DOCSLIB.ORG

Unraveling the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unraveling the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis COMMENTARY Unraveling the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis ODAY WE repeatedly and public health in relation to and/ that contributed to the genesis of the hear about the or concurrent with the TSUS. This in- TSUS will be briefly described. Tuskegee Study of cludesactivitiesbythegovernmentand In the early 1930s, the Rosen- Untreated Syphilis nongovernment entities. If Americans wald Memorial Fund, a Chicago- (TSUS) in the media. do not understand the historical con- based philanthropic foundation, TThe TSUS was the 1932 through text and the successes and failures of undertook what had not been per- 1972 US Public Health Service past public health policy and medical formed before in America—a study (USPHS) study involving approxi- practices,wemayrepeatsimilarerrors. of the prevalence of syphilis among mately 400 African American men A historically correct, empiri- African Americans. The study was with syphilis who were found un- cally based analysis of the TSUS is performed with the cooperation of treated in rural Alabama and were ob- presented in this article. This is im- the USPHS. The purpose of the study served to autopsy. As a control, there portant given the impact that pre- was to determine the practicability was also a comparable group of 200 vious interpretations (ie, racism, and effectiveness of measures for African American men without syphi- genocide, and conspiracy) of the mass control of syphilis. Macon lis who were observed to autopsy.1 TSUS have had on present-day re- County, Alabama, was one of 6 ru- The TSUS is a topic the domain search, medical practice, and race re- ral counties chosen for study; the of which includes not only medicine lations. Four areas that begin to pro- other counties were Albermarle and research but also the social and vide clarity and specificity in County, Virginia; Pitt County, North political sciences. In the popular press understanding the TSUS are the foci Carolina; Bolivar County, Missis- and medical literature, it is linked to of this article: (1) the public health sippi; Tipton County, Tennessee; and discussions about maternal-infant context, (2) the age of the 400 male Glynn County, Georgia. Macon transmission of human immunodefi- syphilitic participants, (3) the pub- County was included because of its ciency virus (HIV) trials in develop- lication of articles about the TSUS proximity to the Tuskegee Institute ing countries,2 the cold-virus trials,3 by the American Medical Associa- and its hospital, the John A. Andrew andallegedCIAdistributionofcocaine tion (AMA), and (4) the public re- Hospital, and the Tuskegee Veter- in Los Angeles, Calif.4,5 The myths in- lations context as interpreted by me- ans Administration Hospital—both clude many scenarios, ie, that the 400 dia and historiographers. These African American–run institutions. men in the study were infected with discussions will emphasize the his- The county and state health depart- syphilis by the government, that no torical perspective with respect to the ments were also cooperative.9 African Americans knew about the standards of medical practice and The Rosenwald Study was the study until the study was exposed in public health at the beginning and first successful attempt to control ve- 1972, and that none of the men re- during the first 20 years of the study. nereal disease in rural areas. The ceived penicillin.5,6 Sir William Osler techniques developed from this his- hascalledsyphilis,initslatestage,“the A PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEM toric project were adopted by the great imitator” because it could simu- USPHS as a model for venereal dis- late or complicate practically every Former Surgeon General Thomas ease control nationwide. Although condition known to internal medi- Parran (1936-1948) provided the the treatment given was not exten- cine.7 And so has the TSUS, at this late following definition of a public sive enough to cure all patients, the stage, become “the great imitator.” It health problem: USPHS physicians were able to ren- has been used to exemplify and vali- der most of the cases noninfec- date government mistrust and con- whenever a disease is so widespread in tious.10,11 Because of the different so- a population, so serious in its effects, so spiracies, primarily those against Af- costly in its treatment, that the individual cioeconomic conditions in the 6 rican Americans. unaided cannot cope with it himself.8 counties, the USPHS also, with re- Absent from current discussions gard to syphilis, learned that fac- are the historical policies, programs, With this definition in mind, tors such as social and economic and procedures surrounding syphilis the immediate prior research events conditions had a more important im- ARCH INTERN MED/ VOL 160, MAR 13, 2000 WWW.ARCHINTERNMED.COM 585 ©2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 