DOCSLIB.ORG

Transcription Factor Evolution in Eukaryotes and the Assembly of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transcription Factor Evolution in Eukaryotes and the Assembly of The Transcription factor evolution in eukaryotes and PNAS PLUS the assembly of the regulatory toolkit in multicellular lineages Alex de Mendozaa,b,1, Arnau Sebé-Pedrósa,b,1, Martin Sebastijan Sestakˇ c, Marija Matejciˇ cc, Guifré Torruellaa,b, Tomislav Domazet-Losoˇ c,d, and Iñaki Ruiz-Trilloa,b,e,2 aInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas–Universitat Pompeu Fabra), 08003 Barcelona, Spain; bDepartament de Genètica, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain; cLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics, Ruder Boskovic Institute, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia; dCatholic University of Croatia, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia; and eInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, 08010 Barcelona, Spain Edited by Walter J. Gehring, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, and approved October 31, 2013 (received for review June 25, 2013) Transcription factors (TFs) are the main players in transcriptional of life (6, 15–22). However, it is not yet clear whether the evo- regulation in eukaryotes. However, it remains unclear what role lutionary scenarios previously proposed are robust to the in- TFs played in the origin of all of the different eukaryotic multicellular corporation of genome data from key phylogenetic taxa that lineages. In this paper, we explore how the origin of TF repertoires were previously unavailable. shaped eukaryotic evolution and, in particular, their role into the In this paper, we present an updated analysis of TF diversity emergence of multicellular lineages. We traced the origin and ex- and evolution in different eukaryote supergroups, focusing on pansion of all known TFs through the eukaryotic tree of life, using the various unicellular-to-multicellular transitions. We report genome broadest possible taxon sampling and an updated phylogenetic background. Our results show that the most complex multicellular and/or transcriptome data from several unicellular relatives of fi fi lineages (i.e., those with embryonic development, Metazoa and Metazoa and Fungi (including one lasterean, ve ichthyosporeans, Embryophyta) have the most complex TF repertoires, and that these a nucleariid, and the incertae sedis Corallochytrium limacisporum), repertoires were assembled in a stepwise manner. We also show that and use published data from key, but previously unsampled, eu- EVOLUTION a significant part of the metazoan and embryophyte TF toolkits karyotic lineages, such as Glaucophyta, Haptophyta, Rhizaria, and evolved earlier, in their respective unicellular ancestors. To gain Cryptophyta. We show that an important fraction of the metazoan insights into the role of TFs in the development of both embryo- TF toolkit is not novel but rather appeared in the root of Opis- phytes and metazoans, we analyzed TF expression patterns through- thokonta and/or Holozoa. Similarly, we show that many plant TFs out their ontogeny. The expression patterns observed in both groups are present in unicellular chlorophytes, and many fungal TFs are recapitulate those of the whole transcriptome, but reveal some present in microsporidians and nucleariids. Finally, we analyze the important differences. Our comparative genomics and expression data reshape our view on how TFs contributed to eukaryotic evo- TFome (i.e., the general TF repertoire) expression throughout lution and reveal the importance of TFs to the origins of multicellu- embryonic development in embryophytes and metazoans and show larity and embryonic development. that each phylostratigraphic layer of TFs differentially contributes to successive stages of embryonic development, linking the evolu- phylotypic stage | Holozoa | LECA tionary history of TFs to organismal ontogeny. ranscription factors (TFs) are proteins that bind to DNA in Significance Ta sequence-specific manner (1) and enhance or repress gene – expression (2 4). In response to a broad range of stimuli, TFs Independent transitions to multicellularity in eukaryotes in- coordinate many important biological processes, from cell cycle volved the evolution of complex transcriptional regulation progression and physiological responses, to cell differentiation toolkits to control cell