<<

Solving some r-process issues in chemical evolution

Ralph Schönrich (Oxford)

Paul McMillan, Laurent Eyer, Walter Dehnen James Binney, Michael Aumer, Luca Casagrande Martin Asplund, David Weinberg Hokotezaka et al. (2018) Chemical evolution

gas

inflow/onflow

IGM

Chemical evolution

gas

Fe-rich inflow/onflow

SNIa SNII+Ib,c IGM a-rich progenitors

stars Chemical evolution

gas

Fe-rich inflow/onflow

SNIa SNII+Ib,c IGM a-rich r-process progenitors outflow NM stars Hokotezaka et al. (2018) Some simple thoughts Assume constant loss fraction from yields

What about the thick disc ridge?

Neutron mergers → r process later Doing a simple model Doing a simple model Chemical evolution

gas

Fe-rich inflow/onflow

SNIa SNII+Ib,c IGM a-rich r-process progenitors outflow NM stars Trying to escape the usual links

Hot air does not only make you fly, it can delay your evolution Short-lived isotopes in the early

Wasserburg et al. (2006) Chemical evolution

gas

condensation

warm cool evaporation Fe-rich inflow/onflow

direct enrichment

SNIa SNII+Ib,c IGM a-rich r-process progenitors outflow NM stars Introducing the hot gas phase Introducing the hot gas phase Some simple thoughts Assume constant loss fraction from yields

What about the thick disc ridge?

Neutron star mergers → r process later Some simple thoughts Assume constant loss fraction from yields

What about the thick disc ridge?

Neutron star mergers → r process later Using the different factor Using the different factor Summary

The hot vs. cold ISM is central for the evolution of „early“ elements

Neutron star mergers (at reasonable DTDs) cannot be the dominant source of r process in Classical chemical evolution models

Neutron star mergers feasible when involving hot/cold ISM

„Abundance gradients“ can be inverted by inside-out formation (next pages) What's going on with gradients?

Schoenrich & McMillan (2017) Inverting gradients

normalisation SFR churning blurring ISM Inverting gradients

Stellar metallicity ISM metallicity SFR Radial mixing Inverting gradients

specific SFH Total SF

Put all painful steps as trivial exercise into the problem set Inverting gradients

Everyone has solved this already Gradient profiles

Lee et al. (2012) profile

S & M 2017 The significance of kinematic trends Stellar densities in the [Fe/H]-[O/Fe] plane stellar radial migration forms naturally the two ridges no gap in or merger needed „thick disc“ log(density) „upper“ part of ISM trajectories ISM trajectories 10 7.5 5 2.5 kpc

„thin disc“ not the consequence of a local ISM trajectory near „endpoints“ of ISM trajectories

density contours 0.5 dex

Schoenrich & Binney (2009b) NM to hot phase Different SNIa DTD