DOCSLIB.ORG

The New Port and Cockburn Sound Are You One of Those People Who Still Thinks That for Fi Sh Attraction? Just a Thought

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The New Port and Cockburn Sound Are You One of Those People Who Still Thinks That for Fi Sh Attraction? Just a Thought 2019 OCTOBER Chris Oughton, Director KIC The new port and Cockburn Sound Are you one of those people who still thinks that for fi sh attraction? Just a thought. moving the freight from Fremantle to a new port Mount Brown and the Beeliar Regional Park will alongside the Kwinana Industrial Area will have be damaged. The preferred Westport option is a devastating effect on Cockburn Sound? I don’t located south of Alcoa. The Regional Park is to the believe it will, and here’s why. north. The main freight road to service the land- Westport has said that the land-backed backed option will be Anketell Road. The Park will confi guration for the new port is currently ranked be just fi ne. fi rst out of all of the options. It’s located against The public beach and horse beach will be the shore south of Alcoa and north of the BP destroyed. Barter Beach is where the land-backed Kwinana Refi nery. port would be located. It is not a public beach, nor You can fi nd the assessment of the options at this is a formally recognised horse beach. There are website, and look for ‘Beacon # 7’. https://www. public beaches to the north and south, and you mysaytransport.wa.gov.au/westportbeacon can sometimes see horses in the water on beaches There are people saying that the shipping will near the grain terminal. There are options. destroy the environmental values of the Sound, Public beaches will go. KIC’s view is that there that the seagrass meadows will be devastated, that shouldn’t actually be any public beaches in the dolphins and penguins will starve, and that the industrial area because it’s about public safety. pink snapper fi shing and spawning grounds will Having said that, Wells Park and Challenger Beach be ruined. They say that the recreational uses of are the (only) two public beaches, and the new the Sound will be harmed, like fi shing and sailing, port wouldn’t affect them. and that land-side environmental values of the If the new port can be built so that it delivers net Beeliar Regional Park will be harmed. That’s a environmental, social, and recreational benefi ts pretty bleak picture they’re painting, and they are to Cockburn Sound, and there’s no reason why it wrong. Let’s take a look at why. can’t, why wouldn’t it be built sooner rather than They say the sea grass meadows in the Sound later? will be devastated. Wow! That’s a lot of seagrass If it has all sorts of spin-off benefi ts for the meadow to lose. Meadows are found from The ships will forever change the use of the the Sound have to stay in the channels, and they international competitiveness of the State’s Mangles Bay to Woodman Point and all the Sound. Really? Do they think Cockburn Sound move quite slowly. Realistically, it’s the jet skis Premier Industrial Area (which translates into more way out to the tip of Garden Island. Claiming is not already a busy freight port? We’ve all seen and speed boats that zoom around that injure the local jobs), why wouldn’t it be built sooner rather ‘devastation’ is a massive over reach. Apart from the ships out in the deep water moored up waiting Little Penguins. That’s what the evidence says is than later? widening the existing channel located to the north for their berthing slot. Fact: There are about the happening. west of Woodman Point, and maybe duplicating The new port in Kwinana is not a new idea, in same number of freight ships using the industrial Recreational uses will be badly affected. The it, what seagrass needs to be removed? If the new fact has been planned by governments and jetties in the Sound as there are using the docks channels already exist and the ships stick to them. port is an island out in Cockburn Sound, that will departments for well over 20 years. in Fremantle. Kwinana is already an active port The yachties already know how to navigate the cover seagrass, but if it is the land-backed option The new port in Kwinana has always been, for shipping, so rather than being new shipping, it channels and the ships. No issue there to be seen. it won’t, because there’s no seagrass against the and is, an inevitability. Once the McGowan would just be more of the same. coast. Industry prefers land backed options over The fi shing and spawning grounds will be Government makes its decision on port locations island options for all sorts of sensible reasons. Penguins and dolphins will be physically harmed destroyed. Remember, the Sound is already a busy and confi gurations early next year, let’s just get on Anyway, why can’t the project scope be widened and their food sources affected. Not sure how this port, and snapper fi sh stocks seem to be the best with doing