DOCSLIB.ORG

Evolutionpart

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evolutionpart Instant Expert | Evolution Part One EVOLUTION PART ONE Not so long ago, all species were thought to have been created by god. Then along came evolution Illustrations by Raymond Beisinger 16 July 2016 | NewScientist | 35 Instant Expert | Evolution Part One THE EVOLUTION REVOLUTION The story of how one of science’s greatest ideas came into being is both remarkable and riddled with myths. John van Wyhe lifts the lid volution is the most 19th century it was widely had been abruptly ended appreciate how radical the revolutionary concept in the understood that Earth could not by some great catastrophe. concept was initially. However, it E history of science. Nothing be a few thousand years old, but Another puzzle was the soon became almost universally else has more radically changed must be inconceivably ancient. discovery in Europe and America accepted in the scientific our understanding of the natural Earth was also found to have of gigantic fossilised animals. community, with one important world and ourselves. changed over time. Close study Where could creatures such as exception: the French naturalist The work of Charles Darwin of rocks and fossils revealed a mammoths be living today? Jean-Baptiste Lamarck. showed, irrefutably, that complex history of different Perhaps their kind had died out? For Lamarck, these unfamiliar humans are just another animal ages. One layer of the geological This couldn’t be true, according fossil forms had not gone occupying a small branch on record might show lush tropical to traditional belief, since God extinct. Instead they had a vast tree of life. No divine vegetation populated with would not allow any of his changed, evolving into spark is needed to explain reptiles unlike any alive today. created species to perish. something else – although his our existence and traits. In the rock layers just above, yet Cuvier’s detailed research in view of this process was different But how exactly did Darwin another terrestrial world might anatomy established, once and to that later proposed by Darwin devise his theory of evolution? have existed with different for all, that creatures such as the (see “The view before Darwin”, What ideas did he build on? animals and plants. To explain mammoth were not the same as below). The mammoth, for Where does the naturalist Alfred this, in 1812 the great French anything alive today, and were example, could have evolved Russel Wallace, who proposed a anatomist Georges Cuvier put extinct. For us, extinction is such into the elephant. similar theory, fit in? And how forward the idea that each age a mundane fact that we cannot As the influential Cuvier did shocking was the idea to the with so many rivals, he used his Christian society of the time? reputation to demolish Lamarck. The story of the uncovering THE VIEW The result was that for the first of this great revelation has been few decades of the 19th century, retold countless times since before darwin not only Lamarck’s theory but the publication of Darwin’s On Lamarckism is mentioned in biology textbooks as shorthand for a any theory of evolution was the Origin of Species in 1859. In pre-Darwinian theory of evolution in which species were thought to evolve considered unscientific and the process, the assumptions via the inheritance of characteristics acquired during an organism’s absurd. Although Lamarck and guesses of one generation lifetime. According to this, the giraffe got its long neck by intentionally won a few converts, many more became accepted as fact by the stretching to reach the top of trees. This slightly stretched neck was accepted Cuvier’s view that a next – with some spawning then passed on to offspring, and so on. But this version of Lamarckism succession of eras of life had widespread myths. Perhaps the is a terrible caricature. The biologist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck did not come and gone. most fundamental of these is originate this idea – which many naturalists, including Darwin, But where did the new that thinkers had been striving continued to accept –and this was not the core of his theory. Instead, species that emerged after these for centuries to solve the mystery Lamarck’s central idea was that there is a tendency for life to progress up extinctions come from? The of the origin of species. They the scale of perfection according to a “complexifying force”. New species geologist Charles Lyell argued hadn’t, and indeed they couldn’t originated continuously via spontaneous generation (the appearance in his Principles of Geology, have – just as ancient Greek of life from inorganic matter) and could adapt to local circumstances published in the early 1830s, philosophers could not have through the inheritance of acquired characteristics. that slow processes had changed been searching for dark matter. Earth over time. Lyell’s picture Traditionally, people in was one of perpetual change. Christian Europe had believed As an environment gradually that the world was about transformed, the species that 6000 years old. This view was lived in it would become unsuited guided by interpolations from to it and die out, because there the Bible, which itself gave no was a limit to how much they K C date for creation. Gradually O could change to adapt. Just how such beliefs were modified utterst new species arose was left vague. by Christian thinkers based on Lyell’s work was of great new information about Earth, interest to Charles Darwin, a gleaned from the growth of young Cambridge graduate mining and the development who was appointed to join the of geology. By the early LIBRARY/UIG/REX/SH PICTURE DEA