DOCSLIB.ORG

The Evolution of Cyber Warfare and Its Role in Shaping International

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Evolution of Cyber Warfare and Its Role in Shaping International The New Battlefront: The evolution of cyber warfare and its role in shaping international diplomacy and conflict Author: Hamid Mansoor Mentor: Ming Chow Abstract: This paper will examine the evolving nature of Cyber Warfare and its role in shaping international diplomacy and conflict in the 21st century. Cyber Warfare is defined as cyber attacks perpetrated by one state against another to disrupt and damage infrastructure and to steal important national secrets. From the 2014 hack into the systems of Sony Pictures Entertainment (allegedly by North Korean hackers) to the recent hack into the US Office of Personnel Management (allegedly by the Chinese), mass cyber attacks have increased in their sheer volume, complexity and audacity. One of the main issues discussed during the recent visit by the Chinese premier to the US was the cyber battle between the two countries. This paper will explore the various motives for nation­states to conduct these attacks, the various methods and tools employed, the rapidly developing field of cyber defense and the important implications these issues have on international diplomacy and the defense industry. Introduction: Technology is not only changing the way we live, learn, entertain and receive health care, but also the way we fight. With increasing dependance on technology worldwide, it comes as no surprise that nation states are rapidly adding cyber defense and offence capabilities to their military and intelligence programs. With a lack of global frameworks for dealing with cyber crimes, any major cyber attack can be construed as a justifiable cause for the declaration of war between countries. The recent high profile attacks have put a spotlight on the diplomatic implications of such actions. The scale of this warfare was described aptly by the House Intelligence Chairman Rep. Mike Rogers when he said: “US is involved in a cyber war everyday” [3]. To the Community: I chose this topic because of the increasing relevance of cyberwarfare in the lives of regular citizens. It is important for all of us to be aware of this complex issue as it will feature more and more in policy and law making. In March 2013, top US intelligence officials conceded that cyber warfare poses a greater threat to USA than that posed by conventional terrorist groups such as Al­Qaeda [2]. There is concern that cyber warfare can be used to disrupt the lives of everyday citizens by targeting infrastructure such as causing a malfunction in a power grid etc. It is very important for us all to be aware of these issues so that we can have a say in any national level policy that gets devised to tackle these issues. Motives of various nation states to conduct cyber attacks: There are several motives for states to wage cyber wars. Cyber weapons allow countries to conduct wars without declaring wars. The promise of anonymity and deniability makes cyber warfare very useful for militaristic purposes. An important example of this is when Russia recently used a cyber weapon called “Ouroboros” or Snake against the government communication systems in Ukraine [11]. The weapon had the ability to conduct surveillance and also physically destroy computer networks. Russia has repeatedly denied direct involvement in the Ukraine crisis and using such tactics allows it to pursue its agenda while maintaining deniability. Another militaristic use is intelligence gathering. The hack of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) affected more than 21.5 million people in USA. The OPM conducts backgrounds checks on people applying for federal jobs. The breach exposed very sensitive information about federal employees and contractors, including several that were stationed in China. The US authorities had to evacuate some employees from China due to the leakage of compromising information [7]. Cyber warfare is also used in intimidation tactics. The attack on Sony Entertainment, which has been blamed on North Korea, prior to the release of the movie “The Interview” is an example of that. The attack prompted widespread fear of further attacks, which led to some major distributors refusing to show the movie [17]. Another motive to conduct cyber warfare is to steal trade secrets. Countries like Russia and China stand to benefit greatly from stealing trade secrets as some of the largest and most powerful industries in these countries are state owned. For example, Edward Snowden’s leaks show that China allegedly stole the designs for the F­35 jet which is the most expensive weapons project in the history of the world. Military analysts have noted some striking similarities in the Chinese J­31 fighter and the F­35 [9]. Impact on the diplomatic relations between the world’s superpowers: Cyber warfare has very important implications for international diplomacy. The three global powers, USA, Russia and China routinely accuse each other of cyber malpractice [1]. Just last year, USA Department of Justice charged five Chinese military officials with cyber espionage against US corporations [8]. This caused a considerable diplomatic row and shone a light at the deep mistrust between the two countries. The prospect of a framework or a treaty to mitigate such activities remains elusive. Cyber warfare was one of the key issues of concern during the much hyped visit to the US by the Chinese premier Xi Jingping this year [10]. Both the countries failed to construct any meaningful framework to lower the intensity of cyber sabotage against each other. Russia has traditionally favored a comprehensive treaty to deal with cyber issues. USA however, favors more defense and increased cooperation between the international law enforcement agencies [4]. The two countries however do have a cyberwar­hotline to avert “a crisis situation arising from an ICT security incident.”