channel. Future of Western Water With the constant threat of flood looming along the lower Colorado, demands grew for some sort of permanent flood control work -a storage reservoir and dam on the river. And Imperial Valley farmers called for a canal totally within the United States, free of Mexican interference. By 1919, Imperial Irrigation District had won the support of the federal Bureau of Reclamation. A bureau engineering board recommended favorably on the canal and added the government "should undertake the early construction of a storage reservoir on the drainage basin of the Colorado." While this report was greeted with enthusiasm by people along the river's lower stretches, it was viewed with alarm by those in upper reaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado River Slideshow Title TK
    The Colorado River: Lifeline of the Southwest { The Headwaters The Colorado River begins in the Rocky Mountains at elevation 10,000 feet, about 60 miles northwest of Denver in Colorado. The Path Snow melts into water, flows into the river and moves downstream. In Utah, the river meets primary tributaries, the Green River and the San Juan River, before flowing into Lake Powell and beyond. Source: Bureau of Reclamation The Path In total, the Colorado River cuts through 1,450 miles of mountains, plains and deserts to Mexico and the Gulf of California. Source: George Eastman House It was almost 1,500 years ago when humans first tapped the river. Since then, the water has been claimed, reclaimed, divided and subdivided many times. The river is the life source for seven states – Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming – as well as the Republic of Mexico. River Water Uses There are many demands for Colorado River water: • Agriculture and Livestock • Municipal and Industrial • Recreation • Fish/Wildlife and Habitat • Hydroelectricity • Tribes • Mexico Source: USGS Agriculture The Colorado River provides irrigation water to about 3.5 million acres of farmland – about 80 percent of its flows. Municipal Phoenix Denver About 15 percent of Colorado River flows provide drinking and household water to more than 30 million people. These cities include: Las Vegas and Phoenix, and cities outside the Basin – Denver, Albuquerque, Salt Lake City, Los Angeles, San Diego and Tijuana, Mexico. Recreation Source: Utah Office of Tourism Source: Emma Williams Recreation includes fishing, boating, waterskiing, camping and whitewater rafting in 22 National Wildlife Refuges, National Parks and National Recreation Areas along river.
    [Show full text]
  • Salton Sea Chronology a Salton Sea Chronology
    RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West \ / U.S. Department of the Interior -- Bureau of Reclamation January 2016 Mission Statement The Bureau of Reclamation manages, develops, and protects water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. A Salton Sea Chronology A Salton Sea Chronology (Prehistory-2015) Year Events 10,000 BC First recorded human habitation in the Salton Basin. (Approx) 700 AD Lake Cahuilla is formed in the Salton Basin when the Colorado River silts (Flood!) up its outlet to the Gulf of California and swings northward. Lake Cahuilla is subject to multiple wet and dry cycles over intervening years. 1500 Large inflow of the Colorado River water fills Lake Cahuilla to create a waterbody 26 (Flood!) times the size of the current Salton Sea. (The calcareous water line remains visible on the northwest mountains in the present day). 1840-1891 Multiple flood events from the Colorado River are recorded in the Salton Basin forming ephemeral lakes up to 100,000 acres. 1876 Executive Order of May 15, 1876, establishes the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indian Reservation with a grant of 640 acres (Torres Martinez Compact, 2003). 1891 Executive Order of December 19, 1891, pursuant to the Mission Indian Relief Act of 1891, expands the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indian Reservation approximately 12,000 acres on the northern side of the Salton Basin. 1892 New Liverpool Salt Company mines salt from a salt marsh centered west of the railroad station named “Salton”. 1901 California Development Company is contracted by a private entity to build a canal (the Alamo Canal) to deliver water by gravity flow from the Colorado River to irrigate the Imperial Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Jackson, Donald C
    DC Jackson, Lafayette College 2002 History Symposium Bureau of Reclamation Boulder Dam: Origins of Siting and Design Boulder/Hoover Dam is arguably both the most prominent structure ever built under the responsibility of the Bureau of Reclamation and the most famous dam in the world. Originally authorized as Boulder Dam, it was denoted Hoover Dam by Ray Lyman Wilbur (President Hoover’s Secretary of the Interior) in 1930; Harold Ickes (President Roosevelt’s Secretary of the Interior) reinstated the name Boulder Dam in 1933; finally., in 1947 Congress enacted legislation formally designating it as Hoover Dam, the name it still retains. Whatever the name, the actual structure was built in essential accord with plans developed in the early 1920s. The goal of this paper is simple. It documents: 1) why and when the decision was made to relocate the dam from Boulder Canyon (where it was originally proposed) to Black Canyon (where it was actually built); and 2) when the decision was made to adopt a massive, curved gravity concrete design for the structure. A prosaic goal, but worth undertaking because of the enormous importance of the dam both within the history of the Bureau and within the larger context of American technological development in the 20th century . Because this paper deals with events that occurred during a time the proposed structure was known as Boulder Dam, that is name used in the following discussion. Imperial Valley The origins of Boulder Dam lay in a privately-financed project to irrigate Southern California’s Imperial Valley. As conceived by the Colorado Development Company in the late 1890s, this scheme diverted water from the Colorado river for use on a huge tract of desert land just north of the California/Mexico border.