pact on disease prevalence than whose objectives were seemingly to evaluate and required consider- race.12 Dr Taliaferro Clark, consult- positive.5,17-20 In the Rosenwald able time (ie, 10-20 years) to deter- ant to the Rosenwald Memorial Study, treatment consisted of 8 or 9 mine the outcome. Specifically, the Fund and one of the USPHS offic- doses of an arsenical, which was less question arose whether clinical and ers who initiated the TSUS, stated than the adequate treatment of 20 serological evaluations were as accu- that “syphilis is not peculiarly a ra- doses and far short of the defini- rate as autopsy examinations in de- cial disease, but is also influenced in tively curative treatment of 70 termining the presence or absence of large measure by environment and doses.21 disease.16 In fact, Dr Felix Under- social standards.”13,14 Dr Charles Johnson, a rural so- wood, a Mississippi public health of- Macon County, the poorest of ciologist from Fisk University, Nash- ficial, after listening to the presenta- the 6 counties, had the highest syphi- ville, Tenn, wrote a classic book tion of an article on the Rosenwald lis prevalence rate—approximately about the people of Macon County Study, contemplated whether syphi- 40%. Clark surmised that the high who the Rosenwald Memorial Fund lis was a major public health prob- prevalence rate was a result of the surveyed. In his book Shadow of the lem in African Americans. He ques- low rate of previous antisyphilitic Plantation, Johnson commented that tioned whether syphilis caused treatment (33 treated out of 1200 se- the physicians noted the large num- damage that resulted in loss of time ropositives [3%]), ie, treatment while ber of positive Wassermann test re- from work and decreased work effi- the patient was infectious.15 Evi- sults (ie, seropositive for syphilis) cacy as well as neurological and car- dence from Albermarle and Pitt among elderly men and women. On diovascular disease. It appeared to counties, which had the lowest examination of these people, the Underwood that since there was such prevalence rates (10% and 13%, re- physicians expected to find more a low percentage of African Ameri- spectively), supported this view. Al- than a positive blood test result (eg, cans receiving treatment, “either though the treatment that was re- evidence of syphilitic destruction). syphilis is not causing the negro of ceived by the residents in Albermarle They further noted that the peak the South much discomfort, or the and Pitt counties seemed inad- positive Wassermann test result rate medical practitioners of the respec- equate, Maxcy and Brumfield,16 was in the group aged 25 to 29 years tive states are not diagnosing 95 per medical faculty members at the Uni- for men and 20 to 24 years for wom- cent of the syphilis” in these states.22 versity of Virginia, believed it may en.9 Subsequent to these peaks, there However, the USPHS officers be- have been sufficient to render early was a decrease in the percentage of lieved that the TSUS “should for- cases noninfectious, thereby halt- positive serological results with ad- ever dispel the rather general belief ing the spread of syphilis. The dif- vancing age that was more abrupt that syphilis is a disease of small con- ferences between residents in Alber- and marked than anticipated. Data sequence to the Negro.”23 marle and Pitt counties and Macon from the other 5 rural counties sup- The results of the Rosenwald County were a function of access to ported this pattern of the “disease” Study and the debate over the re- social, economic, and educational becoming asymptomatic and dem- sults and about whether syphilis opportunities.16 Parran’s definition onstrating serologically negative test caused damage in African Ameri- of a public health problem fit syphi- results later in the life of an un- cans may have contributed to the sci- lis in the population of poor black treated patient—characteristics pre- entific thought that led to the TSUS. sharecroppers in Macon County in viously described in the Oslo Study, The specific precursors seemingly the early 1930s. Clearly, according a retrospective study of untreated were to observe patients with un- to Clark, “the extensive prevalence primary and secondary syphilis. The treated latent syphilis to autopsy and of syphilis” in Macon County con- physicians ruled out a treatment ef- verify the presence or absence of stituted “a public health problem of fect, death, and incapacitation by syphilitic destructive lesions. No prime importance.”13 neurologic or cardiovascular syphi- other prospective study of this type The findings from the Rosen- lis as causes for the decreasing per- had ever been performed. Based on wald Study and the decision to treat centage of positive serological re- the prior experimental data avail- patients to render them noninfec- sults with age.16 able from the Rosenwald Study, the tious were presented and recorded Public health officials were con- risk to the men did not appear to ex- at a constituent meeting of the 1932 cerned about whether clinical and se- ceed the importance of the informa- Annual Convention of the Na- rological evaluations could serve as tion that could be derived.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Informed Consent and Shared Decision Making in EBM
