DOCSLIB.ORG

Thematic Moot Court

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Thematic Moot Court: Brief Notes and Materials Part I (Units 1 to 3) Elias N. Stebek St. Mary’s University College, Faculty of Law Sponsored by Justice and Legal System Research Institute Addis Ababa, Ethiopia September 2009 JUSTICE AND LEGAL SYSTEM RESEARCH INSTITUTE Thematic Moot Court: Brief Notes and Materials Elias N. Stebek St. Mary’s University College, Faculty of Law General Introduction (pages 1-4) Part I (pp. 5-132) Part II (pp. 133- 253) ii Thematic Moot Court: Brief Notes and Materials (September 2009) Contents Page Contents ................................................................................................................... iii Preface ...................................................................................................................... vi General Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 Part I – Moot Court: Purposes, Preparation and Briefs Overview .................................................................................................................. 5 Unit 1- Learning and Competitive Aspects of Moot Court 1.1- Specific Learning Outcomes ................................................................................. 6 1.2- Unit Introduction .................................................................................................... 6 1.3- Tasks: Week 1 ........................................................................................................... 9 1.4- Readings: Week 1 Reading 1: Introductory excerpts ........................................................................ 10 Reading 2: Darby Dickerson, “In Re Moot Court” .............................................. 12 Reading 3: Michael V. Hernandez, “In Defense of Moot Court…” .................... 17 Reading 4: Alex Kozinski, “In Praise of Moot Court –Not!” ............................... 21 Reading 5: Graves & Vaughan “The Willem C. Vis ... Moot…” ........................ 31 Reading 6: J. Waincymer “… Legal Education through ... Moot Program …” ... 39 Review Exercises .......................................................................................................... 59 Unit 2- Research and Analysis 2.1- Specific Learning Outcomes ............................................................................... 61 2.2- Unit Introduction .................................................................................................. 62 2.3- Tasks: Weeks 2 and 3 .............................................................................................. 64 2.4- Readings: Weeks 2 and 3 Reading 1: Schmedemann & Kunz, The Structure of Legal Rules ...................... 66 Reading 2: Murray & DeSanctis (Readings 2.1 to 2.6) ...................................... 72 - Rule of law and legal reasoning (72) - Organization of legal writing (75) - Editing tips (81) - Legislative history (83) - Strategies for research and determining when you are finished (85) - Adversarial legal writing (89) Reading 3: Diane Penneys Edelman, [Research for Jessup memorials] ............... 92 Contents iii Review Exercises .......................................................................................................... 99 Unit 3- Brief Writing [[ 3.1- Specific Learning Outcomes ............................................................................. 102 3.2- Unit Introduction ................................................................................................ 102 3.3- Tasks: Weeks 4, 5 and 6 ........................................................................................ 104 3.4- Readings: Weeks 4, 5 and 6 Reading 1: Criteria for judging memorials & briefs (Readings 1.1 – 1.3) ..... 106 Reading 2: Brian L. Porto, The Art of Appellate Brief Writing ........................... 112 Reading 2: Pregerson & Paiter-Thorne, 7 Virtues of … Brief Writing ............ 119 Reading 3: Murray & DeSanctis, Appellate Briefs .............................................. 123 Reading 4: Tips on the Structure of Briefs (Readings 4.1 and 4.2) ................ 126 Review Exercises ........................................................................................................ 128 Part II – Oral Rounds (Weeks 7 to 16) Overview .............................................................................................................. 133 Unit 4- Oral Augment and Persuasion Skills [[ 4.1- Specific Learning Outcomes ............................................................................. 135 4.2- Unit Introduction ................................................................................................ 136 4.3- Tasks: Week 7 ........................................................................................................ 140 4.4- Readings: Week 7 Reading 1: Robert J. Martineau, Fundamentals of Modern Appellate Advocacy .. 141 Reading 2: Graves & Vaughan, Advocacy and the Art of Persuasion ................ 148 Reading 3: Schmedemann & Kunz, The Science of Advocacy ........................... 151 Reading 4: Michael Vitiello, Teaching Effective Oral Argument Skills ............... 157 Reading 5: Shepherd & Cherrick, Advocacy and Emotion .................................. 165 iv Thematic Moot Court: Brief Notes and Materials (September 2009) Unit 5- Sample Thematic Moot Courts [[ 5.1- Specific Learning Outcomes ............................................................................. 173 5.2- Unit Introduction ................................................................................................ 173 5.3- Tasks: Week 7 to 16 ............................................................................................... 177 Initial Rounds (Weeks 8 to 14) Advanced Rounds (i.e. Semi final and final) Semifinal oral contest (Week 15) Final round oral contest (Week 16) 5.4- Readings: Section 1- Jessup Reading 1: About Jessup (Readings 1.1 & 1.2) ................................................. 179 1.1- Oral round grading 1.2- Frequently Asked Questions about the Jessup Competition Reading 2: Jessup Official Rules (2010), Rules 6-8, 10 & 11 ............................ 190 Reading 3: Harry H. Almond, Jr., “Strengthening … Jessup … ....................... 208 Section 2- African Human Rights Moot Court .......................................... 217 Reading 4: African Human Rights Competition ............................................. 219 4.1- About African Human Rights Competition ........................... 219 4.2- Official Rules: Instructions to Judges ...................................... 220 4.3- Sample score sheet ..................................................................... 222 4.3- Sample moot problem ............................................................... 223 Section 3- APAP’s Moot Court Reading 5: APAP’s Moot Court Competition .................................................. 229 5.1- Rules of APAP’s Moot Court Competition ............................ 229 5.2- Written pleading score sheet .................................................... 233 5.3- Score sheet for the selection of Best Oralist ............................ 234 5.4- Oral argument score sheet ........................................................ 235 5.5- Sample moot problem ............................................................... 237 Annexes (I to IV) ............................................................................................................. 241 Bibliography .................................................................................................................... 253 __________ Contents v Preface Thematic Moot court is an elective course offered under the designation (… University Moot Court. It has the objective of facilitating the efforts of students to deepen and reinforce the advocacy skills nurtured in other courses that deal with trial advocacy and appellate advocacy. Law schools are expected to design at least one thematic moot court course depending upon legal issues that need to be explored through research and advocacy from the perspectives of a petitioner and respondent. The themes might be Family Law, Successions, Law of Property, Contracts, Criminal Law, Human Rights, etc. based upon the area chosen by the law school. The other option could be thematic choice based on the law school’s plans to participate in national moot court competitions such as the one organized by APAP (Action Professionals’ Association for the People). The theme of the moot court can also be determined based on a law school’s plans to participate in regional and international moot courts. This reading material has two parts. Part I discusses the purpose of moot court and it deals with the phases of preparation and brief writing. Part II addresses Oral Rounds with particular focus on the Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition which can be used as a sample thematic moot court competition with regard to guidelines and assessment mechanisms. Ethiopian law schools have been participating in various regional and international moot courts such as Philip C. Jessup International Moot Court Competition held in Washington DC, African Human Rights Moot Court Competition held in various African countries, ELSA (European Law Schools Association) Moot Court Competition (on International Trade) and others. Thematic moot court will indeed create a conducive training ground for students who aspire towards success in such national, regional and international moot court competitions.
Recommended publications
  • The Importance of Trial Experience in the Training of Law Students