it, and let’s make sure it is done really, to include seagrass replanting in suitable areas? I works. Penguin and dolphin food is found mainly they have been for years, don’t they? Perhaps the really well, and that the Sound is environmentally don’t see why not. where the seagrass is. The ships already using new port project could design in some new reefs better off. It can be done!. Tianqi Lithium focuses on the local community to resource the world’s largest lithium hydroxide processing plant The WA mining sector is enjoying a renewed “We’ve employed really high-quality people local community and including opportunities club were important to the company and surge in activity with lithium mining and with strong relevant, industry experience and for staff involvement, along with progressive helped underpin an inclusive and positive downstream value-adding projects making a we have found that there are many people employment conditions and an active social company culture. signifi cant contribution to this momentum. from the surrounding area who are looking for Tianqi Lithium, which is building the world’s jobs in a relatively new industry and who see Lithium hydroxide plant at sunrise, largest lithium hydroxide plant in Kwinana, is the obvious advantages of living and working Kwinana Industrial Area, Western Australia leading the lithium charge in WA. locally.” The company’s Kwinana facility has been A recent analysis of Tianqi staff by postcode developed in response to growing international revealed that 66% of all staff working at the demand for rechargeable batteries driven plant lived within 30 minutes of the Kwinana primarily by the electric vehicle and energy site with signifi cant numbers drawn from storage system industries. surrounding suburbs such as Rockingham, Safety Bay, Baldivis and Beeliar. Tianqi Lithium general manager, Phil Thick, said he anticipated that Tianqi would employ As well as having a strong focus on drawing 200 permanent full-time staff at the Kwinana workers from the Kwinana region, Mr Thick plant once it was fully operational. said the company was proactive in employing women and those from culturally diverse “We have certainly not had huge diffi culties backgrounds with women currently accounting in fi lling the positions that we have for 35% of the Tianqi workforce. advertised so far,” Mr Thick said. He said the company’s strong commitment to its Corporate Social Responsibility Program, focused on investing in and working with the #19STG.3985257-1.30.10 KIC ASSOCIATE MEMBERS Air Liquide WA Pty Ltd | Bayer Crop Science Pty Ltd | BMT Mercury Technology | BOC Ltd | Crushing Services International | DBP (WA) EcoLab Pty Ltd | Freo Group| Kwinana Cogen - Engie | Kwinana Windo Co | Lanskey Construction | Macrofertil | NewGen Power | Nufarm Australia | Perth Energy | Programmed Skilled Workforce Solenis Australia | Sims Metal Management | Summit Fertilisers | Toxfree Kwinana .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seiching in Cockburn Sound
    Seiching in Cockburn Sound by Emma Molloy Department of Environmental Engineering University of Western Australia November, 2001 Abstract A seiche is the oscillating response of an enclosed or semi-enclosed water body to external forcing, in order to return the system to equilibrium. The disturbances that cause seiches can be a variety of atmospheric and water-based mechanisms, including wind, air pressure, waves and tsunamis. In semi-enclosed micro-tidal water bodies such as Cockburn Sound, the prime mechanisms driving seiches are changes in wind speed and direction (Luettich et al, 2000). Cockburn Sound is a north-south oriented oval-shaped harbour system located 35 km south of Perth, Western Australia. It is enclosed on all sides by land, with a large opening on the north-east side. This opening facilitates water exchange to the north of Cockburn Sound. However, to the west there are reefs restricting flow. Therefore, the seiches oscillate between Mangles Bay in the south of Cockburn Sound and Fremantle. This is considered to be a semi-enclosed (“open”) system. Cockburn Sound houses a large variety of industry, as well as marine and bird life, and is used by the public for recreation. The seiches in Cockburn Sound have an impact on all of these areas. The primary effect of seiches is in influencing the mixing and flushing of the system, especially of contaminants released by the industries. Water level data were collected from Mangles Bay at the southern end of Cockburn Sound during May 2001. Water level data were also available from previous studies in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Related Structures on the Coast of Western Australia
