An Interpretation of Synecologic Relationships in the Billy Meadows Area of the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Interpretation of Synecologic Relationships in the Billy Meadows Area of the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Charles Grier Johnson, Jr. for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Rangeland Resources presented on October 26, 1981. Title: An Interpretation of Synecologic Relationships in the Billy Meadows Area of the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: A. H. Winward A study of the plant communities of the Billy Meadows Study Unit, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, was initiated in June, 1978. The objectives were to:(1) identify the plant communities and classify them by habitat types;(2) establish field procedures for subsequent investigation of forest and steppe vegetation over a more extensive area;(3) determine vegetative affinities to aspect and soil depth in patterned ground mounded topography. A reconnaissance survey was developed for rapid plot establishment to permit investigation of the relatively large area. The purpose of the reconnaissance was to gain a familiarity of the vegetation, charac- terize the variability of the plant communities, and establish sites for possible intensive study. Intensive investigations of selected sites were conducted following preliminaryclassification to gain more de- tailed information about the plant communities. A final classification re- sulted based on the habitat type concept using three primary computer programs (PRES, REFORM, ORDER) and discriminantanalysis. Habitat types were delineated based on similarities and differences demonstrated by vegetation composition, environmental attributes and soils data. A total of nine steppe and seven forest habitat types was differenti- ated. Two seral community types of the Abies grandis/Linnaea borealis habitat type (Abies grandis/Vaccinium membranaceum and Pinus contorta/ Vaccinium membranaceum) were studied intensively due to their extensive coverage of the study unit. The steppe habitat types ranged from shrub- land types dominated by Physocarpus and Symphoricarpos to Agropyron spica- tum and Festuca idahoensis dominated bunchgrass types. Xeric scabland types dominated by Artemisia rigida, Poa sandbergii and Eriogonum species completed the principal steppe vegetation. Physocarpus malvaceus/Symphori- carpos albus, Artemisia rigida/Agropyron spicatum and Eriogonum strictum/ Poa sandbergii habitat types were proposed as types not previously des- cribed in the literature. The forested communities were dominated by true firs (Abies,,lasiocarpa and Abies grandis) and Pseudotsuga menziesii. Pinus ponderosa communities were limited in extent. The Billy Meadows Study Unit contained a multitude of patterned ground communities in all stages of plant succession. Five community types were identified on the mound crests. Sequences of retrogressive sucesssions were defined based on comparative analyses between mounds of a singular habitat type. A sequential retrogression might be exempli- fied on Agropyron/Festuca climax vegetation to Koeleria domination to annual Bromus or Eriogonum heracleoides domination to an ultimate dis- climax of Madia glomerata under the pressure of continued grazing. Mound aprons were intensively studied to determine if plants were influenced in their distribution by either aspect or soil depth. Some species were particularly sensitive to soil depth (e.g., Collinsia parviflora) and aspect (e.g., Bromus carinatus) while others were ubiquitous (e.g., Achillea millefolium). Although annuals made up the majority of mound apron communities, it was demonstrated that a dis- tinctive pattern of occurrence could often be determined based on soil depth and aspect of mounded topography. An Interpretation of Synecologic Relationships in the Billy Meadows Area of the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest by Charles Grier Johnson, Jr. A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 1982 APPROVED: Redacted for Privacy Associate Professor, Rangeland Resources, in charge of major Redacted for Privacy Head Department, Rangeland Resources Redacted for Privacy Dean of Gradua School Date thesis is presented October 26, 1981 Typed by Ione Crandall for Charles Grier Johnson, Jr. Ecology is as