. The hotline was established in 2013 and provides a secure line of communication between the US Cybersecurity Coordinator and the Russian Deputy Secretary of the Security Council [6]. Impact of the evolution of cyber warfare on defense spending and research: Countries around the world are devoting increasing resources to study and develop the capabilities for cyber warfare. In 2013, cyber security firm Mandiant wrote a famous report in which they identified the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Unit 61398 as one of the most sophisticated and notorious engines of cyber warfare. The report estimates that there are hundreds or thousands of people in the unit. The unit is thought to be well equipped and its personnel are trained extensively in computer networks and are required to be proficient in English [14]. The Obama administration has proposed a budget of $14 billion for cybersecurity initiatives for the year 2016. This marks an increase of $1 billion over the last year [12]. In addition, the US military is on a hiring spree for more and more cyber warriors. US Cyber Command is supposed to be fully operational with 6000 active­duty cyber warriors by 2017 [13]. Cyber warfare has also changed the perception of an act of war. In 2011, the Pentagon declared that the US reserved the right to retaliate with military force in case of a cyber attack [15]. The lack of a universal treaty or agreement regulating the cyber space makes this situation all the more dangerous. This absence has sparked an arms race between all the major global players to develop the most advanced cyber attack and defense capabilities. The development of a comprehensive framework would have the benefit of allowing states to worry less about potential attacks from one another and to focus more energy and resources on curbing cyber crimes and apprehending cyber criminals [5]. Methods and tactics employed by cyber attackers: States use a variety of sophisticated cyber weapons to perpetrate these attacks. The secrecy of cyber weapons programs makes it very hard to determine the capabilities of various states. Cyber security experts and industry leaders are always on the lookout for more clues into the inner workings of defense agencies. One particularly interesting cyber weapon that is used by the Chinese is called the “Great Cannon”. This name has been coined by The Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto after they observed a DDoS attack on the website GreatFire.org, a not­for­profit website that highlights the high level of internet censorship prevalent in China, and its associated Github pages. The Great Cannon (GC) is colocated with China’s “Great Firewall”. The Great Firewall is the main Chinese instrument to conduct internet censorship. The GC is however a separate cyber weapon. From the analysis by the Citizen Lab, GC is essentially a tool to hijack traffic from specific IP addresses and place unencrypted content in that traffic as a Man­In­The­Middle (MITM). GC then manipulates this traffic to create a massive DDoS attack. The report contains a very useful image to illustrate the concept of GC and the Great Firewall [16]: “Simplified logical topology of the Great Cannon and Great Firewall” [16] Another famous malware is Wiper. It has several variants such as Shamoon, Destover (used in the Sony hack) and Dark Seoul. As its name implies, the primary feature of this malware is to infiltrate and destroy data. Action Items: The main action item that I would recommend is just to make yourself aware of the complex issues surrounding this topic. Cyber warfare is becoming more and more advanced and the general population is quite unaware of it. Acquainting yourself with these issues would allow you to make better decisions when it comes to voting and having your opinion heard in any policy making. Another action item could be to reach out to your lawmakers and make them aware of your concerns regarding cyber warfare and the absence of any international regime governing the use of cyberspace.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • China, Encryption Policy, and International Influence 3