    The Importance of Trial Experience in the Training of Law Students

    Volume 58 Issue 2 Dickinson Law Review - Volume 58, 1953-1954 1-1-1954 The Importance of Trial Experience in the Training of Law Students Frank Smith Follow this and additional works at: https://ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/dlra Recommended Citation Frank Smith, The Importance of Trial Experience in the Training of Law Students, 58 DICK. L. REV. 131 (1954). Available at: https://ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/dlra/vol58/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Dickinson Law IDEAS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dickinson Law Review by an authorized editor of Dickinson Law IDEAS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DICKINSON LAW REVIEW THE IMPORTANCE OF TRIAL EXPERIENCE IN THE TRAINING OF LAW STUDENTS By FRANK SMITH* In the many years that I have been on the bench, I have on many occasions been called upon to sit as a judge in moot court arguments of students of the law schools of Philadelphia. In most instances I have been pleased with the evident preparation and the oral arguments of the students. The subject is usually one of interest and is calculated to display research and the ability and ingenuity of coun- sel. In most instances the students realize the point involved and know how to buttress their arguments with cases in point. The briefs they submit are generally good, well typed, and neat. So as far as moot court arguments are concerned, it is apparent that the instructors and professors of the law schools have done their work well.
  • Asia Pacific Regional Arbitration Group Conference 2011