much a way of looking at things as it is a body of scientific data, that in effect it is in part an art and therefore intuitive. Perhaps we would learn as much or more if we sat on a stump and just contemplated our surround- ings instead of madly measuring and recording data. P.B. Whitford Department of Botany University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Albany, Oregon 10/26/81 To My Teachers: The trail has often been rocky - blazes have not been fresh and the way lost at times. But finally the trail to a major pinnacle in life has been travelled and I look back at those who taught me how to climb to higher goals and who led me away from side trails that could have taken me off on another journey. It is to these "teachers" I address this account of my journey as I sit upon the pinnacle - for the view is extremely clear and the panorama very grand. Mom and Dad were the first teachers. A set of values was provided - a simple map was drawn of possible routes (different trails) that could be taken to reach varying summits of the mountain. Some were easy hikes, others were more difficult. I took many exploratory hikes, got lost a time or two, and gazed with awe at the untested trails leading to the pinnacle. In youth the pinnacle was too remote, too difficult - and probably not conquerable. Wes Albinson taught me a moral code and guided me over some of the early obstacles in the paths. Emma Pflugfelder saw a gleam through the forest of adolescence and suggested I pursue the opening to see if the trail was straight and in the right direction to achieve the summit. The trail led me through a strange land of mixed vegetation and into a patch of biological tangles. Fred Johnson noticed another gleam through the understory of a deep, dark forest. He offered to guide me out of the forest by show- ing me an order to what was an apparent disarray of plants and environ- ments. He provided indirect nudgings and forceful teachings to assure my attainment as a master of the forest ecological puzzle. A side trail was then taken and keen insight by Jack Krieger helped me to see how to retrace my pathways and discover the way once again. Fred Hall was encountered as the trail steepened and obstacles needed to be hurdled. He helped me clamor over these barriers and find a dim path across a grassy expanse. Then the trail steepened again and the climbing got harder. Al Winward was found at a rest stop and offered direction and counsel as to the best route over the grassy ridge to the long-awaited pinnacle. But perhaps it was not worth trying -I was tiring. The trail was so steep and so long. Angelica provided the reassurance. She packed my bag, made my lunch and gave me the time to make the final assault for the top. Audrey and Melica were understand- ing and patient. They knew, as only children know, that Daddy would be back from his journey and our games could then be played. So the final assault was made over the windy, chill steppe of the summit ridge. Bad weather often forced a cessation but never did it deter the trek. Too many good teachers had seen to that. As I recount my journey,I look down on the slope to those early beginnings. The pattern and order of the forest and nearby grasslands is so easy to see now. The route to the pinnacle can be straightened, bad trails avoided. I had many teachers help me make the climb and attain the summit. Not it is time to help others see the beauty and order of the natural world. I will leave the pinnacle to go below. There I will blaze new trails to help others see and understand the ecological puzzle - to assure people use of the resources of the mountain. It is time to be a teacher - to guide others as so many have guided me to this wonderful panorama. