Institute of Paper Science and Technology Atlanta, Georgia IPST TECHNICAL PAPER SERIES NUMBER 384 IDEAL FIBERS FOR PULP AND PAPER PRODUCTS R.L. ELLIS AND A.W. RUDIE JUNE, 1991 Ideal Fibers for Pulp and Paper Products R.L. Ellis and A.W. Rudie Presented at 21st Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference Knoxville, Tennessee June 17-20, 1991 Copyright 1991 by The Institute of Paper Science and Technology For Members Only NOTICE & DISCLAIMER The Institute of Paper Science and Technology (IPST) has provided a high standard of professional service and has put forth its best efforts within the time and funds available for this project. The information and conclusions are advisory and are intended only for internal use by any company who may receive this report. Each company must decide for itself the best approach to solving any problems it may have and how, or whether, this reported information should be considered in its approach. IPST does not recommend particular products, procedures, materials, or service. These are included only in the interest of completeness within a laboratory context and budgetary constraint. Actual products, procedures, materials, and services used may differ and are peculiar to the operations of each company. In no event shall IPST or its employees and agents have any obligation or liability for damages including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with any company's use of or inability to use the reported information. IPST provides no warranty or guaranty of results. 1 IDEAL FIBERS FOR PULP AND PAPER PRODUCTS R.L. Ellis1/ and A.W. Rudie2 / ABSTRACT The various paper and paperboard products are made for different purposes and therefore have different product specifications and standards. Printing applications require smooth, low porosity paper with sufficient strength to carry the mineral fillers and coatings needed to obtain opacity and gloss. Paperboard products need stiffness and compressive strength to perform well under stacking loads. As the paper requirements change, so do the preferred characteristics of the pulp fibers and the ability of the papermaker to adjust for unfavorable fiber form. Pulping processes also differ in ability to handle diverse tree species. In particular, the mechanical pulping processes are highly species dependent, favoring low-density softwoods with fine fibers and thin cell walls. Performance requirements for typical paperboard and coated paper products are reviewed and the softwood fiber characteristics that maximize performance are identified. In addition, the influence of fiber morphology on the production and performance of mechanical pulps is considered. KEYWORDS Fiber morphology, mechanical pulp, coated paper, paperboard, linerboard, spruce (Picea), western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), southern pine (Pinus). INTRODUCTION Of the many parameters useful as a measure of product performance, board bending stiffness is probably of greatest interest to the construction industry, and paper breaking length or tensile strength is of most interest to the papermaker. In Figure 1, average bending modulus for boards cut from various softwoods (Wood Handbook,1974) is graphed against breaking length (MacLeod, 1980) for kraft pulps derived from the same species. Species that routinely give fibers capable of forming strong papers generally have poor stiffness as solid lumber products. Of the four softwoods Paper BL, (km) 14 SPRUCE 13 W. HEMLOCK 12 11 10 9 DOUGLAS FIR 8,_____8 ,LOBLOLLY 8 9 10 11 12 Board Bending Modulus (GPa) Figure 1. Paper breaking length graphed against board bending modulus for typical pulpwoods. / Professor of Engineering, The Institute of Paper Science and Technology, Atlanta, GA. 2 Assoc. Professor of Chemistry, The Institute of Paper Science and Technology, Atlanta, GA. 2 selected, the spruces, often considered ideal papermaking fibers, have the weakest bending modulus as solid lumber products. In an effort to highlight the needs and desires of the paper industry for wood fiber form, this paper will review the product requirements of various paper and paperboard grades and attempt to identify the key fiber characteristics that contribute to the manufacture of a superior product. To simplify the problem, the hardwood pulp contribution to paper and paperboard performance will not be considered in this paper, and the discussion will be limited to softwoods. The performance of the following representatives of four genera: spruce (white, black and Norway), western hemlock, Douglas-fir, and southern pine (loblolly and shortleaf) will be evaluated in various paper products. Table 1 summarizes average wood density and typical fiber characteristics for representatives of these four softwood genera. Table 1.Fiber characteristics of common U.S. pulpwoods (Isenberg, 1980; Horn, 1972; Koch, 1972). Specific Fiber Latewood Gravity Length Diameter