    A HOOVER INSTITUTION ESSAY China, Encryption Policy, and International Influence ADAM SEGAL Series Paper No. 1610 Hanging over the stand-off between the FBI and Apple over access to an encrypted iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino attackers was the question: What would China do?1 If Apple created unique software that allowed Washington access to the phone, would that open the door for Beijing to make similar demands on the company and all other foreign technology firms operating in China? As Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon argued, “This move by the FBI could snowball around the world. Why in the world would our government want to give repressive regimes in Russia and China a blueprint for forcing American companies to create a backdoor?”2 There was, at least at the rhetorical level, interaction between Chinese and US policymakers on the question of encryption. An early draft of China’s counterterrorism Law and Technology, Security, National law, for example, included provisions requiring the installation of backdoors and the reporting of encryption keys. President Barack Obama criticized these provisions in a March 2015 interview with Reuters, claiming they “would essentially force all foreign companies, including US companies, to turn over to the Chinese government mechanisms where they could snoop and keep track of all the users of those services.” He added, “We’ve made very clear to them [the Chinese government] that this is something they’re going to have to change if they expect to do business with the United States.”3 A few days
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 6: Governance and Order in a Networked World
    6 GOVERNANCE AND ORDER IN A NETWORKED WORLD Niall Ferguson “ s the world slouching toward a grave systemic crisis?” asked the his- Itorian Philip Zelikow at the annual gathering of the Aspen Strategy Group earlier this summer, the kind of “deep system- wide crisis . when people all over the world no longer think the old order work[s].” Among the reasons he gave for anticipating such a crisis was “the digital revolution and the rise of a networked world.” To grasp the scale and nature of this coming crisis, we must begin by recognizing how drasti- cally the balance of power has shift ed in our time from hierarchically ordered empires and superpowers (the euphemism for empire developed to suit American and Soviet sensibilities) to distributed networks. To be sure, the formal “org. chart” of global power is still dominated by the vertically structured super- polities that gradually evolved out of the republics and monarchies of early modern Europe, the colonies they established in the New World, and the older empires of Asia. Th ough not the most populous nation in the world, the United States is certainly the world’s most powerful state, despite—or perhaps because of—the peculiarities of its political system. Its nearest rival, the People’s Republic of China, is usually seen as a profoundly diff erent kind of state, for while the United States has two major parties, the People’s Republic has one, and only one. Th e US government is founded on the separation 159 119106-Shultz_BeyondDisruption.indd9106-Shultz_BeyondDisruption.indd 159159 33/23/18/23/18 77:12:12 PMPM 160 Niall Ferguson of powers, not least the independence of its judiciary; the PRC subordi- nates all other institutions, including the courts, to the dictates of the Communist Party.
    [Show full text]
  • How China's Government, Businesses, and Populace
    Behind the Great Firewall: How China’s Government, Businesses, and Populace Compete to Shape the Chinese Internet An STS Research Paper presented to the faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science University of Virginia by James Houghton May 5, 2020 On my honor as a University student, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this assignment as defined by the Honor Guidelines for Thesis-Related Assignments. Signed: _________________________________________________ Approved: ____________________________________________ Date _______________________ Peter Norton, Department of Engineering and Society 1 Behind the Great Firewall: How China’s Government, Businesses, and Populace Compete to Shape the Chinese Internet Introduction Chinese citizens are subject to some of the strictest censorship in the world. The Chinese government blocks nearly all of Google’s services, Facebook, Twitter, and even some academic journals. Even today, political expression is limited, and whistleblowers are silenced (Griffiths, 2020). Although many in China remain complacent due to highly integrated applications like WeChat, a small minority is vocal about combating censorship. The relationship between Chinese authorities and web users is complex and requires investigation. The Communist Party of China (CPC) has built what is now called the Great Firewall of China (GFW), a web traffic monitoring and censorship system. The CPC routinely uses it to scan for and block content it deems sensitive or inappropriate (Zheng, 2017). Although some people working in academia and business may have methods, by exemption or otherwise, of bypassing some of the GFW restrictions, the CPC has plugged many of its holes in recent years, impeding research and business opportunities. However, nearly all Chinese web users including students do not seek to access the uncensored web, and many businesses thrive with the lack of much foreign intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotspot Analysis: Synthesis 2017: Cyber-Conflicts in Perspective CSS CYBER DEFENSE PROJECT