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Study Area 4 Location 4 Climate 8 Geology 15 Soils 16 Grazing History - Domestic Livestock 20 Grazing History - Wildlife 27 LogginvHistory 31 Fire History 32 Review of Historic Synecologic Literature Pertinent to the Intermountain Pacific Northwest and the Billy Meadows Study Unit 35 J. E. Weaver 35 Daubenmire 35 Tisdale 38 Pfister 39 F. C. Hall 40 Approach to Sampling the Wallowa-Snake Subprovince 42 Methods 43 Reconnaissance Survey 44 Intensive Survey 53 Data Analysis Programs 60 Identification of Habitat Types 62 Results and Discussion 63 Classification Sequence 63 Presence - Species Listing 64 Order - The Association Table 66 Discriminant Analysis 73 The Steppe Habitat Types of Billy Meadows StudyUnit 80 Physocarpus malvaceus/Symphoricarpos albus Habitat Type 82 Symphoricarpos albus/Poa pratensis Plant Community Type 90 Festuca idahoensis/Agropyron spicatum Habitat Type 97 Agropyron spicatum/Festuca idahoensis Habitat Type 109 Agropyron spicatum/Poa sandbergii Habitat Type- 120 Artemisia rigida/Agropyron spicatum Habitat Type 133 TABLE OF CONTENTS Continued Page Artemisia rigida/Poa sandbergii Habitat Type 138 Eriogonum douglasii7Poa sandbergii Habitat Type 149 Eriogonum strictum/Poa sandbergii Habitat Type 155 Poa sandbergii/Danthonia unispicata Habitat Type 161 Eriogonum heracleoides/Poa pratensis Plant Community Type 172 Fragmental Communities 180 Meadow 180 Juncus tenuis seepage 180 Artemisia tridentata vaseyana f. spiciformis/ Poa pratensis Plant Community Type 180 Festuca idahoensis/Symphoricarpos albus Plant Community Type 184 Canyon Slope Garland Communities 184 The Forested Habitat Types of Billy Meadows Study Unit 191 Abies lasiocarpa/Linnaea borealis Habitat Type 198 Abies grandis/Linnaea borealis Habitat Type 210 Abies grandis/Vaccinium membranaceum Plant Community Type 223 Pinus contorta/Vaccinium membranaceum Plant Community Type 232 Pseudotsuga menziesii/Calamagrostis rubescens Habitat Type 240 Pseudotsuga menziesii/Physocarpus malvaceus Habitat Type 251 Pseudotsuga menziesii/Symphoricarpos albus Habitat Type 262 Pinus ponderosa/Symphoricarpos albus Habitat Type 271 Pinus ponderosa/Festuca idahoensis Habitat Type 280 Fragmental Communities 289 Pinus ponderosa/Agropyron spicatum Plant Community Type 289 Pseudotsuga menziesii/Elymus glaucus Plant Community Type 291 Acer glabrum/Viola sp.
Recommended publications
  • Representativeness Assessment of Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho
    USDA United States Department of Representativeness Assessment of Agriculture Forest Service Research Natural Areas on Rocky Mountain Research Station National Forest System Lands General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-45 in Idaho March 2000 Steven K. Rust Abstract Rust, Steven K. 2000. Representativeness assessment of research natural areas on National Forest System lands in Idaho. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-45. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 129 p. A representativeness assessment of National Forest System (N FS) Research Natural Areas in ldaho summarizes information on the status of the natural area network and priorities for identification of new Research Natural Areas. Natural distribution and abundance of plant associations is compared to the representation of plant associations within natural areas. Natural distribution and abundance is estimated using modeled potential natural vegetation, published classification and inventory data, and Heritage plant community element occur- rence data. Minimum criteria are applied to select only viable, high quality plant association occurrences. In assigning natural area selection priorities, decision rules are applied to encompass consideration of the adequacy and viability of representation. Selected for analysis were 1,024 plant association occurrences within 21 4 natural areas (including 115 NFS Research Natural Areas). Of the 1,566 combinations of association within ecological sections, 28 percent require additional data for further analysis; 8, 40, and 12 percent, respectively, are ranked from high to low conservation priority; 13 percent are fully represented. Patterns in natural area needs vary between ecological section. The result provides an operational prioritization of Research Natural Area needs at landscape and subregional scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Indicator Species