    Port Related Structures on the Coast of Western Australia By: D.A. Cumming, D. Garratt, M. McCarthy, A. WoICe With <.:unlribuliuns from Albany Seniur High Schoul. M. Anderson. R. Howard. C.A. Miller and P. Worsley Octobel' 1995 @WAUUSEUM Report: Department of Matitime Archaeology, Westem Australian Maritime Museum. No, 98. Cover pholograph: A view of Halllelin Bay in iL~ heyday as a limber porl. (W A Marilime Museum) This study is dedicated to the memory of Denis Arthur Cuml11ing 1923-1995 This project was funded under the National Estate Program, a Commonwealth-financed grants scheme administered by the Australian HeriL:'lge Commission (Federal Government) and the Heritage Council of Western Australia. (State Govenlluent). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Heritage Council of Western Australia Mr lan Baxter (Director) Mr Geny MacGill Ms Jenni Williams Ms Sharon McKerrow Dr Lenore Layman The Institution of Engineers, Australia Mr Max Anderson Mr Richard Hartley Mr Bmce James Mr Tony Moulds Mrs Dorothy Austen-Smith The State Archive of Westem Australia Mr David Whitford The Esperance Bay HistOIical Society Mrs Olive Tamlin Mr Merv Andre Mr Peter Anderson of Esperance Mr Peter Hudson of Esperance The Augusta HistOIical Society Mr Steve Mm'shall of Augusta The Busselton HistOlical Societv Mrs Elizabeth Nelson Mr Alfred Reynolds of Dunsborough Mr Philip Overton of Busselton Mr Rupert Genitsen The Bunbury Timber Jetty Preservation Society inc. Mrs B. Manea The Bunbury HistOlical Society The Rockingham Historical Society The Geraldton Historical Society Mrs J Trautman Mrs D Benzie Mrs Glenis Thomas Mr Peter W orsley of Gerald ton The Onslow Goods Shed Museum Mr lan Blair Mr Les Butcher Ms Gaye Nay ton The Roebourne Historical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Cockburn Sound's World War II Anti
    1 Contents Acknowledgements Introduction Project aims and methodology Historical background Construction of the World War II Cockburn Sound naval base and boom defences Demolition and salvage Dolphin No.60 2010 site inspections Conclusions Significance Statement of cultural significance Legal protection Recommendations References Appendix 1 – GPS Positions 2 Acknowledgements Thanks to Jeremy Green, Department of Maritime Archaeology for geo- referencing the Public Works Department plans. Thanks to Joel Gilman and Kelly Fleming at the Heritage Council of Western Australia for assistance with legal aspects of the protection of the Dolphin No.60 site. Thanks to Mr Earle Seubert, Historian and Secretary, Friends of Woodman Point for providing valuable information regarding the history and demolition of the boom net and Woodman Point sites. Also to Mr Gary Marsh (Friends of Woodman Point) and Mr Matthew Hayes (Operations Manager, Woodman Point Recreation Camp). Matt Carter thanks the Our World Underwater Scholarship Society (OWUSS) and Rolex for enabling him to assist the WA Museum with this project. Thanks to Marie-Amande Coignard for assistance with the diving inspections. Thanks to Timothy Wilson for the cover design. Cover images Public Works Department Plan 29706 Drawing No.7 Dolphin No.60 (National Archives of Australia) Diver inspecting Dolphin No.60 site (Patrick Baker/ WA Museum) Type ‘A’ anti-boat hurdles (Australian War Memorial) 3 Introduction The Cockburn Sound anti-submarine boom defences were a major engineering project undertaken during World War II to protect the approaches to Cockburn Sound, and the northern boom defences spanned 9.37 km of seabed. In 1964 the timber pylons and dolphins were demolished with explosives and the steel nets were cut and dropped onto the seabed (Jeffery 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Background Report Page I
    Cockburn Coastal Climate Change Study Brief: Background Report Page i © Coastal Zone Management Pty Ltd and Damara WA Pty Ltd All rights reserved. The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the persons consulted. Authors Ailbhe Travers Luke Dalton Matt Eliot Coastal Zone Management Pty Ltd Coastal Zone Management Pty Ltd Damara WA Pty Ltd Unit 1/237 Stirling Hwy Unit 1/237 Stirling Hwy Unit 2/19 Wotan St Claremont, 6010 Claremont 6010 Innaloo, 6019 Western Australia Western Australia Western Australia Email: [email protected] Email: Website: www.coastalmanagement.com [email protected] Email: [email protected] Coastal Zone Management Pty Ltd Unit 1/237 Stirling Hwy PO Box 236 Claremont, WA, 6010 Australia Phone: +61 (0) 8 9284 6470 Fax: +61 (0) 8 9284 6490 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.coastalmanagement.com Cockburn Coastal Climate Change Study Brief: Background Report Page ii Document Version History Date Author Version Revision notes 18/05/2010 Ailbhe Travers 01 25/05/2010 Matt Eliot 02 26/05/2010 Luke Dalton 03 27/05/2010 Luke Dalton 04 10/07/2010 Ailbhe Travers CZM FINAL 03/09/2010 Ailbhe Travers CZM FINAL FINAL Cockburn Coastal Climate Change Study Brief: Background Report Page iii Acronymns ABS - Australian Bureau of Statistics AGO - Australian Greenhouse Office AMSA - Australian Marine Sciences Association ARI - Average Recurrence Interval BoM - Bureau of Meteorology CSIRO - Australian Commonwealth