surveying voyage of HMS Beagle 36 | NewScientist | 16 July 2016 John van Wyhe is a historian of science at the National University of Singapore. He is the founder of Darwin Online (darwin-online.org.uk/), the largest and most complete collection of Darwin’s writings, and the author of 10 books on Darwin, Wallace and evolution ROUTE TO A BREAKTHROUGH Erasmus Darwin, Charles’s grandfather, 1795 foreshadows Darwin when he writes: “Would it be too bold to imagine that all warm-blooded animals have arisen from one living filament… with the power of acquiring new parts” The doom-mongering An Essay on the Principle 1798 of Population by Thomas Malthus warns of the dire consequences of unrestricted population growth. It is a key influence on Charles Darwin O T K PHO French naturalist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck publishes C O T S 1809 Philosophie Zoologique, outlining his idea of lamy /A evolution according to a “complexifying force” useum M ry O Charles Robert Darwin is born in Shrewsbury, UK, Hist 1809 the fifth of six children in a prosperous family atural N E TH French zoologist Georges Cuvier publishes Essay on 1813 the Theory of the Earth, setting out his idea that Galapagos Islands finches: were After the return of HMS new species appear after catastrophes such as floods they key to Darwin’s ideas? Beagle in 1836, Darwin set to work describing his mountain Alfred Russel Wallace is born in the village of as a naturalist in 1831 (contrary of specimens. He also began 1823 Llanbadoc near the border of England and Wales, to popular accounts, he was asking himself deep questions the seventh of nine children not invited along to be the about nature, life and religion. captain’s social companion, Gradually, he gave up his Darwin sets sail on HMS Beagle for a survey nor was the ship’s surgeon belief in Christianity. “It is 1831 of South America. The voyage lasts five years the official naturalist). During not supported by evidence”, this five-year voyage, Darwin he concluded. Nevertheless, Darwin sketches the first “tree of life” in his matured into one of the most as far as we know, he never 1837 notebook to explain the evolutionary relationships experienced scientists of his lost a belief in a supernatural between species generation. He worked primarily creator behind nature. as a geologist but also collected Several types of evidence led Wallace departs for an expedition to Brazil. On the a wide range of living things, Darwin to accept that species 1848 return journey four years later, a fire destroys many from finches to fungi. must evolve. On his voyage down of his specimens The expedition first visited the South American continent, South America, then surveyed he observed that related species Wallace conceives of his theory of how species adapt the waters around the Galapagos gradually replaced one another. 1858 to a changing world. On 1 July both Wallace’s and Islands. Only in the middle of The species living in the Darwin’s ideas are presented at the Linnean Society the 20th century did Darwin’s Galapagos also puzzled him. of London visit there come to be portrayed Many of these were unique to the as a pivotal moment in his life. islands, yet most were strikingly Darwin’s On the Origin of Species is published He never described it as such. similar to South American 1859 and becomes the object of much ridicule and abuse And as charming as it sounds, species. But the Galapagos, a there is no truth to the story collection of marine volcanoes, Debating evolution at Oxford, Bishop Samuel that Darwin noticed the beaks had never been connected to 1860 Wilberforce asks Thomas Huxley, a champion of of the finches were adapted to South America and their climate Darwin’s ideas, if Huxley’s monkey ancestors were different diets and that this was totally different. on his grandmother’s or grandfather’s side provoked his evolutionary According to Lyell’s view, theorising. There was no species were somehow created to Evolution comes to be accepted as fact by most of Galapagos eureka moment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Darwin's Pictures: Views of Evolutionary Theory, 1837–1874
    1 3 13 16 21 24 27 30 33 37 2 Published bimonthly by the OF National Center for Science Education EPORTS THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION REPORTS.NCSE.COM R ISSN 2159-9270 FEATURE Turtles All the Way Down: The Atlas of Creation Matt Cartmill A biologist reviewing a creationist attack on evolution is in much the same position as an astronomer reviewing a book that offers to prove the earth is at. The at-earther has a hundred bad reasons for reaching the wrong conclusions, and a hundred snappy retorts to all the painstakingly researched arguments for reaching the right ones. Taking these reasons and retorts apart is a slow, unrewarding job, like writing an introductory textbook for which you get paid no royalties. But if the at-earther or anti-evolutionist has a large audience and a loyal following, it isn’t enough to say, “This book is a monstrosity,” and leave it at that. The monstrosity has to be killed. From what I hear, Adnan Oktar (pen name: Harun Yahya) and his Atlas of Creation (2007a) have a big following in Turkey—so big that a Turkish court moved to block the biologist Richard Dawkins’s website (http://richarddawkins.net/) in Turkey when Oktar complained that its contents were defamatory to him. (The offensive language was Dawkins’s descrip- tion of the Atlas as “preposterous” and “inane”.) Many Christian creationists, who look on the Qur’an and the Origin of Species (Darwin 1859) alike as works of the Devil, will be sur- prised to hear that there is a growing and well-funded Islamic opposition to Darwin.