    3 Informed Consent and shared decision making in EBM 3.1 ‘Informed consent’ in regular medical practice ‘Consent’ as it is understood in the medical context has to be asked from the pa- tient and is the explicit agreement to waive a right to certain rules and norms which are normally expected in the treatment of other people and of ourselves as patients. Every surgical procedure would, without consent from the patient, be legally un- derstood as assault and battery and the physician could be prosecuted for perform- ing it. ‘Informed consent’ therefore in its most simple form means that the patient has received a good explanation about a medical procedure, understands what is happening to him or her and then can make an informed choice to accept or refuse, in the latter case the so called ‘informed refusal.167 In order to give ‘informed con- sent the patient has to be capable of understanding the information given by the physician. He or she must be competent to decide and to give consent voluntarily without being coerced by any means into giving consent.168 ‘Autonomy’ of the patient, hereby equated with ‘person’ plays the overarching role in ‘informed con- sent.’ A competent person who exercises autonomy will have the final say about their own life. ‘Autonomy’ itself is a contested term in the philosophy of science and interpretations therefore vary. According to Dworkin, “Liberty (positive or negative) ... dignity, integrity, individuality, independence, responsibility and self knowledge ... self assertion ... critical reflection ... freedom from obligation ... ab- sence of external causation ... and knowledge of one’s own interests.”169 all fall under the definition of autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation Abstracts
    Eighth Annual Western Michigan University Medical Humanities Conference Conference Abstracts Hosted by the WMU Medical Humanities Workgroup and the Program in Medical Ethics, Humanities, and Law, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine September 13-14, 2018 Our Sponsors: Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, WMU Center for the Study of Ethics in Society, WMU Department of Philosophy Ethics After Error: Malpractice, Mistrust, and the Limits of Medical Moral Repair Ben Almassi, PhD Division of Arts & Letters Governors State University Abstract: One limitation of medical ethics modelled on ideal moral theory is its relative silence on the aftermath of medical error – that is, not just on the recognition and avoidance of injustice, wrongdoing, or other such failures of medical ethics, but how to respond given medical injustice or wrongdoing. Ideally, we would never do each other wrong; but given that inevitably we do, as fallible and imperfect agents we require non-ideal ethical guidance. For such non-ideal moral contexts, I suggest, Margaret Walker’s account of moral repair and reparative justice presents powerful hermeneutical and practical tools toward understanding and enacting what is needed to restore moral relationships and moral standing in the aftermath of injustice or wrongdoing, tools that might be usefully extended to medical ethics and error specifically. Where retributive justice aims to make injured parties whole and retributive justice aims to mete out punishment, reparative justice “involves the restoration or reconstruction of confidence, trust, and hope in the reality of shared moral standards and of our reliability in meeting and enforcing them.” Medical moral repair is not without its challenges, however, in both theory and practice: standard ways of holding medical professionals and institutions responsible for medical error and malpractice function retributively and/or restitutively, either giving benign inattention to patient-practitioner relational repair or impeding it.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenfactsaboutld 2012
    Lyme Disease Lyme Disease Association, Inc. Top 10 Facts Lyme disease is caused by a spiral-shaped bacteria, Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb), or by newly discovered Borrelia mayonii. It is usually transmitted by the bite of an infected tick−Ixodes scapularis in the East, Ixodes pacificus in the West. The longer a tick is attached, the greater risk of disease transmission. Improper removal increases risk of infection. Go to www.LymeDiseaseAssociation.org for details. 1. Lyme is the most prevalent vector-borne disease in the USA. The ticks that cause Lyme are now found in 50% of US counties. It’s found in more than 80 countries worldwide. 