    CSS CYBER DEFENSE PROJECT Hotspot Analysis: Synthesis 2017: Cyber-conflicts in perspective Zürich, September 2018 Version 1 Risk and Resilience Team Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich Synthesis 2017: Cyber-conflicts in perspective Author: Marie Baezner © 2018 Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich Contact: Center for Security Studies Haldeneggsteig 4 ETH Zürich CH-8092 Zürich Switzerland Tel.: +41-44-632 40 25 [email protected] www.css.ethz.ch Analysis prepared by: Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich ETH-CSS project management: Tim Prior, Head of the Risk and Resilience Research Group; Myriam Dunn Cavelty, Deputy Head for Research and Teaching; Andreas Wenger, Director of the CSS Disclaimer: The opinions presented in this study exclusively reflect the authors’ views. Please cite as: Baezner, Marie (2018): Hotspot Analysis: Synthesis 2017: Cyber-conflicts in perspective, September 2018, Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich. 1 Synthesis 2017: Cyber-conflicts in perspective Table of Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Beyond cybercrime: The politicization of cyberspace 5 2.1 Integration of cybersecurity at the policy level 5 2.2 Political and national security dimension 5 Strategic choice of target 5 Strategic attribution on the rise 6 2.3 Little innovation in cyberweapons 7 2.4 Restraint 7 3 Context matters: Cybermeans are adjunct, not stand-alone 8 3.1 Internationalized civil war: Syria 8 3.2 Asymmetric military operation between states: Ukraine 8 3.3 Strategic relationship between powers: USA- Russia, Elections in Europe, and China-USA 8 4 Determining the legitimate use of cybermeans: shaping behavioral norms 9 4.1 Disagreements on the purpose of intelligence 9 4.2 Disagreements on information warfare 9 5 Conclusion 10 6 Annex 1 11 7 Annex 2 18 8 Glossary 23 9 Abbreviations 23 10 Bibliography 24 2 Synthesis 2017: Cyber-conflicts in perspective regarding legitimate and illegitimate uses of cyberspace Executive Summary in strategic interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of the Press
    China Page 1 of 7 Published on Freedom House (https://freedomhouse.org) Home > China China Country: China Year: 2016 Press Freedom Status: Not Free PFS Score: 87 Legal Environment: 30 Political Environment: 35 Economic Environment: 22 Overview China is home to one of the world’s most restrictive media environments. The already limited space for investigative journalism and online commentary shrank during 2015, continuing a trend of ideological tightening since Xi Jinping assumed the leadership of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012. Censorship of news and internet content related to the financial system and environmental pollution increased as the economy slowed and smog intensified, adding to the topics’ political sensitivity. Key Developments • Professional journalists from established news outlets were detained, imprisoned, and forced to air televised confessions. After a number of new arrests during the year, there were 49 journalists and online writers behind bars in China as of December. • Liberal, commercialized news publications encountered growing financial and political pressures, while the influence of party mouthpieces and state-subsidized outlets grew. Authorities imposed restrictions on two well-known finance publications that had also reported on corruption. https://freedomhouse.org/print/48309 4/29/2016 China Page 2 of 7 • Dedicated internet users continued to employ circumvention technology and other creative tactics to defy and bypass restrictions on free expression. The government responded by increasing efforts to block circumvention tools, including through innovative cyberattacks and intimidation of software developers. Legal Environment: 30 / 30 Article 35 of the constitution guarantees freedoms of speech, assembly, association, and publication, but such rights are subordinated to the discretion of the CCP and its status as the ruling power.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Government Influence on the U.S. Media Landscape
    Chinese Government Influence on the U.S. Media Landscape Written Testimony by Sarah Cook Senior Research Analyst for East Asia, Freedom House Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Hearing on China’s Information Controls, Global Media Influence, and Cyber Warfare Strategy May 4, 2017 Introduction Reuters establishes a new round of internal vetting on stories about human rights in China after its English and Chinese websites are blocked.1 Radio stations in fifteen U.S. cities broadcast content provided by Chinese state-run media.2 Tech giant Apple removes the New York Times’ mobile-phone applications from its download store in China with little explanation.3 And several rounds of crippling cyberattacks hit the New York-based servers of New Tang Dynasty Television and The Epoch Times newspaper’s websites.4 These are a small sample of incidents that have occurred over the past three years. Collectively, they illustrate various ways in which Chinese Communist Party (CCP) information controls—in terms of both censorship and propaganda—extend beyond mainland China’s borders and influence the media landscape in the United States. This testimony summarizes and supplements a 2013 study I authored of this phenomenon globally—The Long Shadow of Chinese Censorship,5 while attempting to offer updates on its recent evolution as it pertains to the American news media sector. The CCP and various Chinese government entities, have long sought to influence public debate and media coverage about China in the United States, particularly among Chinese language communities. However, over the past decade, these efforts have expanded and intensified.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in China and US Policy