    1 Handout 6 – Habitat Indicator Species Habitat Indicator Species The species lists below are laid out by habitats and help you to find out which habitats you are surveying – you will see that some species occur in several different habitats. Key: * Plants that are especially good indicators of that specific habitat Plants found in Norfolk’s woodland Common Name Scientific Name Alder Buckthorn Frangula alnus Aspen Populus tremula Barren Strawberry Potentilla sterilis Bird Cherry Prunus padus Black Bryony Tamus communis Bush Vetch Vicia sepium Climbing Corydalis Ceratocapnos claviculata Common Cow-wheat Melampyrum pratense Early dog violet Viola reichenbachiana Early Purple Orchid Orchis mascula * English bluebell Hyacinthoides non-scripta* * Field Maple Acer campestre* Giant Fescue Festuca gigantea * Goldilocks buttercup Ranunculus auricomus* Great Wood-rush Luzula sylvatica Greater Burnet-saxifrage Pimpinella major Greater Butterfly-orchid Platanthera chlorantha Guelder Rose Viburnum opulus Hairy Wood-rush Luzula pilosa Hairy-brome Bromopsis ramosa Hard Fern Blechnum spicant Hard Shield-fern Polystichum aculeatum * Hart's-tongue Phyllitis scolopendrium* Holly Ilex aquifolium * Hornbeam Carpinus betulus* * Midland Hawthorn Crataegus laevigata* Moschatel Adoxa moschatellina Narrow Buckler-fern Dryopteris carthusiana Opposite-leaved Golden-saxifrage Chrysosplenium oppositifolium * Pendulous Sedge Carex Pendula* Pignut Conopodium majus Polypody (all species) Polypodium vulgare (sensulato) * Primrose Primula vulgaris* 2 Handout 6 – Habitat
    [Show full text]
  • Epilobium Hirsutum L. (Onagraceae): a New Distributional Report for Northern Haryana, India
    Journal on New Biological Reports ISSN 2319 – 1104 (Online) JNBR 5(3) 178 – 179 (2016) Published by www.researchtrend.net Epilobium hirsutum L. (Onagraceae): A New Distributional Report for Northern Haryana, India Inam Mohammed & Amarjit Singh* Guru Nanak Khalsa College, Yamuna Nagar,Haryana,India. *Corresponding author: [email protected] | Received: 24 November2016 | Accepted: 26 December 2016 | ABSTRACT The paper presents a taxon namely Epilobium hirsutum L. a showy member of Onagraceae and a Eurasian species collected and identified for the first time from district Yamuna nagar, Nothern Haryana. Key Words: Epilobium, Eurasian, Northern Haryana. INTRODUCTION The genus Epilobium L. with more than 300 specimens from Meerut region near Ganga canal. species occurs in all continents relatively at high Malik et al (2014) collected and identified this altitudes. Clarke (1879) described 12 species under species from district Saharanpur of Uttar Pradesh. the genus Epilobium from East and North- East During the survey of district Yamuna Nagar of Himalaya. Raven (1962) recognized 37 species, Haryana, authors reported three sites of this which include 13 new taxa from the Himalayan species, covering an estimated 325 km square area. region and recorded 31 taxa from India. In the 20th Collected specimens were critically examined with century Peter H. Raven (1976) has researched relevant literature and identified with the help of phylogeny and systematics of willow herbs DD herbarium and BSD herbarium Dehradun. extensively. Giri and Banerjee (1984) wrote Identified specimens have been deposited in identification and distributional note on a few herbarium of Guru Nanak Khalsa College, Yamuna species of Epilobium. In Western Himalayas E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Site F043AY544ID
    Natural Resources Conservation Service Ecological site F043AY544ID Warm-Frigid, Xeric, Unglaciated, Loamy, Metasedimentary, Hills and Mountains, Mixed ash surface (Douglas-fir/dry shrub) Douglas fir / mallow ninebark - common snowberry Last updated: 10/14/2020 Accessed: 09/27/2021 General information Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site. MLRA notes Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 043A–Northern Rocky Mountains Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 043A–Northern Rocky Mountains Description of MLRAs can be found in: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. Available electronically at: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ref/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624#handbook LRU notes Most commonly found in LRU 43A09 (Western Bitterroot Foothills). Also found in adjacent areas of 43A11 (Bitterroot Metasedimentary Zone). Climate parameters were obtained from PRISM and other models for the area. Landscape descriptors are derived from USGS DEM products and their derivatives. Classification relationships Relationship to Other Established Classifications: United States National Vegetation Classification (2008) - A3392 Douglas fir- P. Pine / Shrub Understory Central Rocky Mt. Forest & Woodland Alliance Washington Natural Heritage Program. Ecosystems of Washington State, A Guide to Identification, Rocchio and Crawford, 2015 - Northern Rocky Mt. Dry-Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest (D. Fir – Pine) Description of Ecoregions of the United States, USFS PN # 1391, 1995 - M333 Northern Rocky Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Bull Run Creek and Bull Run RNA Was Not Thoroughly Collected, Described Or Studied at the Time This Species List Was First Developed