2. According to the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC), only 10% of Lyme disease cases are reported each year. So in 2015, about 400,000 new cases of Lyme occurred in the USA. In 2009, CDC said the incidence of Lyme surpassed that of HIV. 3. One bite from Ixodes scapularis (western blacklegged/deer tick) can transmit one or more: Lyme, babesiosis, anaplasmosis, tularemia, ehrlichiosis, bartonellosis, Borrelia miyamotoi, tick paralysis, Powassan virus, clouding diagnostic/treatment picture. 4. Lyme disease is often called the "Great Imitator." It may be misdiagnosed as; multiple sclerosis (MS), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), lupus, chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, autism, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease and other conditions. 5. A bite from a tick that’s infected with Lyme disease bacteria can lead to neurologic, cardiac, arthritic and psychiatric manifestations in humans. It may cause death, sometimes cardiac related. 6. Children account for 30% of Lyme cases: ages 5-14 are at the highest risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuskegee and the Health of Black Men
    Tuskegee and the Health of Black Men Marcella Alsan and Marianne Wanamaker April 2016 PRELIMINARY. COMMENTS WELCOME. Abstract JEL Codes: I25, O15 For forty years, the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male passively monitored hundreds of adult black males with syphilis despite the availability of effective treatment. The study’s methods have become synonymous with exploitation and mistreatment by the medical community. We find that the historical disclosure of the study in 1972 is correlated with in- creases in medical mistrust and mortality and decreases in outpatient physician interactions for black men. Blacks possessing prior experience with the medical community, including veterans and women, appear to have been less affected by the disclosure. Our findings relate to a broader literature on how be- liefs are formed and the importance of trust for economic exchanges involving asymmetric information. We are grateful to William Collins, Joe Ferrie, Nathan Nunn, John Parman, Achyuta Adhvaryu, Arun Chandrasekhar, Martha Bailey, Rebecca Diamond, Claudia Goldin, Melanie Morten, Mark Duggan, Mark Cullen, Melissa Dell, Nancy Qian, Ran Abramitzky, Pascaline Dupas, Rema Hanna, Grant Miller and participants at NBER DAE, University of Tennessee, Vander- bilt Health Policy, Carnegie Mellon Applied Microeconomics, University of Copenhagen Economics, University of Pennsylvania Health Policy, ASSA 2016 Berkeley Population Center, University of Chicago Harris and Stanford Health Policy for constructive comments. We thank the CDC for providing access and to the administrators at the Atlanta and Stanford Census Research Data Centers for their help in navigating the restricted data. We thank Michael Sinkinson, Martha Bailey, Andrew Goodman-Bacon and Walker Hanlon for sharing data and methods.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Case: 13-36217, 03/14/2016, ID: 9899915, DktEntry: 34-1, Page 1 of 33 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GEORGE O. MITCHELL, No. 13-36217 Plaintiff-Appellant, DC No. v. 3:12 cv-05403 BHS STATE OF WASHINGTON; KELLY CUNNINGHAM, SCC Superintendent; DR. THOMAS BELL, OPINION Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted April 6, 2015—Pasadena, California Filed March 14, 2016 Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, A. Wallace Tashima, and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Tashima; Concurrence by Judge Clifton Case: 13-36217, 03/14/2016, ID: 9899915, DktEntry: 34-1, Page 2 of 33 2 MITCHELL V. STATE OF WASHINGTON SUMMARY* Prisoner Civil Rights The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which plaintiff, who is civilly committed as a sexually violent predator, alleged that defendants’ refusal to treat his Hepatitis C with interferon and ribavirin violated his right to reasonable medical care and that the consideration of race in the denial of this treatment violated the Equal Protection Clause. The panel first held the district court erred by finding that the damages claims against the state defendants were barred by the Eleventh Amendment. The panel held that even though plaintiff testified in his deposition that he was suing defendants only in their official capacities, his amended complaint clearly stated that he was suing defendants in both their official and personal capacities for damages and injunctive relief and the record demonstrated that plaintiff, acting pro se, did not understand the legal significance of bringing claims against defendants in their official versus personal capacities.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuskegee Mixer Materials
