DOCSLIB.ORG

Counting Prime Polynomials and Measuring Complexity and Similarity of Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Counting Prime Polynomials and Measuring Complexity and Similarity of Information Counting Prime Polynomials and Measuring Complexity and Similarity of Information by Niko Rebenich B.Eng., University of Victoria, 2007 M.A.Sc., University of Victoria, 2012 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulllment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering © Niko Rebenich, 2016 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopying or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Counting Prime Polynomials and Measuring Complexity and Similarity of Information by Niko Rebenich B.Eng., University of Victoria, 2007 M.A.Sc., University of Victoria, 2012 Supervisory Committee Dr. Stephen Neville, Co-supervisor (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering) Dr. T. Aaron Gulliver, Co-supervisor (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering) Dr. Venkatesh Srinivasan, Outside Member (Department of Computer Science) iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Stephen Neville, Co-supervisor (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering) Dr. T. Aaron Gulliver, Co-supervisor (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering) Dr. Venkatesh Srinivasan, Outside Member (Department of Computer Science) ABSTRACT This dissertation explores an analogue of the prime number theorem for polynomi- als over nite elds as well as its connection to the necklace factorization algorithm T-transform and the string complexity measure T-complexity. Specically, a precise asymptotic expansion for the prime polynomial counting function is derived. The approximation given is more accurate than previous results in the literature while requiring very little computational eort. In this context asymptotic series expan- sions for Lerch transcendent, Eulerian polynomials, truncated polylogarithm, and polylogarithms of negative integer order are also provided. The expansion formu- las developed are general and have applications in numerous areas other than the enumeration of prime polynomials. A bijection between the equivalence classes of aperiodic necklaces and monic prime polynomials is utilized to derive an asymptotic bound on the maximal T- complexity value of a string. Furthermore, the statistical behaviour of uniform random sequences that are factored via the T-transform are investigated, and an accurate probabilistic model for short necklace factors is presented. Finally, a T-complexity based conditional string complexity measure is proposed and used to dene the normalized T-complexity distance that measures similarity between strings. The T-complexity distance is proven to not be a metric. However, the measure can be computed in linear time and space making it a suitable choice for large data sets. iv Contents Supervisory Committee ii Abstract iii Table of Contents iv List of Tables vii List of Figures ix List of Nomenclature xi Acknowledgements xv Dedication xvi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Contributions ................................ 3 1.2 DissertationOutline. 4 2 Algebraic and Number Theory Background 6 2.1 Notation ................................... 6 2.2 CyclicGroups ................................ 7 2.3 FiniteFields ................................. 9 2.3.1 FiniteFieldExtensions . 9 2.4 Primitive Roots of Unity and Cyclotomic Cosets . ..... 12 2.5 MonicIrreduciblePolynomialsandNecklaces . ..... 14 2.5.1 Bounding the Number of Monic Irreducible Polynomials ... 17 2.5.2 DensityofMonicIrreduciblePolynomials . 18 2.5.3 AperiodicandPeriodicNecklaces . 19 v 2.6 Summary................................... 23 3 An Analogue of the Prime Number Theorem for Polynomials over Finite Fields 24 3.1 EnumerationofPrimePolynomials . 25 3.2 Asymptotic Expansions of the Truncated Polylogarithm . ....... 29 3.3 ThePrimePolynomialTheoremforFiniteFields . .... 41 3.4 ComputationalResults . 43 3.5 Summary................................... 56 4 The T-Transform and T-Complexity 57 4.1 BackgroundandRelatedWork . 57 4.1.1 ComputationalComplexity . 57 4.1.2 AlgorithmicComplexity . 58 4.1.3 DeterministicComplexityandRandomness . 58 4.2 Notation ................................... 62 4.3 T-Augmentation ............................... 63 4.4 TheT-Transform............................... 