    Flora of the Bull Run Creek and Bull Run RNA was not thoroughly collected, described or studied at the time this species list was first developed. It is based on observations of Jan Bal of the University of Idaho and collections and observations of Charles Wellner. Mike Hays (at that time Palouse Ranger District Botanist) added those species marked with (h) 5/24/1995 and used it for an INPS White Pine chapter field trip. 6/4/1995; (c1) indicates plants collected and deposited in UI Herbarium by Wellner (and/or Bal). Trees Abies grandis Grand fir Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa pine Betula papyrifera Paper birch Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas-fir Larix occidentalis Western larch Taxus brevifolia (h) Pacific Yew Pinus monticola Western white pine Thuja plicata Western redcedar ********************************************* ********************************************* Shrubs and Subshrubs Acer glabrous Rocky Mountain maple Prunus virginiana (h) Common chokecherry Alnus incana Mountain alder Rhamnus purshiana (h) Cascara Alnus sinuate Sitka alder Ribes lacustre (h) Prickly current Amelanchier alnifolia Western Serviceberry Rosa sp Wild rose Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnickinnick/Bearberry Rosa gymnocarpa (h) Wild rose Berberis repens Creeping Oregongrape Rubus idaeus var. peramoenus Red raspberry Ceanothus sanguineus Redstem ceonathus Rubus leucodermis (h) Chrsothamnus nauseosus (c1) Common rabbit-brush Rubus nivalis (h) Snow bramble Cornus Canadensis Bunchberry Rubus parviflorus (c1) Thimbleberry Cornus stolonifera Red-osier dogwood Rubus ursinus
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Species to AVOID for Landscaping, Revegetation, and Restoration Colorado Native Plant Society Revised by the Horticulture and Restoration Committee, May, 2002
    Plant Species to AVOID for Landscaping, Revegetation, and Restoration Colorado Native Plant Society Revised by the Horticulture and Restoration Committee, May, 2002 The plants listed below are invasive exotic species which threaten or potentially threaten natural areas, agricultural lands, and gardens. This is a working list of species which have escaped from landscaping, reclamation projects, and agricultural activity. All problem plants may not be included; contact the Colorado Dept. of Agriculture for more information (see references below). Some drought resistent, well adapted exotic plants suggested for landscaping survive successfully outside cultivation. If you are unsure about introducing a new plant into your garden or reclamation/restoration plans, maintain a conservative approach. Try to research a new plant thoroughly before using it, or omit it from your plans. While there are thousands of introduced plants which pose no threats, there are some that become invasive, displacing and outcompeting native vegetation, and cost land managers time and money to deal with. If you introduce a plant and notice it becoming aggressive and invasive, remove it and report your experience to us, your county extension agent, and the grower. If you see a plant for sale that is listed on the Colorado Noxious Weed List, please report it to the CO Dept. of Ag. (Jerry Cochran, Nursery Specialist; 303.239.4153). This list will be updated periodically as new information is received. For more information, including a list of suggested native plants for horticultural use, and to contact us, please visit our website at www.conps.org. NOX NE & NRCS INV RMNP WISC CA CoNPS CD PCA UM COMMENTS COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME* (CO) GP INVASIVE EXOTIC FORBS – Often found in seed mixes or nurseries Baby's breath Gypsophila paniculata X X X X NATIVE ALTERNATIVES: Native penstemon Saponaria officinalis (Lychnis (Penstemon spp.); Rocky Mtn Beeplant (Cleome Bouncing bet, soapwort X X X X X saponaria) serrulata); Native white yarrow (Achillea lanulosa).