    Tuskegee Syphilis Study Mixer By Gretchen Kraig-Turner (with additions and revisions by Linda Christensen) Questions: 1. Find someone who supported the study. Who is it? Why did this person support the study? 2. Find someone who was hurt by the Tuskegee Study. Who is it? How was this person hurt? 3. Find someone who took action about the Tuskegee Study. Who is it? What did the person do? 4. Find someone who benefited from the Tuskegee Study. Who is it? How did this person benefit? 5. Find a doctor who was connected to the Tuskegee Study. Who is it? What was his connection to the study? 6. Find someone who was troubled by the Tuskegee Study. Who is it? What troubled this person? 7. Find someone who had to make a choice about their role in the study. Who was it? What choice did the person have to make? Jean Heller: After receiving a tip from whistleblower Peter Buxtun, who worked as an interviewer for the Public Health Service, Associated Press asked me to investigate Buxtun’s claims about an unethical medical study focused on African American men with syphilis. Although I wrote the story that eventually stopped the study, Peter Buxtun was the one who uncovered the story and investigated what he believed was an immoral study. On July 25, 1972, the Washington Evening Star newspaper ran my article on its front page: "Syphilis Patients Died Untreated." I wrote: For 40 years, the U.S. Public Health Service has conducted a study in which human guinea pigs, not given proper treatment, have died of syphilis and its side effects.
    [Show full text]
  • LYME DISEASE “The Great Imitator”
    Rocky Mountain Tribal Leaders Council September 26, 2020 LYME DISEASE “The Great Imitator” Lyme disease - Basics • The most common vector- borne illness in the U.S. • Also known as Lyme borreliosis. • Transmitted to humans via ticks which are infected with a spirochete (spiral shape bacterium) called Borrelia burgdorferi. • Borrellia’s cork-screw shape allows it to burrow Classic Erythema Chronicum Migrans “bull’s eye” rash. into a variety of tissues, causing multi-system illness. Co-infection with Signs and symptoms of Lyme disease Babesia or Ehrlichia is common. • Symptoms of Lyme disease begin 3-30 days after a tick bite; average 7 days. Symptoms vary by disease stage. • Called The Great Imitator since its symptoms mimic • Stage 1: Occurs 1-30 days after the tick bite. Flu-like illness many other diseases. For (fever, chills, fatigue, malaise, muscle or joint pain), headache, red this reason, patients are expanding rash (bull’s eye rash, depicted above). The rash occurs often misdiagnosed with at or near the site of the tick bite and may persist for 2-3 weeks. chronic fatigue syndrome, • Stage 2: Early disseminated disease, 3-10 weeks after fibromyalgia, multiple inoculation. Musculoskeletal and neurologic symptoms, such as sclerosis, and various arthritis, facial muscle weakness or paralysis, meningitis, waxing psychiatric illnesses, and waning headache, neck pain/stiffness, fever, malaise, double including depression. or blurred vision, dizziness, heart palpitations, or chest pain. • Misdiagnosis leads to • Stage 3: Occurs months to years after the initial infection. unrestrained progression Arthritis of large joints, especially the knee, associated with of Lyme infection and warmth, swelling, and limited range of motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Read the Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks Our Common Read
    Common Read The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks Our common read book has inter-disciplinary value/relevance, covering social and biological sciences as well as humanities and education including scientific/medical ethics, nursing, biology, genetics, psychology, sociology, communication, business, criminal justice, history, deaf studies and social justice. Below are chapter summaries that focus on the above disciplines to give respective faculty ideas about how the book can be used for their courses. Part One: Life 1. The Exam….1951: A medical visit at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, the “northern most Southern city.” Although Johns Hopkins is established as an indigent hospital, Jim Crow era policies/ideologies are pervasive in the care/treatment of black patients. 2. Clover…1920-1942: Birthplace of Henrietta and several of the Lacks family members, including Day, Henrietta’s cousin, husband, and father of her children. A “day in the life” snapshot of life and work in this rural agricultural small town with distinct social/economic divisions across race and socioeconomic status. 3. Diagnosis and Treatment…1951: Henrietta’s diagnosis of cervical carcinomas with a history/statistical profile of diagnostic techniques and prevailing treatment regime of the time. Henrietta’s statement of consent to operative procedures is given along with removal of cancerous tissue and subsequent radium insertion into her cervix. 4. The Birth of HeLa…1951: In depth discussion of the Johns Hopkins lab including the development of an appropriate medium to grow cells. HeLa cells, the first immortal line, are born in this meticulously sterilized lab by the Geys. 5. “Blackness Be Spreadin All Inside”…1951: A look back at the lively, fun loving youthful Henrietta compared to some of the heartache of the birth of Henrietta’s second daughter, Elsie, who was born “special” (epileptic, deaf, and unable to speak).