    Human Rights in China and U.S. Policy: Issues for the 115th Congress (name redacted) Specialist in Asian Affairs Updated July 17, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R44897 Human Rights in China and U.S. Policy: Issues for the 115th Congress Summary This report examines human rights conditions in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and policy options for Congress. The PRC government under the leadership of Chinese Communist Party General Secretary and State President Xi Jinping has implemented a clampdown on political dissent, civil society, human rights activists and lawyers, and the religious, cultural, and linguistic practices of Tibetans and Uyghurs. Other major human rights violations in China include the practice of incommunicado detention, torture of persons in custody, censorship of the Internet, and restrictions on the freedoms of religion, association, and assembly. The era of Hu Jintao, Xi’s predecessor, who was China’s leader from 2002 to 2012, was marked by serious human rights abuses, but also by an emerging civil society of nongovernmental organizations and advocacy groups, a growing number of human rights activists and lawyers, and the rise of limited investigative reporting and public discourse on social media platforms. Despite moving forward with some policies aimed at reducing rights abuses and making the government more transparent and responsive, Xi has implemented new laws that appear to strengthen the role of the Communist Party and the state over a wide range of social and civil society activities in the name of national security, and instated greater government controls over the media and the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Report to Congress of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission
    2015 Report to Congress of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Executive Summary and Recommendations One Hundred Fourteenth Congress First Session November 2015 Printed for the use of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.uscc.gov 2015 Report to Congress of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Executive Summary and Recommendations One Hundred Fourteenth Congress First Session November 2015 Printed for the use of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.uscc.gov U.S.-CHINA ECONOMIC AND SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION Hon. William A. Reinsch, Chairman Hon. Dennis C. Shea, Vice Chairman COMMISSIONERS Carolyn Bartholomew Daniel M. Slane Peter Brookes Hon. James M. Talent Robin Cleveland Hon. Katherine C. Tobin Jeffrey L. Fiedler Michael R. Wessel Hon. Carte P. Goodwin Larry M. Wortzel 2015 COMMISSION STAFF Michael R. Danis, Executive Director Kristien T. Bergerson, Senior Policy Analyst, Security and Foreign Affairs Rickisha C. Berrien-Lopez, Human Resources and Administrative Specialist Caitlin E. Campbell, Supervisory Senior Policy Analyst, Security and Foreign Affairs Anthony J. DeMarino, Congressional Liaison and Communications Director Christopher P. Fioravante, Management Analyst Lauren E. Gloudeman, Policy Analyst, Economics and Trade Katherine E. Koleski, Research Director and Policy Analyst, Economics and Trade Ethan S. Meick, Policy Analyst, Security and Foreign Affairs Kevin J. Rosier, Senior Policy Analyst, Economics and Trade Nargiza S. Salidjanova, Supervisory Senior Policy Analyst, Economics and Trade Matthew Snyder, Policy Analyst, Economics and Trade Matthew O. Southerland, Policy Analyst, Security and Foreign Affairs Kathleen Wilson, Finance and Operations Director The Commission was created on October 30, 2000, by the Floyd D.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramerican Political Science Review VCU University Archives
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Ramerican Political Science Review VCU University Archives 2020 Ramerican Political Science Review (Vol. 5, 2020) Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/ramerican Part of the Political Science Commons © The Author(s) Recommended Citation https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/ramerican/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the VCU University Archives at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ramerican Political Science Review by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Department of Political Science at Virginia Commonwealth University presents: The Ramerican Political Science Review Volume 5 2020 Table of Contents Letter from the Department of Political Science 3 Analyzing the Accuracy of Early Warning Systems in the Field of Modern Genocide and Suggested Changes: A Comparative Case Study of Myanmar, Rwanda, and Darfur 4 Jhanys Gardner, Virginia Commonwealth University The Chicken Game and the 1958 Taiwan Strait Crisis 21 Zhuoran Li, University of Virginia The Impact of VP Nominees: An Overview of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election 41 W.P. Jackson Krug, Virginia Commonwealth University The FMLN and FARC as Diverging Models of Post-Conflict Integration 59 Adam Hales, Virginia Commonwealth University Censorship and Control in the PRC 67 Robert Johnson, Virginia Commonwealth University Perpetual Neglect: An insight into the implications of a forgotten and neglected historic black cemetery 85 Nardos Iyob, Virginia Commonwealth University Book Review: When Movements Become Parties: The Bolivian MAS in Comparative Perspective by Santiago Anria 106 Chava Evans, Virginia Commonwealth University Letter from the Department of Political Science The Department of Political Science at Virginia Commonwealth University is proud to present Volume 5 of The Ramerican Political Science Review.
