Commissioners Consider Lobbyists to Represent Grand County
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Grand County Master Plan Was Adopted by the Grand County Planning Commission on ______, 2011 by Resolution No
Grand County Department of Planning and Zoning February 9, 2011 GRAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Gary Salberg, Chairman Lisa Palmer, Vice-Chair Sally Blea Steven DiSciullo George Edwards Karl Smith Ingrid Karlstrom Mike Ritschard Sue Volk GRAND COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS James L. Newberry, Commissioner District I Nancy Stuart, Commissioner District II Gary Bumgarner, Commissioner District III The Grand County Master Plan was adopted by the Grand County Planning Commission on __________________, 2011 by Resolution No. ______________. The Master Plan was prepared by: Grand County Department of Planning & Zoning, 308 Byers Ave, PO Box 239, Hot Sulphur Springs, CO 80451 (970)725-3347 and Belt Collins 4909 Pearl East Circle Boulder, CO 80301 (303)442-4588 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................iv Chapter 1 Planning Approach & Context .................................................................................................1 Chapter 2 Building a Planning Foundation .............................................................................................17 Chapter 3 Plan Elements ...........................................................................................................................32 Chapter 4 Growth Areas, Master Plan Updates & Amendments ..........................................................51 Appendix A Growth Area Maps ...............................................................................................................53 -
':Ieis-0116-Fs
.':IEIS-0116-FS COVER SHEET DOE/EIS-0 I 16-FS Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Stat ement for the Blue River-Gore Pass Portion of the Hayden-Blue River Transmission Line Proj ect • Grand and Summit Counties, Colorado Lead Agency U.S. Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administrat ion Cooperating Agencies U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Electrification Administrat ion U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Abstract This environmental impact statement (EIS) assesses the environmental effects of constructing, operating, and maintaining about 30 mi les of 230/345-kV trans mission line between the existing Gore Pass Substat ion northwest of Kremmling, Colorado, and a proposed new substat ion (not part of this action) near the Ute Pass Road. The action includes minor work at the Gore Pass Substation and at two taps, and also the removal of two existing transmission lines; a 69-kV line between Gore Pass Substation and Green Mountain Power Plant and a 1 15-kV line between Green Mountain Power Plant and Blue River Tap. The purpose of the project is to provide additional transmission capacity into the areas of Gore Pass, Granby, Green Mountain, Dillon, Climax, Oak Creek, and Keystone, and between the generation plants in western Colorado and the major load areas in eastern Colorado. Alternat ives assessed include routing and design alternatives plus the alternatives addressed in the Hayden-Blue River Final EIS, issued by the Rural Electrification Administration in July, 1982. For Further Information, Contact Bi 11 Melander Western Area Power Administrat ion Loveland-Fort Col I ins Area Office P .0. -
Laramide Minor Faulting in the Colorado Front Range
NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES, BULLETIN 160, 2004 181 Laramide minor faulting in the Colorado Front Range 1 2 Eric A. Erslev, Steven M. Holdaway , Stephanie A. O’Meara , 3 4 Department of Earth Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Branislav Jurista , and Bjorn Selvig 1Now at Chevron USA Production Company, P.O. Box 36366, Houston, TX 77236 2Now at Colorado State University/National Park Service, 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 200, Fort Collins, CO 80525 3Now at Westshore Consulting, 2534 Black Creek Road, Muskegon, MI 49444 4Now at RETEC, 23 Old Town Square, Suite 250, Fort Collins, CO 80524 Abstract The nature of Laramide basementinvolved deformation in the Rocky Mountains remains highly con troversial, sparking a continuing debate between advocates of vertical, thrust and strikeslip tectonic models. The Front Range of Colorado provides an important geographic link between the northwest trending arches of Wyoming, which are commonly attributed to thrust deformation, and the north trending arches of the southern Rockies of New Mexico, which are commonly attributed to partitioned rightlateral transpression. Fault separations and kinematics provide effective tests of Laramide structural models for the Front Range arch. In the center of the arch, exposures of Precambrian crystalline rocks show no evidence of consistent strikeslip separations on northstriking faults, indicating that major rightlateral displace ments, if present, must be located on the margins of the arch. Fault kinematics were studied by meas uring nearly 5,000 slickensided faults in Mesozoic strata flanking the Front Range arch. The over whelming dominance of thrust and strikeslip minor faults with lowangle slickenline plunges falsi fies vertical tectonic hypotheses invoking dipslip on highangle faults. -
Rocky Mountain Cluster Plan