65 4.4.1 TheNaïveT-TransformAlgorithm . 66 4.4.2 T-TransformAlgorithmEvolution. 69 4.5 T-Complexity ................................ 71 4.5.1 BoundingT-Complexity . 71 4.6 ComputationalResults . 74 4.7 Summary................................... 77 5 The T-Complexity of Uniformly Distributed Random Sequences 78 5.1 RelatedWork................................. 78 5.2 Conjectures on the Statistics of the T-Transform . ....... 79 5.2.1 The T-augmentation Level Distribution of Short Necklaces . 82 5.2.2 The T-handle Length Distribution of Short Necklaces . .... 92 5.2.3 BeyondShortNecklaces . 98 5.3 Summary................................... 103 6 Measuring String Similarity 104 6.1 TheNormalizedInformationDistance . 104 6.2 TheNormalizedCompressionDistance . 105 vi 6.3 TheNormalizedT-ComplexityDistance . 107 6.3.1 MetricViolation. 110 6.4 Summary................................... 113 7 Conclusions 114 7.1 FutureWork ................................. 115 A Supplemental Materials 117 A.1 MapleSourceCode ............................. 117 Bibliography 121 vii List of Tables 4 Table 2.1 Finite eld representation for F2[t]/(t + t + 1). ......... 20 Table 2.2 Cyclotomic cosets for F16. ..................... 21 Table 2.3 Cyclotomic cosets of F2m and binary necklaces of length m=4. 22 Table 3.1 Asymptotic approximations to , (z) for z = 0.2. ....... 45 An K Table 3.2 Asymptotic approximations to , (z) for z = 2. ........ 46 An K Table 3.3 Asymptotic approximations to , (z) for z = 7 + 11i. .... 47 An K − Table3.4 Euleriannumbertriangle. 48 Table 3.5 Asymptotic approximations to (z,s,m) for z = 3, s = 1. ... 49 LN Table 3.6 Relative approximation error of (z,s,m) for z = 3, s = 1.. 51 LN Table 3.7 Relative approximation error of (z,s,m) for z = 1.25, s = 2. 52 LN Table 3.8 Relative approximation error of (z,s,m) for LN z = 9 + 2.5i, s = 5. ......................... 53 − Table 3.9 Absolute approximation error of the monic prime polynomial counting function for q = 2. ............. 54 Table 3.10 Relative approximation error of the monic prime polynomial counting function estimates for q = 2. ....... 55 Table 4.1 Computational complexity of LZ string factorization algorithms............................... 60 Table 4.2 Computational complexity of T-transform algorithms.. 70 Table 4.3 Comparison of lower and asymptotic bound on maximal T-complexity. ............................ 75 Table 4.4 Comparison of upper and asymptotic bound on maximal T-complexity. ............................ 76 Table 5.1 Exponential T-augmentation level probability model parameterestimation. 87 viii Table 5.2 Goodness of t test and exponential PDF parameter estimations. ............................. 88 Table 6.1 T-transform of string x#y. ..................... 108 Table 6.2 T-transform of string y#x. ..................... 109 Table 6.3 T-transform results for all pairwise concatenations of the three strings x, y, and z. ...................... 112 ix List of Figures Figure 2.1 Binary necklaces of length m = 4.................. 22 Figure 3.1 Comparison of empirical and optimal truncation of (z,s,m) for z = 3, s = 1. ..................... 48 LN Figure 3.2 Absolute approximation error of (z,s,m) for LN z = 3, s = 1underoptimaltruncation. 50 Figure 4.1 Example of a binary T-code construction. ..... 64 Figure 4.2 Pseudo-code listing of naïve T-transform algorithm. 66 Figure 4.3 T-transform at intermediate T-augmentation level i. ...... 67 Figure 4.4 Comparison of upper, lower, and asymptotic bound on maximalT-complexity. 75 Figure 5.1 T-complexity of random sequence x versus minimal and maximalT-complexitybounds. 80 Figure 5.2 Histogram of υ(x) for |x| = 232 bits for 512 binary uniform randomsequences. 81 Figure 5.3 Empirical and modelled cumulative distribution function of T-augmentation levels of x............... 82 Figure 5.4 Probability of the occurrence of a necklace of length m at T-augmentation level ℓ........................ 84 Figure 5.5 Quantile-quantile plot for necklaces length 1 to 10 over ℓ.... 85 Figure 5.6 Quantile-quantile plot for necklaces length 11 to 20 over ℓ. .. 86 Figure 5.7 Empirical and modelled CDFs for T-augmentation level ℓ. .. 89 Figure 5.8 Error between empirical and modelled PDFs for T-augmentation level ℓ with m from1to10. 90 Figure 5.9 Error between empirical and modelled PDFs for T-augmentation level ℓ with m from11to20. 