    Asia Pacific Regional Arbitration Group Conference 2011

    APR - SEPT 2011 Newsletter of Kuala Lumpur Regional Centre for Arbitration KDN PQ/PP 1505 (6818) HIGHLIGHT Asia Pacific Regional Arbitration Group Conference 2011 Interview HE Professor Rahmat Mohamad, Secretary General of AALCO Feature What is Adjudication? KLRCA’s Mediation/Conciliation Rules 2011 Effective Resolution Settling Disputes Through Arbitration KLRCA newslette r APRIL - SEPT 2011 Contents 25 03 Director’s Message 04 News Bulletin 05 Events 08 Highlight Asia Pacific Regional Arbitration Group Conference 2011 11 Events 15 Interview Cross-Continent Co-operation His Excellency Professor Rahmat Mohamad, Secretary-General of the Asian-African Legal Consultative Organisation The Centre invites readers to 18 Feature contribute articles and materials of interest for publication in future What is Adjudication? issues. Articles and materials that are published contain views of the 24 Events writers concerned and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Centre. 26 Update KLRCA’s Mediation/Conciliation Rules 2011 Information in the newsletter has been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable and in 28 Feature good faith, but no representation, Effective Resolution expressed or implied, is made as to Settling Disputes Through Arbitration their accuracy, completeness, or correctness. Accordingly the Centre accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential 31 Mark Your Calendar! loss or damage arising from the use 08 of information in this newsletter, reliance or any information contained herein, any error, omission or Publisher inaccuracy in any such information or any action resulting therefrom. Kuala Lumpur Regional Centre for Arbitration No. 12, Jalan Conlay, 50450 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia This newsletter is also available Tel : +603 - 2142 0103 Fax: +603 - 2142 4513 on our website, www.klrca.org.my, Email: [email protected] under the Resource Centre section.
  • Memorial for the European Union

    Memorial for the European Union

    Memorial on Behalf of the European Union (EU) INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION CONCERNING FRESHWATER RIGHTS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW IN RELATION TO THE POTENTIAL LEGAL PERSONALITY OF RIVERS AND THE CLIMATE CRISIS MEMORIAL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION THE 1st WCEL INTERNATIONAL WATER JUSTICE MOOT COURT AT THE CONFERENCE OF JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS ON WATER JUSTICE DURING THE 8th WORLD WATER FORUM IN BRASÍLIA, BRAZIL MARCH 2018 AGENT FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION: MATIJA KAJIĆ, LL.M, UTRECHT UNIVERSITY ADVISOR: ANOESKA BUIJZE 1st WCEL International Water Justice Moot Court – 8th World Water Forum – Brasília The agents and organizations in this moot court are participating for educational purposes only and have no actual attorney client relationship. 1 Memorial on Behalf of the European Union (EU) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Anoeska Buijze, Assistant Professor of Administrative Law at Utrecht University, the Netherlands. Hendrik Schoukens, Post-Doc staff member at the University of Ghent, assisting with the courses ‘Moot Court Public International Law’ and ‘Diplomatic Law’. Work of researchers at the Utrecht Centre for Water, Oceans and Sustainability Law. Work of researchers at RENFORCE (the Utrecht Centre for Regulation and Enforcement in Europe). 1st WCEL International Water Justice Moot Court – 8th World Water Forum – Brasília The agents and organizations in this moot court are participating for educational purposes only and have no actual attorney client relationship. 2 Memorial on Behalf of the European Union (EU) I. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES 4 II. STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION 7 III. PROBLEM PRESENTED 8 IV. IN CONTEXT: EUROPEAN UNION 10 V.
  • European Final of the European Moot Court Competition Takes Place at the Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg on 5 April

    European Final of the European Moot Court Competition Takes Place at the Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg on 5 April

    Court of Justice of the European Union PRESS RELEASE No 47/19 Luxembourg, 4 April 2019 Press and Information All European Final of the European Moot Court Competition takes place at the Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg on 5 April The European Law Moot Court Competition is the world’s largest Moot Court in EU Law. Organised for the first time during the 1988-1989 academic year, this competition, which this year celebrates its 30th anniversary, has as its primary objective the promotion of practical knowledge of EU law amongst law students. Law students, who have already made their way through a tough selection of around 80 teams since September 2018 when the European Law Moot Court Competition was launched, will plead on 5 April before panels composed of Members of the Court of Justice and the General Court of the European Union. The competing teams represent eight universities from different countries. They won their respective Regional Finals which were held in February 2019 in Ljubljana (Slovenia), Madrid (Spain), Florence (Italy) and Athens (Greece). Students from all EU member states participated in the competition. Those who participated in the Regional Finals also included students from non-EU countries, notably the USA, Switzerland, Norway, Ukraine and Russia. The final is the last stage of this competition, which has been held at the Court of Justice since 1991. Unofficial document for media use, not binding on the Court of Justice. Press contact: Corina Gabriela Socoliuc (+352) 4303 4293 www.curia.europa.eu .
  • Dr. Thaatchaayini Kananatu