differentiation. By using comparative and development (5, 6). Thus, TFs have a central role in the genomics, we show that plants and animals required richer transcriptional regulation of all cellular organisms, being present transcriptional machineries compared with other eukaryotic in all branches of the tree of life (bacteria, archaea, and eukar- multicellular lineages. We suggest this is due to their orches- yotes). There appears to be a correlation between elaborate trated embryonic development. Moreover, our analysis of regulation of gene expression and the complexity of organisms transcription factor (TF) expression patterns during the de- ’ (7), such that the amount (as a proportion of an organism s total velopment of animals reveal links between TF evolution, spe- gene content) and diversity of TF proteins is expected to be di- cies ontogeny, and the phylotypic stage. rectly correlated with this complexity (8). Indeed, TFs play a crucial role in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, TFs are Author contributions: A.d.M., A.S.-P., T.D.-L., and I.R.-T. designed research; A.d.M., A.S.-P., the master regulators of embryonic development in embryophytes M.S.S., and M.M. performed research; G.T. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; A.d.M., and metazoans (9), and analyses of their embryonic transcrip- A.S.-P., M.S.S., M.M., T.D.-L., and I.R.-T. analyzed data; and A.d.M., A.S.-P., T.D.-L., and I.R.-T. tional profiles support the presence of a phylotypic stage in both wrote the paper. fl lineages (10–14). These studies have also shown that evolution- The authors declare no con ict of interest. arily younger genes tend to be expressed at earlier and later This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. stages of development, whereas the transcriptomes of the middle Data deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited with the National Center for Biotechnology Information [NCBI BioProject number PRJNA189477 stages (the phylotypic stage) are dominated by ancient genes (10, (Amoebididum parasiticum); and NCBI SRA projects SRX096927 and SRX096925 (Ministeria 13). It remains to be investigated how the evolutionary age and vibrans); SRX377507 (Pirum gemmata); SRX377508 (Abeoforma whisleri); and SRX377514 the expression patterns of the different TFs shift throughout the (Creolimax fragrantissima)]. ontogeny of these lineages and whether TF expression profiles 1A.d.M. and A.S.-P. contributed equally to this work. correlate with the general transcriptome profiles. 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. Previous studies have analyzed the evolutionary history and This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. phylogenetic distribution of TFs in various branches of the tree 1073/pnas.1311818110/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1311818110 PNAS Early Edition | 1of9 Downloaded by guest on October 1, 2021 Downloaded by guest on October 1, 2021 survey the presence, abundance,of and TF relative (8, contribution 16).(DBDs) Therefore, of are univocal we each signatures analyzed of DBDs the across presence of eukaryotes a to particular type Lineage-Speci Results 2of9 eages are indicated ( (rows) are clustered accordingFig. to 1. abundance and distribution, and species (columns) are grouped according to phylogenetic af | Presence and abundance of transcription factors (TFs) in eukaryotes. The heat map depicts absolute TF counts according to the color scale. TFs/DBDs www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1311818110 100 200 300 0 0 5 10 15 20 histogram Color key& Archaeplastida fi c and Paneukaryotic TFs. Unikonta/Amorphea Paneukaryotic cluster Top cluster Embryophyta Metazoa cluster ). Raw data are in Fungi cluster Holozoa cluster cluster cluster Homo sapiens Danio rerio Ciona intestinalis Saccoglossus kowalevskii Drosophila melanogaster Metazoa Caenorhabditis elegans Holozoa Capitella teleta Dataset S1 Lottia gigantea Nematostella vectensis Acropora digitifera Hydr a magnipapillata DNA-binding domains Tr ichoplax adhaerens Mnemiopsis leidyi Oscarella carmela Amphimedon queenslandica Opisthokonta . Further taxonomic information is in Monosiga brevicollis Salpingoeca rosetta Capsaspora owczarzaki Ministeria vibrans Sphaeroforma arctica Creolimax fragrantissima Abeofor ma whisleri Pir um gemmata Amoebidium parasiticum Corallochytrium limacisporum Saccharomyces cerevisiae Neurospora crassa