91 Figure 5.10 Quantile-quantile plot for necklaces length 1 to 10 over h.... 93 x Figure 5.11 Quantile-quantile plot for necklaces length 11 to 20 over h. .. 94 Figure 5.12 Empirical and modelled CDFs for T-handle length |x˜i |...... 95 Figure 5.13 Error between empirical and modelled PDFs for T-handle length h with m from1to10. .............. 96 Figure 5.14 Error between empirical and modelled PDFs for T-handle length h with m from11to20. 97 Figure 5.15 Modelled and average empirical necklace count per length m over512trials. ...................... 99 Figure 5.16 Sample standard deviation for the necklace count per length m over512trials. ...................... 100 Figure 5.17 Error between modelled and average empirical necklace count per length m.......................... 101 Figure 5.18 Logarithmic ratio of modelled and average empirical necklace count per length m..................... 102 xi Nomenclature Mathematical Functions A(n,k) Eulerian
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Combinatorics, the Eulerian Number A(N, M), Is the Number of Permutations of the Numbers 1 to N in Which Exactly M Elements A
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In combinatorics, the Eulerian number A(n, m), is the number of permutations of the numbers 1 to n in which exactly m elements are greater than the previous element (permutations with m "ascents"). They are the coefficients of the Eulerian polynomials: The Eulerian polynomials are defined by the exponential generating function The Eulerian polynomials can be computed by the recurrence An equivalent way to write this definition is to set the Eulerian polynomials inductively by Other notations for A(n, m) are E(n, m) and . 1History 2 Basic properties 3 Explicit formula 4 Summation properties 5 Identities 6 Eulerian numbers of the second kind 7 References 8 External links In 1755 Leonhard Euler investigated in his book Institutiones calculi differentialis polynomials α1(x) = 1, α2(x) = x + 1, 2 α3(x) = x + 4x + 1, etc. (see the facsimile). These polynomials are a shifted form of what are now called the Eulerian polynomials An(x). For a given value of n > 0, the index m in A(n, m) can take values from 0 to n − 1. For fixed n there is a single permutation which has 0 ascents; this is the falling permutation (n, n − 1, n − 2, ..., 1). There is also a single permutation which has n − 1 ascents; this is the rising permutation (1, 2, 3, ..., n). Therefore A(n, 0) and A(n, n − 1) are 1 for all values of n. Reversing a permutation with m ascents creates another permutation in which there are n − m − 1 ascents. Therefore A(n, m) = A(n, n − m − 1).
    [Show full text]
  • A Unified Approach to Combinatorial Triangles: a Generalized Eulerian Polynomial
    A unified approach to combinatorial triangles: a generalized Eulerian polynomial Bao-Xuan Zhu∗ School of Mathematics and Statistics, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, PR China Abstract Motivated by the classical Eulerian number, descent and excedance numbers in the hyperoctahedral groups, an triangular array from staircase tableaux and so on, we study a triangular array [ n,k]n,k 0 satisfying the recurrence relation: T ≥ cd n,k = λ(a0n + a1k + a2) n 1,k + (b0n + b1k + b2) n 1,k 1 + (n k + 1) n 1,k 2 T T − T − − λ − T − − with = 1 and = 0 unless 0 k n. We derive a functional transformation T0,0 Tn,k ≤ ≤ for its row-generating function (x) from the row-generating function A (x) of Tn n another array [An,k]n,k satisfying a two-term recurrence relation. Based on this transformation, we can get properties of and (x) including nonnegativity, Tn,k Tn log-concavity, real rootedness, explicit formula and so on. Then we extend the famous Frobenius formula, the γ positivity decomposition and the David-Barton formula for the classical Eulerian polynomial to those of a generalized Eulerian polynomial. We also get an identity for the generalized Eulerian polynomial with the general derivative polynomial. Finally, we apply our results to an array from the Lambert function, a triangu- lar array from staircase tableaux and the alternating-runs triangle of type B in a unified approach. arXiv:2007.12602v1 [math.CO] 24 Jul 2020 MSC: 05A15; 05A19; 05A20; 26C10 Keywords: Eulerian numbers; Eulerian polynomials; Recurrence relations; Gener- ating functions; Real zeros; Log-concavity; Strong q-log-convexity; γ-positivity; 1 Introduction 1.1 Eulerian numbers Let Sn denote the symmetric group on n-elements [n]= 1, 2,...,n .