    Dr. Thaatchaayini Kananatu

    Dr. Thaatchaayini Kananatu Email: [email protected] ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7532-5438 Profile Academic with experience teaching law for undergraduates and postgraduates. Chevening Scholar with multidisciplinary research interest in socio-legal scholarship, law in context, the intersections of law, race and gender, as well as in ethics, human rights and social justice. Academic Senior Lecturer in Law (July 2020 – ongoing) Work Department of Business Law & Taxation, School of Business, Monash University, Experience Malaysia Department Coordinator (January 2019 – ongoing) Lecturer in Law (July 2016 – December 2019) Teaching: Chief Examiner, Unit Coordinator and Lecturer for Ethics and Global Corporate Governance, and International Trade Law for postgraduate students undertaking the Master of International Business; and International Trade Law for undergraduate students. Previously lectured Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics. Teaching & Learning Initiatives: • Used the Assurance of Learning (AOL) continuous improvement process to implement continuous improvement in teaching. Attended the AOL Seminar I (AACSB) in October 2019 to learn how to measure effectiveness of aligning assessments to course learning objectives. • Implemented the Research Skills Development (RSD) Framework to develop research-led teaching and learning. Developed assessments and marking rubrics using the RSD Framework for the International Trade Law module. • Completed the Foundation for Effective Teaching under the Monash Continuing Education Excellence Development (CEED) programme. • Constructed and designed the curriculum for a new unit Ethics and Global Corporate Governance incorporating business and human rights, and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Engagement/Service: • Department coordinator and representative for the School Education Committee (2019 onwards). School coordinator for the Diploma in Higher Education Studies (DHES) programme (2017 – ongoing).
  • Prof. David D. Walter Academic Experience

    Prof. David D. Walter Academic Experience

    PROF. DAVID D. WALTER 11200 SW 8th Street RDB 2055 Miami, FL 33199 Office: (305) 348-8339 E-Mail: walterd @fiu.edu ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE Florida International University College of Law, Miami, Florida Co-Director, Legal Skills & Values Program, January 2009-Present Professor, Legal Skills & Values Program, 2013-Present Interim Director, Legal Skills & Values Program, May 2005-May 2007 Associate Professor, Legal Skills & Values Program, 2002-2013 Courses: – Legal Skills & Values I, 2002-2007 – Taught legal analysis, synthesis, research, objective writing, client interviewing, client counseling, and professionalism (30-40 first-year students – Fall Semesters) – Legal Skills & Values II, 2003-2006 – Taught persuasive pretrial and appellate writing and oral advocacy and professionalism (30-40 first-year students – Spring Semesters) – Legal Skills & Values III, 2005-Present – Teach cover letter/resume writing, contract drafting, correspondence drafting, negotiations, pleading drafting, persuasive pretrial memo writing, and professionalism (16-20 second- and third-year students – Fall and Spring Semesters) – Appellate Procedure I, Fall 2004-Present – Teach advanced persuasive appellate brief writing skills, appellate oral advocacy skills, and relevant appellate rules and procedure topics in conjunction with the FIU Board of Advocates Intramural Appellate Advocacy Competition (35-45 second-year day and third-year evening students – Fall Semesters) – Appellate Procedure II – Designed course focusing on appellate practice and procedure in the Florida
  • Curriculum Vitae