Tuber melanosporum Schizosaccharomyces pombe Cryptococcus neoformans Coprinus cinereus Holomycota Ustilago maydis Fungi Mortierella verticillata Phycomyces blakesleeanus Mucor circinelloides Rhizopus oryzae Allomyces macrogynus largest possible diversity, especially aroundods multicellular transitions. to underestimate total counts,1). but It should minimizes be false noted positives thatTF we ( class used a (71 conservative in method that total) tends throughout various eukaryotic lineages (Fig. Batrachochytr ium dendrobatidis Spizellomyces punctatus ). We used a wide taxon sampling strategy optimized to have the Encephalitozoon cuniculi Apusozoa Nematocida parisii Nuclearia sp Thecamonas trahens Dicty ostelium discoideum Polysphondylium pallidum Entamoeba histolytica Amoebozoa Dataset S2 Acanthamoeba castellanii Embryophyta Arabidopsis thaliana Archaeplastida Oryza sativa Selaginella moellendorffii Physcomitrella patens Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Volvox
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Multigene Eukaryote Phylogeny Reveals the Likely Protozoan Ancestors of Opis- Thokonts (Animals, Fungi, Choanozoans) and Amoebozoa
    Accepted Manuscript Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opis- thokonts (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa Thomas Cavalier-Smith, Ema E. Chao, Elizabeth A. Snell, Cédric Berney, Anna Maria Fiore-Donno, Rhodri Lewis PII: S1055-7903(14)00279-6 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.08.012 Reference: YMPEV 4996 To appear in: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Received Date: 24 January 2014 Revised Date: 2 August 2014 Accepted Date: 11 August 2014 Please cite this article as: Cavalier-Smith, T., Chao, E.E., Snell, E.A., Berney, C., Fiore-Donno, A.M., Lewis, R., Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opisthokonts (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (2014), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ympev.2014.08.012 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. 1 1 Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opisthokonts 2 (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa 3 4 Thomas Cavalier-Smith1, Ema E. Chao1, Elizabeth A. Snell1, Cédric Berney1,2, Anna Maria 5 Fiore-Donno1,3, and Rhodri Lewis1 6 7 1Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of Pinus Pinaster Snrks Reveals Clues of the Evolution of This Family and a New Set of Abiotic Stress Resistance Biomarkers
    agronomy Article The Analysis of Pinus pinaster SnRKs Reveals Clues of the Evolution of This Family and a New Set of Abiotic Stress Resistance Biomarkers Francisco Javier Colina * , María Carbó , Ana Álvarez , Luis Valledor * and María Jesús Cañal Plant Physiology, Department of Organisms and Systems Biology and University Institute of Biotechnology (IUBA), University of Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain; [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (A.Á.); [email protected] (M.J.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (F.J.C.); [email protected] (L.V.) Received: 15 January 2020; Accepted: 17 February 2020; Published: 19 February 2020 Abstract: Climate change is increasing the intensity and incidence of environmental stressors, reducing the biomass yields of forestry species as Pinus pinaster. Selection of new stress-tolerant varieties is thus required. Many genes related to plant stress signaling pathways have proven useful for this purpose with sucrose non-fermenting related kinases (SnRK), conserved across plant evolution and connected to different phosphorylation cascades within ABA- and Ca2+-mediated signaling pathways, as a good example. The modulation of SnRKs and/or the selection of specific SnRK alleles have proven successful strategies to increase plant stress resistance. Despite this, SnRKs have been barely studied in gymnosperms. In this work P. pinaster SnRK sequences (PpiSnRK) were identified through a homology- and domain-based sequence analysis using Arabidopsis SnRK sequences as query. Moreover, PpiSnRKs links to the gymnosperm stress response were modeled out of the known interactions of PpiSnRKs orthologs from other species with different signaling complexity. This approach successfully identified the pine SnRK family and predicted their central role into the gymnosperm stress response, linking them to ABA, Ca2+, sugar/energy and possibly ethylene signaling.