    [Show full text]
  • Factorial Stirling Matrix and Related Combinatorial Sequences
    Linear Algebra and its Applications 357 (2002) 247–258 www.elsevier.com/locate/laa Factorial Stirling matrix and related combinatorial sequencesୋ Gi-Sang Cheon a,∗, Jin-Soo Kim b aDepartment of Mathematics, Daejin University, Pocheon 487-711, Republic of Korea bDepartment of Mathematics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Republic of Korea Received 21 November 2001; accepted 9 April 2002 Submitted by R.A. Brualdi Abstract In this paper, some relationships between the Stirling matrix, the Vandermonde matrix, the Benoulli numbers and the Eulerian numbers are studied from a matrix representation of k!S(n,k) which will be called the factorial Stirling matrix, where S(n,k) are the Stirling numbers of the second kind. As a consequence a number of interesting and useful identities are obtained. © 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. AMS classification: 05A19; 05A10 Keywords: Stirling number; Bernoulli number; Eulerian number 1. Introduction In many contexts (see [1–4]), a number of interesting and useful identities involv- ing binomial coefficients are obtained from a matrix representation of a particular counting sequence. Such a matrix representation provides a powerful computational tool for deriving identities and an explicit formula related to the sequence. First, we begin our study with a well-known definition: for any real number x and an integer k,define ୋ This work was supported by the Daejin University Research Grants in 2001. ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: gscheon@road.daejin.ac.kr (G.-S. Cheon), lion@math.skku.ac.kr (J.-S. Kim). 0024-3795/02/$ - see front matter 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernoulli and Euler Polynomials
    Bernoulli and Euler Polynomials Güneş Çatma Submitted to the Institute of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Mathematics Eastern Mediterranean University July 2013 Gazimağusa, North Cyprus Approval of the Institute of Graduate Studies and Research Prof. Dr. Elvan Yılmaz Director I certify that this thesis satisfies the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Mathematics. Prof. Dr. Nazım Mahmudov Chair, Department of Mathematics We certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Mathematics. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sonuç Zorlu Oğurlu Supervisor Examining Committee 1. Prof. Dr. Nazım Mahmudov 2. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mehmet Ali Özarslan 3. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sonuç Zorlu Oğurlu ABSTRACT This thesis provides an overview of Bernoulli and Euler numbers. It describes the Bernoulli and Euler polynomials and investigates the relationship between the classes of the two polynomials. It also discusses some important identities using the finite difference calculus and differentiation. The last part of this study is con- cerned with the Generalized Bernoulli and Euler polynomials. Furthermore, the properties obtained in the second chapter are also examined for the generalized Bernoulli and Euler polynomials in this part of the thesis. The Complemen- tary Argument Theorem, the generating functions, the Multiplication and the Euler-Maclauren Theorems are widely used in obtaining the mentioned results. Keywords: Bernoulli -Euler Polynomials, Generalized Bernoulli -Euler Polyno- mials, Finite Difference iii OZ¨ Bu ¸calı¸smadaBernoulli ve Euler sayıları ile Bernoulli ve Euler polinom- ları arasındaki ili¸skilerincelenmi¸stir.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized Eulerian Numbers
    JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIALTHEORY, Series A 32, 195-215 (1982) Generalized Eulerian Numbers D. H. LEHMER Department of Mathematics, University of Cal$ornia, Berkeley, California 94720 Received March 17, 1981 DEDICATED TO PROFESSOR MARSHALL HALL, JR., ON THE OCCASION OF HIS RETIREMENT 1. INTRODUCTION The Eulerian numbers (not to be confused with the Euler numbers E,) were discovered by Euler in 1755 [I]. Since then, they have been rediscovered, redefined, generalized and used by many authors [2-151. Explicitly they can be defined for 0 < k < n by k-l A(n,k)= 1 (-1)’ (k -j)“. j=O Euler wrote g+ f z-z,(x) P/n! n=O and (x - 1)” H,(x) = i A@, k) xk-‘. &=I This can be expressed by the generating function l-u = 1 + 2 f A@, k) ukt”/n! 1 - u exp{t(l - u)} &=I n=l from which the recurrence relation A@+ l,k)=(n-k+2)A(n,k- l)+kA(k,t) (3) is easily derived (see, for example, Comtet [ 15, Vol. 1, pp. 63-641. 195 0097-3 165/82/020195-21$02.00/O Copyright 0 1982 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. 196 D. H. LEHMER The connections between A(n, k) and the polynomials of Bernoulli and Euler, such as ml(x)-B,(O)) = ;:r (X+;-l)A(n-l,k), were among the first discoveries made. Later Eulerian Numbers began to occur in combinatorial problems and A@, k) is best remembered as the number of permutations 1 2 )...) n $l), 742) ,***,70) that have precisely k - 1 “rises,” where a rise is a pair of consecutive marks n(i), n(i + 1) with n(i) < n(i + 1).
    [Show full text]
  • General Eulerian Polynomials As Moments Using Exponential Riordan Arrays
    1 2 Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 16 (2013), 3 Article 13.9.6 47 6 23 11 General Eulerian Polynomials as Moments Using Exponential Riordan Arrays Paul Barry School of Science Waterford Institute of Technology Ireland pbarry@wit.ie Abstract Using the theory of exponential Riordan arrays and orthogonal polynomials, we demonstrate that the general Eulerian polynomials, as defined by Xiong, Tsao and Hall, are moment sequences for simple families of orthogonal polynomials, which we characterize in terms of their three-term recurrence. We obtain the generating functions of this polynomial sequence in terms of continued fractions, and we also calculate the Hankel transforms of the polynomial sequence. We indicate that the polynomial sequence can be characterized by the further notion of generalized Eulerian distribution first introduced by Morisita. We finish with examples of related Pascal-like triangles. 1 Introduction The triangle of Eulerian numbers 10 0 000 ... 10 0 000 ... 11 0 000 ... 14 1 000 ... , 1 11 11 1 0 0 ... 1 26 66 26 1 0 ... . . .. 1 with its general elements k n−k n +1 n +1 A = (−1)i (k − i + 1)n = (−1)i (n − k − i)n, n,k i i i=0 i=0 X X along with its variants, has been studied extensively [1, 10, 14, 15, 17, 18]. It is closely associated with the family of Eulerian polynomials k En(t)= An,kt . k X=0 The Eulerian polynomials have exponential generating function ∞ xn t − 1 E (t) = . n n! t − ex(t−1) n=0 X It can be shown that the sequence En(t) is the moment sequence of a family of orthogonal polynomials [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Eulerian Polynomials and B-Splines
    Eulerian Polynomials and B-Splines Tian-Xiao He Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Illinois Wesleyan University Bloomington, IL 61702-2900, USA Abstract Here presented is the interrelationship between Eulerian polynomials, Eule- rian fractions and Euler-Frobenius polynomials, Euler-Frobenius fractions, B- splines, respectively. The properties of Eulerian polynomials and Eulerian frac- tions and their applications in B-spline interpolation and evaluation of Riemann zeta function values at odd integers are given. The relation between Eulerian numbers and B-spline values at knot points are also discussed. AMS Subject Classification: 41A80, 65B10, 33C45, 39A70. Key Words and Phrases: B-spline, Eulerian polynomial, Eulerian Number, Eulerian Fraction, exponential Euler polynomial, Euler-Frobenius polynomial, and Euler-Frobenius fractions. 1 Introduction Eulerian polynomial sequence fAn(z)gn≥0 is defined by the following summation (cf. for examples, [1], [2], and [3]): X An(z) `nz` = ; jzj < 1: (1.1) (1 − z)n+1 `≥0 It is well-known that the Eulerian polynomial, An(z) (see p. 244 of [3]), of degree n can be written in the form n X k An(z) = A(n; k)z ;A0(z) = 1; (1.2) k=1 where A(n; k) are called the Eulerian numbers that can be calculated by using k X n + 1 A(n; k) = (−1)j (k − j)n; 1 ≤ k ≤ n; (1.3) j j=0 1 2 T. X. He and A(n; 0) = 1. The Eulerian numbers are found, for example, in the standard treatises by Riordan [4], Comtet [3], Aigner [5], Grahm et al. [6], etc. However, their n notations are not standard, which are shown by A , A(n; k), W , , and n;k n;k k E(n; k), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized J-Factorial Functions, Polynomials, and Applications