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Ethics Christopher Newport University, Spring 2020
    Medical Ethics Christopher Newport University, Spring 2020 Meeting Info Dr. Chris Tweedt Philosophy 384, Sec. 1 202 McMurran Hall TR 7:30{8:45 pm [email protected] 357 McMurran Hall Office Hours Tuesday & Thursday 2{4 pm Textbook Bioethics: Principles, Issues, and Cases, 3rd ed. by Lewis Vaughn. Outcomes The purpose of this class is to help you 1. clearly and informedly think through ethical decisions, 2. gain an understanding of the arguments and viewpoints relevant to central medical ethics debates 3. learn to discuss polarizing issues in a charitable and respectful manner, especially in the presence of strong disagreement, and 4. develop the ability to charitably and accurately interpret, summarize, and critique philosophical arguments in the context of medical ethics. Overview Medical decisions have consequences|health-related consequences, financial conse- quences, legal consequences, and, most relevant to this course, ethical consequences. When you enter the medical field, you will be faced with difficult ethical decisions. In this course, you will learn how to make these decisions and make them well. The topics of this course are focused on issues that arise in health care professionals real- world practice. This course will present a variety of views on each topic in order to help students understand and articulate their reasons for their positions. The course is divided into three sections. 1. First, we will develop a framework for making ethical decisions. We will address these questions: Why do we treat people, and when do we know when to stop? Which principles should guide our interaction with patients and provision of treat- ment? How should we make decisions when our moral principles conflict? How do we make decisions that we know have a bad effect? How should we deal with mistakes weve made? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Abdominal Tuberculosis Misdiagnosed As Acute Surgical Abdomen and Carcinomatosis [Version 2; Peer Review: 2 Approved]
    F1000Research 2021, 10:355 Last updated: 13 JUL 2021 CLINICAL PRACTICE ARTICLE Abdominal tuberculosis misdiagnosed as acute surgical abdomen and carcinomatosis [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] Edinson Dante Meregildo-Rodriguez 1,2, Rosita Claudia Tafur-Ramirez3, Walter Giovanny Espino-Saavedra4, Sonia Fiorella Angulo-Prentice4 1Universidad César Vallejo, Escuela de Medicina, Trujillo, La Libertad, Peru 2Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Regional Lambayeque, Chiclayo, Lambayeque, 14007, Peru 3Department of Nephrology, Hospital Regional Lambayeque, Chiclayo, Lambayeque, 14007, Peru 4Department of Clinical Pathology, Hospital Regional Lambayeque, Chiclayo, Lambayeque, 14007, Peru v2 First published: 07 May 2021, 10:355 Open Peer Review https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53036.1 Latest published: 12 Jul 2021, 10:355 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53036.2 Reviewer Status Invited Reviewers Abstract Tuberculosis is a major public health problem worldwide. Tuberculosis 1 2 can be confused with other diseases and its diagnosis is frequently delayed, especially in areas of low prevalence. Abdominal tuberculosis version 2 includes involvement of the gastrointestinal tract, peritoneum, lymph (revision) nodes, and/or solid organs; and accounts for 5% of all cases of 12 Jul 2021 tuberculosis. We report two cases of young patients who presented preoperatively as acute abdomen due to acute appendicitis. During version 1 surgery, these cases were misdiagnosed as “carcinomatosis”, and in 07 May 2021 report report the postoperative period these cases were complicated with septic shock. In both cases, histopathology showed caseating 1. Uzair Yaqoob , Dow University of Health granulomas which suggested tuberculous peritonitis and enteritis. Subsequently, RT-PCR in peritoneal fluid confirmed Mycobacterium Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan tuberculosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Syphilis: the Great Imitator Can't Be Forgotten