    Curriculum Vitae

    Assoc. Prof., Assist. Prof. ANA VLAHEK, PhD GENERAL DATA: Title: Associate Professor of civil and commercial law, University of Ljubljana Assistant Professor of European law, University of Ljubljana Contact details: University of Ljubljana Faculty of Law T + 386 1 420 31 54 Poljanski nasip 2 F + 386 1 420 31 15 SI - 1000 Ljubljana E [email protected] Slovenia EMPLOYMENT: 2016 – present: university professor at Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana, Department of Private Law: - lecturing EU law, antitrust enforcement law, contracts, insolvency law, land law at Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana - lecturing EU law at Faculty of Administration in Ljubljana - lecturing property law at Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering in Ljubljana - mentoring ELMC and CEEMC moot court teams 2011 – 2016: university docent at Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana, Department of Private Law: - lecturing EU law, contracts, commercial law, insolvency law, and land law at Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana - lecturing EU law at Faculty of Administration and at Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana - lecturing property law at Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana - mentoring ELMC and CEEMC moot court teams 2008 - present: senior research fellow at Institute for Comparative Law at the Faculty of Law in Ljubljana 2003 – 2011: researcher and academic assistant at Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana, Department of Private Law: - lecturing EU law, contracts, property law, international commercial law, and antitrust at Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana - lecturing EU law at Faculty of Administration, University of Ljubljana - lecturing property law at Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana - mentoring ELMC, CEEMC and Willem C.
  • Smubrochure.Pdf

    Smubrochure.Pdf

    SMU LAW SCHOOL The Singapore Government, in a major review of the domestic supply of lawyers, confirmed a shortage of lawyers in Singapore. 2007 hence marked a major milestone in the development of legal education in Singapore – the setting up of the nation’s second law school. SMU is honoured to be entrusted with this important responsibility. As Singapore’s first private university and the only university here with a city campus purpose-built to its pedagogy of small class size and interactive learning, SMU will be extending its unique approach to its School of Law. SMU’s undergraduate law programme aims to mould students into excellent lawyers who will contribute significantly to society. The objective is to produce law graduates who have contextualised legal expertise and the ability to think across disciplines and geographical borders. In terms of pedagogy, SMU’s seminar-style learning will be put to good effect to nurture students who are confident, articulate and analytically agile. CONTENTS 03 Dean’s Message 04 Investing In The Fundamentals // Rigorous and Challenging Curriculum // Holistic Pedagogy & Course Assessment // Optional Second Major // Wide Range of Double Degree Options // Beneficial Internship & Community Service // Internship Partners 09 Commitment To Excellence // Scholarships & Awards // National & International Competitions // International Exchange 12 Career Prospects // Raising The Bar 13 Visionary Campus // City Campus // Facilities 15 Strengthening Our Relevance // Centre for Dispute Resolution // International Islamic Law and Finance Centre // Pro Bono Centre // Asian Peace-building and Rule of Law Programme 18 Heeding The Best // Advisory Board Members 19 Top Notch Faculty // Deanery // Faculty 24 The Fun Stuff // Beyond The Classroom Dean’s Message The School of Law was started in 2007 after a major review of legal education in Singapore concluded that it was timely to have a second law school in Singapore.
  • Kobe University School of Law Comprises About 1,100 Students (800 JPY1,353,600 (Approx

    Kobe University School of Law Comprises About 1,100 Students (800 JPY1,353,600 (Approx

    Kobe University Kobe LL.M. GMAP in LAW Mission The Kobe LL.M. combines coursework in international business law with The Kobe LL.M. seeks to cultivate well- electives in dispute management, rounded practitioners able to understand economics, business administration, and both the law and the practice of business management. Courses address international business. Many courses both theoretical and practical aspects of focus on practical skills and include role- international business. plays and interactive exercises that simulate international practice. Our Courses are taught by a core faculty of mission is to prepare students to find jobs academics and lawyers from and prosper in international law firms, jurisdictions around the world. Class international business enterprises, and sizes are kept small to assure a international organizations. favorable teacher-to- student ratio. A busy calendar of academic and social events brings teachers and students Features together regularly. At a Glance Leading thinkers and practitioners around the world, in close collaborating - Graduate degree in international with the faculty members of Kobe business law taught in English University, design and deliver the - Combines an LL.M. program with multidisciplinary courses and workshops experiential training for Kobe LL.M. students. - 1-2 years to complete with commencement in the fall or spring - Instruction by top international Curriculum academics and lawyers - Internships in law firms, arbitral Courses institutions, international organizations, and
  • Memorial of the Applicant

