Arxiv:0709.4613V2 [Astro-Ph] 16 Apr 2008 .Quirrenbach A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Astronomy and Astrophysics Review manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) M. S. Cunha · C. Aerts · J. Christensen-Dalsgaard · A. Baglin · L. Bigot · T. M. Brown · C. Catala · O. L. Creevey · A. Domiciano de Souza · P. Eggenberger · P. J. V. Garcia · F. Grundahl · P. Kervella · D. W. Kurtz · P. Mathias · A. Miglio · M. J. P. F. G. Monteiro · G. Perrin · F. P. Pijpers · D. Pourbaix · A. Quirrenbach · K. Rousselet-Perraut · T. C. Teixeira · F. Th´evenin · M. J. Thompson Asteroseismology and interferometry Received: date M. S. Cunha and T. C. Teixeira Centro de Astrof´ısica da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762, Porto, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected] C. Aerts Instituut voor Sterrenkunde, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200 D, 3001 Leuven, Belgium; Afdeling Sterrenkunde, Radboud University Nijmegen, PO Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands. J. Christensen-Dalsgaard and F. Grundahl Institut for Fysik og Astronomi, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark. A. Baglin and C. Catala and P. Kervella and G. Perrin LESIA, UMR CNRS 8109, Observatoire de Paris, France. L. Bigot and F. Th´evenin Observatoire de la Cˆote d’Azur, UMR 6202, BP 4229, F-06304, Nice Cedex 4, France. T. M. Brown Las Cumbres Observatory Inc., Goleta, CA 93117, USA. arXiv:0709.4613v2 [astro-ph] 16 Apr 2008 O. L. Creevey High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA; Instituto de Astrofsica de Canarias, Tenerife, E-38200, Spain. A. Domiciano de Souza Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Radioastronomie, Auf dem H¨ugel 69, 53121 Bonn, Ger- many. P. Eggenberger Observatoire de Gen`eve, 51 chemin des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland; In- stitut d’Astrophysique et de G´eophysique de l’Universit´e de Li`ege All´ee du 6 Aoˆut, 17 B-4000 Li`ege, Belgium. 2 Cunha et al. Abstract Asteroseismology provides us with a unique opportunity to im- prove our understanding of stellar structure and evolution. Recent devel- opments, including the first systematic studies of solar-like pulsators, have boosted the impact of this field of research within Astrophysics and have led to a significant increase in the size of the research community. In the present paper we start by reviewing the basic observational and theoretical proper- ties of classical and solar-like pulsators and present results from some of the most recent and outstanding studies of these stars. We centre our review on those classes of pulsators for which interferometric studies are expected to provide a significant input. We discuss current limitations to asteroseismic studies, including difficulties in mode identification and in the accurate de- termination of global parameters of pulsating stars, and, after a brief review of those aspects of interferometry that are most relevant in this context, an- ticipate how interferometric observations may contribute to overcome these limitations. Moreover, we present results of recent pilot studies of pulsating stars involving both asteroseismic and interferometric constraints and look into the future, summarizing ongoing efforts concerning the development of future instruments and satellite missions which are expected to have an im- pact in this field of research. P. J. V. Garcia Centro de Astrof´ısica, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 and De- partamento de Engenharia F´ısica, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal. D. W. Kurtz Centre for Astrophysics, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK. P. Mathias Observatoire de la Cˆote d’Azur, UMR 6203, BP 4229, F-06304, Nice Cedex 4, France. A. Miglio Institut d’Astrophysique et de G´eophysique de l’Universit´ede Li`ege All´ee du 6 Aoˆut, 17 B-4000 Li`ege, Belgium. M. J. P. F. G. Monteiro Centro de Astrof´ısica e Departamento de Matem´atica Aplicada da Faculdade de Ciˆencias, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. F. P. Pijpers Space and Atmospheric Physics Group, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. D. Pourbaix F.R.S-FNRS, Institut d’Astronomie et d’Astrophysique, Universit´eLibre de Brux- elles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium A. Quirrenbach Zentrum f¨ur Astronomie der Universit¨at Heidelberg, Landessternwarte K¨onigstuhl, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany. K. Rousselet-Perraut Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de l’Observatoire de Grenoble, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France. M. J. Thompson School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Hounsfield Road, Sheffield S3 7RH, UK. Asteroseismology and interferometry 3 Keywords Stars: variables: general Stars: interiors Techniques: interferometric · · Contents 1 Introduction................................... 