    [Show full text]
  • George Chaffey Enabled the Imperial Valley to Bloom
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 24, Number 13, March 21, 1997 3. Water desalination. Taking the salt out of seawater irrigated agricultural land in California has declined 10% is a technology that has been practiced on a limited scale since it reached its peak of 9.7 million acres in 1981. If for at least two decades. There are a number of desalination the Newt Gingriches and Pete Wilsons, and the London processes (electrodialysis membrane desalting, reverse os­ oligarchical financiers have their way, this will be slashed mosis, and so on), but one of the biggest stumbling blocks further. is making the process commercially feasible. While work The Flood of '97 demonstrates that it is not natural goes on in that area, one of the most crucial features is to occun'ences, but incorrect economic policies, that caused develop nuclear power, because desalination uses a large the vast majority of preventable damage. Rather than waiting amount of energy. Cheap nuclear power, delivered by high for the catastrophe of the next flood, and the news media's temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs), would help spur retailing of ridiculous tales about why it occurred, there is the process. a simple solution: Reverse the trend and put the emphasis But these solutions are not being pursued in the nation back on one of the best examples of man's creative develop­ or in California. In Figure 10, notice that the amount of ment-infrastructure. of the California Development Company. His job was to George Chaffey enabled develop a desert area in the extreme southeast tip of Cali­ the ImperialValley to bloom fornia, which borders Mexico to its south and Arizona to its east.
    [Show full text]
  • Coachella Valley Water District, Water and the Coachella Valley
    Water and the Coachella Valley Page 1 of 17 Coachella Valley Water District Water and the Coach ella Valley CATER AVA& jSTR1G [)L sort Springs Marriott entrance lake at dusk Photo by Robert Keerun CI'UD Public Relations Associate Table of contents • General District Overview • Water Conservation and Mana<iement • Stormwater Protection • Colorado River • Colorado River Distribution • Lake Cahuilla • Irrigation System • Farm Drainage • Salton 'yea • Urban Water Service • State Water Project • Water Reclamation General District Overview The Coachella Valley Water District was formed in January 1918 under the state water code http ://www.cvwd .org/water&cv .htm 2/5/01 Water and the Coachella Valley Page 2 of 17 provisions of the County Water District Act . A governing board of five members is elected from five general divisions for terms of four years each. Current directors are : Tellis Codekas . president ; Russell C. Kitahara, vice president ; John W. McFadden, Peter Nelson, and John Powell Jr . Tom Levy is general manager-chief engineer . Nearly 640,000 acres are within the district boundaries . Most of this land is in Riverside County, but the district also extends into Imperial and San Diego Counties . The district is involved in six water-related fields of service - irrigation water. domestic water, storniwater protection, agricultural drainage, wastewater reclamation and water conservation . Recreation and generation of energy have become by-products of some of these services . Headquarters for CVWD are located at Avenue 52 and Grapefruit Boulevard in the City of Coachella.The district's urban water functions are centered in Palm Desert at Hovely Lane and Waterway Road.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of the Coachella Valley
    The Story of the Making every drop count since 1918 1 Copyright @ 2018 by Coachella Valley Water District P.O. Box 1058 Coachella, CA 92236 All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this work in any form whatsoever without permission in writing, except for brief passages in connection with a review. CVWD General Manager: Jim Barrett CVWD Assistant General Manager: Robert Cheng Writer: Jeff Crider, Crider Public Relations Project Director: Diane Carmony Graphic artist: Angie Agostino, AgostinoCreative Proof readers: Maureen Perry, Kevin Hemp, Jamie Pricer Cover: Courtesy of CVWD archive photo Library of Congress Control Number: 2017962598 Table of Contents Acknowledgements Preface Introduction Chapter 1 Four Oases in the Wilderness Chapter 2 Date Gardens Bring the Romance of the Middle East to the Coachella Valley Chapter 3 Origins of Coachella Valley Water District Chapter 4 Coachella Valley County Water District’s First Actions Chapter 5 Colorado River Silt, Mexican Water Rights and the Thirst for Colorado River Water Chapter 6 The Boulder Canyon Project and the Taming of the Colorado River Chapter 7 A Political Battle Breaks Out as Coachella Valley Farmers Take Aim at Imperial Irrigation District Chapter 8 Optimism Sweeps the Valley Chapter 9 Endless Delays Chapter 10 Rays of Hope Chapter 11 Boom Times Chapter 12 A Second Lifeline Chapter 13 The Playground of Presidents Chapter 14 Turning Point Chapter 15 The Valley’s Real Estate Market Explodes Chapter 16 Convention Hotels Come to the Coachella Valley Chapter 17 Tourism
    [Show full text]