    [Show full text]
  • Payette National Forest
    Appendix 2 Proposed Forest Plan Amendments Sawtooth National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Chapter III Sawtooth WCS Appendix 2 Chapter III. Management Direction Table of Contents Management Direction......................................................................................................... III-1 Forest-Wide Management Direction ................................................................................ III-1 Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Candidate Species ....................................... III-1 Air Quality and Smoke Management .......................................................................... III-4 Wildlife Resources ....................................................................................................... III-5 Vegetation .................................................................................................................... III-9 Non-native Plants ....................................................................................................... III-13 Fire Management ....................................................................................................... III-14 Timberland Resources ............................................................................................... III-16 Rangeland Resources ................................................................................................. III-17 Minerals and Geology Resources .............................................................................. III-18 Lands and Special
    [Show full text]
  • Content of Lead and Cadmium in Aboveground Plant Organs of Grasses Growing on the Areas Adjacent to a Route of Big Traffic
    Environ Sci Pollut Res (2015) 22:978–987 DOI 10.1007/s11356-014-3634-9 REVIEW ARTICLE Content of lead and cadmium in aboveground plant organs of grasses growing on the areas adjacent to a route of big traffic K. Jankowski & A. G. Ciepiela & J. Jankowska & W. Szulc & R. Kolczarek & J. Sosnowski & B. Wiśniewska-Kadżajan & E. Malinowska & E. Radzka & W. Czeluściński & J. Deska Received: 4 September 2013 /Accepted: 19 September 2014 /Published online: 8 October 2014 # The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract The effect of traffic on the content of lead and selection of grassland sward in areas with a higher risk of cadmium in grass morphological parts—leaves, shoots, and heavy metals associated with dust sedimentation. inflorescences—was studied. The samples were taken on a part of the European route E30 (Siedlce by road). The follow- Keywords Heavy metals . Inflorescence . Distance from . ing plants were tested: Dactylis glomerata, Arrhenatherum Pollution source . Road . Deposition elatius,andAlopecurus pratensis. During the flowering of grasses, the plant material was collected at distances of 1, 5, 10, and 15 m from the edge of the road, on the strip of road Introduction with a length of 9 km. In the collected plant parts, the content of lead and cadmium using the atomic absorption spectrosco- Grasses are typical cover of soils adjacent to the roadway. py (AAS) method was determined. The effect of distance from They are subjected to continuous operation of stressful factors the road on the content of lead and cadmium was evaluated caused by the exploitation of the roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Poaceae: Pooideae) Based on Phylogenetic Evidence Pilar Catalán Universidad De Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 23 | Issue 1 Article 31 2007 A Systematic Approach to Subtribe Loliinae (Poaceae: Pooideae) Based on Phylogenetic Evidence Pilar Catalán Universidad de Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain Pedro Torrecilla Universidad Central de Venezuela, Maracay, Venezuela José A. López-Rodríguez Universidad de Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain Jochen Müller Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany Clive A. Stace University of Leicester, Leicester, UK Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Catalán, Pilar; Torrecilla, Pedro; López-Rodríguez, José A.; Müller, Jochen; and Stace, Clive A. (2007) "A Systematic Approach to Subtribe Loliinae (Poaceae: Pooideae) Based on Phylogenetic Evidence," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 23: Iss. 1, Article 31. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol23/iss1/31 Aliso 23, pp. 380–405 ᭧ 2007, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO SUBTRIBE LOLIINAE (POACEAE: POOIDEAE) BASED ON PHYLOGENETIC EVIDENCE PILAR CATALA´ N,1,6 PEDRO TORRECILLA,2 JOSE´ A. LO´ PEZ-RODR´ıGUEZ,1,3 JOCHEN MU¨ LLER,4 AND CLIVE A. STACE5 1Departamento de Agricultura, Universidad de Zaragoza, Escuela Polite´cnica Superior de Huesca, Ctra. Cuarte km 1, Huesca 22071, Spain; 2Ca´tedra de Bota´nica Sistema´tica, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Avenida El Limo´n s. n., Apartado Postal 4579, 456323 Maracay, Estado de Aragua,
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating Shrub and Snag Specific Lidar Data Into GAP Wildlife Models