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of the Port Coogee Development Area Jeremy Green
    Survey of the Port Coogee Development Area Jeremy Green Report—Department of Maritime Archaeology Western Australian Museum, No. 213 2006 Figure . Plan showing breakwater of proposed Port Coogee development, together with positions of wreck sites and objects of interest. Introduction current positions relative to chart datum. Additionally, The Port Coogee Development involves the historical research was carried out to try and identify construction of breakwaters and dredged channels other material that was known to have been located in an area approximately 500 m offshore extending in the general area. from latitude 32.09678°S longitude 5.75927°E south to the 32.04926°S 115.67788°E (note all The project aims latitude and longitude are given in decimal degrees and in WGS984 datum); a distance of about 000 m . To locate and precisely delineate the James, Diana (see Figure ). At the north end of the development and Omeo sites; the position of two important wreck sites are known: 2. To survey the area of the Port Coogee development James(830) and (Diana878); at the south end of that will either cover the sea bed or be affected by the development the remains of the iron steamship dredging for cultural remains; and Omeo (905) are still visible (for the background 3. To establish datum points in the James and Diana history of these three vessels see Appendix ). Since the site area and on the Omeo so that changes in the development is in an important historical anchorage level of the sea bed and movements of the wrecks area, Owen Anchorage, there is a possibility that can be monitored in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Fremantle Ports Outer Harbour Project
    .' 4142 Fremantle Ports Outer Harbour Project Fremantle Ports/Department for Planning and Infrastructure Advice to the Minister for the Environment from the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) under Section 16(e) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (This is not an assessment of the Environmental Protection Authority under Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act 1986) Environmental Protection Authority Perth, Western Australia Bulletin 1230 September 2006 ISBN. 0 7307 6869 4 ISSN. 1030 - 0120 Contents Page 1. Introduction and background ...................................................................................... 1 2. The proposal ................................................................................................................... 1 3. Consultation ................................................................................................................... 4 4. Strategic Advice on Outer Harbour Project ............................................................... 5 4.1 Site Selection ....................................................................................................... 5 4.2 Current Condition of Cockbum Sound ................................................................ 5 4.3 Pressures on Cockbum Sound ............................................................................. 7 4.4 Environmental Issues Related to Port Options and Transport Infrastructure ..... 8 Terrestrial ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Documentation of Places
    REGISTER OF HERITAGE PLACES ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTATION 11. ASSESSMENT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE Cultural heritage significance means aesthetic, historic, scientific, social or spiritual value for individuals or groups within Western Australia. In determining cultural heritage significance, the Heritage Council has had regard to the factors in the Heritage Act 2018 and the indicators adopted on 14 June 2019. PRINCIPAL AUSTRALIAN HISTORIC THEME(S) • 7.7.1 Providing for the common defence • 7.7.2 Preparing to face invasion • 7.7.3 Going to war HERITAGE COUNCIL OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA THEME(S) • 501 World Wars and other wars 11(a) Importance in demonstrating the evolution or pattern of Western Australia’s history Cape Peron K Battery Complex is important as a component of Australia's coastal defence system erected in response to external threats during World War II. The Battery formed part of the chain of gun emplacements erected in the west during the war, referred to as ‘Fremantle Fortress’, stretching from between Swanbourne, Cape Peron, Leighton, Woodman Point, Fremantle, Garden Island, and Rottnest Island. Cape Peron K Battery Complex demonstrates the military importance of Cockburn Sound during World War II. Cape Peron K Battery Complex has been associated with the defence of Australia since its acquisition by the Commonwealth in 1916. 