    [Show full text]
  • Stages of Embryonic Development of the Zebrafish
    DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS 2032553’10 (1995) Stages of Embryonic Development of the Zebrafish CHARLES B. KIMMEL, WILLIAM W. BALLARD, SETH R. KIMMEL, BONNIE ULLMANN, AND THOMAS F. SCHILLING Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1254 (C.B.K., S.R.K., B.U., T.F.S.); Department of Biology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 (W.W.B.) ABSTRACT We describe a series of stages for Segmentation Period (10-24 h) 274 development of the embryo of the zebrafish, Danio (Brachydanio) rerio. We define seven broad peri- Pharyngula Period (24-48 h) 285 ods of embryogenesis-the zygote, cleavage, blas- Hatching Period (48-72 h) 298 tula, gastrula, segmentation, pharyngula, and hatching periods. These divisions highlight the Early Larval Period 303 changing spectrum of major developmental pro- Acknowledgments 303 cesses that occur during the first 3 days after fer- tilization, and we review some of what is known Glossary 303 about morphogenesis and other significant events that occur during each of the periods. Stages sub- References 309 divide the periods. Stages are named, not num- INTRODUCTION bered as in most other series, providing for flexi- A staging series is a tool that provides accuracy in bility and continued evolution of the staging series developmental studies. This is because different em- as we learn more about development in this spe- bryos, even together within a single clutch, develop at cies. The stages, and their names, are based on slightly different rates. We have seen asynchrony ap- morphological features, generally readily identi- pearing in the development of zebrafish, Danio fied by examination of the live embryo with the (Brachydanio) rerio, embryos fertilized simultaneously dissecting stereomicroscope.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of Alternation of Generations in Land Plants
    Theoriginof alternation of generations inlandplants: afocuson matrotrophy andhexose transport Linda K.E.Graham and LeeW .Wilcox Department of Botany,University of Wisconsin, 430Lincoln Drive, Madison,WI 53706, USA (lkgraham@facsta¡.wisc .edu ) Alifehistory involving alternation of two developmentally associated, multicellular generations (sporophyteand gametophyte) is anautapomorphy of embryophytes (bryophytes + vascularplants) . Microfossil dataindicate that Mid ^Late Ordovicianland plants possessed such alifecycle, and that the originof alternationof generationspreceded this date.Molecular phylogenetic data unambiguously relate charophyceangreen algae to the ancestryof monophyletic embryophytes, and identify bryophytes as early-divergentland plants. Comparison of reproduction in charophyceans and bryophytes suggests that the followingstages occurredduring evolutionary origin of embryophytic alternation of generations: (i) originof oogamy;(ii) retention ofeggsand zygotes on the parentalthallus; (iii) originof matrotrophy (regulatedtransfer ofnutritional and morphogenetic solutes fromparental cells tothe nextgeneration); (iv)origin of a multicellularsporophyte generation ;and(v) origin of non-£ agellate, walled spores. Oogamy,egg/zygoteretention andmatrotrophy characterize at least some moderncharophyceans, and arepostulated to represent pre-adaptativefeatures inherited byembryophytes from ancestral charophyceans.Matrotrophy is hypothesizedto have preceded originof the multicellularsporophytes of plants,and to represent acritical innovation.Molecular
    [Show full text]
  • The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231610049 The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes Article in Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · September 2012 DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 961 2,825 25 authors, including: Sina M Adl Alastair Simpson University of Saskatchewan Dalhousie University 118 PUBLICATIONS 8,522 CITATIONS 264 PUBLICATIONS 10,739 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Christopher E Lane David Bass University of Rhode Island Natural History Museum, London 82 PUBLICATIONS 6,233 CITATIONS 464 PUBLICATIONS 7,765 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Biodiversity and ecology of soil taste amoeba View project Predator control of diversity View project All content following this page was uploaded by Smirnov Alexey on 25 October 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The Journal of Published by the International Society of Eukaryotic Microbiology Protistologists J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 59(5), 2012 pp. 429–493 © 2012 The Author(s) Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology © 2012 International Society of Protistologists DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes SINA M. ADL,a,b ALASTAIR G. B. SIMPSON,b CHRISTOPHER E. LANE,c JULIUS LUKESˇ,d DAVID BASS,e SAMUEL S. BOWSER,f MATTHEW W. BROWN,g FABIEN BURKI,h MICAH DUNTHORN,i VLADIMIR HAMPL,j AARON HEISS,b MONA HOPPENRATH,k ENRIQUE LARA,l LINE LE GALL,m DENIS H. LYNN,n,1 HILARY MCMANUS,o EDWARD A. D.