4 1.1 Historicalperspective . .. .. .. .. .. .. 4 1.2 Stellar modelling and the ultimate goal of asteroseismology . 6 1.3 Origin and physical nature of the oscillations . ..... 7 1.4 Selected stellar pulsators . 8 1.5 The role of interferometry . 12 2 Asteroseismology ................................ 13 2.1 Observations ............................... 13 2.2 Basic properties of the oscillations . 19 2.3 The causes of stellar oscillations . 26 2.4 Seismicinference ............................. 39 2.5 Current limitations to asteroseismic studies . ...... 60 3 Interferometry ................................. 63 3.1 Principles of astronomical interferometry . ...... 63 3.2 Stellar physics with interferometers . 66 3.3 Present instruments and capabilities . 73 3.4 Limitations of interferometers for the measurement of stellar diameters 78 3.5 Futureprojects .............................. 84 4 The Interferometry-Asteroseismology connection . ........ 89 4.1 Improving the determination of global parameters of pulsating stars 90 4.2 Modeidentification. .101 4.3 Current studies of pulsating stars including interferometric constraints113 4.4 Future studies of pulsating stars including interferometric constraints 118 5 Alookintothefuture .............................121 References......................................124 4 Cunha et al. 1 Introduction 1.1 Historical perspective Periodic variable stars have been known to exist since the 17th century, when Jan Fokkens Holwarda realized that the magnitude of Mira, a variable star discovered almost a century earlier by David Fabricius, varied periodically with a period of 11 months (Hoffleit 1997). The periodic variability observed by Holwarda is intrinsic to Mira and results from consecutive contractions and expansions of its surface, associated with waves that propagate within its interior. Stars which owe their variability to this phenomenon are known as pulsating (variable) stars. Despite the early discovery by Holwarda, the understanding that some variable stars owe their variability to intrinsic pulsations came almost three centuries later, following a suggestion by Shapley (1914) driven by the dif- ficulties with reconciling the observed variability with the hypothesis of bi- narity. At about the same time, pulsating stars started being systematically used as tools for astrophysics research following the discovery of the Period- Luminosity relation by Henrietta Leavitt (Leavitt 1908; Pickering 1912). Classical pulsating stars have since been used as “standard candles” of the Universe and, still today, are of fundamental importance for the determina- tion of astrophysical distances. During the decades that followed the discovery by Henrietta Leavitt, the theoretical studies of classical pulsating stars were directed towards the math- ematical description of the pulsations and the understanding of the mech- anism behind their excitation (e.g., Zhevakin 1963, and references therein). In the early 60s, the discovery and interpretation of solar oscillations (Leighton et al. 1962; Frazier 1968; Ulrich 1970) opened a new era in the study of pulsat- ing stars. Solar oscillations have been shown to be amazing tools to ‘look’ inside the Sun and image its structure and dynamics. The study of so- lar oscillations fostered the development of an entire new field of research – known as Helioseismology (e.g., Gough 1977a; Duvall 1982; Duvall et al. 1984; Christensen-Dalsgaard et al. 1985) – which has proved extremely suc- cessful in probing the physics of the solar interior (see Christensen-Dalsgaard 2002, for a recent review on helioseismology). Following on the success of helioseismology, attempts to use intrinsic os- cillations of stars other than the Sun to learn about their internal structure and dynamics have led to the development of Asteroseismology. However, the road-map to success of asteroseismology proved much harder, as result of the limitations brought about by our incapacity to resolve distant stars, and also by the limited number of oscillation frequencies observed in most of them. In fact, even though many different classes of pulsating stars are presently known – most of these are shown in Fig. 1 – not all classes of pulsators are suitable for asteroseismic studies (cf. Section 1.4). The 21st century has brought important new developments to asteroseis- mology. With highly precise spectrometers such as CORALIE and HARPS (at ESO-La Silla), UCLES (at AAT), and UVES (at ESO-Paranal) fully operational, it was finally possible to make clear detections of solar-like oscil- Asteroseismology and interferometry 5 Fig. 1 Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram showing different classes of pulsating stars. Some of these are named after a particular member of the class. Others are acronyms, standing, respectively, for: rapidly oscillating Ap (roAp); Slowly Pulsat- ing B (SPB); subdwarf B