11(b) Importance in demonstrating rare, uncommon or endangered aspects of Western Australia’s heritage Cape Peron K Battery Complex demonstrates a distinctive method of coastal defence that is no longer relevant in the age of modern warfare. Although part of a chain of coastal defences established in Western Australia during WWII, the apparent lack of consistency in the design of some of these places makes each rare for its ability to reveal information about the innovation Register of Heritage Places Cape Peron K Battery Complex 3 13 October 2019 of defence personnel and their adaptation of coastal defence sites to suit local conditions and requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Application of a Three Dimensional Baroclinic Model to the Hydrodynamics and Transport of Cockburn Sound, Western Australia
    The application of a three dimensional baroclinic model to the hydrodynamics and transport of Cockburn Sound, Western Australia. A contribution to the Southern Metropolitan Coastal Waters Study 1991-1994 Department of Environmental Protection Perth, Western Australia, 6000 Technical Series 76 December 1995 .. ISBN 0 7309 8066 9 ISSN 1328-7230 The application of a three dimensional baroclinic model to the hydrodynamics and transport of Cockburn Sound, Western Australia. D. A. Mills and N. D'Adamo Department of Environmental Protection Perth, Western Australia, 6000. Contents Page Acknowledgments Abstract 1. Introduction 1 2. Description of the study area 2 3. Hydrodynamic model 6 3.1 Model requirements 6 3.2 Description of the model 7 4. Hydrodynamic modelling of Cockburn Sound 8 4.1 Aims 8 4.2 Model domain and grid 8 4.3 Model initialisation, forcing and parameterisation 9 5. Model validation 11 6. Modelling the seasonal hydrodynamic regimes of Cockburn Sound 15 6.1 Introduction 15 6.2 Modelling the 'winter spring' hydrodynamic regime of Cockburn Sound 16 6.3 Modelling the 'autumn' hydrodynamic regime of Cockburn Sound 22 6.4 Modelling the 'summer' hydrodynamic regime of Cockburn Sound 29 7. Effects of the Garden Island Causeway on the flushing of Cockburn Sound 35 7.1 Introduction 35 7.2 Past studies 35 7.3 Application of a three dimensional baroclinc model 36 7.4 Effects of the Garden Island Causeway on the 'autumn' regime 36 7.5 Effects of the Garden Island Causeway on the 'winter-spring' regime 37 8. Dispersion of effluent in Cockburn Sound 42 8.1 Introduction 42 8.2 Far-field dispersion of effluent in Cockburn Sound 43 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Cockburn Sound Management Council
    COCKBURN SOUND MANAGEMENT COUNCIL THE STATE OF COCKBURN SOUND: A PRESSURE-STATE-RESPONSE REPORT Prepared for: COCKBURN SOUND MANAGEMENT COUNCIL Prepared by: D.A. LORD & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD In association with: PPK ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE PTY LTD JUNE 2001 REPORT NO. 01/187/1 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY __________________________________________________ v 1. INTRODUCTION ________________________________________________________ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ___________________________________________________________________ 1 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY OF COCKBURN SOUND _________________________________ 2 1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT APPROACH FOR COCKBURN SOUND _______________ 5 1.4 THIS DOCUMENT _________________________________________________________________ 7 2. MARINE COMPONENT __________________________________________________ 9 2.1 REGIONAL CONTEXT _____________________________________________________________ 9 2.2 ECOSYSTEM OVERVIEW __________________________________________________________ 9 2.3 STATE OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT ___________________________________________ 10 2.3.1 Water movement in the Sound ____________________________________________________ 10 2.3.2 Coastal processes _____________________________________________________________ 18 2.3.3 Water quality _________________________________________________________________ 22 2.3.4 Marine sediments______________________________________________________________ 29 2.3.5 Marine flora__________________________________________________________________ 32 2.3.6 Marine fauna _________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Shellsand Dredging Owen Anchorage Wave Climate