    [Show full text]
  • OPC Awards Showcase Ambitious Reporting in 2014
    THE MONTHLY NEWSLETTER OF THE OVERSEAS PRESS CLUB OF AMERICA, NEW YORK, NY • May 2015 OPC Awards Showcase Ambitious Reporting in 2014 and Atish Saha’s dis- EVENT RECAP section of a factory By Trish Anderton collapse in Bangla- In tones ranging from defiance desh. While heavy to joy and mourning to optimism, hitters like The New foreign correspondents gathered on York Times were April 30 to celebrate the vitality of well represented, their profession. less traditional or- “It’s time for us to take our story ganizations like Hu- back from the handwringers,” Dean man Rights Watch, Baquet, executive editor of The New Medium/Matter and York Times, proclaimed in his keynote HBO Real Sports address at the Overseas Press Club with Bryant Gumbel Michael Dames Annual Awards Dinner. “We need also turned up on the Keynote speaker Dean Baquet. to scream about the fact that there is winners’ list. Chivers described the secrecy and huge and ambitious work being done Motlagh started his reportage oppression he faced trying to discov- in the old places like The New York several months after the Rana Plaza er how many U.S. soldiers had been Times, the Los Angeles Times and disaster, which claimed more than poisoned by abandoned Iraqi chemi- the Washington Post, and in the new 1,100 lives. He said he drew inspira- cal weapons. places like BuzzFeed and Vice.” tion from Saha’s unsparing photos. “We like to think it’s Uzbekistan The same digital technologies that “He had worked the scene of the that acts like that, but you’re in a have turned the industry’s business tragedy for three weeks, every day, country that does too.” model upside down have also given it day in and day out, pouring every- Secrecy and danger were under- new tools and “enormous new audi- thing into his photographs,” Motlagh currents running through the evening.
    [Show full text]
  • How China Exploits Social Media to Sway American Opinion
    CYBER THREAT ANALYSIS Beyond Hybrid War: How China Exploits Social Media to Sway American Opinion By Insikt Group CTA-2019-0306 CYBER THREAT ANALYSIS Recorded Future analyzed data from several Western social media platforms from October 1, 2018 through February 22, 2019 to determine how the Chinese state exploits social media to influence the American public. This report details those techniques and campaigns using data acquired from Recorded Future® Platform, social media sites, and other OSINT techniques. This report will be of most value to government departments, geopolitical scholars and researchers, and all users of social media. Executive Summary Since the 2016 U.S. presidential election, researchers, reporters, and academics have devoted countless resources to understanding the role that Russian disinformation, or influence operations, played in the outcome of the election. As a result, there exists an implicit assumption that other state-run influence campaigns must look the same and operate in the same manner. However, our research demonstrates that social media influence campaigns are not a one-size-fits-all technique. We studied Chinese state-run social media influence operations and concluded that the Chinese state utilized techniques different from the Russian state. These differences in technique are driven by dissimilar foreign policy and strategic goals. President Xi Jinping has global strategic goals for China different from those President Vladimir Putin has for Russia; as a result, the social media influence techniques used by China are different from those used by Russia. Further, our research has revealed that the manner in which China has attempted to influence the American population is different from the techniques they use domestically.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Culture and Cyberwarfare Strategies: Four Case Studies Sipa Capstone Workshop
    MAY 7, 2018 STRATEGIC CULTURE AND CYBERWARFARE STRATEGIES: FOUR CASE STUDIES SIPA CAPSTONE WORKSHOP CLIENT ORGANIZATION: UNITED STATES CYBER COMMAND FACULTY ADVISOR: PROF. GREGORY RATTRAY ABDULRAHMAN YAAQOB AL-HAMADI; DANIEL NICHOLAS BOCCIO; ERIK KORN; RASHIDE ASSAD ATALA; SCOTT SCHER; AND STEVEN JUN SIC PARK Disclaimer: This report was prepared by graduate students for a SIPA Capstone Workshop. The insights and opinions expressed are their own and do not reflect the view of the United States Cyber Command. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Strategic Cultures and Cyberwarfare Strategies team would like to express its deepest gratitude to Prof. Gregory Rattray, Dr. Emily O. Goldman and Dr. Michael Warner for their dedicated knowledge-based support for the project. We are also deeply thankful to Erica Borghard, Jenny Jun, Jack Snyder, JD Work, Jason Healey, Sean Kanuck, Adam Segal, and Nadiya Kostyuk for their time and invaluable insights. 1 ABSTRACT This report presents the U.S. Cyber Command with a cross-case study based on the examination of China’s, Russia’s, Iran’s, and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s history, geography, politics, economy, religion, and philosophy in order to understand how each differing strategic culture guides the state’s motivations and behaviors. This includes each country’s employment of non-state actors and proxies, legal framework, and military-civilian relations. The strategic culture lens provides a deeper understanding of each state’s cyberwarfare strategies. By examining how current factors are shaping the most likely future trajectory and what the most dangerous trajectory could look like, we provide lessons that the U.S.
    [Show full text]