    1 2 Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 13 (2010), 3 Article 10.6.7 47 6 23 11 Generalized j-Factorial Functions, Polynomials, and Applications Maxie D. Schmidt University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL 61801 USA maxieds@gmail.com Abstract The paper generalizes the traditional single factorial function to integer-valued mul- tiple factorial (j-factorial) forms. The generalized factorial functions are defined recur- sively as triangles of coefficients corresponding to the polynomial expansions of a subset of degenerate falling factorial functions. The resulting coefficient triangles are similar to the classical sets of Stirling numbers and satisfy many analogous finite-difference and enumerative properties as the well-known combinatorial triangles. The generalized triangles are also considered in terms of their relation to elementary symmetric poly- nomials and the resulting symmetric polynomial index transformations. The definition of the Stirling convolution polynomial sequence is generalized in order to enumerate the parametrized sets of j-factorial polynomials and to derive extended properties of the j-factorial function expansions. The generalized j-factorial polynomial sequences considered lead to applications expressing key forms of the j-factorial functions in terms of arbitrary partitions of the j-factorial function expansion triangle indices, including several identities related to the polynomial expansions of binomial coefficients. Additional applications include the formulation of closed-form identities and generating functions for the Stirling numbers of the first kind and r-order harmonic number sequences, as well as an extension of Stirling’s approximation for the single factorial function to approximate the more general j-factorial function forms. 1 Notational Conventions Donald E.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized Euler Sums
    Generalized Eulerian Sums Fan Chung∗ Ron Graham∗ Dedicated to Adriano Garsia on the occasion of his 84th birthday. Abstract In this note, we derive a number of symmetrical sums involving Eu- lerian numbers and some of their generalizations. These extend earlier identities of Don Knuth and the authors, and also include several q-nomial sums inspired by recent work of Shareshian and Wachs on the joint distri- bution of various permutation statistics, such as the number of excedances, the major index and the number of fixed points of a permutation. We also produce symmetrical sums involving \restricted" Eulerian numbers which count permutations π on f1; 2; : : : ; ng with a given number of descents and which, in addition, have the value of π−1(n) specified. 1 Introduction n The classical Eulerian numbers, which we will denote by k , occur in a variety of contexts in combinatorics, number theory and computer science (see [4]). These numbers were introduced by Euler [3] in 1736 and have many interesting properties. We list some small values in Table 1. k 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 n 3 1 4 1 0 0 0 4 1 11 11 1 0 0 5 1 26 66 26 1 0 6 1 57 302 302 57 1 n Some Eulerian numbers k Table 1 n In particular, k enumerates the number of permutations π on [n] := f1; 2; : : : ; ng which have k descents (i.e., i ≤ n−1 with π(i) > π(i+1) ) as well as the number ∗University of California, San Diego 1 of permutations π on [n] which have k excedances (i.e., i < n with π(i) > i).