    LONG-TERM SHELLSAND DREDGING OWEN ANCHORAGE WAVE CLIMATE MEASUREMENT AND MODELLING PLAN CHAPTER SEVEN OF DOCUMENT: LONG-TERM SHELLSAND DREDGING, OWEN ANCHORAGE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME JUNE 2003 p:\cockburn\projmgt\ermp\env management plans\chapter 7.doc 24/06/2003; 1:52 PM CHAPTER SEVEN OF DOCUMENT: LONG-TERM SHELLSAND DREDGING OWEN ANCHORAGE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME LONG-TERM SHELLSAND DREDGING OWEN ANCHORAGE WAVE CLIMATE MEASUREMENT AND MODELLING PLAN Prepared for: COCKBURN CEMENT LIMITED Prepared by: DAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING PTY LTD M.P. ROGERS AND ASSOCIATES PTY LTD ISBN. 1 876476 37 0 JUNE 2003 REPORT NO. 032/18 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION _____________________________________________________ 1 1.1 THIS DOCUMENT: WAVE CLIMATE MEASUREMENT AND MODELLING PLAN (WCMMP) FOR OWEN ANCHORAGE AND COCKBURN SOUND_____________________1 1.2 LONG-TERM SHELLSAND DREDGING, OWEN ANCHORAGE_______________________1 1.3 MINISTERIAL CONDITIONS: LONG-TERM SHELLSAND DREDGING, OWEN ANCHORAGE_________________________________________________________________1 1.4 IMPLEMENTATION OF WCMMP ________________________________________________2 2. WAVE CLIMATE MEASUREMENT AND MODELLING PLAN ____________ 4 2.1 BACKGROUND _______________________________________________________________4 2.1.1 Initial wave climate measurement and modelling____________________________________4 2.1.2 Use of 2GWave Model to assess effects of proposed seaway ___________________________5 2.1.3 Modified stage one dredge configuration __________________________________________5
    [Show full text]
  • OPEN REPORT ASSESSMENT of ABORIGINAL HERITAGE VALUES and TRADITIONAL USES Atlas Project - Image Resources NL September 2020 ______
    OPEN REPORT ASSESSMENT OF ABORIGINAL HERITAGE VALUES AND TRADITIONAL USES Atlas Project - Image Resources NL September 2020 __________________________________________________ ABORIGINAL HERITAGE VALUES AND TRADITIONAL USES ASSESSMENT Recognition of People & Country Horizon Heritage Management acknowledges and pays respect to the Yued ‘Noongar’ Traditional Owners and community of the land and sea of this ‘boodja’ (country). We pay respect to the Elders past, present and emerging who hold the memories, traditions, culture and hopes for the future. Horizon Heritage has chosen to use the spelling Noongar (other options; Nyoongar, Nyungah & Nyoongar) for this report. Yued refers to the Noongar dialectal group north of Perth. Confidentiality This is an open report and no information in this report is confidential or restricted. Disclaimer This assessment report is being supplied to Image Resources so it can understand the likely Aboriginal heritage values and traditional uses at its proposed Atlas Project. Image Resources has to manage its requirements and responsibilities under the WA Aboriginal Heritage Act (1972) (AHA) and be aware of and minimise risks to Aboriginal heritage and culture. Aboriginal sites, places and objects are afforded protection under the AHA. Copyright This report is the property of Horizon Heritage Management. The copyright owner has given permission to Image Resources to use the contents of the report. Acknowledgements Horizon Heritage Management acknowledges the assistance of Preston Consulting for this assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Shellsand Dredging, Owen Anchorage ______
    Long-Term Shellsand Dredging, Owen Anchorage ___________________________________________________________________________ Cockburn Cement Limited Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority Environmental Protection Authority Perth, Western Australia Bulletin 1033 November 2001 ISBN. 0 7307 6659 4 ISSN. 1030 - 0120 Assessment No.1300 Summary and recommendations Cockburn Cement Limited (CCL) has been dredging shellsand from Owen Anchorage since 1972. CCL now proposes to dredge shellsand in the long-term (to 2034) from additional specific locations on Success Bank, Parmelia Bank and West Success Bank, Owen Anchorage. The proposal comprises Stage 1 (2002-2014) on Success and Parmelia Bank and Stage 2 (2015-2034) on West Success Bank. CCL has proposed dredging a total area of 783ha which comprises 168.5ha of seagrass and 614 ha of unvegetated habitat. This report provides the Environmental Protection Authority’s (EPA’s) advice and recommendations to the Minister for the Environment and Heritage on the environmental factors relevant to the proposal. The EPA has previously undertaken assessments on CCL’s short and medium term dredging proposals. The EPA in its assessment of the medium-term proposal in Owen Anchorage recommended that proposals involving the further removal of seagrass and potential seagrass habitat in the long-term for shellsand should be recognised as ‘environmentally unreasonable’ (EPA, 1996a). The challenge for CCL, in its application for the long-term dredging proposal involving further seagrass removal, was to provide additional information which could lead the EPA to the view that the further removal of some seagrass and potential seagrass habitat was environmentally reasonable. Section 44 of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 requires the EPA to report to the Minister for the Environment and Heritage on the environmental factors relevant to the proposal and on the conditions and procedures to which the proposal should be subject, if implemented.
    [Show full text]