    Notes Incorporating Shrub and Snag Specific LiDAR Data into GAP Wildlife Models Teresa J. Lorenz*, Kerri T. Vierling, Jody Vogeler, Jeffrey Lonneker, Jocelyn Aycrigg T.J. Lorenz, K.T. Vierling Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844 J. Vogeler Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844 Present address: Forest Ecosystems and Society, College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 J. Lonneker, J. Aycrigg Gap Analysis Program, Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83843 Abstract The U.S. Geological Survey’s Gap Analysis Program (hereafter, GAP) is a nationally based program that uses land cover, vertebrate distributions, and land ownership to identify locations where gaps in conservation coverage exist, and GAP products are commonly used by government agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and private citizens. The GAP land-cover designations are based on satellite-derived data, and although these data are widely available, these data do not capture the 3-dimensional vegetation architecture that may be important in describing vertebrate distributions. To date, no studies have examined how the inclusion of snag- or shrub-specific Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data might influence GAP model performance. The objectives of this paper were 1) to assess the performance of the National GAP models and Northwest GAP models with independently collected field data, and 2) to assess whether the inclusion of 3-dimensional vegetation data from LiDAR improved the performance of National GAP and Northwest GAP models. We included only two parameters from the LiDAR data: presence or absence of shrubs and presence or absence of snags $25 cm diameter at breast height.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollen Morphology of Poaceae (Poales) in the Azores, Portugal
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/283696832 Pollen morphology of Poaceae (Poales) in the Azores, Portugal ARTICLE in GRANA · OCTOBER 2015 Impact Factor: 1.06 · DOI: 10.1080/00173134.2015.1096301 READS 33 4 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Vania Gonçalves-Esteves Maria A. Ventura Federal University of Rio de Janeiro University of the Azores 86 PUBLICATIONS 141 CITATIONS 43 PUBLICATIONS 44 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Maria A. Ventura letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 10 December 2015 Grana ISSN: 0017-3134 (Print) 1651-2049 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/sgra20 Pollen morphology of Poaceae (Poales) in the Azores, Portugal Leila Nunes Morgado, Vania Gonçalves-Esteves, Roberto Resendes & Maria Anunciação Mateus Ventura To cite this article: Leila Nunes Morgado, Vania Gonçalves-Esteves, Roberto Resendes & Maria Anunciação Mateus Ventura (2015) Pollen morphology of Poaceae (Poales) in the Azores, Portugal, Grana, 54:4, 282-293, DOI: 10.1080/00173134.2015.1096301 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00173134.2015.1096301 Published online: 04 Nov 2015. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 13 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=sgra20 Download by: [b-on: Biblioteca do conhecimento
    [Show full text]
  • Symphoricarpos Albus (Common Snowberry)
    Symphoricarpos albus (common snowberry) http://depts.washington.edu/propplnt/Plants/Symphoricarpos_albus.htm Symphoricarpos albus (common snowberry) Image from: http://oregonstate.edu/dept/ldplants/syal6.htm Range Southern Alaska to California, and east to North Carolina. Climate, elevation Generally low to middle elevations in dry to moist woods and open areas. Will grow in partial shade, but prefers open areas. Local occurrence (where, how common) Thickets, open and/or rocky slopes, dense woods (forests), along roadsides, on sandy river banks, in deciduous uplands, and under Pacific madrones. Habitat preferences Full sun to partial shade. Warm, dry slopes and forests, or warm, moist slopes, or riparian benches and terraces. Plant strategy type/successional stage (stress-tolerator, competitor, weedy/colonizer, seral, late successional) Occurs as a climax species in early, mid, and late succession. Considered both climax and seral species. Associated species Holodiscus discolor, Physocarpus malvaceus, Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Festuca idahoensis, Pinus ponderosa, Pseudotsuga menziesii, Abies lasiocarpa, Crataegus douglasii, Rosa woodsii May be collected as: (seed, layered, divisions, etc.) Seeds, rhizomes Collection restrictions or guidelines Collect September-October through the winter. Seed germination (needs dormancy breaking?) Separate the seeds from the fleshy covering. Has a very tough, hard, and impermeable covering so the seeds 1 of 2 2/11/2021, 6:29 PM Symphoricarpos albus (common snowberry) http://depts.washington.edu/propplnt/Plants/Symphoricarpos_albus.htm are very hard to germinate. A 20 to 91 day warm stratification period followed by a cold stratification period of 60 to 300 days. Seed life (can be stored, short shelf-life, long shelf-life) 7-10 years under the right conditions.
    [Show full text]