D-!,5'1 - The U.S. Department of Interior F;Je : National Park Service's 'lt.I}DWs-IDn Systemwide Archeological Inventory Program: Rocky Mountain Cluster Plan by James A. Truesdale Department of Anthropology University of Wyoming with contributions by Adrienne Anderson and Ann Johnson Yellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-CR-98-1 1998 _ ___j • / I / ' • ~ I The U.S. Department of Interior National Park Service's Systemwide Archeological Inventory Program: Rocky Mountain Cluster Plan by James A. Truesdale Department of Anthropology University of Wyoming with contributions by Adrienne Anderson and Ann Johnson Yellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-CR-98-1 1998 • • How to cite this document: Truesdale, James, A. 1998. The U.S. Department of Interior National Park Service's Systemwide Archeological Inventory Program: Rocky Mountain Cluster Plan. Yellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, YCR-CR-98-1. Front Cover: Rare wickiup structure or conical timbered lodge, 1955 (24YE301 ), Yellowstone National Park. • • TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................... IV Site Data Bases ................................................. 37 Artifact Locations and Storage Conditions ...... 37 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................ v National Register of Historic Places ................ 37 Underwater Projects ........................................ -
An Archaeological Assessment of the Gunsight Pass Site: 5Ga4251 Archaeoastronomy and Landscape Archaeology in Middle Park, Grand County, Colorado
For Official Use Only: Disclosure of Site Locations Prohibited (43 CFR 7.18) AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE GUNSIGHT PASS SITE: 5GA4251 ARCHAEOASTRONOMY AND LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY IN MIDDLE PARK, GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO. Revised 06/15/2017. Completed for The Colorado Historical Society State Historical Fund Project No. 2013-AS-003 Prepared By Brian O’Neil and Cheryl A. Harrison with contributions by Holly Shelton and Nicole Inman Michael S. Berry, Principal Investigator Dominquez Archaeological Research Group, Inc. 2832 Unaweep Avenue P.O. Box 3543 Grand Junction, Colorado 81502 ARPA Permit No. C-67009 DARG Project # D-2012-7 Submitted to History Colorado, the Colorado Historical Society 1200 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80203 ABSTRACT The Gunsight Pass Site (5GA4251) is in the Middle Park region of the Southern Rocky Mountains physiographic province, Grand County, Colorado. It is situated atop a prominent north-south trending ridge, southeast of Gunsight Pass, at an average elevation of 8500 feet. The site was first identified in July 2011, as an open architectural and open lithic scatter consisting of multiple surficial and half-buried rock alignments. The purpose of the archaeological assessment was to provide a detailed recording of the stone features and determine whether they represent domiciles or ceremonial features associated with vision quests, or possible astronomical alignments. Additionally, orientations toward potential sacred landscapes such as Whitely Peak, Wolford Mountain, or the Sulphur Gulch area were examined. Another significant goal of the assessment was to provide data on the site for its consideration as a Traditional Cultural Property (TCP) relevant to historic Ute, Arapahoe, and eastern Shoshoni tribes. -
VISION a Science-Based Approach to Rewilding the Southern Rockies
Southern Rockies Wildlands Network VISION A Science-Based Approach to Rewilding the Southern Rockies July 2003 Lead Authors Brian Miller • Dave Foreman • Michelle Fink • Doug Shinneman Jean Smith • Margaret DeMarco • Michael Soulé • Robert Howard For additional information contact: Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project Margaret DeMarco, Executive Director 4990 Pearl East Circle, Suite 301 Boulder, CO 80301 303.258.0433 www.RestoreTheRockies.org [email protected] ©2003 by the Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project. All illustrations ©Evan Cantor, cover illustration – Lost Creek Wilderness Design and layout Todd Cummings CONTENTS Acknowledgements . .vi Introduction . .1 SECTION I: BACKGROUND FOR THE SOUTHERN ROCKIES WILDLANDS NETWORK VISION . .4 CHAPTER 1: A VISION FOR THE WILDLANDS NETWORK DESIGN . .5 1. INTRODUCTION . .5 2. VISION . .6 3. ELEMENTS OF A WILDLANDS NETWORK VISION . .7 CHAPTER 2: NATURAL LANDSCAPES OF THE SOUTHERN ROCKIES ECOREGION . .11 1. INTRODUCTION . .11 2. GEOLOGICAL AND LANDFORM BACKGROUND . .11 3. CLIMATE . .12 4. DRAINAGE BASINS AND AQUATIC SYSTEMS . .13 5. NATURAL PROCESSES AND LANDSCAPE PATTERN . .13 6. ECOSYSTEMS AND NATURAL COMMUNITIES . .14 Semi-Desert and Sagebrush Shrublands . .14 Montane Shrubland . .15 Piñon-Juniper Woodland . .16 Ponderosa Pine Forest and Woodland . .17 Douglas-Fir Forest . .18 Lodgepole Pine Forest . .19 Aspen Forests . .19 Montane and Intermontane Grasslands . .20 Limber Pine and Bristlecone Pine Forests . .20 Engelmann Spruce - Subalpine Fir Forests . 21 Alpine Tundra . .22 Aquatic Ecosystems: Wetland and Riparian . .22 Plains Steppe and Great Basin Grasslands . .25 Other Ecosystems of Note . .26 7. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTION OF PLANTS AND WILDLIFE . .26 8. SPECIES AND COMMUNITIES AT RISK . .27 9. CONCLUSION . .28 CHAPTER 3: THE HUMAN LANDSCAPE . -
Geology and Petroleum Potential, Colorado Park Basin Province, North-Central Colorado