    [Show full text]
  • S41467-021-25308-W.Pdf
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25308-w OPEN Phylogenomics of a new fungal phylum reveals multiple waves of reductive evolution across Holomycota ✉ ✉ Luis Javier Galindo 1 , Purificación López-García 1, Guifré Torruella1, Sergey Karpov2,3 & David Moreira 1 Compared to multicellular fungi and unicellular yeasts, unicellular fungi with free-living fla- gellated stages (zoospores) remain poorly known and their phylogenetic position is often 1234567890():,; unresolved. Recently, rRNA gene phylogenetic analyses of two atypical parasitic fungi with amoeboid zoospores and long kinetosomes, the sanchytrids Amoeboradix gromovi and San- chytrium tribonematis, showed that they formed a monophyletic group without close affinity with known fungal clades. Here, we sequence single-cell genomes for both species to assess their phylogenetic position and evolution. Phylogenomic analyses using different protein datasets and a comprehensive taxon sampling result in an almost fully-resolved fungal tree, with Chytridiomycota as sister to all other fungi, and sanchytrids forming a well-supported, fast-evolving clade sister to Blastocladiomycota. Comparative genomic analyses across fungi and their allies (Holomycota) reveal an atypically reduced metabolic repertoire for sanchy- trids. We infer three main independent flagellum losses from the distribution of over 60 flagellum-specific proteins across Holomycota. Based on sanchytrids’ phylogenetic position and unique traits, we propose the designation of a novel phylum, Sanchytriomycota. In addition, our results indicate that most of the hyphal morphogenesis gene repertoire of multicellular fungi had already evolved in early holomycotan lineages. 1 Ecologie Systématique Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, Orsay, France. 2 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. ✉ Petersburg, Russia. 3 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Group of Microorganisms at the Animal-Fungal Boundary
    16 Aug 2002 13:56 AR AR168-MI56-14.tex AR168-MI56-14.SGM LaTeX2e(2002/01/18) P1: GJC 10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160950 Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2002. 56:315–44 doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160950 First published online as a Review in Advance on May 7, 2002 THE CLASS MESOMYCETOZOEA: A Heterogeneous Group of Microorganisms at the Animal-Fungal Boundary Leonel Mendoza,1 John W. Taylor,2 and Libero Ajello3 1Medical Technology Program, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing Michigan, 48824-1030; e-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3102; e-mail: [email protected] 3Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mycotic Diseases Branch, Atlanta Georgia 30333; e-mail: [email protected] Key Words Protista, Protozoa, Neomonada, DRIP, Ichthyosporea ■ Abstract When the enigmatic fish pathogen, the rosette agent, was first found to be closely related to the choanoflagellates, no one anticipated finding a new group of organisms. Subsequently, a new group of microorganisms at the boundary between an- imals and fungi was reported. Several microbes with similar phylogenetic backgrounds were soon added to the group. Interestingly, these microbes had been considered to be fungi or protists. This novel phylogenetic group has been referred to as the DRIP clade (an acronym of the original members: Dermocystidium, rosette agent, Ichthyophonus, and Psorospermium), as the class Ichthyosporea, and more recently as the class Mesomycetozoea. Two orders have been described in the mesomycetozoeans: the Der- mocystida and the Ichthyophonida. So far, all members in the order Dermocystida have been pathogens either of fish (Dermocystidium spp.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of Basidiolum Fimbriatum Since 1861, with Comments on Its