    [Show full text]
  • Eulerian Polynomials and Polynomial Congruences 1
    Volume 14, Number 1, Pages 46{54 ISSN 1715-0868 EULERIAN POLYNOMIALS AND POLYNOMIAL CONGRUENCES KAZUKI IIJIMA, KYOUHEI SASAKI, YUUKI TAKAHASHI, AND MASAHIKO YOSHINAGA Abstract. We prove that the Eulerian polynomial satisfies certain polynomial congruences. Furthermore, these congruences characterize the Eulerian polynomial. 1. Introduction The Eulerian polynomial A`(x)(` ≥ 1) was introduced by Euler in the study of sums of powers [5]. In this paper, we define the Eulerian polynomial A`(x) as the numerator of the rational function 1 ` X d 1 A`(x) (1.1) F (x) = k`xk = x = : ` dx 1 − x (1 − x)`+1 k=1 2 2 The first few examples are A1(x) = x; A2(x) = x + x ;A3(x) = x + 4x + 3 2 3 4 x ;A4(x) = x + 11x + 11x + x , etc. The Eulerian polynomial A`(x) is a monic of degree ` with positive integer coefficients. Write A`(x) = P` k k=1 A(`; k)x . The coefficient A(`; k) is called an Eulerian number. In the 1950s, Riordan [10] discovered a combinatorial interpretation of Eulerian numbers in terms of descents and ascents of permutations, and Carlitz [3] defined q-Eulerian numbers. Since then, Eulerian numbers are actively studied in enumerative combinatorics. (See [4, 11, 8].) Another combinatorial application of the Eulerian polynomial was found in the theory of hyperplane arrangements [15, 14]. The characteristic poly- nomial of the so-called Linial arrangement [9] can be expressed in terms of the root system generalization of Eulerian polynomials introduced by Lam and Postnikov [6]. The comparison of expressions in [9] and [15] yields the following.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of the Combinatorics of Poly-Bernoulli Numbers 3
    EXTENSIONS OF THE COMBINATORICS OF POLY-BERNOULLI NUMBERS BEATA´ BENYI´ AND TOSHIKI MATSUSAKA Abstract. In this paper we extend the combinatorial theory of poly-Bernoulli numbers. We prove combinatorially some identities involving poly-Bernoulli polynomials. We in- troduce a combinatorial model for poly-Euler numbers and provide combinatorial proofs of some identities. We redefine r-Eulerian polynomials and verify Stephan’s conjecture concerning poly-Bernoulli numbers and the central binomial series. 1. Introduction Poly-Bernoulli numbers were introduced by Kaneko [14] using polylogarithm function. His work motivated several studies in the same manner, such as further generalizations of these numbers and analogue definitions based on the polylogarithm function. These numbers and their relatives have also beautiful combinatorial properties and arise in dif- ferent research fields, such as discrete tomographie, mathematics of origami, biology, etc. [13, 25, 27, 34]. In this work we show some possible directions of studies motivated by the combinatorial treatment of these numbers. First, we introduce two models for interpreting the poly- Bernoulli polynomials and in order to show their usefulness we provide combinatorial proofs for some known identities. In Section 3 we consider poly-Euler numbers and extend one of the combinatorial interpretations of poly-Bernoulli numbers that helps in the combinatorial analysis of poly-Euler numbers of the first and second kind studied in [20, 32]. Section 4 is devoted to r-Eulerian polynomials, which we define a new way and use for verifying a conjecture concerning a relation between the central binomial series and poly-Bernoulli numbers observed by Stephan and stated by Kaneko [15].
    [Show full text]
  • Permutations, Products, Posets, and Pfaffians
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Mathematics Mathematics 2015 Combinatorial Potpourri: Permutations, Products, Posets, and Pfaffians Norman B. Fox University of Kentucky, bradfox87@gmail.com Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Fox, Norman B., "Combinatorial Potpourri: Permutations, Products, Posets, and Pfaffians" (2015). Theses and Dissertations--Mathematics. 25. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/math_etds/25 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Mathematics at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Mathematics by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact UKnowledge@lsv.uky.edu. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I agree that the document mentioned above may be made available immediately for worldwide access unless an embargo applies. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of my work.
    [Show full text]