Wall Content Species g/cc mm mn mr % Loblolly Pine 0.47 3.5-4.5 35-45 4-11 20-45 Douglas-fir 0.43 3.5-4.5 35-45 3-8 25 W. Hemlock 0.38 2.5-4.2 30-40 2-5 10-30 W. Spruce 0.37 2.5-4.2 25-35 2-3 3 MECHANICAL PULPING In mechanical pulping, fiber characteristics are a dominant variable and exercise considerable control over the paper quality. Typical quality data for mechanical pulps from the four genera are presented in Table 2. The white wood and thin cell walls of spruce give the strongest and brightest mechanical pulp of the four, making it the preferred genus for high-yield pulping. Douglas-fir, giving low strength and low brightness, is rarely used in mechanical pulping. Table 2 Typical pulp properties and energy consumptions of different species compared with spruce groundwood (Kurdin, 1980; Hatton and Cook, 1990). Genus Spruce W. Hemlock Loblolly Douglas-fir Energy kWh/BDT 1900 1960 2500 2750 Freeness ml 120 80 100 100 Breaking Length km 4.8 3.7 3.3 3.4 Tear Index mNm2/g 9.7 8.3 7.3 6.3 Brightness 5R 56 58 53 Traditionally, wood density has been the parameter most associated with differences in high-yield pulp quality between species. However, wood density does not control mechanical pulp quality but rather, some aspect of fiber structure that correlates well with wood density. 3 The Shallhorn, Karnis equation for the tensile strength of a bond limited paper domain such as newsprint, is given below (Shallhorn and Karnis, 1979). T - NTr Fl 2 where N is the number of fibers in the break, r is the fiber wall radius, r is the bond strength per unit fiber surface, lis the average fiber length. All paper grades are made to a basis weight specification. Adjusting for basis weight by dividing by g/m 2 gives tensile index (or breaking length) and introduces the term N/g. Whereas basis weight is dictated by paper grade, N/ g is controlled by fiber morphology. Average fiber weight can be calculated from fiber volume and density [7r r2-7(r-w)2 ] p where w is average fiber wall thickness and p is cell wall density. Fiber length (I) cancels, cell wall density (Besley, 1969; Smith, 1965; Wangaard, 1969) (p) and bond strength per unit fiber surface area (F) are relatively constant for a given mechanical pulping process and within the softwoods of interest. The term m2 introduced with basis weight is constant within a paper grade or a standardized test procedure. This leaves the term rr, which is 1/2 average fiber circumference, and 7r2-l(r-w)2, which is average fiber wall cross-sectional area (CSA). T =k 7r CSA Using data from various literature sources, this ratio is graphed against TMP breaking length in Figure 2. The straight line obtained indicates that the ratio is a key factor in strength development of mechanical pulps. This result still needs to be evaluated using a coherent set of data. 5 k OD.Fr m .................... .... Loblolly 2 'i- 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45 CIRCUMFERENCE/CSA Figure 2. TMP breaking length at 2000 kWh/BDT specific energy graphed against the ratio of average fiber circumference divided by average fiber wall cross-sectional area. COATED PRINTING PAPERS The key performance requirements of coated printing papers are high smoothness, low porosity and high paper surface strength. 4 Smoothness and Porosity To obtain high gloss and even print density on the coated paper, the final surface must be very smooth (Bristow and Ekman, 1981). The clay coating layer on a sheet of paper is on the order of 5ginm thick (Kartovaara, 1989), comparable to the double-wall thickness of the average spruce fiber and half the double-wall thickness of a loblolly pine fiber. Although the coating process fills in the surface roughness of the sheet with the slurry coating clay, shrinkage on drying reproduces the original surface topography in reduced scale. Additional smoothness is gained by calendering the coated paper. The calendering process improves smoothness and unprinted sheet gloss but can also create other problems. Calendering can cause ink to absorb at different rates (Kartovaara, 1989) and can reduce sheet strength and opacity. To obtain both high smoothness and low porosity in the base paper, papermakers prefer fibers with thin cell walls that collapse on drying to form ribbon-like fibers that conform to the surface of the other fibers in the sheet. This increases paper density, decreases porosity and assures that the maximum surface defect is on the order of 1 double-wall thickness, about 5 gm for spruce. Fibers with thick cell walls resist collapse. A cylindrical fiber is unable to conform to the other fibers in the paper, opening up the paper structure and increasing porosity. If a southern pine latewood fiber on the paper surface fails to collapse on pressing and drying, it can protrude above the average surface of the paper by one whole fiber diameter, 25 to 50 gm (Koch, 1972) and 5 to 10 times the average coating thickness.