GEOLOGY AND PETROLEUM POTENTIAL, COLORADO PARK BASIN PROVINCE, NORTH-CENTRAL COLORADO By Edwin K. Maughan United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 88-450 E A summary of structural, stratigraphic and related geological elements that have influenced oil and gas occurrences in the intermontane Colorado Parks. 1988 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey standards and nomenclature, TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION............................................................. 1 Structure............................................................. 1 Source Rocks.......................................................... 2 Hydrocarbon Occurrence................................................ 2 REGIONAL GEOLOGY......................................................... 3 STRATIGRAPHY............................................................. 12 Mississippian......................................................... 12 Pennsylvanian and Permian............................................. 13 Triassic.............................................................. 14 Jurassic.............................................................. 14 Cretaceous............................................................ 15 Tertiary.............................................................. 17 STRUCTURE................................................................ 17 EXPLORATION SUMMARY...................................................... 21 PLAY DESCRIPTIONS....................................................... -
14.50 in Kremmling
Page 2 GRAND GAZETTE August 6, 2020 www.GrandGazette.net To the editor... Thanks from Crooked Creek Trap Club The Crooked Creek Trap Club Parks and Wildlife, and the Crooked Let us keep our republic would like to thank the Friends of Creek Trap Club’s shooting activities NRA for raising the funds, the NRA are designed to promote firearm safety, To the editor: also said; "... we can witness our federal Foundation for their generous 2020 to enhance marksmanship skills of Are you aware of the violence government sending agents to use grant award, and Colorado Parks and those participating in the shooting that is ongoing in our big cities? You tear gas and batons against peaceful Wildlife for their generous 2020 grant sports, and to educate the general may not hear much about it from demonstrators." Another lie. They award. public about firearms. your news sources. You may not hear were used only against the rioters who Both of these grant awards are for For more information regarding much about it from Social Media/ deserved it. He used "democracy" and the expansion and improvement of the the grants, please contact https:// Big Tech. You certainly won't hear "true democracy" several times. Just club’s pistol range and pistol league. crookedcreektrapclub.com/ anything about it from the Democrat in case your media doesn't tell you, we We are pleased that these organizations candidates! Yet it is real, menacing and have a Republic not a "Democracy.” In are making an investment in our frightening. "Protests" regularly turn case your government education didn't Sincerely, community. -
Geology of the Gore Canyon-Kremmling.Area
Geology of the Gore Canyon- Kremmling area, Grand County, Colorado Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Barclay, C. S. Venable Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 23/09/2021 15:48:22 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/347644 GEOLOGY OF THE GORE CANYON-KREMMLING. AREA, GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO by ■ ' . C . S. Venable Barclay A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements - For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY.OF ARIZONA 19 6 8 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of re quirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judg ment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholar ship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. -
Systemwide Archeological Inventory Program: Rocky Mountain Cluster Plan
D-t,5'1 - The U.S. Department of Interior f; Je : National Park Service's '/t. J/DIA)s-lon Systemwide Archeological Inventory Program: Rocky Mountain Cluster Plan by James A. Truesdale Department of Anthropology University of Wyoming with contributions by Adrienne Anderson and Ann Johnson Yellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-CR-98-1 1998 _ ___J • / ' • ~ I The U.S. Department of Interior National Park Service's Systemwide Archeological Inventory Program: Rocky Mountain Cluster Plan I '• by James A. Truesdale Department of Anthropology University of Wyoming with contributions by Adrienne Anderson and Ann Johnson Yellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-CR-98-1 1998 • • How to cite this document: Truesdale, James, A. 1998. The U.S. Department of Interior National Park Service's Systemwide Archeological Inventory Program: Rocky Mountain Cluster Plan. Yellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, YCR-CR-98-1. Front Cover: Rare wickiup structure or conical timbered lodge, 1955 (24YE301 ), Yellowstone National Park. • • TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................... IV Site Data Bases ................................................. 37 Artifact Locations and Storage Conditions ...... 37 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................ v National Register of Historic Places ................ 37 Underwater Projects