    Mycol. Res. 107 (2): 245–250 (February 2003). f The British Mycological Society 245 DOI: 10.1017/S0953756203007287 Printed in the United Kingdom. First report of Basidiolum fimbriatum since 1861, with comments on its development, occurrence, distribution and relationship with other fungi Merlin M. WHITE Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66045-2106, USA. E-mail : [email protected] Received 1 October 2002; accepted 19 December 2002. An obscure parasitic fungus, Basidiolum fimbriatum, was found on Amoebidium parasiticum (Amoebidiales) associated with Caenis sp. (mayfly) nymphs, during a survey of gut fungi (Trichomycetes) from a small stream in northeastern Kansas, USA. The hindguts of the nymphs harboured a species of Legeriomycetaceae and Paramoebidium sp. This is the first report of the ectocommensal protozoan, A. parasiticum, associated with the gills of Caenidae (Ephemeroptera), and of B. fimbriatum in the 142 years since its original documentation from Wiesbaden, Germany. B. fimbriatum is recorded from two midwestern USA states (Kansas and Iowa) and the morphological and developmental features of the parasite on its host are compared with Cienkowski’s original observations and interpretation. B. fimbriatum is characterized as a parasitic fungus possessing merosporangia that form on a simple pyriform thallus that penetrates and consumes its host via a haustorial network. The hypothesis that B. fimbriatum is most closely related to members of the order Zoopagales sensu Benjamin (1979) is proposed. The importance of future collections and molecular-based phylogenetic approaches to place this parasitic fungus within a current system of classification are highlighted. INTRODUCTION (Zygomycota), more commonly known as gut fungi (Lichtwardt 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Transcriptomic Insights Into the Vertebrate Phylotypic Stage
    RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology (CDB) 2‐2‐3 Minatojima minamimachi, Chuo‐ku, Kobe 650‐0047, Japan Transcriptomic insights into the vertebrate phylotypic stage April 10, 2011 – The concept of the phylotypic stage traces its roots back to early comparative observations of embryos from different vertebrate taxa, in which it was noted that embryonic morphologies appeared to converge on a shared body plan before veering off in specialized directions. This gave rise to a profound debate over the evolutionary basis for this phenomenon; specifically, whether it could best be explained by a “funnel” model, in which the commonality of traits is highest at the earliest stages of embryogenesis, and gradually but unilaterally narrows over time, or an “hourglass” model, where homology is highest at a point later in development as the body plan is being established, and differs more widely before and after. Funnel (left) and hourglass (right) models of changes in commonality and diversity in vertebrate ontogeny. A new comparative transcriptomic analysis of four vertebrate species conducted by Naoki Irie in the Laboratory for Evolutionary Morphology (Shigeru Kuratani, Group Director) has now revealed that genetic expression is most highly conserved across taxa at the pharyngula stage of development. Published in Nature Communications, these latest findings strongly suggest that the hourglass model is the more accurate description of how the vertebrate phylotype manifests. Irie decision to study this question using a gene expression approach broke with the long history of morphological comparisons. He sampled tissue from mouse, chicken, and frog embryos across multiple developmental stages to allow for comparisons of changes in gene expression, and further supplemented this data set with information from previously published transcriptomic studies in a fourth taxa, zebrafish, thus providing representative samples from mammal, bird, amphibian and fish species.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Wall Chemistry, Morphogenesis, and Taxonomy of Fungi
    Annual Reviews www.annualreviews.org/aronline Copyright 1968. All rights reserved CELL WALL CHEMISTRY, MORPHOGENESIS, 1504 AND1 TAXONOMY OF FUNGI BY S. BARTNICKI-GARClA Deparlment of Plan~ Pathology, University of California, Riverside, California CONTENTS GENERAL STRUCTURE............................................ 88 Protein .......................................... ................. 88 Lipid ............................................................ 88 Polysaccharlde ..................................................... 89 Analytical techniques ............................................... 89 CELL WALL CHEMISTRY AND TAXONOMY....................... 90 GROUt, L CELL~-LOsE-GLYCOGEI~...................................... 