    SECONDARYIMAGE SYPHILIS: TINHE GREA MEDICINET IMITATOR CAN’T BE FORGOttEN Secondary syphilis: The great imitator can’t be forgotten CLARISSA PRIETO HERMAN REINEHR1*, CÉLIA LUIZA PETERSEN VITELLO KALIL2, VINÍCIUS PRIETO HERMAN REINEHR3 1MD, Dermatologist, Member of the Brazilian Society of Dermatology, Master’s Student at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil 2Dermatologist, Member of the Brazilian Society of Dermatology, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil 3MD, General Practitioner, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil SUMMARY Study conducted at Clínica Dermatológica Célia Kalil, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Syphilis is an infection caused by Treponema pallidum, mainly transmitted by sexual contact. Since 2001, primary and secondary syphilis rates started to rise, Article received: 11/7/2016 Accepted for publication: 12/4/2016 with an epidemic resurgence. The authors describe an exuberant case of second- ary syphilis, presenting with annular and lichen planus-like lesions, as well as *Correspondence: Address: Rua Félix da Cunha, 1.009, one mucocutaneous lesion. Physicians must be aware of syphilis in daily practice, conj. 401 since the vast spectrum of its cutaneous manifestations is rising worldwide. Porto Alegre, RS – Brazil Postal code: 90570-001 [email protected] Keywords: cutaneous syphilis, sexually transmitted disease, benzathine penicil- lin G, Treponema pallidum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.63.06.481 INTRODUCTION firmed and the patient was treated with three weekly in- Syphilis is an infection caused by Treponema pallidum, a spi- tramuscular injections of benzathine penicillin G 2.4×106 rochete bacterium transmitted mostly by sexual contact. IU.4 The patient was advised to contact his sexual partners Spirochetes penetrate skin or mucosa in areas of micro- so that they could seek medical evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • CLINICAL UPDATE UPDATE Coeliac Disease: the Great Imitator
    CLINICAL UPDATE UPDATE Coeliac disease: the great imitator John M Duggan “Know syphilis in all its manifestations and all other things ABSTRACT clinical will be added unto you.”1 ■ Coeliac disease (CD) is caused by a complex immunological WHEN THE SUPREME CLINICIAN William Osler wrote this, response provoked by grain protein in susceptible people. he was drawing attention to the ubiquity of syphilis and the remarkable range of its late-stage manifestations, today ■ The majority of people with CD are symptom-free adults; virtuallyThe unknown.Medical Journal However, of Australia I argue ISSN: that 0025-729X its place has been the remainder are prone to a bewildering variety of signs taken17 by May coeliac 2004 180disease 10 524-526 (CD), another great imitator. As a and symptoms, ranging from infertility to type 1 diabetes. diagnostic©The challenge,Medical JournalCD is ofthe Australia“syphilis” 2004 of the 21st ■ Many patients with undiagnosed CD spend years seeking century.www.mja.com.au Clinical Update help for complaints such as chronic tiredness or mild Western civilisation owes much of its foundation to a abdominal symptoms. strange molecular rearrangement of the chromosomes of wild grasses in the Middle East to produce a high-protein, ■ In primary care, an appropriate target group to test for CD is high-yielding grain — wheat — with six sets of chromo- people with anaemia (especially women), chronic tiredness, somes. This enabled the nomads to settle down with some non-specific abdominal symptoms (including so-called assurance of a regular food supply and time to think and “irritable bowel syndrome”), or a family history of CD.
    [Show full text]