    Memorial of the Applicant

    Canada-United States Law Journal Volume 37 Issue 1 Article 4 2012 Memorial of the Applicant James van Wyck Justin Dick Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cuslj Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation James van Wyck and Justin Dick, Memorial of the Applicant, 37 Can.-U.S. L.J. 45 (2012) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cuslj/vol37/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canada-United States Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 2011-2012 NIAGARA INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION A DISPUTE ARISING UNDER THE STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE FEBRUARY, 2012 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES (Applicant) V. THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA (Respondent) MEMORIAL OF THE APPLICANT James van Wyck & Justin Dick TABLE OF CONTENTS INDEX OF AUTHORITIES ............................... 47 STATEMENT OF FACTS .................................. 49 STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION .................... ..... 52 QUESTIONS PRESENTED ............................... 53 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ....................... ...... 53 ARGUMENT ................................. ......... 53 I. CANADA'S INTERVENTION INTO TANGOON WAS NOT LAWFUL UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW .................. 53 A. Canada's actions violate fundamental principles of the United Nations, including the prohibition on the use of force and the preeminence of sov- 46 CANADA-UNITED STATES LA WJOURNAL [Vol. 37, No. 1] ereignty..............................................54 1. The prohibition on the use of force ..................... 54 2. The importance of state sovereignty .................... 54 B. The principle of collective self-defense does not justify Canada's un- lawful entry into Tangoon ......................
  • Another Season of Record-Breaking International Moot Court Achievements (SMU) Siyuan CHEN Singapore Management University, Siyuanchen@Smu.Edu.Sg

    Another Season of Record-Breaking International Moot Court Achievements (SMU) Siyuan CHEN Singapore Management University, [email protected]

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Research Collection School Of Law School of Law 11-2017 Another season of record-breaking international moot court achievements (SMU) Siyuan CHEN Singapore Management University, [email protected] Eunice CHUA Singapore Management University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research Part of the Education Law Commons, and the International and Comparative Education Commons Citation CHEN, Siyuan and CHUA, Eunice. Another season of record-breaking international moot court achievements (SMU). (2017). Singapore Law Gazette. Research Collection School Of Law. Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2495 This Magazine Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Collection School Of Law by an authorized administrator of Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. For more information, please email [email protected]. SMU Classification: Restricted EVENTS November 2017 Another Season of Record-Breaking International Moot Court Achievements (SMU) by Chen Siyuan and Eunice Chua Another Season of Record-Breaking International Moot Court Achievements for Singapore Management University
  • A SPORTING SUCCESS Persevering Through 2019

    A SPORTING SUCCESS Persevering Through 2019

    NEWSLETTER #03 DECEMBER 2019 A SPORTING SUCCESS Persevering Through 2019 Special Contribution A Jewel of International Law: In Conversation 5 with Monica Feria-Tinta Special Contribution The World of Expedited Procedures and 13 Emergency Arbitrators: In Conversation with Mohanadass Kanagasabai Special Contribution An Insight into the FinTech Industry: In 21 Conversation with Mohammad Ridzuan Abdul Aziz & Chiara Accornero www.aiac.world #aiacworld TABLE OF CONTENTS Director’s Message 4 Key Insight 25 Special Contribution 5 AIAC Evening Talk Series: Energy Contracts and A Jewel of International Law: In Conversation with Arbitration Monica Feria-Tinta Event Highlight 26 Event Highlight 9 Inaugural AIAC-Bar Council – CIArb Joint Conference AIAC September Sports Month 2019 2019 Special Contribution 13 Think Tank 27 The World of Expedited Procedures and Emergency Comparative Analysis of the Dispute Resolution Arbitrators: In Conversation with Mohanadass Mechanisms in the “FIDIC Red Book 2017” and the Kanagasabai “AIAC Standard Form Building Contract 2019” by 36 Event Highlight 16 John Coghlan AIAC’s India ADR Training Initiative in New Delhi, India Event Highlight Key Insight 17 ADNDRC Conference 2019 – “Manage Domain 31 Interview with the Champion of the 3rd AIAC-ICC Names and Trademarks in the E-Business World” Pre-Moot – National Law University (Bhopal) Event Highlight 32 Key Insight 19 Kuala Lumpur Summit on Commercial Dispute Interview with the Winner of the Malaysian Final of the Resolution in China 3rd AIAC-ICC Pre-Moot – International Islamic Event Highlight 33 University Malaysia (Team 1) AIAC Evening Talk Series: Alternative Dispute Special Contribution 21 Resolution and FinTech An Insight into the FinTech Industry: In Conversation Key Insight 34 with Mohammad Ridzuan Abdul Aziz & Chiara The AIAC’s Capacity Building and Outreach Initiatives Accornero Announcement 36 Case Summaries 37 Events Calendar - Save the Date! 41 Published by: *This edition of the AIAC Newsletter has been edited and designed by the AIAC Newsletter Team.