92 GRouP II. CELLULOsE-GLucAN........................................ 93 GROUPIII. CELLULOsE-CtIITIN ....................................... 94 GROUPIV. CHITOSAN-CH1TIN......................................... 94 GROUPV. CHITIN-GL~JCAN........................................... 95 GROUPVI. MANNAN-GLucAN......................................... 98 GROUFVII. MANNAN-CH1TIN......................................... 98 GROUPVIII. POLYOALAETOSAMINE-GALACTAN........................... 99 CELL WALL STRUCTURE AND MORPHOGENESIS ................. 99 CHEMICALDIFFERENTIATION OF THE CELL WALL....................... 99 Ve~etatlve development .............................................. 99 Germination and sporogenesis ........................................ 101 CELL WALLSPLITTING ENZTMES...................................... 101
    [Show full text]
  • Constrained Vertebrate Evolution by Pleiotropic Genes
    ARTICLES DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0318-0 Constrained vertebrate evolution by pleiotropic genes Haiyang Hu 1,2, Masahiro Uesaka3, Song Guo1, Kotaro Shimai4, Tsai-Ming Lu 5, Fang Li6, Satoko Fujimoto7, Masato Ishikawa8, Shiping Liu6, Yohei Sasagawa9, Guojie Zhang6,10, Shigeru Kuratani7, Jr-Kai Yu 5, Takehiro G. Kusakabe 4, Philipp Khaitovich1, Naoki Irie 3,11* and the EXPANDE Consortium Despite morphological diversification of chordates over 550 million years of evolution, their shared basic anatomical pattern (or ‘bodyplan’) remains conserved by unknown mechanisms. The developmental hourglass model attributes this to phylum- wide conserved, constrained organogenesis stages that pattern the bodyplan (the phylotype hypothesis); however, there has been no quantitative testing of this idea with a phylum-wide comparison of species. Here, based on data from early-to-late embryonic transcriptomes collected from eight chordates, we suggest that the phylotype hypothesis would be better applied to vertebrates than chordates. Furthermore, we found that vertebrates’ conserved mid-embryonic developmental programmes are intensively recruited to other developmental processes, and the degree of the recruitment positively correlates with their evolutionary conservation and essentiality for normal development. Thus, we propose that the intensively recruited genetic system during vertebrates’ organogenesis period imposed constraints on its diversification through pleiotropic constraints, which ultimately led to the common anatomical pattern observed in vertebrates. ver the past 550 million years, the basic anatomical features comparisons of species to confirm that the most transcriptomi- (or ‘bodyplan’) of animals at the phylum level have been con- cally conserved mid-embryonic period actually accounts for phy- Oserved1,2. However, potential mechanisms underlying this lotype or bodyplan-defining stages.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Biological Sciences Faculty Publications Biological Sciences 9-26-2018 Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes Christopher E. Lane Et Al Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/bio_facpubs Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology ISSN 1066-5234 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes Sina M. Adla,* , David Bassb,c , Christopher E. Laned, Julius Lukese,f , Conrad L. Schochg, Alexey Smirnovh, Sabine Agathai, Cedric Berneyj , Matthew W. Brownk,l, Fabien Burkim,PacoCardenas n , Ivan Cepi cka o, Lyudmila Chistyakovap, Javier del Campoq, Micah Dunthornr,s , Bente Edvardsent , Yana Eglitu, Laure Guillouv, Vladimır Hamplw, Aaron A. Heissx, Mona Hoppenrathy, Timothy Y. Jamesz, Anna Karn- kowskaaa, Sergey Karpovh,ab, Eunsoo Kimx, Martin Koliskoe, Alexander Kudryavtsevh,ab, Daniel J.G. Lahrac, Enrique Laraad,ae , Line Le Gallaf , Denis H. Lynnag,ah , David G. Mannai,aj, Ramon Massanaq, Edward A.D. Mitchellad,ak , Christine Morrowal, Jong Soo Parkam , Jan W. Pawlowskian, Martha J. Powellao, Daniel J. Richterap, Sonja Rueckertaq, Lora Shadwickar, Satoshi Shimanoas, Frederick W. Spiegelar, Guifre Torruellaat , Noha Youssefau, Vasily Zlatogurskyh,av & Qianqian Zhangaw a Department of Soil Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, S7N 5A8, SK, Canada b Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, United Kingdom
    [Show full text]