    [Show full text]
  • Why There Was No 'Darwin's Bulldog': Thomas Henry Huxley's Famous Nickname
    THE LINNEAN VOL 35(1) APRIL 2019 Why there was no ‘Darwin’s Bulldog’: Thomas Henry Huxley’s Famous Nickname John van Wyhe FLS Department of Biological Sciences and Tembusu College, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore University Professorial Fellow, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, N.T., Australia e: [email protected] arwin’s bulldog’ is one of the most famous nicknames in the history of science. Virtually every mention of the Victorian zoologist Thomas Henry ‘DHuxley (1825–95) includes this pithy epithet. Equally ubiquitous is the claim that Huxley was known by this name during the 19th-century debates over Darwinism. Adrian Desmond’s racy 1997 biography of Huxley uses the phrase many times, but never mentions where it comes from although the back cover of the book states that Huxley was “often referred to as ‘Darwin’s Bulldog’” (Desmond 1997). In a popular history of science, historian William Bynum wrote that by 1863 Huxley “had already assumed his mantle as ‘Darwin’s bulldog’” (Bynum 2012). Figuratively speaking this is no doubt true, but most references to this famous sobriquet indicate that this is not just what Huxley was, but what he was known as. For example, the primatologist Frans de Waal noted that, during his lifetime, Huxley “had gained a reputation as ‘Darwin’s Bulldog’ owing to his fierce advocacy of evolution” (de Waal 2009: 7). Jonathan Miller wrote in his illustrated beginners guide to Charles Darwin (1809–82), “Huxley … devoted so much of his life to defending & popularizing the theory of descent with modification that he earned the name of … Darwin’s Bulldog” (Miller 1982: 4).
    [Show full text]
  • A Delicate Adjustment: Wallace and Bates on the Amazon and ‘‘The Problem of the Origin of Species’’
    Journal of the History of Biology (2014) 47:627–659 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 DOI 10.1007/s10739-014-9378-z A Delicate Adjustment: Wallace and Bates on the Amazon and ‘‘The Problem of the Origin of Species’’ JOHN VAN WYHE National University of Singapore 14 Science Drive 4 Singapore 117543 Singapore E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. For over a century it has been believed that Alfred Russel Wallace and Henry Walter Bates set out for the Amazon in 1848 with the aim of ‘‘solving the problem of the origin of species’’. Yet this enticing story is based on only one sentence. Bates claimed in the preface to his 1863 book that Wallace stated this was the aim of their expedition in an 1847 letter. Bates gave a quotation from the letter. But Wallace himself never endorsed or repeated this story. Many writers have acknowledged that this letter still survives. Yet the wording is different from that quoted by Bates and the letter says nothing of an expedition. It is argued that the sentence given by Bates is not a genuine quotation from this or any other Wallace letter but was modified by Bates to promote his own reputation. More significantly, this leads to the conclusion that there was a very sudden and dramatic shift in the way species were thought of and discussed after Darwin’s Origin of species appeared. Something called ‘‘the problem of the origin of species’’ (and similar variants) never occurred before Darwin’s book but exploded in frequency immediately after it.
    [Show full text]
  • American Philosophical Society, Cataloging Darwin's Works
    Narrative Section of a Successful Application The attached document contains the grant narrative and selected portions of a previously funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model, but to give you a sense of how a successful application may be crafted. Every successful application is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the Preservation and Access Programs application guidelines at http://www.neh.gov/grants/guidelines/HCRR.html for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Preservation and Access Programs staff well before a grant deadline. Note: The attachment only contains the grant narrative and selected portions, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: Cataloging and Contextualizing the World's Largest Known Collection of Printed Works by Charles Darwin Institution: American Philosophical Society Project Director: Martin L. Levitt Grant Program: Preservation and Access Humanities Collections and Reference Resources 1100 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Rm. 411, Washington, D.C. 20506 P 202.606.8570 F 202.606.8639 E [email protected] www.neh.gov SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PROJECT Humanities Context and Scholarly Opportunities In the history of human ideas, paradigm-shifting scientists have on occasion had a profound impact on humanistic thought. Individuals such as Copernicus, Newton, and Einstein, whose theories redefined the foundations of man’s relationship to the natural world, infused and inspired dialogue across the humanistic disciplines.
    [Show full text]